DOCSLIB.ORG

Site-Specific Effects of Exotic Annual Grass Control Integrated with Revegetation L

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Site-Specific Effects of Exotic Annual Grass Control Integrated with Revegetation L RESEARCH ARTICLE Site-Specific Effects of Exotic Annual Grass Control Integrated with Revegetation L. Noelle Orloff, Jane M. Mangold and Fabian D. Menalled ABSTRACT Invasion by exotic annual grass species such as downy brome and Japanese brome has been implicated in ecosystem degradation in much of the western United States and strategies to restore lands dominated by these species are needed. We evaluated integration of herbicide and revegetation to restore old-field and rangeland sites dominated by annual brome species. In split-plot field studies, we compared three imazapic herbicide rates and eight seeding treatments at an old-field and a rangeland site. We evaluated brome, seeded species, and existing vegetation response to our treatments. Herbicide controlled annual brome at both sites, with > 95% decreases in brome biomass in plots treated with the high rate compared to non-sprayed controls. Control of annual brome persisted for two growing seasons at the old-field site and one season at the rangeland site. Annual brome abundance in non-treated control plots at both sites decreased by 80% between the first and second growing season. No seeded individuals established at the old-field site, but they persisted through two growing seasons at the rangeland site. Seeded species establishment at the rangeland site was impacted by both herbicide rate and seed mix, but no clear patterns emerged. Finally, while we controlled brome at both sites, existing desired vegetation increased only at the old-field site, where perennial grass biomass increased by about 30% in plots sprayed with both rates of herbicide. The differing responses of the existing and seeded plant communities across the two sites highlight the importance of integrating site-specific knowledge into restoration plans. Keywords: Bromus arvensis, Bromus tectorum, Conservation reserve program, downy brome, Japanese brome, land use history xotic annual grass invasion has been implicated in cases, long-term dominance by exotic annual grasses leads Eecological damage and change around the globe to the loss of desired perennial species from plant com- (D’Antonio and Vitousek 1992). In the western United munities through decreased recruitment and seed bank States, downy brome (Bromus tectorum) invasion in par- impoverishment, hindering the long-term success of con- ticular has been associated with decreased recruitment trol programs (Humphrey and Schupp 2001, 2004). These of desired species, altered fire regimes, and degradation differences in plant community responses to management of wildlife habitat (Mack 2011, Balch et al. 2013). This are driven by site-specific factors such as perennial plant species has also been identified as a barrier to restoration community composition, land use history, and abiotic char- efforts in degraded lands (Allen 1995, Di Tomaso 2000). acteristics such as episodic events of episodic precipitation Japanese brome (Bromus arvensis) is another exotic annual for a given year (Radosevich et al. 2007). grass closely related to downy brome (Baskin and Baskin In some cases, weed control and revegetation should 1981). Although Japanese brome does not have the invasive be integrated as a long-term strategy to suppress exotic potential of downy brome, these two species often grow annual grasses and provide habitat for livestock and wild- together in the western United States, particularly in the life (Elseroad and Rudd 2011, Hirsch-Shantz et al. 2014). Northern Great Plains, and are a concern in both cropland However, re-establishing desired species is often difficult on and rangeland settings (Ogle et al. 2003, Gasch et al. 2013). lands dominated by invasive annual grasses (Allen 1995, Di Simply controlling exotic annual grasses does not nec- Tomaso 2000). Though many factors can influence estab- essarily restore a desired perennial plant community on lishment of seeded perennial species, competition from a given site. In some cases, desired perennial vegetation exotic annual grasses in particular can decrease establish- increases in abundance following removal of annual grasses ment of perennial grasses and contribute to failure of seed- (Davies and Sheley 2011, Elseroad and Rudd 2011). In other ing efforts (Hull and Stewart 1948, Romo and Eddleman 1987, Davies et al. 2010, but see James and Svejcar 2010). Ecological Restoration Vol. 33, No. 2, 2015 Suppression of annual grasses may help perennial species ISSN 1522-4740 E-ISSN 1543-4079 to establish during revegetation (Morris et al 2009, Davies ©2015 by the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System. and Sheley 2011). June 2015 ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION 33:2 • 147 Figure 1. Annual and long term precipitation data for the closest weather station to each study site (Ft. Assiniboine, Montana, US for the old-field site [~30 km from site]; Malta 7 E, Montana, US for the rangeland site [~ 8 km from site]). All years in the period of record were used to calculate means (94 and 39 years for Ft. Assiniboine and Malta 7 E, respectively) (WRCC 2014). Imazapic is an herbicide that can be used to control Further, we tested the performance of three species in winter annual grasses in rangelands and old-field sites monoculture and mixes commonly used in revegetation (Morris et al. 2009, Mangold et al. 2013) and help revegeta- settings. We hypothesized that controlling annual brome tion efforts. Integrating imazapic with seeding can favor species would increase seeded species emergence and seeded species, but it could also result in non-target effects. establishment and increase existing perennial plant abun- For example, research suggests that high rates of ima- dance. Second, we hypothesized that the responses of zapic reduce seeded species establishment and damage brome and the existing perennial plant community to our beneficial plants, though these effects are species-specific treatments would be site-specific. and depend on timing of herbicide application relative to seeding (Shinn and Thill 2004, Sheley et al. 2007, Sbatella Methods et al. 2011). Thus, evaluation of perennial species that are competitive with annual grasses and tolerant of imazapic We conducted this study over three years (2009–2011) at rates recommended for annual grass control is needed an old-field and a rangeland site in north-central Mon- to improve revegetation practices. To achieve this goal, tana, U.S.A. Sites differed in land use history, existing we evaluated the integration of herbicide (imazapic) and plant community composition, and annual brome species seeding to restore sites in the Northern Great Plains that composition. During the course of this study, both sites are dominated by annual brome species. At two contrast- experienced normal to above average annual precipita- ing sites, we compared two herbicide application rates tion compared to historical means (old-field, 1917–2011; that would facilitate the emergence and survival of seeded rangeland, 1972–2011) (Western Regional Climate Center species by decreasing annual brome species abundance. 2014; Figure 1). 148 • June 2015 ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION 33:2 Old-field Study Site Seeding treatments were applied the spring following the The old-field site (48°26'55.40" N, 109°51'57.45" W) was herbicide application (April 19, 2010 at the rangeland site; located at an elevation of 800 m, with fine loam soils and April 20, 2010 at the old-field sites). We used a 120 cm wide mean annual precipitation of 307 mm (Soil Survey Staff hoe seeder to sow eight rows in each main plot at 30 cm 2013, Western Regional Climate Center 2014). The site was spacing and two cm depth. We chose three species for each located in a former agricultural field which was plowed and location based on site characteristics (e.g., precipitation and seeded to a perennial grass mix in 2003 as part of the Con- soil type), fall-applied imazapic tolerance according to the servation Reserve Program (CRP). We initiated our study product label, and observations of local plant communities in 2009 and by then a mix of downy brome and Japanese (Anonymous 2008, Sheley et al. 2008). Species consisted of brome, hereafter referred to as brome, dominated the site, two grasses and a forb at each site, and seeding rates for with an associated substantial litter layer. When we started single species plots followed Sheley et al. (2008). Seeded our study, the existing non-brome plant community was species and rates at the old-field site were thickspike wheat- comprised of remnant perennial grasses seeded by the pri- grass (Elymus lanceolatus ‘Bannock’) at 12 kg pure live seed vate landowner in 2003 (western wheatgrass [Pascopyrum (PLS)/ha, pubescent wheatgrass (Thinopyrum intermedium smithii], green needlegrass [Stipa viridula], and crested ‘Luna’) at 16 kg PLS/ha, and purple prairieclover (Dalea wheatgrass [Agropyron cristatum]) and weedy perennial purpurea ‘Bismark’) at 9 kg PLS/ha. At the rangeland site, and annual forbs (dandelion [Taraxacum officinale], field we sowed western wheatgrass (‘Rosana’) at 18 kg PLS/ha, bindweed [Calystegia hederacea], yellow sweetclover [Meli- and pubescent wheatgrass and purple prairieclover at the lotus officinalis], prickly lettuce [Lactuca serriola], and same rates as above. Each species was sown singly, and in kochia [Bassia scoparia]). all combinations of two and three species for a total of eight seeding treatments including a non-seeded control. Rangeland Study Site For mixtures, we adjusted seeding rates so the total number The rangeland site (48°08'23.59" N, 107°52'15.58" W) was of seeds/m2 remained constant and species were seeded in located at an elevation of 725 m, with clay loam soils and equal proportions. mean annual precipitation of 329 mm (Soil Survey Staff Sampling was conducted in 2010 and 2011 to quantify 2013, Western Regional Climate Center 2014). This site was brome and plant community response to herbicide treat- on private land used primarily for cattle production and ments, and seeded species emergence (2010) and establish- had no history of plowing or cultivation.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Long-Term Changes in Biological Soil Crust Cover and Composition Eva Dettweiler-Robinson1*, Jeanne M Ponzetti2 and Jonathan D Bakker3
    Dettweiler-Robinson et al. Ecological Processes 2013, 2:5 http://www.ecologicalprocesses.com/content/2/1/5 RESEARCH Open Access Long-term changes in biological soil crust cover and composition Eva Dettweiler-Robinson1*, Jeanne M Ponzetti2 and Jonathan D Bakker3 Abstract Introduction: Communities change over time due to disturbances, variations in climate, and species invasions. Biological soil crust communities are important because they contribute to erosion control and nutrient cycling. Crust types may respond differently to changes in environmental conditions: single-celled organisms and bryophytes quickly recover after a disturbance, while lichens are slow growing and dominate favorable sites. Community change in crusts has seldom been assessed using repeated measures. For this study, we hypothesized that changes in crust composition were related to disturbance, topographic position, and invasive vegetation. Methods: We monitored permanent plots in the Columbia Basin in 1999 and 2010 and compared changes in crust composition, cover, richness, and turnover with predictor variables of herbivore exclosure, elevation, heat load index, time since fire, presence of an invasive grass, and change in cover of the invasive grass. Results: Bryophytes were cosmopolitan with high cover. Dominant lichens did not change dramatically. Indicator taxa differed by monitoring year. Bryophyte and total crust cover declined, and there was lower turnover outside of herbivore exclosures. Lichen cover did not change significantly. Plots that burned recently had high turnover. Increase in taxon richness was correlated with presence of an invasive grass in 1999. Change in cover of the invasive grass was positively related to proportional loss and negatively related to gain. Conclusions: Composition and turnover metrics differed significantly over 11 years, though cover was more stable between years.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Plant Growth and Seedling Establishment in Soils Influenced by Bromus Tectorum Helen I
    Rangeland Ecol Manage 61:630–639 | November 2008 Native Plant Growth and Seedling Establishment in Soils Influenced by Bromus tectorum Helen I. Rowe1 and Cynthia S. Brown2 Authors are 1Research Professor, Forestry and Natural Resources Department, Purdue University, 195 Marsteller Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA; and 2Assistant Professor, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, 1177 Campus Delivery, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA. Abstract The invasion of 40 million hectares of the American West by cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum L.) has caused widespread modifications in the vegetation of semi-arid ecosystems and increased the frequency of fires. In addition to well-understood mechanisms by which cheatgrass gains competitive advantage, it has been implicated in reducing arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) abundance and taxa diversity. We evaluated this possibility at a high elevation site in a two-pronged approach. To test whether cheatgrass changed native AMF communities in ways that affected subsequent native plant growth, we grew cheatgrass and native plants in native soils and then planted native plants into these soils in a greenhouse experiment. We found that cheatgrass-influenced soils did not inhibit native plant growth or AMF sporulation or colonization. To test whether soils in cheatgrass-dominated areas inhibited establishment and growth of native plants, cheatgrass was removed and six seeding combinations were applied. We found that 14.02 6 1.7 seedlings ? m22 established and perennial native plant cover increased fourfold over the three years of this study. Glyphosate reduced cheatgrass cover to less than 5% in the year it was applied but did not facilitate native plant establishment or growth compared with no glyphosate.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Environmental and Socio-Economic Impacts of Selected Alien Grasses As a Basis for Ranking Threats to South Africa
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal NeoBiota 41: 19–65Global (2018) environmental and socio-economic impacts of selected alien grasses... 19 doi: 10.3897/neobiota.41.26599 RESEARCH ARTICLE NeoBiota http://neobiota.pensoft.net Advancing research on alien species and biological invasions Global environmental and socio-economic impacts of selected alien grasses as a basis for ranking threats to South Africa Khensani V. Nkuna1,2, Vernon Visser3,4, John R.U. Wilson1,2, Sabrina Kumschick1,2 1 South African National Biodiversity Institute, Kirstenbosch Research Centre, Cape Town, South Africa 2 Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Matieland, 7602, South Africa 3 SEEC – Statistics in Ecology, Environment and Conservation, Department of Statistical Scien- ces, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, 7701 South Africa 4 African Climate and Development Initiative, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, 7701, South Africa Corresponding author: Sabrina Kumschick ([email protected]) Academic editor: C. Daehler | Received 14 May 2018 | Accepted 14 November 2018 | Published 21 December 2018 Citation: Nkuna KV, Visser V, Wilson JRU, Kumschick S (2018) Global environmental and socio-economic impacts of selected alien grasses as a basis for ranking threats to South Africa. NeoBiota 41: 19–65. https://doi.org/10.3897/ neobiota.41.26599 Abstract Decisions to allocate management resources should be underpinned by estimates of the impacts of bio- logical invasions that are comparable across species and locations. For the same reason, it is important to assess what type of impacts are likely to occur where, and if such patterns can be generalised. In this paper, we aim to understand factors shaping patterns in the type and magnitude of impacts of a subset of alien grasses.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Supplementary Information for Invasive Grasses Increase
    Supplementary Information For Invasive grasses increase fire occurrence and frequency across U.S. ecoregions Emily J. Fusco1*, John T. Finn2, Jennifer K. Balch3,4, R. Chelsea Nagy3, Bethany A. Bradley1,2 Affiliations: 1 Graduate Program in Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, University of Massachusetts- Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, 01003, USA 2 Department of Environmental Conservation, University of Massachusetts- Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, 01003, USA 3 Earth Lab, University of Colorado- Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, 80309, USA 4 Department of Geography, University of Colorado-Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, 80309, USA Correspondence to: [email protected] This PDF file includes: Figure S1 Tables S1 to S4 SI References 1 www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1908253116 Supplemental Table S1: A list of 176 non-native invasive grass and other graminoid species as listed by the Invasive Plant Atlas of the United States (1). For each species, we conducted a Web of Science (WOS) search and recorded whether there was literature suggesting the species altered fire regimes (Yes/No). For each fire promoting species in WOS, we supplemented our determination of whether that species was a fire promoter using the Fire Effects Information System (FEIS; 2). For each species designated as a fire promoter, we searched for available spatial data, and kept only species that were both fire-promoting with spatial data for our analysis. Final species used are highlighted in yellow. WOS FEIS Fire Data Keep for Scientific Name Common Name(s) Search Database Promoter Available Analysis Achnatherum punagrass No - No - No brachychaetum Godr. Barkworth Aegilops cylindrica Host jointed goatgrass No - No - No Aegilops ovate goatgrass No - No - No geniculata Roth Aegilops triuncialis L.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoring Palouse and Canyon Grasslands: Putting Back the Missing Pieces
    TECHNICAL BULLETIN NO. 01-15 IDAHO BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT AUGUST 2001 RESTORING PALOUSE AND CANYON GRASSLANDS: PUTTING BACK THE MISSING PIECES Compiled and Edited by Bertie J. Weddell Restoring Palouse and Canyon Grasslands: Putting Back the Missing Pieces A. Restoration of Palouse and Canyon Grasslands: A Review. B.J. Weddell and J. Lichthardt B. Soil Biological fingerprints from Meadow Steppe and Steppe Communities with Native and Non-native Vegetation. B.J. Weddell, P. Frohne, and A.C. Kennedy C. Experimental Test of Microbial Biocontrol of Cheatgrass. B.J. Weddell, A. Kennedy, P. Frohne, and S. Higgins D. Experimental Test of the Effects of Erosion Control Blankets on the Survival of Bluebunch Wheatgrass Plugs. B.J. Weddell Complied and edited by Bertie J. Weddell dRaba Consulting 1415 NW State Street Pullman, WA 99163 March 2000 for the Bureau of Land Management Cottonwood Field Office Route 3, Box 181 Cottonwood, ID 83522 Table of Contents Contributors ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- iii Acknowledgments ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- iv Overview --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- v 1. Restoration of Palouse and Canyon Grasslands: A Review, B.J. Weddell and J. Lichthardt -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 1.1 Introduction ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Strong Genetic Differentiation in the Invasive Annual Grass Bromus Tectorum Across the Mojave–Great Basin Ecological Transition Zone
    Biol Invasions (2016) 18:1611–1628 DOI 10.1007/s10530-016-1105-6 ORIGINAL PAPER Strong genetic differentiation in the invasive annual grass Bromus tectorum across the Mojave–Great Basin ecological transition zone Susan E. Meyer . Elizabeth A. Leger . Desire´e R. Eldon . Craig E. Coleman Received: 22 April 2015 / Accepted: 1 March 2016 / Published online: 9 March 2016 Ó Springer International Publishing Switzerland (outside the USA) 2016 Abstract Bromus tectorum, an inbreeding annual from haplogroups common in Great Basin habitats. We grass, is a dominant invader in sagebrush steppe habitat conducted common garden studies comparing adap- in North America. It is also common in warm and salt tive traits and field performance among haplogroups deserts, displaying a larger environmental tolerance typically found in different habitats. In contrast to the than most native species. We tested the hypothesis that haplogroup abundant in sagebrush steppe, warm desert a suite of habitat-specific B. tectorum lineages haplogroups generally lacked a vernalization require- dominates warm desert habitats. We sampled 30 B. ment for flowering. The most widespread warm desert tectorum Mojave Desert and desert fringe populations haplogroup (Warm Desert 1) also had larger seeds and and genotyped 10–26 individuals per population using a higher root:shoot ratio than other haplogroups. In the 69 single nucleotide polymorphic (SNP) markers. We field, performance of warm desert haplogroups was compared these populations to 11 Great Basin steppe dramatically lower than the sagebrush steppe hap- and salt desert populations. Populations from warm logroup at one steppe site, but one warm desert desert habitats were dominated by members of two haplogroup performed as well as the steppe haplogroup haplogroups (87 % of individuals) that were distinct under drought conditions at the other site.
    [Show full text]
  • Unassisted Invasions: Understanding and Responding to Australia's High
    CSIRO PUBLISHING Australian Journal of Botany, 2017, 65, 678–690 Turner Review No. 21 https://doi.org/10.1071/BT17152 Unassisted invasions: understanding and responding to Australia’s high-impact environmental grass weeds Rieks D. van Klinken A,C and Margaret H. Friedel B ACSIRO, EcoSciences Precinct, PO Box 2583, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia. BCSIRO, PO Box 2114, Alice Springs, NT 0871, Australia. CCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract. Alien grass species have been intentionally introduced into Australia since European settlement over 200 years ago, with many subsequently becoming weeds of natural environments. We have identified the subset of these weeds that have invaded and become dominant in environmentally important areas in the absence of modern anthropogenic disturbance, calling them ‘high-impact species’. We also examined why these high-impact species were successful, and what that might mean for management. Seventeen high-impact species were identified through literature review and expert advice; all had arrived by 1945, and all except one were imported intentionally, 16 of the 17 were perennial and four of the 17 were aquatic. They had become dominant in diverse habitats and climates, although some environments still remain largely uninvaded despite apparently ample opportunities. Why these species succeeded remains largely untested, but evidence suggests a combination of ecological novelty (both intended at time of introduction and unanticipated), propagule pressure (through high reproductive rate and dominance in nearby anthropogenically-disturbed habitats) and an ability to respond to, and even alter, natural disturbance regimes (especially fire and inundation). Serious knowledge gaps remain for these species, but indications are that resources could be better focused on understanding and managing this limited group of high-impact species.
    [Show full text]
  • Bromus Tectorum Expansion and Biodiversity Loss on the Snake River Plain, Southern Idaho, USA
    VIth International Rangeland Congress Proceedings Vol. 2 dispersal highlights the importance of controlling seed sources along bore drains. High seed and seedling mortality after fire gives managers a cheap tool for controlling invasion of exten- sive downs landscapes, despite the fire resistance of mature trees (Pratt & Knight 1971). Although an integrated strategy based on ecological knowl- edge allows us to maximize our effect on Acacia nilotica populations while minimizing management efforts, we do not know whether such a strategy will reduce populations to be- Fig. 2. Survival of seeds and seedlings after fire. The treatments (left– right on x-axis) are (i) Control: background levels of seed low problem levels. Prickly acacia may produce enough seed germination and seedling survival adjusted to 100%; in wet years to perpetuate existing populations through a (ii) Dung: germination of seeds in dung after fire; number of succeeding years. Dung pat density (determined by (iii) Surface: germination of seeds on the soil surface after cattle numbers and movements) may determine eventual tree fire; (iv) 1cm: germination of seeds buried at 1 cm after fire; density, rather than seed numbers only (D. Kriticos et al. (v) Seedlings: survival of first-year seedlings after fire unpubl.). Also, fire may prove ineffective if applied to older Discussion juvenile plants, which may be fire resistant (Pratt & Knight Our results highlight three major weaknesses in the life 1971). Projection of the results of this study into the future history of Acacia nilotica that could be exploited by land man- using generic woody weed models and detailed ecological data, agers using low-cost practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Bromus Tectorum) with Sheep Grazing and Herbicide
    Article Integrated Management of Cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) with Sheep Grazing and Herbicide Erik A. Lehnhoff 1,*, Lisa J. Rew 2, Jane M. Mangold 2, Tim Seipel 2 and Devon Ragen 3 1 Department of Entomology, Plant Pathology and Weed Science, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA 2 Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA; [email protected] (L.J.R.); [email protected] (J.M.M.); [email protected] (T.S.) 3 Department of Animal and Range Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1 (575) 646-2328 Received: 22 May 2019; Accepted: 1 June 2019; Published: 14 June 2019 Abstract: Cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum L.) is one of the most problematic weeds in western United States rangelands and sagebrush steppe. It responds positively to different forms of disturbance, and its management has proven difficult. Herbicide or targeted grazing alone often fail to provide adequate long-term control. Integrating both may afford better control by providing multiple stressors to the weed. We assessed herbicide application, targeted sheep grazing and integrated herbicide and grazing on B. tectorum and the plant community in rangeland in southwestern Montana from 2015 until 2017. Herbicide treatments included spring-applied (May 2015 and 2016) glyphosate, fall-applied (October 2015) glyphosate, imazapic and rimsulfuron, and spring-applied glyphosate plus fall-applied imazapic. Targeted grazing, consisting of four sheep/0.01 ha for a day in 5 m × 20 m plots (all vegetation removed to the ground surface), occurred twice (May 2015 and 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • Downy Brome: Bromus Tectorum L
    PNW 474 • October 1994 Downy Brome Bromus tectorum L. P.E. Nesse and D.A. Ball owny brome (Bromus tectorum L.), also known Das cheatgrass, was intro- duced into the North American continent from the Mediterra- nean area of Europe. It was identified in the eastern United States in 1861, and by 1914 this aggressive weed had spread throughout the continent. Downy Brome is of particular importance in the northern Great Plains, intermountain west, and the inland Pacific Northwest. It is present to a lesser extent in most of the con- tinental United States except for the extreme southeastern tier of states. In much of the Pacific North- west and intermountain west, Figure 1.—Downy brome in the vegetative growth stage. downy brome provides an im- portant source of spring forage on arid grazing lands. How- Downy brome is a major ever, the forage quality of weed problem in winter wheat, downy brome decreases as perennial grass seed, and alfalfa plants mature. Protein content in much of the Pacific North- drops to about 3 percent as west and Great Plains. Downy plants mature, and long slender brome infestations of 10 and 50 awns on the seed head can limit plants per square foot can re- feed intake by irritating and duce winter wheat yields by 40 puncturing the soft tissues in- and 92 percent, respectively. side the mouth of grazing ani- Downy brome is especially mals. troublesome in drier production areas where crop rotations are mostly limited to winter wheat followed by a year of summer fallow (winter wheat-summer Philip E.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology and Management of Brome Grass ( Bromus Rigidus Roth and Bromus Diandrus Roth) in Cropping Sustems of Southern Australia
    Ecology and Management of Brome Grass (Bromus rigidus Roth and Bromus diandrus Roth) in Cropping Systems of Southern Australia SAMUEL GEORGE LLOYD KLEEMANN Bachelor of Agricultural Science (General) A thesis by prior publications submitted to The University of Adelaide, South Australia In the fulfilment of the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Agriculture, Food and Wine Faculty of Sciences I TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................. IV DECLARATION ..................................................................................................................... VI PUBLICATIONS ARISING FROM THIS THESIS ............................................................ VIII ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ....................................................................................................... IX ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................ X CHAPTER 1 REVIEW OF LITERATURE .................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1 2. Taxonomy ............................................................................................................................. 3 3. Ecology and Biology............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Antoninka Plant and Soil 2017.Pdf
    Plant Soil DOI 10.1007/s11104-017-3300-3 REGULAR ARTICLE Maximizing establishment and survivorship of field-collected and greenhouse-cultivated biocrusts in a semi-cold desert Anita Antoninka & Matthew A. Bowker & Peter Chuckran & Nichole N. Barger & Sasha Reed & Jayne Belnap Received: 31 March 2017 /Accepted: 25 May 2017 # Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017 Abstract methods to reestablish biocrusts in damaged drylands Aims Biological soil crusts (biocrusts) are soil-surface are needed. Here we test the reintroduction of field- communities in drylands, dominated by cyanobacteria, collected vs. greenhouse-cultured biocrusts for mosses, and lichens. They provide key ecosystem func- rehabilitation. tions by increasing soil stability and influencing soil Methods We collected biocrusts for 1) direct reapplica- hydrologic, nutrient, and carbon cycles. Because of this, tion, and 2) artificial cultivation under varying hydration regimes. We added field-collected and cultivated biocrusts (with and without hardening treatments) to Responsible Editor: Jayne Belnap. bare field plots and monitored establishment. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this Results Both field-collected and cultivated article (doi:10.1007/s11104-017-3300-3) contains supplementary cyanobacteria increased cover dramatically during the material, which is available to authorized users. experimental period. Cultivated biocrusts established more rapidly than field-collected biocrusts, attaining A. Antoninka (*) : M. A. Bowker : P. Chuckran School of Forestry, Northern Arizona University, 200 E. Pine ~82% cover in only one year, but addition of field- Knoll Dr., P.O. Box 15018, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA collected biocrusts led to higher species richness, bio- e-mail: [email protected] mass (as assessed by chlorophyll a) and level of devel- opment.
    [Show full text]