The Shipps Odyssey in Retrospect
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Review of Books on the Book of Mormon 1989–2011 Volume 7 Number 2 Article 10 1995 The Shipps Odyssey in Retrospect Louis Midgley Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/msr BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Midgley, Louis (1995) "The Shipps Odyssey in Retrospect," Review of Books on the Book of Mormon 1989–2011: Vol. 7 : No. 2 , Article 10. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/msr/vol7/iss2/10 This Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Review of Books on the Book of Mormon 1989–2011 by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Title The Shipps Odyssey in Retrospect Author(s) Louis Midgley Reference Review of Books on the Book of Mormon 7/2 (1995): 219–52. ISSN 1050-7930 (print), 2168-3719 (online) Abstract Review of Mormonism: The Story of a New Religious Tradition (1985), by Jan Shipps. Jan Shipps. Mormonism: The Story of a New Relig ious Tradition. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1985. 211 pp., with index. $11.95, paperback. Reviewed by Louis Midgley The Shipps Odyssey in Retrospect Where, then , do we draw the line between explain ing and "explaining away"? . It is either a fact, or legend , or lie. You must take it or leave it. C. S. Lewis, .. 'Horrid Red Things' "1 Some, impressed by the sheer mass and charge o f the Book of Monnon, are now asking why it can ' t be seriously and respectfully treated as a myth . Lois of myths are today coming in for the most reverential treatment. But the hook disdains such subterfuge. and never tires of reminding us that it is not myth but hi s tory and mu st stand or fall as such ... To call th is rec ord a myth is to condemn it as effectively as by calling it a fraud. Hugh Nibley2 By happenstance, lan Shipps's Mormonism: Th e Story of a Ne w ReligiOlu Tradition was published a few years before the Review of Books on the Book of Mormon was begun. The assess me nt of the Book of Mormon contained in this book. if it were published now, wo uld warrant comment. The celebratory treal- c. S. Lewis. God ill lire Dock: Esm}'s un Theulugy (U/d Elhies. ed. Walter l'looper (Grand Rapids. MI: Eerdmans. 1970).71. 2 Hugh Nibley. Since C!lmorah. 2nd cd. (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book and FARMS. 19811). :\:iv- :\:v, 220 REV IEW or BOOKS ON THE BOOK OF MORMON 712 (1995) men! this book has already recei ved,3 and the loft y reputation of its author- the premier non-Mormon ex pert on Mormon th ings justifies retrospective anemian 10 Jan Shipps's book. It Iherefore seems appropriate, at the tent h anni versary of the publication of Mormonism, to examine its author's voyage of discovery as she has stri ven to fashion a sat isfactory explanation of the Book of Mormon and its place in the history. as we ll as Ihe fai th and mem ory of Latter-day Saints.4 I will not examine her crowning achievement-the notion that the Church is not a cult, at least as Ihat term is now used by Evan gelical Protestant critics. nor a sect nor a denomination, and that it is nei ther Catholic nor Protestant, but "a new religious tradi li o n."5 This is an adaptation of the opini on first broached in 1945 by Fawn M, Brodie, who claimed that Mormonism "was a 3 I have located twenty ,three reviews (or re vi ew essays) ~ea l in g with Shi pps's Mormo nism- mostly affirmati ve: there are, however, probably other reviews th at I have not located. Kla u ~ J. Hanse n, in a pre publication review entitled "Jan Ship ps and the Mormon Tradition," Journal of Mormon His /ory I I (1984): 135-45, describes Mormonism ""as one of the mos t significant and sti mulati ng wo rks in the history of Mormo n sc holarship, as well as a major contribut ion to th e li terature of religious studi es:' Ibid., 136. But he also faults Shipps for not addressing the h<lrd qucstions of whether th e Book of Mormon is what it clai ms 10 be and hcnce wheth er Joseph Smith tol d the trut h. Thomas G. Alexander, in a tendentious re view en titled "Substa ntial , Importam, Brill iant." Dia/ogue 1814 (Winter 1985): 185-87. lio nizes Shipps. and lashes out at Ha nsen "on the leCt'· and those critics he imagines ""o n the right:' Sterli ng M. MeMurrin has praised Shipps in the Journal of American Ethnic History 8 (Fall 1988): 129- 30: and al so in Essays (uui MO/wgm plu in C% ratlo History 4 (1986): 101- 5. Some th oughtful commems on Mormoni.rm have occasionally been packaged as pa rlor review essays. Some of the mOS I pe rceptive (3 11 in lo this class and inc lude especiall y Davi s Bi tton, 'The Mormon Pas t: The Search for Understanding," Religious Swdies R('view 1112 (Ap ri l 1985): 11 4-20: and Mart in Ri dge. "Joseph Smith, Brigham Young, and a Religious Tradition:' Reviews ill Americun History 14 (March 1986): 25-33. Othet reviews also raise subt le questio ns about the method and arguments employed by Shipps. See e.\pcciall y M. Gerald Bradford, JourllLllfor the ScientifiC Study of Religion 26/1 (March 1987): 11 7-18: also in IJ YU SlUdies 2812 (Spring 198~): 113-15. 4 Shipps recognizes that explanations of Joseph Smith and the Book of Mormon cannot be made independent of each other. 5 Shipps's speculation docs nOI apply to the RLDS, who have had con- siderable Proteslant leanings from thei r begin ni ng in 1860 and who are now moving toward Protestant liberalism . SHIPPS, MORMONISM (MIDGLEY) 221 real religious creati on, one intended to be to Christianity as Chris tianity was to Judaism: that is, a reform and a consummation," though Shipps insists that "her sustained argument does not fol low the lines of Fawn M. Brodie's work."6 Introducing Shipps Shipps has been an influential figure among Mormon histori ans since 1973. She describes herself as an "inside-outsider" to the Latter-day Saint communit y.7 She is perhaps the only non Mormon scholar who has fashioned an entire career out of Mormon studies. In addition, she was both the first woman and the first non-Morman- with the exception of RLDS luminary Paul M. Edwards-to serve as presidenl of the Mormon History Asso ciation.S The first contact Shipps had with Latter-day Saints and the Mormon past came in 1960 when her husband- a librarian- look a position at Utah State University. Earlier she had studied music at two small Southern women's colleges. In Logan she switched from music to hi story, while working on a teaching certificate. At that time, according to Shipps. hi story at Utah State was Mormon and Utah hi story. Within a year she had her degree and moved with her husband to Colorado. With her interest in Mormon thin gs aroused, at age 36 she earned a doctoral degree in history at the University of Colorado. The novel explanation of Joseph Smith and the Book of Mormon contained in the initial chapter of her dissertalion,9 later modified and refined, got the attention of RLDS and Latter-day Saint hi storians. IO She eventually parlayed 6 Fawn M. Brod ie, No Man Knows My Hislory: The Life of Joseph Smilh, lire Mormon Prophet, 2nd. rev. cd. (New York: Knopr. 197 1). viii (q uoted by Shipps at p. 169 n. 2). 7 For a play on thi s formula, see Shipps's personill essay entitled "A n ' Inside-Outsider' in Zion," Dialoglle 151 1 (Spring 1982): 139-61. 8 She served in that role in 1979-80. 9 Jan Shipps, "The Mormons in Politics: The First Hu ndred Years" (Universi ty of Colorado. Ph.D. dissertation, 1965: Ann Arbor: University Mi(.;rofillns, 1974). J 0 See J;11l Shipps. 'The Prophet Puzzle: Suggestions Leading toward a More Comprehensive Interpretation of Joseph Smith:' JUI/mal of MOrmotl lIis lOry I ( 1974): 3-20: reprinted in The New MUrllwn HiSlOr)': Rel'isionisl Essuys 222 REVIEW OF BOOKS ON lliE BOOK OF MORMON 712 (1995) her degree into a pos ition teaching religious studies and hi story at Indiana Uni versity-Purdue Uni versity at Indianapolis. She is CUf remiy the key gentile "expert" on Mormon issues fo r the media. Recognizing the Crucial Truth Claims Shipps stresses the crucial role of the Book of Mormon in constituting the fai th of the fl edgling Church of Christ. The publi cation of the Book of Mormon set in place "Mormoni sm's fo un dational claims" (p. xii), which are linked to "the claims made in the book" (p. xiii; cf. p. 174 n. 5). Joseph Smith claimed " that the plates were actuall y a book whose text contained the Fulness of the gospel th at would lead to salvati on" (p. 13), Thus, " oo n Mormons become Mormons when they respond to Mormonism's fundamental truth claims by taki ng the Book of Mormon at face value,"ll But these truth claims are also potentiall y divisive, and "the tru th claims at the very heart of the Book of Mormon guar ameed," according to Shipps, that this potenti al would be realized as soon as this "very strange book," as Parley P.