Download September 2020 Issue Of
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
216 Part 218—Railroad Operating Practices
Pt. 217, App. A 49 CFR Ch. II (10–1–12 Edition) APPENDIX A TO PART 217—SCHEDULE OF CIVIL PENALTIES 1 Willful viola- Section Violation tion 217.7 Operating rules: (a) ............................................................................................................................................ $2,500 $5,000 (b) ............................................................................................................................................ $2,000 $5,000 (c) ............................................................................................................................................ $2,500 $5,000 217.9 Operational tests and inspections: (a) Failure to implement a program ........................................................................................ $9,500– $13,000– 12,500 16,000 (b) Railroad and railroad testing officer responsibilities:. (1) Failure to provide instruction, examination, or field training, or failure to con- duct tests in accordance with program ................................................................. 9,500 13,000 (2) Records ............................................................................................................... 7,500 11,000 (c) Record of program; program incomplete .......................................................................... 7,500– 11,000– 12,500 16,000 (d) Records of individual tests and inspections ...................................................................... 7,500 (e) Failure to retain copy of or conduct:. (1)(i) Quarterly -
Operation of Points
9100-000-007 Safeworking Rules and Procedures PUBLIC TRANSPORT AUTHORITY SAFEWORKING RULES AND PROCEDURES 9012 OPERATION OF POINTS 9012 Operation of Points Rev1.00 Date: 01 November 15 Page 1 of 18 9100-000-007 Safeworking Rules and Procedures CONTENTS 1. Purpose ................................................................................................................. 3 2. General .................................................................................................................. 3 3. Setting Points ........................................................................................................ 4 3.1. Indications of Points Setting ......................................................................... 4 3.2. Restoration of Points .................................................................................... 4 4. Movement over Points ........................................................................................... 5 4.1. Rail Traffic .................................................................................................... 5 4.2. Competent Workers ..................................................................................... 5 4.3. Trailing Points .............................................................................................. 5 5. Damaged Points .................................................................................................... 6 6. Failed Electrically Operated Points ....................................................................... 6 -
Llywodraeth Cymru / Welsh Government A487 New Dyfi Bridge Environmental Statement – Volume 1: Chapter 7 Cultural Heritage
Llywodraeth Cymru / Welsh Government A487 New Dyfi Bridge Environmental Statement – Volume 1 : Chapter 7 Cultural Heritage 900237-ARP-ZZ-ZZ-RP-YE-00020 Final issue | September 2017 This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of our client. It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by any third party and no responsibility is undertaken to any third party. Job number 244562 Ove Arup & Partners Ltd The Arup Campus Blythe Gate Blythe Valley Park Solihull B90 8AE United Kingdom www.arup.com Llywodraeth Cymru / Welsh Government A487 New Dyfi Bridge Environmental Statement – Volume 1: Chapter 7 Cultural Heritage Contents Page 7 Cultural Heritage 1 7.1 Introduction 1 7.2 Legislation, Policy Context and Guidance 1 7.3 Study Area 6 7.4 Methodology 6 7.5 Baseline Environment 12 7.6 Potential Construction Effects - Before Mitigation 34 7.7 Potential Operational Effects - Before Mitigation 36 7.8 Mitigation and Monitoring 37 7.9 Construction Effects - With Mitigation 38 7.10 Operational Effects - With Mitigation 38 7.11 Assessment of Cumulative Effects 38 7.12 Inter-relationships 38 7.13 Summary 38 900237-ARP-ZZ-ZZ-RP-YE-00020 | Final issue | September 2017 Llywodraeth Cymru / Welsh Government A487 New Dyfi Bridge Environmental Statement – Volume 1: Chapter 7 Cultural Heritage 7 Cultural Heritage 7.1 Introduction 7.1.1 This chapter provides an assessment of the Scheme in relation to archaeology and cultural heritage. It encompasses standing monuments, historic structures, buried archaeology and areas of heritage value such as historic landscapes, parks and gardens and Conservation Areas. -
Derailment and Collision Between Coal Trains Ravenan (25Km from Muswellbrook), New South Wales, on 26 September 2018
Derailment and collision between coal trains Ravenan (25km from Muswellbrook), New South Wales, on 26 September 2018 ATSB Transport Safety Report Rail Occurrence Investigation (Defined) RO-2018-017 Final – 18 December 2020 Cover photo: Source ARTC This investigation was conducted under the Transport Safety Investigation Act 2003 (Commonwealth) by the Office of Transport Safety Investigations (NSW) on behalf of the Australian Transport Safety Bureau in accordance with the Collaboration Agreement Released in accordance with section 26 of the Transport Safety Investigation Act 2003 Publishing information Published by: Australian Transport Safety Bureau Postal address: PO Box 967, Civic Square ACT 2608 Office: 62 Northbourne Avenue Canberra, ACT 2601 Telephone: 1800 020 616, from overseas +61 2 6257 2463 Accident and incident notification: 1800 011 034 (24 hours) Email: [email protected] Website: www.atsb.gov.au © Commonwealth of Australia 2020 Ownership of intellectual property rights in this publication Unless otherwise noted, copyright (and any other intellectual property rights, if any) in this publication is owned by the Commonwealth of Australia. Creative Commons licence With the exception of the Coat of Arms, ATSB logo, and photos and graphics in which a third party holds copyright, this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence is a standard form licence agreement that allows you to copy, distribute, transmit and adapt this publication provided that you attribute the work. The ATSB’s preference is that you attribute this publication (and any material sourced from it) using the following wording: Source: Australian Transport Safety Bureau Copyright in material obtained from other agencies, private individuals or organisations, belongs to those agencies, individuals or organisations. -
Muswellbrook to Ulan Balloon Loop
Division / Business Unit: Enterprise Services Function: Operations Interface Document Type: Route Access Standard Route Access Standard HHN Section Pages H4 - Muswellbrook to Ulan Balloon Loop Applicability ARTC Network Wide SMS Publication Requirement External Only Primary Source Document Status Version # Date Reviewed Prepared by Reviewed by Endorsed Approved 1.7 Nov 2017 Manager Stakeholders Manager GM Technical Standards Procedures Standards Development Amendment Record Amendments to the RAS are published at the following link https://www.artc.com.au/uploads/RAS_Amendments_Register.xlsx © Australian Rail Track Corporation Limited (ARTC) Disclaimer This document has been prepared by ARTC for internal use and may not be relied on by any other party without ARTC’s prior written consent. Use of this document shall be subject to the terms of the relevant contract with ARTC. ARTC and its employees shall have no liability to unauthorised users of the information for any loss, damage, cost or expense incurred or arising by reason of an unauthorised user using or relying upon the information in this document, whether caused by error, negligence, omission or misrepresentation in this document. This document is uncontrolled when printed. Authorised users of this document should visit ARTC’s intranet or extranet (www.artc.com.au) to access the latest version of this document. CONFIDENTIAL Page 1 of 10 Route Access Standard HHN Section Pages H4 - Muswellbrook to Ulan Balloon Loop Muswellbrook to Ulan Balloon Loop 1 Muswellbrook to Ulan Balloon Loop NB: These line maps are indicative only and should be reviewed in conjunction with the legend on page 3. For more detailed map information refer to the ARTC website. -
the Swindon and Cricklade Railway
The Swindon and Cricklade Railway Construction of the Permanent Way Document No: S&CR S PW001 Issue 2 Format: Microsoft Office 2010 August 2016 SCR S PW001 Issue 2 Copy 001 Page 1 of 33 Registered charity No: 1067447 Registered in England: Company No. 3479479 Registered office: Blunsdon Station Registered Office: 29, Bath Road, Swindon SN1 4AS 1 Document Status Record Status Date Issue Prepared by Reviewed by Document owner Issue 17 June 2010 1 D.J.Randall D.Herbert Joint PW Manager Issue 01 Aug 2016 2 D.J.Randall D.Herbert / D Grigsby / S Hudson PW Manager 2 Document Distribution List Position Organisation Copy Issued To: Copy No. (yes/no) P-Way Manager S&CR Yes 1 Deputy PW Manager S&CR Yes 2 Chairman S&CR (Trust) Yes 3 H&S Manager S&CR Yes 4 Office Files S&CR Yes 5 3 Change History Version Change Details 1 to 2 Updates throughout since last release SCR S PW001 Issue 2 Copy 001 Page 2 of 33 Registered charity No: 1067447 Registered in England: Company No. 3479479 Registered office: Blunsdon Station Registered Office: 29, Bath Road, Swindon SN1 4AS Table of Contents 1 Document Status Record ....................................................................................................................................... 2 2 Document Distribution List ................................................................................................................................... 2 3 Change History ..................................................................................................................................................... -
Rails by the Sea.Pdf
1 RAILS BY THE SEA 2 RAILS BY THE SEA In what ways was the development of the seaside miniature railway influenced by the seaside spectacle and individual endeavour from 1900 until the present day? Dr. Marcus George Rooks, BDS (U. Wales). Primary FDSRCS(Eng) MA By Research and Independent Study. University of York Department of History September 2012 3 Abstract Little academic research has been undertaken concerning Seaside Miniature Railways as they fall outside more traditional subjects such as standard gauge and narrow gauge railway history and development. This dissertation is the first academic study on the subject and draws together aspects of miniature railways, fairground and leisure culture. It examines their history from their inception within the newly developing fairground culture of the United States towards the end of the 19th. century and their subsequent establishment and development within the UK. The development of the seaside and fairground spectacular were the catalysts for the establishment of the SMR in the UK. Their development was largely due to two individuals, W. Bassett-Lowke and Henry Greenly who realized their potential and the need to ally them with a suitable site such as the seaside resort. Without their input there is no doubt that SMRs would not have developed as they did. When they withdrew from the culture subsequent development was firmly in the hands of a number of individual entrepreneurs. Although embedded in the fairground culture they were not totally reliant on it which allowed them to flourish within the seaside resort even though the traditional fairground was in decline. -
WALES of IRELAND St John's Wales Wales and Prettytenby
Lerwick Kirkwall Dunnet Head Cape Wrath Duncansby Head Strathy Whiten Scrabster John O'Groats Rudha Rhobhanais Head Point (Butt of Lewis) Thurso Durness Melvich Castletown Port Nis (Port of Ness) Bettyhill Cellar Head Tongue Noss Head Wick Gallan Head Steornabhagh (Stornoway) Altnaharra Latheron Unapool Kinbrace Lochinver Helmsdale Hushinish Point Lairg Tairbeart Greenstone (Tarbert) Point Ullapool Rudha Reidh Bonar Bridge Tarbat Dornoch Ness Tain Gairloch Loch nam Madadh Lossiemouth (Lochmaddy) Alness Invergordon Cullen Fraserburgh Uig Cromarty Macduff Elgin Buckie Dingwall Banff Kinlochewe Garve Forres Nairn Achnasheen Torridon Keith Turriff Dunvegan Peterhead Portree Inverness Aberlour Huntly Lochcarron Dufftown Rudha Hallagro Stromeferry Ellon Cannich Grantown- Kyle of Lochalsh Drumnadrochit on-Spey Oldmeldrum Dornie Rhynie Kyleakin Loch Baghasdail Inverurie (Lochboisdale) Invermoriston Shiel Bridge Alford Aviemore Aberdeen Ardvasar Kingussie Invergarry Bagh a Chaisteil Newtonmore (Castlebay) Mallaig Laggan Ballater Banchory Braemar Spean Dalwhinnie Stonehaven Bridge Fort William Pitlochry Brechin Glencoe Montrose Tobermory Ballachulish Kirriemuir Forfar Aberfeldy Lochaline Portnacroish Blairgowrie Arbroath Craignure Dunkeld Coupar Angus Carnoustie Connel Killin Dundee Monifieth Oban Tayport Lochearnhead Newport Perth -on-Tay Fionnphort Crianlarich Crieff Bridge of Earn St Andrews SCOTLAND Auchterarder Auchtermuchty Cupar Inveraray Ladybank Fife Ness Callander Falkland Strachur Tarbet Dunblane Kinross Bridge Elie of Allan Glenrothes -
Visitor Attraction Trends England 2003 Presents the Findings of the Survey of Visits to Visitor Attractions Undertaken in England by Visitbritain
Visitor Attraction Trends England 2003 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS VisitBritain would like to thank all representatives and operators in the attraction sector who provided information for the national survey on which this report is based. No part of this publication may be reproduced for commercial purp oses without previous written consent of VisitBritain. Extracts may be quoted if the source is acknowledged. Statistics in this report are given in good faith on the basis of information provided by proprietors of attractions. VisitBritain regrets it can not guarantee the accuracy of the information contained in this report nor accept responsibility for error or misrepresentation. Published by VisitBritain (incorporated under the 1969 Development of Tourism Act as the British Tourist Authority) © 2004 Bri tish Tourist Authority (trading as VisitBritain) Cover images © www.britainonview.com From left to right: Alnwick Castle, Legoland Windsor, Kent and East Sussex Railway, Royal Academy of Arts, Penshurst Place VisitBritain is grateful to English Heritage and the MLA for their financial support for the 2003 survey. ISBN 0 7095 8022 3 September 2004 VISITOR ATTR ACTION TRENDS ENGLAND 2003 2 CONTENTS CONTENTS A KEY FINDINGS 4 1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 12 1.1 Research objectives 12 1.2 Survey method 13 1.3 Population, sample and response rate 13 1.4 Guide to the tables 15 2 ENGLAND VISIT TRENDS 2002 -2003 17 2.1 England visit trends 2002 -2003 by attraction category 17 2.2 England visit trends 2002 -2003 by admission type 18 2.3 England visit trends -
Rail Accident Report
Rail Accident Report Derailment of a passenger train near Cummersdale, Cumbria 1 June 2009 Report 06/2010 March 2010 This investigation was carried out in accordance with: l the Railway Safety Directive 2004/49/EC; l the Railways and Transport Safety Act 2003; and l the Railways (Accident Investigation and Reporting) Regulations 2005. © Crown copyright 2010 You may re-use this document/publication (not including departmental or agency logos) free of charge in any format or medium. You must re-use it accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and you must give the title of the source publication. Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This document/publication is also available at www.raib.gov.uk. Any enquiries about this publication should be sent to: RAIB Email: [email protected] The Wharf Telephone: 01332 253300 Stores Road Fax: 01332 253301 Derby UK Website: www.raib.gov.uk DE21 4BA This report is published by the Rail Accident Investigation Branch, Department for Transport. * Cover photo courtesy of Network Rail Derailment of a passenger train near Cummersdale, Cumbria, 1 June 2009 Contents Preface 5 Key Definitions 5 The Accident 6 Summary of the accident 6 The parties involved 7 Location 8 External circumstances 8 The trains involved 10 Events preceding the accident 10 Events during the accident 10 Consequences of the accident 11 Events following the accident 11 The Investigation -
1 a New Age of Steam?
A new age of steam? The Tua Valley Line, Portugal - Experience and Examples from the Technological Heritage Operations and Preserved Railways of Britain. Dr Dominic Fontana Department of Geography, University of Portsmouth, United Kingdom [email protected] The railways of Portugal are well known to a global community of steam enthusiasts, many of whom used to visit the country specifically to experience and photograph the last days of steam traction until as late as the 1980s. The narrow gauge lines north of the Douro River, and the Tua Valley line in particular, were considered as very special railways. Their outstanding combination of narrow gauge steam traction, relatively long runs of track and extraordinarily beautiful landscapes, made for a magical railway experience. In the 1980s steam was replaced with diesel traction and although there are now regular but infrequent steam hauled tourist trains on the Douro Valley line, there are currently very limited opportunities for people to recapture this experience. Portugal has several railway museums including the excellent National Railway Museum in Entroncamento, but these present static displays rather than “live” steam and many railway enthusiasts consider this to be a poor substitute for the “real” thing where steam locomotives are operating in steam, within a fully-fledged railway environment. 0189 2-8-4T Henschel 1925 Mallet locomotive at Regua. 1 Portugal possesses over 100 redundant steam locomotives (Bailey, 2013) dispersed in yards around its national railway network, some of them remain potentially usable and many are certainly restorable to full operating condition. Portugal also possesses track and routes, which have been recently closed to passenger and freight traffic. -
Ngn 89 June 1974
Hon. Editor IVAN STEPHENSON 27 HILLHEAD DRIVE BIRSTALL • BATLEY YORKS. WFH OPA ~: Copyright THE NARROW GAUGE RAILWAY SOCIETY NUMBER 89 JUNE - JULY 1974 fROM YOUR EDITOR I seem to do not.ni.rg else lately but a,.i1,ologise for lateness, unfortunately this issue too is going to arrive with you Vf!ry late indeed, not only for the reasons explained in the last issue, but Rich Leithead, our NGN printer on top of moving house al so has to go into hospital - both of these in the 111iddle of the production schedul e for this i ssue of NGN. Punctuality however·would be very much iuproved if mat.erial arrived en the correct date and not anything up to 16 days late as has happened recently. !N FUTURE ANY DATA WHICH ARRIVES AFTER PRESS DATE WILL BE HEJ,D OVER,. NO MATTER HOW IMPORTANT IT IS DEEMEDro BE. PLEASE NOTE 3= PRESS DATE r'OR NOe 90 IS JULY 1sto SPECIAL NOTE TO ALL MDIBEP.S .... Your Meinbe:::-ship Sec,:rei:ar-y is getting all steamed up over outstanding subscriptions for this year ( L2o00 ) IF you have not already paid please send off your remittance at once s otherwise regrettably this must be the~ publication we send out to you. Address for sub1 renewals&= Ralph Martin 9 Hon Memb.erships~cretaryt 27 OakenbankCrescent~ Hudde~sfield9 Yorks~ HD5 81Do 1tHttt1ttannttttn1nttt,:1Hitttttnttt•ttt:tntHJHt,ntn,1,tt1lltn,n1ntt1tt1ntnnrtt1nnnt1t?lnnn11,u,n11ttttHHHn"Httn1tttnttttn11tt1nttt111mn~nottC1~!1~ttttnnmnnin AREA TIDINGS LONDON f.NID SOUTHERi1 AREA J.rea Sec. - Peter Lemmey9 Nvo i; Redgrave Roadq Putney9 SW15o MARCH MEm!lm The 1974 Annual Ge.i.erel