Arxiv:2104.07559V1 [Cond-Mat.Str-El] 15 Apr 2021
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Hydrodynamics of quantum spin liquids Vir B. Bulchandani,1 Benjamin Hsu,2 Christopher P. Herzog,3 and S. L. Sondhi4 1Princeton Center for Theoretical Science, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA 2Amazon Web Services, Inc., Seattle, WA 98109∗ 3Mathematics Department, King's College London, The Strand, London, WC2R 2LS, UK 4Department of Physics, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA (Dated: April 16, 2021) Quantum spin liquids are topological states of matter that arise in frustrated quantum magnets at low temperatures. At low energies, such states exhibit emergent gauge fields and fractionalized quasiparticles and can also possess enhanced global symmetries compared to their parent microscopic Hamiltonians. We study the consequences of this emergent gauge and symmetry structure for the hydrodynamics of quantum spin liquids. Specifically, we analyze two cases, the U(1) spin liquid with a Fermi surface and the SU(4)-symmetric \algebraic" spin liquid. We show that the emergent degrees of freedom in the spin liquid phase lead to a variety of additional hydrodynamic modes compared to the high-temperature paramagnetic phase. We identify a hydrodynamic regime for the internal U(1) gauge field common to both states, characterized by slow diffusion of the internal transverse photon. I. INTRODUCTION tools based on tensor-network methods13{15 yield quan- titative predictions in remarkable agreement with ex- 16{18 Hydrodynamics provides a universal description of the perimental results . These studies complement new long-wavelength, low-frequency dynamics of physical sys- theoretical methods for deriving hydrodynamics from 19,20 tems as they approach a state of thermal equilibrium. the AdS-CFT correspondence , random quantum cir- 21{23 24,25 This dynamics is typically determined by a handful of cuits and effective field theory . classical partial differential equations, whose structure is In this paper, we explore the linear-response hydrody- dictated by the symmetries of the system at hand. The namics of quantum spin liquids. These unusual topolog- physical insight underlying this enormous reduction in ical states of matter arise in frustrated quantum mag- complexity is the notion of a \conservation law": only lo- nets at low temperatures and exhibit non-trivial low- cal physical quantities that are conserved in every single energy degrees of freedom26,27. These degrees of free- microscopic collision can give rise to cumulative effects dom include fractionalized quasiparticles with enlarged that are discernible on macroscopic scales. Hydrodynam- flavour symmetries, and internal gauge fields coupled to ics in this sense is equally applicable to both quantum these quasiparticle degrees of freedom. This enhanced and classical systems. Although the emergence of hy- low-energy structure can give rise to an elaborate struc- drodynamics in many-body classical systems has been ture of hydrodynamic slow modes compared to the high- appreciated for centuries, its emergence in many-body temperature paramagnetic phase|even though neither quantum systems is less well understood. Some notable phase breaks any symmetries of the microscopic Hamil- exceptions include the theory of transport in metals and tonian. The extra modes come in part from the emergent liquid helium-3, as based on Landau's Fermi liquid pic- gauge fields and thus an emergent magnetohydrodynam- ture1,2, and the theory of superfluidity in weakly inter- ics and in part from the new global flavour symmetries. acting Bose gases3,4. We illustrate this behaviour by focusing on two repre- The idea that hydrodynamics might be a useful tool sentative examples of quantum spin liquid states, namely for understanding dynamics in a much broader range of the U(1) spin liquid with a Fermi surface, that is conjec- quantum systems has only come into focus comparatively tured to describe the uniform resonating valence bond recently. Simultaneous advances in various experimen- (RVB) state of the square-lattice Heisenberg antiferro- tal and theoretical directions have provided an intense magnet27, and the SU(4)-symmetric \algebraic" spin liq- stimulus for the study of hydrodynamics in many-body uid, that describes its \d-wave" RVB state28. While quantum systems. One active field of inquiry focuses on arXiv:2104.07559v1 [cond-mat.str-el] 15 Apr 2021 these are much studied spin liquids and hence appro- high-mobility two-dimensional electron gases, for which priate objects of further investigation, our focus on these a long-anticipated regime of viscous electron flow5{7 has two dimensional examples compels us to address an addi- recently been realized in materials such as graphene8 and tional subtlety arising from microscopic compactness of 9 PdCoO2 . Another rapidly growing field is the hydrody- the emergent gauge field. This is the fact that spin liq- namics of one-dimensional quantum systems, for which uid states in two dimensions and at non-zero temperature analytical tools based on integrability10{12 and numerical are unstable at the longest length and time scales, since the possibility of topological excitations of the internal gauge field ultimately leads to spinon confinement2829. Thus the question arises of whether quantum spin liq- ∗ Work done while the author was at Princeton University. uids in two dimensions exhibit a hydrodynamic regime 2 at all. We argue below that such a regime indeed exists, surface is neither Galilean nor Lorentz invariant, and provided that monopole operators in 2+1 dimensions are there are no internal symmetries beyond the emergent sufficiently irrelevant, as has been conjectured for both U(1) symmetry. Meanwhile, the field theory describing the U(1) spin liquid with a Fermi surface30 and Dirac spin the algebraic spin liquid is Lorentz invariant, quantum liquid states with many fermion flavours31. We find that critical, and exhibits multiple quasiparticle flavours with despite their fundamental differences, the internal U(1) an internal SU(4) symmetry. gauge symmetry common to both these states gives rise Despite these differences, both spin liquid states ex- to a diffusive hydrodynamic mode of the internal trans- hibit various hydrodynamic features in common, most verse photon, that is a spin-liquid analogue of magnetic notably a diffusive transverse mode of the internal gauge diffusion in ordinary conductors32,33. photon. In physical terms, this corresponds to an ex- citation of the internal magnetic field b, and therefore couples to the \spin chirality" P = S1 · S2 × S3 about II. GENERALITIES a plaquette, that has been the focus of earlier propos- als for experimental detection of spin liquid states35{38. A. Models We now review the standard hydrodynamics of the high- temperature phase. For concreteness, consider the family of antiferromag- netic, spin-1=2 Heisenberg models on a square, two- dimensional lattice, B. High-temperature hydrodynamics X H = J Si · Sj + :::; (1) In the high-temperature, paramagnetic phase, the hy- hiji drodynamic modes correspond to the na¨ıve conservation laws of the model, namely energy and the three compo- where the ellipsis denotes terms consistent with both lat- nents of spin, tice symmetry and SU(2) symmetry. At high temper- atures, such models will exhibit standard paramagnetic @tnE + r · jE = 0; (3) α α behaviour. At low temperatures, they can potentially @tnS + r · jS = 0; α = 1; 2; 3: (4) host a variety of spin liquid phases that depend on the microscopic details of the model in question. The field In a given equilibrium state, the expectation values of theory of these states can be studied with the aid of slave- the particle currents vanish, so that the linear response fermion variables34 behaviour of the currents near equilibrium is given by the constitutive relations 1 X Sj = f y σj f ; (2) i 2 iα αβ iβ α,β δjE = −DEErδnE; (5) α α δjS = −DSSrδnS; α = 1; 2; 3: (6) which yield an exact rewriting subject to the single- P y occupancy constraint α fiαfiα = 1. Various \spin liq- to leading order in a derivative expansion; these are de- uid" saddle points may then be studied at the level of coupled by symmetry. Thus the paramagnetic phase ex- mean-field theory. Physics in the vicinity of these saddle hibits four diffusive hydrodynamic modes in total, with points is characterized by the emergence of fractionalized dispersion excitations and dynamical gauge fields associated with 2 these excitations. One question that has not been stud- i!E = DEEk ; (7) ied systematically is how far these additional excitations 2 i!Sα = DSSk ; α = 1; 2; 3: (8) and enhanced symmetries lead to novel signatures in the hydrodynamics of quantum spin liquids, compared to the One might ask how far interaction effects, that appear high-temperature paramagnetic regime. in hydrodynamics as nonlinear corrections to the consti- This is the question we address below, focusing on two tutive relations, can modify this na¨ıve picture of normal representative examples of spin liquid states, the U(1) diffusion. For example, the leading nonlinear corrections spin liquid with a Fermi surface, corresponding to the to Eqs. (5) and (6) (note that simple total derivatives, 39 uniform RVB , or \zero flux state", of the Heisenberg e.g. δnErδnE, do not generate hydrodynamic tails ) model27, and the SU(4)-symmetric algebraic spin liquid, have the form corresponding to the d-wave RVB, or \staggered flux 31 α α (2) α state" . For each of these states, there is an effective δjS = −DSSrδnS − DSESδnErδnS + : : : ; α = 1; 2; 3: low-energy field theory description consisting of multiple spinon degrees of freedom minimally coupled to a dy- Such nonlinear corrections lead to long-time tails namical, non-compact, U(1) gauge field. However, the hJ (t)J i ∼ 1=td=2+1 in the current autocorrelation func- physics of these two effective theories is very different. tions of diffusing charges39 and tails ∼ 1=td=2 for ballistic The field theory describing the spin liquid with a Fermi ones40. In two dimensions, nonlinear diffusive corrections 3 are nonsingular (/ !) as ! ! 0+, while nonlinear ballis- try holds approximately, so that the gauge field a may tic corrections give rise to weak (logarithmic) finite-size be modelled as non-compact, while the spinon degrees dependence of transport coefficients40.