Communications Satellite Systems Operations with the Space Station

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Communications Satellite Systems Operations with the Space Station NASA CR179527 COMMUNICATIONS SATELLITE SYSTEMS OPERATIONS WITH THE SPACE STATION VOLUME II- TECHNICAL REPORT FEBRUARY 1987 NASA Lewis Research Center Contract No.NAS3-24253 =i!i211iiiiiiii!iJ!i;!'i:_:',-. I__d (_ Ford Aerospace& Communications Corporation (_ASA-C_- 179527) CCM_UNICA_IC_Z 5 AT_LLITE _87- 174_3 SYSTEMS OP£RA216N_ _I_H _SE S_C£ S IATICN, _£LUME 2 P inal Eeport, Jul. 1965 - Sep. I&65 (Ford Aezo_Face and Communications Unclas Corp.) 150 p CSCL 12B G3/6b q375; NASA Contract No. NAS3-24253 COMMUNICATIONS SATELLITE SYSTEMS OPERATIONS WITH THE SPACE STATION Volume II: TECHNICAL REPORT February 1987 Prepared by FORD AEROSPACE & COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION Western Development Laboratory Division Spacecraft Systems Operation, Advanced Systems Department 3939 Fabian Way, Palo Alto CA 94303 COOPERS & LYBRAND 1800 M St. NW, Washington DC 20036 Program Manager: Kent M. Price Major Contributors: John Dixson John Egan (C&L) Michael Kanfer (C&L) F. L. Limburg Larry Spanier Chuck Weyandt Steve Wright Prepared for NASA, Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH 44135 ABSTRACT The NASA Space Station has the potential to provide significant economic benefits to commercial communications satemte operators. This report gives the results of a study to quantify the benefits of new space-based activities and to assess the impacts on the satellite design and the Space Station. The following study results are described: • A financial model is developed which describes quantitatively the economics of the space segment of communication satellite systems. The model describes the economic status of the system throughout the lifetime of the satellite. The economic performance is output in terms of total capital cost and rate of return on investment. • The expected state-of-the-art status of communications satellite systems and operations be- ginning service in 1995 is assessed and described. The results of the assessment are utilized to postulate and describe representative satellite systems. • New or enhanced space-based activities and associated satellite system designs that have the potential to achieve future communications satellite operations in geostationary orbit with improved economic performance are postulated and defined. These activities include retrieval, orbital transfer vehicle (OTV) launch, deployment of appendages, checkout, fueling, assembly, and servicing of satellites. The financial model is used to determine the economic performance of these different activities and combinations of activities. The use of the space-based OTV to transport satellites from low earth orbit to geostationary orbit offers the greatest economic benefit. • Three scenarios using combinations of space-based activities are analyzed: (1) a spin stabilized satellite, (2) a three axis satellite, and (3) assembly at the Space Station and GEO servicing. The economic performance of the scenarios is analyzed. • Functional and technical requirements placed on the Space Station by the scenarios are de- tailed. Requirements on the satellites are also listed. The major study results are as follows: 1. Economic benefits are realizable for the commercial communications satellite industry with use of the Space Station. / 2. A space-based OTV is necessary to carry out APOs in a timely and cost-effective manner. 3. A study of the economics of retrieval missions and the influence of retrieval on the insurance industry is required in order to ac_urately demonstrate the value of retrievability for the satellite. Further NASA-sponsored study of a modular satellite design capable of being assembled in LEO (at the Space Station) and serviced in GEO is required. Sp (_+._+'_ 1_._1 ........... "._.-1 -¢'.... +^11:+^ " " _1.^..1..1 T.^ :_+_11^_1 .... :1..1^ to demonstrate NASA commitment. TABLE of CONTENTS SECTION I - INTRODUCTION Background I- 1 Objectives of Study I-1 Approach I- 1 3.1 Task 1. Develop Communications Satellite Financial Model .............. I- 1 3.1.1 Task 1A: Develop Basic Financial Model ..................... I- 1 3.1.2 Task 1B: Assess Impact of System Characteristics on Financial Model Output I- 2 3.2 Task 2. Determine Economic Performance of Business-as-Usual Scenario for 1995 . I- 2 3.3 Task 3. Assess Economics of New Space-Based Activities for 1995 .......... I - 2 3.3.1 Task 3A: Postulate New Space-Based APOs ................... I- 2 3.3.2 Task 3B: Evaluate Economics of APOs ...................... I- 2 3.4 Task 4. Develop Space Station Scenarios and Requirements .............. I- 2 4 Organization of Report I - 3 SECTION II - FINANCIAL MODEL Introduction II- 1 Model Assumptions II - 1 2.1 System Characteristics ................................... II - 1 2.1.1 C-Band Satellite .................................. II- 1 2.1.2 Ku-Band Satellite ................................. II-4 2.1.3 Hybrid Satellite ................................... II- 4 2.2 Capital Expenditures .................................... II - 4 2.2.1 Satellite Costs ................................... II - 7 2.2.2 Perigee Stage Costs ................................ II- 7 2.2.3 STS Launch Costs ................................. II-8 2.2.4 Launch and Mission Operations .......................... II- 8 2.2.5 Launch Insurance .................................. II- 8 2.2.6 Payment Schedules ................................. II- 8 2.3 Revenues .......................................... II - 9 2.3.1 Characteristics of Transponder .......................... II - 9 2.3.2 Degradation of Satellite .............................. II - 10 2.3.3 Market Factors ................................... II- 10 2.3.4 Price of Transponder ................................ II - 11 2.3.5 Utilization of Transponder ............................. II - 11 2.4 Operating Expenditures .................................. II - 11 2.4.1 Life Insurance .................................... II- 12 2.4.2 Other Expenditures ................................ II- 12 2.4.3 Rate of Inflation .................................. II- 12 2.4.4 TT&C ........................................ II- 12 2.5 Financing Assumptions .................................. II- 12 2.5.1 Balance Sheet Financing .............................. II- 12 2.5.2 Period of Financing ................................ If- 12 2.5.3 InterestRates .................................... II-12 2,6 Tax Assumptions ...................................... II- 13 2.6.1 Investment Tax Credit ............................... II- 13 2.0.2 Depredation .................................... if- i3 2.6.3 Marginal Tax Rate ................................. II- 13 3 Financial Analysis II - 13 3.1 Net Present Value ..................................... II- 13 3.2 InternalKate of Return .................................. II- 14 3.3 Dual Terminal Rate of Return ............................... If- 14 3.4 Other FinancialEvaluations ................................ If- 15 4 Model User Manual II - 15 4.1 Introduction ......................................... II- 15 4.2 Accessing the Model .................................... II- 15 4.2.1 Main Menu ..................................... II-15 4.3 Model Inputs ........................................ II- 15 4.3.1 General Assumptions Menu ............................ II- 16 4.3.2 Financing and Tax Menu ............................. II- 16 4.3.3 Capital Expenditures and Operating Assumptions Menu ............ If- 17 4.4 RecalculateSpreadsheet .................................. II- 17 4.5 Printthe Spreadsheet ................................... II- 17 4.5.1 Model Output ................................... II-17 4.5.2 Print Options .................................... II- 18 4.6 Save and Exit Spreadsheet ................................. II- 18 4.7 Use of Model ........................................ II- 18 Model Outputs for 1985 Satellites II - 19 5.1 C-band Satellite ...................................... II- 19 5.2 Ku-band Satellite.......................... ............ If-19 5.3 Hybrid Satellite.......................... _............. II- 19 5.4 Discussion.......................................... II- 20 SECTION III - IMPACT OF SYSTEM CHARACTERISTICS ON ECONOMICS 1 Introduction III- 1 2 Choice of Characteristics III- 1 2.1 Channel Capacity ...................................... Ill- 1 2.2 SatelliteLink Equation ................................... Ill- 1 2.2.1 Downlink Communications ............................ Ill- 2 °.* 111 2.2.2 Uplink Communications .............................. III- 2 2.2.3 Technical Characteristics ............................. III-2 2.3 Atmospheric Attenuation ................................. III- 3 2.4 Regulatory Considerations ................................. III- 3 2.4.1 Interference ..................................... III- 3 2.4.2 Ground Antenna Sidelobes ............................ III-3 2.4.3 Power Flux Density Limits ............................ III-3 Primary Characteristics III- 4 3.1 Communications Capacity ................................. III- 5 3.2 Bandwidth of Channel ................................... III- 5 3.2..1 C-Band Channel Bandwidth ........................... III- 5 3.2.2 Ku-Band Channel Bandwidth ........................... III- 6 3.3 Frequency Band of Operation ............................... III- 6 3.4 Power Transmitted in Channel .............................. III- 6 3.4.1 Impact on Satellite ................................. III- 7 3.4.2 EIttP ........................................ IH- 7 3.5 Utilization .......................................... III- 7 4 Secondary Characteristics III - 8 4.1
Recommended publications
  • Descendants of Joseph Randolph
    Descendants of Joseph Randolph Generation 1 1. JOSEPH 1 RANDOLPH was born in 1750 in Spotsylvania County, VA. He died in 1810 in SC or GA. He married NANCY TURMAN . Notes for Joseph Randolph: Was a private in Revolutionary War. Joseph Randolph and Nancy Turman had the following child: 2. i. PEYTON SKIPWITH 2 RANDOLPH was born in 1792 in VA. He died on Jan 19, 1867. He married ELIZABETH FIELDS . She was born in 1796. She died on Apr 13, 1873. Generation 2 2. PEYTON SKIPWITH 2 RANDOLPH (Joseph 1) was born in 1792 in VA. He died on Jan 19, 1867. He married ELIZABETH FIELDS . She was born in 1796. She died on Apr 13, 1873. Notes for Peyton Skipwith Randolph: Died of pneumonia Notes for Elizabeth Fields: Died of pneumonia Peyton Skipwith Randolph and Elizabeth Fields had the following child: 3. i. PEYTON CALLAHAN 3 RANDOLPH was born on May 11, 1832. He died on Dec 03, 1893. He married Sarah Wallis Gilbert on Nov 15, 1869. She was born on Dec 17, 1839 in Saulsbury, TN. She died on Nov 02, 1931 in Mississippi. Generation 3 3. PEYTON CALLAHAN 3 RANDOLPH (Peyton Skipwith 2, Joseph 1) was born on May 11, 1832. He died on Dec 03, 1893. He married Sarah Wallis Gilbert on Nov 15, 1869. She was born on Dec 17, 1839 in Saulsbury, TN. She died on Nov 02, 1931 in Mississippi. Peyton Callahan Randolph and Sarah Wallis Gilbert had the following children: i. BENJAMIN FRANKLIN 4 RANDOLPH was born on Apr 07, 1870.
    [Show full text]
  • Sts-51G Press Kit June 1985
    NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION SPACE SHUTTLE MISSION STS-51G PRESS KIT JUNE 1985 ARABSAT A; MORELOS A; TELSTAR 3-D; SPARTAN 1 Edited by Richard W. Orloff, 01/2001/Page 1 STS-5IG INSIGNIA S85-31266 -- The STS-51G insignia illustrates the advances in aviation technology in the United States within a relatively short span of the twentieth century. The flags of the French (Baudry) and Saudi Arabian (Al-Saud) payload specialists appear next to their name at the bottom of the insignia. The NASA insignia design for space shuttle flights is reserved for use by the astronauts and for other official use as the NASA Administrator may authorize. Public availability has been approved only in the form of illustrations by the various news media. When and if there is any change in this policy, which we do not anticipate, it will be publicly announced. PHOTO CREDIT: NASA or National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Edited by Richard W. Orloff, 01/2001/Page 2 RELEASE NO: 85-8 June 1985 CONTACTS Charles Redmond/Sarah Keegan Headquarters, Washington, DC (Phone: 202/453-8590) James Elliott Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD (Phone: 301/344-6256) David Alter Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX (Phone: 713/483-5111) Jim Ball Kennedy Space Center, FL (Phone: 305/867-2468) Ralph Jackson Dryden Flight Research Facility, Edwards, CA (Phone: 805/258-8381) Edited by Richard W. Orloff, 01/2001/Page 3 RELEASE NO: 85-83 June 1985 CONTENTS GENERAL RELEASE 5 51-G BRIEFING SCHEDULE 7 GENERAL INFORMATION 8 SHUTTLE MISSION 51-G -- QUICK LOOK FACTS
    [Show full text]
  • COMSAT Technical Review
    COMSAT Technical Review Volume 17 Number 1, Spring 1987 Advisory Board Joseph V. Charyk COMSAT TECHNICAL REVIEW John V. Evans Spring 1987 Editorial Board Geoffrey Hyde, Chairman Volume 17 Number 1 , Richard A. Arndt Ali E. Atia S. Joseph Campanella I DESIGN AND MODELING OF A GaAs MONOI.I'THIC 2- TO 6-GHz Dattakumar M. Chitre R. K. Gupta , .1. H. Reynolds, Russell J. Fang FEEDBACK AMPLIFIER Howard W. Flieger M. C. Fu , AND T. Heikkila Melvyn Grossman 23 A 120-Mbit/s TDMA QPSK MODEM FOR ON-BOARD APPLICATIONS Ivor N. Knight , AND F. T. Assal Larry C. Palmer R. G. Egri , K. Karimullab Edward E. Reinhart 55 AN ADAPTIVE EQUALIZER FOR 120-Mblt/s QPSK TRANSMISSION David V. Rogers Hans J. Weiss J. M. Kappes Albert E. Williams 87 MODULATION SELECTION FOR ILL MOBILE SATELI,FI'F EXPERIMENT Pier L. Bargellini, Editor Emeritus (MSAT-X) K. M. Mackenthun Editorial Staff MANAGING EDITOR Margaret B. Jacocks 105 HURWrrZ STABII .II'Y ANALYSIS OF AN ADPCM SYSTEM TECHNICAL EDITORS S. Dimolitsas AND U. Bhaskar Barbara J. Wassell Diane Haugen APPROXIMATIONS FOR THE RAISED COSINE FILTER PRODUCTION 127 POLE-ZERO J. J. Poklemba Barbara J. Wassell FAMILY Louis P. Stephens, Jr. 159 A SIMULATION STUDY OF RAIN ATTENUATION AND DIVERSITY EFFECTS CIRCULATION LINKS J. Mass Shirley H. Taylor ON SATELLITE COMSAT TECHNICAL REVIEW is published twice a year by 189 PROGRAMMABL E CONVOLUTIONAL ENCODER AND THRESHOLD Communications Satellite Corporation (COMSAT). Subscriptions, DECODER J. S. Snyder which include the two issues published within a calendar year, are: one year, $15 U.S.; two years, $25; three years, $35; 201 CTR NOTE : GEOSTATIONARY SATELLITE LOG FOR YEAR END 1986 single copies, $10; article reprints, $2.50.
    [Show full text]
  • SPACE APPLICATIONS **DB Chap 2 (09-56) 1/17/02 2:15 PM Page 11
    **DB Chap 2 (09-56) 1/17/02 2:15 PM Page 9 CHAPTER TWO SPACE APPLICATIONS **DB Chap 2 (09-56) 1/17/02 2:15 PM Page 11 CHAPTER TWO SPACE APPLICATIONS Introduction From NASA’s inception, the application of space research and tech- nology to specific needs of the United States and the world has been a pri- mary agency focus. The years from 1979 to 1988 were no exception, and the advent of the Space Shuttle added new ways of gathering data for these purposes. NASA had the option of using instruments that remained aboard the Shuttle to conduct its experiments in a microgravity environ- ment, as well as to deploy instrument-laden satellites into space. In addi- tion, investigators could deploy and retrieve satellites using the remote manipulator system, the Shuttle could carry sensors that monitored the environment at varying distances from the Shuttle, and payload special- ists could monitor and work with experimental equipment and materials in real time. The Shuttle also allowed experiments to be performed directly on human beings. The astronauts themselves were unique laboratory ani- mals, and their responses to the microgravity environment in which they worked and lived were thoroughly monitored and documented. In addition to the applications missions conducted aboard the Shuttle, NASA launched ninety-one applications satellites during the decade, most of which went into successful orbit and achieved their mission objectives. NASA’s degree of involvement with these missions varied. In some, NASA was the primary participant. Some were cooperative mis- sions with other agencies. In still others, NASA provided only launch support.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554
    DA 96-713 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Assignment of Orbital Locations to Space Stations in the Domestic Fixed-Satellite Service In the Matter of the Applications of AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND File Nos. 62-SAT-AMEND-95 TELEGRAPH COMPANY 63-SAT-P/LA-95 64 -SAT-P/LA-95 65-SAT-P/LA-95 ECHOSTAR SATELLITE 36-DSS-LA-94 CORPORATION 37-DSS-P/LA-94 154-SAT-AMEND-95 GE AMERICAN 69-SAT-P/LA-95 COMMUNICATIONS 70-SAT-P/LA-95 71-SAT-P/LA-95 HUGHES COMMUNICATIONS 5-DSS-P/LA-95 GALAXY, INC. 67-SAT-AMEND-95 68-SAT-P/LA-95 LORAL SPACE AND 72-SAT-P/LA-95 COMMUNICATIONS LTD. 73-SAT-P/LA-95 137-SAT-P-95 ORION NETWORK 74-SAT-P/LA-95 SYSTEMS, INC. ORDER AND AUTHORIZATIONS Adopted: May 7, 1996 Released: May 7, 1996 By the Chief, International Bureau: 13788 Introduction 1. By this Order, we authorize - without opinion - the construction, launch, and operation of eleven satellites and assign them to orbit locations. 1 These satellites will allow existing licensees to expand their systems and provide several new entrants with an opportunity to compete in the satellite market. The satellites will provide a wide range of domestic and international services well into the next decade. 2. We have issued these authorizations and assignments without opinion in an attempt to eliminate the unnecessary delay and uncertainty often associated with the licensing process. We will issue separate opinions addressing the merits of each application in detail within 30 days of the release of this Order.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    DA 96-1942 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of the Applications of AT&T CORP. File Nos. 48-DSS-LA-94 62-SAT-AMEND-95 63-SAT-P/LA-95 For Authority to Construct, Launch, and 64-SAT-P/LA-95 Operate Space Stations in the Domestic 65-SAT-P-95 Fixed-Satellite Service MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: November 20, 1996 Released: November 21, 1996 By the Chief, International Bureau: Introduction 1. On May 7, 1996, we authorized the construction, launch, and operation of eleven satellites in the domestic fixed-satellite ("domsat") service and assigned them to satellite orbit locations, 1 with separate opinions addressing the merits of each application to follow. We issue this MO&O for the authorizations granted to AT&T Corp. to construct, launch, and operate two hybrid C-/Ku-band2 domestic fixed-satellites at the 93 W.L. and 69 W.L. orbital positions, and to construct one on-ground spare. These authorizations both partially replace and expand AT&T©s satellite capacity and allow it to meet growing customer requirements, while contributing to increased competition in the market for satellite services. See Assignment of Orbital Locations to Space Stations in the Domestic Fixed-Satellite Service, DA 96-713 (May 7, 1996) ("May 7 Order"). For purposes of this opinion, the C-band encompasses the 3700-4200/5925-6425 MHz frequency bands; the Ku-band encompasses the 11.7-12.2/14.0-14.5 GHz bands. 15038 Background 2. In its application, AT&T requested authority to construct, launch, and operate three hybrid C-/Ku-band in-orbit satellites and to construct one on-ground spare.3 It identified the proposed satellites as Telstar 5, 6, 7, and 8, respectively.4 GE American Communications ("GE Americom") and Hughes Communications Galaxy, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Communications Satellite Systems Operations with the Space Station
    NASAC_t80875 COMMUNICATIONS SATELLITE SYSTEMS OPERATIONS WITH THE SPACE STATION VOLUME !il- SUPPLEMENTAR_ECHNICAL REPORT FEBRUARY 1988 ........................... NASA ......................... Lewis Research Center Contract No. NAS3-24253 ................. N88- 163cl4 ($ASA-C_- 180_ 75) CC_SU_ICA_I£ _S SAtELlitE 2¥STE_5 C_£_A_ICNS _I_E T_I EIAC£ S_ATICN° '_F.C.E_ICA_ %-CLrO_l£ 3: SU_ILE_EI_IAF_ BEPO_I Unclas _inal _e_ort, F_. - Eec. I cjf:3 (_o_d G3/18 01218/40 i _[_ace and Cc_=uricatic_.-" Cozy.) 221 P "_..__ PRIN_TON ..................... SYNERGETICS THE EGAN GROUP _ _or_ _,.ospac_ & _ J_ iNC. Communications Corporat_n II i_ Report Documentation Page Nat_al Aeronaut,s a_ 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. CR 180875 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date February 1988 Communications Satellite Systems Operations with the Space Station Volume III- Supplementary Technical 6. Perlorming Organization Coda REport 7. Author(s) B. Performing Organization Report No. K. M. Price, P. Russell, C. Weyandt 10. Work Unit No. 480-43-02 9. Performing Organization Name and Aodtess Ford Aerospace Corporation, Space Systems Division 11. Contract or Grant No. 3939 Fabian Way NAS3-24253 Pal o Alto CA 94303 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Final 12. S_n_ring Agency Name and Address Feb 1987 -- Dec 1987 NASA, Lewis Research Center 21,000 Brookpark Road 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Cleveland OH 44135 15 Supplementa_ Notes NASA Contract Technical Manager: Mr. Steven M. Stevenson Two other volumes: Vol. I Executive Summary (Feb 1987), CR 179526 Vol. Ii, Technical Report (Feb 1987), CR 179527 16. Abstract See Attached (page i) 17. Key Words (Suggested by Author(s)) 18 Distribution Statement communications satellites servicing of satellites satellite retrievability Publicly Available modular satellites space station 22, Price" 19.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA HISTORICAL DATA BOOK Volume VI
    Databook Front (IV) 1/17/02 12:20 PM Page i NASA SP-2000-4012 NASA HISTORICAL DATA BOOK Volume VI NASA Space Applications, Aeronautics and Space Research and Technology, Tracking and Data Acquisition/Support Operations, Commercial Programs, and Resources 1979–1988 Judy A. Rumerman The NASA History Series National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA History Office Office of Policy and Plans Washington, D.C. 2000 Databook Front (IV) 1/17/02 12:20 PM Page ii Library of Congress Cataloguing-in-Publication Data (Revised for Vol. 6) NASA historical data book. (The NASA historical series) (NASA SP ; 2000-4012) Vol. 1 is a republication of: NASA historical data book, 1958–1968. / Jane Van Nimmen and Leonard C. Bruno. Vol. 6 in series: The NASA history series. Includes bibliographical references and indexes. Contents: v. 1 NASA resources, 1958–1968 / Jane Van Nimmen and Leonard C. Bruno — v. 2. Programs and projects, 1958–1968 / Linda Neuman Ezell — v. 3. Programs and pro- jects, 1969—1978 / Linda Neuman Ezell — v. 4. NASA resources, 1969–1978 / Ihor Gawdiak with Helen Fedor — v. 5. NASA launch systems, space transportation, human spaceflight, and space science, 1979–1988 / Judy A. Rumerman — v. 6. NASA space applications, aeronautics and space research and technology, tracking and data acquisition/support operations, commercial programs, and resources, 1979–1988 / Judy A. Rumerman. 1. United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration—History. I. Van Nimmen, Jane. II. Bruno, Leonard C. III. Ezell, Linda Neuman. IV. Gawdiak, Ihor. V. Rumerman, Judy A. VI. Rumerman, Judy A. VII. Series. VIII. Series: NASA SP ; 2000-4012.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings, ITC/USA
    International Telemetering Conference Proceedings, Volume 16 (1980) Item Type text; Proceedings Publisher International Foundation for Telemetering Journal International Telemetering Conference Proceedings Rights Copyright © International Foundation for Telemetering Download date 26/09/2021 05:27:47 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/582034 INTERNATIONAL TELEMETERING CONFERENCE OCTOBER 14, 15, 16, 1980 SPONSORED BY INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR TELEMETERING CO-TECHNICAL SPONSOR INSTRUMENT SOCIETY OF AMERICA Bahia Hotel San Diego, California VOLUME XVI 1980 1980 INTERNATIONAL TELEMETERING CONFERENCE John B. Horton, General Chairman Frank Gerardi, Vice Chairman Dr. Fred Bond, Technical Program Chairman Eugene Ehrlich, Technical Program Chairman Alain Hackstaff, Exhibit Chairman Dr. Russell Seely, Publicity Chairman Francis Burns, Local Arrangement Chairman Dick Lytle, Financial Chairman Bob Klessig, ISF Representative Dr. B. H. Batson, ISA Representative Bruce Thyden, Golf Tournament Chairman Carolyn Lytle, Registration Chairman BOARD, INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR TELEMETERING H. F. Pruss, President V. W. Hammond, Vice President R. D. Bently, Secretary D. R. Andelin, Treasurer Ball Chin, Director F. Gerardi, Director T. J. Hoban, Director R. Klessig, Director W. A. Richardson, Director C. Weaver, Director 1980 ITC/USA Program Chairman Dr. F. E. Bond Program Chairman The decade of the 80’s is expected to herald an unprecedented advance in the state-of- the-art in electronics applications for telemetry, information processing and display, communications, and control. The role of satellites and the information sciences will continue to increase. Our program will examine the extent of these new developments including the technical, operational, and systems management aspects of their impact. The sessions cover a number of diverse fields of interest while highlighting the interaction between them.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical and Economic Feasibility of Telerobotic On-Orbit Satellite Servicing
    ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: TECHNICAL AND ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY OF TELEROBOTIC ON-ORBIT SATELLITE SERVICING Brook Rowland Sullivan, Doctor of Philosophy, 2005 Dissertation directed by: Professor David L. Akin Department of Aerospace Engineering Space Systems Laboratory University of Maryland The aim of this research is to devise an improved method for evaluating the techni- cal and economic feasibility of telerobotic on-orbit satellite servicing scenarios. Past, present, and future telerobotic on-orbit servicing systems and their key capabilities are examined. Previous technical and economic analyses of satellite servicing are re- viewed and evaluated. The standard method employed by previous feasibility studies is extended, developing a new servicing decision approach incorporating operational uncertainties (launch, docking, et cetera). Comprehensive databases of satellite char- acteristics and on-orbit failures are developed to provide input to the expected value evaluation of the servicing versus no-servicing decision. Past satellite failures are re- viewed and analyzed, including the economic impact of those satellite failures. Oppor- tunities for spacecraft life extension are also determined. Servicing markets of various types are identified and detailed using the results of the database analysis and the new, expected-value-based servicing feasibility method. This expected value market assessment provides a standard basis for satellite servicing decision-making for any proposed servicing architecture. Finally, the method is demonstrated by evaluating a proposed small, lightweight servicer providing retirement services for geosynchronous spacecraft. An additional benefit of the method is that it enables parametric analysis of the sensitivity of economic viability to the probability of docking success, thus establishing a threshold for that critical value.
    [Show full text]
  • Descendants of Willis Palmer
    Descendants of Willis Palmer Generation 1 1. WILLIS1 PALMER was born on Oct 19, 1792 in Abbeville, SC. He died on Nov 14, 1872 in Lebanon Community, MS. He married Elizabeth Ann Devall in 1820 in Abbeville, South Carolina, USA. She was born in 1798 in Abbeville, South Carolina, USA. She died in Mississippi. Willis Palmer and Elizabeth Ann Devall had the following children: 2. i. JOSHUA HILL2 PALMER was born on May 03, 1837 in Alabama. He died on Nov 24, 1882 in Lebanon Community, MS. He married Sarah Catherine Allen Duggar, daughter of Alexander Duggar and Reynolds, on Sep 02, 1859. She was born on Mar 08, 1846 in Itawamba, Mississippi, USA. She died on Sep 26, 1926 in Lebanon Community, MS. 3. ii. JAMES PALMER was born in South Carolina. He married SUSAN DAVIS. iii. FRANCES PALMER. iv. EPP PALMER. v. ANN PALMER. vi. JANE PALMER. She died on May 10, 1914. Generation 2 2. JOSHUA HILL2 PALMER (Willis1) was born on May 03, 1837 in Alabama. He died on Nov 24, 1882 in Lebanon Community, MS. He married Sarah Catherine Allen Duggar, daughter of Alexander Duggar and Reynolds, on Sep 02, 1859. She was born on Mar 08, 1846 in Itawamba, Mississippi, USA. She died on Sep 26, 1926 in Lebanon Community, MS. Notes for Joshua Hill Palmer: Moved to Bethany, January 22, 1866. Raised his home January 24. It is the Thompson house moved near the Davis patch. Was a tenant farmer on Parson Agnew's land. Parson Agnew kept a diary of happenings in the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Communications Commission Record DA 89·1684
    5 FCC Red No. 2 Federal Communications Commission Record DA 89·1684 DALLAS/FORT WORTH CSG-89-150-ML Before the TELEPORT, LTD. Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 Application for authority modify its license for a fixed 6.1-meter GROUPW CSG-89-093-ML Ku-band transmit/receive domestic TELEVISION, earth station (Call Sign E873895) INC. at Irving, Texas for the provision of private, non-common carrier Application for authority to international communications services modify its fixed 7.0-meter via the PAS system Ku-band transmit/receive domestic fixed earth HUGHES NETWORK CSG-89-146-ML(2) station (Call Sign E890522) SYSTEMS, INC. CSG-89-147-ML(2) at Stamford, Connecticut to add PAS-1 as a point of Applications for authority to modify communication and to provide its licenses for 2.4, 1.8. 1.2 and international communications 3.5-meter Ku-band transmit/receive between the United States VSAT earth stations (Call Signs E873438, and those points to which E861092, E891001 and E891002) for the PAS is authorized to serve provision of services between the United States and Canada, Mexico WESTINGHOUSE CSG-89-122-ML and Latin America COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, MOBILE CSG-89-151-ML(4)(A) INC: SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS, Application for authority to INC. modify its fixed 4.5-meter d/b/a/ PITTSBURGH C-band transmit/receive INTERNATIONAL domestic earth station (Call Sign TELEPORT E890928) at Miami; Florida for the provision of international services Application for authority to via all U.S. domestic satellites modify its licenses for a 5.6-meter hub at New Kensington, CRISA CSG-89-145-P/L Pennsylvania and 1.2, 1.8 and CORPORATION 2.4-meter Ku-band transmit/receive earth stations (Call Signs E890954, Application for authority to E890955, E890956 and E890957) for construct and operate a the provision of services between 3.7-meter Ku-band transmit/ the United States and Canada and receive fixed earth station Mexico via all U.S.
    [Show full text]