DOCSLIB.ORG

Scientists Who Believe the Bible Copyright 2011 by David W

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Scientists Who Believe the Bible Copyright 2011 by David W Scientists Who Believe the Bible Copyright 2011 by David W. Cloud Tis edition December 24, 2014 ISBN 978-1-58318-150-8 Tis book is published for free distribution in eBook format. It is available in PDF, MOBI (for Kindle, etc.), and ePUB formats from the Way of Life web site. We do not allow distribution of this book from other web sites. Published by Way of Life Literature PO Box 610368, Port Huron, MI 48061 866-295-4143 (toll free) - [email protected] www.wayofife.org Canada: Bethel Baptist Church 24212 Campbell St. N., London Ont. N6P 1A6 519-652-2619 Printed in Canada by Bethel Baptist Print Ministry ii Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................1 Scientists Who Believe the Bible .............................10 Paul Back .................................................................10 John Baumgardner ...................................................11 Jerry Bergman ..........................................................12 Phillip A. Bishop...................................................... 13 Edward Boudreaux ...................................................16 Walt T. Brown ..........................................................16 Stuart Burgess ..........................................................19 Ben Carson ...............................................................19 Robert Carter............................................................ 20 John Cimbala............................................................ 22 Lowell Coker............................................................ 23 Arthur Compton .......................................................24 Raymond Damadian................................................. 25 Karen Dawkins......................................................... 27 Don DeYoung ...........................................................28 Shem Dharampaul ....................................................29 John Doughty........................................................... 31 Geoff Downes ..........................................................32 Danny Faulkner........................................................ 33 Dwain Ford ..............................................................34 Wayne Frair ..............................................................34 Duane Gish............................................................... 34 Werner Gitt............................................................... 36 D. B. Gower .............................................................36 John J. Grebe ............................................................37 Stephen Grocott .......................................................38 iii Peter W. V. Gurney ..................................................38 John Hartnett............................................................ 40 Bob Hosken.............................................................. 41 James Hugg ..............................................................42 Russell Humphreys ..................................................44 Evan Jamieson.......................................................... 44 George Javor ............................................................45 Arthur Jones .............................................................45 Raymond Jones ........................................................46 Dean H. Kenyon....................................................... 47 John W. Klotz........................................................... 49 John Kramer .............................................................50 Walter Lammerts...................................................... 51 Atomic Chuan Tse Leow.......................................... 52 Jason Lisle ................................................................52 Richard Lumsden .....................................................53 Ian Macreadie........................................................... 57 John Mann................................................................ 57 George Marshall .......................................................60 Andrew McIntosh ....................................................61 John Marcus .............................................................62 Jobe Martin ..............................................................62 Joseph Mastropaolo.................................................. 64 Angela Meyer........................................................... 65 Colin Mitchell ..........................................................66 Henry Morris............................................................ 67 John Morris ..............................................................68 Terry Mortenson....................................................... 68 Gary Parker ..............................................................70 J. H. John Peet.......................................................... 73 William T. Pelletier ..................................................74 David Pennington..................................................... 74 iv Richard Porter ..........................................................75 Georgia Purdom .......................................................76 John Rankin.............................................................. 77 John Sanford ............................................................77 Jonathan Sarfati ........................................................78 Joe Sebeny ...............................................................79 Emil Silvestru........................................................... 79 Andrew Snelling....................................................... 80 Timothy Standish .....................................................81 David H. Stone .........................................................81 Bert Thompson......................................................... 84 Ker Thomson............................................................ 85 William J. Tinkle ......................................................85 Jeffrey Tomkins........................................................ 87 Walter Veith.............................................................. 87 Jeremy Walter........................................................... 88 Ernest Walton ...........................................................88 Keith Wanser ............................................................89 A. J. Monty White ....................................................89 A. E. Wilder-Smith................................................... 90 Jay Wile ....................................................................92 Bryant Wood ............................................................92 V. Wright ..................................................................92 Patrick Young ...........................................................93 Henry Zuill ...............................................................94 v Introduction High Schools, colleges, and universities typically teach only one theory of origins, that being evolution, and the students are not presented with a creationist or even an Intelligent Design viewpoint. In fact, they are ofen given the idea that no true scientist today is a creationist. Richard Dawkins, a brash atheist and anti-creationist, says: “Evolution is a fact. Beyond reasonable doubt, beyond serious doubt, beyond sane, informed, intelligent doubt, beyond doubt evolution is a fact. ... Evolution is a fact, and [my] book will demonstrate it. No reputable scientist disputes it, and no unbiased reader will close the book doubting it” (Dawkins, Te Greatest Show in Earth). “Tere is no doubt now; no serious scientist has any doubt that evolution is a fact, in the sense that we are cousins of chimpanzees, monkeys and wombats and cassowaries” (Dawkins, interview with COSMOS magazine, May 23, 2012). According to Dawkins, no reputable scientist disputes evolution, and if you do reject evolution, you are biased, unintelligent, and your sanity should be questioned. Consider some other examples of this view: “... no scientist denies the central truth of [Darwin’s] Te Origin, the idea of descent with modifcation ... plants, animals and everything else descended from a common ancestor” (Steve Jones, Professor of Genetics, University College of London, Darwin’s Ghost, 2000, pp. xvii, xxiii). “... no educated person any longer questions the validity of the so-called theory of evolution, which we now know to be a simple fact” (Ernst Mayr, professor of zoology, Harvard University, “Darwin’s Infuence on Modern Tought,” Te Best American Science Writing 2001, edited by Timothy Ferris, p. 141). 1 “Evolution is a fact and no educated scientist doubts it” (Gary Huxley, biologist, Brandt University, quoted by Paul McDorman, “Noted Evolutionist Says He Won’t Debate Creationists,” World by Design, 2011, p. 1). “In fact, all scientists accept the reality of evolution” (Joseph McInerney, director of Biological Sciences Curriculum Study, quoted by David Hill, “Counter Evolutionary,” Education Week, Nov. 20, 1996, p. 7). Bill Nye “the Science Guy” claims that the teaching of creation damages children and could harm the future of the U.S. economy by hindering critical thinking and stifing innovation (“Bill Nye: Debate over Evolution in Texas Schools Is Jeopardizing Our Future,” Huffington Post, Nov. 23, 2013). In fact, modern science was invented by men who believed in divine creation, so Bill Nye would need to show how that creationism hindered these men’s
Load more

Recommended publications
  • No Ears to Hear, but Eyes to See?
    Jehoiada Nesnaj NO EARS TO HEAR, BUT EYES TO SEE? 1 No ears to hear, but eyes to see? Special thanks to the parties mentioned below, that have copyrights on the presented images, for their co-operation and contribution, making them available for publication. Their individual names can show up at the bottom of every Google Earth image presented ; © DigitalGlobe, permission granted by email Thu, 1 May 2008, by Amy Opperman, Corporate Image Manager, DigitalGlobe, Longmont Colorado, USA © Europa Technologies, permission granted by email Wed, 20 Aug 2008, by Jayne Parker, Marcomms Manager, Europa Technologies Ltd., UK © Terrametrics, permission granted by email Wed, 7 May 2008, by Julie Baxes, Customer Support, TerraMetrics Inc., Littleton, CO, USA © Tracks4Africa, permission granted by email Wed, 7 May 2008, by Johann Groenewald, Tracks4Africa, Stellenbosch, Rep. of South Africa © Furthermore all copyrighted images in this book as well as cover- image are presented under granted permissions by all individual copyright claiming parties and the Google Earth Pro license key JCPMT45K7L65GHZ therefore free of any other copyright claims. Also special thanks to graphic-illustrator Gary McIntyre at [email protected] for that final touch of cover- and interior-design and the processing into printing formats required for publication. Copyright ©2008 Jehoiada Nesnaj All rights reserved ISBN 143822737X EAN-13 9781438227375 Visit www.noearstohear.com to order additional copies. 2 Jehoiada Nesnaj Jehoiada Nesnaj No ears to hear, but eyes to see? The greatest archaeological discovery ever on Google Earth 7x7 miles wide! Belgium, September 2008 3 No ears to hear, but eyes to see? 4 Jehoiada Nesnaj Table of Contents page 9 Chapter 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Download April 2002
    Vol. 31 No. 4 April 2002 PASSING THE TORCH OF CREATION A ONCE-IN-A-LIFETIME EVENT! Pastor Chuck Smith Dr. Tim LaHaye Dr. Duane Gish Dr. Henry Morris Pastor Chuck Smith, Dr. Tim LaHaye, Dr. young dropouts in the 60s he found that Duane Gish, and Dr. Henry Morris are evolution was a major hangup. He began teaming up for one of the most momen- giving away copies of a Henry Morris tous events since the modern creation book and saw many come to Christ. From movement began over 30 years ago. Pass- those humble beginnings has risen the ing the Torch of Creation is scheduled for worldwide Calvary Chapel movement. Saturday, May 18, 2002, at Calvary Dr. Tim LaHaye will be discussing the Chapel of Costa Mesa, at 3800 South dangers of Biblical compromise, the ne- Fairview Road in Santa Ana, California. cessity of standing firm on God’s Word, The central theme and purpose of this and how this perspective led to ICR’s unique conference is to prepare and ex- founding. Dr. LaHaye shared his vision hort future generations to proclaim the for a Christian college in San Diego with truth of creation and stand firm on God’s Henry Morris in 1969. Discussions Holy Word. These four senior statesmen turned to the need for a creationist advo- will be sharing their lifetime experiences cacy and research group. Thus the Insti- and passing on spiritual and tactical wis- tute for Creation Research was birthed dom for the twenty-first century. in 1970 as the science faculty of Chris- Pastor Chuck Smith will be speaking tian Heritage College.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shameful Wrong That Must Be Righted
    This Year’s Nobel Prize in Medicine The Shameful Wrong That Must Be Righted This year the committee that awards The Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine did the one thing it has no right to do: it ignored the truth. Eminent scientists, leading medical textbooks and the historical facts are in disagreement with the decision of the committee. So is the U. S. Patent Office. Even Alfred Nobel’s will is in disagreement. The com- mittee is attempting to rewrite history. The Nobel Prize Committee to Physiology or Medicine chose to award the prize, not to the medical doctor/research scientist who made the breakthrough discovery on which all MRI technology is based, but to two scientists who later made technological improvements based on his discovery. WHAT EMINENT SCIENTISTS AND AUTHORS SAY “I was stunned to learn that the Nobel Committee has apparently become so political that it is willing to overlook documented evidence (1971) for the first discovery of the substantial T1 and T2 tissue differences discovered by Damadian, which have become the foundation of all NMR imaging.”— John Throck Watson, Ph. D., Professor of Biochemistry and Chemistry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan "We are perplexed, disappointed and angry about the incomprehensible exclusion of Professor Raymond Damadian, M.D., from this year's Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. MRI's entire development rests on the shoulders of Damadian's discovery of NMR proton relaxation differences among normal and diseased tissues and his proposal of external scanning of NMR relaxation differences in the human body, published in Science in 1971” -— Eugene Feigelson, Senior Vice President for Biomedical Education and Research, Dean of the College of Medicine, Distinguished Service Professor, SUNY Downstate Medical Center "Egg on the Nobel for Medicine's face."— V.
    [Show full text]
  • Nasty Priority Disputes the Problem Is That the Scientific Reward System Often Does Not Get It Right
    BOOK REVIEW Nasty priority disputes The problem is that the scientific reward system often does not get it right. Meyers recounts many other stories in brief to illustrate the Prize Fight: The Race and the weaknesses of peer review, the inadequacies of processes by which Rivalry to be the First in Science prize winners are selected and the inaccuracies of merit systems that link scientific work to tenure, promotion, grants and prestige. In fact, Morton A. Meyers Meyers’s tales suggest that the reward system itself may be largely at Palgrave Macmillan, 2012 fault. The scientists portrayed here showed no signs early in their 262 pp., hardcover, $27.00 careers of being motivated by glory, fame and wealth. To the contrary, they were wildly excited about their discoveries and showed little inter- ISBN: 9780230338906 est in external rewards. It is only when their work began to show signs Reviewed by Melissa S Anderson of propelling them toward commercial success or consideration for major awards that the researchers’ motives became more complicated. Lead scientists then took steps to secure their own priority status at the expense of others. They began interpreting the events that led to their scientific breakthroughs in ways that emphasized their own roles Scientists are only human and research is messy. That is the central and minimized their collaborators’ contributions, making it difficult message of Morton A. Meyers’s Prize Fight: The Race and the Rivalry to to reconstruct the actual role each person had. For the most part, the be the First in Science, a lively account of scientists’ striving for recogni- stories in Meyers’s book have played out in the spotlight of celebrity, tion and credit for their discoveries.
    [Show full text]
  • Clark, Harold Willard (1891–1986)
    Clark, Harold Willard (1891–1986) JAMES L. HAYWARD James L. Hayward, Ph.D. (Washington State University), is a professor emeritus of biology at Andrews University where he taught for 30 years. He is widely published in literature dealing with ornithology, behavioral ecology, and paleontology, and has contributed numerous articles to Adventist publications. His book, The Creation-Evolution Controversy: An Annotated Bibliography (Scarecrow Press, 1998), won a Choice award from the American Library Association. He also edited Creation Reconsidered (Association of Adventist Forums, 2000). Harold Willard Clark was an Adventist biologist who taught for many years at Pacific Union College. He became well known among Seventh-day Adventists through his writings that defended young-earth creationism and Flood geology. Early Life and Education Harold Willard Clark Harold W. Clark was born near Sherbrooke, Quebec, Photo from Wikimedia Commons. Canada, on November 6, 1891, the eldest of four siblings. Until Harold was six his parents, Homer and Sarah (nee Gladden) Clark, managed a farm near Sherbrooke. Eventually the family moved to a second farm near South Corinth, Vermont, where Harold spent most of his childhood and adolescence. There he learned to tend livestock, plant and harvest corn and potatoes, put up hay, care for a family garden, and make maple syrup. He also developed a love for nature, in part by reading through a botany textbook by Harvard professor Asa Gray. During the spring and summer of his sixteenth year he enjoyed learning the names of local wild plants, a passion that would occupy the rest of his life.1 Career in Education At sixteen Harold passed Vermont’s teachers’ examinations, and was certified to teach elementary school, which he did for the next year and a half.
    [Show full text]
  • CREATION SCIENCE BIBLIOGRAPHY Ray Mondragon (10/17, Rev 4/19)
    CREATION SCIENCE BIBLIOGRAPHY Ray Mondragon (10/17, rev 4/19) Note: This bibliography contains mainly the books that refute the evolution worldview and support the creationist young-universe view. There are only a few books from the old-universe view as noted at the end. A few other resources have been added from Robby Dean after a 4/12/19 meeting as noted with an asterisk. CREATION vs. EVOLUTION Scientific Creationism, edited by Henry M. Morris, Institute for Creation Research, Master Books, 1974. Over 22 scientists with PhDs contribute a variety of scientific evidence supporting the creation view. Icons of Evolution: Science or Myth?, Jonathan Wells, Regnery Publishing, 2000. The main evidence supporting the theory of evolution, “icons,” are explained and effectively refuted. The Lie: Evolution, Ken Ham, Master Books, 1987. The theory of evolution is refuted more philosophically than evidentially for a general audience. Biblical Creationism: What Each Book of the Bible Teaches about Creation and the Flood, Henry Morris, Baker Book House, 1993. The entire Bible is surveyed for passages referring to creation or God as Creator. Man’s Origin, Man’s Destiny: A Critical Survey of the Principles of Evolution and Christianity, A. E. Wilder-Smith, Bethany Fellowship, Inc., 1975. A professor with PhDs in organic chemistry and medical science supports the creationist position from both science and Scripture. This is an older but still a useful work. * The Creation of Life: A Cybernetic Approach To Evolution. A. E. Wilder Smith. Older but very valuable work by a British scholar who has a Ph,D in organic chemistry, a Doctor of Science in Pharmaceuticals from the University of Geneva, and a third doctorate from the E.
    [Show full text]
  • Apologetic Resources
    APOLOGETIC RESOURCES A Young Earth ministry perspective, namely contrasting Scripture to true science now and during the ages. By Dr. Jim Pagels [email protected] 9/2016 Editor Dr. John Fricke, Emeritus Professor of Biology, Concordia University, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Copyright This book is offered as an educational resource on a no cost basis. Contents are not to be reproduced for the purpose of sale. Note that all Scriptural passages are taken from the English Standard Version. 1 I HAVE NO GREATER JOY THAN TO HEAR THAT MY CHILDREN WALK IN THE TRUTH III JOHN 1:4 Forward - Although there is much young Earth information available from commercial sources and on the internet, it was the impression of this writer that no resource that deals with basic topical issues correlating the young Earth philosophy and science exists for professional church workers. To this end, Apologetic Resources is being offered. Intended Audience – The intended audience of this reference material is primarily use by professional church workers, i.e., teachers, pastors, youth workers, etc., namely those who choose to uphold the literal interpretation of Genesis and the inerrancy of Holy Scripture. The focus in this regard is Young Earth Creationism and the catastrophic nature of the global Genesis Flood keeping in mind that Genesis 1-11 is foundational to most of the significant doctrines of Holy Scripture. Of course, laymen may well also find this reference a valuable resource. There is obviously a realistic interplay between Scripture, apologetics and true science. The goal of this document is to provide clarity to this interaction.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping the Creation-Evolution Debate in Public Life
    MAPPING THE CREATION-EVOLUTION DEBATE IN PUBLIC LIFE by ANDREW JUDSON HART (Under the Direction of Edward Panetta) ABSTRACT Evolution versus creation is a divisive issue as religion is pitted against science in public discourse. Despite mounting scientific evidence in favor of evolution and legal decisions against the teaching of creationism in public schools, the number of advocates who still argue for creationist teaching in the science curriculum of public schools remains quite large. Public debates have played a key role in the creationist movement, and this study examines public debates between creationists and evolutionists over thirty years to track trends and analyze differences in arguments and political style in an attempt to better understand why creationism remains salient with many in the American public. INDEX WORDS: Creation; Evolution; Public Debate; Argumentation; Political Style; Bill Nye MAPPING THE CREATION-EVOLUTION DEBATE IN PUBLIC LIFE by ANDREW JUDSON HART B.A., The University of Georgia, 2010 B.S.F.R., The University of Georgia, 2010 M.A.T., The University of Georgia, 2014 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF ARTS ATHENS, GEORGIA 2016 © 2016 Andrew Judson Hart All Rights Reserved MAPPING THE CREATION-EVOLUTION DEBATE IN PUBLIC LIFE by ANDREW JUDSON HART Major Professor: Edward Panetta Committee: Barbara Biesecker Thomas Lessl Electronic Version Approved: Suzanne Barbour Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia May 2016 iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project would not have been possible without Dr. Ed Panetta pushing me down the path to study the creation-evolution debates and his work with me on this through the many drafts and edits.
    [Show full text]
  • Answers to the Top 50 Questions About Genesis, Creation, and Noah's Flood
    ANSWERS TO THE TOP 50 QUESTIONS ABOUT GENESIS, CREATION, AND NOAH’S FLOOD Daniel A. Biddle, Ph.D. Copyright © 2018 by Genesis Apologetics, Inc. E-mail: [email protected] www.genesisapologetics.com A 501(c)(3) ministry equipping youth pastors, parents, and students with Biblical answers for evolutionary teaching in public schools. The entire contents of this book (including videos) are available online: www.genesisapologetics.com/faqs Answers to the Top 50 Questions about Genesis, Creation, and Noah’s Flood by Daniel A. Biddle, Ph.D. Printed in the United States of America ISBN-13: 978-1727870305 ISBN-10: 1727870301 All rights reserved solely by the author. The author guarantees all contents are original and do not infringe upon the legal rights of any other person or work. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form without the permission of the author. The views expressed in this book are not necessarily those of the publisher. Scripture taken from the New King James Version®. Copyright © 1982 by Thomas Nelson. Used by permission. All rights reserved. Print Version November 2019 Dedication To my wife, Jenny, who supports me in this work. To my children Makaela, Alyssa, Matthew, and Amanda, and to your children and your children’s children for a hundred generations—this book is for all of you. We would like to acknowledge Answers in Genesis (www.answersingenesis.org), the Institute for Creation Research (www.icr.org), and Creation Ministries International (www.creation.com). Much of the content herein has been drawn from (and is meant to be in alignment with) these Biblical Creation ministries.
    [Show full text]
  • Darwin Skeptics a Select List of Science Academics, Scientists, and Scholars Who Are Skeptical of Darwinism Compiled by Jerry Bergman Phd
    Darwin Skeptics A Select List of Science Academics, Scientists, and Scholars Who are Skeptical of Darwinism Compiled by Jerry Bergman PhD. http://www.rae.org/pdf/darwinskeptics.pdf , 24-8-2014 It is commonly claimed that no scientist rejects macroevolution or Darwinism (by which is meant evolutionary naturalism, or the view that variation caused by mutations plus natural selection accounts for all life forms). For example, Dr. Steve Jones, Professor of Genetics at University College of London, wrote that “no scientist denies the central truth of The Origin, the idea of descent with modification... plants, animals and everything else descended from a common ancestor” (Jones, 2000, pp. xvii, xxiii). Other writers avoid the words “all” or “no scientist” and claim instead that “almost no scientist” rejects Darwinism as defined above. In an article refuting “wiccan creationism,” the author claimed that evolutionary theory has been confirmed to such a high degree and has such great explanatory power that it is the central organizing principle of the biological sciences today. Modern biology is basically unthinkable outside of the context of evolution and that is why it is accepted without reservations by pretty much every working scientists [sic] in the life sciences. It also isn’t really questioned in the other natural sciences, either, like physics or chemistry. The author then makes the following absolutist statement: Evolution is taken as a fact—and while there might be disagreements about some of the details of how evolution proceeds, there are no disagreements about the idea that it does occur and that it is the explanation for the diversity of life on our planet.
    [Show full text]
  • Creation/Evolution
    Creation/Evolution Are the fossils in the wrong order for human evolution? Issue VIII CONTENTS Spring 1982 ARTICLES 1 Charles Darwin: A Centennial Tribute by H. lames Birx 11 Kelvin Was Not a Creationist by Stephen G Brush 14 Are There Human Fossils in the "Wrong Place" for Evolution by Ernest C. Conrad 23 Answers to Creationist Attacks on Carbon-14 Dating by Christopher Gregory Weber REPORTS .30 Creation-Evoiution Debates: Who's Winning Them Now? by Frederick Edwards 43 News Briefs LICENSED TO UNZ.ORG ELECTRONIC REPRODUCTION PROHIBITED FORTHCOMING PROGRAMS PBS TV Program, "Creation vs. Evolution: Battle in the Classroom," airing Wednesday, July 7, at 9:00 PM Eastern time. This sixty-minute documentary ex- plores the growing war of litigation over creationism in the public schools with interviews of teachers, scientists, religious, and political leaders, students, and parents in the forefront of the battle. The program particularly examines the "two-model" approach used recently in Livermore, California, and gets the reac- tions of the principal individuals involved. The basic ideas of creationism and evolution are argued in a "point-counterpoint" segment between Duane Gish and Russell Doolittle. The age of the earth and universe are covered. Other per- sonalities featured include: Tim LaHaye; James Robison; Richard Bliss; Nell, Kelly, and Casey Segraves; John N. Moore; Bill Keith; and even Ronald Reagan. A featured representative on the evolution side is William V. Mayer. The docu- mentary is a production of KPBS, San Diego. 1982 Annual Fellows' Meeting at Guilford College, August 8-13, Greensboro, North Carolina. Of the sixteen programs, one is entitled "Religion and Science: The Creationist Debate." Contact John O.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosopher Massimo Pigliucci the Graduate Center at the City University of New York, [email protected]
    Iowa State University Summer Symposium on 2012: Between Scientists & Citizens Science Communication Jan 1st, 12:00 AM Keynote Address—Nonsense on Stilts about Science: Field Adventures of a Scientist- Philosopher Massimo Pigliucci The Graduate Center at the City University of New York, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/sciencecommunication Part of the Other Rhetoric and Composition Commons, Rhetoric Commons, and the Speech and Rhetorical Studies Commons Pigliucci, Massimo (2012). Keynote Address—Nonsense on Stilts about Science: Field Adventures of a Scientist- Philosopher. Jean Goodwin (Ed.), Between Scientists & Citizens. https://doi.org/10.31274/sciencecommunication-180809-112 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences and Symposia at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Iowa State University Summer Symposium on Science Communication by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Keynote Address Nonsense on Stilts about Science: Field Adventures of a Scientist- Philosopher MASSIMO PIGLIUCCI Philosophy Program, The Graduate Center at the City University of New York 365 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10036 USA [email protected] ABSTRACT: Public discussions of science are often marred by two pernicious phenomena: a widespread rejection of scientific findings (e.g., the reality of anthropogenic climate change, the conclusion that vaccines do not cause autism, or the validity of evolutionary theory), coupled with an equally common acceptance of pseudoscientific notions (e.g., homeopathy, psychic readings, telepathy, tall tales about alien abductions, and so forth).
    [Show full text]