Murders Are People, Too

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Murders Are People, Too Murders Are People, Too Kari Allegretto Religion 113: Old Testament Dr. Knauth Fall 2007 person who knows of the Abrahamic in the fourth chapter of Genesis. If this is the A faiths knows of the story of the brothers case, then Cain created the job of farming. Cain and Abel. One of the reasons the fourth Abel became “a keeper of sheep” (Genesis chapter of Genesis fascinates readers is be- 4:2). While he created the post of a shepherd, cause of God’s treatment of Cain after the Abel’s job required no other acts of creation. murder of Abel. The story of Cain and Abel Cain’s job required the creating of farm land has an underlying message that murderers through plowing and the creation of vegeta- can also be creators. While one would expect tion through planting seeds. By caring for the God to heavily punish Cain and forfeit his life land, Cain raises plants from the dirt as God after he killed Abel, God continues to act the had created human life from the mud (Swen- part of a strict parental figure in Cain’s life and son 373). This creation of life appears to be a deals kindly with him, allowing him to live with connection between God and Cain. When and create a family. Cain is banished to a life of wandering from Cain is introduced in the Bible as “a the land for murdering his brother, he laments, tiller of soil” (Genesis 4:2), meaning that he “Today you have driven me from the soil, and became a farmer. This meant that Cain fol- I shall be hidden from your face” (Genesis lowed in the steps of his father, who became 4:14). Cain mourns the fact that he will be a farmer after his banishment from the Gar- separated from God, the one who was similar den of Eden. It is doubtful, though, that Cain to him. learned how to farm under Adam’s instruc- Never in the Bible does God request tion, since Adam is not mentioned by name Cain and Abel make a sacrifice to Him. The text clearly explains that Cain brought his of- ter the birth of his son, Cain builds the first city fering to God first, sacrificing fruits of his har- and names it Enoch, after his firstborn. The act vest. Abel only makes an offering after Cain of single-handedly building a city would be a makes his (Breitbart 122), and he offers to God huge accomplishment for a man of any era. the firstborns of his flock. By some sign God -re To build a city when there were no previous veals that he prefers the sacrifice presented blueprints or ideas to be worked from makes to him by Abel over the sacrifice presented by Cain’s act even more amazing. By giving Cain. The Bible never gives any indication as Cain credit for the creation of the first city, the to why Abel’s sacrifice was preferred, though Bible also makes Cain the possible creator of the scholar Julian Morgenstern argues that roads, public buildings, city walls and fortifica- Abel’s sacrifice is rewarded by God because tions, and water works. Of course, this would his job would have been more favorable to be a large number of things for a single man the nomadic, herding Israelites who told the to create, but nothing can be discredited, as story (61). However, since the Bible itself fails the Bible gives no description of Enoch. to present a reason to God’s choice, it means Through his son Enoch, Cain creates a that the reason why one sacrifice was pre- line that bears creators of many different forms ferred over the other was not as important as of livelihoods and arts (Litke 197). In the blood another message in this portion of the story. line of Cain there is Jabal, who was “… the It is considered more important to know who ancestor of those who live in tents and have sacrificed first than who gave the better sac- livestock” (Genesis 4:20). This makes Jabal the rifice, as the order of sacrifice is given in the creator of nomadic herders and the methods Bible. It was Cain who gave the first sacrifice that are used in herding. Jabal’s brother was without God’s prompting. Thus, Cain created named Jubal and he became “… the ances- the concept of making sacrifices to God. His tor of all those who play the lyre and pipe” sacrifice may not have been as good as his (Genesis 4:21). This makes Jabal creator of a brother’s, but without Cain there may never line that created music, instruments, and mu- have been the concept of religious sacrifice. sicians. Jabal and Jubal have a half-brother This would also explain the severity of Cain’s called Tubalcain, who “… made all kinds of anger after Abel’s sacrifice is rewarded by bronze and iron tools” (Genesis 4:22). This God. Cain’s jealousy would have been fu- makes Tubalcain the creator of the art of met- eled by anger that his brother gained a com- allurgy. Tubalcain can be used as the link be- pliment from God for doing something that he tween Cain and the closely named tribe of had created. Kenites, who were a group of wandering met- After banishment to the land east of al smiths in the ancient near East (Hess 807). Eden, Cain continues to create. He eventually Names in the Bible often have signifi- comes to the land of Nod and finds a woman cance, and Cain’s name is no exception. In who becomes his wife. She bears him a son, Hebrew the name can be interpreted to mean whom he names Enoch. Since Cain’s wife is “spear” (Von Rad 99). This name links him never named, the focus is on Cain when it once again to the wandering tribe of smiths, comes to the idea of creating this child. Af- the Kenites (Hess 807). Those two names also Schemata | Spring 2010 sound similar if the vowels that were given to but instead of implementing the “eye for an them in modern time are removed as they eye” concept familiar to later parts of the Old would have been in ancient Hebrew. Spears Testament, God makes the land unyielding to create as well. As weapons, spears lead to any of Cain’s attempts of cultivation. the creation of warfare. Warfare creates new- The most important thing that Cain cre- er and more advanced weapons. With newly ated was created unintentionally. After his created weapons, new forms of warfare are brother’s murder, God comes to Cain and created. To counteract this, even newer and asks where Abel is. Cain responds with the more advanced weaponry is created. This cy- now legendary line, “I do not know, am I my cle of lethal creation has continued into our brother’s keeper?” (Genesis 4:9). God does modern world. Though it is an abstract inter- not give this question a direct answer, but pretation, it is one that cannot be dismissed. responds with a much more emotional an- Lines in Genesis 4 seem to contradict swer by crying out that Abel’s innocent blood the underlying message of Cain being a cre- called out to him from the ground of the field. ator. After all, the plot revolves around the fact Such an answer reveals that Cain was much that Cain killed his brother. The Bible leaves no more than the keeper of his brother. He had doubt to this, as it clearly states, “And when been the keeper of another human being. He they were in the field, Cain rose up against would have been Abel’s keeper even if they his brother Abel, and killed him” (Genesis 4:8). had not been related. He was supposed to There is no ambiguity in the statement; the two feel joy for the other’s triumphs, sadness for the brothers had gone out into the field and Cain other’s defeats. He was expected to protect killed Abel. To kill is to destroy, and destruction his fellow man from danger. He had not been is the complete opposite of creation. What expected to do all of this because Abel was this argument does not address is that prior to his brother; rather, he was expected to do all Abel’s death there had been no murder. Out of this because Abel was another human be- in the field, Cain committed the first murder ing. Hicks’ theory that Abel represents all hu- (Wiesel 21). In this action Cain created not just man beings (4) solidifies the idea that each murder, but fratricide (Sarna 340). person is a keeper for mankind. Another seeming contradiction to the God does not answer Cain’s question message that Cain is a creator is that the land directly because of the complexity of the duty will no longer bear fruit for him after his broth- being presented. To directly confirm that Cain er’s death, as Abel’s blood soils the land. Due was his brother’s keeper would be permitting to this, God condemns Cain to the life of a cruelty between those who were not relat- drifter. But, if it were not for his time as a wan- ed by blood. By decrying the deed that has derer, Cain would never had built Enoch, the been done instead of answering Cain’s ques- first city, nor would he have met his wife, who tion, God reveals that Cain had never been bore him his son similarly named Enoch, whose the keeper of his brother, but he had been line created the crafts of the musicians, metal put in the position of a keeper of a human be- smiths, and nomadic herders (Litke 197).
Recommended publications
  • Eve's Answer to the Serpent: an Alternative Paradigm for Sin and Some Implications in Theology
    Calvin Theological Journal 33 (1998) : 399-420 Copyright © 1980 by Calvin Theological Seminary. Cited with permission. Scholia et Homiletica Eve's Answer to the Serpent: An Alternative Paradigm for Sin and Some Implications in Theology P. Wayne Townsend The woman said to the serpent, "We may eat fruit from the trees in the garden, but God did say, `You must not eat fruit from the tree that is in the middle of the garden, and you must not touch it, or you will die. "' (Gen. 3:2-3) Can we take these italicized words seriously, or must we dismiss them as the hasty additions of Eve's overactive imagination? Did God say or mean this when he instructed Adam in Genesis 2:16-17? I suggest that, not only did Eve speak accu- rately and insightfully in responding to the serpent but that her words hold a key to reevaluating the doctrine of original sin and especially the puzzles of alien guilt and the imputation of sin. In this article, I seek to reignite discussion on these top- ics by suggesting an alternative paradigm for discussing the doctrine of original sin and by applying that paradigm in a preliminary manner to various themes in the- ology, biblical interpretation, and Christian living. I seek not so much to answer questions as to evoke new ones that will jar us into a more productive path of the- ological explanation. I suggest that Eve's words indicate that the Bible structures the ideas that we recognize as original sin around the concept of uncleanness.
    [Show full text]
  • 05Jun 1999.Pdf
    N V Doors DOiiic re than one sad tale has been told of too little suddenly that his door of opportunity was closed. and too late." Recall Jesus' story of the Ten Virgins Said his master. "Take from him the pound, and give it who were awaiting the Imminent return of the bride to him that hat/i ten pounds" Luke 19:24. groom. Five of them were wise and well prepared for The book of James tells the same truth in these his arrival, even if it should be unexpectedly delayed. stark words; "To him that knoweth to do good, and loeth And five were not wise, and not prepared. Jesus it not, to hun it is sin' James 4:1 7. called these latter ones "foolish.' We quite naturally think that something we do What made the difference? All had brightly burn wrong is more serious than something we simply do ing lamps until.,.the time delayed, and the lamps of not do. But James tells us this is not true. He says that five of them were burning low, Getting more oil not to do what we know we should is equally as wrong became urgent. And while these five went to find oil as openly committed sin. In other words, sins of for their lamps-the bridegroom came. `4nd they that omission are ust as culpable as sins of commission. were ready went in with him to the ,narriage: and the door Neglect is serious. It is the warning of the book of was shut." Hebrews: "How shall we escap if we neglect so great sat The open door dosed.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Were the Kenites? OTE 24/2 (2011): 414-430
    414 Mondriaan: Who were the Kenites? OTE 24/2 (2011): 414-430 Who were the Kenites? MARLENE E. MONDRIAAN (U NIVERSITY OF PRETORIA ) ABSTRACT This article examines the Kenite tribe, particularly considering their importance as suggested by the Kenite hypothesis. According to this hypothesis, the Kenites, and the Midianites, were the peoples who introduced Moses to the cult of Yahwism, before he was confronted by Yahweh from the burning bush. Scholars have identified the Cain narrative of Gen 4 as the possible aetiological legend of the Kenites, and Cain as the eponymous ancestor of these people. The purpose of this research is to ascertain whether there is any substantiation for this allegation connecting the Kenites to Cain, as well as con- templating the Kenites’ possible importance for the Yahwistic faith. Information in the Hebrew Bible concerning the Kenites is sparse. Traits associated with the Kenites, and their lifestyle, could be linked to descendants of Cain. The three sons of Lamech represent particular occupational groups, which are also connected to the Kenites. The nomadic Kenites seemingly roamed the regions south of Palestine. According to particular texts in the Hebrew Bible, Yahweh emanated from regions south of Palestine. It is, therefore, plausible that the Kenites were familiar with a form of Yahwism, a cult that could have been introduced by them to Moses, as suggested by the Kenite hypothesis. Their particular trade as metalworkers afforded them the opportunity to also introduce their faith in the northern regions of Palestine. This article analyses the etymology of the word “Kenite,” the ancestry of the Kenites, their lifestyle, and their religion.
    [Show full text]
  • The Generations of Adam
    The Generations of Adam hat is the purpose of Bible chronology? According to Philip Mauro, in Wonders of Bible Chronology, “its basis is the Bible itself; its plan is the genealogical or life line that Wstretches from the first Adam to the last Adam ... and its purpose is to bring those who follow its progress to revelations of vital truth pertaining to God’s mighty work of redemption.” Genesis 5 reveals the time span between Adam and the worldwide flood of Noah’s time. The following table summarizes this time line: Age at: Anno Hominis Adam created 0 Adam's birth of Seth (130) 130 Seth's birth of Enosh (105) 235 Enosh's birth of Kenan (90) 325 Kenan's birth of Mahalalel (70) 395 Mahalalel's birth of Jared (65) 460 Jared's birth of Enoch (162) 622 Enoch's birth of Methuselah (65) 687 Methuselah's birth of Lamech (187) 874 Lamech's birth of Noah (182) 1056 time of worldwide flood Noah's 1656 (600) Before we analyze Genesis 5 further, a few general points must be made. First, the Bible is the only reliable source book that gives history with an exact chronology for the first 4000 years of the human race. It has been about 6000 years since the creation of man. For the first 3/5ths of this period, there is no chronological information whatever except in the Bible. The histories of other peoples give an account of their beginning vaguely and in the context of myths and fables. In contrast, the Bible is a very accurate historical document.
    [Show full text]
  • God Made Eve and Ordained Marriage
    GGOODD MMAADDEE EEVVEE aanndd oorrddaaiinneedd mmaarrrriiaaggee Several thousand years have passed since Adam and Eve became man and wife, but God hasn’t changed what he first instructed mankind regarding marriage in the Bible. Did you know that God was the One who decided that man and woman should marry? In Genesis 2 we find part of the wedding service spoken in many wedding ceremonies today. Men and women and marriage and children are very important to God. Marriage is not just a good idea… it’s a “God Idea”! But some people don’t know or don’t believe what God says about marriage. They say that marriage is something to be tried out to see if it will work—depending upon how you feel about it. Many folks are even suggesting that the idea of marriage is outdated. But what does the Bible say about marriage? Let’s take a look and find out! God decided that Adam needed a wife to help him and to be his companion. Genesis 2:18 The LORD God said, “It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper suitable for him.” God decided that Adam should not live alone. - God was his Creator and knew what was best for him. - God didn’t ask Adam what he wanted or thought best. - God made the decision to make a wife for Adam. God loved Adam and wanted him to be complete. - God knew that Adam wouldn’t continue to be happy if he remained alone. - Because God loved Adam and wanted what was best for him, he decided to make a wife for him.
    [Show full text]
  • Another Look at Cain: from a Narrative Perspective
    신학논단 제102집 (2020. 12. 31): 241-263 https://doi.org/10.17301/tf.2020.12.102.241 Another Look at Cain: From a Narrative Perspective Wm. J McKinstry IV, MATS Adjunct Faculty, Department of General Education Presbyterian University and Theological Seminary In the Hebrew primeval histories names often carry significant weight. Much etymological rigour has been exercised in determining many of the names within the Bible. Some of the meaning of these names appear to have a consensus among scholars; among others there is less consensus and more contention. Numerous proposals have come forward with varying degrees of convincing (or unconvincing as the case may be) philological arguments, analysis of wordplays, possi- ble textual emendations, undiscovered etymologies from cognates in other languages, or onomastic studies detailing newly discovered names of similarity found in other ancient Semitic languages. Through these robust studies, when applicable, we can ascertain the meanings of names that may help to unveil certain themes or actions of a character within a narrative. For most of the names within the primeval histories of Genesis, the 242 신학논단 제102집(2020) meaning of a name is only one feature. For some names there is an en- compassing feature set: wordplay, character trait and/or character role, and foreshadowing. Three of the four members in the first family in Genesis, Adam, Eve, and Abel, have names that readily feature all the elements listed above. Cain, however, has rather been an exception in this area, further adding to Genesis 4’s enigmaticness in the Hebrew Bible’s primeval history. While three characters (Adam, Eve, and Abel) have names that (1) sound like other Hebrew words, that are (2) sug- gestive of their character or actions and (3) foreshadow or suggest fu- ture events about those characters, the meaning of Cain’s name does not render itself so explicitly to his character or his role in the narrative, at least not to the same degree of immediate conspicuousness.
    [Show full text]
  • The Christian Comforter
    The Christian Comforter Enoch the seventh from Adam In the book of Genesis, there are two Enoch’s; one from the line of Cain, in Genesis 4:17, and one from the line of Seth, who is the Enoch that we are concerned with here. The lineage is Adam — Seth — Enos — Cainan — Mahalaleel — Jared — Enoch. Enoch walked with God, and after 365 years God took him — he did not die. Genesis 5:23-24 And all the days of Enoch were three hundred sixty and five years: And Enoch walked with God: and he was not; for God took him. This fact is expanded upon in Hebrews chapter 11 — among those who walked in faith. Hebrews 11:5 By faith Enoch was translated that he should not see death; and was not found, because God had translated him: for before his translation he had this testimony, that he pleased God. Enoch is also found in the genealogy of Jesus. Luke 3:37 Which was the son of Mathusala, which was the son of Enoch, which was the son of Jared, which was the son of Maleleel, which was the son of Cainan. Note; above the names are spelt differently in the New Testament which was originally written in Greek. In the time of the early church fathers, the book of Enoch was widely accepted as inspired scripture by Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Clement of Alexandria, Athenagoras, Tertullian, Origen and Lactantius. They all referenced Enoch in their own writings, probably because of Jude’s reference that it was a prophetic text. Jude 1:14-15 And Enoch also, the seventh from Adam, prophesied of these, saying, Behold, the Lord cometh with ten thousands of his saints, to execute judgment upon all, and to convince all that are ungodly among them of all their ungodly deeds which they have ungodly committed, and of all their hard speeches which ungodly sinners have spoken against him.
    [Show full text]
  • Cain and Abel – Sermon 8Th November 2015
    1 Cain and Abel – Sermon 8th November 2015 Reading: Genesis 4: 1 – 26 Cain and Abel Adam made love to his wife Eve, and she became pregnant and gave birth to Cain. She said, 2 “With the help of the LORD I have brought forth a man.” Later she gave birth to his brother Abel. Now Abel kept flocks, and Cain worked the soil. 3 In the course of time Cain brought some of 4 the fruits of the soil as an offering to the LORD. And Abel also brought an offering—fat portions from some of the firstborn of his flock. The LORD looked with favour on Abel and his offering, 5 but on Cain and his offering he did not look with favour. So Cain was very angry, and his face was downcast. 6 7 Then the LORD said to Cain, “Why are you angry? Why is your face downcast? If you do what is right, will you not be accepted? But if you do not do what is right, sin is crouching at your door; it desires to have you, but you must rule over it.” 8 Now Cain said to his brother Abel, “Let’s go out to the field.” While they were in the field, Cain attacked his brother Abel and killed him. 9 Then the LORD said to Cain, “Where is your brother Abel?” “I don’t know,” he replied. “Am I my brother’s keeper?” 10 The LORD said, “What have you done? Listen! Your brother’s blood cries out to me from the ground.
    [Show full text]
  • Adam and Eve—Community: Reading Genesis
    last day of creative work. In the second account, however, Man is created before anything else.2 Of course, it is not to be denied that the text did not spring up ex nihilo, created by a Volume 1, Issue 1 | Fall 2003 writer without reference to previous texts. The redactor undoubtedly had a number of Adam and Eve—Community: texts to which he could refer in creating the Reading Genesis 2-3 Genesis text, and he undoubtedly used works already familiar to him as sources. Or James E. Faulconer it is conceivable that there was no individual Brigham Young University redactor or set of redactors, but only the egin thinking about human community solidifying of an oral tradition. For our B and its possibility at the beginning, or purposes, it does not matter. In either case it almost at the beginning, one step after the is too much to assume that the final text is immemorial beginning.1 The biblical story merely contradictory. There may be of the creation of Man (’adam) and Woman contradictions within the text, but the more (’isha) and their expulsion from the garden obvious those contradictions are, the less places humans in the world in a particular likely it is that they are contradictions that way; it creates a habitation for human life so undo the text. It is too much to assume that that the history shared by humans and the the redaction of Genesis was a product of story that manifests community includes the blindness. A considerable amount of “cut possibility of gathering together all humans and paste” work was surely involved in the as unique individuals rather than simply as creation of the Genesis story, but unless we members of a collective.
    [Show full text]
  • BIBLICAL BEGINNINGS- “The Fall That Fractured Man” DATE: December 8, 2019 ​
    MESSAGE/SERIES: BIBLICAL BEGINNINGS- “The Fall that Fractured Man” DATE: December 8, 2019 ​ SCRIPTURE FOR THIS WEEK: (These verses will help you understand themes within as you read our core text as scripture proves scripture) Genesis 3-5, Romans 5:12, 2 Corinthians 11:3, Hebrews 11:3-5, Revelations 12:9, 1 ​ John 3:12, John 8:44, 1 John 2:16, Matthew 4:3-8, 1 Timothy 2:14, Galatians 3:16, Romans 8:19-23 (Nature affected by curse), 1 John 3:8-12 (The Sinner practices ​ sin/love propels obedience & repentance), Isaiah 53:3 OPENING SCRIPTURE: [Genesis 3-5] “Now the serpent was more crafty than any other beast of the field that the Lord God had made. He said to the woman, “Did God actually say, ‘You shall not eat of any tree in the garden’?” 2 And the woman said to the serpent, “We may eat of the fruit of the trees in the garden, 3 but God said, ‘You shall not eat of the fruit of the tree that is in the midst of the garden, neither shall you touch it, lest you die.’ ” 4 But the serpent said to the woman, “You will not surely die. 5 For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.” 6 So when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was a delight to the eyes, and that the tree was to be desired to make one wise, she took of its fruit and ate, and she also gave some to her husband who was with her, and he ate.
    [Show full text]
  • Adam, Eve, and the New and Everlasting Covenant
    Adam, Eve, and the New and Everlasting Covenant Jeffrey M. Bradshaw While the importance of account of the Creation and the Fall in Moses 1-4 cannot be overstated, a careful reading of Moses 5-8 is required to see the prior material in its overall context.1 Reeves observes: Most modern students of Bible fail to discern the pivotal significance which [the tale of Cain and Abel] plays in the present narrative structure of Genesis because of the enormous religious significance with which ancient, medieval, and modern Christian interpreters have invested the immediately preceding story of Adam and Eve in the Garden… I would like to suggest that while admittedly the episode of disobedience in the Garden was not a good thing, the story of Cain and Abel introduces something far worse into the created order… It represents a critical turning point in antediluvian history, and is… the key crime which leads ineluctably to the Flood.2 Foreseeing the similar rise of alluring wickedness in our own time, the Savior warned that “as it was in the days of Noah, so it shall be also at the coming of the Son of Man.”3 The illustration above is taken from Stephen Vincent Benét’s 1936 story The Devil and Daniel Webster, made into a popular film in 1941. Piazza characterizes the latter as “a fascinating allegory, filmed on the eve of World War II, of a society gone mad with materialism, a premonition of the opportunities and dangers awaiting the United States as it recovered from the Great Depression.”4 Old Scratch is portrayed as polite, refined, and soft-spoken—and as usual, he “gets the best lines” as he preaches his gospel of cold cash to a down-on-his-luck New Hampshire farmer.
    [Show full text]
  • Genesis 4:1-26! the Story of Cain and His Heinous Sin; Yet , God Remembered and Cared for Cain! the Book of Genesis Is One Big S
    Genesis 4:1-26! The story of Cain and his heinous sin; yet, God remembered and cared for Cain! The book of Genesis is one big story book! It was written by Moses in order to serve as an introduction toward helping his ancient readers and modern readers alike, understand and appreciate the call of God to Israel to be His special covenant people. It is a foundational book! By calling it a foundational book, I am asserting that this seemingly benign book of “nice stories” contains key ideas regarding God, God’s relationship to Israel as a people, and God’s purposes for Israel and humanity. This sometimes neglected chapter is not any different. It is not only conveys to the reader a wonderfully told story; but the complete story (main story plus supplements) offers key insights into God and how He relates to fallen sinners like Cain and to sinner s like you and me that needs to be heeded and not forgotten. Chapter 4 picks up the story regarding the devastating failure of the first pair of humanity. Recall, the first couple’s failure to listen to, trust the LORD, and obey Him in the garden. Recall, how chapter 3 concluded our epic tale to this point with the lingering impression that this first couple -Adam and Eve- have been kicked out of the garden. However, even though they have been kicked out of the garden, they are still in Eden. Furthermore, God has not abandoned them. They are still under his mandate to work the ground and fulfill the purposes for which God created them.
    [Show full text]