Open Dissertation Mjramirez 121819.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Open Dissertation Mjramirez 121819.Pdf The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School THE PERCEIVED LONG-TERM INFLUENCE OF YOUTH EXPEDITIONS ON PARTICIPANTS’ LIVES A Dissertation in Recreation, Park and Tourism Management by María José Ramírez Cañas © 2020 María José Ramírez Cañas Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2020 The dissertation of María José Ramírez Cañas, was reviewed and approved* by the following: Pete Allison Associate Professor of Recreation, Park, and Tourism Management Dissertation Advisor Chair of Committee Peter Newman Department Head/Professor of Recreation, Park, and Tourism Management B. Derrick Taff Assistant Professor of Recreation, Park, and Tourism Management Robert Roeser Bennett Pierce Professor of Care and Compassion Professor of Human Development and Family Studies *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School. ii ABSTRACT Despite the often-repeated rhetoric that youth expeditions are “life-changing” experiences, the evidence on their perceived long-term impact is scarce (Allison et al., 2018; Allison & Von Wald, 2013; Hattie, Marsh, Neill, & Richards, 1997). Researchers have also criticized what appears to be an disproportionate focus on outcomes, and the lack of a sound theoretical framework explaining how the benefits of adventure programs are achieved (Allison & Pomeroy, 2000; Allison & Von Wald, 2013; Brown, 2008; Ewert & McAvoy, 2000; McKenzie, 2003; Seaman, 2008; Shellman, 2011). Youth expedition organizations have a genuine need to conduct research, not only to provide empirical evidence to back up their claims that the lessons and skills acquired during youth expeditions are transferred into other life contexts, but also to inform their practices. There is little empirical evidence of the mechanisms explaining individuals’ change in outdoor adventure programs (e.g., Allison & Von Wald, 2013; Sibthorp, 2003), which is essential if youth organizations aim to facilitate development experiences that will have a lasting influence on participants' lives. The purpose of this research is to examine the perceived long-term influence of expeditions in participants lives approximately 30 or more years after the event, and the experiences that contributed to those influences. Context. British Exploring Society (BES) organizes 3-6 week-long land-based self- sufficient expeditions for non-intact groups (group of people who do not know each other) of young people between the ages of 16 and 25 years old. These expeditions combine science research projects in a variety of climates and remote locations with adventure (e.g., mountaineering, canoeing). BES expeditions can be considered a representative case in the iii youth expedition field, and through analytical generalization, the findings of this study are relevant to similar youth organizations (Yin, 2014). This study used a retrospective approach involving two phases. The first phase involved a web-based survey, followed by individual semi-structured interviews in the second phase. Phase 1: Instrumentation. Web-based survey. The purpose of the survey was twofold. First, it identified emerging themes regarding the influence of the expedition experience in explorers’ lives, and second, it identified potential interviewees for the second phase. The development of the survey was based on the analysis of the instruments developed by previous studies on expeditions and related topics in the last fifteen years (e.g., Asfeldt & Hvenegaard, 2013; Daniel, 2003; Gassner, 2006; Harper, Downie, Muir, & White, 2016; Takano, 2010). Data collection. The web-based survey was sent to all BES members in the BES database who had participated in an expedition five or more years before the data collection date. Data management. All the survey data was downloaded from Qualtrics and compiled in SPSS. All the identifiable information was removed from the working file and kept separately in a password protected document. Data analysis. Descriptive statistics and T-Tests were conducted to analyze the survey data and identify potential interviewees for the second phase. Phase 2: Instrumentation. The interview schedule was developed based on the analysis of previous studies and literature that addressed the retrospective influence that expeditions had iv on participants and the experiences that contributed to the influence (e.g., Asfeldt & Hvenegaard, 2013; Daniel, 2003; Gassner, 2006; Takano, 2010). Data collection. Twenty-six interviews were conducted with people who had gone on their first BES expedition 29 to 66 years ago. Seventeen of the twenty-six interviewees were male, reflecting the fact that women did not begin to participate in BES expeditions until 1980. Interviews lasted an average of one hour and were audio-recorded with participants’ consent. Data management. Interviews were transcribed and managed using the software MAXQDA. Identifiable information was not included in the transcripts. Data analysis. After a first inductive phase, where ideas emerged from interview data, useful for more unstructured and semi-structured interviews (Schulz, 2012), a deductive approach was incorporated in a second phase. Code definitions were developed during the coding process considering previous literature. The code definitions allowed consistent applications throughout the analyses (Miles et al., 2014). Intercoder agreement was calculated as well as member checking in order to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the findings. An intercoder agreement of 0.97 was achieved with two volunteer coders and the analysis was returned to 14 interview participants who expressed agreement with the findings. Results: The web-based survey was completed by 144 respondents (82 males, 62 females). The average age was 46 years (ranging from 21 to 87 years). The mean period of retrospection was 27 years (minimum of 6 and a maximum of 68 years). For the majority of respondents (93.8%), their first BES expedition experience was “enjoyable and meaningful”. Regarding the “life- changing” quality of the expedition, participants rated their agreement on a 9-point Likert scale v 1 (strongly disagree) through 9 (strongly agree) with the statement "My first BES expedition changed the course of my life". Seventy percent of respondents rated the statement at seven or higher, with 32.6% rating it nine. Interviewees perceived seven long-lasting influences: (1) All interviewees reported 'Connecting with others', (2) 96% reported 'Fulfilling potential' such as gaining confidence and resilience, (3) 96% of participants mentioned 'Development of leisure activities and outdoor knowledge/skills', (4) 92% reported 'Knowing thyself', (5) 92% of interviewees' shared the experience' to others, (6) 92% of participants identified an 'Impact on academic and professional life’, and (7) 65% 'Connected with nature and the world'. The expedition provided experiences in which participants felt autonomous (the desire to feel that one is the initiator of one's behaviors and to experience a sense of choice) competent (the desire to feel capable when facing challenges) and related to others (the inclination to feel connected to others). Participants also identified contact with nature as a significant component contributing to their development referring to the beauty and the sense of 'awe' generated by the natural landscape and the surroundings as well as an appreciation of natural processes such as the seasons and animals seen during the expedition. Experiences facilitating relatedness and autonomy were reported by 96% of participants, while experiences supporting competence were mentioned by 92%. Fifty eight percent of interviewees discussed the importance of contact with nature. The expedition provided a variety of experiences that fostered participants to feel related to others, autonomous, competent and in contact with nature. For instance, by engaging in social situations and interacting with diverse others, interviewees experienced relatedness. Being responsible for oneself and raising money vi promoted autonomy, and by overcoming the toughness of the environment and physical challenges, participants experienced a sense of competency. Lastly, contact with nature was experienced by observing the wildlife, the phenomena of the natural world, and experiencing a sense of awe. This study concludes by proposing a model that integrates the long-term influences of expeditions, the expedition affordances, and expedition experiences. The model proposes that, an expedition environment, where participants feel connected with others (relatedness), perceive they are the source of their actions (autonomy), and experience how to overcome challenges (competence) in a natural place (contact with nature), will promote a long-lasting positive influence on participants' lives. This research looked at the influence of outdoor adventure experiences over three decades after the experience, a length of retrospection not often seen in the outdoor adventure literature. This study provides evidence that the influence of expedition experiences can be long-lasting and significant in participants’ lives and offers a robust theoretical framework to understand the mechanisms leading to these influences by incorporating self- determination theory (SDT) (Ryan & Deci, 2017). SDT suggests that environments that promote the fulfillment of the three basic psychological needs of autonomy, competence, and relatedness, promote optimal functioning across life domains, explaining how and why expedition experiences can have a positive
Recommended publications
  • Human Spaceflight in Social Media: Promoting Space Exploration Through Twitter
    Human Spaceflight in Social Media: Promoting Space Exploration Through Twitter Pierre J. Bertrand,1 Savannah L. Niles,2 and Dava J. Newman1,3 turn back now would be to deny our history, our capabilities,’’ said James Michener.1 The aerospace industry has successfully 1 Man-Vehicle Laboratory, Department of Aeronautics and Astro- commercialized Earth applications for space technologies, but nautics; 2Media Lab, Department of Media Arts and Sciences; and 3 human space exploration seems to lack support from both fi- Department of Engineering Systems, Massachusetts Institute of nancial and human public interest perspectives. Space agencies Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts. no longer enjoy the political support and public enthusiasm that historically drove the human spaceflight programs. If one uses ABSTRACT constant year dollars, the $16B National Aeronautics and While space-based technologies for Earth applications are flourish- Space Administration (NASA) budget dedicated for human ing, space exploration activities suffer from a lack of public aware- spaceflight in the Apollo era has fallen to $7.9B in 2014, of ness as well as decreasing budgets. However, space exploration which 41% is dedicated to operations covering the Internati- benefits are numerous and include significant science, technological onal Space Station (ISS), the Space Launch System (SLS) and development, socioeconomic benefits, education, and leadership Orion, and commercial crew programs.2 The European Space contributions. Recent robotic exploration missions have
    [Show full text]
  • Kazakhstan Blocks Russian Satellite Launches: Reports 28 May 2012
    Kazakhstan blocks Russian satellite launches: reports 28 May 2012 Kommersant. The launches that are set to be shelved or already postponed are the launch of European meterorological satellite MetOp-B that had been due May 23, the launch of Belarussian, Canadian, German and two Russian satellites on June 7 and the launch of Russian satellite Resurs-P in August. It is not clear how and when the seven satellites will now be launched. There is no suggestion however that the dispute Russian police officers guard the Soyuz TMA-22 rocket will affect manned launches from Baikonur which of the International Space Station (ISS) Expedition 30 also use a Soyuz rocket but whose debris usually during its transportation to a launch pad in the Russian- leased Kazakh Baikonur cosmodrome in 2011. falls in a different zone. Kazakhstan, which hosts Russia's Baikonur cosmodrome, is blocking three upcoming Russian Kommersant said one possible reason for the satellite launches because of a dispute over the drop dispute is Russia's building of a new cosmodrome zone for rocket debris. Vostochny in its own Far East territory which when completed will provide an alternative launch site to Baikonur. Kazakhstan, which hosts Russia's Baikonur It said Kazakhstan fears that the new cosmodrome cosmodrome, is blocking three upcoming Russian will encourage Russia to break the lease satellite launches because of a dispute over the agreement on Baikonur, which is due to last until drop zone for rocket debris, reports said on 2050 and sees Moscow pay Astana almost $115 Monday. million in rent annually. The first stages of the Soyuz rockets that were Baikonur was the historic Soviet cosmodrome from scheduled to launch a total of seven satellites were where Yuri Gagarin made the first manned space due to fall down over a region of north Kazakhstan flight in 1961.
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomy News
    Astronomy News Night Sky 2018 – June Sunrise Sunset Mercury Sets Venus Sets 1st – 5:02am 1st – 9:16pm 15th – 10:23pm 1st – 11:55pm 10th – 4:57am 10th – 9:24pm 20th – 10:41pm 10th – 11:55pm 20th – 4:56am 20th – 9:29pm 25th – 10:49pm 20th – 11:46pm 30th – 5:00am 30th – 9:29pm 30th – 10:48pm 30th – 11:32pm Moon Rise Moon Set Moon Rise Moon Set - - - - - - - 1st – 7:25am 16th – 7:57am 16th – 11:53pm 1st – 11:40pm 2nd – 8:16am 17th – 9:13am 18th – 12:31am 3rd – 12:20am 3rd – 9:13am 18th – 10:31am 19th – 1:03am 4th – 12:55am 4th – 10:13am 19th – 11:48am 20th – 1:29am (FQ) 5th – 1:24am 5th – 11:16am 20th – 1:04pm (FQ) 21st – 1:53am 6th – 1:50am (LQ) 6th – 12:22pm (LQ) 21st – 2:16pm 22nd – 2:16am 7th – 2:13am 7th – 1:29pm 22nd – 3:27pm 23rd – 2:39am 8th – 2:36am 8th – 2:38pm 23rd – 4:36pm 24th – 3:03am 9th – 2:58am 9th – 3:50pm 24th – 5:43pm 25th – 3:30am 10th – 3:22am 10th – 5:04pm 25th – 6:48pm 26th – 4:01am 11th – 3:48am 11th – 6:21pm 26th – 7:50pm 27th – 4:38am 12th – 4:20am 12th – 7:40pm 27th – 8:47pm 28th – 5:21am (Full) 13th – 4:59am (New) 13th – 8:56pm (New) 28th – 9:37pm (Full) 29th – 6:10am 14th – 5:47am 14th – 10:05pm 29th – 10:20pm 30th – 7:04am 15th – 6:47am 15th – 11:05pm 30th – 10:57pm - - - - - - - A useful site: www.heavens- above.com A S Zielonka On May 31st at midnight, Saturn will be just 1 degree below the Moon which is 7 degrees above the south east horizon.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA Undecided Due to Leak Investigation 24 January 2014, by Elizabeth Howell
    Will spacewalks happen on Expedition 40? NASA undecided due to leak investigation 24 January 2014, by Elizabeth Howell launches in late March. Joining the two-time shuttle astronaut will be two other people, including Alexander Skvortsov. The Russian cosmonaut commanded Expedition 24 in 2010, which experienced a similar ammonia leak to the one that was just repaired a few months ago. While leaks and spacewalks are the items that grab headlines when it comes to spaceflight, one of the major goals of the International Space Station is more subtle. Researchers hope to understand how spaceflight affects the human body during long- duration missions. (This will be a major focus of a one-year mission to station in 2015.) Through a translator, Skvortsov explained that the recent Steve Swanson, commander of Expedition 40, during a decision to extend station's operations to at least spacewalk on 2007 shuttle mission STS-117. Credit: 2024 will be a help for research of this kind. NASA Remember those snorkels and pads astronauts used during the ammonia pump replacement on station this past December? The new measures went a long way to helping astronauts stay safe if another helmet water leak happens, but at the same time, NASA is eager to find the cause so they know how it happened and how to prevent it. Two maintenance spacewalks are planned for Expedition 40, but they're not necessarily going forward yet. NASA has traced the issue to a fan pump separator, but there's another issue, explained expedition commander Steve Swanson: Expedition 39/40 cosmonaut Alexander Skvortsov during where the particulates in the water came from.
    [Show full text]
  • International Space Station Facilities Research in Space 2017 and Beyond Table of Contents
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration International Space Station Facilities Research in Space 2017 and Beyond Table of Contents Welcome to the International Space Station 1 Program Managers 2 Program Scientists 3 Research Goals of Many Nations 4 An Orbiting Laboratory Complex 5 Knowledge and Benefits for All Humankind 6 Highlights from International Space Station 7 Benefits for Humanity, 2nd Edition What is an ISS Facility? 9 ISS Research History and Status 10 ISS Topology 11 Multipurpose Laboratory Facilities 21 Internal Multipurpose Facilities 23 External Multipurpose Facilities 37 Biological Research 47 Human Physiology and Adaptation Research 65 Physical Science Research 73 Earth and Space Science Research 87 Technology Demonstration Research 95 The ISS Facility Brochure is published by the NASA ISS Program Science Office. Acronyms 100 Executive Editor: Joseph S. Neigut Associate Editor: Judy M. Tate-Brown Index 104 Designer: Cynthia L. Bush NP-2017-04-014-A-JSC Welcome to the International Space Station The International Space Station (ISS) is an unprecedented human achievement from conception to construction, to operation and long-term utilization of a research platform on the frontier of space. Fully assembled and continuously inhabited by all space agency partners, this orbiting laboratory provides a unique environment in which to conduct multidisciplinary research and technology development that drives space exploration, basic discovery and Earth benefits. The ISS is uniquely capable of unraveling the mysteries of our universe— from the evolution of our planet and life on Earth to technology advancements and understanding the effects of spaceflight on the human body. This outpost also serves to facilitate human exploration beyond low-Earth orbit to other destinations in our solar system through continued habitation and experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Da 03 09 2015.Pdf
    EXPEDITION 45 L'EQUIPAGE Scott J. KELLY (Commandant de bord) EXPEDITION 43/44/45/46 Départ: Soyuz TMA-16M le 27/03/2015 Retour: Soyuz TMA-18M le 02/03/2016 BIOGRAPHIE Etat civil: Né le 21/02/1964 à Orange (New Jersey). Marié et 2 enfants. Etudes: Bachelier en ingénierie (State University of New York Maritime College), Maîtrise en systèmes avioniques (University of Tennessee) NASA Sélection: Intégre le Groupe 16 le 01/05/1996 Précédents vols: STS-103 (07 jours 23:11 en décembre 1999) STS-118 (12 jours 17:56 en août 2007) Expedition 26 (159 jours 08:44 d'octobre 2010 à avril 2011) Mikhail B. KORNIYENKO (Ingénieur de vol) EXPEDITION 43/44/45/46 Départ: Soyuz TMA-16M le 27/03/2015 Retour: Soyuz TMA-18M le 02/03/2016 BIOGRAPHIE Etat civil: Né le 15/04/1960 à Syzran (Russie). Marié et 1 enfant. Etudes: Graduat en ingénierie (Moscow Aviation Institute) ROSKOSMOS Sélection: Intégre le RKKE-14 le 24/02/1998 Précédents vols: Expedition 23/24 (176 jours 01:19 d'avril à septembre 2010) L'EQUIPAGE Oleg D. KONONENKO (Ingénieur de vol) EXPEDITION 44/45 Départ: Soyuz TMA-17M le 22/07/2015 Retour: Soyuz TMA-17M le 22/12/2015 BIOGRAPHIE Etat civil: Né le 21/06/1964 à Chardzhou (Turkmenistan). Marié, 2 enfants. Etudes: Graduat en ingénierie mécanique (Kharkov Aviation Institute), Graduat en ingénierie mécanique (Kuibyshev Aviation Institute) ROSKOSMOS Sélection: Intégre le TsPK-12 le 29/03/1996 Précédents vols: Expedition 17 (198 jours 16:20 d'avril à octobre 2008) Expedition 30/31 (192 jours 18:58 de novembre 2011 à juillet 2012) Kimiya Yui (Ingénieur de vol) EXPEDITION 44/45 Départ: Soyuz TMA-17M le 22/07/2015 Retour: Soyuz TMA-17M le 22/12/2015 BIOGRAPHIE Etat civil: Né le 30/01/1970 à Nagano (Japon).
    [Show full text]
  • International Space Station Benefits for Humanity, 3Rd Edition
    International Space Station Benefits for Humanity 3RD Edition This book was developed collaboratively by the members of the International Space Station (ISS) Program Science Forum (PSF), which includes the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Canadian Space Agency (CSA), European Space Agency (ESA), Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), State Space Corporation ROSCOSMOS (ROSCOSMOS), and the Italian Space Agency (ASI). NP-2018-06-013-JSC i Acknowledgments A Product of the International Space Station Program Science Forum National Aeronautics and Space Administration: Executive Editors: Julie Robinson, Kirt Costello, Pete Hasbrook, Julie Robinson David Brady, Tara Ruttley, Bryan Dansberry, Kirt Costello William Stefanov, Shoyeb ‘Sunny’ Panjwani, Managing Editor: Alex Macdonald, Michael Read, Ousmane Diallo, David Brady Tracy Thumm, Jenny Howard, Melissa Gaskill, Judy Tate-Brown Section Editors: Tara Ruttley Canadian Space Agency: Bryan Dansberry Luchino Cohen, Isabelle Marcil, Sara Millington-Veloza, William Stefanov David Haight, Louise Beauchamp Tracy Parr-Thumm European Space Agency: Michael Read Andreas Schoen, Jennifer Ngo-Anh, Jon Weems, Cover Designer: Eric Istasse, Jason Hatton, Stefaan De Mey Erik Lopez Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency: Technical Editor: Masaki Shirakawa, Kazuo Umezawa, Sakiko Kamesaki, Susan Breeden Sayaka Umemura, Yoko Kitami Graphic Designer: State Space Corporation ROSCOSMOS: Cynthia Bush Georgy Karabadzhak, Vasily Savinkov, Elena Lavrenko, Igor Sorokin, Natalya Zhukova, Natalia Biryukova,
    [Show full text]
  • 2Nd Annual ISS Research and Development Conference
    2nd Annual ISS Research and Development Conference Discoveries, Applications and Opportunities July 16-18, 2013 Denver Marriott City Center 1701 California Street Denver, Colorado 80202 www.iss -casis.org www.astronautical.org 2nd Annual ISS Research and Development Conference July 16-18, 2013 Denver Marriott City Center, 1701 California Street, Denver, Colorado 80202 Organized by the American Astronautical Society in cooperation with the Center for the Advancement of Science in Space (CASIS) and NASA Sponsored by: Gold Sponsor Luncheon Sponsor Media Sponsor The International Space Station (ISS) – Scientific Laboratory Technology Testbed Orbiting Outpost Galactic Observatory Innovation Engine Student Inspiration. This conference focuses on ISS Research and Development — Discoveries in Microgravity Science; Discoveries in Space Science, Earth Science, Engineering and Education; Applications Benefitting Earth; Applications Enabling Exploration; and Opportunities. Plenary sessions will highlight major results and pathways to future opportunities. Organizations managing and funding research on ISS, including the ISS National Laboratory and NASA programs, will provide overviews of upcoming opportunities. Parallel technical sessions will provide tracks for scientists to be updated on significant accomplishments to date within their disciplines. A workshop on July 18 will help new users take this information and develop their own ideas for experiments using this unique laboratory. Potential ISS users who attend will learn: “What can I do on the ISS? How can I do it?” This is the only annual gathering offering perspectives on the full breadth of research and technology development on the ISS – one stop for understanding the full suite of opportunities available now. Page 2 Conference Technical Co-Chairs Dr. David B.
    [Show full text]
  • SEEC-2016-General-Information.Pdf
    Tranquility Foundation, in partnership with Tranquility Masonic Lodge and in keeping with Freemasonry’s historic support of public education, proudly sponsors teachers attending this year’s Space Exploration Educators Conference. Thanks to each of you for teaching the next generation of space SEEC is a unique opportunity for educators from around the Globe to meet up and find out what is happening in the Space Program and how they can share the excitement of space with their students. After attending the 22nd Annual Space Exploration Educators Conference you will go home recharged and ready to ignite the minds of your students! Network with the top scientists, engineers and educators from the United States, Canada, and Japan. Hear Keynotes by leaders in the space program. Collect exciting materials to inspire your students and enhance your classroom. Hear from astronauts and engineers currently working on space exploration. Earn up to 24 Professional Development hours. Wednesday, Feb. 3, 2016 3-6 p.m. Early bird check-in Tour our new Independence Plaza Exhibit, brought to you by Boeing Thursday, Feb. 4, 2016 7:15 a.m. Check-in begins 7:45 a.m. SEEC 101 (A must for all new attendees to SEEC) in Blast-Off! Theater 8:30 a.m. Welcome address and keynote (Space Center Theater)– John Horack 10:15-11:30 a.m. First session (60 min) 11:30 a.m.-12:30 p.m. Lunch buffet in Astronaut Gallery Book signing- Astronaut Clay Anderson (Space trader gift shop) 12:45-2:15 p.m. Second session (90 min) 2:45-4:15 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Requirements, Resource Planning and Management for Decrewing/Recrewing Scenarios of the International Space Station
    Requirements, Resource Planning and Management for Decrewing/Recrewing Scenarios of the International Space Station David A. Bach [email protected] Barrios Technology, Inc. NASA – Johnson Space Center TOPICS COVERED • August 2011 Decrewing Background and History • Increment Support • Priority Integration • Recommendations and Lessons Learned 2 BACKGROUND • On August 24, 2011, the propulsion unit of the Soyuz-U rocket carrying 44 Progress (44P) failed. The rocket and cargo was lost. • The failure occurred, five months into the six month Expedition 27/28 Mission. • No crew or ground Expedition 28 Crew personnel were injured. 3 WHAT HAPPENED • Subsequent Russian launches using the Soyuz rocket (-U and -FG series) were suspended pending analysis and Russian Commission results. • The two Soyuz vehicles docked to ISS for the Expedition 28 crew were unaffected by the failure of 44P. Launch of 43P - June 21, 2011 4 5 PLANNED & EXECUTED FLIGHT PROGRAMS Baselined Flight Program / Port Utilization Plan As Flown Post-44P Incident Flight Program / Port Utilization Plan 6 DECREW ASSESSMENT TEAMS • Joint Operations Panel established with Splinter teams to assess decrewing, sustained uncrewed operations, and subsequent recrewing of the ISS • Splinters were chaired by various ISSP teams 26S departs the ISS on September 16, 2011. Expedition 29 begins with only 3 crew members onboard for 61 days (four times longer than originally planned). 7 ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES • Existing ISS Program and Flight Rule documentation was used by the Splinters in developing crew and ground actions. Fossum works with Robonaut 2 in the Destiny laboratory . Fossum and Furukawa performed checkout and operations with R2. 8 VEHICLE MANIFEST & CONSUMABLES SPLINTER • ISSP Representatives chaired the Vehicle Manifest and Consumables splinter.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL HIGHLIGHTS of RESULTS from the INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION October 1, 2018 – October 1, 2019
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration ANNUAL HIGHLIGHTS of RESULTS from the INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION October 1, 2018 – October 1, 2019 Roll-out Solar Array ANNUAL HIGHLIGHTS of RESULTS from the INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION October 1, 2018 – October 1, 2019 Product of the International Space Station Program Science Forum This report was developed collaboratively by the members of the Canadian Space Agency (CSA), European Space Agency (ESA), Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), and the State Space Corporation ROSCOSMOS (ROSCOSMOS). The highlights and citations in this report, as well as all the International Space Station (ISS) results and citations collected to date, can be found at https://www.nasa.gov/stationresults. Managing Editors Ousmane Diallo, NASA Judy Tate-Brown, Barrios Technologies Executive Editor Kirt Costello, NASA Cover: Image of the Space Station Remote Manipulator System (SSRMS) with the Roll-Out Solar Array (ROSA) attached and the Earth in the background (ISS052E086056). NP-2019-11-010-JSC Table of Contents Introduction ......................................................................................... 1 Publication Highlights: Biology and Biotechnology ................................................................. 6 Publication Highlights: Human Research ............................................................................... 12 Publication Highlights: Physical Sciences ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Daniel C. Burbank (Captain, U.S
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas 77058 July 2018 Daniel C. Burbank (Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Ret.) NASA Astronaut Summary: Daniel C. Burbank was selected by NASA as an astronaut in April 1996. The Connecticut native has served as Mission Specialist on Space Shuttle missions STS-106 and STS-115, Flight Engineer on Expedition 29 and Commander of Expedition 30. For STS-106, Burbank and his crewmates prepared the International Space Station for the arrival of the first permanent expedition crew, delivering more than three tons of supplies and installing batteries, power converters, oxygen generation equipment and a treadmill on the station. For STS-115, the crew delivered and installed the P3/P4 truss and solar arrays that provide about one fourth of the station’s electrical power. During the 163 days aboard the station for Expedition 29/30, Burbank and his crew conducted science and technology development experiments and completed dozens of repairs and enhancements to the station’s systems. During his career, Burbank logged a total of 188 days in space and 7 hours and 11 minutes of spacewalk time. Burbank retired from NASA June 2018. Personal Data: Born July 27, 1961, in Manchester, Connecticut, but considers Yarmouth Port, Massachusetts, to be his home. Married, with two children. Enjoys running, skiing, hiking, sailing, amateur astronomy and playing guitar. His parents, Dan and Joan Burbank, reside in Tolland, Connecticut. Education: Graduated from Tolland High School, Tolland, Connecticut, in 1979. Received a Bachelor of Science degree in Electrical Engineering from the U.S.
    [Show full text]