Memoirs of a Radical Lawyer Free Ebook

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Memoirs of a Radical Lawyer Free Ebook FREEMEMOIRS OF A RADICAL LAWYER EBOOK Michael Mansfield | 512 pages | 08 Nov 2011 | Bloomsbury Publishing PLC | 9781408801291 | English | London, United Kingdom The Memoirs of a Radical Lawyer, By Michael Mansfield | The Independent This website uses cookies to help us give you the best experience when you visit our website. By continuing to use this website, you consent to our use of these cookies. Memoirs of a Radical Lawyerthe American lawyer, Clarence Darrow, achieved notoriety for his successful defence of the teenage thrill-killers, Nathan Leopold and Richard Loeb. His argument against imposing the death penalty on the basis of insanity secured Darrow's reputation as "the Great Defender". Setting out his motivation in22 years before the trial, Darrow stated that "liberty is the most jealous and exacting mistress that can beguile the brain and soul of man". The unorthodox career of civil rights barrister Michael Mansfield has undoubtedly been influenced by a similar dedication to the cause of liberty. Both men are characterised by the same spirited fascination with defending the Memoirs of a Radical Lawyer indefensible, and conducting trials where the press and public have pre-determined the guilt of the accused. Now Mansfield has chosen to put an end to his criminal defence practice after 42 years as a persistent thorn in the side of the Establishment. The publication Memoirs of a Radical Lawyer his memoirs presents his final closing speech before the court of public opinion. It provides a fascinating insight into the mind of a man who has devoted his life to securing the liberty of others. Born just two years after the death Memoirs of a Radical Lawyer Darrow, Mansfield grew up in Finchley, in domestic circumstances which gave little indication of his eventual anti-Establishment stance. An incident in which his mother was wrongly accused of a minor parking offence Memoirs of a Radical Lawyer credited by Mansfield as the start of a deeply-held distrust of authority. At eighteen he went to study philosophy at Keele under the empiricist Professor Antony Flew, who imbued in Mansfield a sense of both the importance and Memoirs of a Radical Lawyer of scientific method. Mansfield was called to the Bar inwhere, despite Memoirs of a Radical Lawyer initial training in a prosecution-orientated chambers, he quickly established himself as a passionate and effective defence advocate. In many respects, the purpose of a trial is to freeze a moment in time, in order to conduct a postmortem in the clinical setting of a courtroom. Events can be taken apart Memoirs of a Radical Lawyer analysed for emotion and motivation. It can then be at least partially reconstructed with the help of eyewitnesses and the tools of forensic science. Mansfield sets out his approach, always focusing on the weakest link in the chain of the prosecution's argument, whether it be forcibly extracted confessions, or unreliable scientific evidence. These memoirs benefit from a career spent at the heart of some of the most controversial criminal cases of the past Memoirs of a Radical Lawyer decades, including those of Barry George, the Birmingham Six, the "Ricin" trial and the posthumous appeal of Ruth Ellis, the last woman to be hanged in the UK. Mansfield has also undertaken a large number of high-profile inquiries, from Bloody Sunday to the inquest into the death of Jean Charles de Menezes. It is in the transcripts of his cross-examinations where the book really comes alive. John Memoirs of a Radical Lawyer once recalled his father's advice that "the art of cross-examination is not the art of examining crossly". Similarly, Mansfield's handling of witnesses shows a deftness and lightness of touch, combined with an unrelenting grasp of the underlying details. His style is reminiscent of Darrow's approach during his great cross-examination of the evangelist preacher-turned prosecutor, William Jennings Bryan, during the "Scopes Monkey Trial", which was credited with the premature demise of Bryan shortly after the trial. During the long months of the Bloody Sunday Inquiry, it was Mansfield's patient questioning of "Soldier F" which uncovered his vital admission of having shot the unarmed Barney McGuigan. He became so notorious for his dissection of witnesses, that "being Mansfielded" entered the police lexicon for those who were subjected to the ordeal. Mansfield has always prided himself on taking a different approach to his involvement in cases. Whilst his fellow barristers stuck to the prevailing orthodoxy of detached involvement with those they represent, Mansfield invests himself personally in each case. Although this imbues his reminiscences with an undeniable emotional intensity, it does lead to the occasional lapse of perspective. In particular, the re-telling of his work for Mohamed al Fayed during the Diana inquest betrays a streak of paranoia. In an interview with the Guardian inhe said "this cannot be an accident. Mansfield goes on to reveal in the book that "I found it difficult simply to accept that what happened in the Alma Tunnel in Para was 'just one of those tragic things'. Of course it might well have been, but that's what 'they' Memoirs of a Radical Lawyer hope we will think". At the outcome of the inquest, the coroner Lord Justice Scott Baker, noted acidly that parts of Fayed's case had been "demonstrably without foundation". Despite these difficulties, Memoirs of a Radical Lawyer is, on the whole, tightly written, and, despite its length, manages to distil his cases down to their central issues with a minimum of jargon, making it an enjoyable read. At the climax of his first defence speech in 80 BC, Cicero questioned the public interest surrounding the trial: "Perhaps it is the fact that my client is being properly defended that makes you feel so outraged. Sign up. You are browsing in private mode. Thom Dyke is a pupil barrister at Hardwicke Building. Memoirs of a Radical Lawyer Ga direct naar de inhoudhet zoekveld of het hoofdmenu. E-book voor. Unafraid of rejection or failure, Michael has taken on the most difficult and challenging cases of our times and despite the odds, won plenty. In Memoirs of Memoirs of a Radical Lawyer Radical Lawyer Michael dissects many of them, revealing his motivations, meticulous approach to forensic science, cross examination techniques, the political Memoirs of a Radical Lawyer and emotional reactions with clarity, subtlety and charm. Interspersed with personal anecdotes and recollections, this insightful book is liberally laced with Michael's quirky brand of anarchic humour. Issues of public concern, human rights and innovative attempts to construct a democratic legal system are discussed in full, but Memoirs of a Radical Lawyer also unveils with honesty and wit a man who has put as much passion and energy into his life as his work, one of the great personalities of our time. Boeken lenen: hoe werkt het? Zoeken in de catalogus Zoeken binnen de site. Michael Mansfield Memoirs of a radical lawyer E-book voor. Je kunt dit boek lenen als je lid bent van de Bibliotheek. Inloggen Boeken lenen: Memoirs of a Radical Lawyer werkt het? Klantenservice Vragen of hulp nodig? Lid worden Contact. Memoirs of a Radical Lawyer by Michael Mansfield | Book review | Law | The Guardian It has been suggested that he has rather enjoyed basking in the limelight all these years. A sort of Michael Moore figure of the legal circuit, filled with his own hubris, who occasionally moonlights on the 6 O'Clock News as the great public defender of the age. Anyone you care to mention who has had a grievance against the state or big business, or who has appealed successfully against a conviction — the Birmingham Six, Barry George acquitted on appeal of the murder of Jill Dandothe families of the Marchioness disaster, the family of Stephen Lawrence, Arthur Scargill, and most recently Mohammed Fayed, at the inquest into the deaths of Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed — have been Memoirs of a Radical Lawyer by Michael Mansfield. But to Mansfield's credit, there's not much vanity or swagger in this exhaustively chronicled memoir of a year career at the Bar. It is rather the burning desire to overturn injustice, a love of the underdog, and reassuringly, a love of the law, not his remarkable career, that is most striking. His reputation could easily have been shredded inwhen Mansfield agreed to represent the Price sisters. None of his colleagues wanted to take the case. Even his mother believed it "unthinkable" that he was representing Irish terrorists. Since then he has built a matchless reputation for taking the establishment to task, and asking uncomfortable questions about how the authorities run things. Mansfield's radicalism emanates principally from being a bleeding-heart liberal, but he also has a singular approach to practising law. That is what I was told when I started, and that is what I have always tried to ignore. Although emotional responses can be very difficult to handle, I believe that to deny them in your working life is as ridiculous as denying them in your personal one. He keeps a photo of Angela Cannings the woman who was given a life sentence for shaking her two children to deathand her newborn son in his wigs box. Mansfield was able to overturn the conviction by convincing the Court of Appeal that the evidence of the paediatrician Sir Roy Meadow was unreliable. It is these personal reminiscences that propel the book. In fact, it is difficult to think of anyone else outside government whose career has coincided with so many high-profile incidents and milestones. Mansfield thinks it highly plausible that Jill Dando was murdered in revenge for the Nato bombing of Belgrade inwhich Memoirs of a Radical Lawyer a Serbian TV personality.
Recommended publications
  • 12 Page Template
    Miscarriages of JusticeUK (MOJUK) 22 Berners St, Birmingham B19 2DR was sentenced to 6 years imprisonment and having served the equivalent term was released. Tele: 0121- 507 0844 Email: [email protected] Web: www.mojuk.org.uk He did not attempt to appeal against his conviction. 3. In August 2009 Charlton made an application to the Criminal Cases Review Commission MOJUK: Newsletter ‘Inside Out’ No 575 (24/03/2016) - Cost £1 ("CCRC"). It decided to investigate and concluded there were grounds to refer his conviction to this court. They then invited and received an application from Ali. They concluded that exceptional cir - IPCC Refers Leon Briggs Investigation to Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) cumstances existed justifying referral of his plea of guilty, despite the absence of any previous The Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) has concluded its investigation attempt by Ali to appeal his manslaughter conviction. Accordingly, both appeal again against con - into the circumstances surrounding the death of Leon Briggs, and has referred the case to the viction upon references by the CCRC under s.9 Criminal Appeal Act 1995 on the basis that there is Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) for a decision on whether criminal charges should be a real possibility that the Court of Appeal will consider that the appellants' convictions are unsafe. brought against any individual. On 4 November 2013, Mr Briggs was detained by Bedfordshire 208. It is true that a plea of guilty does not deprive us of jurisdiction to examine the safe - Police in a street in Luton under Section 136 of the Mental Health Act and restrained, before ty of Ali's conviction of manslaughter.
    [Show full text]
  • Socialist Lawyer 53
    Lawyer SocialistMagazine of the Haldane Society of Socialist Lawyers I Number 53 G October 2009 £2.50 THE RIGHT TO SELF- DETERMINATION Plus: SIXTY HUMAN RIGHTS BLAIR PEACH: IT’S YEARS OF UNDER ATTACK: TAKEN THREE LEGAL AID PHILIPPINES & DECADES Have Has it a future? COLOMBIA we got the truth? Haldane Society ThursdayNovember,London 19th Annual General seeMeeting page 3 Haldane Society PO Box 57055 London EC1P 1AF Website: www.haldane.org Contents Number 53 October 2009 ISSN 09 54 3635 News & comment ................................................................................ 4 From Derbyshire to Hanoi, Haldane members have been busy... Legal aid: 60 years on..............................................................12 Laura Janes asks for the last to leave to turn out the lights The Haldane Society was founded in 1930. It provides a forum for the discussion and analysis of law and the legal system, both nationally and internationally, from a socialist perspective. It holds frequent public meetings and conducts educational programmes. The Haldane Society is independent of any political party. Membership comprises lawyers, academics, students and legal workers as well as trade union and labour movement affiliates. President: Michael Mansfield QC Vice Presidents: Kader Asmal, Louise Christian, Tess Gill, Helena Kennedy QC, Imran Khan, Kate Markus, Gareth Peirce, Michael Seifert, David Turner- Samuels, Professor Lord Wedderburn QC Chair: Liz Davies ([email protected]) Vice-Chairs: Kat Craig (katherinec@ christiankhan.co.uk) and
    [Show full text]
  • Memoirs of a Radical Lawyer Free
    FREE MEMOIRS OF A RADICAL LAWYER PDF Michael Mansfield | 512 pages | 08 Nov 2011 | Bloomsbury Publishing PLC | 9781408801291 | English | London, United Kingdom Memoirs of a Radical Lawyer by Michael Mansfield | Book review | Law | The Guardian A radical lawyer with an unparalleled commitment to his clients, driven by anger at injustice and hypocrisy, intelligent, handsome and dynamic, Michael Mansfield has been tearing down the citadels of arcane legal conventions for more than forty years. Unafraid of rejection or failure, Michael has taken on the most difficult and challenging cases of our times and despite the odds, won plenty. In Memoirs of a Radical LawyerMichael dissects many of them, revealing his motivations, meticulous approach to forensic science, cross examination techniques, the political dimensions and emotional reactions with clarity, subtlety and charm. Interspersed with personal anecdotes and recollections, this insightful book is liberally laced with Michael's quirky brand of anarchic humour. Issues of public concern, human rights and innovative attempts to construct a democratic legal system are discussed in full, but Memoirs of a Radical Lawyeralso unveils with honesty and wit a man who has put as much passion and energy into his life as his work, one of the great personalities of our time. This book offers a unique insight into the role of human rights lawyers in Chinese law and politics. In her extensive account, Memoirs of a Radical Lawyer Pils shows how these practitioners are important as legal advocates for victims of injustice and how bureaucratic systems of control operate to subdue and marginalise them. The book also discusses how human rights lawyers and the social forces they work for and with challenge the system.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Annex a ICC-02/05-03/09-292-Anxa 09-02-2012 2/35 FB T
    ICC-02/05-03/09-292-AnxA 09-02-2012 1/35 FB T Public Annex A ICC-02/05-03/09-292-AnxA 09-02-2012 2/35 FB T This Annex contains the letters and statement provided by the following individuals along with their curriculua vitae: Al Letter from Michael Mansfield QC, dated 14 January 2012 • Michael Mansfield QC, is a leading member of the English Bar and Head of Tooks Chambers. He has been involved in some of the major Civil liberties and human rights cases in England and Wales over the past thirty years. He has considerable experience in intemational criminal and human rights law. A2 Letter from Rt. Hon. Sir Desmond de Silva PC. QC, dated 25 January 2012 • Rt. Hon. Sir Desmond de Silva PC. QC, is the former Chief Prosecutor of the Special Court for Sierra Leone and currently a leading member of the English Bar. A3 Letter from Professor Michael Newton, dated 25 January 2012 • Professor Michael Newton, is the Professor of the Practice of Law at Vanderbilt University. Professor Newton specialises, inter alia, in the areas of international humanitarian law, intemational criminal law, and special tribunals. A4 Statement in Support from William J. Fenrick, dated 27 January 2012 • William J. Fenrick, was a member of the United Nations Commission of Experts whose Report (further to Security Council Resolution 780 (1992)) was a precursor to Security Council Resolution 827 (1993) and the establishment of the ICTY. Mr Fenwick is a former Senior Legal Adviser in the Office of the Prosecutor at the ICTY where he served under Prosecutors Goldstone, Arbour and Del Ponte from 1994-2004.
    [Show full text]
  • The Emergence of Cognitive Bias in Forensic Science and Sherry Nakhaeizadeh Criminal Investigations Itiel E Dror Ruth M Morgan
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF AMERICAN LEGAL STUDIES VOLUME 4 - ISSUE 2 - SPECIAL ISSUE Fall 2015 SPECIAL ISSUE Criminal Justice and Forensic Science Evidence: Current Controversies Contents FOREWORD ‘Off’Track’ Police Investigations, Case Construction and Marika L Henneberg Flawed Forensic Practices: An Analysis of Three Fatal Barry W Loveday Stabbings in Sweden, California and England The Emergence of Cognitive Bias in Forensic Science and Sherry Nakhaeizadeh Criminal Investigations Itiel E Dror Ruth M Morgan Admissibility Frameworks and Scientific Evidence: Marika L Henneberg Controversies in Relation to Shaken Baby Syndrome / Abusive Head Trauma Science Without Precedent: The Impact of the National Simon A Cole Research Council Report on the Admissibility and Use of Gary Edmond Forensic Science Evidence in the United States Forensic Evidence and the Court of Appeal for England Lissa Griffin and Wales Judicial Responses to Shifting Scientific Opinion in Forensic Sarah Lucy Cooper Identification Evidence and Newly Discovered Evidence Claims in the United States: The Influence of Finality and Legal Process Theory AFTERWORD In the Eye of the Beholder Michael Mansfield QC ISSN 2049-4092 (Print) BRITISH JOURNAL OF AMERICAN LEGAL STUDIES Editor-in-Chief: Dr Anne Richardson Oakes, Birmingham City University Associate Editors Birmingham City University Student Sarah Cooper, Birmingham City University Editorial Assistants 2015-2016 Dr Haydn Davies, Birmingham City University Lorna Arnold Prof Julian Killingley, Birmingham City University Lorenza Simonassi Nogueirra Jack Rogers Prof Jon Yorke, Birmingham City University Seth Barrett Tillman, National University of Graduate Editorial Assistants 2015-2016 Ireland, Maynooth Ilaria Di Gioia Daniel Gough Amna Nazir Alice Storey Editorial Board Hon Joseph A Greenaway Jr, Circuit Judge 3rd Circuit, US Court of Appeals Hon Raymond J McKoski, Circuit Judge (retired), 19th Judicial Circuit Court, IL.
    [Show full text]
  • Disputed Confessions and Miscarriages of Justice in Britain: Expert Psychological and Psychiatric Evidence in the Court of Appeal
    Disputed Confessions and Miscarriages of Justice in Britain: Expert Psychological and Psychiatric Evidence in the Court of Appeal GISLI GUDJONSSON* I. INTRODUCTION 2006 CanLIIDocs 133 nly in the last two decades have scientists taken serious interest in false Oconfessions made during custodial interrogations.' Many high-profile cases of false confessions have been reported,' but these are "only the tip of a much larger iceberg". 3 As the frequency of false confessions is unknown and there is no adequate method of calculating precise incident rates, there continues to be perennial debate over the numbers.' Sigurdsson and his colleagues found a high prevalence rate history of reported false confessions (12 percent) among Ice- Professor Gisli H. Gudjonsson, Department of Psychology (PO 78), Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AF, England. Email: <[email protected]>. This article is based on a paper presented at the International Conference on Avoiding Wrongful Conviction, Fairmont Hotel, Winnipeg, Manitoba, 20- 22 October 2005. Mark Powlson, "Guilty innocents: the road to false confessions", Editorial (1994) 344 The Lancet 1447-50. 2 Gisli H. Gudjonsson, The Psychology of Interrogations and Confessions: A Handbook (Chich- ester: John Wiley & Sons, 2003) [Gudjonsson, Interrogations and Confessions]; Saul M. Kas- sin & Gisli H. Gudjonsson, "The Psychology of Confessions: A Review of the Literature and Issues" (2004) 5 Psychological Science in the Public Interest 35 [Kassin & Gudjons- son]. 3 Steven A. Drizin & Richard A. Leo, "The Problem of False Confessions in the Post-DNA World" (2004) 82 N.C.L. Rev. 891. 4 Kassin & Gudjonsson, supra note 2 at 48.
    [Show full text]