DOCSLIB.ORG

RES IPSA LOQUITUR Faculty News

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

RES IPSA LOQUITUR Faculty news Chapman University School of Law Faculty Update Available online at: www.chapman.edu/law/news/resipsa.asp FALL EDITION 2011 DEEPA BADRINARYANA published MARQUETTE LAW REVIEW, and Prosecuting Environmental Challenges of Climate- Nazi War Criminals in the UK and Lessons Nuclear Fusion: a Case Study of India in the For Today: Will History Repeat Itself? in the JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LONDON’S HUMAN POLICY, and International Law in a Time of RIGHTS REVIEW. Climate Change, Sovereignty Loss, and Economic Unity in the PROCEEDINGS OF THE TOM BELL published Jurisprudence in a AMERICAN SOCIETY OF INTERNATIONAL LAW Polycentric Legal Order in the GRIFFITH 104TH ANNUAL MEETING. LAW REVIEW, and What the Third Amendment Teaches About the Constitutional Deepa presented “All But Migration: Meaning of “Property” in the WILLIAM AND Reconciling Global Trade with Globalization MARY BILL OF RIGHTS JOURNAL. of Climate Change by Finding the New ‘Bottom’” at the Law and Society Annual DANIEL B. BOGART published the Meeting in San Francisco; “Global Warming Second Edition of COMMERCIAL LEASING: and India's Constitutional Rights” at a TRANSACTIONAL PRIMER (Carolina Academic Conference on Climate Justice at the Press) with co-author Celeste Hammond. University of Irvine School of Law; Danny also contributed to the 16th release of “Governing Climate Change, Achieving the treatise FRIEDMAN ON LEASES (PLI). Human Security, Sustaining Democracy” at the International Studies Association Annual Danny presented “Professors’ Roundtable, Meeting in Montreal; and, “Litigation and an In-Depth Analysis of the Year’s Most Climate Justice, Civil Litigation as a Tool for Important Legal Developments” at the 30th Regulating Climate Change” at the 25th Annual Real Property Law Section Retreat in Monsanto Conference on Tort Law and La Jolla, California. Jurisprudence at Valparaiso School of Law. TOM CAMPBELL published Severability Deepa received the Chapman University of Statutes in the HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL. Award for Curriculum Innovation in Sustainability Education. He was a panelist at the American Academy of Arts & Sciences, National Commission on MICHAEL BAZYLER published From the Humanities and Social Sciences in "Lamentation and Liturgy to Litigation": The Chicago, where he discussed the importance Holocaust-Era Restitution Movement as a of the humanities in higher education and Model for Bringing Armenian Genocide-Era elements of humanities and social sciences in Restitution Suits in American Courts in the the study of law and business. Res Ipsa Loquitur: Faculty News 1 Tom also presented “Dimensions of the State ANTHONY T. (“TOM”) CASO published Budget Deficit in California” and “Systemic an op-ed in the LOS ANGELES DAILY Solutions to the Debt Crisis in State and JOURNAL entitled Global Warming Isn't the Municipal Governments” at the Hoover Real Issue. Together with students in the Institution Conference on State and Constitutional Jurisprudence Clinic, Tom Municipal Default at Stanford University. filed briefs in the United States Supreme Court in American Electric Power Corp. v. TIMOTHY A. CANOVA published Black Connecticut. He also filed an amicus brief in Swans and Black Elephants in Plain Sight: support of certiorari in Sackett v. EPA. Tom an Empirical Review of Central Bank also filed briefs in the Ninth Circuit Court of Independence in the CHAPMAN LAW REVIEW, Appeals in Montana Shooting Sports and The Public Option: The Case for Parallel Association v. Holder, and in the California Public Banking Institutions, a policy paper in Court of Appeal in Vargas v. Salinas. the NEW AMERICA FOUNDATION, NEXT SOCIAL CONTRACT INITIATIVE. MARISA S. CIANCIARULO published Batterers as Agents of the State: Challenging Tim presented “A Federal Reserve for the the Public/Private Distinction in Intimate 21st Century” to the New America Partner Violence-Based Asylum Claims, in Foundation in Washington, D.C.; “The the HARVARD JOURNAL OF LAW & GENDER. Future of the Federal Reserve” to the Roosevelt Institute in New York City; and, She participated in a an Anti-Defamation “Central Banking in U.S. Constitutional Law League debate on Birthright Citizenship with and History” at the Loyola University of Orange County Superior Court Judge (ret.) New Orleans College of Law Scholarly Jim Gray at Chapman University School of Program. Law. Tim also delivered presentations on Marisa continues to serve on the Board of numerous panels, including “Shift Happens: Directors of Concern America, a non-profit Financial and Regulatory Paradigms in organization that won Chapman's 2010-2011 Crisis” at the LatCrit South-North Exchange Albert Schweitzer Award for Excellence. in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic; “Credit Ratings Agencies Gone Wild” at the Marisa was selected Professor of the Year by West Coast Law & Society Retreat at Chapman law students for the 2010-2011 Southwestern University School of Law in school year. Los Angeles; and, “Wall Street to Main Street: The Future of Financial Regulation” M. KATHERINE B. DARMER published at the CHAPMAN LAW REVIEW Symposium on “Immutability' and Stigma: Towards a More the Future of Financial Regulation. Progressive Equal Protection Rights Discourse in the AMERICAN UNIVERSITY Tim appeared on a C-Span broadcast where JOURNAL OF GENDER, SOCIAL POLICY AND he addressed issues raised by the talk to the THE LAW; The Enduring Force of Scalia's New America Foundation. Tim also gave the Romer and Lawrence Dissents: The Case of keynote address, “Lawless Finance, Failing Proposition 8 in the BERKELEY LA RAZA States, and the Unfinished Agenda of the LAW JOURNAL; and, she co-edited NATIONAL United Nations,” at the annual meeting of the SECURITY, CIVIL LIBERTIES, AND THE WAR United Nations Association of Orange ON TERROR (Prometheus) with Richard D. County in Santa Ana. Fybel. Res Ipsa Loquitur: Faculty News 2 Katherine serves as the Chair of the Criminal Supreme Court” at the Detroit Mercy School Justice Section of the AALS. of Law in Detroit. BOBBY DEXTER presented “Interest John participated in a number of debates, Indenture of the Talented Tenth” at the including “Free Speech and Funeral Annual Meeting of the Law & Society Protests” at the Whittier Law School Association in San Francisco. He also Constitutional Rights Foundation; presented “Socratic Dialogue and “Birthright Citizenship and the 14th Circumventing the Risk of Shame” at the Amendment” at the Los Angeles Chapter of International Conference on Education and the Federalist Society; “The Constitutionality New Learning Technologies in Barcelona, of National Health Care” at the University of Spain. California, Irvine American Constitution Society and Federalist Society student JOHN EASTMAN published Chemerinsky’s chapters; “Same-Sex Marriage” at Syracuse Assault on the English Language, a Review Law School; “Citizens United” at the UCLA of Erwin Chemerinsky, The Conservative American Constitution Society; "Recent Assault on the Constitution in the Decisions by, and Pending Cases in, the U.S. CLAREMONT REVIEW OF BOOKS; Justice Supreme Court" at the Federal Bar Thomas: The Court’s Sole Natural Law Association of Orange County; “Must Jurist in the DETROIT MERCY LAW REVIEW; Government Lawyers Defend Laws They and the 2011 supplement to the Third Edition Think Are Unconstitutional?” at Stanford of THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL ORDER: Law School; “Is There a Conservative HISTORY, CASES, AND PHILOSOPHY Assault on the Constitution?” at the Mark (Anderson). Taper Auditorium in Los Angeles; “The ‘Gay Rights’ Appeals” at the San Francisco John presented “The Supreme Court at Mid- Bar Association; “Originalism or Living Term Conference” at Stanford Law School; Constitution” at Golden Gate University Law “The Contracts Clause and California’s School Federalist Society; and, “Wikileaks Pension Crisis” at the Federalist Society and National Security” at the World Affairs Western Regional Conference at the Ronald Council of Orange County. Reagan Presidential Library; “The Politicization of International Law” at the John appeared on numerous television and Lawfare Conference on Western World radio shows, including the Gil Gross Show, Radio; and, “Arizona’s SB1070” at the KGO-San Francisco); the Forum Show, Federalist Society’s Annual Faculty KQED-San Francisco); the Ray Appleton Conference in San Francisco. Show, KMJ-Fresno; Airtalk with Larry Mantle, KPCC-Pasadena; the Chris Reid John’s speeches included “Wheat, Weed & Show, KOGO-San Diego; America’s Nightly Obamacare: Are There Any Limits to the Scoreboard with David Aslam, Fox Business Commerce Clause?” at the inaugural meeting News; and, on KNRS-Radio in Salt Lake of the Bakersfield Lawyers Chapter of the City. Federalist Society in Bakersfield; “Citizenship and the Moral Foundations of John received the Silver Good Citizenship the American Regime” at the inaugural Medal from The National Society of the Sons conference of the Amherst Committee for the of the American Revolution, was named a American Founding in Washington, D.C.; Peter Jennings Scholar at the National and “Twentieth Anniversary of Justice Constitution Center, and received the Clarence Thomas’s Appointment to the Meritorious Service Award from the Sons of the Revolution. Res Ipsa Loquitur: Faculty News 3 JOHN HALL published Sex Offenders and Ernesto was also a speaker in “Getting Child Sex Tourism: The Case for Passport Started with a Scholarly Agenda,” at the Revocation in the VIRGINIA JOURNAL OF AALS Workshop for Pre-Tenured People
Recommended publications
  • Amended Canvass Ofresults General Election November 6, 2012

    Amended Canvass Ofresults General Election November 6, 2012

    STATE OF ALABAMA Amended Canvass ofResults General Election November 6, 2012 Pursua:lt to Chapter 14 of Title 17 of the Code of Alabama, 1975, we, the undersigned, hereby am\~nd the canvass of results certified on November 28, 2012, for the General Election for the offices of President of the United States and Chief Justice of the Alabama Supreme Court held in Alabama on Tuesday, November 6, 2012, and to incorporate the write-in votes reported by Wilcox County in said election. The amended canvass shows the correct tabulation of votes to be as recorded on the following pages. In Testimony Whereby, I have hereunto set my hand and affIxed the Great and Principal Seal of the State of Alal:>ama at the State Capitol, in the City nf Montgomery, on this the 17th day of December, in the year 2012­ Governor Attorney General ~an~ Secretary of State FOR PRESIDENT AND VICE-PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES BARACK OBAMA / Min ROMNEY / VIRGIL H. GOODE, JR. / GARY JOHNSON / JILL STEIN / JOE BIDEN (D) PAUL RYAN (R) JAMES CLYMER (I) JIM GRAY (I) CHERI HONKALA (I) WI Total Vote County Total Votes Total Votes Total Votes Total Votes Total Votes Total Votes Total Votes Autauga 6,363 17,379 31 137 22 41 23,973 Baldwin 18,424 66,016 122 607 169 153 85,491 Barbour 5,912 5,550 9 32 6 8 11,517 Bibb 2,202 6,132 13 38 9 26 8,420 Blount 2,970 20,757 59 170 50 54 24,060 Bullock 4,061 1,251 4 3 3 5,322 Butler 4,374 5,087 9 20 6 6 9,502 Calhoun 15,511 30,278 85 291 92 107 46,364 Chambers 6,871 7,626 21 78 15 18 14,629 Cherokee 2,132 7,506 36 79 26 13 9,792 Chilton 3,397
  • Libertarian Party National Convention | First Sitting May 22-24, 2020 Online Via Zoom

    Libertarian Party National Convention | First Sitting May 22-24, 2020 Online Via Zoom

    LIBERTARIAN PARTY NATIONAL CONVENTION | FIRST SITTING MAY 22-24, 2020 ONLINE VIA ZOOM CURRENT STATUS: FINAL APPROVAL DATE: 9/12/20 PREPARED BY ~~aryn ,~nn ~ar~aQ, LNC SECRETARY TABLE OF CONTENTS CONVENTION FIRST SITTING DAY 1-OPENING 3 CALL TO ORDER 3 CONVENTION OFFICIALS AND COMMITTEE CHAIRS 3 CREDENTIALS COMMITTEE REPORT 4 ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA FOR THE FIRST SITTING 7 CONVENTION FIRST SITTING DAY 1-ADJOURNMENT 16 CONVENTION FIRST SITTING DAY 2 -OPENING 16 CREDENTIALS COMMITTEE UPDATE 16 PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION 18 PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION QUALIFICATION TOKENS 18 PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION SPEECHES 23 PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION – BALLOT 1 24 PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION – BALLOT 2 26 PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION – BALLOT 3 28 PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION – BALLOT 4 32 CONVENTION FIRST SITTING DAY 2 -ADJOURNMENT 33 CONVENTION FIRST SITTING DAY 3 -OPENING 33 CREDENTIALS COMMITTEE UPDATE 33 VICE-PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION 35 VICE-PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION QUALIFICATION TOKENS 35 VICE-PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION SPEECHES 37 ADDRESS BY PRESIDENTIAL NOMINEE DR. JO JORGENSEN 37 VICE-PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION – BALLOT 1 38 VICE-PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION – BALLOT 2 39 VICE-PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION – BALLOT 3 40 STATUS OF TAXATION 41 ADJOURNMENT TO CONVENTION SECOND SITTING 41 SPECIAL THANKS 45 Appendix A – State-by-State Detail for Election Results 46 Appendix B – Election Anomalies and Other Convention Observations 53 2020 NATIONAL CONVENTION | FIRST SITTING VIA ZOOM – FINAL Page 2 LEGEND: text to be inserted, text to be deleted, unchanged existing text. All vote results, points of order, substantive objections, and rulings will be set off by BOLD ITALICS. The LPedia article for this convention can be found at: https://lpedia.org/wiki/NationalConvention2020 Recordings for this meeting can be found at the LPedia link.
  • Debate on Birthright Citizenship

    Debate on Birthright Citizenship

    Florida International University College of Law eCollections Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship 2011 Debate on Birthright Citizenship John Eastman Dr. Chapman University Fowler School of Law, [email protected] Ediberto Román Florida International University College of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ecollections.law.fiu.edu/faculty_publications Part of the Fourteenth Amendment Commons Recommended Citation John Eastman Dr. and Ediberto Román, Debate on Birthright Citizenship , 6 FIU L. Rev. 293 (2011). Available at: https://ecollections.law.fiu.edu/faculty_publications/304 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at eCollections. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of eCollections. For more information, please contact [email protected]. +(,121/,1( Citation: 6 FIU L. Rev. 293 2010-2011 Provided by: FIU College of Law Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline Thu Jun 22 14:05:02 2017 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/License -- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text. Debate on Birthright Citizenship Dr. John Eastman*& Professor Ediberto Roman' Dr. John C. Eastman is the Henry Salvatori Professor of Law & Community Service at Chapman University School of Law, specializing in Constitutional Law and Legal History. He also served as Dean from 2007 to 2010, when he stepped down to pursue a campaign for Califor- nia Attorney General. He is also the founding Director of the Center for Constitutional Juris- prudence, a public interest law firm affiliated with the Claremont Institute for the Study of Statesmanship and Political Philosophy.
  • History, Tradition, the Supreme Court, and the First Amendment Erwin Chemerinsky

    History, Tradition, the Supreme Court, and the First Amendment Erwin Chemerinsky

    Hastings Law Journal Volume 44 | Issue 4 Article 7 1-1993 History, Tradition, the Supreme Court, and the First Amendment Erwin Chemerinsky Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Erwin Chemerinsky, History, Tradition, the Supreme Court, and the First Amendment, 44 Hastings L.J. 901 (1993). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal/vol44/iss4/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. History, Tradition, the Supreme Court, and the First Amendment by ERWIN CHEMERINSKY* Introduction My advice to an attorney litigating a case before the current Supreme Court is to buy a copy of Blackstone's history of the common law or at least a good book on legal history. In virtually every area of constitutional law, the Supreme Court increasingly is relying on tradition as its guide in decisionmaking. Repeatedly, the Supreme Court has de- nied constitutional protection by holding that the claimed right was not historically protected. The Court is often explicit in stating that rights should be protected only if there has been a tradition of judicial safe- guards, and its analysis frequently is accompanied by a lengthy exegesis on common-law practices. I believe that this is a perverse and undesirable method of interpret- ing the Constitution. What has been done in the past cannot answer normatively what the law should be in the future.
  • Legal Ethics

    Legal Ethics

    642 THE GEORGETOWN JOURNAL OF LEGAL ETHICS IDEOLOGY, JUDICIAL SELECTION AND JUDICIAL ETHICS ERWIN CHEMERINSKY Reprinted from THE GEORGETOWN JOURNAL OF LEGAL ETHICS Volume 2, Number 3, Winter 1989 Copyright © 1989 Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 643 Ideology, Judicial Selection and Judicial Ethics ERWIN CHEMERINSKY* In the fail of 1986, there was a bitter fight against the retention of three members of the California Supreme Court, Rose Bird, Joseph Grodin, and Cruz Reynoso. Exactly a year later, the nation's attention focused on the battle over Robert Bork's confirmation to the United States Supreme Court. There were ironic parallels between these two events. In both instances, pub- lic opinion and media reporting played an unprecedented role in the judicial selection process. In each situation, there were arguments over whether the candidates' ideology should be a major factor in the evaluations. Liberals in California argued that assuring judicial inde- pendence required that the evaluation be limited to the justices' competence; that the individuals' ideology and prior votes should play no role in the re- tention election. But the sides were reversed in tflMMMMBtfMHMMWM the liberals who ^rgUcd that B<^^^~^v^ml^giig^t^bmtKHmmK tiv&jfem••91& prior votes asri^Bi^gJHBB^rtii^ Conservatives argued that evaluation should be limited to the nominee's competence—that his ide- ology and prior votes should play no role in the Senate's confirmation decision. A cynic might observe that these experiences reflect a pattern of public rhetoric. If jjnp |n nil kill liriHTfihi liiffti jiniiWHi iilmii ni'^nTiTfrrMTITri'P as an issue in your arguments; bat if your candidate's positions ate against the weight of public opinion, you maintain that ideology is irrelevant and that judicial candidates should be evaluated solely on the basis of profes- sional qualifications.
  • OPINION and DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH; GAIL J

    OPINION and DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH; GAIL J

    FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KRISTIN M. PERRY; SANDRA B. STIER; PAUL T. KATAMI; JEFFREY J. ZARRILLO, Plaintiffs-Appellees, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee, v. EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., in his official capacity as Governor of California; KAMALA D. HARRIS, in her official capacity as Attorney General of California; MARK B. HORTON, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health & State Registrar of Vital Statistics; LINETTE SCOTT, in her official capacity as Deputy Director of Health Information & Strategic Planning for the California Department of Public Health; PATRICK O’CONNELL, in his official capacity as Clerk-Recorder for the County of Alameda; DEAN C. LOGAN, in his official capacity as Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk for the County of Los Angeles, Defendants, 1569 1570 PERRY v. BROWN HAK-SHING WILLIAM TAM, Intervenor-Defendant, and DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH; GAIL J. No. 10-16696 KNIGHT; MARTIN F. GUTIERREZ; D.C. No. MARK A. JANSSON; 3:09-cv-02292- PROTECTMARRIAGE.COM-YES ON 8, VRW A PROJECT OF CALIFORNIA RENEWAL, as official proponents of Proposition 8, Intervenor-Defendants-Appellants. KRISTIN M. PERRY; SANDRA B. STIER; PAUL T. KATAMI; JEFFREY J. ZARRILLO, Plaintiffs-Appellees, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee, v. EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., in his official capacity as Governor of California; KAMALA D. HARRIS, in her official capacity as Attorney General of California; MARK B. HORTON, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health & State Registrar of Vital Statistics; PERRY v. BROWN 1571 LINETTE SCOTT, in her official capacity as Deputy Director of Health Information & Strategic Planning for the California Department of Public Health; PATRICK O’CONNELL, in his official capacity as Clerk-Recorder for the County of Alameda; DEAN C.
  • Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Professor of Law UC Berkeley Law School

    Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Professor of Law UC Berkeley Law School

    The Bay Area Bankruptcy Forum and our Co-sponsors Present Round-up of Current Supreme Court Cases - Focusing on Those Most Important to Bankruptcy Lawyers and Accountants Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Professor of Law UC Berkeley Law School Erwin Chemerinsky became the 13th Dean of Berkeley Law on July 1, 2017, when he joined the faculty as the Jesse H. Choper Distinguished Professor of Law. Prior to assuming this position, from 2008-2017, he was the founding Dean and Distinguished Professor of Law, and Raymond Pryke Professor of First Amendment Law, at University of California, Irvine School of Law, with a joint appointment in Political Science. Before that he was the Alston and Bird Professor of Law and Political Science at Duke University from 2004-2008, and from 1983- 2004 was a professor at the University of Southern California Law School, including as the Sydney M. Irmas Professor of Public Interest Law, Legal Ethics, and Political Science. He also has taught at DePaul College of Law and UCLA Law School. He teaches Constitutional Law, First Amendment Law, Federal Courts, Criminal Procedure, and Appellate Litigation. He is the author of ten books, including The Case Against the Supreme Court, published by Viking in 2014, and two books published by Yale University Press in 2017, Closing the Courthouse Doors: How Your Constitutional Rights Became Unenforceable and Free Speech on Campus (with Howard Gillman). He also is the author of more than 200 law review articles. He writes a weekly column for the Orange County Register, monthly columns for the ABA Journal and the Daily Journal, and frequent op-eds in newspapers across the country.
  • Frontier Project Candidate Elected

    Frontier Project Candidate Elected

    THE PARTY OF PRINCIPLE® LP.org ELECTION RESULTS SEE PAGE 10 Quarter 3, 2020 THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER OF THE LIBERTARIAN PARTY Vol. 50, Issue 3 FrontierLP Project News candidate elected Marshall Burt’s historic statehouse win is first since 2002, fifth in party history By Andy Craig registered voter in the district many times “We must make Wyoming the most at- Maryland over, engaging in both persuasion and tractive state to do business in and inno- careful tracking of the state of the race. Pa- vate. We need to begin diversifying our or the first time in a generation, a zell also worked closely in the community economy so that crises like this do not Libertarian has been elected to a to secure key endorsements and support have such a big impact on our families in state legislature. Marshall Burt, a from local leaders. the future.” Ftrack inspector for the Union Pacific rail- LNC Chair Joe Bishop-Henchman Republican and Democratic mem- road and Marine Corps veteran, defeat- sees Burt’s victory as a vindication for the bers of the House also reached out to ed a long-time Democratic incumbent Frontier Project’s model. “It’s time for the Burt, offering their congratulations and to represent Wyoming’s House District Libertarian Party to get out of start-up expressing their eagerness to work with 39. Burt’s campaign was spearheaded by mode. Winning elections for state legisla- Wyoming’s first third-party legislator in Apollo Pazell, candidate support special- State Representative-Elect ture is a crucial step for the party’s growth, more than a century.
  • The Rehnquist Court and Criminal Procedure Stephen F

    The Rehnquist Court and Criminal Procedure Stephen F

    Notre Dame Law School NDLScholarship Journal Articles Publications 2002 The Rehnquist Court and Criminal Procedure Stephen F. Smith Notre Dame Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/law_faculty_scholarship Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, and the Courts Commons Recommended Citation Stephen F. Smith, The Rehnquist Court and Criminal Procedure, 73 U. Colo. L. Rev. 1337 (2002). Available at: https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/law_faculty_scholarship/448 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Publications at NDLScholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of NDLScholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE REHNQUIST COURT AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE STEPHEN F. SMITH* INTRODUCTION This Conference, like a growing body of academic literature, discusses the phenomenon of conservative judicial activism. Has the Rehnquist Court been "activist"-whatever that means-in its approach to constitutional adjudication? With recent rumors that Chief Justice Rehnquist will soon announce his retirement, this is a particularly topical subject. Indeed, even now, one sees the first chiselings of the Court's epitaph, with Professor Erwin Chemerinsky, for example, declaring that the Rehnquist Court has been nothing short of a "disaster" due to its rampant conservative activism.1 The question of whether, and to what extent, the Rehnquist Court is "activist" or practices the "restraint" that judicial conservatives traditionally preach will likely figure prominently in the ultimate assessment of the Court's jurisprudence. Much of this Conference addresses this question within the context of the revival of federalism-based limits on Congress over the last decade.
  • Letter to Supreme Court (Erwin Chemerinsky Is Mad. Why You Should Care) Barry Friedman

    Letter to Supreme Court (Erwin Chemerinsky Is Mad. Why You Should Care) Barry Friedman

    Vanderbilt Law Review Volume 69 | Issue 4 Article 4 5-2016 Letter to Supreme Court (Erwin Chemerinsky is Mad. Why You Should Care) Barry Friedman Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr Part of the Supreme Court of the United States Commons Recommended Citation Barry Friedman, Letter to Supreme Court (Erwin Chemerinsky is Mad. Why You Should Care), 69 Vanderbilt Law Review 995 (2019) Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol69/iss4/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vanderbilt Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Letter To Supreme Court (Erwin Chemerinsky is Mad. Why You Should Care.) Barry Friedman* I. THE PROBLEM WITH CHEMERINSKY'S "CASE" ..................... 997 II. THE CASE FOR ERWIN CHEMERINSKY ............................... 1001 III. THE CONSERVATIVE CASE AGAINST THE SUPREM E COURT ........................................................ 1002 IV. W HAT THE PEOPLE THINK ................................................. 1004 V . TIM E FOR CHANGE? ........................ ............... ................. .. 1007 VI. BACK TO THE (MERITS) FUTURE ........................................ 1014 Dear Supreme Court: You may be wondering why I'm writing. Let me tell you. I was asked to participate in a symposium about Erwin Chemerinsky's The Case Against the Supreme Court. I'm sure you know Chemerinsky. His book is a stinging condemnation of much that you do. And his goal-in which he does not nearly succeed-is to show your work to be unacceptable to the left and the right alike. He fancies that he is offering a non-partisan, non-ideological, non-denominational challenge to your hegemony.
  • UCLA LAW MAGAZINE PRESORTED UCLA School of Law, Office of the Dean FIRST CLASS MAIL Box 951476, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1476 U.S

    UCLA LAW MAGAZINE PRESORTED UCLA School of Law, Office of the Dean FIRST CLASS MAIL Box 951476, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1476 U.S

    Final Cover 3/26/01 10:13 AM Page 1 UCLA LAW MAGAZINE PRESORTED UCLA School of Law, Office of the Dean FIRST CLASS MAIL Box 951476, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1476 U.S. POSTAGE PAID www.law.ucla.edu UCLA [email protected] APRIL 2001 Return Service Requested Friday, April 20, 1 P.M. “The Changing Face of Practice: Perspectives from the Profession and the Law School” A Symposium to mark the 30th Anniversary of the UCLA School of Law Clinical Program with a dinner and tribute to Professor David Binder UCLA LAW MAGAZINE UC L A featuring Shirley M. Hufstedler LAW MAGAZINE The Magazine of the UCLA School of Law MCLE credit approved for 2.5 hours general credit and 1.75 ethics credit Vol. 24 L No. 1 L Fall.Winter.2000.2001 Please call (310) 825-7376 or e-mail [email protected] • Saturday, April 21, 9 A.M.- 6 P.M. AALS Colloquium: Equal Access to Justice Please call (310) 206-9155 or e-mail [email protected] 3030 YearsYears ofof Clinical Clinical LegalLegal EducationEducation • Tuesday, April 24, NOON UCLA Law Alumni of the Year Awards A Salute to The Honorable Elwood Lui [Ret.] ’69 Public/Community Service and N Skip Brittenham ’70 FALL.WINTER.2000–2001 Professional Achievement Century Plaza Hotel Please call (310) 206-1121 or e-mail [email protected] • Tuesday, April 24, 4:30 P.M. The Twelfth Annual Public Interest Awards UCLA School of Law, Room 1430 Please call (310) 206-9155 or e-mail [email protected] MAY 2001 Sunday, May 20, 2 P.M.
  • LNC Region 4 Representative Report April 2018

    LNC Region 4 Representative Report April 2018

    LNC Region 4 Representative Report April 2018 Nevada: No Report Submitted. California: In August 2017 membership had gone down to 897 members after losing people that joined to be delegates to the National Convention in 2016 but by the end of March 2018 membership was up to 1012 which is an increase of 12% In November LPC sent out a mailing to all national members that weren’t members of the LPC. The mailing cost approximately $1,100 from 86 members joined directly from that mailing with first year dues totaling $5,260, a 478% return. On January 5, 2016 LPC had 120,578 registered Libertarians in California and as of January 2, 2018 there were 140,001 registered Libertarians, an increase of 16%. 2018 Convention: So far this year we LPC has pre-sold 164 packages for attendees with 119 confirmed delegates. Historically, many packages sell the week before the event as well as at the door so these numbers should go up. In 2017 total attendance was 142 people with 93 delegates which was already up from the previous years. This leaves LPC on track to have the largest state convention in at least a decade. Confirmed speakers: Governor Bill Weld Congressman Tom Campbell Judge Jim Gray Ed and Alicia Clark Nicholas Sarwark Larry Sharpe Matt Welch Brando Eaton Avens O’Brien Maxine Doogan Melinda Pilsbury-Foster and Brock D’Avignon Jim Turney Sophia Cope Kevin Shaw Confirmed events: Moderated Q&A with Bill Weld (Matt Welch moderating) Governor candidates’ debate (Zoltan and Nickolas Wildstar) LNC chair candidates’ debate (Nicholas Sarwark, Joshua Smith and Alicia Dearn) Elected officials forum (Jim Turney, Jeff Hewitt and Susan Marie Weber) State Candidates Forum (many of our candidates) We have 20 candidates for statewide offices and legislative seats: Governor: Nickolas Wildstar and Zoltan Istvan Lt.