DOCSLIB.ORG

1 Table 1 Occurrence of Animal Groups in Dung Pads Surveyed From

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 Table 1 Occurrence of Animal Groups in Dung Pads Surveyed From Table 1 Occurrence of animal groups in dung pads surveyed from the Western Ghats of Pune district. Sr. Group of Number of Dung pad Total No. Organisms number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 1 Earthworm 15 15 12 20 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 12 164 2 Round worm 0 0 0 5 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 3 Snail 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 4 Ants 25 20 10 5 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 10 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 69 5 Dung beetle 10 9 5 7 10 15 5 2 3 2 15 11 10 2 1 16 2 30 25 16 196 6 Hister beetle 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 7 Earwigs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 10 8 Rove beetle 2 1 0 0 3 4 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 9 Solider fly 5 3 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 0 0 4 0 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 32 10 Green 2 2 2 1 2 2 4 2 2 1 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 29 bottle fly 11 Wood louse 15 10 20 15 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 12 11 0 15 0 0 0 0 105 12 Pseudo 3 2 4 2 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 scorpion 13 Carrion beetle 6 4 7 5 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 2 12 0 0 5 0 0 42 14 Drosophila 20 15 30 11 5 7 0 0 0 6 7 0 8 9 0 0 0 5 4 5 132 15 Damselfly 0 0 0 0 2 4 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 17 16 Mites 50 20 30 10 12 0 0 0 15 20 30 15 0 0 12 10 11 19 0 0 254 17 Centipede 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 3 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 18 Millipede 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 10 19 Toad 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 8 20 Bird 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 1 Table 2:- Dung beetle diversity in Western Ghats of Pune district (2008-2012). Tribe Tribe Name Genus Sp.No. Species No. I. Scarabaeini 1. Scarabaeus L. 1 Scarabaeus andrewsi (Felsche) ( 6 species) 2 Scarabaeus devotus (Redt) 3 Scarabaeus sanctus (F.) 4 Scarabaeus gangeticus.( Cast) 5 Scarabaeus erichsoni (Har) 6 Scarabeus sacer (L.) 2. Gymnopleurus 1 Gymnopleurus gemmatus (Harold) Iliger ( 10 species) 2 Gymnopleurus parvus. ( Macl.) 3 Gymnopleurus koenigi ( Fabricus) 4 Gymnopleurus flagellates (F.) 5 Gymnopleurus cyaneus (F.) 6 Gymnopleurus bombayensis (Arrow) 7 Gymnopleurus spilotus (Macl.) 8 Gymnopleurus xthiopes ( sharp) 9 Gymnopleurus dejeani ( Cast) 10 Gymnopleurus sumptuosus. (Cast.) II Sisyphini Sisyphus Latr (1 species) 1 Sisyphus neglectus (Gery) III Coprini 1. Liatongus (Reitt) 1 Liatongus rhinoceros (Sp.n.) ( 4 species) 2 Liatongus indicus (Arrow) 3 Liatongus vertagus (F.) 4 Liatongus rhadamistus (F.) 2. Onthophagus 1 Onthophagus sagittarus (F.) Latr.( 29 species) 2 2 Onthophagus catta (F.) 3 Onthophagus amplexus ( Sharp) 4 Onthophagus descedens ( Sharp) 5 Onthophagus mirandus (Arrow) 6 Onthophagus imperator ( Cast) 7 Onthophagus productus (Arrow.) 8 Onthophagus gagets ( Hope) 9 Onthophagus ochreatus (d’ Orb) 10 Onthophagus cavia ( Boue) 11 Onthophagus oculatus (Arrow) 12 Onthophagus pacificus (Lanb) 13 Onthophagus dynastoides (Arrow) 14 Onthophagus grriscosotosus (Arrow) 15 Onthophagus amphinasus (Arrow) 16 Onthophagus pactolus (F.) 17 Onthophagus variegates (F.) 18 Onthophagus fuscopunctatus (F.) 19 Onthophagus orientalis (Har) 20 Onthophagus bonasus (F.) 21 Onthophagus seniculus (F.) 22 Onthophagus madoqua (Arrow) 23 Onthophagus rana (Arrow) 24 Onthophagus andrewesi (Arrow) 25 Onthophagus cervus (F.) 26 Onthophagus regalis ( Arrow) 27 Onthophagus coeruleicollis, (Arrow.) 28 Onthophagus pygmeus (Sechall) 3 29 Onthophagus vividus (Arrow.) 3. Chironitis Lanb. 1 Chironitis indicus (Lanb.) ( 1 species) 4. Onitis Fab. 1 Onitis excavatus (Arrow) ( 3 species) 2 Onitis humerosus (Pallas) 3 Onitis philemon (F.) 5. Heliocopris Burn 1 Heliocopris gigas (Linnaeus) ( 3 species) 2 Heliocopris tyronus (Thoms) 3 Heliocopris dominus (Bates) 6. Copris Geoffroy 1 Copris delicatus (Arrow) ( 8 species) 2 Copris indicus (Gill) 3 Copris repertus (Walk) 4 Copris numa (Lansb) 5 Copris andrewesi (Wat) 6 Copris cribratus (Gill) 7 Copris furciceps (Felsche) 8 Copris davisoni (Wat) 7. Phalops Er. 1 Phalops candezei (Lansb) ( 4 species) 2 Phalops divisus (Wied) 3 Phalops cyanescens (d’Orb) 4 Phalops olivaceus (Lansb) 8. Cacobius Thoms 1 Cacobius diminutivus (Walk) ( 8 species) 2 Cacobius torticornis (Arrow) 3 Cacobius unicornis (F.) 4 Cacobius intermis (Arrow) 5 Cacobius gallinus (Arrow) 6 Cacobius meridionalis (Bouc.) 7 Cacobius vuleanus (F.) 4 8 Cacobius denticolis (Har) 9. Cassolus Sharp 1 Cassolus humeralis (Arrow) ( 1 species) 10. Oniticellus Serv 1 Oniticellus pallipes (F.) ( 4 species) 2 Oniticellus pallens (Oliv) 3 Oniticellus spinipes (Roth) 4 Oniticellus cinctus (F.) 11. Drepanocerus 1 Drepanocerus sinicus (Har) Kirby( 3 species) 2 Drepanocerus runicus (Arrow) 3 Drepanocerus exsul (Sharp) 5 Table 3:- Diversity, feeding and nesting behavior of dung beetles from Western Ghats of Pune District. Sr. No. Genus No. of Feeding Nesting species behavior behavior 1 Scarabaeus L. 6 D R 2 Gymnopleurus Iliger 10 D R 3 Sisyphus Latr 1 D R 4 Liatongus (Reitt) 4 D D 5 Onthophagus Latr 29 C, D T . 6 Chironitis Lanb. 1 D D 7 Onitis Fab. 3 D T 8 Heliocopris Burn 3 D T 9 Copris Geoffroy 8 D T 10 Phalops Er. 4 D D 11 Cacobius Thoms 8 C, D D 12 Cassolus Sharp 1 D D 13 Oniticellus Serv 4 D T 14 Drepanocerus Kirby 3 D D Legend –Feeding behavior: D = Dung, C= Carrion. Nesting behavior: R= Roller, D=Dweller, T=Tunneler. 6 Table 4: Abundance of dung beetles in study area (2008-2012) using ANOVA test. Region Mean 95% confidence SD Range Median Average interval for mean absolute deviation from median Bhimashankar 324.17 191.0 thru 457.4 264 760-0.00 319.0 222 Junnar 281.08 147.9 thru 414.3 238 654.0- 0.000 279.0 203 Maval 257.67 124.5 thru 390.9 226 619.0 - 0.000 236.5 194 Paud 223.42 90.21 thru 356.6 204 558.0 -0.000 194.5 176 Velhe 235.00 101.8 thru 368.2 214. 580.0 -0.000 209.0 183 Bhor 280.00 146.8 thru 413.2 236 658.0 -2.000 268.0 200 7 Table 5A: Aerobic gut Bacteria (Average) in dung beetles from Western Ghats of Pune district. Sr.No. Bacteria Percentage 1 Rhodobacteriales 5.26% 2 Neisseriales 5.26% 3 Methylophillales 5.26% 4 Rhizobiales 5.26% 5 Actinomycetales 5.26% 6 Rhodospirillales 10.52% 7 Methylococcales 10.52% 8 Pseudomonadales 15.78% 9 Bacillales 15.78% 10 Lactobacillales 21.05% n=5 Table 5B: Anaerobic gut Bacteria (Average) in dung beetles from Western Ghats of Pune district. Sr.No. Bacteria Percentage 1 Clostrdiales 75% 2 Methanosarcinales 25% n=5 8 Table 6A: Aerobic gut Bacteria (Average) in carnivore beetles from Western Ghats of Pune district. Sr.No. Bacteria Percentage 1 Burkholderiales 3% 2 Actinomycetales 3% 3 Rhizobiales 10% 4 Pseudomonadales 13% 5 Lactobacillales 26% 6 Bacillales 45% n=2 Table 6B: Anaerobic gut Bacteria (Average) in carnivore beetles from Western Ghats of Pune district. Sr.No. Bacteria Percentage 1 Clostridiales 100% n=2 Table 7A: Aerobic gut Bacteria (Average) in herbivore beetles from Western Ghats of Pune district. Sr.No. Bacteria Percentage 1 Methanobacteriales 30% 3 Lactobacillales 30% 3 Bacteroidales 40% n=2 Table 7B: Anaerobic gut Bacteria (Average) in herbivore beetles from Western Ghats of Pune district. Sr.No. Bacteria Percentage 1 Clostridiales 100% n=2 9 Table 8: Bacterial fauna in cow dung and gut of dung beetles. Bacteria Cattle Gymnopleurus Sisyphus Onthophagus Copris Heliocopris dung Pseudomonadales - + - + - + Lactobacillales + + + + + + Bacillales + + + + + + Rhodobacterales - - - + + + Neisseriales - - - + - + Methylophillales - + + + + + Rhodospirillales - + - - + + Methylococcales + + + + + + Rhizobiales - - + + + + Actinomycetales + + + + - + Clostridiales + + + + + + Methanosarcinales + + + + + + Total order of bacteria 6 9 8 11 9 12 present Table 9: Average number of gut bacteria in five different genera of dung beetles and dung. Sr. Sample Average number of gut bacteria No. (Total Viable Count) 1 Cattle dung 0 .85 × 106/ ml 2 Sisyphus neglectus 0.85 × 106/ ml 3 Gymnopleurus illiger 0.92 × 106/ ml 4 Copris indicus 1.00 × 106/ ml 5 Onthophagus catta 1.58 × 106/ ml 6 Heliocopris gigas 2.99 × 106/ ml n=2 Note –Sisyphus and Gymnopleurus are rollers, while Copris, Onthophagus and Heliocopris are tunnelers. 10 Table 10:Presence of fungal colonies (isolated) in cow dung and gut of dung beetles. Fungal Cattle Gymnopleurus Sisyphus Onthophagus Copris Heliocopris Colonies dung Saccharomycetales + + - + - + Eurotales + - - - + - Mucorales + - - - - + Total fungal 3 1 0 1 1 2 colonies present Table 11: Mite species and their association with the dung beetle genera reported from the Western Ghats of Pune district.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Classical Biological Control of Arthropods in Australia
    Classical Biological Contents Control of Arthropods Arthropod index in Australia General index List of targets D.F. Waterhouse D.P.A. Sands CSIRo Entomology Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research Canberra 2001 Back Forward Contents Arthropod index General index List of targets The Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) was established in June 1982 by an Act of the Australian Parliament. Its primary mandate is to help identify agricultural problems in developing countries and to commission collaborative research between Australian and developing country researchers in fields where Australia has special competence. Where trade names are used this constitutes neither endorsement of nor discrimination against any product by the Centre. ACIAR MONOGRAPH SERIES This peer-reviewed series contains the results of original research supported by ACIAR, or material deemed relevant to ACIAR’s research objectives. The series is distributed internationally, with an emphasis on the Third World. © Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, GPO Box 1571, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia Waterhouse, D.F. and Sands, D.P.A. 2001. Classical biological control of arthropods in Australia. ACIAR Monograph No. 77, 560 pages. ISBN 0 642 45709 3 (print) ISBN 0 642 45710 7 (electronic) Published in association with CSIRO Entomology (Canberra) and CSIRO Publishing (Melbourne) Scientific editing by Dr Mary Webb, Arawang Editorial, Canberra Design and typesetting by ClarusDesign, Canberra Printed by Brown Prior Anderson, Melbourne Cover: An ichneumonid parasitoid Megarhyssa nortoni ovipositing on a larva of sirex wood wasp, Sirex noctilio. Back Forward Contents Arthropod index General index Foreword List of targets WHEN THE CSIR Division of Economic Entomology, now Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Entomology, was established in 1928, classical biological control was given as one of its core activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia's Biodiversity and Climate Change
    Australia’s Biodiversity and Climate Change A strategic assessment of the vulnerability of Australia’s biodiversity to climate change A report to the Natural Resource Management Ministerial Council commissioned by the Australian Government. Prepared by the Biodiversity and Climate Change Expert Advisory Group: Will Steffen, Andrew A Burbidge, Lesley Hughes, Roger Kitching, David Lindenmayer, Warren Musgrave, Mark Stafford Smith and Patricia A Werner © Commonwealth of Australia 2009 ISBN 978-1-921298-67-7 Published in pre-publication form as a non-printable PDF at www.climatechange.gov.au by the Department of Climate Change. It will be published in hard copy by CSIRO publishing. For more information please email [email protected] This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the: Commonwealth Copyright Administration Attorney-General's Department 3-5 National Circuit BARTON ACT 2600 Email: [email protected] Or online at: http://www.ag.gov.au Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian Government or the Minister for Climate Change and Water and the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and the Arts. Citation The book should be cited as: Steffen W, Burbidge AA, Hughes L, Kitching R, Lindenmayer D, Musgrave W, Stafford Smith M and Werner PA (2009) Australia’s biodiversity and climate change: a strategic assessment of the vulnerability of Australia’s biodiversity to climate change.
    [Show full text]
  • Dimensional Limits for Arthropod Eyes with Superposition Optics
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Vision Research 44 (2004) 2213–2223 www.elsevier.com/locate/visres Dimensional limits for arthropod eyes with superposition optics Victor Benno Meyer-Rochow a,*,Jozsef Gal b a School of Engineering and Sciences, International University Bremen (IUB), Campus Ring 6, Research II, D-28759 Bremen, Germany b Institute of Plant Biology, Biological Research Centre, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Temesvari krt. 62, H-6701 Szeged, Hungary Received 10 December 2003; received in revised form 16 April 2004 Abstract An essential feature of the superposition type of compound eye is the presence of a wide zone, which is transparent and devoid of pigment and interposed between the distal array of dioptric elements and the proximally placed photoreceptive layer. Parallel rays, collected by many lenses, must (through reflection or refraction) cross this transparent clear-zone in such a way that they become focused on one receptor. Superposition depends mostly on diameter and curvature of the cornea, size and shape of the crystalline cone, lens cylinder properties of cornea and cone, dimensions of the receptor cells, and width of the clear-zone. We examined the role of the latter by geometrical, geometric-optical, and anatomical measurements and concluded that a minimal size exists, below which effective superposition can no longer occur. For an eye of a given size, it is not possible to increase the width of the clear-zone cz ¼ dcz=R1 and decrease R2 (i.e., the radius of curvature of the distal retinal surface) and/or c ¼ dc=R1 without reaching a limit.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Genus Chironitis Lansberge, 1875 I: Taxonomy, Phylogeny and Zoogeography of the Palearctic Species (Col
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Entomologische Arbeiten Museum G. Frey Jahr/Year: 1987 Band/Volume: 35-36 Autor(en)/Author(s): Piera Fermin Martin Artikel/Article: Review of the Genus Chironitis Lansberge, 1875 I: Taxonomy, Phylogeny and Zoogeography of the Palearctic Species (Col. Scarabaeoidea, Onitini). 203-245 download Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ Ent. Arb. Mus. Frey 35/36, 1987 203 Review of the Genus Chironitis Lansberge, 1875 I: Taxonomy, Phylogeny and Zoogeography of the Palearctic Species (Col. Scarabaeoidea, Onitini) By F. Martin-Piera Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Madrid Abstract The taxonomical importance of the genitalia (cf and 9) within the genus Chironitis Lansberge, 1875, is studied. In agreement with the results of this study, the Status of twelve palearctic taxa pres- ently included in this genus is discussed. The conclusions obtained are summarized in the following list of species, subspecies, and new Synonyms: Ch. hungaricus hungaricus (Herbst, 1789) ssp. nov.; Ch. hungaricus irroratus (Rossi, 1790) st. nov. (= Ch. pamphilus (Menetries, 1849) syn. nov. and = Ch. phoehus Reitter, 1893 syn. nov.); Ch. furcifer (Rossi, 1792) (= Ch. klapperichi Balthasar, 1956 syn. nov.); Ch. moeris (Pallas, 1781); Ch. haroldi (Ballion, 1870); Ch. sterculms (Ballion, 1781); Ch. hauseri Reitter, 1893 and Ch. candezei Lansberge, 1875. Likewise, Ch. granulipennis Reitter, 1909 is considered to be a probably good species. The Status of Ch. klapperichi Balthasar, 1956 is also discussed. In agreement with these taxonomical conclusions, the corological data and current ideas about the paleogeographic evolution of the mediterranean basin, an hypothesis about the taxonomical (subspecific) divergence within Ch.
    [Show full text]
  • Delaware's Wildlife Species of Greatest Conservation Need
    CHAPTER 1 DELAWARE’S WILDLIFE SPECIES OF GREATEST CONSERVATION NEED CHAPTER 1: Delaware’s Wildlife Species of Greatest Conservation Need Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 7 Regional Context ........................................................................................................................................... 7 Delaware’s Animal Biodiversity .................................................................................................................... 10 State of Knowledge of Delaware’s Species ................................................................................................... 10 Delaware’s Wildlife and SGCN - presented by Taxonomic Group .................................................................. 11 Delaware’s 2015 SGCN Status Rank Tier Definitions................................................................................. 12 TIER 1 .................................................................................................................................................... 13 TIER 2 .................................................................................................................................................... 13 TIER 3 .................................................................................................................................................... 13 Mammals ....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Queensland Report
    IMPROVING SUSTAINABLE LAND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS IN QUEENSLAND USING DUNG BEETLES The information contained in this report is derived from samples collected during the 2001-02 NHT Queensland Dung Beetle Project. The report has been prepared for the landholders who assisted in the trapping of dung beetles throughout Queensland. It was prepared by Penny Edwards (Technical Co-ordinator) on behalf of the Management Committee of the Queensland Dung Beetle Project. Information contained herein may not be published without permission of AgForce Queensland or the author. Acknowledgements A special vote of thanks is extended to the many landholders around Queensland who took part in the dung beetle trapping program. Without their generous contribution of time and effort, the project would not have succeeded. The professional and enthusiastic involvement of the Queensland Beef Industry Institute extension officers, Graeme Elphinstone, Jill Aisthorpe, Dave Smith and Gavin Graham is gratefully acknowledged. Thanks are extended to the Project Management Committee; namely the chairman Richard Golden, secretary/scientific advisor Angus Macqueen, project manager Mick Alexander, landholder/Landcare representatives Bruce Lord, Murray Gibson and Greg Weekes, Bill Palmer from Natural Resources and Mines, Andrew Bourne and Mick Quirk from Primary Industries, and various representatives from Environmental Protection Agency. AgForce Queensland is acknowledged for its role in leading the project, with particular thanks to Geoff Trollip and Paul Shipley for support and assistance. Ross Storey (DPI Mareeba) is thanked for identifying the native dung beetles. Tom Weir (CSIRO Entomology) provided advice on identification of introduced dung beetles. David McClenaghan and CSIRO Entomology are thanked for providing photographs of dung beetles.
    [Show full text]
  • Forensic Entomology Research and Application in Southern Africa Page 2 of 8
    Forensic entomology research and application in AUTHORS: southern Africa: A scoping review Danisile Tembe1 Samson Mukaratirwa1* The use of forensic entomology is well established in the northern hemisphere, but is still emerging in AFFILIATIONS: 1School of Life Sciences, College of the southern hemisphere, where most of the current research is not explicitly undertaken in the context of Agriculture, Engineering and Science, forensics. In this review, we provide an update on the current status of forensic entomology research and University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa its application in relation to estimation of post-mortem interval in various criminal investigations ranging *Current: One Health Center for from murder cases, cases of human neglect and the poaching of wildlife in southern Africa, among Zoonoses and Tropical and Veterinary other issues. A literature search was conducted using Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus and EBSCOhost Medicine, Ross University School of Veterinary Medicine, Basseterre, databases. The studies reviewed were focused on arthropod diversity during different stages of carcass West Indies decomposition, effect of seasons on the abundance and diversity of carrion feeding arthropod species during carcass decomposition, and diurnal and nocturnal oviposition of forensically important insect CORRESPONDENCE TO: Danisile Tembe species during carcass decomposition. It was further observed that arthropod species that established on a decomposing carcass are potentially useful in the estimation of post-mortem interval and determining EMAIL: clues in cases of criminal investigations. The review confirmed the paucity of research in forensic [email protected] entomology, and its application in southern Africa. Future studies on the research and application of DATES: forensic entomology in various criminal investigation scenarios – such as murder cases, human neglect, Received: 21 Feb.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Dung Beetles Improve Post-Mining Land-Use Options?
    Coaltech project 8.2.8: Can dung beetles improve post-mining land-use options? SOIL REHABILITATION: CAN DUNG BEETLES IMPROVE POST-MINING LAND-USE OPTIONS? PROJECT NO: 8.2.8 Final report to May 2018 Page 1 Coaltech project 8.2.8: Can dung beetles improve post-mining land-use options? Project Leader: Dr. Jackie Dabrowski Project Team: Prof. Clarke H. Scholtz Dr. Wayne Truter Ms. Jessica Badenhorst (M.Sc. student) Mr. Gustav Venter (M.Sc. student) Contact details: [email protected] Tel +27 83 256 3159 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We, the authors, would like to acknowledge various contributions made to this work by the following individuals: Coaltech for project funding; Johann Beukes for his years of support and encouragement; The Coaltech Surface and Environment committee for guidance and feedback; Staff at mines including Martin Platt, Francois Grove, Annelie Rossouw, & Jaco Fick; Staff at the Scarab Research Group at the University of Pretoria including Christian Deschodt, Carmen Jacobs and Catherine Sole. We also thank Johan Van Wyk for field assistance. We especially thank Adrian Davis for his time and expertise identifying the beetles. Former students and project team members Ms. Alexandra Howard and Ms. Sarah Newman Page 2 Coaltech project 8.2.8: Can dung beetles improve post-mining land-use options? EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 BIOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS ON POST-MINING SOIL 18 1.1 HISTORY OF COAL MINING ...................................................................... 18 1.2 CONDITIONS ON OPEN-CAST COAL MINES ......................................................... 18 1.3 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF COAL MINING ....................................................... 19 1.4 MINE RECLAMATION ....................................................................................... 20 1.5 SOIL FERTILITY AND PLANT GROWTH...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Scarab Beetles in Human Culture
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Papers in Entomology Museum, University of Nebraska State November 2006 SCARAB BEETLES IN HUMAN CULTURE Brett C. Ratcliffe University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologypapers Part of the Entomology Commons Ratcliffe, Brett C., "SCARAB BEETLES IN HUMAN CULTURE" (2006). Papers in Entomology. 94. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologypapers/94 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Museum, University of Nebraska State at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Papers in Entomology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Coleopterists Society Monograph Number 5:85–101. 2006. SCARAB BEETLES IN HUMAN CULTURE BRETT C. RATCLIFFE Systematics Research Collections W-436 Nebraska Hall University of Nebraska Lincoln, NE 68588-0514, U.S.A. [email protected] Abstract The use of scarab beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) by primarily pre- and non-industrial peoples throughout the world is reviewed. These uses consist of (1) religion and folklore, (2) folk medicine, (3) food, and (4) regalia and body ornamentation. The use of scarabs in religion or cosmology, once widespread in ancient Egypt, exists only rarely today in other cultures. Scarabs have a minor role in folk medicine today although they may have been more important in the past. The predominant utilization of these beetles today, and probably in the past as well, is as food with emphasis on the larval stage. Lastly, particularly large or brightly colored scarabs (or their parts) are used (mostly in the New World) to adorn the body or as regalia.
    [Show full text]
  • A Contribution to the Faunistic Study of Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) from Mazandaran Province, Northern Iran
    Wiadomości Entomologiczne 35 (1) 31–40 Poznań 2016 A contribution to the faunistic study of Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) from Mazandaran Province, northern Iran Materiały do poznania fauny Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) prowincji Mazandaran w północnym Iranie 1 2 3 Marek BUNALSKI , Najmeh SAMIN , Hassan GHAHARI 1 Department of Entomology and Environmental Protection, University of Life Sciences, Dąbrowskiego 159, 60-594 Poznań, Poland; email: [email protected] 2 Young Researchers and Elite Club, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran 3 Department of Plant Protection, Yadegar – e- Imam Khomeini (RAH) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran; email: [email protected] ABSTRACT: In this faunistic work, the fauna of Scarabaeoidea from Mazandaran Province (northern Iran) is studied. In total, 23 species from 13 genera were collected and identified. Pleurophorus variolosus (KOLEN.) is a new record for the fauna of Iran. KEY WORDS: Coleoptera, Scarabaeoidea, Glaphyridae, Geotrupidae, Scarabaeidae, Northern Iran, Mazandaran prov. Introduction The superfamily Scarabaeoidea comprises more than 35.000 species worldwide (RATCLIFFE & PAULSEN 2008). The superfamily Scarabaeoidea includes the family Scarabaeidae – "scarab beetles," the Lucanidae – "stag beetles," Passalidae – "bess beetles," and several of the traditional subfamilies of Scarabaeidae that are now generally treated as separate families (RILEY & WOLFE 2003). Perhaps the most well-known features of adult scarabaeoids are their 3-7-segmented, fan-like or lamellate antennal club and powerful legs armed with teeth on the outer edge, an adaptation for digging (BORROR et al. 1989). Scarabaeoids feed on most 32 M. BUNALSKI, N. SAMIN, H. GHAHARI types of dung and a wide range of plant and animal matter, from detritus through lower plants to virtually all higher plant tissues, and from carrion to predation on other insects.
    [Show full text]
  • Testing the Effect of Pharmaceutical Residues on the Cattle Dung Ecosystem
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2011 Testing the effect of pharmaceutical residues on the cattle dung ecosystem Jochmann, Ralf Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-60965 Dissertation Originally published at: Jochmann, Ralf. Testing the effect of pharmaceutical residues on the cattle dung ecosystem. 2011, University of Zurich, Faculty of Science. Testing the Effect of Pharmaceutical Residues on the Cattle Dung Ecosystem Dissertation zur Erlangung der naturwissenschaftlichen Doktorwürde (Dr. sc. nat.) vorgelegt der Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität Zürich von Ralf Jochmann aus Deutschland Promotionskomitee: Prof. Dr. Wolf Blanckenhorn Prof. Dr. Heinz-Ulrich Reyer Thomas Walter Zürich 2011 Contents General Introduction 1 Chapter 1 13 How to test non-target effects of veterinary pharmaceutical residues in livestock dung in the field (Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 7, 287–296, 2010) Chapter 2 41 Lethal and sublethal toxic effects of a test chemical (ivermectin) on the yellow dung fly Scathophaga stercoraria based on a standardized international ring test (Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 28, 2117–2124, 2009) Chapter 3 60 Assessing the effect of pharmaceutical residues on biodiversity at the landscape level Chapter 4 81 Ivermectin unequally affects trophic groups of the dung community Chapter 5 97 A field test of the effect of varying ivermectin concentrations on the biodiversity of cattle dung insects Summary/Zusammenfassung 109 GENERAL INTRODUCTION 1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION Vertebrate dung is a resource for many different species. Bacteria, fungi, nematodes, earthworms, mites and insects live in this ephemeral habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Diversity and Relative Abundance of Scarab Beetle Fauna
    Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2017; 5(1): 711-716 E-ISSN: 2320-7078 P-ISSN: 2349-6800 Species diversity and relative abundance of scarab JEZS 2017; 5(1): 711-716 © 2017 JEZS beetle fauna in Assam, northeast India Received: 07-11-2016 Accepted: 08-12-2016 Badal Bhattacharyya Badal Bhattacharyya, Gautam Handique, D Pujari, S Bhagawati, All India Network Project on H Mishra, D Gogoi and H Debnath Soil Arthropod Pests, Department of Entomology, Assam Agricultural University, Abstract Jorhat, Assam, India Species diversity and abundance of scarab beetles was studied from Assam, northeast India from 2007- 2013. A total of 44 species of scarabs under 6 sub families and 21 genera were identified, out of which 41 Gautam Handique species are new records. Majority of the phytophagous species belonged to the subfamily Melolonthinae Ex-Senior Research Fellow, All and Rutelinae while the coprophagous species belonged to Dynastinae and Cetoniinae. Species profiling India Network Project on Soil revealed that Apogonia ferruginea was the most predominant species and contributed 17.60 per cent out Arthropod Pests, Department of of the total number of beetles followed by Anomala chlorosoma (14.56%), Adoretus spp. (12.75%), Entomology, Assam Agricultural Apogonia area (10.94%) and Sophrops irridipennis (10.63%) with peak population in the month of July University, Jorhat, Assam, India (419.14). Multiple regression analysis with weather parameters revealed that beetle population was influenced by combined effects of maximum temperature, total rainfall and wind speed in all years with D Pujari maximum variation in 2007 (78.66%) and minimum in 2012 (59.56%).
    [Show full text]