DOCSLIB.ORG

PR Or Progress? Glencore's Corporate Responsibility in the Democratic

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PR Or Progress? Glencore's Corporate Responsibility in the Democratic PR or Progress? Glencore’s Corporate Responsibility in the Democratic Republic of the Congo June 2014 Authors Chantal Peyer, Patricia Feeney, François Mercier PR or Progress? Glencore’s Corporate Responsibility in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. June 2014. Impressum Authors: Chantal Peyer, Patricia Feeney, François Mercier Report written in collaboration with our Congolese partners: Action against impunity for human rights (ACIDH), AFREWATCH and the Episcopal Commission on Natural Resources (CERN). We would also like to express our thanks to Emmanuel UMPULA, Jean-Pierre OKENDA, Prof. Célestin BANZA and Carolyn NORRIS for their invaluable contribution. Layout: Andrea Müller Bread for All, Fastenopfer and RAID, June 2014 RAID RAID is a non-governmental, not-for-profit organisation promoting responsible conduct and respect for human rights by companies abroad. RAID works closely with affected communities, helping vic- tims of corporate human rights abuse to seek justice through complaints mechanisms and legal ac- tion. Through research, education and international advocacy, RAID raises awareness on human rights issues among governments, corporations and the public. Contact: RAID, 1 Bladon Close, Oxford, OX2 8AD, United Kingdom Phone: +44 1865 436 245. E-mail: [email protected]. Internet: www.raid-uk.org Bread for All Bread for All is the development organisation of the Swiss Protestant Churches. We support commu- nities in their struggle to live in freedom from exploitation and injustice. Together with our partners we fund over 350 projects in the countries of the South (Latin America, Africa and Asia) which foster sustainability, self-sufficiency and independence. In Switzerland, we speak about development poli- cy, the need for an ethical economy and promote respect for the right to food. Main office: Bread for All, Bürenstrasse 12, P. O. Box 1015, CH-3007 Bern Phone: +41 31 380 65 65. E-mail: [email protected]. Internet: www.brotfueralle.ch Regional office: Av. du Grammont 9, CH-1007 Lausanne Phone + 41 21 614 77 17. E-mail [email protected]. Internet: www.ppp.ch Fastenopfer Fastenopfer, the Catholic Lenten Fund, is the Swiss Catholic relief agency. We work in the North and in the South to promote a fairer world. We call for a sharing of resources so that everyone can enjoy a life of dignity. Fastenopfer supports 400 projects in Africa, Latin America and Asia, and, with our partners, we are committed to fighting poverty and defending human rights – irrespective of origin, religion or political affiliation. Main office: Fastenopfer, Alpenquai 4, Postfach 2856, CH-6002 Lucerne Phone: +41 41 227 59 59. E-mail: [email protected]. Internet: www.fastenopfer.ch Regional office: Av. du Grammont 7, CH-1007 Lausanne Phone +41 21 617 88 81. E-mail: [email protected]. Internet: www.actiondecareme.ch 2 PR or Progress? Glencore’s Corporate Responsibility in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. June 2014. Table of contents A. Executive summary .....................................................................................................7 A.1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 7 A.2. Glencore’s corporate social responsibility: improved policies ................................................. 8 A.3. Environmental issues ................................................................................................................ 8 A.4. Security and Human Rights: New Policies, Old Problems ...................................................... 10 A.5. Glencore and the communities .............................................................................................. 12 A.6. Taxation – Substantial profit transfers to tax havens ............................................................ 13 B. Preliminary remarks: methodology used to investigate Glencore’s operations in the DRC ........................................................................................................................... 15 1. Introduction to Glencore ........................................................................................... 18 1.1. From Glencore to Glencore Xstrata to… Glencore .............................................................. 18 1.2. CEO Remuneration: US$ 182 million tax free ..................................................................... 18 1.3. Scandals: Glencore’s charm offensive ................................................................................. 19 1.4. The Democratic Republic of Congo: a geological scandal ................................................... 20 1.5. The DRC is responsible for four-fifths of the cobalt produced by Glencore ....................... 22 1.6. Guaranteed rights for another ten years ............................................................................ 23 2. Glencore’s approach to corporate responsibility: What has changed? ........................ 24 2.1. Rudimentary Beginnings ..................................................................................................... 24 2.2. Post-Merger Catch-Up ......................................................................................................... 25 2.3. Performance Targets and Problem Areas ........................................................................... 25 3. Environment ............................................................................................................. 27 3.1. Management of mining effluent: pollution of water courses and broken promises .......... 27 3.1.1. Water in Katanga .................................................................................................... 27 3.1.2. KCC and water pollution in Kolwezi: the situation in April 2012 ............................ 28 3.1.3. KCC and water pollution in Kolwezi: the situation in October 2013 ...................... 29 3.1.4. KCC and water pollution in Kolwezi: the situation in Januar-March 2014 ............. 33 3.1.5. Glencore’s response ............................................................................................... 34 3.1.6. Contamination of water courses by copper, cobalt and arsenic – consequences for the population .................................................................................................. 35 3.1.7. Glencore and pollution of water courses – some concluding remarks .................. 36 3.2. MUMI: a concession in a game reserve .............................................................................. 37 3.2.1. Game reserves in the DRC ...................................................................................... 37 3.2.2. MUMI: a concession in a game reserve ................................................................. 38 3.2.3. Glencore’s response ............................................................................................... 40 3.2.4. MUMI: a policy based on fait accompli rather than dialogue to clarify the situation ................................................................................................................................ 41 3.2.5. The lack of special mitigation measures in the reserve ......................................... 43 3.2.6. Pollution in the reserve? ........................................................................................ 45 4. Security and Human Rights ........................................................................................ 47 4.1. Human Rights and Security: international standards and company policy in the DRC context ................................................................................................................................. 47 4.1.1. International recognition of the responsibility of companies to respect human rights ....................................................................................................................... 47 4.1.2. Glencore ’s policy on human rights ........................................................................ 48 4.1.3. Code of Conduct for Private Security Providers ..................................................... 48 4.1.4. Human rights, security and realities at the local level ........................................... 49 3 PR or Progress? Glencore’s Corporate Responsibility in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. June 2014. 4.2. Violent deaths on KCC concessions and the ongoing conflict with artisanal miners .......... 51 4.2.1. The death of Kalala Mbenga ................................................................................... 51 4.2.2. The death of Eric Mutombo Kasuyi ........................................................................ 53 4.3. Use of excessive force by mine police guarding KCC’s concession ..................................... 59 4.3.1. Public Security and Glencore’s responsibility ......................................................... 61 4.4. Arbitrary Arrests .................................................................................................................. 62 4.5. Detention of Minors ............................................................................................................ 62 4.6. Freedom of movement........................................................................................................ 64 4.7. Mutanda Mining .................................................................................................................. 65 4.8. Tilwezembe – continuing human rights abuses .................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Mineral Industry of Congo (Kinshasa) in 2011
    2011 Minerals Yearbook CONGO (KINSHASA) U.S. Department of the Interior September 2013 U.S. Geological Survey THE MINERAL INDUSTRY OF CONGO (KINSHASA) By Thomas R. Yager The Democratic Republic of the Congo [Congo (Kinshasa)] In September 2010, the Government suspended mining in played a globally significant role in the world’s production the eastern Provinces of Maniema, Nord-Kivu, and Sud-Kivu, of cobalt, copper, diamond, tantalum, and tin. In 2011, the which accounted for most domestic niobium, tantalum, tin, country’s share of the world’s cobalt production amounted to and tungsten production. The Government imposed the ban in 53%; industrial diamond, 34%; tantalum, 13%; gem-quality an attempt to remove military and rebel groups from the local diamond, 7%; copper, 3%; and tin, 2%. Congo (Kinshasa) mineral trade. In March 2011, the Government lifted the ban accounted for about 45% of the world’s cobalt reserves. Crude (De Koning, 2011, p. 31). petroleum production also played a significant role in the In July 2010, the U.S. Congress passed the Dodd-Frank domestic economy. The country was not a globally significant Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which consumer of minerals or mineral fuels (Carlin, 2012; Edelstein, contains provisions concerning the use of minerals to 2012; Olson, 2012a, b; Papp, 2012; Shedd, 2012). finance military operations in eastern Congo (Kinshasa). All companies registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Minerals in the National Economy Commission (SEC) that sell products containing cassiterite, columbite-tantalite, gold, or wolframite were required to The mining and mineral processing sector accounted for disclose whether these minerals originated from Congo an estimated 15.5% of the gross domestic product in 2010 (Kinshasa) or adjoining countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Glencore's Corporate Responsibility in the Democratic Republic of The
    PR or Progress? Glencore’s Corporate Responsibility in the Democratic Republic of the Congo June 2014 Authors Chantal Peyer, Patricia Feeney, François Mercier PR or Progress? Glencore’s Corporate Responsibility in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. June 2014. Impressum Authors: Chantal Peyer, Patricia Feeney, François Mercier Report written in collaboration with our Congolese partners: Action against impunity for human rights (ACIDH), AFREWATCH and the Episcopal Commission on Natural Resources (CERN). We would also like to express our thanks to Emmanuel UMPULA, Jean-Pierre OKENDA, Prof. Célestin BANZA and Carolyn NORRIS for their invaluable contribution. Layout: Andrea Müller Bread for All, Fastenopfer and RAID, June 2014 RAID RAID is a non-governmental, not-for-profit organisation promoting responsible conduct and respect for human rights by companies abroad. RAID works closely with affected communities, helping vic- tims of corporate human rights abuse to seek justice through complaints mechanisms and legal ac- tion. Through research, education and international advocacy, RAID raises awareness on human rights issues among governments, corporations and the public. Contact: RAID, 1 Bladon Close, Oxford, OX2 8AD, United Kingdom Phone: +44 1865 436 245. E-mail: [email protected]. Internet: www.raid-uk.org Bread for All Bread for All is the development organisation of the Swiss Protestant Churches. We support commu- nities in their struggle to live in freedom from exploitation and injustice. Together with our partners we fund over 350 projects in the countries of the South (Latin America, Africa and Asia) which foster sustainability, self-sufficiency and independence. In Switzerland, we speak about development poli- cy, the need for an ethical economy and promote respect for the right to food.
    [Show full text]
  • Cobalt Blues.Pdf
    Cobalt blues Environmental pollution and human rights violations in Katanga’s copper and cobalt mines Fleur Scheele & Esther de Haan & Vincent Kiezebrink April 2016 Powered by Colophon Cobalt blues Environmental pollution and human rights violations in Katanga’s copper and cobalt mines April 2016 Author: Fleur Scheele in collaboration with Emmanuel Umpula Nkumba (Afrewatch), Donat Ben-Bellah (ACIDH) and Christian Bwenda (Premicongo) Co-authors: Esther de Haan en Vincent Kiezebrink Layout: Frans Schupp Photo’s report: Fleur Scheele ISBN: 978-94-6207-094-3 Powered by This publication is made possible with This publication has been produced financial assistance from the Dutch Ministry with funding of the European Union. of Foreign Affairs and by Friends of the The content of this publication is the Earth Netherlands (Milieudefensie). sole responsibility of SOMO and can The content of this publication is the sole in no way be taken to reflect the views responsibility of SOMO. All views expressed of the European Union. remain solely SOMO’s responsibility and in no way reflect the views of the donor. Stichting Onderzoek Multinationale Ondernemingen Centre for Research on Multinational Corporations Sarphatistraat 30, 1018 GL Amsterdam, The Netherlands T: +31 (0)20 639 12 91 – F: +31 (0)20 639 13 21 [email protected] – www.somo.nl The Centre for Research on Multinational Corporations (SOMO) is an independent, not-for-profit research and network organisation working on social, ecological and economic issues related to sustainable development. Since 1973, the organisation investigates multinational corporations and the consequences of their activities for people and the environment around the world.
    [Show full text]