2-Switch Transition on Unicyclic Graphs and Pseudoforest

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2-Switch Transition on Unicyclic Graphs and Pseudoforest 2-switch transition on unicyclic graphs and pseudoforest Daniel A. Jaumea,∗, Adr´ıan Pastinea, Victor N. Schv¨ollnera a Departamento de Matem´aticas, Facultad de Ciencias F´ısico-Matem´aticas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de San Luis, Instituto de Matem´atica Aplicada San Luis (UNSL-CONICET), Universidad Nacional de San Luis, San Luis, Rep´ublica Argentina. Abstract In the present work we prove that given any two unicycle graphs (pseud- oforests) that share the same degree sequence there is a finite sequence of 2-switches transforming one into the other such that all the graphs in the sequence are also unicyclic graphs (pseudoforests). Keywords: 2-switch, degree sequence, unicyclic graphs, pseudoforests, stability, Berge family. 2000 MSC: 05A15, 05A19. 1. Introduction Every graph G = (V, E) in the present article is finite, simple, undirected and labeled. We use |G| and kGk to denote the order of G and the size of G respectively. In this work the set of vertices of G is always a subset of [n] := {1,...,n}, for some n. When there may be ambiguity we use V (G) and E(G) to denote the vertex set and the edge set of G, otherwise we just use V and E. Vertex adjacency is denoted by x ∼ y, and we denote the edge {x,y} by xy (i.e., we say that xy ∈ E). The number of connected components of a graph G is denoted by κ(G) and its set of components by K(G). The subgraph of G obtained by deleting vertex v is denoted by G−v. Similarly, G − e is the subgraph of G obtained by deleting edge e, G + e or arXiv:2103.00618v1 [math.CO] 28 Feb 2021 G+ab is the graph obtained by adding an edge to G. If W is a set of vertices (edges) of a graph G, G − W denotes the subgraph obtained by deleting the vertices (edges) in W . The degree sequence of a graph G with vertex set V (G) = [n] is the sequence s(G) = (d1,...,dn), where di is the degree of vertex i. We assume ∗ Corresponding author: Daniel A. Jaume Email addresses: [email protected] (Daniel A. Jaume), [email protected] (Adr´ıan Pastine), [email protected] (Victor N. Schv¨ollner) Preprint submitted to Elsevier Received: date / Accepted: date that d1 ≥ d2 ≥···≥ dn. A sequence s = (d1,...,dn) is graphical if there is a graph such that s is its degree sequence. Let s = (d1,...,dn) be a graphical sequence. By U(s) we denote the set of all the unicyclic graphs (connected graphs with just one cycle) with degree sequence s, and by P(s) we denote the set of all the pseudoforests (graphs whose connected components are trees or unicyclic graphs) with degree sequence s. The name pseudoforest is justified by analogy to the more commonly studied trees and forests. In [4] the authors attribute the study of pseud- oforests to Dantzig’s 1963 book on linear programming, see [3], in which pseudoforests arise in the solution of certain network flow problems. Pseud- oforests also form graph-theoretic models of functions and occur in several algorithmic problems. Pseudoforests are sparse graphs (their number of edges is linearly bounded in terms of their number of vertices, in fact, they have at most as many edges as they have vertices) and their matroid struc- ture allows several other families of sparse graphs to be decomposed as unions of forests and pseudoforests. The name “pseudoforest” was first used in [12]. One of the most studied problems in the literature is: given a graph parameter (clique number, domination number, matching number, etc.), finding the minimum and maximum values for the parameter in a family of graphs, see [2, 6, 7, 11]. Another interesting problem is deciding which values between the minimum and the maximum can be realized by a graph in the family, see [9, 10, 8]. Let G be a graph containing four distinct vertices a, b, c, d such that ab, cd ∈ E and ac, bd∈ / E. The process of deleting the edges ab and cd from G and adding ac and bd to G is referred to as a 2-switch in G, this is a classical operation, see [1]. Even though the order of the vertices matters, it is usual to talk about a 2-switch between the edges {a, b} and {c, d}. If G′ is the graph obtained from G by a 2-switch, it is straightforward to check that G and G′ have the same degree sequence. In other words, this operation preserves the degree sequence. In [8] the 2-switch was introduced as a function. Definition 1.1. ([8]) Let a, b, c, d ∈ [n] and let G be a graph. The ma- a b trix c d is said to be interchangeable in G, if it satisfies the following conditions: 1. ab, cd ∈ E(G); 2. {a, b} ∩ {c, d} = ∅; 3. ac, bd 6∈ E(G). a b Otherwise, c d is said to be trivial for G. 2 Notice in particular that if at least one of a, b, c, d is not a vertex of G, a b then c d is trivial for G. a b Definition 1.2. ([8]) Let n be a integer and a, b, c, d ∈ [n], A = c d and G a graph. A 2-switch is a function τA : G → G, where G is the set of all graphs, defined as follows: G − ab − cd + ac + bd, if A is interchangeable in G, τA(G)= (1) G, if A is trivial for G. If τA(G)= G, we say that τA is trivial for G. The matrix A is said to be an action matrix of τA. An important fact about degree sequences is that, given two graphs with the same degree sequence, one can be obtained from the other by applying successive 2-switches. Theorem 1.3. If G, H ∈ G(s), there exists a 2-switch sequence transforming G into H. Theorem 1.3 appears throughout the literature, although its earliest ref- erence appears most likely in [1]. In [2] the authors study the matching number of trees with a given degree sequence. The authors find minimum and maximum values for the matching number in this family, and then show that every value between the minimum and the maximum is realized by a graph in the family. When this happens for a parameter, it is said to have interval property with respect to the family of graphs being studied. A family of graphs is said to be a Berge family, if for all pair of graphs of the family, there exist a finite sequence of 2-switch that transform one into the other, such that every intermediate graph is a member of the family. In [8] it was proved that trees and forests with the same degree sequence are Berge families, they also introduce two special types of 2-switch. A nontrivial 2-switch τ over a tree T is said to be a t-switch if τ(T ) is a tree. A nontrivial 2-switch τ over a forest F is said to be an f-switch if τ(F ) is a forest. They also proved the following theorem that shows that trees and forests with the same degree sequence are Berge families. Theorem 1.4 (Forest Transition Theorem, [8]). Let F and F ′ be two forests (trees) with the same degree sequence. Then F can be transformed into F ′ by a finite sequence of f-switches (t-switches). A graph parameter ξ is said to be stable under 2-switch, see definition 5.1 in [8], if given G a graph and τ a 2-switch, then |ξ (τ(G)) − ξ(G)|≤ 1. 3 Theorem 1.5 ([8]). The following parameters are stable under 2-switch: 1. matching number, 2. independence number, 3. domination number, 4. path-covering number, 5. edge-covering number, 6. vertex-covering number, 7. chromatic number, 8. clique number, 9. number of connected components. Note that any stable discrete graph parameter has the interval property with respect to every Berge family. 2. u-switch In this section we introduce and characterize a particular type of 2- switch, the u-switch, which is closed over unicyclic graphs. We start with some technical results. A graph G is said to be unicyclic if it is connected and contains exactly one cycle, i.e. kGk = |G|. If s is a graphical sequence, we denote by U(s) the set of all unicyclic graphs with degree sequence s. We assume that s is the degree sequence of at least one unicyclic graph. A 2-switch τ is said to be a breaker over a graph G whenever κ(τ(G)) > κ(G). If C is a cycle graph, and τ is a breaker over C, then τ(C) is the union of two disjoint cycles. If τ is not a breaker over C, then τ(C) is a cycle isomorphic to C. a b The following observation will be used many times. Let τ = c d be a 2-switch and e an edge of G, e∈ / {ab, cd}. If e∈ / τ(G−e), then τ(G−e)+ e = τ(G). In particular, if τ(G − e) is a tree, then τ(G) is unicyclic. We define two edge-disjoint subgraphs of a graph G: Cycles(G) and Forest(G). By Cycles(G) we denote the subgraph induced by all the ver- tices of G such that they are in a cycle of G.
Recommended publications
  • Graph Varieties Axiomatized by Semimedial, Medial, and Some Other Groupoid Identities
    Discussiones Mathematicae General Algebra and Applications 40 (2020) 143–157 doi:10.7151/dmgaa.1344 GRAPH VARIETIES AXIOMATIZED BY SEMIMEDIAL, MEDIAL, AND SOME OTHER GROUPOID IDENTITIES Erkko Lehtonen Technische Universit¨at Dresden Institut f¨ur Algebra 01062 Dresden, Germany e-mail: [email protected] and Chaowat Manyuen Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science Khon Kaen University Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand e-mail: [email protected] Abstract Directed graphs without multiple edges can be represented as algebras of type (2, 0), so-called graph algebras. A graph is said to satisfy an identity if the corresponding graph algebra does, and the set of all graphs satisfying a set of identities is called a graph variety. We describe the graph varieties axiomatized by certain groupoid identities (medial, semimedial, autodis- tributive, commutative, idempotent, unipotent, zeropotent, alternative). Keywords: graph algebra, groupoid, identities, semimediality, mediality. 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification: 05C25, 03C05. 1. Introduction Graph algebras were introduced by Shallon [10] in 1979 with the purpose of providing examples of nonfinitely based finite algebras. Let us briefly recall this concept. Given a directed graph G = (V, E) without multiple edges, the graph algebra associated with G is the algebra A(G) = (V ∪ {∞}, ◦, ∞) of type (2, 0), 144 E. Lehtonen and C. Manyuen where ∞ is an element not belonging to V and the binary operation ◦ is defined by the rule u, if (u, v) ∈ E, u ◦ v := (∞, otherwise, for all u, v ∈ V ∪ {∞}. We will denote the product u ◦ v simply by juxtaposition uv. Using this representation, we may view any algebraic property of a graph algebra as a property of the graph with which it is associated.
    [Show full text]
  • Networkx: Network Analysis with Python
    NetworkX: Network Analysis with Python Salvatore Scellato Full tutorial presented at the XXX SunBelt Conference “NetworkX introduction: Hacking social networks using the Python programming language” by Aric Hagberg & Drew Conway Outline 1. Introduction to NetworkX 2. Getting started with Python and NetworkX 3. Basic network analysis 4. Writing your own code 5. You are ready for your project! 1. Introduction to NetworkX. Introduction to NetworkX - network analysis Vast amounts of network data are being generated and collected • Sociology: web pages, mobile phones, social networks • Technology: Internet routers, vehicular flows, power grids How can we analyze this networks? Introduction to NetworkX - Python awesomeness Introduction to NetworkX “Python package for the creation, manipulation and study of the structure, dynamics and functions of complex networks.” • Data structures for representing many types of networks, or graphs • Nodes can be any (hashable) Python object, edges can contain arbitrary data • Flexibility ideal for representing networks found in many different fields • Easy to install on multiple platforms • Online up-to-date documentation • First public release in April 2005 Introduction to NetworkX - design requirements • Tool to study the structure and dynamics of social, biological, and infrastructure networks • Ease-of-use and rapid development in a collaborative, multidisciplinary environment • Easy to learn, easy to teach • Open-source tool base that can easily grow in a multidisciplinary environment with non-expert users
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Hamiltonian Path
    6.S078 Fine-Grained Algorithms and Complexity MIT Lecture 17: Algorithms for Finding Long Paths (Part 1) November 2, 2020 In this lecture and the next, we will introduce a number of algorithmic techniques used in exponential-time and FPT algorithms, through the lens of one parametric problem: Definition 0.1 (k-Path) Given a directed graph G = (V; E) and parameter k, is there a simple path1 in G of length ≥ k? Already for this simple-to-state problem, there are quite a few radically different approaches to solving it faster; we will show you some of them. We’ll see algorithms for the case of k = n (Hamiltonian Path) and then we’ll turn to “parameterizing” these algorithms so they work for all k. A number of papers in bioinformatics have used quick algorithms for k-Path and related problems to analyze various networks that arise in biology (some references are [SIKS05, ADH+08, YLRS+09]). In the following, we always denote the number of vertices jV j in our given graph G = (V; E) by n, and the number of edges jEj by m. We often associate the set of vertices V with the set [n] := f1; : : : ; ng. 1 Hamiltonian Path Before discussing k-Path, it will be useful to first discuss algorithms for the famous NP-complete Hamiltonian path problem, which is the special case where k = n. Essentially all algorithms we discuss here can be adapted to obtain algorithms for k-Path! The naive algorithm for Hamiltonian Path takes time about n! = 2Θ(n log n) to try all possible permutations of the nodes (which can also be adapted to get an O?(k!)-time algorithm for k-Path, as we’ll see).
    [Show full text]
  • Network Analysis of the Multimodal Freight Transportation System in New York City
    Network Analysis of the Multimodal Freight Transportation System in New York City Project Number: 15 – 2.1b Year: 2015 FINAL REPORT June 2018 Principal Investigator Qian Wang Researcher Shuai Tang MetroFreight Center of Excellence University at Buffalo Buffalo, NY 14260-4300 Network Analysis of the Multimodal Freight Transportation System in New York City ABSTRACT The research is aimed at examining the multimodal freight transportation network in the New York metropolitan region to identify critical links, nodes and terminals that affect last-mile deliveries. Two types of analysis were conducted to gain a big picture of the region’s freight transportation network. First, three categories of network measures were generated for the highway network that carries the majority of last-mile deliveries. They are the descriptive measures that demonstrate the basic characteristics of the highway network, the network structure measures that quantify the connectivity of nodes and links, and the accessibility indices that measure the ease to access freight demand, services and activities. Second, 71 multimodal freight terminals were selected and evaluated in terms of their accessibility to major multimodal freight demand generators such as warehousing establishments. As found, the most important highways nodes that are critical in terms of connectivity and accessibility are those in and around Manhattan, particularly the bridges and tunnels connecting Manhattan to neighboring areas. Major multimodal freight demand generators, such as warehousing establishments, have better accessibility to railroad and marine port terminals than air and truck terminals in general. The network measures and findings in the research can be used to understand the inventory of the freight network in the system and to conduct freight travel demand forecasting analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Matroid Theory
    MATROID THEORY HAYLEY HILLMAN 1 2 HAYLEY HILLMAN Contents 1. Introduction to Matroids 3 1.1. Basic Graph Theory 3 1.2. Basic Linear Algebra 4 2. Bases 5 2.1. An Example in Linear Algebra 6 2.2. An Example in Graph Theory 6 3. Rank Function 8 3.1. The Rank Function in Graph Theory 9 3.2. The Rank Function in Linear Algebra 11 4. Independent Sets 14 4.1. Independent Sets in Graph Theory 14 4.2. Independent Sets in Linear Algebra 17 5. Cycles 21 5.1. Cycles in Graph Theory 22 5.2. Cycles in Linear Algebra 24 6. Vertex-Edge Incidence Matrix 25 References 27 MATROID THEORY 3 1. Introduction to Matroids A matroid is a structure that generalizes the properties of indepen- dence. Relevant applications are found in graph theory and linear algebra. There are several ways to define a matroid, each relate to the concept of independence. This paper will focus on the the definitions of a matroid in terms of bases, the rank function, independent sets and cycles. Throughout this paper, we observe how both graphs and matrices can be viewed as matroids. Then we translate graph theory to linear algebra, and vice versa, using the language of matroids to facilitate our discussion. Many proofs for the properties of each definition of a matroid have been omitted from this paper, but you may find complete proofs in Oxley[2], Whitney[3], and Wilson[4]. The four definitions of a matroid introduced in this paper are equiv- alent to each other.
    [Show full text]
  • Networkx Reference Release 1.9.1
    NetworkX Reference Release 1.9.1 Aric Hagberg, Dan Schult, Pieter Swart September 20, 2014 CONTENTS 1 Overview 1 1.1 Who uses NetworkX?..........................................1 1.2 Goals...................................................1 1.3 The Python programming language...................................1 1.4 Free software...............................................2 1.5 History..................................................2 2 Introduction 3 2.1 NetworkX Basics.............................................3 2.2 Nodes and Edges.............................................4 3 Graph types 9 3.1 Which graph class should I use?.....................................9 3.2 Basic graph types.............................................9 4 Algorithms 127 4.1 Approximation.............................................. 127 4.2 Assortativity............................................... 132 4.3 Bipartite................................................. 141 4.4 Blockmodeling.............................................. 161 4.5 Boundary................................................. 162 4.6 Centrality................................................. 163 4.7 Chordal.................................................. 184 4.8 Clique.................................................. 187 4.9 Clustering................................................ 190 4.10 Communities............................................... 193 4.11 Components............................................... 194 4.12 Connectivity..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • K-Path Centrality: a New Centrality Measure in Social Networks
    Centrality Metrics in Social Network Analysis K-path: A New Centrality Metric Experiments Summary K-Path Centrality: A New Centrality Measure in Social Networks Adriana Iamnitchi University of South Florida joint work with Tharaka Alahakoon, Rahul Tripathi, Nicolas Kourtellis and Ramanuja Simha Adriana Iamnitchi K-Path Centrality: A New Centrality Measure in Social Networks 1 of 23 Centrality Metrics in Social Network Analysis Centrality Metrics Overview K-path: A New Centrality Metric Betweenness Centrality Experiments Applications Summary Computing Betweenness Centrality Centrality Metrics in Social Network Analysis Betweenness Centrality - how much a node controls the flow between any other two nodes Closeness Centrality - the extent a node is near all other nodes Degree Centrality - the number of ties to other nodes Eigenvector Centrality - the relative importance of a node Adriana Iamnitchi K-Path Centrality: A New Centrality Measure in Social Networks 2 of 23 Centrality Metrics in Social Network Analysis Centrality Metrics Overview K-path: A New Centrality Metric Betweenness Centrality Experiments Applications Summary Computing Betweenness Centrality Betweenness Centrality measures the extent to which a node lies on the shortest path between two other nodes betweennes CB (v) of a vertex v is the summation over all pairs of nodes of the fractional shortest paths going through v. Definition (Betweenness Centrality) For every vertex v 2 V of a weighted graph G(V ; E), the betweenness centrality CB (v) of v is defined by X X σst (v) CB
    [Show full text]
  • Matroids You Have Known
    26 MATHEMATICS MAGAZINE Matroids You Have Known DAVID L. NEEL Seattle University Seattle, Washington 98122 [email protected] NANCY ANN NEUDAUER Pacific University Forest Grove, Oregon 97116 nancy@pacificu.edu Anyone who has worked with matroids has come away with the conviction that matroids are one of the richest and most useful ideas of our day. —Gian Carlo Rota [10] Why matroids? Have you noticed hidden connections between seemingly unrelated mathematical ideas? Strange that finding roots of polynomials can tell us important things about how to solve certain ordinary differential equations, or that computing a determinant would have anything to do with finding solutions to a linear system of equations. But this is one of the charming features of mathematics—that disparate objects share similar traits. Properties like independence appear in many contexts. Do you find independence everywhere you look? In 1933, three Harvard Junior Fellows unified this recurring theme in mathematics by defining a new mathematical object that they dubbed matroid [4]. Matroids are everywhere, if only we knew how to look. What led those junior-fellows to matroids? The same thing that will lead us: Ma- troids arise from shared behaviors of vector spaces and graphs. We explore this natural motivation for the matroid through two examples and consider how properties of in- dependence surface. We first consider the two matroids arising from these examples, and later introduce three more that are probably less familiar. Delving deeper, we can find matroids in arrangements of hyperplanes, configurations of points, and geometric lattices, if your tastes run in that direction.
    [Show full text]
  • Strongly Connected Components and Biconnected Components
    Strongly Connected Components and Biconnected Components Daniel Wisdom 27 January 2017 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Figure 1: A directed graph. Credit: Crash Course Coding Companion. 1 Strongly Connected Components A strongly connected component (SCC) is a set of vertices where every vertex can reach every other vertex. In an undirected graph the SCCs are just the groups of connected vertices. We can find them using a simple DFS. This works because, in an undirected graph, u can reach v if and only if v can reach u. This is not true in a directed graph, which makes finding the SCCs harder. More on that later. 2 Kernel graph We can travel between any two nodes in the same strongly connected component. So what if we replaced each strongly connected component with a single node? This would give us what we call the kernel graph, which describes the edges between strongly connected components. Note that the kernel graph is a directed acyclic graph because any cycles would constitute an SCC, so the cycle would be compressed into a kernel. 3 1,2,5,6 4,7 8 Figure 2: Kernel graph of the above directed graph. 3 Tarjan's SCC Algorithm In a DFS traversal of the graph every SCC will be a subtree of the DFS tree. This subtree is not necessarily proper, meaning that it may be missing some branches which are their own SCCs. This means that if we can identify every node that is the root of its SCC in the DFS, we can enumerate all the SCCs.
    [Show full text]
  • Incremental Dynamic Construction of Layered Polytree Networks )
    440 Incremental Dynamic Construction of Layered Polytree Networks Keung-Chi N g Tod S. Levitt lET Inc., lET Inc., 14 Research Way, Suite 3 14 Research Way, Suite 3 E. Setauket, NY 11733 E. Setauket , NY 11733 [email protected] [email protected] Abstract Many exact probabilistic inference algorithms1 have been developed and refined. Among the earlier meth­ ods, the polytree algorithm (Kim and Pearl 1983, Certain classes of problems, including per­ Pearl 1986) can efficiently update singly connected ceptual data understanding, robotics, discov­ belief networks (or polytrees) , however, it does not ery, and learning, can be represented as incre­ work ( without modification) on multiply connected mental, dynamically constructed belief net­ networks. In a singly connected belief network, there is works. These automatically constructed net­ at most one path (in the undirected sense) between any works can be dynamically extended and mod­ pair of nodes; in a multiply connected belief network, ified as evidence of new individuals becomes on the other hand, there is at least one pair of nodes available. The main result of this paper is the that has more than one path between them. Despite incremental extension of the singly connect­ the fact that the general updating problem for mul­ ed polytree network in such a way that the tiply connected networks is NP-hard (Cooper 1990), network retains its singly connected polytree many propagation algorithms have been applied suc­ structure after the changes. The algorithm cessfully to multiply connected networks, especially on is deterministic and is guaranteed to have networks that are sparsely connected. These methods a complexity of single node addition that is include clustering (also known as node aggregation) at most of order proportional to the number (Chang and Fung 1989, Pearl 1988), node elimination of nodes (or size) of the network.
    [Show full text]
  • Analyzing Social Media Network for Students in Presidential Election 2019 with Nodexl
    ANALYZING SOCIAL MEDIA NETWORK FOR STUDENTS IN PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION 2019 WITH NODEXL Irwan Dwi Arianto Doctoral Candidate of Communication Sciences, Airlangga University Corresponding Authors: [email protected] Abstract. Twitter is widely used in digital political campaigns. Twitter as a social media that is useful for building networks and even connecting political participants with the community. Indonesia will get a demographic bonus starting next year until 2030. The number of productive ages that will become a demographic bonus if not recognized correctly can be a problem. The election organizer must seize this opportunity for the benefit of voter participation. This study aims to describe the network structure of students in the 2019 presidential election. The first debate was held on January 17, 2019 as a starting point for data retrieval on Twitter social media. This study uses data sources derived from Twitter talks from 17 January 2019 to 20 August 2019 with keywords “#pilpres2019 OR #mahasiswa since: 2019-01-17”. The data obtained were analyzed by the communication network analysis method using NodeXL software. Our Analysis found that Top Influencer is @jokowi, as well as Top, Mentioned also @jokowi while Top Tweeters @okezonenews and Top Replied-To @hasmi_bakhtiar. Jokowi is incumbent running for re-election with Ma’ruf Amin (Senior Muslim Cleric) as his running mate against Prabowo Subianto (a former general) and Sandiaga Uno as his running mate (former vice governor). This shows that the more concentrated in the millennial generation in this case students are presidential candidates @jokowi. @okezonenews, the official twitter account of okezone.com (MNC Media Group).
    [Show full text]
  • Maximum and Minimum Degree in Iterated Line Graphs by Manu
    Maximum and minimum degree in iterated line graphs by Manu Aggarwal A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Auburn, Alabama August 3, 2013 Keywords: iterated line graphs, maximum degree, minimum degree Approved by Dean Hoffman, Professor of Mathematics Chris Rodger, Professor of Mathematics Andras Bezdek, Professor of Mathematics Narendra Govil, Professor of Mathematics Abstract In this thesis we analyze two papers, both by Dr.Stephen G. Hartke and Dr.Aparna W. Higginson, on maximum [2] and minimum [3] degrees of a graph G under iterated line graph operations. Let ∆k and δk denote the minimum and the maximum degrees, respectively, of the kth iterated line graph Lk(G). It is shown that if G is not a path, then, there exist integers A and B such that for all k > A, ∆k+1 = 2∆k − 2 and for all k > B, δk+1 = 2δk − 2. ii Table of Contents Abstract . ii List of Figures . iv 1 Introduction . .1 2 An elementary result . .3 3 Maximum degree growth in iterated line graphs . 10 4 Minimum degree growth in iterated line graphs . 26 5 A puzzle . 45 Bibliography . 46 iii List of Figures 1.1 ............................................1 2.1 ............................................4 2.2 : Disappearing vertex of degree two . .5 2.3 : Disappearing leaf . .7 3.1 ............................................ 11 3.2 ............................................ 12 3.3 ............................................ 13 3.4 ............................................ 14 3.5 ............................................ 15 3.6 : When CD is not a single vertex . 17 3.7 : When CD is a single vertex . 18 4.1 ...........................................
    [Show full text]