Council Meeting Agenda Monday, June 26, 2017 at 7:00 p.m. Devon Municipal Office - Council Chambers 1 Columbia Avenue West, Devon, Alberta
1. Call to Order
2. Agenda Approval
3. Scheduled Public Hearing
4. Delegation/Presentations 4.1. Scheduled Delegation 4.1.1. Town Ambassador Recognition 4.2. Unscheduled Delegations
5. Adoption of Minutes 5.1. Regular Council Meeting – June 12, 2017 5.2. Business Arising from Minutes
6. Old Business 6.1. Axia #Fibertown Update 6.2. Riverbank Stabilization
7. Disposition of Delegations
8. New Business 8.1. 5306 Asset Management Policy 8.2. 893/2017 Parks, Recreation and Culture Board Bylaw 8.3. Website Upgrade
9. Correspondence Requiring a Decision
10. Other Correspondence
Page 1 of 2 1 11. Reports 11.1. Council Reports 11.2. Mayor and Council Calendar 11.3. Council Information Distribution List
12. Information Requests
13. Notice of Motions
14. Confidential Matters 14.1. Negotiation Matter
Page 2 of 2 2
Scheduled Delegation
Date June 21 2017 RFD Prepared Month Day Year
Town Ambassador Recognition
Proposal and Background
At the June 12, 2017 Council meeting Councillor Adams recommended recognizing the work and efforts put forth by Jenn Phillips on the regular social media posts for the Devon Days events and how well it was communicated and received by the community.
We thank Jenn Phillips for attending this evening.
Target Decision Date June 26th 2017 Council Meeting Date Month Day Year
Submitted By Melanie Crothers, Executive Assistant, Corporate and Legislative Services Name / Title
Reviewed By Tony Kulbisky, Chief Administrative Officer Name / Title
CAO Comments Support Recommended Action and a further policy/procedure will be brought forward for Council approval.
Scheduled Delegation Agenda Item 4.1.1 Page 1 of 1 3
Council Meeting Minutes June 12, 2017 – Council Chambers
Council Attendance Mayor Stephen Lindop (Absent) Councillor Michael Laveck Councillor, Tanya Hugh Deputy Mayor Councillor Stacey May Councillor Juston Porter Councillor Blake Adams Councillor Sandy Koroll
Administration Attendance Tony Kulbisky Chief Administrative Officer Melanie Crothers Executive Assistant, Corporate and Legislative Services Tom Koep Director, Community and Economic Development Paresh Dhariya Director, Planning and Infrastructure Andy Tchir Environmental and Sustainability Coordinator
1. Call to Order – 7:00 p.m.
2. Agenda Approval 160/2017 Moved By In Favour Opposed Carried Councillor Koroll Councillor Adams Councillor Laveck None opposed Councillor Hugh Councillor May Councillor Koroll Councillor Porter That Council approves the agenda as amended with the addition of the following: 14.2 Personnel Matter 14.3 Personnel Matter 14.4 Negotiation Matter
3. Scheduled Public Hearing
4. Delegations and Presentations
4.1 Scheduled Delegations
4.2 Unscheduled Delegations
June 12, 2017 Town of Devon - Council Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 6
4 5. Adoption of Minutes 5.1 May 23, 2017 Council Meeting Minutes
161/2017 Moved By In Favour Opposed Carried Councillor Koroll Councillor Adams Councillor Laveck None opposed. Councillor Hugh Councillor May Councillor Koroll Councillor Porter That Council approves the May 23, 2017 Council Meeting Minutes as amended with the motion to go into camera, resolution #156/2017, moved by Councillor Adams is added.
5.2 Business Arising from Minutes
6. Old Business 6.1 New Net Zero Town Office Building Updates Paresh Dhariya, Director of Planning and Infrastructure Dennis Cuku, 100th Monkey Conscious Consulting Vedran Skopac, Manasc Isaac 162/2017 Moved By In Favour Opposed Carried Councillor Adams Councillor Adams Councillor Laveck None opposed. Councillor Hugh Councillor May Councillor Koroll Councillor Porter That Council accepts the Director-Planning & Infrastructure report on the New Net Zero Town Office Building as information.
7. Disposition of Delegations
8. New Business 8.1 Environmental Sustainability Award Amendment Andy Tchir, Environmental and Sustainability Coordinator Paresh Dhariya, Director of Planning and Infrastructure 163/2017 Moved By In Favour Opposed Carried Councillor May Councillor Adams Councillor Laveck None opposed. Councillor Hugh Councillor May Councillor Koroll Councillor Porter That Council approves the amendments to the Environmental Sustainability Award for Business Policy 1606 as recommended and approves the transfer of $3,250 from the Green Reserve fund for the 2017 Environmental Sustainability Award for Business Policy 1606.
8.2 Canadian Association of Municipal Administrators Tony Kulbisky, Chief Administrative Officer 164/2017 Moved By In Favour Opposed Carried Councillor Koroll Councillor Adams Councillor Laveck None opposed. Councillor Hugh Councillor May Councillor Koroll Councillor Porter That Council accepts the Chief Administrative Officer briefing on the news release sent by the Canadian Association of Municipal Administrators as information.
June 12, 2017 Town of Devon - Council Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 6
5
9. Correspondence Requiring a Decision
10. Other Correspondence
11. Reports 11.1 Council Reports Councillor Laveck attended the Collaborate to compete May 31 and June1. Strong City, Strong region - The first Panel was Large City Mayor from Winnipeg, Edmonton, Calgary and Toronto. One example of how things cause problems is if a community builds a big mall and forgets to include the larger city around them. Most of the workers in an outlet mall is minimum wage and need public transport. Talked about working together regionally to compete globally; how there is need work with the municipals. How different things have worked and did not work. They talked about force allegation vs working to working to getting, trying to make regional serves work together. Regional approach to planning how the elements of regional planning asset in development; this plan talked how that a region can work to get on the world stage. Metro Region thinking globally talked about we can work on bring international companies to Canada. The CWWA conference - Day 0ne was strategic visioning of urban water management where Canada will be in the next 25 to 50 years? Had working groups where discussions about gaps and challenges in urban water management in Canada. The problem is policy doesn’t let change happen. If we have more electric cars on the roads and they do not use fuel then how do you pay for the roads? No tax results in more fight for the tax dollars on the infrastructure. There is Infrastructure Bank of Canada, the bank invests in infrastructure projects that have revenue-generating potential and are in the public interest. Climate change was a big part of the discussions. How climate change has caused more storm water to go through the waste water plants. Flushable are not flushable. Conference had about 120 people at it; was a great chance to talk to people who work in the minster offices and to those who talk to minsters on a weekly base. Met the FCM program advisor who helps with the decision making for the climate innovation program, the green fund, and municipal asset management program. Leduc Foundation - sad news Leduc Foundation is no more. From this time on it will be called Leduc Regional Housing Foundation. At our last meeting we worked on the 2018 – 2022 Strategic Business Planning Session. Attended Devon Days, had compliments on the hoodies, had the opportunity to take the helicopter tour. Also attended Parkland County River Day and visited with River Valley Alliance people. Councillor Porter attend the Federation of Canadian Municipalities conference in Ottawa, Moore Day farm tour, Moore Family constructed a community garden to include 4 season plants to sell locally, interesting to hear the processes and issues over years since inception. Also did a tour of the STO which is the public transit system, used old track lines and actually created bus corridors. Had an opportunity to tour the Parliament building with MP Mike Lake. Parliament building is closing for a number years to go under construction to bring it up to date (no Wi-Fi in the building). This past weekend took in Devon Days.
June 12, 2017 Town of Devon - Council Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 6
6 Councillor Adams attend the Federation of Canadian Municipalities conference in Ottawa, Moore Day farm tour, Moore Family farm had very passionate bee keeper and the different aspects and struggles the garden experienced. Great attraction in our jerseys, Council stands out. Parliament tour with MP Mike Lake got to go into the library and some of the original officers. Even though the retro fits are needed it will be sad to not have the historical feeling. Devon Days was a great success, the app worked great; social media was great keeping everyone in the know. New traffic signs and playground signs in the Ravines now. Councillor Koroll attended the Devon Soccer Timbits Tournament, the Emerald Awards, Sustainability Awards – Brian Hicks & Devon Tim Hortons were Finalists. Attended the Devon Days Senior Sok Hop, Devon Days Kick Off BBQ, CRB Meeting, Devon Days Parade, Fire Services Exemplary Service Awards in Red Deer. Congratulations to Deputy Chief Yez and Deputy Chief Babuik! and lastly participated in the Devon Days Parade.
Councillor May attend 2 meetings with VPIC to review the priorities identified by the community; we will have a beautiful Voyageur Park in the future to come. Attended the Collaborate to Compete pre-conference session in Ottawa where it was great to hear large cities willing to cooperate with smaller municipalities. Attended the Federation of Canadian Municipalities conference in Ottawa, Moore Day farm tour, where they offer tours, education sessions, etc. just to share the information. Participated in Devon Days the BBQ Kick Off, the root beer floats were great, parade was fantastic, the weather held out. This morning attended a Yellowhead Regional Library meeting, infrastructure funding released, the YRL received 1.3Mil for infrastructure repairs for the main building, will be working on best use of the dollars, improve the shipping loading docks, etc. Deputy Mayor Hugh unfortunately broken collarbone but feeling blessed at the support from the community, friends, coworkers and family. Attended the Seniors’ Week Sok Hop which was a great event, also managed to attend the Devon Days BBQ Kick Off. Attended the Edmonton Metropolitan Region Economic Development Entity (‘the entity’) where Greg Krischke as Chair, approved 2017 to 2019 budget, focused on jobs and diversification of the economic development. Attended what may be the last Capital Region Board meeting, passed motions regarding statutory plans, etc. brought annual report from CRB. Attended festivities for Devon Days - Fire Department pancake breakfast, parade, KUDOS to DEAX volunteers, etc. 11.2 Mayor and Council Calendars 11.3 Council Information Distribution List 11.4 Department Monthly Reports 11.4.1 Planning and Infrastructure 11.4.3 Community Economic Development 11.4.4 Corporate and Legislative Services 165/2017 Moved By In Favour Opposed Carried Councillor Laveck Councillor Adams Councillor Laveck None opposed. Councillor Hugh Councillor May Councillor Koroll Councillor Porter That Council accepts information items 11.1 through 11.4 for information.
June 12, 2017 Town of Devon - Council Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 6
7 12. Information Requests 12.1 Back Alley Details Councillor May requested Administration to bring back information on the back alleys within the community that need extensive work, detailed information on danger zones, medium to high priorities.
13. Notice of Motions
14. Confidential Matters 166/2017 Moved By In Favour Opposed Carried Councillor Adams Councillor Adams Councillor Laveck None opposed. Councillor Hugh Councillor May Councillor Koroll Councillor Porter That Council approves a motion to go in-camera to discuss Confidential Matters. Council Chambers closed to the public at 8:46 p.m. Break 8:46pm Return 8:54pm 167/2017 Moved By In Favour Opposed Carried Councillor Adams Councillor Adams Councillor Laveck None opposed. Councillor Hugh Councillor May Councillor Koroll Councillor Porter That Council approves a motion to go out of in-camera. Council Chambers opened to the public at 9:58 p.m.
14.1 Negotiation Matter Paresh Dhariya, Director of Planning and Infrastructure Tom Koep, Director of Community and Economic Development 168/2017 Moved By In Favour Opposed Carried Councillor Laveck Councillor Adams Councillor Laveck None opposed. Councillor Hugh Councillor May Councillor Koroll Councillor Porter That Council accepts the Director of Planning & Infrastructure report on the negation matter as information.
14.2 Personnel Matter Councillor Juston Porter 169/2017 Moved By In Favour Opposed Carried Councillor Porter Councillor Adams Councillor Laveck None opposed. Councillor Hugh Councillor May Councillor Koroll Councillor Porter That Council accepts the Personnel Matter report as information.
June 12, 2017 Town of Devon - Council Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 6
8 14.3 Personnel Matter Councillor Blake Adams 170/2017 Moved By In Favour Opposed Carried Councillor Adams Councillor Adams Councillor Laveck None opposed. Councillor Hugh Councillor May Councillor Koroll Councillor Porter That Council accepts the Personnel Matter as information.
14.4 Negotiation Matter Deputy Mayor Tanya Hugh 171/2017 Moved By In Favour Opposed Carried Councillor Koroll Councillor Adams Councillor Laveck None opposed. Councillor Hugh Councillor May Councillor Koroll Councillor Porter That Council accepts the Negotiation Matter as information.
15. Adjournment 172/2017 Moved By In Favour Opposed Carried Councillor Adams Councillor Adams Councillor Laveck None opposed. Councillor Hugh Councillor May Councillor Koroll Councillor Porter That Council adjourn the meeting. The meeting adjourned at 10:00 p.m.
Deputy Mayor Tanya Hugh Chief Administrative Officer Tony Kulbisky
June 12, 2017 Town of Devon - Council Meeting Minutes Page 6 of 6
9
Request for Decision
Date June 20 2017 RFD Prepared Month Day Year
Axia #FibreTown Update
Recommended Action That Council approves the Communication Coordinator’s community engagement plan in conjunction with Axia as recommended.
Proposal and Background Axia is a homegrown technology company and a world leader in fibre networks. Their goal is to bring high-speed fibre internet to rural and small urban communities across Alberta. At the Jan. 12, 2017 Committee of the Whole meeting, Council was given a presentation by Axia to begin the process of determining if Devon was interested in Axia installing their Fibre internet service in the town. At the following Jan. 23, 2017 Council meeting, Council directed Administration to work with Axia on a community engagement process to determine if the Town could support Axia reaching the 30 per cent interest they need to evaluate if Devon is a prime candidate for installing their services. There was a small delay on this project as all municipalities were notified by the AUMA that the Government of Alberta was conducting a RFP for the SuperNet services as the current agreement expires in 2018. Administration met further with Axia representative, John Reid to gain clarification on this process and what they needed from the Town to proceed on this project. Axia Business Model Step One: It starts with a partnership We are here It starts with a partnership and Axia needs to know what community leadership is on board and interested in them bringing fibre to the community. Step Two: Engaged Citizens We would like to be here Axia needs 30 per cent of residences (about 800) in Devon to express interest in their services at www.axia.com/alberta for them to build a business case to determine if Devon is a good fit for their services. Expressing interest for the service DOES NOT mean that residents are signing up for any future services from Axia.
Axia #FibreTown Update Agenda Item 6.1 Page 1 of 2 10
Step Three: Evaluation If Devon obtains 30 per cent interest from the community, Axia will survey the Town to look at roads, utility paths and all required permit they’d need to bring their service to Devon. Discussion on Benefits, Disadvantages and Options Benefits Axia is offering to provide a substantial investment in Devon through high-speed internet infrastructure at no monetary cost to the Town. Bringing Axia’s service to Devon can lower the cost our residents and businesses pay for their internet services. Providing an option for higher speed fibre internet will make Devon a more attractive community for prospective residents and business, while also giving our existing residents and businesses another option for service. Disadvantages Axia requires a commitment from the Town to support them in engaging the community. They would like to utilize the Town’s utility stuffers, social media and have Council or members of Administration champion their service through the community. Axia has also identified that they have the most success selling their services through door to door sales which is prohibited in the Town of Devon. Financial / Policy Considerations There is no financial impact to the Town. Axia requires support engaging the community at this time through Devon’s social media, utility mailouts and having a Councillor or prominent community member champion their services. Axia has identified that they have the most success when canvasing the neighborhood which is in conflict with Devon’s door to door sales bylaw. If Axia did obtain its 30 per cent interest, Council would need to determine if they can make an exception for Axia or if they would need to sign our residents up for their services in another way.
Target Decision Date June 26 2017 Council Meeting Date Month Day Year
Submitted By Justin Janke – Communications Coordinator Name / Title
Reviewed By Tony Kulbisky, CLGM – Chief Administrative Officer Name / Title
CAO Comments Support recommended action. Communications plan attached.
Attachments 1. 2017 Axia One Page Communications Plan
Axia #FibreTown Update Agenda Item 6.1 Page 2 of 2 11
Axia Community Engagement Communications Outline
Background • On Jan. 23, 2017, Axia expressed their interest in bringing their fibre internet service to the Town of Devon. • Council directed Administration to work with Axia on a community engagement process to determine the interest in the community. • On June 13, Justin, Tony and Darren had a follow up meeting with John Reid from Axia to get clarification on what they needed from the Town. We felt this was a low-risk, high-reward situation that could see Devon gain valuable infrastructure for high-speed internet in the future. • Axia requires 30 per cent (roughly 800) of residences in Devon to provide them support at their website: www.axia.com/alberta. • Residents and business that choose to express interest for Axia are NOT signing up for any sort of service if Axia reaches the 30 per cent they need. • If the Town reaches the 30 per cent support from the Devon community, Axia will proceed with a business case to determine if Devon is a right fit for their services. • We now need to know if Council is in support of having the Town assist Axia in engaging residents with the benefits of fibre internet.
Goal To have 30 per cent of Devon’s properties express their interest for Axia’s service through their website at www.axia.com/alberta.
Audiences & Stakeholders Stakeholders • Town of Devon property owners • Town of Devon residents • The Devon business community • Town of Devon community groups • Devon Chamber of Commerce • Devon Town Council • Town of Devon staff
Strategies • Print Materials o Axia will send a mail out to all Devon residents about the services they offer. o Axia is interested in knowing if the Town would allow them to use its utility mailouts to send a stuffer providing residents with info about their services. • Social Media Facebook and Twitter • Devon Chamber of Commerce Luncheon Presentation • Axia has offered to host open houses or present at various events (ie: Community Awareness Night). • Community Engagement
12
o Axia has had success when a Councillor or prominent community member champions bringing their services to a community.
Tactics & Timelines If supported, we would begin this summer (July/August).
Evaluation Success of the plan can be determined by the percentage of Devon households and businesses that express their interest for Axia’s services through Axia’s website.
13
Request for Decison
Date June 21st 2017 RFD Prepared Month Day Year
River Bank Stabilization Update
Recommended Action That Council supports the Lions Club Project to a maximum of up to $400,000 in a loan guarantee subject to the Lion’s Club providing Administration all necessary Provincial and Federal government approvals before commencing construction.
Proposal and Background In the spring of 2012 the Town had requested Tetra Tech EBA to review a section of riverbank along the Lions Park Campground. This was a joint project with the Parks Committee of the Devon Lion’s Club and the Town of Devon. The purpose of the review was to assess whether riverbank instability along the North Saskatchewan River may be negatively impacting the adjacent campground development. Different Options were discussed at that time and the Devon Lion’s Club and the Town directed a consultant to work on preferred option. The Town did apply and lobby extensively for funding support from Alberta Environment and although the project was deemed eligible, it did not rank as a priority to the Province and subsequently was not supported.
The Devon Lion’s Club did present another option to Administration in March/April 2017 which is different than the preferred option. No details or engineering plans were provided to Administration at that time. Administration met with Provincial agencies and the Province has advised us that they will need detailed engineering plans to receive approval from different government agencies. Devon Lion’s Club has completed a detailed environmental study on a new option and has advised Administration that they will get all necessary provincial and federal approvals.
Financial / Policy Considerations If Council is in support of above recommendation, Administration will bring back a financing option during the next regular Council meeting along with all required government approvals.
Target Decision Date June 26th 2017 Council Meeting Date Month Day Year
Submitted By Tony Kulbisky, CLGM – Chief Administrative Officer Paresh Dhariya, Director Planning and Information Name / Title
Reviewed By Tony Kulbisky, CLGM – Chief Administrative Officer Name / Title
CAO Comments Support the recommended action.
Attachments 1. Study and other related information from Lion’s Club Parks
River Bank Stabilization Update Agenda Item 6.2 Page 1 of 1 14 AK InC. Environmental Management Consultants
Via Email
May 76,2077
EnviroMak File Reference #17-18
Devon Lions Club Email: Daf e.McCormickl@telu
Attention: Dale McCormick
RE: Proposal for Environmental Assessment for Regulatory Approvals for Devon Lions CIub Campground Proposed Nofth Saskatchewan River Bank Stabilization in Devon, Albefta
!ntroduction Thank you for your request for proposal from EnviroMak lnc. Environmental Management Consultants for a cost estimate for environmental services to support proposed bank stabilization works on the North Saskatchewan River in Devon, Alberta. As per your request, we are providing information within the letter below and attachments which highlight the excellence and value in environmental services provided by our firm.
Decades of Experience - EnviroMak Corporate Profile EnviroMak lnc. Environmental Management Consultants provides a wide range of environmental services from desktop and field level assessments for aquatics/fish and fish ha bitat/water quality/limnologica l, wildlife/terrestrial/migratory birds/vegetation, endangered species to regulatory applications/approvals, construction monitoring, erosion and sedimentation control planning/monitoring, ECOPlan and Care of Water development to numerous other services. EnviroMak is a COR safety certified company and member of ComplyWorks and lsNetworld.
EDMONTON HEAD OFFICE ST. PAUL BRANCH OFFICE '101 - 18331 105 Avenue NW Box 486 Edmonton Alberta Canada T5S 2Kg St. Paul Alberta Canada T0A 3A0
Ma in Pho ne : 7 80-425-2461 Toll Free F ax: 877 -420-6462 Local F ax: 7 80425-2466 www.enviromak.com
15 The following are a short list of examples of relevant projects that EnviroMak has served and/or is serving as a team member or team lead on:
. Whitemud Creek Bank Stabilization in the City of Edmonton, Alberta (2OL7l
. Athabasca River Bank Stabilization Near Whitecourt, Alberta (2OL7) . North Saskatchewan River Bank Stabilization near Windermere Golf Course, Edmonton, Alberta (2015)
. Bow River Bank Protection and Stabilization in Refinery Park in Calgary, Alberta (2016)
. Hangingstone River Bank Stabilization Works near Fort McMurray, Alberta (2016)
. Edson River Tributary Bank Reconstruction and Stabilization near Edson, Alberta (2015)
. Panther River Bank Stabilization Flood Recovery in Alberta (2013)
. Red Deer River Bank Stabilization near Sundre, Alberta (2OL2l r North Saskatchewan River Bank Stabilization at Capital Power Genesee Plant, Alberta (2012)
. Numerous others A brief corporate profile is attached for your perusal, and more specific information on our specialists are provided in the section that follows.
Qualified Environmental Specialists - Kev Personnel An important issue that we believe has a bearing on the outcome of environmental services in general is the credentials, experience, practical knowledge and dedication of the environmental services team. Key experienced personnel who provide specialized expertise are listed in Table 1. CVs for some key staff are attached.
Tabte 1. Key personnel educational background, professional designations/accreditations and years of experience. lPersonnel Education and Designation(s) Years of Experience Kyla Walker-Makowecki M.Sc., QAES, CPESC -20 Katie Thompson B.Sc., P.Biol., QAES, CPESC *8 Kelsey Bourgeois B.Sc., P. Biol., QAES -4 Brady Tether B.Sc., QAES -3 Ray Makowecki tt/.Sc., P.Biol., QAES 40
QAES - Qualified Aquatic Environmental Specialist CPESC - Certified Professional in Erosion and Sediment Control P. Biol. - Professional Biologist (Alberta) Wetland Specialist designated by professional biologist accreditation.
AK Inc. File #000 Page 2 Envkormenhl llno.tsE rl Con3ulEnL
16 Workinq to Meet,Your Needs - Proiect Scope The scope of environmental work is detailed in the attached cost estimate table. Scope of work is expected to include:
L. Project lnitiation, Background lnformation Review, Safety Hazard Assessment and Administration 2. Existing lnformation Review (Terrestrial and Aquatic) (including Species At Risk screening, Environmentally Significant Areas, Map and Aerial Photography Examination, Database Queries, Government Data Requests, etc.) 3. Field Data Collection including potential construction footprint foot level wildlife and vegetation survey and limited QAES fish and fish habitat assessment (assuming adequate existing fisheries inforrnation) 4. Environmental Effects Assessment (Terrestrial and Aquatic) and Environmental Protection Plan (Terrestrial and Aquatic) including mitigation, monitoring and habitat com pen satio n/offsetti ng reco m mendations a nd regu latory scoping 5. Regulatory Approvals Facilitation including Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO), Alberta Environment and Parks (AEP, Water and Public Lands) and Navigable Waters Protection as may be relevant 6. Environmental Monitoring for Construction Workinq to Meet Your Schedule - Tentative Proiect Schedule The project schedule would be intended to meet the proponent and engineering consultant schedule.
Qualitv Credible Results With Efficiencv - Cost Estimate EnviroMak lnc. is a proven long-standing credible consulting firm with experienced water intake environmental specialist staff and hands-on founding principals. We aim to keep overhead low and streamline processes where possible to pass on value, efficiency and savings to our clients all the while maintaining the quality and credibility expected in our scientific methods, protocols and deliverables.
A detailed cost estimate table has been attached. The following notes and/or assumptions are relevant to the scope of work and associated cost estimate. a Reduced travel rates and no additional charge for use of field sampling equipment have been incorporated into the cost estimate. a Field portable turbidity analyses normal fee of S9/sample has been discounted to S0 for this cost estimate.
a Reduced personnel rates have been applied where possible for Non-For Profit organization.
AK Inc. File #000 Page 3 Envhonmenbl *lanrgamnt Con3!luntt
17 EnviroMak is committed to meeting the needs of the client. As such, we are certainly open to discussing the scope of work and rates to ensure your expectations are met.
Qualitv Assurance EnviroMak has a comprehensive quality assurance quality control program that is evident in all areas of operations from hiring of qualified staff to extensive in-house laboratory documented protocols to detailed orientation and training programs to a strong COR Safety Program to an accurate cost tracking system to facilitate that our client's goals are met on time, under budget and with the scientific and regulatory credibility.
Conclusion/Closure Attached are a corporate profile for EnvirotVlak lnc., CVs for key personnel and a detailed Scope of Work and Cost Estimate table.
lf you have any questions or require further information, feel free to contact Kyla Walker- Makowecki by telephone at (780) 425-246L or by email at [email protected].
Thank you for the opportunity to provide this information
Sincerely,
Kyla Walker-Makowecki, M.Sc., QAES, CPESC Principal, EnviroMak lnc.
Attachments: Corporote Profile for EnviroMok lnc. CV's of Key Study Teom Members Scope of Work ond Cost Estimote Table
CC: Eugene Yoremko, Northwest Hydraulic Consultonts Ltd.
NVIRO
AK Inc. File #000 Page 4 Envlronmrnbl Manrgrfircot Con3ulhnta
18 Attach-ments
AK Inc. File #000 Page 5 €nYkgnmitrDl Mara!r,tmt Con3ulhnla
19 CORPORATE PROFILE AK Inc. www.enviromak.com Environmental illanagement Consultants Who We Are Established in 1998, EnviroMak Inc. Environmental Management Consultants serve clients in Alberta and throughout western Canada providing a wide range practical of high quality, innovative and ,.i environmental seruices. With expertise in both aquatic and terrestrial biology, we provide solutions to an extensive scope of environmental challenges hr assisting proponents in meeting their environmental goals and requirements in a range of industries. \ '-! F
Goals To provide clients with efficient effective environmental services To help achieve responsible development, operations and maintenance while ensuring envi ronmental protection To develop innovative practical solutions for Specialists in environmental challenges To produce honest, competent and credible . (Roads, pipelines, Watercourse Crossings scientific results culveds, etc.) bridges, To provide direct personal service of skilled . Pipeline installations, removals and replacements experienced principals and key staff (HDD and open cut) To achieve safety requirements and . Pipeline low depth of cover remediation and expectations throughout the entire scope of work erosion protection . Pipeline integrity dig inspections . Spill, incident and contaminated site assessment and remediation (including HDD frac-outs) ' Temporary access, ice bridges, snow fills . Wetland Classification, Delineation and Compensation Planning . ECOPlans and Erosion and Sedimentation Control (ESC) Plans . Migratory bird survey for clearing . Migratory Bird Management Plans . Culvert and bridge installations, rehabilitation, maintenance, demolitions and replacements . Highway construction, improvements, twinning, passing lane installations, diversions, borrow pits, haul roads . Subdivision and recreational development . Regulatory Approvals
101 18331-105 AVE NW Edmonton Albefta Canada T5S 2K9 T : 7 80 -425-246 1 Toll Free F ax: 877 -420-6462 Email : info @envi ro ma k. com I
20 CORPORATE PROFILE AK fnc. www.enviromak.com Environmentil Managemcnt Gon9ultanb Seryices We offer a variety of quality environmental services including but not limited to:
. Fish and flsh habitat assessment, offsetting plans, regulatory approvals and monitoring . Fish rescue/salvage and relocation . Fish passage evaluation . Fisheries stock assessments . Wetland assessment, classification, quantificaUon and compensation planning . Wetland replacement, restoration, construction and evaluation/monitoring . TSS and turbidity monitoring for potential sedimentation to watercourses . Water quality sampling and monitoring . Limnological (lake) assessment/planning Environment & Safetv . suruey for removal of Nesting and migratory bird EnviroMak is committed to the concept of health and areas and tree stands vegetated safety on and off the work-site. This includes but is . planning, monitoring, Migratory bird mitigation not limited to the protection of personnel, equipment, deterrence and management material and the environment from accidental or . rare plant Vegetation inventories and deliberate loss caused by injuries, illness or . identifi cation and relocation accidents. EnviroMak has developed a comprehensive Noxious weeds screening environment, health and safety program to ensure grass . Topsoil analysis, seed mixture screening adequate hazard identification, control and, that and fedilizer recommendations worker training is adhered to. . Species at Ris( threatened, rare or endangered terrestrial resource surueys An accident, illness, and injury free workplace is our . Critical wildlife corridor and habitat assessment goal. EnviroMak is a registered member with safety . Wildlife-vehiclecollisionmonitoring programs including lSNetworld, Complyworks and . ECOPlans and Erosion and Sedimentation Control COR. Plans (ESCP) . BiophysicalAssessments . Natural Areas and Environmentally Significant Areas Assessments . Phase I, II and III Environmental Assessments . Bioengineering methods and in-channel devices for sediment containment . Streambank erosion protection . Erosion and sediment control planning and monitoring . Environmental monitoring and auditing ' Hydrocarbon remediation and soil sampling , Regulatory approvals and liaison
We are Qualifled Aquatic Environmental Specialists (QAES), Wetland Science Practitioners, Professional Biologists and Cedified Professionals in Erosion and Sediment Control (CPESC).
101 18331-105 AVE NW Edmonton Albefta Canada T5S 2K9 f :780-425-2461 TolI Free Fax: 877-420-6462 Email: [email protected] 2
21 CURRICULUM VITAE
KYLA L. WALKER.MAKOWECKI AK Inc, M.SC., QAES, CPESC
Profile Kyla Walker-Makowecki, principal and co-founder of Plannlng as a Certified Professional in Erosion and EnviroMak Inc. since 1998, has been providing Sediment Control (CPESC). environmental professlonal services and working within the environmental sector for over 20 years, With considerable experience in urban development, Kyla's management of the environmental services for During that time, Walker-Makowecki has managed, the contractor charged with the building of the participated in and provided various envlronmental Terwillegar Park Pedestrian Footbridge crossing the services including but not limited to: Pre- Nodh Saskatchewan River entailed attention to city development Planning; Input on project design or environmental policy and expectations throughout route selection in consideration of client objectives the construction process. and regulator requirements; Study design; Resource Inventory, Evaluation, and N4anagemenu Baseline Kyla has managed and conducted water quality habitat and population assessments (invedebrate, monitoring for lakes, stormwater management fish, habitat); QAES (Quallfied Aquatic Environment facilities, and watercourses of all sizes. Makowecki is Specialist) assessments for roadways, pipelines, and particularly familiar with the development of Erosion outfall structures; Wetland classiflcation, and Sedimentation Control Plans (ESCP) and quantification and compensation assessment; Fish ECOPlans (as required by Alberta Transportation) and tissue sampling; Fish passage/fishway evaluation and the environmental monitoring required to meet the assessmenU Limnological investigations; Migratory objectives of the ESCP and ECOPlan concept. With Bird Survey and Mltigation Planning; Impact EnviroMak previously acting as the regional Assessment, Mitigation, and Compensation; environmental consultant on watercourse crossings Environmental impact assessment (federal and for Alberta Transportation's North Central Region, provincial); lvlitigation planning; Habitat Makowecki was responsible for the administration of compensation design; Habitat restoratlon and environmental assessments for Albefta enhancement; Fish rescue/salvage and relocation; Transportation (North Central Region) watercourse Regulatory Approval Assistance with interpreting the crossings. regulatory process; Negotiations with regulatory agencies; Notifications and Applications for Albeda In recent years, Kyla has developed expetise in the Water Act approvals; Applications and notifications areas of hydrocarbon contamination response and for federal Fisheries Act authorizations; remediation with pafticular focus in natural areas and Environmental monltoring; Turbidity and TSS near and within watercourses/waterbodies. She has monitoring during in-stream construction; Habitat indepth experience and knowledge with respect to utilization monitoring of enhanced habitat and environmental needs and requirements associated compensation habitat; Hydrocarbon remediation of with pipeline integrity, maintenance and installation. soil and water; Expert guidance and contingency and response planning for hydrocarbon spill incidents; Kylat Masters of Science in Civil and Environmental Environmental assessment, regulatory approval Engineering focused on the value of turbldity process and monitoring for pipeline integrity, monitoring for aquatic ecosystem assessment and its maintenance and installation; Horizontal directional applicability to mine tailings management and drilling monitoring and frac-out response; and more. watercourse crossing construction. Her Masters was completed in early 2005 through the University of Walker-l4akowecki has undertaken extensive Alberta. School of lvlining and Petroleum. During that environmental fieldwork and auditing projects as well period, Walker-Makowecki served on the Advanced as administered and managed cost-effectiveness for Mine Design Research Group for the University of a number of significant environmental assessment Albefta and travelled to zambia, Africa to participate and remediation poects such as the Red Deer River in an information exchange on copper mining and oil spill and Highway 63 Twinning near Fort McMurray environmental sustainability. including ECOPlan and Erosion and Sediment Control
Page 1
22 F ruvrno CURRICULUM VITAE KYLA L. WALKER-MAKOWECKI M.SC., QAES, CPESC T{nr}*s, "
Prior to co-founding EnvlroMak Inc. in 1998, Kyla was Additional Trainino and Certification working in the Republic of Kazakhstan with an Canadian Safety Council, international oil company. Makowecki is a member o Incident Investigation, of the various professional and environmental 2017 organizations. . Alberta Wetland Rapid Evaluatlon Tool (ABWRET) Training Course, Salmtec. 2017 Education . Streambank Restoration Techniques, Natural . M.Sc. (Civil & Environmental Engineering) Resources Training Group, 2017 University of Alberta, 2005 . Wetlands Ecology, Delineation and Management, walker-Makowecki, K. L. 2005, Turbidity University of Alberta, 2015 monitoring for aquatic ecosystem assessment . Fish Identification Course, Albefta Society of and its applicability to mine tailings management Professional Biologists, December 2013 and watercourse crossing construction. Masters . Albeda Wetlands: From Classification to Policy of Science Thesis. Department of civil and Course, October 2013 Environmental Engineering. University of Alberta, o Certifled Professional in Erosion and Sediment progress . B.Sc. UniveBity of Athabasca, in Control Course (CPESC), 2013 . B.A. (Political Science) University of Alberta, 1998 . Phase I Environmental Site Assessment CSA Certification Course (AESAC), 2012 Chronolooical Exoerience . Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Seminar . Principal, Envirolvlak Inc. Environmental (AESAC), 2012 Management Consultants (December 1998 -. . identification of Freshwater Fish Course (Natural Present) Resources E)tension Program - NREP) Vancouver . International Administration and community Island University, 2012 Development Manager, Hurricane Hydrocarbons . Fish Habitat Assessment Me$ods of North Kumkol f4unai; Kazakhstan Ltd,/ACCC/Hurricane America Course (NREP) Vancouver Island (1998-1999) University,20l2 . Business Development Manager and Junior . Petroleum Safety Course (PST 2.0),20L4 Environmental Specialist, Westwofth Associates Environmental Ltd. (1997-1998) o Workplace Hazardous l4aterials Information . communications Consultant, Albefta Agriculture, System (WH|4IS), 2072, 2015 Food and Rural Developmenu Edmonton (1997) . Standard First Aid with CPR and AED, 20L2,2016 . H2S Alive, 20t2,2076 Memberships . Pleasure Craft Operator Canada, 2010 . Erosion and Sediment Control Association of . Electrofishing Crew Supervisor Certification, 1998 Canada (ESCAC) . Numerous technical and administrative courses . Canadian Safety Association . Various individual company safety and orientation . Alberta Roadbuilders & Heavy Construction courses Association (ARHCA) . University of Alberta General Alumni Association . Leduc Fish & Game Associauon . Blackhawk Golf Club
Page 2
23 EruvrRo CURRICULUM VITAE RAY MAKOWECKI T{AKInc: B. Ed., M. Sc., P. Biol., QAES
Profile Fisheries Habitat and Director, Northeast Region, for Ray Makowecki, principal of EnviroMak Inc., has been Fish Wildlife. Mr. Makowecki was offering high quality environmental seruices to public Alberta and instrumental in the development of Albeda's fisheries and private sector clients throughout Canada for over protection guidelines, the critical fish habitat 45 years. During this period, Makowecki has habitat maps natural resource protection referral developed extensive experience in the areas of fish and a He later became the Director of Policy and and wildlife biology, ecology, water quality and system. Alberta Environmental aquatic management, geomorphology, forestry, Program Coordination for responsible for the database management, policy development, and Protection, where he was management number of project management. evaluation and of a programs including the Northern River Basins Study, As one of the founders of EnviroMak Inc., Makowecki the Alberta Forest Conservation Strategy, and the has managed, participated in and provided various commercial recreation poliry. environmental seruices including but not limited to: 1993 7996, Mr. Makowecki served as Pre-development Planning; Input on project design From to chairperson of a multi-stakeholder group comprised or route selection in consideration of client objectives industry, conservation groups, academic and regulatory requirements; Study design; Resource of government agencies and aboriginal Inventory, Evaluation, and Management; Baseline researchers, groups development of Albefta's Woodland habitat and population assessments (inveftebrate, in the Caribou Conservation Strategy. He also assessed fish, habitat); QAES (Qualified Aquatic Environment various co-management strategies and agreements Specialist) assessments for roadways, pipelines, and America and developed a provincial outfall structures; Wetland classification, throughout North resource co-management strategy involving quantification and compensation assessment; Fish natural Treaty Indians. Mr. Makowecki was involved in the tissue sampling; Fish passage/fishway evaluation and of the fish habitat legislation within the assessment; Limnological investigations; Migratory development Bird Survey and Mitigation Planning; Impact Fisheries Act in the mid-1970s and Albeta's fisheries protection guidelines. Assessment, Mitigation, and Compensation; habitat Environmental impact assessment (federal and He was also responsible for the fisheries component provincial); Mitigation planning; Habitat of a number of highway functional planning studies in compensation design; Habitat restoration and numerous areas within Albefta and has conducted enhancement; Fish rescue/salvage and relocation; numerous fish stock assessments, Mr. Makowecki Regulatory Approval Assistance with interpreting the has served as an expert witness/advisor for several regulatory process; Negotiations with regulatory legal cases involving fish habitat and sedimentation agencies; Notifications and Applications for Albeda of watercourses. His original Masters degree work Water Act approvals; Applications and notifications focused on Seibert Lake in Nodheast Alberta, for federal Fisheries Act authorizations; specifically studying lake whitefish, nodhern pike, Environmental monitoring; Turbidity and TSS yellow perch and walleye populations. monitoring during in-stream construction; Habitat With respect to environmental monitoring, utilization monitoring enhanced habitat and of Makowecki has significant and current experience compensation habitat; Hydrocarbon remediation of with effective management techniques. Recent work soil and water; Expert guidance and expet witness on highway and bridge watercourse crossing projects for legal matters; expetise for contingency and ranges from initial site assessments on small roads response planning environmental incidents; for throughout Alberta to long-term monitoring of large Environmental assessment, regulatory approval bridge projects such as the Highway 63 twinning in process and monitoring for pipeline integrity, nothern Albeda. Mr. Makowecki believes in maintenance and installation; Horizontal directional providing direct, personal experience in conducting drilling monitoring and frac-out response; and more. fleld assessments, preparing repofts and liaising with Prior to his participation in the environmental regulatory agencies and, in so doing, provides a high management consulting business and development of level of seruice to the client, EnviroMak Inc., Mr. Makowecki serued as Head,
Page 1 24 CURRICULUM VITAE
RAY MAKOWECKI AK Inc. B. Ed., M. Sc., P. Biol., QAES
Chronoloqical Experience Mem berships . Senior Biologist and Principal, EnviroMak Inc. . Albefta Society of Professional Biologists, (October 1998 - Present) Professional Biologist . Senior Fisheries Scientist and Principal, Westworth . Amerjcan Fisheries Society Associates Environmental Ltd. (1995 -1998) . Federation of Alberta Naturalists . Policy and Program Coordinauon, Albefta Environmental Protection (1993 -1997) . Alberta Fish and Game Association . Farm Business Owner (1980 - Present) . The University of Alberta General Alumni . Director, Nodheast Region. Albeda Fish and Association Wildlife Division (1980 -1993) . St. Paul and District Agricultural Society . Head, Fisheries Habitat in Alberta, Alberta Fish . Rural Crime Watch Association and Wildlife Divislon (1978 - 1980) . Fisheries Habitat Development Biologist, Alberta Fish and Wildlife Division (1973 - 1978) . Teaching Assistantship, University of Alberh (1972 - 7973) . High School Level Biology and Science Teacher (1969 - 1973) . Biological Assistant, canadian Wildlife SeMce - Alberta and British Columbia (Summers 1968, 7969, 7970) . Biological Assistant, Fisheries work in various parts of Albefta (SummeB t966, 1967)
Education
. M.Sc., University of Alberta. 1973 . B.Ed., University of Alberta (first class standing). 1969
. B.Sc., University of Alberta (first class standing), 1968
. Numerous technical and administrative courses
Page 2 25 F ruvrno CURRICULUM VITAE KATIE THOMPSON Trl AK rnc. B.SC., P. Biol.,QAES, CPESC
Profile
Intermediate Biologist, Katie Thompson, has been a Prior to working with EnvirolYak inc.. Katie was a key employee with EnviroMak Inc. for the past eight Biology Field Assistant under 2 different individuals at years. During this time, Thompson has conducted the University of Albefta studying amphibian numerous environmental assessments and populations in Albefta; an intern in Hawaij assisting inspections associated with construction, fish the research of a troplcal forest ecology plot to aid in salvages and bird surveys. Thompson is adept in the study of long-term forest functioning; and also scientiflc research and is familiar with the regulatory did data collection for Parks Canada, peftaining to procedures and protocols associated with numerous amphibian species throughout Jasper National Park. environmental applications for licenses, permlts, approvals and authorizations. Chronolooical Exoerience During her time with Envirol4alt Thompson has undeftaken eltensive fleld wor( including Fish and . Biologist, EnviroMak Inc.; (2007 - Present) Rsh habitat assessments; Bird, amphibian and wildlife . Plot Network Intern, Hawaii Permanent Plot quallty surveys; Turbidity/Water monitoring; Fish and Network; Hilo, Hawa,i (March - June 2008) amphibian rescues; Erosion and Sedimentation Assistant Masters Control Inspections; Regulatory compliance . Biology Field with Student monltoring; and Post-construction site inspections. Candra Schank, University of Alberta; Caroline, AB (July Katie is responsible for report application - August 2007) development, review and submission including: . Amphibian Monitor, Park Canada; Jasper, AB Environmental Assessment Reports (including impact (May - June 2007) assessments); Environmental Monitoring Reports; . Biology Field Assistant with PhD Student Connie Post-Construction Monltoring Reports; Environmental Browne, University of Alberta; (Summer 2005 and Protection Plans; Environmental Screening Reports; 2006) Care of Water Plans; Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plans; and wetland, biophysical and plant assessments. Thompson has prepared environmental impact Membershios and Professional assessments for various types of development and/or Desiqnations activities in which she utilizes an EnviroMak impact . Alberta Society Professional Biologists, assessment matrix to identify potential environmental of Professional Biologist efFects, mitigation measures and residual effects. Regulatory scoping for relevant regulatory permitting . The University of Albeda General Alumni processes is a key strength of Katiet wherein she Association provides clients with an understanding of what . Erosion and Sediment Control Association of regulatory processes apply to their activities and Canada (ESCAC), Certified Professional in Erosion facilitates obtaining such approvals. and Sediment Control (CPESC) Having graduated wlth first class honors from the University of Alberta Sciences Degree Program, Thompson has extensive field experience in aquatic habitat and fish habitat surveys and conducted an Education honors project on Western Toad habitat use in relation to invertebrate abundance and diversity in . B.Sc. (Honors in Animal Biology), University oF central Albefta during that time. Alberta,2007
Page 1
26 CURRICULUM VITAE
KATIE THOMPSON AK Inc. B.SC., P. Biol.,QAES, CPESC EnykoilmEnhl Manaqemenl CoGullBnb
Additional Traininq and Ceftification . Certificate of Recognition Internal Safety Auditor . Pleasure Craft Operator,2012 Course, Albefta Safety Association, 2016 . Ice Safety, 2012 o Working Safely on lce, November 2015 . Varioui Onsite Safety Training with different . Incident Investigation (CSC), November 2015 companies e Swift Water Safety Rescue Technician & Boat Safety Technician, Rescue Canada, 2015 . Wetlands Ecology, Delineation and Management, University of Albefta, 2015 . Fall Protection Awareness, 2015 . Workplace Hazardous Materials Information System (WHIMIS), 2075, 2072 . Ice Safety & Rescue - Technician, Raven Rescue, 2015 . Standard First Aid and Level C CPR and AED, 2074,201L . Construction Training Safety System (CSTS), 2074 . Confined Space Awareness,2014 . Certifled Professional in Erosion and Sediment Control Course (CPESC), 2014 . Power Line Safety Awareness (Cenovus), 2014 . Fish Identification Workshop, Alberta Society of Professional Biologists, 2013 . Off-Road Defensive Driving, 2013 e Bear Awareness, 2013 . Alberta Wetlands: From Classification to Policy Course, October 2013 . Fish Habitat Assessment Methods of North America Course (NREP) Vancouver Island University, 2012 . Freshwater Fish Identification Course, (NREP) Vancouver Island University, 2012 r H2S Alive, 2015, 2012 . Petroleum Safety Training (PSD, 2012 . Electrofishing Safety Training, 2012
Page 2
27 CURRICULUM VITAE
KELSEY BOURGEOIS AK Inc. B.SC., P. Biol.,QAES En?lroDmcnlnl Maneqe@nl CoBullnnB
Profile Kelsey Bourgeois joined EnviroMak Inc. in 2011 and Bourgeois has taken extensive and advanced courses has since become a lead ornithologist and wetland in Biology and Ecology during her Bachelor of Science specialist participating in, producing, and managing with Specialization from the University of Alberta. numerous migratory bird surveys and migratory bird This experience has given Bourgeois the foundation survey management plans, biophysical assessments, for excellent analytical research skills. She is currently wetland classification and delineation assessments completing a M.Sc. Royal Roads Masters of Science and associated compensation plans, and natural program in Environment and Management. areas site assessments and management plans, and has been been providing key services to the City of Prior to EnviroMak Inc., Kelsey was a Biological Edmonton Environmental Management (Enviso), and Research Assistant with the University of Alberta, ESC Guidelines. conducting both field and laboratory work monitoring bird nesting sites and wetland vitality, and bird A multi-disciplinary biologist, Kelsey's fieldwork surveys. Kelsey also worked for the Canadian Food experience includes aquatic monitoring, water quality Inspection Agency to gather data and soil samples monitoring and fish rescue associated with from designated areas while following strict and anti- watercourse crossings for highway construction and contamination protocols. Bourgeois also has a great pipeline installation, maintenance and removal. She deal of knowledge and experience handling and has extensive expeftise in the production and caring for wild animals from being a volunteer of the implementation of ECO Plans, Erosion and Wildlife Rehabilitation Society of Edmonton, Sedimentation Control Plans, Migratory Bird Management Plans, Rare Plant Management Plans and weekly environmental reporting associated with Chronolooica I Experience highway construction. . Biologist/Ornithologist, EnviroMak Inc.; (August In particular, Bourgeois has extensive experience in 2011 - Present) wetland assessment, classification, quantification and . Biological Research Assistant, University of delineation as well biophysical assessments and Alberta; (May - luly 2009) ornithology. In this sense, Bourgeois is intimately familiar with the current Albefta Wetland . Soil Sampler, Canadian Food Inspection Agency; Classification System and Policy. She also has had (May - September 2008) training in peatland assessment and has conducted biophysical and wetland assessments in permafrost peatland and ecosystems. Education Bourgeois contributes to the scientific research, o M.Sc. Royal Roads Masters of Science program in writing and revisions of project reports. Environment and Management (in progress) Communication and liaison with government and . (Specialization major Biological other environmental regulatory agencies is a key B.Sc. with in strength, and contributes to EnviroMak's current Science and Animal Biology) University of Albefta, knowledge of the regulatory approvals process and 2009, First Class Standing changing legislation and policy.
Page 1
28 FruvrRo CURRICULUM VITAE KELSEY BOURGEOIS AKlrc: B.SC., P. Biol.,QAES Trl =
Additional Trainino and Ceftification . Alberta Peatland Criteria - Field Training School, a Numerous Bird Identiflcation Courses, Ongoing NAIT, 2016 training through Wild Bird General Store
. Health and Safety Program Building (ASC), Nov a Various onsite safety training with different 20i5 companies . Wetlands Ecology, Delineation and Management, University of Albefta, 2015 . DFO CentraUArctic Region Fisheries Act training, Memberships and Professional 2015 Desiqnations . Ice Safety & Rescue - Technician, Raven Rescue, . The University of Alberta General Alumni 2015 Association . Workplace Hazardous Materials Information . Volunteer, Wildlife Rehabilitation Society of System (WHMIS), 2075, 20Lz Edmonton; (2005-2009) Professional Biologists, . H2S Alive, 2015, 2012 . Alberta Society of Professional Biologist . Construction Safety Training System (CSTS), 2015 . Standard First Aid and Level C CPR and AED, 2074 . Petroleum Safety Training (PSf), 2014 . Power Line Safety Awareness (Cenovus), 2014 . Fish Identification Course, Albeda Society of Professional Biologists, December 2013 . Certified Professional in Erosion and Sediment Control Pre Exam Course (CPESC), 2013 . Ice Safety Protocol, 2013 r Bear Awareness, 2013 . Identification of Freshwater Fish Course (Natural Resources Extension Program - NREP) Vancouver Island Universiil, 20t2 . Fish Habitat Assessment Methods of North America Course (NREP) Vancouver Island University, 2012 . Small Employer Program Building Course (ASC), 20L2 . Electrofishing Safety Training, 2012 . Defensive Driving Certiflcation, 2009 . Animal Care/Research Course, 2009
Page 2
29 AL SERVICES DETAILED OFWORK AND COST ESTIMATE Devon Liors Club North Smkatchewan River Bank Devon, Alberta NVIRO 201.7, TOWN: River K Inc, Dale McCortrick Lions BY: EnviroMak Inc. Environmental PERSON DAYS BI]DGET (CDN$) Project Senior Biologist/ Tech and Admin position Manager Biologist/QAES QAES lunior Bio Travel Rate Support code PM SRBIO BIO IR BIO TECH AS TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL daily PREFERRED rate applied 1000.00 800.00 640.00 520.00 400.00 320.00 FEES ($) EXPENSES ($) ESTMATE standard rate 1200.00 1000.00 640.00 520.00 400.00 320.00 TASKDESCRIPTION
1.0 Pre-Construction Environmental Assessment and Environmental Protection Plan for Regulatory Permitting
Project Initiation and Scoping (including Start up Communications, Identification of Issues, Salety Hazard Assessmmt, Key Value Indicators and Study Boundaries, Sampling Protocol Developmen! Research Licences Procurement, Logistics and Mobilization) 0.25 0.50 0.50 810.00 810.00 Desktop Screening (including Review of Existing InJomation, Database Queries, Species at Risk Aerial Photo Interpretation, Construction and/or Engineering Plan review, etc.) 0.25 0.25 1.00 0.25 840.00 100.00 940.00
Aquatic (Limited Fish and I'ish Habitat) Field Assessment and Tenestrial/Wildlife Field Survey of No charge for Potential Footprint of Disturbance* 1.00 1.00 1M0.00 field equipment 1040.00 tlavel ($0.50/km)* 0.50 200.00 35.00 235.00 per diem ($65ldaylperson) 0.00 0.00 accommodation 0.00 0.00 Discounted to water quality# 0.00 240.00 $0
Envirolmental Effects and Mitigation Assessment Report, Environmental Protection Plan (including Instream SiIt and Erosion Conb'ol Care of Water Plan and Environmental Monitoring Plan as may be applicable) and Regulatory Scoping for Pemritting 1.50 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 3480.00 3480.00 Regulatory Applicatioru/Notifications (i.e. AEP (Water and Public Lands), DFO and NWP as may be applicable)* 1.00 1.00 2.50 1.00 2760.00 50.00 2810.00 Meetings, Adminishatiorl Safety Management, Liaison, Communications, Project Managementand Expert Guidance*** 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 630.00 630.00 phase totals 0.50 3.50 3.25 1.00 7.25 3.00 9760.00 425.00 9945.00 +GST
EnviroMak lnc. Page 1 of2 30 Orcr
PERSONDAYS ) Project Senior Biologist/ Tech and Admin position Marager Biologist/QAES QAIS Junior Bio Trave] Rate Support code PM SR BIO BIO IR BIO TECH AS TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL daily PREFERRED rate applied 1000.00 800.00 540.00 s20.00 400.00 320.00 FEES ($) EXPENSES ($) ESTIMATE standard rate 1200.00 1000.00 540.00 520.00 400.00 320.00 TASKDESCRIPTION
20 Monitoting for Construction
Can be provided upon construction method and schedule determination
phase totals
Prefened rat6 applied for Prcl(t Manager and Senior Biologist. 'No charge for field equipment aPptied. 6eld effort for fuh and fish habitat assssment on infomation be available in *Reduced travel rates applied (reduced from $0.57km to $0.50/km; reduced applied for trdvel time where possible). *Discounts applied to water quality analyses: Routins $90 (Discounted to $0) NTU: $9 (Discounted to $0) quoted on considenble experience. *Effort associated with facilitation ofregulatory apProvals is subj(t to change due to variarcs exp(ted in regulatory reviews. Level of effort based sintlar :!n in addition to the budget at daily preferred rates. *Requests for Farticipation at additional metings or additional advice/guidance in addi to &e scopewould bebilled Proposed Pssonnel Budget subi(t to change depending upon unpredictable sitespeific factors and unfoGen legulalory influencd. tf less effort/cost required, actual costs will be billed and savings passed on to (lient
Page 2 ol 2 EnviroMak lnc. 31 ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ASSESSMENT REPORT
DEVON LIONS CLUB NORTH SASKATCHEWAN RIVER PROPOSED BANK PROTECTION tN w35-50-26-W4M
NVIRO AK Inc, Environmental Management Consultants
32 ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ASSESSMENT REPORT
DEVON LIONS CLUB NORTH SASKATCHEWAN RIVER PROPOSED BANK PROTECTION tN w35-50-26-W4M
Submitted to: Submitted by:
MR. DALE MoCoRMIcK K. L. WALKER-MAKowEcKr, K. THoMPSoN & OF S. RAMLER
DEvoN LroNs CLUB OF
DEVoN, ALBERTA ENVIRoMAK INc, ENvIRoNMENTAL MANAGEMENT CoNSULTANTS
EDNIoNToN, ALBERTA
June 12,2017
33 F lrvrno Environmental Efiecls Assessment (EA) for Proposed Bank Protection on the Norlh Saskatchewan River I{at-r.rs, Wthin Devon. Alberta at W35,50-26-W4M
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 1 2.O OBJECTIVES 2 3.0 STUDY AREA 3 4.0 sTUDY METHODS ...... 5 4.1 Existing lnformation Review ...... 5 4.2 Field Data Collection 5 4.3 Environmental Effecrs Assessment..... 6 4.4 Regulatory Scoping... 6 5.0 EXISTING INFORMATION REVIEW...... 7 5.1 Climate 7 5.2 Ecoregion, Sor/s and Topography 7 5.3 Environmentally Significant Areas.. 7 5.4 Historical Resource tisfrng...... 7 6A Existing Wildlife lnformation (Mammals, Birds, Amphibians and Reptiles)..... 8 5.6 Existing Vegetation lnformation...... I 5.7 Wetland lnventory ...... 8 5.8 Habitat Suitability I
5.9 Wate rs h e d C h a ra cte ri sti c s 10
5.10 Exi sti ng F i sh e ie s I nform ation ... 11 6.0 FIELD DATA COLLECTION RESULTS ... 13 6.1 Overall Landscape ...... 13 6.2 Aquatic Ecosystem - Norlh Saskatchewan River ...... 13 6.3 Wildlife, Vegetation and Other Valued Ecological Component Survey Resu/ts 14 7.0 ENGINEERING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PLAN...... 18
7.1 Rationale for Activity ...... 1 8 7.2 Overview of Activity...... '18 '18 t.J Tentative Sch ed u le and Activity D u ration......
Di stu rb an ce Qu antification .. 19 8.0 POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS 20
8.1 Construction Activities with Potential Environmental Effects .. 20 8.2 Potenti al Effects on Tene stri al Ecosystem...... 20 8.3 Potential Effects on Aquatic Ecosystem ...... 20
EnviroMak lnc.#17-r8 Page I
34 Frvrno Environmental Effects Assessment (EA) for Proposed Bank Proteclion on the North Saskalchewan River I{u:nq- Within Devon, Alberta at W35-50-26-W4M
8.4 Other Potential Effects...... 21 8.5 Potential Effects Significance Summary .21 9.0 MITIGATION AND RESIDUAL EFFECTS 23 9.1 ConstructionTiming 23 9.2 Aquatic Ecosystem 24 9.3 Terrestrial Ecosystem ...... 26 9.4 General Construction Activity.. 27 9.5 Public Safety and Navigation 27 9.6 Contractor Safety and Environmental lncident Prevention and Response...... 27 9.7 HistoricalResources ...... 27 9.8 Potential Effects with Mitigation Significance Summary... 28 10.0 MoNtToRtNG PLAN.. .. 29 29
1 0.2 Stage 2...... 30 1,1 .O REGULATORY PERMITTING..... 31 11.1 Federal ...... 3'l
1 1 .2 Provincial 3'l
1 1 .3 Municipal ..... 3'l
1 1.4 Regulatory Scoping Resu/ts...... 32 12.0 CONCLUSIONS JJ 13.0 LIMITATIONS AND CLOSURE ....34 ,I4.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY ...... 35 15.0 APPENDICES... 37 15.1 Pre-disturbance Site Photographs ...... 38 1 5.2 Watershed Graphs...... 45 15.3 Engineering Design Plan and Repoft...... 48
Envirol\4ak lnc.#17-18 Page ll
35 LIST OF TABLES
Table 5.1. General location descriptors at W35-50-26-W4M. . 8
Table 5.2. Species of concern which have been identified within a 2km radius of W35-50-26- W4lril according to the FWIUIS and ACIMS o
Table 5.3. Habitat suitability of SW35-50-26-W4M for specific species at risk and keystone species as per the Government of Alberta's Habitat Suitability Index Model Search Tool. ... o
Table 5.4. Watershed characteristics of the North Saskatchewan River within W35-50-26-W4lvl...... 10
Table 5.5. Alberta fish status and potential spawning periods for the North Saskatchewan River. .11
Table 6.1. Morphometric, bed and riparian characteristics associated with the North Saskatchewan River at W35-50-26-W4M on June 2, 2017...... 14
Table 6.2. Vegetation and wildlife identified and/or observed within the study area on June 2, 2017...... 16
Table 8.1. Srgnificance of potential environmental effects resulting from the proposed bank protection project in the North Saskatchewan River at W35-50-26-W4M, without mitigation. ....22
Table 9.1. Potential restricted activity timing and setback distances identified at W35-50-26- w4[/1...... 23
Table 9.2. Significance of potential environmental effects resulting from the proposed bank protection on the North Saskatchewan River at W35-50-26-W4M, with mitigation...... 28
EnviroMak lnc.#17-18 Page lll
36 LIST OF FlGURES
Figure 3.1. Location of proposed bank protection works at W35-50-26-W4M (ou ined in black; IVlemory-Map, 2000)...... 3
Figure 3.2. North Saskatchewan River at W35-50-26-W4M; approximate project area highlighted in yellow (Google Earth, 2017) 4
Figure 6.1. Morphometric features and sampling sites associated with the field reconnaissance of the proposed bank protection works on the North Saskatchewan River within W35-50-26- W4M (Google Eanh,2o17)...... 17
Figure 15.1. Monthly Discharge graph for North Saskatchewan River at Highway No. 759 (upstream of project area); statistics corresponding to 8 years of data recorded from 2OO7 to 2014(Government of Canada Historical Hydrometric Data)...... 46
Figure 15.2. Monthly Discharge graph for North Saskatchewan River at Edmonton (downstream of project area); statistics corresponding to 104 years of data recorded from 191 1 to 2014 (Government of Canada Historical Hydrometric Data)...... 46
Figure 15.3. 2017 discharge data for the North Saskatchewan River at Highway No. 759 (upstream of project area) (AEP Alberta River Basins).. 47
Figure 15.4. 2017 discharge data for the North Saskatchewan River at Edmonton (downstream of project area (AEP Alberta River Basins)... 47
EnviroMak lnc.#17-18 Page lV
37 F nvrno Environmental Effects Assessment (EA) for Proposed Bank Protection on the North Saskatchewan River T{*rlre- Within Devon, Alberta at W35-50-26-W4M
1.0 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
The Devon Lions Club is proposing to protect a portion of the North Saskatchewan River bank at W35-50- 26-W4M. The eroding bank is located adjacent to the Devon Lions Campground in Devon, Alberta and parallels narrowly to an existing access roadway. In this regard, the riverbank erosion threatens the infrastructure ofthe access and campground.
As such, the Devon Lions Club contracted a river engineering consultant and environmental consultant to assist in developing and implementing an erosion protection plan. The engineering consultant tasked with developing an engineered design for the project is Northwest Hydraulic Consultants 0.fHC) and the environmental consultant is EnviroMak Inc. Environmental Management Consultants (EnviroMak).
EnviroMak has been retained by the Devon Lions Club to identify, describe and evaluate potential environmental effects, environmental mitigation, residual effects, and to make recommendations in regards to regulatory permitting, monitoring and overall environmental protection planning. EnviroMak Inc. focused its expertise on gathering sufficient baseline information on the aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, assessing the potential effects of the engineering and construction plan, establishing an environmental mitigation and protection plan, developing an environmental monitoring plan and identiffing relevant regulatory permitting processes. The results of the assessment are provided in the report that follows.
EnviroMak lnc.#17-'18 Page 'l
38 Fuvrno Environmental Effects Assessment (EA) for Proposed Bank Protection on the North Saskatchewan River T{ *rlls"- Wthin Devon, Alberta at W35-50-26-W4M
2.0 OBJECTIVES
The specific objectives of this assessment were:
. To design an environmental effects assessment that would identify and effectively assess the status of relevant Valued Ecosystem Components (VECs) prior to the proposed activity;
o To conduct a thorough existing information review to identify and describe Valued Ecosystem Components (VECs) from existing databases, map and aerial photography, previous studies and other sources of information;
a To undertake field verification of the various Valued Ecosystem Components (VECs) including as applicable:
o aquatic ecosystem assessment that describes the present state of the aquatic resources (and/or verifies existing baseline aquatic ecosystem information) that may be potentially impacted by the proposed activity
o vegetation and wildlife survey that describes the present state of the vegetation and wildlife resources (and/or verifies existing information) that may be potentially impacted by the proposed activity
o other sensitive feature and/or species surveys as may be warranted by the results of the existing information review
a To assess the potential ecological impacts and risk to Valued Ecosystem Components (VECs) that may result from the proposed engineering design and construction plan;
a To identify measures to prevenVavoid, reduce/minimize and/or eliminate potential ecological impacts and risks;
a To identify any residual ecological impacts and their significance from the pathway of effects;
a To prepare recommendations for environmental monitoring and overall environmental protection planning;
a To provide scoping of the regulatory approvals/guidelines/requirements that may apply to the activity from relevant municipal, provincial and federal government agencies, and;
a To assist in making arrangements for required environmental approvals from relevant provincial and federal government agencies.
EnviroMak lnc.#'17-18 Page 2
39 F ruvrno Environmental Effects Assessment (EA) for Proposed Bank Protection on the North Saskatchewan River T{ *,ql}g-- Within Devon, Alberta at W35-50-26-W4M
3.0 STUDY AREA
The proposed bank protection project is within W35-50-26-W4M (Figures 3.1 and 3.2). The eroded bank is located near the Devon Lions Campground in Devon, Alberta and parallels narrowly the campground access roadway. 't
I I I n
\J
s
!7-
oo J
I d + i
o I ls ! f" o r I,o o l I i 14* 0 I
q- a I i
bo O?% i{( I
o o I s,
i o€ 8 18 o f" --'7 -+ a -q-l I o I I ic
Figure 3.1. Location of proposed bank protection works at W35-50-26-W4M (outlined in black; Memory- Map,2000).
EnviroMak lnc.#17-18 Page 3
40 Fnvrno Environmental Effects Assessment (EA) for Proposed Bank Protection on the North Saskatchewan River T{*r-ms=- Within Devon, Alberta at W35-50-26-W4M
7 l,
t'{ t North ,tel\ :-, River \ tr
Figure 3.2. North Saskatchewan River at W35-50-26-W4M; approximate project area highlighted in yellow (Google Earth, 20 17).
EnviroMak lnc.#17-18 Page 4
41 NVIRO Environmental Effects Assessment (EA) for Proposed Bank Protection on the North Saskatchewan River Within Devon, Alberta at W35-50-26-W4M
4.0 STUDY METHODS
4.1 Existing lnformation Review
The desktop existing information review included map and aerial photography interpretation, ground level photograph examination, and existing database queries. Valued Ecosystem Components (VECs) and/or ecological sensitivities were identified from a variety of sources including: The Alberta Conservation Information Management System (ACIMS 2017), federal endangered species lists (COSEWIC), Alberta wild species general status listing (Government of Alberta 2015), Fish and Wildlife Management Information System (FWMIS 2017), the Landscape Analysis Tool (LAT), the Alberta Merged Wetland Inventory, and other sources.
4.2 Field Data Collection
Based on the review of existing information and considering the project specifications, field reconnaissance to verify, identify and describe VECs was undertaken on June 2 and 4, 2017. The methodology of the assessment included both a terrestrial field survey focusing on wildlife and vegetation and a limited aquatic ecosystem assessment. The methods for these specific surveys are rooted in the relevant EnviroMak field protocols which are based on relevant federal and provincial survey requirements and standards.
The legislated requirements for terrestrial ecosystem assessments are particularly relevant to rare and endangered wildlife species (Section 6 of the Alberta Wildlife Acl and Section 7 of the Wildlife Regulation) and migratory birds. Matters associated with critical or significant wildlife habitats and cumulative effects were also examined. The specific areas addressed included:
o Presence ofthreatened, rare, or endangered terrestrial resources;
o Presence of critical wildlife habitats including amphibian and reptile habitat;
. Presence of wildlife movement corridors;
o Presence of wetlands; and,
o Presence ofnoxious weeds.
The aquatic ecosystem field assessment followed the sampling methodology detailed in the EnviroMak protocol which was developed to meet the expectations and criteria identified in the Government of Alberta Code of Practice and/or Water Act. The aquatic assessment is supported by information that provides the basic site description information, engineering and construction specifications, existing biological information, field assessment information (e.g., site data, stream bank characteristics, riparian description, wildlife use), and overall assessment. The aquatic assessment was limited due to high flow levels and limited access to the waterbody.
EnviroMak lnc.#17-18 Page 5
42 Envrno Environmental Effects Assessment (EA) for Proposed Bank Protection on the North Saskatchewan River Tvlglsq- Within Devon, Alberta at W35-50-26-W4M
4.3 Environmental EffectsAssessmenf
Existing information and project specifications were considered in the overall interpretation and assessment of environmental effects and recommendations for mitigation and monitoring and overall environmental protection planning. The environmental effects assessment consisted of the following step-wise approach:
o Identi0 Potential Effects
. Identi& Mitigation Measures
o Identi0 Residual Effects
o Identify the Significance of the Residual Effects
o IdentiSEnvironmentalMonitoringRequirements
4.4 Regulatory Scoping
A scoping ofrelevant legislation, guidelines and regulations in consideration ofthe project specifications was undertaken to verify the acceptability and comprehensiveness of the study methodology initially. The relevant regulatory processes and expectations were then considered in relation to the project specifications and environmental effects assessment to determine which processes applied to the design and activity in the form of expected avoidance, mitigation, best management practices, monitoring, compensation/offsetting, and in the form of regulatory applications and approvals and/or notifications processes.
EnviroMak lnc.#17-18 Page 6
43 Fruvrno Environmental Effects Assessment (EA) for Proposed Bank Protection on the North Saskatchewan River T{ull-..- Within Devon, Alberta at W35-50-26-W4M
5.0 EXISTING INFORMATION REVIEW
5.1 Climate
Climate data was gathered from Government of Canada Canadian Climate Normals and Averages (2017) which maintains a weather station at Edmonton's International Airport (approximately 12km from site). Edmonton temperature averages 2.6oC annually; the July mean is 16.2oC, and the January mean is -12.1"C (Government of Canada 2017). Mean annual precipitation is 446.1mm with approximately l18.1cm occurring as snowfall and 338.8mm as rainfall.
5.2 Ecoregion, Soils and Topography
The site was within the Parkland Natural Region (Central Parkland subregion; Government of Alberta 2005) within the Thick Black/Dark Gray-Gray Soil one of Central and East-Central Alberta (Soil Correlation Area l0; Agroclimate 2H,3H; Alberta Agriculture and Forestry 2016; Table 5.1).
5.3 Environmentally Significant Areas
The Government of Alberta Environmentally Significant Areas Map (Government of Alberta 2014) does not identify this area to be an Environmentally Significant Area (ESA).
The Govemment of Alberta's Fish and Wildlife Management Information System (FWMIS 2017) and the Alberta Energy Regulators Landscape Analysis Tool (LAT 2017) were accessed to identify additional sensitivities (Table 5.1). It was determined that the inspection site is located within the following areas:
1. Grassland and/or Parkland Natural Region 2. Other Sensitive and Endangered Species Area 3. Sensitive Raptor Range (Bald Eagle) 4- Sharp-tailed Grouse Survey Area
5.4 Historical Resource Listing
The Listing of Historic Resources (Alberta Culture and Tourism 2017) has identified potential historic resources (HRV 5 a,p) at W35-50-26-W4M (Table 5.1). Land that has been identified to contain potential historic resources are assigned a Historic Resource Value (HRV) which indicates the level of protection given to those lands. HRV I is awarded the highest level of protection and HRV 5 the lowest. Additionally, lands are categorized alphabetically to describe the primary historic resource category of concern (a: archaeological; c: cultural; gl: geological; h: historic period; n: natural; p: paleontological) (Culture and Tourism 2015).
EnviroMak lnc.#17-18 Page 7
44 F nvrno Environmental Effects Assessment (EA) for Proposed Bank Protection on the North Saskatchewan River Tvl lr-l"r'"s'* Within Devon, Alberta at W35-50-26-W4M
Table 5.1. General location descriptors at W35-50-26-W4M. Descriptor Specific Location Legal Land Description w35-50-26-W4M lSoil Correlation Area 10 2Ecoregion Parkland - Central Parkland 3Municipality Town of Devon Parkland County 3First Nations Land None as per FWMIS aEnvironmentally Signifi cant Area No Sharp-tailed Grouse Survey Area Sensitive Raptor Range (Bald Eagle) Wildlife Sensitivities Grassland and/or Parkland Natural Region Other Sensitive and Endangered Species Nearest Town/City Devon, Alberta 3GreenMhite Management Area White 5Historical Resource Listings 5 a,p
6UTM 12U 319913.65 m E 5915813.17 m N 6LauLong 53.3607 24' -1 13.7 06332" 2 3 4Govemment 'AAFC 2016 Government of Alberta 2005 FWMIS (2017) of Alberta ESA Map (2014) 5 Alberta Culture and Tourism Listing of Historic Resources (2017) 6 Google Earth Pro 201 7 (Coordinates approximate)
5.5 Existing Wildlife lnformation (Mammals, Birds, Amphibians and Reptiles)
A search of the Fish and Wildlife Management Information System (FWMIS 2017) indicated that the site falls within a Sharp-tailed Grouse Survey Area and a Sensitive Raptor Range (Bald Eagle). There were few documented sensitive wildlife species noted within a 2km radius of the project site (Table 5.2; FWMIS 2017). A colonial nesting site (Great Blue Heron) is located approximately 5km northwest of the project site (AEP 2010). Beaver (Castor canadensis) have been previously observed on the left bank near the project area (K. Walker-Makowecki per. comm.).
5.6 ExistingVegetation lnformation
The Alberta Conservation Information Management System (ACIMS Online Database 2017) identifred one species that is considered a non-sensitive elemental concern at 35-50-26-W4M (Table 5.2).
5.7 Wetland lnventory
The Alberta Environment and Parks (2017) Merged Wetland Inventory Index (accessed via GeoDiscover Alberta) indicated the presence of a marsh wetland along the river bank of the North Saskatchewan River at the project location. The wetland database is not complete and is not expected to capture all wetlands located on a specific parcel of land. Further, in some cases, wetlands that appear present in the database may not be present in actuality.
EnviroMak lnc.#17-18 Page B
45 NVIRO Environmental Effects Assessment (EA) for Proposed Bank Protection on the North Saskatchewan River AK Inc. \Mthin Devon, Alberta at W35-50-26-W4M
Table 5.2. Species of concern which have been identified within a 2l 5.8 HabitatSuitability The Government of Alberta's Habitat Suitability Index Model Search Tool (Version2.2) was accessed to identify if the project area has any habitat features that are commonly associated with specific species at risk or specific keystone species (Table 5.3). The HSI Model Search Tool is designed to help determine what predevelopment surveys may be necessary for a specific project; however, the tool is not complete and does not provide information for all areas of Alberta. While NW35-50-26-W4M was not in the database, SW35-50-26-W4M revealed that there is high suitability for some species. Table 5.3. Habitat suitability of SW35-50-26-W4M for specific species at risk and keystone species as per the Government of Alberta's Habitat Suitability Index Model Search Tool. Species at Risk Highly Suitable Suitable Less Suitable Least Suitable Long-billed Curlew 0 49 0 50 Prairie Falcon 0 0 0 99 Sharp{ailed Grouse 100 0 0 0 Ferruginous Hawk 22 0 0 77 Short-horned Lizard 0 94 0 o Burrowing Owl 0 0 22 77 Sprague's Pipit 0 0 0 100 Loggerhead Shrike 0 0 75 24 Prairie Rattlesnake 60 28 12 0 Plains Spadefoot 0 0 22 77 Great Plains Toad 0 0 0 99 American Badger- 0 0 0 oo Richardson's Ground Squirrel* 0 0 0 oo *Keystone species EnviroMak lnc.#17-18 Page 9 46 NVIRO Environmental Effects Assessment (EA) for Proposed Bank Protection on the North Saskatchewan River *K-{n** Within Devon, Alberta at W35-50-26-W4M 5.9 Watershed Characteristics The property at W35-50-26-W4M is located in the middle area of the North Saskatchewan River watershed Table 5.4). The North Saskatchewan River Basin covers approximately 80,000 km2 of Alberta (AEP 2016). The North Saskatchewan River originates in Banff National Park and is approximately 1,287 km in length (Canadian Encyclopedia20lT). It flows adjacent and north of the town of Devon then through the city of Edmonton and eventually flows into the Saskatchewan River. According to the Government of Canada's Historical Hydrometic Data (Appendix 15.2), flows upstream of the project area (North Saskatchewan River at Highway 759) begin to increase in April, peak in June, and begin decreasing in July; the lowest flow rates are recorded from December to March. However, the Big Horn Dam and Brazeau Dam are both located in the watershed and have influence on North Saskatchewan fuver flows within the project area. The North Saskatchewan River is a navigable water body that is listed scheduled under the Navigation Protection Act. Considerable seasonal recreational use ofthe river is expected. The study area is located within the floodplain of the North Saskatchewan River. Previous flooding throughout the campground has been noted (D. McCormick, per. comm.). On April 26, 2016 Tetra Tech EBA (TT 201 6) completed an assessment of the study area that focused on the condition of the riverbank in regards to erosion and instability. It was determined that erosion along the northem portion of the study limit (near the entrance to the campground) was relatively low due to the presence of a sandbar in the river; erosion near the existing stormwater outfall was observed but determined tobecausedbylackofprotectionmeasuresattheoutfallratherthantheforceoftheriver(TT20l6). The area vulnerable to the greatest erosion is approximately 100m - 250m south of the outfall, where vegetation is minimal. Based on previous photographs, Tetra Tech (2016) thought that this area may have eroded/slumped as much as I m between November 20 l3 and April 201 6. Table 5.4. Watershed characteristics of the North Saskatchewan River within W35-50-26-W4M Drainage Gharacteristic Measure 3watershed (River Basin) North Saskatchewan River Basin 2FWMIS Waterbody ld 2162 3General Location in Basin Middle Stream Order o lAlbefta Water Act Code of Practice for Watercourse Crossings Class C (September 16 July 31) Classification - rAlberta Water Act Code of Practice for Watercourse Crossings Maps (Red Deer 2006) FWMIS rAlberta Basins (AEP '? (2017) River 2017) EnviroMak lnc.#17-18 Page 10 47 Fnvrno Environmental Effects Assessment (EA) for Proposed Bank Protection on the North Saskatchewan River T{u-ln:* Within Devon, Alberta at W35-50-26-W4M 5.10 Existing Fisheries lnformation The North Saskatchewan fuver is designated a Class C watercourse with a Restricted Activity Period for fisheriesof September l6toJuly3l atthislocationaccordingtotheAlbertaWaterActCode of Practice for Watercourse Crossings Maps (2006). Class C designation indicates moderately sensitive fisheries resources. Existing information contained on the AEP Fish and Wildlife Management Information System (FWMIS 2017) provided references for Arctic Grayling, Brook Trout, Bull Trout, Brown Trout, Brook Stickleback, Burbot, Cutthroat Trout X Rainbow Trout, Cutthroat Trout, Emerald Shiner, Flathead Chub, Finescale Dace, Fathead Minnow, Goldfish, Goldeye, Iowa Darter, Lake Chub, Lake Sturgeon, Lake Trout, Lake Whitefish, Longnose Dace, Longnose Sucker, Mountain Sucker, Mountain Whitefish, Mooneye, Northern Redbelly Dace, Northern Pike, Pearl Dace, Quillback, Rainbow Trout, River Shiner, Sauger, Shorthead Redhorse, Silver Redhorse, Spoonhead Sculpin, Spottail Shiner, Trout-perch, Walleye, White Sucker and Yellow Perch within the North Saskatchewan River (Table 5.5). Within the vicinity of the project location (2km radius), Emerald Shiner, Goldeye, Lake Sturgeon, Longnose Dace, Longnose Sucker, Mountain Whitefish, Northern Pike, River Shiner, Sauger, Shorthead Redhorse, Trout-perch, Walleye and White Sucker have all been observed/caught during previous sampling efforts (FWMIS 2017). Table 5.5. Alberta fish status and potential spawning periods for the North Saskatchewan River Common Name Scientific Name Code Presencel Provincial Spawning Status2,3 Period4,5'6 Arctic Gravlino Thymallus arcticus ARGR D May Be At Risk Apr - Jun Brook Stickleback Culaea lnconsfans BRST D Secure May - Jul Brook Trout Salvelinus fontinalis BKTR tr Exotic/Alien Sept - Nov Brown Trout Salmo trutta BNTR tr Exotic/Alien Oct- Dec Bull Trout Salvelinus confl uentus BLTR a At Risk Sept - Oct Burbot Lota lota BURB o Secure Feb - Mar Cutthroat Trout x Rainbow Oncorhynchus clarki x o CRTR Not listed Trout oncorhynchus mykissv Unknown Cutthroat trout Oncorhynchus clarki CTTR tr At Risk May - Jun Emerald Shiner Notropis atherinoides EMSH trI Secure Jun - Auq Fathead Minnow Pimephales promelas FTMN o Secure Jun - Auq Finescale Dace Phoxinus neogaeus FNDC tr Undetermined Jun - Jul Flathead Chub Platygobio gracilis FLCH tr Secure Jul - Auo Goldfish Carasslus auratus GOFS tr Not Listed Unknown Goldeye Hiodon a/osordes GOLD trr Secure May -Jul lowa Darter Etheostoma exile IWDR o Secure May - Jun Lake Chub Couesius plumbeus LKCH ! Secure Apr - Auq Lake Sturgeon Acipenser fulyescens LKST !! At Risk Apr - Jun Lake Trout Salvelinus namaycush LKTR D Sensitive Sept- Oct Lake Whitefish Coreqonus cl upeaformi s Ll(/UH tr Secure Sept - Jan Lononose Dace Rh i n i chth ys c ata ra ct a e LNDC u! Secure May - Aug Longnose Sucker Catostomus catostomus LNSC OI Secure May - Jul Mooneye Hiodon tergisus MOON tr Secure Apr- Jun EnviroMak lnc.#17-18 Page 'l 1 48 F nvrno Environmental Effects Assessment (EA) for Proposed Bank Protection on the North Saskatchewan River T{uxt, Within Devon, Alberta at W35-50-26-W4M Common Name Scientific Name Code Presencei Provincial Spawning Status2,3 Period4,5,6 Mountain Sucker Catostomu s Dlatvrhvncht ts MNSC tr Secure Jun - Jul Mountain Whitefish Prosopium williamsoni MNWH trt Secure Sept - Nov Northern Pike Esox lucius NRPK trI Secure Apr - May Northern Redbelly Dace Phoxinus eos NRDC tr Sensitive Jul - Auq Pearl Dace Margariscus maroarita PRDC tr Undetermined May - Jun Quillback Carpiodes cyprinus QUIL tr Undetermined May - Jul tr At Rainbow Trout Oncorhynchus myklss RNTR Mar - Jun Risk/ThreatenedT River Shiner Notropis blennius RVSH trI Undetermined Jul - Aug Sauger Stizostedion canaden se SAUG trt Sensitive Apr - Jun Moxostoma tra Shorthead Redhorse macrolepidotum SHRD Secure May Silver Redhorse Moxostoma anisurum SLRD tr Undetermined May - Jun Spoonhead Sculoin Coftus ricei SPSC tr May Be At Risk Aor- Mav Spottail Shiner Notropis hudsonius SPSH ! Secure Jun - Auq Trout-perch Percopsis omiscomaycus TRPR !I Secure May - Auq Walleye Sander vitreus WALL trt Secure Apr - May White Sucker Casosfomus commersoni WHSC trt Secure May - Jul Yellow Perch Perca flavescens YLPR D Secure Aor - Mav o Historically documented in the North Saskatchewan River r Historically documented in the North Saskatchewan River near project (2km radius) 2Government ofAlberta Wild Species Status Search (2015 Species Status) 3Government of Alberta Species at Risk (2014) aDerlukewich. 2013. Fish of Alberta Field Identification. sJoynt, - A., and Sullivan, M. 2003. Fish of Alberta. Lone Pine Publishing. National Library of Canada Cataloguing in Publication Data. 6langhorne, A. L., M. Neufeld, G. Hoar, V. Bourhis, D. A. Fernet and C. K. Minns. 2001. Life history characteristics of freshwater fishes occurring in Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta, with major emphasis on lake habitat requirements. Can. MS Rpt. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2579:xii + 170 pp. Native stocks of Rainbow Trout within the historical distribution in Alberta (Athabasca River) have suffered introgression from introduced trout. This native form is considered At Risk after a status review in Alberta. Introduced stocks ofRainbow Trout in Alberta are secure. EnviroMak lnc.#17-18 Page 12 49 Fnvrno Environmental Effects Assessment (EA) for Proposed Bank Protection on the North Saskatchewan River T{tt-lsq- Within Devon, Alberta at W35-50-26-W4M 6.0 FIELD DATA COLLECTION RESULTS A field survey of the study area was conducted on June 2 and June 4, 2077. On June 2, it was initially warm and sunny (approximately -20"C); however, as the survey progressed, wind picked up and blew in a storm front. With this storm front came heavy rains with lightning and thunder such that the survey had to be temporarily halted. On June 4, the conditions were warm and sunny (approximately 21oC) throughout the assessment. 6.1 Overall Landscape The assessment area was found within the Devon Lions Campground. To enter the campground one must drive through the Devon Golf and Conference Center west of the campground. A road through the campground follows on the south side of the North Saskatchewan River and loops around on the east side of the campground near the day use area. Campsites are found along the right side of the road facing the river. Recreational areas have been noted to be within the floodplain of the North Saskatchewan River as previous flooding throughout the campground has been noted (D. McCormick, per. comm.). 6.2 Aquatic Ecosystem - North Saskafchewan River The aquatic ecosystem field assessment was limited to the area of the North Saskatchewan River adjacent to the proposed bank protection measures. The aquatic assessment area was approximately 405 meters in length with 7 transects spread throughout the assessment area. On June 2 & 4,2017 the North Saskatchewan River had an average channel width of 167m and an average wetted width of 164m (Table 6.1). The right bank heights ranged from approximately 8m to lOm throughout the assessment area. The water levels were high along the erosional (right) bank which is expected to have the thalweg running along it. Data from the Alberta River Basins database indicates that flow levels in the North Saskatchewan River have been above average this spring, especially so in early June (AEP 2011; Appendix 15.2). Fish habitat along the assessment area, and more specifically, along the eroding right bank consisted of deep water with a gravelly substrate, no instream fish habitat structure was apparent. The river channel braids within the study area, creating an island along the left bank with a maximum width of -375m, this island was vegetated and had large woody debris building up on the west side of the island which would provide fish habitat. No overhanging vegetation was noted on either bank along the river. The eroding right bank provided minimal riparian area and the vegetation width between the river and the road was approximately 20 meters. No fishing effort was conducted during the aquatic assessment due to sufficient existing information (Table 5.5) and taking in consideration of limited instream activity occurring during the project. It would be EnviroMak lnc.#17-18 Page 13 50 F nvrno Environmental Effects Assessment (EA) for Proposed Bank Protection on the North Saskatchewan River T{ullr.* Within Devon, Alberta at W35-50-26-W4M expected that the area would provide habitat for several fish species at several life stages; however no significant or sensitive habitat features were noted. At the time of the assessment, water clarity was poor and consistent with June high water carrying higher suspended sediment loads, detritus and debris. While site specific water quality sampling was not conducted, it could be expected that the eroding bank may contribute sediment to the watercourse during erosional periods. EPCOR monitors turbidity within the North Saskatchewan River at two locations within Edmonton (downstream of the project site). Data is collected every 5 minutes and is available on EPCOR's website for 3 hours. On June 12, 2017, from 1 I :00am to 2:45pm turbidity at the E.L. Smith plant ranged from737.7 NTU to 807.4 NTU; at the Rossdale plant turbidity ranged from 628.1 NTU to 684.3 NTU. The E.L. Smith plant is located in southwest Edmonton and the Rossdale plant is centrally located near downtown Edmonton. (EPCOR 2017). Table 6.1. Morphometric, bed and riparian characteristics associated with the North Saskatchewan River at W35-50-26-W4M on June 2,2017. Transect (T) Parameter T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 Mean ChannelWidth (m) 192 180 177 162 154 152 155 167 WetWidth (m) 192 170 175 157 153 148 150 164 Fish Passage Status NA Fish Habitat (Y/N) NA Bank Left Not measured Height (m) Right I 10 10 10 10 o 8 o Unstable right bank (eroding), cavities in bank along left bank noted. Additional Comments Large woody debris noted piling up on left bank. See Figure 6.1 for transect locations 6.3 Wildlife, Vegetation and Other Valued Ecological Component Suruey Results A vegetation and wildlife ground survey was conducted within the vicinity of the project location between the campground/campground access road and the river. The assessment area consisted of approximately seven vegetation plots (each I 0m x 1 m) along 405m of the right bank (Figure 6. I ). The vegetation survey was intended to identify general species composition, diversity and coverage. The wildlife survey was intended to identify sensitive habitats and movement corridors, dens, burrows, leks, breeding areas, nesting areas and hibemacula as well as to make observations of wildlife presence and activity. Below provides a summary of the survey findings (Table 6.2): l. The area between the campground access road and the North Saskatchewan River was generally unaltered with exception of a small area of bioengineered streambank stabilization (i.e. willow brush EnviroMak lnc.#17-18 Page 14 51 F uvrno Environmental Effects Assessment (EA) for Proposed Bank Protection on the North Saskatchewan River T{urne- Within Devon, Alberta at W35-50-26-W4M layering at the north end ofthe study area) and some concrete rubble protection at the south end ofthe study area. West of the access road, the area has been altered considerably for anthropogenic recreational use (i.e. campground). Vegetation and landscaping in this area was consistent with campground recreational use areas with maintenance of some treed vegetation, sod/grass, graveled areas, buildings and structures. 2. Vegetation plots were delineated at each transect and assessed for general species composition and diversity within each plot. The plant species identified are listed in Table 6.2. The vegetation diversity was generally consistent throughout each plot. Transects 3 and 4 consisted ofmore grasses than the other transects as they were along a grassed section of the right bank. Generally, composition was consistent with river riparian vegetation of the Parkland area. 3. Overall, the study area was well vegetated with no sparsely vegetated areas. Trees were present throughout the assessment area between the top ofthe bank and the access road. The eroding bank itself had little vegetation growth. 4. No noxious weeds were observed within the vegetation plots and overall study area. 5. No native fescue grasslands or rare plant species were noted in the vegetation plots and overall study area. 6. Numerous birds were heard or observed during the survey (Table 6.2). While no investigative search for active nests was conducted, no active nests were observed during the general wildlife survey. Active bank cavities were noted along the left bank; however, this was outside of the expected potential disturbance area. No bird activity was noted along the right bank. 7. No sharp-tailed grouse were observed nor was any lekking habitat or leks. The assessment area did not appear to be highly suitable for sharp{ailed grouse lek habitat particularly considering the adjacent anthropogenic activity. 8. Redtailed hawk was observed during the survey; however, no active raptor nests were noted during the survey. There did appear to be potential raptor habitat in the area. 9. No amphibians were heard or observed during the time of the survey. It is not anticipated that the North Saskatchewan River in the vicinity of the project would provide breeding habitat for amphibian species due to high flow levels. No other potential breeding sites were noted within the study area. Minimal non-breeding amphibian habitat was present in the campground and adjacent areas. 10. No other wildlife and/or unique sensitive habitat and/or wetlands were noted along the assessment area. EnviroMak lnc.*17-18 Page 15 52 Frvrno Environmental Effects Assessmenl (EA) for Proposed Bank Protection on the North Saskatchewan River I{x*rng,- Within Devon, Alberta at W35-50-26-W4M Table 6.2. Vegetation and wildlife identified and/or observed within the study area on June 2,2017 . Parameter Common Name Scientific Name Provincial Status1,2 Aquatic None Observed Veqetation Riparian Prickly Rose Rosa acicularis Secure (Ss/G5) Vegetation Clover Trifolium sp. Generally Exotic (SN,aJGNR) Wild Red Raspberry Rubus idaeus Secure (S5/G5) White Birch Betula papyrifera Secure (S5/G5) Red-Osier Doqwood Cornus stolonifera Secure (S5/G5) Manitoba Maple Acer nequndo Lack of Information (SU/cs) Snowberry Symphoricarpos albus Secure (Ssic5) Balsam Poplar Populus balsamifera Secure (Ss/G5) False Solomon's seal Smilacina racemosa Secure (S5/G5) Silverberry Elaeagnus commutata Secure (Ss/G5) Common Dandelion Taraxacum offlcinale Exotic (SNAJG5) Noxious None observed Weeds Wildlife and Red-tailed Hawk Buteo jamaicensis Secure Wildlife Signs Lincoln's Sparrow Melospiza lincolnii Secure Observed Gray Catbird Dumetella carolinensis Secure Cedar Waxwing Bombycilla cedrorum Secure Clay-colored Soarrow Spizella pallida Secure Song Sparrow Melospiza melodia Secure Spotted Sandpiper Actitis macularia Secure Chipping Sparrow Spizella passerina Secure Tree Swallow Tachycineta bicolor Secure Black-Capped Chickadee Poecile atricapillus Secure American Crow Corvus brachvrhvnchos Secure Yellow Warbler Dendroica petechia Secure American Robin Turdus mioratorius Secure EnviroMak lnc.#17-18 Page '16 53 F nvrno Environmental Effects Assessment (EA) for Proposed Bank Protection on the North Saskatchewan River Jtr|ngrJ-". Within Devon, Alberta at W35-50-26-W4M Riglrt Barrk Leqend T1 r Flow T Transects T1 to T7 Edge of vegetation North Saskatchewan River : \- vI Lefl Bank T6 T a I "; Figure 6.1. Morphometric features and sampling sites associated with the field reconnaissance of the proposed bank protection works on the North Saskatchewan River within W35-50-26-W4M (Google Earth, 2017). EnviroMak lnc.#'17-18 Page 17 54 NVIRO Environmental Effects Assessment (EA) for Proposed Bank Protection on the North Saskatchewan River *[I$":* Within Devon, Alberta at W35-50-26-W4M 7.0 ENGINEERING DESIGN AND CONSTRUGTION PLAN 7.1 Rationale for Activity The North Saskatchewan River right bank protection measures are considered necessary to protect the Devon Lions campground/recreational area and access road. The access road through the recreational area runs parallel to the river bank. A linear length of approximately 100m along the bank has been identified as being in higher risk due to the river bank erosion. 7.2 Overview of Activity The project consists oftwo proposed stages. Stage I involves the installation of permanent upland sheet piling as well as two rock rip rap keys above the waterline at the upstream and downstream ends to stabilize the bank. No wetted instream activity will be required in order to conduct the stabilization works as the sheet piles will be placed adjacent to the existing road in the current upland ground and the riprap keys (clean Class II rock free of fines and silt) will be constructed above the waterline in low flow conditions (i.e. ideally fall). Care would be taken to ensure no bank material falls into the river during excavation above the waterline for the rock keys. Stage 2 involves the placement of a rock apron (clean Class II rock free of fines and silt) at the toe of the installed sheet piling when needed as indicated by annual monitoring of expected continued bank erosion. It is anticipated that stage 2 may require limited instream works (placement of clean rock; no excavation); however, this would be dependent on water levels at the time of construction. Again, low flow conditions would be targeted for construction timing to limit instream activity. The rock apron would be intended to prevent undermining of the sheet piling once the current bank between the river flow and the sheet piling has been eroded. Timing for stage 2 is variable and dependent upon future flood event frequency and intensity, ice movement/jamming, and general river flows. Several desigrr options were evaluated with consideration of feasibility, durability and applicability, environmental impact, regulatory permitting requirements, and cost. In this regard, the selected staged design consisted of the least environmental impact. Further details are provided in the Engineer Design Plan (Appendix 15.3). 7.3 Tentative Schedule and Activity Duration Stage 1 is planned to commence in the fall/winter of 201712018. The activity is expected to occur during the Restricted Activity Period (RAP) for fisheries; however, no instream work is required for this stage, and, therefore, work could proceed at any time. Stage 2 will occur on an as needed basis depending on the rate of erosion on the bank as determined during annual monitoring. Should this work be proposed to occur within the fisheries RAP (September l6 - July EnviroMak lnc.#17-18 Page 18 55 HVIRO Environmental Effects Assessment (EA) for Proposed Bank Protection on the North Saskatchewan River *!(Ir** Wthin Devon, Alberta at W35-50-26-W4M 31), a Qualified Aquatic Environmental Specialist (QAES) will conduct an evaluation of the construction plan with consideration of site conditions and aquatic ecosystem at the time of proposed construction to provide a time specific aquatic ecosystem protection plan to support construction. 7.4 Disturbance Quantification Potential terrestrial disturbance for activity (i.e. access, laydown) is expected to be confined to pre- developed access and previously cleared areas. Minimal new permanent terrestrial disturbance (i.e. clearing of vegetation) is expected. Temporary disturbance to the pre-developed access, laydown and workspace terrestrial areas would be restored to pre-disturbance conditions and,/or as determined by the proponent and municipality. The sheet pile structure and associated tie backs/anchoring itself will leave minimal footprint on the surface landscape. The total length of the sheet pile is expected to be approximately 97.5m. Potential aquatic disturbance is limited to the Stage I upstream and downstream rock keys and the Stage 2 rock toe apron. The Stage 1 upstream and downstream rock keys are expected to be installed above the waterline at low flow conditions. No instream access will be required to install the rock keys which would occur from the top of bank and/or upland area. Each rock key would start above the water line and work up the bank and would consist of a 4m by 4m trench being dug to a depth of approximately 3m. Class II rock would be installed into each trench as per the engineering design notes (Appendix 15.3). The total surface area of the rock keys is expected to consist of 16m2 (upstream key) plus 16m2 (downstream key) for a total of approximately 32m2 of bank area above the base/low flow water level. Any temporary unexpected disturbance for access to install the rock keys would be restored to pre-disturbance condition. The Stage 2 rock rip rap toe apron would be placed at the toe of the sheet pile at such time that the bank between the sheet pile and the current river water flow is eroded. The rock toe apron would consist of a maximum of 4.5m wide (lm depth) of Class II rip rap rock being placed on what is currently land/bank area that may eventually be expected to be eroded. Should the rock toe apron be required for the entire length of sheet pile protection, the total estimated surface area may include 438.75m2. The clean rock rip rap would likely be installed from the roadway or upland top of bank area with no instream excavation. Any temporary unexpected disturbance for access to install the rock keys would be restored to pre- disturbance condition. EnviroMak lnc.#17-18 Page 19 56 F nvrno Environmental Effects Assessment (EA) for Proposed Bank Protection on the North Saskatchewan River Tvl *rlrq- Within Devon, Alberta at W35-50-26-W4M 8.0 POTENTIALENV!RONMENTALEFFECTS 8.1 Construction Activities with Potential Environmental Effects Based on information available at the time of assessment, the activities that could have potential environmental effects may include but are not limited to: (a) temporary access for construction; (b) site preparation for the bank protection; (c) bank alteration during the activity; and, (d) general construction activity (i.e. refuelling, garbage storage, vehicular and equipment traffic, etc.). 8.2 Potential Effects on Terrestrial Ecosystem Some potential wildlife and terrestrial effects as a result of this activity including but not limited to: o direct wildlife mortalities (i.e. destruction of migratory birds); o alteration, disruption and destruction of wildlife habitat due to use; o contamination and spread of invasive species and noxious weeds; and, o cumulative effects. 8.3 Potential Effects on Aquatic Ecosystem Some potential aquatic environmental effects may arise as a result of the project including but not limited to: o Serious harm to fish and the habitat that supports those fish (e.g.; fish habitat alteration, disruption or destruction; fish passage barrier; etc.); o Alteration, disruption or destruction of amphibian habitat; o Fish and amphibian mortalities from water management/handling/withdrawal; . Sedimentation or contamination; o Sedimentation and/or contamination of the watercourse as a result of equipment access near and in the watercourse o Sedimentation and/or contamination of the watercourse area a result of upland access and laydown activity o Contamination of the watercourse due to general contaminant mishandling (i.e. refuelling) EnviroMak lnc.#17-'18 Page 20 57 NVIRO Environmental Effects Assessment (EA) for Proposed Bank Protection on the North Saskatchewan River AK Inc. Within Devon, Alberta at W35-50-26-W4M o Introduction/spread of invasive species and/or noxious weeds due to improper equipment cleaning prior to access o Cumulative effects. 8.4 Other Potential Effects Without mitigation, some additional potential effects could arise as a result of the project. The following environmental effects may include, but are not limited to: a) Public Safety and Navigation b) Contractor Safety and Environmental Incident Prevention and Response c) Historical Resources 8.5 Potential Effects Significance Summary Most of the potential effects would be considered temporary and limited, and mitigation measures could be effective in addressing effects. Table 8.1 provides the effects significance matrix without application of mitigation measures. EnviroMak lnc.#17-18 Page 21 58 NVIRO Environmental Effects Assessment (EA) for Proposed Bank Protection on the North Saskatchewan River AK Inc. Within Devon, Alberta at W35-50-26-W4M Table 8.1. Significance of potential environmental effects resulting from the proposed bank protection project in the North Saskatchewan River at W35-50-26-W4M, without mitigation. Significance (High, Moderate, Low, Zero) Project Activity Potential Effect Geographic Duration Severity Probability Extent Water Quality Sedimentation and contamination L L M M and Hydrology Surface flow/drainage alteration 0-L 0-L 0-L 0-L Fish habitat alteration 0-L 0-L 0-L 0-L Fish and Fish Direct fish mortalities Habitat- 0-L 0-L 0-L 0-L Restricted fish passage 0-L 0-L 0-L 0-L Direct wildlife mortalities L L L L Alteration and disruption of wildlife Wildlife L L L L movement (Mammals and Alteration, disruption and destruction of Birds) L L L L wildlife habitat Contaminant spills L H M M Direct amphibian mortalities L L L L Amphibians Amphibian habitat alteration 0-L 0-L 0-L 0-L Temporary removal of vegetation for L L L M workspace and access Vegetation lntroduction of noxious weeds and L L M M invasive species Public Safety and Risk to public safety during active L L L M Naviqation construction period Historical Alteration, disruption and destruction of L L L L Resources historical resources isignificance considers Stage I construction methodology ofno instream work, reassessment ofeffects may be required for Stage 2 H-High M-Moderate L-Low l-Zero Duration: The length oftime that the environmental effect occurs: Severity: The expected degree of change to the aquatic and terrestrial Zero (0): No impact on the population or habitat base. resources: Lot (L): Impact is expected to last less than l0 years. Zero (0): No impact on the population or habitat base. Moderate (M): Impactthatlastsbetween 10-25years. Low (L) : lffects less than I 0% of the population or habitat base. High (H): lmpact that extends more than 25 years. Moderate (M): Affects 10-25% ofthe population or habitat base. High (H): Affects greater th an 25Yo of the population or habitat base. Geographic Extent: The area affected by the impact: Probability: The likelihood that an impact will occur. Zero (0): No impact on the population or habitat base. Zero (0): No impact on the population or habitat base. Low (L): Impact occurs on the footprint only. Low (L) : Low likelihood of occurrence during the life of the project. Moderate (M): Impact occurs off the footprint and Moderate (M): Expected to occur infrequently during the life of immediately adjacent to the footprint. the project. High (H): Impact extends downstream or upstream of the footprint. High (H): Almost certain to occur during the Iife ofthe project. EnviroMak lnc.#17-18 Page 22 59 HVIRO Environmental Effects Assessment (EA) for Proposed Bank Protection on the North Saskatchewan River AK Inc. Within Devon, Alberta at W35-50-26-W4M 9.0 MITIGATION AND RESIDUAL EFFECTS For environmental mitigation purposes, the following action(s) should be considered: 9.1 ConstructionTiming 9.1.1 Aquatic Ecosystem Timing The Restricted Activity Period for fisheries of this Class C watercourse is from September l6 to July 31. Ideally, any instream work should be planned to occur outside of the RAP; however, in light of the construction methodology for Stage I (no instream work required) construction during this time could be conducted. Should the construction methodology change and/or should Stage 2 be initiated, additional evaluation would occur to determine acceptability for work within the RAP. 9.1.2 Terrestrial Ecosystem Timing As the fall and/or winter timing of project is expected to avoid the nesting periods of birds (February l5 - August 3l), vegetation removal and river bank disturbance would not require an assessment. Should vegetation removal be required within the bird nesting period assessment and guidance by a qualified biologist and/or ornithologist under applicable provincial research licences/permits would be required. 9.1.3 Environmental Restricted Activity Periods and Setback Distances Based on the existing information review, some timing restrictions may be applicable to activity at this location (Table 9.1). Table 9.1. Potential restricted activity timing and setback distances identified at W35-50-26-W4M. Restricted Activity Restriction Setback Distance CommentsT Period2,3,4 A pre-disturbance nest survey Species and approximately less than 72 hours (but no Nesting Owls, Raptors February 15 -August disturbance level greater than 7 days) prior to the start of and Migratory Birds. 31 dependent construction required if clearing to occur durinq restricted timinq period. 1'2Sharp-tailed Grouse March 1Sth_June 15th 3500m from Leks No lek habitat at p@ect location. No Survey Area June 16th - March 14th 3100m from Leks further survey required. 31000m from nesting A pre-disturbance nest survey March 1Sth July 1Sth - sites approximately less than 72 hours (but no l,2Sensitive Raptor greater than 7 days) prior to the start of Range 3100m from nesting July 16th - March 14th construction is required to identify sites sensitivities and apply applicable setbacks. Stage 'l work can occur at anytime. Stage 2 work to be evaluated by QAES 3 North Saskatchewan September 16 July - Bed and Banks when timing known. River (C) 31 See relevant report sections for recommendations. 2Grassland and/or December 16 July 31 Within reqion - No fescue grasslands noted at project Parkland Natural Year-round Within region location. No further survey required. Region EnviroMak lnc.#17-18 Page 23 60 NVIRO Environmental Effects Assessment (EA) for Proposed Bank Protection on the North Saskatchewan River &LIler Wthin Devon, Alberta at W35-S0-26-W4M Restricted Activity Restriction Setback Distance CommentsT Period2,3'4 Prior to construction commencing if within 2Other Sensitive and restricted period, a ground level wildlife Endangered Species survey should be conducted to ensure that no nesting grassland bird species (Short-eared Owl, 100m from nesting are Aprill-July15 present within Mountain Plover, sites the setback distance if Upland Sandpiper, & activity to occur during restricted timing. Sprague's Pipit) Stage 1 timing expected to avoid restricted timing period so no further survey required for Stage 1. TFWMTS (2017) 2AER LAT Tool - generated,May 17,2017 3Alberta Water Act Code of Practice for Watercourse Crossing Maps (Red Deer 2006) aRecommended Land Use Guidelines for Protection of Selected Wildlife Species and Habitat within Grassland and parkland Natural Regions of Alberta (201l) Sensitive Species Inventory Guidelines (AEP 2013) 9.2 Aquatic Ecosystem 9.2.1 Water Quality and Hydrology The nature of the bank protection work itself is expected to reduce overall erosion and sedimentation of the footprint. That being said, the bank erosion protection will require implementation of mitigation measures to prevent and/or minimize effects to water quality and hydrology. Sedimentation and contamination into adjacent fish-bearing waters is a concem. The unmitigated potential significance of the effects from sedimentation and/or contamination could be high. To ensure that there will be no adverse effects, the actions described below should be undertaken and implemented. 9.2.1.1 Contingency lnstream lsolation Stage I - Isolating the work site is not proposed nor required as the construction methodology for Stage 1 requires no instream construction. Should risk of sedimentation be observed in association with the activity, methods may be implemented to mitigate the effects of the construction works. Monitoring for total suspended sediment (TSS) and/or turbidity as an indicator of TSS may be conducted upstream and downstream to ensure the relevant Guidelines are being met. The monitoring plan further defines the need for such effort. Stage 2 - When Stage 2 planning is initiated and construction timing is being determined, need for work area isolation will be evaluated by the QAES. Based on installation of clean rock with no excavation below the waterline, instream work area isolation may likely not be necessary for Stage 2 either. As a contingency, a downstream turbidity curtain installed in a half V configuration to capture the backwater area, may be installed under the guidance of a QAES monitor subject to site conditions at the time of installation. Stage 1 and 2 - Inspection of the rock material by a Qualified Aquatic Environmental Specialist prior to installation should be undertaken to ensure the material is clean and free of silt/fines. EnviroMak lnc.#17-18 Page 24 61 Fuvrno Environmental Effects Assessment (EA) for Proposed Bank Protection on the North Saskatchewan River T{urns,- Within Devon, Alberta at W35-50-26-W4M 9.2.1.2 Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Temporary erosion protection associated with the construction will be field fit under the guidance of a Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Professional (CPESC). As limited disturbance to soils is expected, limited measures for erosion control are expected to be necessary. However, should unexpected disturbance occur, the installation of the erosion control devices should occur as soon as possible after the disturbance and landscaping is complete. Further, some contingency erosion control materials and devices should be on-site during construction to protect against heavy erosion should a rainstorm event occur at a vulnerable time. Having such materials on hand would reduce the possibility of extensive sedimentation of the watercourse in the event of such a major rainfall. Often the greatest potential for harm from sedimentation occurs when the soils are bare and construction is occurring orjust completed; hence, preparation for natural events is very desirable. In this regard, some silt fence and coir log, straw waddles or straw bales are recommended to be on site particularly during the Stage I excavation ofthe rock key trenches. Work should be paused during inclement weather. 9.2.1.3 Contaminant, Deleterious Substances and lnvasive Species Standard procedures for storing, refueling, handling and monitoring possible contaminants should be followed. In case of a spill, overflow or release of fluid due to equipment or hose failure, the situation will be controlled in a practical and safe manner. Equipment should be refueled and serviced to ensure that deleterious substances do not enter any watercourse (normally at least l00m from the watercourse). Equipment operating near any watercourse should be clean and free ofexternal oil, grease, mud, or fluid leaks. Fuel should be stored at least l00m away from watercourses unless special provisions/containment devices are installed. All waste materials should be disposed of above the high water mark and located such that they do not re-enter any water body. It should be noted in this particular location that the roadway and anthropogenic activities are within the l00m precautionary setback. As such, secondary containment should be utilized for contaminant handling and refuelling as such activities may be expected to occur within the 100m setback. A fuel/deleterious substance spill response plan should be in place and an emergency spill response kit be kept on-site during construction. Appropriate precautions should be taken to ensure that deleterious substances will not be placed in any location where the materials may enter a watercourse. The worksite and equipment should be inspected daily to ensure no leaks are occurring. All equipment that is to be used will be free of aquatic and terrestrial invasive species. Appropriate inspections and reporting should be conducted to ensure that effective management of contaminants is achieved. Any contaminants released into the environment especially surface waters EnviroMak lnc.#'l7-18 Page 25 62 Fnvrno Environmental Effects Assessment (EA) for Proposed Bank Protection on the North Saskatchewan River T{rur"lrq,- Within Devon, Alberta at W35-50-26-W4M should be reported to Alberta Environment and Parks, municipality as may be required and the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (if into the North Saskatchewan River or fish-bearing watercourse). 9.2.2 Fish and Fish Habitat Considering the nature ofthe design and construction plan specifications, no perrnanent loss offish habitat, no significant temporary disturbance to fish habitat and no serious harm to fish and the habitat that support those fish are expected. As such, fish habitat offsetting is not recommended. The Stage I activities will be confined to upland and or above waterline areas and, therefore, are not expected to temporarily or permanently alter fish habitat andlor cause serious harm to fish and the habitat that support those fish. Stage 2 rock toe apron installation may involve the placement of clean rock rip rap along the sheet pile toe. However, the area of placement would consist of current bank/land area which would be newly eroded. As such, fish habitat in this potential area would be expected to be very poor. The rock itself would serve to enhance and create new fish habitat by providing cover and surface roughness along with potential resting area in the erosional zone. The overall intention ofthe project to protect the bank from erosion is a benefit to fish and fish habitat of the North Saskatchewan River. Fish passage is not expected to be impeded, constricted or blocked considering the design and overall project. No fish rescue or fish handling is expected to be required in association with the proposed activities. It is not expected that dewatering/pumping from the watercourse will be required for this activity; however, should pumping be required, the construction design will require appropriate screening of water intakes to ensure that fish species being small sized and having anguilliform swimming characteristics are not subjected to high mortalities. To address the question ofeffective screening, the standards developed in "Freshwater Intake End-of-Pipe Fish Screen Guideline" (DFO 1995) are used. 9.3 TerrestrialEcosystem 9.3.1 Wildlife Clearance to remove vegetation during the nesting periods of birds (approximately February 15 to August 31 of any given year) would require the assessment by a qualified biologist and/or ornithologist. Additional mitigation measures and/or pre-construction surveys for wildlife are indicated in Table 9.1. 9.3.2 Soils and Vegetation The introduction of noxious weeds with contractor equipment and seed materials is a concern. If noxious weeds are observed, they should be controlled and/or removed as part of the Weed Control Act and as per EnviroMak lnc.#17-18 Page 26 63 F xvrno Environmental Efiects Assessment (EA) for Proposed Bank Protection on the North Saskatchewan River T{rr$g,.- Wthin Devon, Alberta at W35-50-26-W4M the direction of the local Agricultural fieldperson. Monitoring post-construction re-vegetation for noxious weeds is recommended. It is recommended that the disturbance to soils be minimized and that the area of disturbance be sufficiently restored so as to prevent erosion and sedimentation. This may involve the use of erosion control devices as well as the seeding ofdisturbed areas and protection ofexisting trees/shrubs and/or planting ofadditional shrubs/trees. Should disturbance occur, exposed areas associated with the activity should be restored immediately following the completion ofthe works. The required restoration procedures will be determined by the onsite environmental monitor at the time of construction. All seed mixes shall consist of native species and be free of weeds. The success of the revegetation should be monitored, and, in areas where vegetation did not appear to grow, there should be re-seeding. The general approach should be to simulate or restore the existing conditions and/or enhance and stabilize areas such as eroding and/or disturbed banks. The major outcome is to ensure that soils are held intact with sufficient roots from all vegetation types consequently minimizing erosion. Vegetation coverage of 85% over every disturbed area following one full growing season is the target. 9.4 General Construction Activity The proponent (contractor) should be familiar with and have present on the jobsite the specific environmental permits, licenses, approvals and authorizations issued by the govemment regulators. Any disturbance to aquatic and terrestrial resources during construction will be minimized. 9.5 Public Safety and Navigation The activity is not expected to impede waterway navigation and/or boater traffic and/or access to the watercourse. However, in Stage 2 some signage may be recommended upstream and downstream of the project to warn users of the activity depending upon the timing of construction (i.e. if winter timing occurs, then signage may not be necessary). Signage and/or perimeter control for public safety upland, may be recommended during construction. 9.6 Contractor Safety and Environmental lncident Prevention and Response The Contractor should adhere to the mitigation measures indicated in this report. Further, it is recommended that the contractor have an Environmental Incident Prevention and Response Plan (or similar equivalent plan). 9.7 HistoricalResources Should archaeological, paleontological and/or historical resources be encountered during activity, the activity should be paused and Alberta Culture and Tourism should be notified prior to further activity. EnviroMak lnc.#17-18 Page 27 64 NVIRO Environmental Effects Assessment (EA) for Proposed Bank Protection on the North Saskatchewan River 15,Il-c":* Within Devon, Alberta at W35-50-26-W4M 9.8 Potential Effects with Mitigation Significance Summary With appropriate mitigation and monitoring for the various project activities, long-term residual effects are not expected (Table 9.2). Table 9.2. Significance of potential environmental effects resulting from the proposed bank protection on the North Saskatchewan River at W35-50-26-W4M, with mitigation. Significance (High, Moderate, Low, Zero) Residual Project Effect Potential Effect Geographic Activity Duration Severity Probability Extent Water Quality Sedimentation and contamination L L L L 0 and Hvdroloqy Surface flow/drainage alteration 0 0 0 0 0 Fish habitat alteration 0 0 0 0 0 Fish and Fish Direct fish mortalities 0-L 0-L 0-L 0-L 0 Habitat Restricted fish passage 0 0 0 0 0 Direct wildl ife mortalities L L L L 0 Alteration and disruption of wildlife Wildlife L L L L 0 movement (Mammals Alteration, disruption and destruction and Birds) 0-L 0-L 0-L 0-L 0 of wildlife habitat Contaminant spills L L L L 0 Direct amphibian mortalities 0-L 0-L 0-L 0-L 0 Amphibians Amphibian habitat alteration 0-L 0-L 0-L 0-L 0 Temporary removal of vegetation for 0-L 0-L 0-L 0-L 0 workspace and access Vegetation lntroduction of noxious weeds and L L L L 0 invasive species Public Safety Risk to public safety during active and L L L L 0 construction period Naviqation Contractor Risk to contractor safety during active L L L L 0 SafeW construction period Historical Alteration, disruption and destruction L L L L 0 Resources of historical resources H - High M - Moderate L-Low 0 -Zero Duration: The length oftime that the environmental effect occurs: Severity: The expected degree of change to the aquatic and Zero (0): No impact on the population or habitat base. terrestrial resources: Lov (L): Impact is expected to last less than l0 years. Zero (0): No impact on the population or habitat base. Moderate (M): Impact that lasts between l0-25 years. Lon (L): lffects less than l0% ofthe population or habitat High (H): Impact that extends more than 25 years. base. Moderate (M) : Affects 10-25% of the population or habitat base. Geographic Extent: The area affected by the impact: High (H): Affects geater than25o/o of the population or habitat Zero (0): No impact on the population or habitat base. base. Lott (L): Impact occurs on the footprint only. Moderate (M): lmpact occurs and immediately adjacent offthe fooprint Probability: The likelihood that an impact will occur: to the footprint. Zero (0): No impact on the population or habitat base. High (H): Impact extends downstream orupstream ofthe footprint. Low (L): Low likelihood of occurrence during the life of the project. Moderate (M): Expected to occur infrequently during the life ofthe project. High (H): Almost certain to occur during the life of the project. EnviroMak lnc.#17-18 Page 28 65 Fnvrno Environmental Effects Assessment (EA) for Proposed Bank Protection on the North Saskatchewan River Tvlulr-.- Within Devon, Alberta at W35-50-26-W4M 1O.O MONITORING PLAN 10.1 Stage 1 The following are recommendations for monitoring of stage I with regarding to the proposed bank protection works. 1. Considering the expected fall timing for construction (post-August 3l), a breeding bird nesting survey would not be required prior to any clearing or construction; however, a survey for raptors should be conducted a recommended maximum of 72 hours (and no greater than 7 days) prior to any clearing if clearing is to occur. 2. As flows are expected to be present in the North Saskatchewan River, monitoring by a QAES or environmental practitioner is recommended for any activity that may cause sedimentation particularly during the rock key installations. The QAES would determine the need for turbidity and/or total suspended sediment sampling at that time. 3. Equipment operating in or near the watercourse will be inspected for leaks and appropriate use of contaminant containment structures and refueling distances. 4. Monitoring for potential temporary stream bank erosion and disruption or alteration of riparian vegetation will be undertaken to ensure that any temporarily disturbed areas are restored to pre- disturbance condition following construction activities as well as to ensure effective temporary erosion and sediment control during construction. Erosion and sediment control devices will be installed as field fit as well as upon guidance from the environmental monitor. Verification that the aquatic ecosystem has been returned to equivalent and/or better capability will occur as part ofthe post-disturbance assessment. 5. A post-construction assessment of the site approximately 1 year following construction may be necessary to ensure that re-vegetation success targets (85% vegetation coverage of disturbed areas) are achieved and to verify effectiveness and for maintenance oferosion and sediment control devices. 6. Photographic evidence of the worksite prior to, during and after construction and any associated environmental monitoring documentation should be obtained and maintained in the proponent files in the case ofregulatory audit. 7. Some regulatory permitting may require written documentation. In this case, a written monitoring report should be prepared and submitted to those regulatory agencies that require such documentation. The written monitoring report should include appropriate information to meet the expectations of the regulator. EnviroMak lnc.#17-18 Page 29 66 Fnvrno Environmenlal Effects Assessment (EA) for Proposed Bank Protection on the North Saskatchewan River ft4 ax r".. Wthin Devon. Alberta at W35-50-26-W4M 10.2 Stage 2 Recommendations for monitoring ofstage 2 will be provided by the QAES along with the QAES evaluation to capture time specific conditions once construction timing planning begins. EnviroN4ak lnc.#17-18 Page 30 67 Fnvrno Environmental Effects Assessment (EA) for Proposed Bank Protection on the North Saskatchewan River T*ttr$e- Within Devon, Alberta at W35-50-26-W4M 11.0 REGULATORY PERMITTING Watercourse bank erosion protection is regulated and guided by various legislation, guidelines and regulations some of which are listed below according to jurisdiction. 11.1 Federal The following is a list of the key potentially applicable federal legislation. o Fisheries (Canada) Act o Migratory Bird Convention Act . Species At Risk Act o Canadian Environmental Assessment Act o Novigotion Protection Act 11.2 Provincial The following is a list of the key potentially applicable provincial legislation and codes of practice. o Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act o ll'ater Acl and associated Codes of Practice o Wetland Policy o Public Lands Act o Fisheries Act o lltildlife Act o Historical Resources Act o Weed Control Act and Weed Control Regulation o Occupational Health and Safety Act 11.3 Municipal Various municipal bylaws and/or County approvals may apply. The site specific and applicable required legislative and/or approval processes are addressed in the next section. EnviroMak lnc.#17-18 Page 3'l 68 NVIRO Environmental Effects Assessment (EA) for Proposed Bank Protection on the North Saskatchewan River ll("It19:." Within Devon, Alberta at W35-50-26-W4M 11.4 Regulatory Scoping Results Based on the existing information review in regards to regulatory approvals and expectations, the following regulatory processes are expected to apply to the activity: l. Federal, Department of Fisheries and Oceans - As per the self-assessment tool provided by the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) and based on determination by the biologist that all pathways of effects can be avoided and/or mitigated and that no serious harm to fish (and the habitat that support those fish) will occur as a result of this activity, no further review or authorization is necessary from DFO. However, it may be recommended that the proposal be submitted for Request for Review by DFO to mitigate liabilities and risks on the proponent. 2. Federal, Transport Canada - As the NSR is a Scheduled Watercourse as per the Navigation Protection lcl, Notice of Works/Approval for the instream erosion repairs may be required; however, the activity appears to meet the Erosion-protection works minor works order of the Navigation Protection Act and would likely not required a Notice of Works/Approval. The project specifications should be vetted with Transport Canada to verify this conclusion. 3. Provincial, Alberta Environment and Parks, Water Act - Approval under the Water Act is required for the proposed bank protection works (Appendix 15.4). 4. Provincial, Alberta Environment and Parks, Public Lands Act - A disposition under the Alberta Environment and Parks (AEP) Public Londs Act will be required for any permanent portion of the works within the bed and shore ofthe watercourse. Any temporary works on crown owned lands would require a Temporary Field Authorization (TFA). 5. Private Landowners and/or Municipality - Agreements associated with private landowners and/or the municipality may apply. This should be vetted as part of the project planning. 6. Alberta Environment and Parks (AEP) research permits are required for wildlife surveys, fish inventories and fish rescues. The environmental practitioner conducting the surveys/rescues would handle the procurement of these permits. 7. Various other municipal, provincial and federal legislation/regulations/guidelines and expectations are addressed in the mitigation measures, monitoring and best management practices. This may include Town of Devon bylaws which should be adhered to as applicable. Please note that the regulatory guidelines, protocols and processes are dynamic, and therefore, subject to change. EnviroMak lnc.#17-18 Page 32 69 I{VIRO Environmental Effects Assessment (EA) for Proposed Bank Protection on the North Saskatchewan River AK fnc, Within Devon, Alberta at W35-50-26-W4M 12.0 CONCLUSIONS This existing information review, field data collection and environmental effects assessment outline the potential environmental sensitivities and required mitigation measures to construct the bank protection with minimal potential impact. Based on the environmental assessment, the following conclusions are offered. The North Saskatchewan River is designated a Class C waterbody with a restricted activity period (RAP) for fisheries between September l6 and July 31. Considering no instream work is required to complete the Stage I works, construction may proceed in low flow conditions at any time once regulatory permitting is obtained. Stage 2 timing for the fisheries restricted activity period (RAP) would be evaluated by a QAES once construction planning is initiated at the time that Stage 2 is determined to be necessary. 2. No Species at Risk or sensitive, rare or endangered species and/or sensitive or unique VECs or habitats were present that would not be mitigatable or avoidable with consideration of the selected engineering design and construction plan. 3. Best management practices and mitigation measures for various ecological components including but not limited to wildlife and vegetation, fish and fish habitat, erosion and sediment control, minimization of disturbance and restoration are recommended in this report. Mitigation and monitoring are required to ensure there are no permanent ecological impacts and/or residual environmental effects as a result of the project. 4. Some regulatory permitting, as detailed in the report, is required to permit this activity. The activities should not proceed until permitting is obtained. 5. Based on the existing information review, field reconnaissance, proposed engineering design and construction plan and proposed mitigation and monitoring, no residual effects and no permanent alteration or net loss ofthe aquatic and terrestrial resources are expected as a result ofthe proposed bank protection. EnviroMak lnc.#17-18 Page 33 70 Fuvrno Environmental Effects Assessment (EA) for Proposed Bank Protection on the North Saskatchewan River T{urrq- Within Devon, Alberta at W35-50-26-W4M 13.0 LIMITATIONS AND CLOSURE In conducting the assessment and rendering our conclusions, EnviroMak gives the benefit of its best judgment based on its experience and in accordance with generally accepted professional standards for this type of assessment in present time. This report was submitted with the best information to date and on the information provided. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the proponent/client. Any use which any other third party makes of this report, or any reliance on or decisions to be made on it, are the responsibility of such third parties. EnviroMak accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any other third party as a result of decisions made or actions based on this report. Please contact EnviroMak Inc. by telephone at (780) 425-2461(office) or email to [email protected] with any questions or concerns. Sincerely, rl.,yff*t* Suzie Ramler, B.Sc. Junior Biologist, EnviroMak Inc & P A d ,u4 A F- 7, Katie Thompson, B.Sc., P. Biol., QAES, CPESC CPESC Biologist, EnviroMak Inc. & No. n?g P Kyla Walker-Makowecki, M.Sc., QAES, CPESC Principal, EnviroMak Inc. 2 CPESC K$a \rYalker.Makowrcli No,7651 EnviroMak lnc.#17-'18 Page 34 71 NVIRO Environmental Effects Assessment (EA) for Proposed Bank Protection on the North Saskatchewan River AK Inc. Within Devon, Alberta at W35-50-26-W4M 14.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY Alberta Conservation Information Management System, Parks Division, Alberta Tourism, Parks and Recreation. 2017 . ACIMS Database - Element Occurrence Report. Data Accessed May 17,2017 Alberta Culture and Tourism . 2017 . Listing of Historic Resources (April 201 7 Edition). Alberta Enerry Regulator & Alberta Environment and Parks. Landscape Analysis Tool Report. Report Generated on May 17,2017 . Alberta Environment. 2001. Administrative Guide for Approvals to Protect Surface Water Bodies under the Water Act. Queen's Printer for Alberta. Edmonton, Alberta. Alberta Environment and Parks. 2017. Alberta River Basins. Accessed June 72, 2017. http ://www. env i ronment.alberta.calapps/basins/Default.aspx Alberta Environment and Parks. 2015. Alberta Merged Wetland Inventory Dataset. Alberta Environment and Parks. 2010. Colonial Nesting Birds Digital Dataset Alberta Environment and Parks. 2006. Code of Practice for Watercourse Crossings; Water Act - Water (Ministerial Regulation). Consolidated to include amendments in force as of 2013/06/24. Queen's Printer for Alberta. Edmonton, Alberta. 44 pp. Alberta Soil Information Centre. 2016. Alberta Soil Names File (Generation 4) User's Handbook. M.D. Bock (ed.). Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Science and Technology Branch, Edmonton, AB. l66pp. Derlukewich, S. Fish of Alberta - Field Identification Key. EPCOR. 20 I 7. Raw Water Turbidity Data. Accessed June 12, 2017 . https://www.epcor.com/products- s ervi ces/water/water-qual ity/Pages/water-turbi dity. aspx Fiera (Fiera Biological Consulting Ltd.).2014. Environmentally Significant Areas of Alberta: 2014 Update. Report prepared for the Government of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta. Fiera Biological Consulting Report Number 1305. Pp. 51. Fish and Wildlife Management Information System Internet Mapping Framework. 2017. Fish and wildlife public site. Accessed May, 2017. GeoDiscover Alberta Map Viewer.2017 . Accessed May 2017 . Government of Alberta.20l7. Alberta Wild Species General Status Listing-2015. Government of Canada. 2017. Historical Hydrometric Data. Government of Canada. 2017. Species at Risk Public Registry A to Z Species Index. http://www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.calsar/index/default e.cfm Government of Alberta. 2016. Habitat Suitability lndices (HSI) By ATS Parcel Identification. Version 2.2. Government of Alberta. 2014. Environmentally Significant Areas (ESAs) in Alberta: 2014 Update. I :1,000,000 Map produced by Parks Division, Alberta Tourism, Parks and Recreation. Government of Alberta.20ll. Recommended Land Use Guidelines for Protection of Selected Wildlife Species and Habitat within Grassland and Parkland Natural Regions of Alberta. app. [Pdf.] Government of Alberta. 2005. 2005 Natural Regions and Subregions of Alberta. Alberta Environment and Parks Division. Government of Canada. 201 l. Species at Risk Act. S.C. 2002, c.29. Assentedto 2002-12-12. EnviroMak lnc.#17-18 Page 35 72 NVIRO Environmental Effects Assessment (EA) for Proposed Bank Protection on the North Saskatchewan River AK Inc. Within Devon, Alberta at W35-50-26-W4M Langhorne, A.L., M. Neufeld, G. Hoar, V. Bourhis, D.A. Fernet, and C. K. Minns. 2001. Life History Characteristics Of Freshwater Fishes Occurring In Manitoba, Saskatchewan, and Alberta, with Major Emphasis On Lake Habitat Requirements. Prepared for Department of Fisheries and Oceans. McCormick. D. Devon Lions Club. Personal communication. May 2017. Paetz,M.J., and J. S. Nelson. 1992. The Fishes of Alberta. 2nd Edition. The University of Alberta Press. Sherwood Park.438 p. Province of Alberta. 2014. Public Lands Act of Alberta. Edmonton, Alberta. Province of Alberta. 2010. Weed Control (Alberta) Regulation. As filed under the Weed Control (Alberta) Act. Statutes of Alberta Chapter W-5.1. Queen's Printer. Edmonton, Alberta. Province of Alberta. 2010. Weed Control (Alberta) Act. Statutes of Alberta Chapter W-5.1. Queen's Printer. Edmonton, Alberta. Originally published 2008. Current as of June 17,2010. Province of Alberta. 2000. Water (Alberta) Act. Province of Alberta. 1997. Wildlife Regulation. Chapter/Regulation: 143/1997. Edmonton, Alberta. 242 p. Province of Alberta. 1994. Environmental Protection and Enhancement of Alberta. Edmonton, Alberta. Province ofAlberta. 1984. Wildlife Act. Edmonton, Alberta. Tetra Tech (TT) EBA. 201 6. Riverbank Assessment (Rev 1). Lions Park Campground Devon , Alberta. 27 pp. Walker-Makowecki, K. L. 2005. Turbidity monitoring for aquatic ecosystem assessment and its applicability to mine tailings management and watercourse crossing construction. Masters of Science Thesis. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. University of Alberta. Walker-Makowecki, K.L.2017. EnviroMak Inc., Principal. Personal Communications. EnviroMak lnc.#17-18 Page 36 73 NVIRO Environmental Effects Assessment (EA) for Proposed Bank Prolection on the North Saskatchewan River AK InC, Within Devon. Alberta at W35-50 26-W4M 15.0 APPENDICES EnviroMak lnc.#l7-18 Page 37 74 1 5.1 Pre-disturbance Site Photographs EnviroMak Inc.#17-18 75 -n\ ,qJ et# v.F l: Photograph 1. Facing north from Transect I (53.362110o, -113.706538') across the North Saskatchewan River on June 2,2017 ,, : 'I ' :r't' .1ir 1 \,' tt r( .."1t \ &' tl" ia . Lr" i'! \+T ( * ', { .}' It' Ir Photograph 2. Facing north from T2 (53.361659o, -113.706515') across North Saskatchewan River on June 2,2017 . EnviroMak lnc.#17-'18 76 ,l Photograph 3. Facing northeast from T2 along North Saskatchewan River on June 2,2017 .,,- -,r"1" .&&SSIA & ' 5l1t i, Itttp otr E ( Photograph 4. Facing east from T3 (53.361015o, -1 13.706438") along North Saskatchewan River on June 2,2017 . EnviroMak lnc.#17-18 77 ! ! - n Photograph 5. Facing southeast along road near North Saskatchewan River on June 2,2017 m I l'-1 ,1. # Photograph 6. Facing north from T4 (53.360337", -713.706450') at North Saskatchewan River on June 2, 2017. EnviroMak lnc.#17-'18 78 *-J Iffi lDFr..l'" Photograph 7. Facing west along North Saskatchewan River looking at bank on June 2,2017. r "*t ..? ..: Photograph 8. Facing towards tree stand at T5 (53.359654", -113.706369") along North Saskatchewan River on June 2,2017 . EnviroMak lnc.#17-18 79 i "* i'" \\ { Photograph 9. Facing north at T6 (53.359251o, -l13.706298') across North Saskatchewan River on June 2,2017. E h ;v') { Photograph 10. Facing west at T7 (53.358704o, -1 13.706085') along North Saskatchewan River on June 2,2017. EnviroMak lnc.#17-18 80 =:* , 1--.:::* ,!ri i ? Photograph 11. Facing north at T7 across North Saskatchewan River on lune2,2077 Photograph 12. Looking down at cement blocks near T7 in the North Saskatchewan River on June 2, 2017 EnviroMak lnc.#17-18 81 NVIRO Environmental Efiects Assessment (E.A) for Proposed Bank Protection on the North Saskatchewan River AK Inc. Wthin Devon, Alberta at W35-50-26-W4i,l 15.2 Watershed Graphs EnviroMak lnc.#'17-18 82 NVIRO Environmental Effects Assessment (EA) for Proposed Bank Protection on the North Saskatchewan River l[Ire* Within Devon, Alberta at W35-50-26-W4M * mi4 0,,! u*rq MFlr - I E 6 E o! Iorih Figure 15.1. Monthly Discharge graph for North Saskatchewan River at Highway No. 759 (upstream of project area); statistics corresponding to 8 years ofdata recorded from 2007 to 2014(Government ofCanada Historical Hydrometric Data). t01a t *. .... 9uhun I*frsi - - t r. E s 5 I o Yolth Figure 15.2. Monthly Discharge graph for North Saskatchewan River at Edmonton (downstream of project area); statistics corresponding to 104 years of data recorded from l9l I to 2014 (Government of Canada Historical Hydrometric Data). EnviroMak lnc.#17-18 83 F nvrno Environmental Effects Assessment (EA) for Proposed Bank Protection on the North Saskatchewan River T{tr-ln,- Within Devon, Alberta at W35-50-26-W4M Xof$ Srtrtch.wn Rtv...t ltvy Itf latottl0l [y.. O-.'.A|r. rt. rtlr.No% 01, ta't? a Cs.ilY.r a rsnlFffi(Cu#r, bet5 T0rit 3rrlr " i,l4linr:r Lono[rb-!tia Tfitt Lilroa a6 s'tr?8 c.fie( 20t7-06-r? |j 13 It rrol T,-h,fr,1;rV O.{,r ! il,i*d l,t ir,lr,lrr Figure 15.3.2017 discharge data for the North Saskatchewan River at Highway No. 759 (upstream of project area) (AEP Alberta River Basins). llv.r O.t.' . Apr. 41. lO't, . NcY, ll, letT a Cur.d Y.r a WRrF (Ou*tr hslil, $odtl i ,r rr',. -11 , I 4rb r' . - I l ,, (t. L$gltJde r.t?22 L&r6e 33 ttt5? Cr€aad 2otr{6- l? l! t3 3t r,lol T, {'a 'r n} rr.,l I rl i i, " 1ir Figure 15.4.2017 discharge data for the North Saskatchewan River at Edmonton (downstream of project area (AEP Alberta River Basins). EnviroMak lnc.#17-18 84 Fnvrno Environmenlal Eflects Assessment (EA) for Proposed Bank Protection on the North Saskalchewan River Tvlrr-r*.- \r'vithin Devon. Alberta at W35-50-26-W4M 15.3 Engineering Design Plan and Report Enviroirak lnc.#17,'18 85 ---T -@_ RE T A'l lj NORIH SASKATCHEWAN RIWR + EXISTING CONCRETE RUBBLE PROTECTION STEEL SI-IEETPILE WALL 621 0 I r ll ROCK KEY ,o fi .:i at 0 a TOP OF BANK r EDGE OF ROAD BOREHOLE LOCATION BUITDING Easling: 319s03 --tl- BOREHOLE LOCATION il Nonhlngr 5915789 Easnng:319896 E = Nodhingr 5915890 I br .\". .. 1.t..-^,./f *I 1" /.i ;4:,.-. NOTES . .al_, ,n* I .,#d*q '1, -p,,?11 '' ru, 1. EXISTING SURFACE CONTOURS DERIVEO FROM SURVEY DATA CONDUCTED 8Y NHC, : l:. -' \\' 1 JUNE 2017. , ((:t \ 2. CONTOURINTERVALS.02.m. lh q). ( 3. BACKGROUNO IMAGE SOURCE: DRONE PHOTO, DATED , JUNE 2OI7: GOOGLE EARTH. DATEO S SEPTEMBER 2015. { :]!E ---l- DEVON LIONS CLUB 10 0 1O 20 30 40 50m E LION PARK. BANK PROTECTION _t_ SCALE 1:1m0 nhc PROPOSED BANK PROTECNON PLAN VIEW D$€.1002974-101 8 JUNE 2017 1 June 2017 EKY Figure No. Date Revision ENG, northwest hydraulic consultants ltd. 86 - EAST SECTION A A WEST 640 640 639 639 638 638 EXISTING TOP OF BANK .\ 637 636 636 ! r.-4.00---- I 635 635 ROCK KEY - €u* lSrACe r1 634 F WATER LEVEL \ EL. 629.835 *.8 632 I tft,q:g c (1 JUNE 2017) osz I DEADMAN fi osr & *,3 STEEL CABLE TIE.BACK 630 ^# 630 629 STEEL PLATE J STEEL SHEETPILE WALL 629 628 628 TO REFUSAL (BEDROCK SURFACE TO BE DETERMINEO 16 JUNE 2017) 627 627 T l I 626 I-' 626 - 625 625 .30 -20 .15 -10 -5 0 10 15 20 25 30 Offset (m) - EAST SECTION B B WEST 640 640 639 tl 639 63a EXISTING TOP OF BANK 638 tl -- 637 .16 -ROAD------t 636 -l 636 635 €u* - osa S E 633 WATER LEVEL oss EL. 629.766 E g 632 (1 JUNE 2017) osz 3 oar fi STEEL CABLE TIE-BACK oer ? 630 630 - | J-/ STEEL SHEETPILE WALL 629 srEEL PLATE 629 628 I 624 _ TO REFUSAL (BEOROCK SURFACE IO BE DETERMINED 16 JUNE 2017) 627 - 627 626 626 625 625 NOTES: -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Offset (m) I. EXISTING SURFACE SECTIONS BASED ON SURVEY DATA CONDUCTED BY NHC, ,1 JUNE 2017. 2. DISTANCE ANO ELEVATIONS ARE GIVEN IN METERS. 3. SECTION VIEWS ARE LOOKING DOWISTREAM. DEVON LIONS CLUB 2 2 4 6 10 m LION PARK. BANK PROTECTION SCIE 1:200 nhc PROPOSED BANK PROTECTION - STAGE I n0rthwesl SECNON VIEWS Dwg. 1002S74J01 8 JUNE 2017 0 8 June 2017 lssued for Review EKY hydraulic Figute 2 No. Oate Revision ENG. c0nsultants northwest hydraulic consultants ltd. 87 EAST SECTION C. C WEST MO 6,{0 639 638 EXISTING TOP OF BANK 638 l 637 \-- 637 636 I 636 ROCK KEY ls-7Tr7- 635 (srAGE 1) - 635 -\-Z ,#w I E 6s4 r,t (/ 634 P E 633 WATER LEVEL ,r' 633 E EL.629.741 6 632 ,e-.& (1 JUNE 2017) ---- 632 3 -e a2. T lt SIEEL CABLE TIE€AC 631 3 I 630 A5gY 630 *-*7- I steeL pLlte J 629 STEEL SHEETPILE WALL 629 I I 628 628 _ TO REFUSAL (EEDROCK SURFACE TO BE OETERMINED 16 JUNE 20,I7) 627 - 627 l I I 626 626 625 625 -30 -20 -15 -10 0 5 10 15 20 30 Offset (m) NOTES: 1. EXISTING SURFACE SECTIONS BASED ON SURVEY DATA CONOUCTED BY NHC. 1 JUNE 2017. 2. DISTANCE AND ELEVATIONS ARE GIVEN IN METERS. 3. SECTION VIEWS ARE LOOKING DOWISTREAM. DEVON LIONS CLUB 2 O 2 4 6 8 10m LION PARX. BANK PROTECTION SCALE 1 2OO nhc BANK PROTECTION . STAGE I northwest SECTION VIEW D$€.1002974-101 8 JUNE 2017 0 I Juno 2017 lssued for Roview EKY hydraulic Figure 3 No. Oate Revision ENG. consultants northwest hydraulic consultants ltd, 88 SECTION A EAST A. WEST 640 640 639 639 638 638 EXISTING TOP OF BANK -1 637 637 636 636 635 -r- 635 E 634 DEADi/AN - - 634 F WATER LEVEL - 633 f,... EL. 629.835 ROCK APRON E 6 632 (1 JUNE 2017) (STAGE 2) 632 I Y STEEL CABLE TIE-BACK #*, +4.5o____L( 631 3 I 630 ,/ rffaA,ffie STEEL SHEETPILE WALL 630 629 629 ': pnoJecteo rutune slr.rx 628 ----4'*--' 628 TO REFUSAL (BEDROCK SURFACE TO BE DETERMINEO 16 JUNE 2017) 627 627 626 626 625 625 -30 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 2A 30 Offset (m) SECTION B. B EAST WEST 640 640 639 li 639 638 lt NG TOP OF BANK 638 637 \- 637 \1 -ROAO------1 I 636 635 635 g 634 DEADMAN 634 E 5 633 WATER LEVEL 6$E EL. 629,766 ROCK APRON ri - i! 632 (1 - .-' 6s2 o JUNE 2017) lsrncezl \- , \ STEEL CABLE TIE.BACK I ^^, esr 3 \,r \- sreir sxeerpru weir -7'A -1.50---+/\ 630 629 t= t- {- pnolecteo putuRE BANK 629 628 628 TO REFUSAL (BEOROCK SURFACE TO BE DETERMINEO 1 6 JUNE 20 1 7) 627 626 - 626 625 - 525 -30 -25 .20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 't0 15 20 25 30 NOTES: Offset (m) 1. EXISTING SURFACE SECTIONS BASED ON SURVEY DATA CONDUCTED BY NHC, 1 JUNE 2017. 2. DISTANCE AND ELEVATIONS ARE GIVEN IN METERS. 3. SECTION VIEWS ARE LOOKING OOWISTREAM. DEVON LIONS CLUB 2 0 2 4 6 8 10m LION PARK. BANK PROTECTION SCALE 1:200 nhc PROPOSED BANK PROTECTION - STAGE 2 northwest SECNON VIEWS 0 8 June 2017 lssued for Review EKY hydraulic D$€.1002S7+101 8 JUNE 2017 Fiqure 4 No. Oate R6vision ENG. c0nsullants northwest hydraulic consultantB ltd. 89 - EAST sEcnoN c c WEST 640 640 639 I 639 EXISTING TOP OF BANK 638 638 I \- 637 637 636 #'r 636 635 635 , €u* DEADMAN ff4P 5 633 WATER LEVEL V I oo: EL.629.741 ROCK APRON E iE 632 I (1 (STAGE l'l osz 3 JUNE 20't7) 2) I ---\ STEEL CABLE TIE-8ACK ,9 osr oor ? I .dr-r.so- , STEEL SHEETPILE WALL 630 .....- 630 l 629 d /- r PROJECTEO FUTURE BANK 629 628 628 _ TO REFUSAL (BEDROCK SURFACE- TO 8E DETERMINED 16 JUNE 2017) 627 627 626 - I - 626 625 625 -30 -20 -15 -10 0 10 15 20 30 Ofiset (m) NOTES: I. EXISTING SURFACE SECTIONS BASED ON SURVEY DATA CONOUCTED 8Y NHC.1 JUNE 2017. 2. DISTANCE AND ELEVATIONS ARE GIVEN IN METERS. 3. SECTION VIEWS ARE LOOKING DOW\STREAI'. DEVON LIONS CLUB 2 O 2 1 6 6 10m LION PARX. BANK PROTECTION SCALE 1:200 nhc BANK PROTECNON - STAGE 2 northwest SECNON VIEW 0 8 June 20'17 lssued for Roview EKY hydraulic DuO.1002974-101 8 JUNE 2017 Figure 5 No. Date Revision ENG, consultants northwest hydraulic consultants ltd. 90 DESIGN NOTES: TaUe I Project objectives will be to construct a 97.5m long skaighl steel shoet pile wall oflset from an oroding right bank ofthe Nodh SaskatcheMn Riv6r adjacent Riv6r Lev6b and River Oischarge to the Devon Lion Club Camp Oround. The upshesm snd doMsheam ends of sheel pile Ell's geMoordinales are as Iollow: Return Period DischarOo River Level UFEream end: Eastno = 319898.019 m, Northing 5915888.597 m = (yea6) (0t'/s) (Elev. m.) DoMstoam end: Easting = 319903.091 m, Northing = 5915791.229 m 2 1270 631.67 2230 633.47 The project is designed for 2 staqes: 't0 2940 634.36 50 1570 635.82 Stage 2 - inslallalion ofrock dprap lo€ apron at a fufurs date when the eroding bank has begun to encroach onlo lhe File wll. 100 5270 636.26 Strgc I componcnb: Riv6r leveb represent avorago within 07.5 m long reach encompa$ing the . lnstallalion of stesl ptl6 mll. shoet pile wall. Drop along this length abod 0.07 m. . lnstallation of sto€l cablo ti6.backs. . lnstEllation ol upstream and doMskeam rock keys. Stage 2 componahts: . lhsbllalion of rock toe apron on end agrequired basis. Slag. I dGsign d.t ils: l, Thosteelril6mllwillbeconteredapproximatevl.16mfromthoedgeoftheexlEtingaccessro.d,Th6mllshallbe@nsrudedinastraiohilino, b€ginning at lhe above up6taeam coordinate lo its domstaeam end (see abovo cPS coordinat6). PortioN of ths rcad will be en@untered so any asphalt paving will hilo to be remvod prior to installation ofthe pile wall, 2. Ths kllshall b€ driven to a depth ot at least I m., orto refusal should a b€drock zon6 bo 6n@unt6red. 4. ThetopofthosheetpileMllwillbecutto6cmabovegroundlev6landasteelchannelshellb€lnstalledalongthetopofthefilemll. 5. Shoot file mterial will be supdied by the Conhaclor. Contractor stEcifod sheet seclion is p2G13. 8. A systom ofsteel cablo tiebacks will b€ installod at tho lo@tions and spacing established by the Conkaclor. Genoraly, 7. a tieback will b€ located 2 m. below etislihg ground surfa@. A st€61 plate will be weldod to steel File ai the Fil6 conneclion ahd e ste6l €ble will ortehd horizontally to a d€adman. 8. Rock koys shall be lnstalH al the upslr6am end downstream end oliho file mll. 9. A rock key shall consist ofClass ll rock (Dso = 500 mm). Rock shall be blocky end durable: free ofcracb snd spalls. 10. BoginninOalthedvsrmtarlevel,ailmwidox4mlongx3md66pkenchshallbeetceatodandfledwithrcck, Stage 2 design detrib: 1, Tho top of the right bank shall be annualty mnitored lor b6nk loss and shifiino. 2. At the appropriato lime and place along lhis Mll - i.e. oncroachment onto the Mll - a rock apron shall b€ installed to allevi6t6 the dsk oftoo scour. 3. The rock apron shall b€,{.5 m wide by 1.0 m thick and shall consist ofClass ll riprap rock. DEVON LIONS CLUB LION PARK - BANK PROTECTION nhc PROPOSED BANK PROTECTION northwest DESIGN NOTES hydraulic 1002974-101 8 JUNE 2017 6 No. Date Revision consultants northwest hydraulic consultants ltd. 91 z o 'oNaz E I b d ti'9 o@ lo oo .im= @v aQ qB6 az t,z.- c 7 m-lo ma { v d a <= ,> I q moo> >m ! a P ,fr 6a a € q8 L4 , g eg Nci n o fa B €= n 0 0 I 7 tr a zo @ m m t o I - a m i3 o p t e @ 6 : o I -o f m o m vC @ Im -r m Im c ! z ! m m € N 'o?:) T ,':t ztr o o, o CL o o o il ..+ m 3 .ia E n; @ I 1. 3B o O J J aq n I m a I I o -t ;a o fr I ao m o m mim z EB , o t + I T a 1 )i. (-, ::, ax =o )I @=f I trt:CD J i\ 92 sEcnoil A. A EAST BOREHOLE 1 640 839 838 F s0tL I EXISTING TOP OF BANK 637 s iE DESCRIPTION o &36 i, 635 ROCK KEY i)ti l)Pstr,L.da.k, qgEnc. tace roouets GROUNO ELryANON o (635.0 m) €u* (STAGE 1 ) t ss 1fj-SANO WATER LEVEL * 633 loe Eoy, trre orilsd f&o dgEncs ild r@i€b . .5 EL. 62S.835 o 632 (r JUNE 2017) DEADI,IAN u-9 ""'err STEEL CABLE TIE-BACK 6N STEEL SHEETPILE WALL 628 TO REFUSAL 627 SEE BOREHOLE AMLYSIS 626 sp 625 -30 -25 :20 -'t 0 -5 0 -gtrl 5 10 15 2C GT (( Offset (m) -gffilly -wry d6$ sm grryel I EAST SECNON B. B 640 su -dark grey 639 .t: 20m so cobbles 638 EXISTING TOP OF BANK GRAVEL 837 vfry den$, dak grey some ssnd [r€ o{d0s r::: 635 €u, -20m sizc cdbl6 633 WATER LEVEL t EL. 629.766 532 6 (1 JUNE 2017) DEADMAN esr 'mp*l fi STEEL CABLE NE-BACK SM 630 STEEL SHEETPILE WALL 625 STEEL PLATE GU 828 TO REFUSAL 627 SEE BOREHOLE ANALYSIS 426 625 GM ::il NOTES: 0 '10 't5 2( (m) CLAY, grey. silty, kace coal and srll pocket5 1. EXISTING SURFACE SECTIONS BASED ON SURVEY DATA CONDUCTED BY NHC, I JUNE 2017 Offset cfi 2. DISTANCE AND ELEVATIONS ARE GMEN IN METERS. 3. SECTION VIEWS ARE LOOKING DOWNSTREAM. 4. SOIUGROUND ANALYSIS BY THURSER ENGINEERING (15 JUNE 20i7) DEVON LIONS CLUB 2 O 2 4 6 I 10m LION PARK - BANK PROTECTION scALE l:m nhc PROPOSEO BANK PROTECTION . STAGE 1 n0finwest SECTION VIEWS 20 Juno 2017 Soil Amlysis included tor Borohol€s 1 I 2 EKY D*g. too297+1ol 20 JUNE 2017 Flgure 2 0 8 Jure m17 lsGuod for R6vbw Efi hydraulic R1l No. Dale Revision ENG, consultants northw€st hydraulic con3ultanb ltd' 93 BOREHOLE 2 -I- E E SOIL I f, DESCRIPTION 6 CROUNDELryATEN l6ls.6 n) loe, gFy, frE grin€d. b&e grydar$ rcoleb -da* gey EAST sEclloN c. c 640 WSM -g.ey, b&o oxides 839 638 637 P 636 635 eu* su "mo grilol .E 633 6 632 -cmpal fi ssr SP a 630 629 sc -da* grry, gm[y, kae rlty d.y 428 427 6m dm$, da* eror, se sad, haco oxid6 GL 625 -30 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 10 Offset (m) GY -cmp&l GU Glt NOTES: 1. EXISTING SURFACE SECTIONS BASED ON SURVEY DATA CONDUCTED BY cmpacl, grey NHC. 1 JUNE 2017. s 2. DISTANCE AND ELEVATIONE ARE GIVEN IN METERS. 3. SECTION VIEWS ARE LOOKING DOWNSTREAM. 4. SOIUGROUND ANALYSIS BY THURBER ENGINEERING (15 JUNE 20,I7) DEVON LIONS CLUB 2 O 2 4 6 I tom LION PARK - BANK PROTECTION SCALE 1:200 nhc BANK PROTECTION . STAGE 1 northwest SECTION VIEW 1 20 June 2017 SoilAEtysis includsd for Borehobs I & 2 Efi owg. 100297+1Ol 20 JUNE 2017 0 8 June 2017 lssued for Review EK/ hydraulic Rll Flgure 3 No. Dalo Revision ENG. consultants northwe8t hydraulic consultants ltd. I. 94 - EASI SECTION A A WESI 640 640 639 639 638 638 EXISTING TOP OF BANK 037 637 636 ,.*-] 636 635 635 Eu* DEADMAN ,*F 5 633 WATER LEVEL uoE EL. 629.835 ROCK APRON b 632 (1 JUNE ml7) (STAGE 2) osz 9 8*, STEEL CABLE TIE-BACK osr ? 630 STEEL SHEETPILE WALL 630 829 429 PROJECTED FUTURE BANK 628 628 TO REFUSAL 6n 627 626 626 625 625 -30 -m -15 -10 0 5 10 20 30 Otrset (m) EAST SECNON B. B WEST 640 640 639 839 638 EXISTING TOP OF BANK 638 637 637 1.16*] 636 636 635 635 €u, OEADMAN ar+ $ 633 WATER LEVEL 641 0 5 EL. 629.766 iD 632 ROCK APRON (1 JUNE 20r7) (srAGE 2) STEEL CABLE TIE.BACK osz 9 fi osr 83'3 STEEL SHEETPILE WALL 630 6:t0 6n PROJECTED FUTURE BANK 6n 528 628 TO REFUSAL 627 6n 626 626 625 625 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 i.loTEs: Offset (m) ,I. EXISTING SURFACE SECTIONS BASED ON SURVEY DATA CONOUCTEO BY ,I NHC. JUNE M17. 2. OISTANCE AND ETEVATIONS ARE GMEN IN MEIERS. 3. SECTION VIEWS ARE LOOKING OOWNSTREAM. DEVON LIONS CLUB 2 O 2 4 6 6 tom LION PARK . BANK PROTECTION SilE 1:200 nhc PROPOSED BANK PROTECTION . STAGE 2 n0rthwest sEcTloN vlEws 1 20 Juno 2017 1 &2 EKY 0 8 Jun6 2017 l66u6d for R6vi6w EKY hydraulic Dws. loo297+lo1 Rrl 20 JUNE 2017 Flqure 4 No. Dais Revision ENG. consultants northwesl hydraulic consultants ltd. 95 - EAST sEcnoil c c WEST 040 640 639 639 638 EXISTING TOP OF BANK 638 637 637 636 636 635 635 Eu* DEADMAN osr $ E 6s3 WATER LEVEL 633 g EL.623.741 ROCK APRON g 632 esz 3 (1 JUNE 2017) (STAGE 2) STEEL CABLE TIE-AACK #*, osr ? 630 STEEL SHEETPILE WALL 630 629 PROJECTED FUTURE BANK a2g 628 628 TO REFUSAL 427 427 626 626 025 625 -30 -20 -15 -10 0 '10 15 20 30 Offset (m) NOTES: 1. EXISTING SURFACE SECTIONS BASED ON SURVEY OATA CONDUCTED BY NHC. 1 JUNE 20,I7. 2. DIETANCE ANO ELEVATIONS ARE GIVEN IN METERS. 3. SECTION VIEWS ARE LOOKING DOWNSIRFAM. DEVON LIONS CLUB 2 O 2 4 6 0 toh LION PARK. BANK PROTECTION SCALE 1:200 nhc BANK PROTECTION . STAGE 2 northwest sEcTtoN vlEw 1 20 June 2017 EKY 100297+101 2017 0 8 June 2017 ls6ued for Review EKY hvdraulic D*g. R1l 20 JUNE Flqurc 5 No. Date R6vision ENG. consultants northwest hydraulic consultants ltd. 96 DESIGN NOTES: Tabh I Rlver Lewls end Rlvor Dlscharpo Proioct objodtu68 will b6 to @nstruct a 97,5m long stralght 8le6l shel pil6 mll offtol lroh an 6roding righl bank of ltE North Saskalchw.n Rlvd .djent io ths Dwon Llon Club C.mp grcund. The upsuoam and downstEam ends otsh6t pils wall's ge{@rdinet6s arB as bllN: Rehlm Period Dlrchalgs Rlver Lsvel Upstream eM: Easling = 319898.019 m, Nonhlng = 5915888.597 m (ysa6) (m%) (Elov. m.) Oownstraam ond: Easling = 319903.09, m, NodhlrE = 591579,.229 m 2 1270 631.67 5 2230 633.47 Th6 pojst is d68lgmd for 2 6tag6s: 10 2940 634.36 StagB I - iEtalladon of sb6l sh6€t 9[9 rall. 50 4570 635.82 Stag€ 2 - iEtail.tbn ol M* ripEp toe apDn 6l . tutro d6te wlr€n tho oroding benk h€8 b6gun to olrc|@h onto th6 pil6 wall. 100 5270 636.26 St gD I compomrL: River lovels ropB$nt avoEg6 within 97.5 m ldg Ech e@mpssing ths 6het pi,p wall. Omp along lhi6 length abod 0.07 m. lnstallatbn of sEl@ble tie-backs. lnstallation of upsbeam and downsbeam rcck key8, Elaga 2 mporentai . lnsbllatlcn of r@k b apron on snd e6+quhod bsis. 8Lr. 1 d..lgn d.Ellr: 1. Tho stoel pil6 wafi wig be mteGd app@ximtdy l.l6 m trom h6 edg6 of ttE exisilng ffis @d. The wall 6hall be @n8t wt6d ln a shrlght lino, beginning at the 6bove upstream @dimto b lti dqmEbdm ond (so abovo GPS @rdlnEies). Porliom of tho ro6d will b6 o@unter€d & any a8phalt p8ving will have io b6 6l@6d prlor to lnlbllation of the pile wall. 2. Tho wall 6hall b€ drlvon to a d6pth of at bast I m,, or io r6fusal should a bod@k rcne b6 en@unt6Ed. 4. Tho top of the shcel pib E[ will be on to 6 cm abovc g@urd hvel snd a stoel channol 3h6ll bc lnlt lled alo.lg lh6 top of tE pllo Ell. 5. Sh6sl pikr mtorialwill be suppli€d by the ConbEclor. ContEctor 6pocifi6d she6t sli6 is p2c-13. 6. A syslem of 8tcel @ble tifbrcks will b6 instsllod et lhe lo@tloN end Epaclng establi8hcd by thc Contraclor. 7. C€nelly, a tl6+ek will b6 locabd 2 m. b€h[t dl8tlng gDUM surfe. A 6t6el plate wi,l bo w.ldrd to 6t6el pll6 et the pib @nmction and a !to6l 6blo wlll axbrd horiantauy Io . deadmn. 8. Rock koys shafi b6 lmtEIDd at th6 up6t€am and dwnstrem ond of ths pil€ wall. L A @k key shall @n8l6t ot Ch$ ll rcck (D$ = 600 mm), Rock Ghsll bo blocky add durablo; fi@ ol cEcks and 6pollE. '10. B€ginnlngatlhedvorwatarl6v6l,a4mwilox4mlomx3md6ptEnch6hallb€oxdatad!MfllLdwlth@k. stlo 2de.lgnd.bnr: 1. Ths top of ft6 rlghl bankEha[ b6 ann@lly monltor€d lbr bank hss ahd shiftihg. 2. Al tho apprcpdat tim and pl.@ olong thls wEll- 1... r@Echrent onio th6 wall - a @k aprcn !h6ll be inst lhd to alhviata thg rlsk ol bc i@ur, ,l.0 3. The @k apon sh6lt b€ 4.5 m wH6 by m thlcft rrd shall @n8bl of Ch$ ll dpcp @k. I DEVON LIONS CLUB I I LION PARK . BANK PROTECTION I PROPOSED PROTECTION I nhc BANK DESIGN NOTES I northwest 1 &2 EKY 1@297+101 20 JUNE M17 Flgurc 6 0 i8JuBmlT EKY hydraulic No. Dot6 Revision ENG. consultants northwest hydraulic consultants ltd. 97 Request for Decison Date June 20 2017 RFD Prepared Month Day Year Asset Management Policy 5306 Recommended Action That Council approve the Asset Management Policy 5306 as recommened. That Council directs Administration to apply for funding under the Green Fund from the Federation of Canadian Municipalities’ Municipal Asset Management Program for the Asset Management Plan as follows: Be it therefore resolved that the Town of Devon commits to conducting the following activities in its proposed project submitted to the Federation of Canadian Municipalities’ Municipal Asset Management Program to advance our asset management program: • Asset Management Plan • Asset Management Assessments • Data Collection and Reporting Be it further resolved that the Town of Devon commits $47,500 from its budget toward the costs of this initiative. Proposal and Background The Province of Alberta has been undertaking an extensive review of the Municpal Government Act over the past several years. One of the proposed changes is with respect to Corporate Planning. Currently Municipalities are required to adopt annual operating and capital budgets but all other long-term planning is voluntary. Upon development of the related regulation by the fall of 2017, Municipalities will be required to adopt at minimum, three-year operating plans and five-year capital plans so that Albertans have greater access to information about municipal financial decisions. The adoption of an Asset Management (AM) Policy is the first step toward enhanced asset management within the municipality. As outlined in the policy the purpose of an asset management policy is: “To provide program principles and a framework for asset management practices that enables a coordinated, cost effective and organizationally sustainable approach across all departments in order to: • Optimize the life cycle costs while maintaining acceptable levels of service; • Link infrastructure investment decisions to service outcomes; • Improve decision-making accountability and transparency; • Demonstrate the long term consideration of decisions; and • Improve customer service.” Asset Management Policy 5306 Agenda Item 8.1 Page 1 of 3 98 Currently the Town prepares and presents a Long Term Capital Plan for Council review and approval in principle. The Long term Capital Plan provides a forecast of capital expenditures for repairs, replacement and maintenance of capital assets as well as projected New Infrastructure capital acquisitions for a ten year period. Over the course of the past several years, Council has repeatedly requested additional information regarding the condition of the assets identified in the Long term Capital Plan and in the Annual Capital Budgets. One of the key outcomes of the Assest Management Policy is the development of an Asset Management Plan (AMP) which is a strategic plan for managing the Town’s infrastructure and other assets to deliver an agreed level of service. To be an effective decision-making tool the AMP will need to include condition assessments of all the Town’s assets. It is anticipated that these condition assessments will be completed over the next two years. Discussion on Benefits, Disadvantages and Options The Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) acknowledges that municipalities must manage publicly owned assets as part of their mandate to provide services to communities. …..Assessing the health of municipal infrastructure is necessary if Canada is to ensure that the services, quality of life and economic growth provided by this infrastructure can be sustained over the long term. - Canadian Infrastructure Report Card, 2016 In support of this major undertaking, FCM has allocated funds under the Green Fund for municipalites to make application to conduct Asset Management Plan which the Town intends to do. Following are the Key Roles for Managing an Asset Management Policy: Town policies are approved by Council. While staff, the public and other agencies may provide input on the nature and text of the policy, Council retains the authority to approve, update, amend or rescind policies. Role Responsibility Identification of issues, and development of policy updates Council and staff Establish levels of service Council, staff & public Exercise stewardship of assets, adopt policy and budgets Council Implementation of policy CAO and staff Development of guidelines and practices CAO and staff On-going review of policies Council and staff Implementation, review and reporting of asset management work The implementation, review and reporting back regarding this policy shall be integrated within the organization. The Town’s asset management program shall be reported annually through the presentation of the Long term Capital Plan and the approval of the annual Captial Budgets by Council. Actions Responsibilities Adopt Asset Management Policy Council and CAO Monitor and review infrastructure standards and levels of service Council and CAO Asset Management Policy 5306 Agenda Item 8.1 Page 2 of 3 99 policies at established intervals Develop and maintain infrastructure strategies including Planning & Infrastructure, development and service plans Finance Develop and maintain asset inventories Planning & Infrastructure, Parks, Finance Assess infrastructure condition and service levels Planning & Infrastructure Establish and monitor infrastructure replacement levels through Planning & Infrastructure, the use of full life cycle costing principles Finance Report to citizens on the status of the community’s infrastructure Council and CAO assets and asset management program. The channels may include citizen reports, business plans, long term capital plans, etc. Financial / Policy Considerations The overall cost of this project is estimated at $150,000. Council has approved $25,000 of funding within the 2017 utility budgets to assist with the utility infrastructure component of this project as well as $22,500 from the 2016 year end surplus for professional services for the development of an Asset Management Plan and Critical Activities Path. Administration will also be applying for funding under the FCM Municipal Asset Management Grant Program for the maximum funding available - $50,000 under this program. These initial funds of $97,500 will assist with collecting the information for all categories of the Asset Management Plan , a maturity assessment report and commencing the Critical Activities Path (CAP) during 2017 with the expectation that the CAP will be completed during 2018. Administration will be allocating additional funds for this project in the 2018 operating budget as well as considering a further transfer from the 2017 year end surplus. Implementation/Communications The Town will submit the grant application to FCM by June 30, 2017 for funding under the Municipal Asset Management Program along with a copy of the Council Resolution above. The Town will commence work with our software provider or subject matter experts to address the gaps currently identified in our asset inventories Target Decision Date June 26 2017 Council Meeting Date Month Day Year Submitted By Dianna Doyle, Director of Finance & SS Paresh Dhariya, Director of Planning & Infrastructure with input from Al Allim, Manager of Accounting Name / Title Reviewed By Tony Kulbisky, CLGM - Chief Administrative Officer Name / Title CAO Comments Support recommended action. Attachments 1. Draft Asset Management Policy 5306 Asset Management Policy 5306 Agenda Item 8.1 Page 3 of 3 100 Policy 5306 Asset Management Plan Year/Month/Day Resolutions xxx/2017 Effective Date 2017-05-26 Reference Policy 4202 Equipment Replacement Next Review Date 2020 Lead Role Finance and Support Services Notes Asset Management Plan Approval(s) Tony Kulbisky, CAO Policy Statement The Town of Devon shall adopt and apply recognized asset management (AM) practices in support of a consistent and coordinated approach to the management of Town assets to ensure long-term sustainability and to demonstrate fiscal stewardship in delivering services to its customers. Purpose To provide program principles and a framework for asset management practices that enables a coordinated, cost effective and organizationally sustainable approach across all departments in order to: • Optimize the life cycle costs while maintaining acceptable levels of service; • Link infrastructure investment decisions to service outcomes; • Improve decision-making accountability and transparency; • Demonstrate the long term consideration of decisions; and • Improve customer service. Definitions Asset: has a physical nature, is a significant economic resource and supports the delivery of programs and/or services. Asset Management: is a systematic process to guide the planning, acquisition, operation and maintenance, rehabilitation and disposal of assets. Its objective is to maximize asset service delivery potential, manage related risks and minimize costs of ownership while delivering acceptable levels of service to the public in a sustainable manner. Asset Management Plan (AMP): is a strategic plan for managing the Town’s infrastructure and other assets to deliver an agreed level of service. Life-cycle: the time interval that commences with the identification of the need for an asset and terminates with the disposal of the asset. Asset Management Policy Policy 5306 Page 1 of 2 101 Tangible Capital Asset: as per the Town’s Tangible Capital Asset (TCA) Policy 5305, TCA are non- financial assets having physical substance that: a. are held for use in the production or supply of goods and services, for rental to others, for administrative purposes or for the development, construction, maintenance or repair of other tangible capital assets; b. have useful economic lives extending beyond an accounting period; c. are to be used on a continuing basis; and d. are not for sale in the ordinary course of operations. Guidelines 1. This policy applies to the lifecycle management activities of physical assets that are owned or operated by the Town, which have a material impact on the Town’s capital and/or operating budget. 2. The Town’s asset management goal will be accomplished through asset inventories, condition assessments and life-cycle costing. 3. The Town will maintain and manage infrastructure assets at defined levels to support public safety, community well-being and community goals. 4. The Town will monitor standards and service levels to ensure that they meet/support community and Council goals and objectives. 5. The Town will establish infrastructure replacement strategies through the use of life cycle costing principles. 6. The Town will plan financially for the appropriate level of maintenance of assets to deliver service levels and extend useful life of assets. 7. The Town will plan for and provide stable long term funding to replace and/or renew and/or decommission infrastructure assets. 8. The Town will seek funding and service delivery opportunities to address infrastructure investment pressures. 9. Provide regular updates to Council on the state of the Town’s assets, forecasted trends and costs (typically aligned with presenting the Long Term Capital Plan for approval). Procedure 1. The Town will develop and maintain asset inventories of its entire infrastructure. 2. The Town will complete condition assessments on its entire asset inventories. 3. The Town will develop an Asset Management Plan that through the application of sound asset management guidelines and practices, will aim for assets to meet performance levels, be used to deliver the desired service in the long term and be managed for present and future users. Asset Management Policy Policy No. 5306 Page 2 of 2 102 Request for Decision Date June 21st 2017 RFD Prepared Month Day Year Recommended Action 1. That Council gives first reading to the Parks, Recreation and Culture Board Bylaw 893/2017 as recommended. 2. That Council gives second reading to the Parks, Recreation and Culture Board Bylaw 893/2017 as recommended. 3. That Council proceeds to third reading of the Parks, Recreation and Culture Board Bylaw 893/2017 as recommended. 4. That Council gives third reading to the Parks, Recreation and Culture Board Bylaw 893/2017 as recommended. Proposal and Background Both Council and Board members have provided feedback in support of defining board responsibilities, more communication and stronger alignment between Council and the Board. In January 2017, members of Council, the Parks, Recreation and Culture Board (PRCB), and Administration met for a World Café style conversation about the PRCB’s roles and responsibilities of the Board and its members. This activity provided clarity to the PRCB who then used the results of the world café discussions to recommend long overdue updates to Bylaw 664/99. Attached is the proposed new bylaw that incorporates all those recommended changes and with its approval will rescind Bylaw 664/99. Discussion on Benefits, Disadvantages and Options With Council’s adoption of the Parks, Recreation and Culture Master Plan and the Community Engagement Framework, there is a clear shift in the Town’s approach to community engagement, project management, and user group relations. While the benefits of this community development approach are many, it has also created some confusion about the purpose of Council-appointed governance boards, as well as the roles and responsibilities of the members appointed to those boards. The PRCB has recommended changes to the appointment and term of board members, the responsibility of the Member of Council appointed to the Board, the proceedings and particularly to the powers and duties of the board. Financial / Policy Considerations The proposed bylaw is aligned with the Devon Parks, Recreation and Culture Master Plan. Parks, Recreation and Culture Board 893/2017 Bylaw Agenda Item 8.2 Page 1 of 2 103 Implementation/Communications Upon Council’s adoption of Bylaw 893/2017, Administration will advertise to the committee regarding a position opening on the PRCB. Going forward, members of the PRCB will be responsible to adhere to the rules and regulations set out in Bylaw 893/2017. Target Decision Date June 26 2017 Council Meeting Date Month Day Year Submitted By Kristin Walsh, Manager of Parks, Recreation & Culture Name / Title Reviewed By Tony Kulbisky, CLGM – Chief Administrative Officer Name / Title CAO Comments Support recommended action and that Council consider making all three readings to enact the new bylaw. Attachments 1. PRCB Old Bylaw - showing recommended edits 2. PRCB Draft New Bylaw - clean copy Parks, Recreation and Culture Board 893/2017 Bylaw Agenda Item 8.2 Page 2 of 2 104 Bylaw 664/99 BEING a Bylaw of the Town of Devon in the Province of Alberta to establish and define a Parks, Recreation and Culture Board. WHEREAS the “Municipal Government Act”, Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 and amendments, provides Council the authority to establish Council Committees and other bodies. NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF DEVON, DULY ASSEMBLED, HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. Definitions In this bylaw: a) “Board” shall mean and include the Devon Parks, Recreation and Culture Board; b) “Council” shall mean the Council of the Town of Devon in the Province of Alberta; c) “Devon Recreation Area” shall mean the area outlined on the maps in schedules ‘A’, ‘B’ and ‘C’ attached to this Bylaw; d)c) “Resident” shall mean a person whose principal residence is within the corporate limits of the Town of Devon; d) “Town” shall mean the Town of Devon in the Province of Alberta; e) “Properly Constituted Meetings” shall mean regularly scheduled meetings or those identified by Board resolution with quorum. 2. Appointment and Term i. The Devon Parks, Recreation and Culture Board shall consist of eight (8) members. The membership shall consist of: (a) One (1) member of the municipal Council of the Town appointed by resolution of Council (b) Seven (7) members of the public at large appointed by resolution of Council, four (4) of whom shall be residents of the Town of Devon and two (2) of whom shall be residents of the designated “Devon recreation area” of Parkland County and one (1) of whom shall be a resident of the designated “Devon recreation area” of the County of Leduc. A. The Board composition shall be Eight (8) members as follows: i. Four (4) members of the public at- large who reside within the Town ii. Two (2) members at-large who reside within the Devon Recreation Area of the County of Parkland; iii. One (1) member at-large who resides within the Devon Recreation Area of the County of Leduc; and ii.iv. One(1) of the above seven (7) positions shall be occupied by a person between the ages of 14 and 20 who resides within either Parks, Recreation, Culture Bylaw Bylaw 664/99 Page 1 of 6 105 the Town, or the Counties of Parkland or Leduc; iii.v. One (1) Town Councillor. B. Appointment of members shall be made at the organizational meeting of Council held in October of each year or at such other time as may be required or as Council may decide B.C. Members of the public at large shall be appointed for a two (2) year term. Nothing shall preclude Council from appointing members for one additional two (2) year term. C.D. An applicant who has served two consecutive two (2) year terms may be appointed to the Board by Council, i. if two (2) years have passed since the end of the two consecutive two (2) years terms served; or ii. if no other applications have been received; or ii.iii. at the discretion of Council. D.E. A member of the Board may resign at any time by giving written notice to the Chief Administrative Officer of the Town. Such resignation shall be effective at the date and time it is received by the Chief Administrative Officer. E.F. A member appointed to fill a vacancy, however created, shall be appointed by resolution of Council for a term equal to the remainder of the term that would have been served by the vacated member. F.G. A member of the Board who is appointed as a resident and ceases to be a resident shall be ineligible to remain a member of the Board. G.H. A member of the board who is appointed as a representative from the designated Recreation Area of either Parkland County or Leduc County and who ceases to be resident of their respective area shall be ineligible to remain a member of the Board. H.I. All members of the Board shall serve at the pleasure direction of Council and may be removed from the Board by resolution of Council. 3. Responsibility of Member Appointed from Council A. The member of the Board appointed from Council shall provide shall provide effective and efficient communications between the Board and Council. the Board Parks, Recreation, Culture Bylaw Bylaw 664/99 Page 2 of 6 106 with information regarding activities as a standing item at each regular meeting. The Council member shall update Council regarding Board activities and issues, as well as work with Council to include the Board in decision-making processes pertaining to parks, recreation or culture within the Town. 4. Board Member Disqualification A. A member who is absent from three (3) consecutive regular meetings shall be disqualified from remaining as a member of the Board. B. A member is not disqualified under Subsection 4 (A.) if the absence is authorized by resolution of the Board passed prior to the end of the third meeting for which that member has been absent. 5. Proceedings A. Time and place of meetings in consultation with the staff liaison to be determined by resolution of the Board. Meetings will only be called when necessary. B. Special meetings may be called by the chair, or majority of the Board’s members. Notice of special meetings shall be given in writing, 24 hours prior to the holding of the meeting. Any waiver of notice shall become part of the minutes of that meeting. C. All meetings of the Board shall be open to the general public. Board agendas will be advertised prior to meetings and minutes will be posted on the Town website. D. The Board shall elect a chair and a vice-chair at the first meeting following when Council makes their annual appointments to the Board. The member appointed from Council shall not be elected as chair or vice-chair. E. A quorum of the Board shall be a majority of the committee members appointed at the time of the meeting. A quorum shall be no less than four (4) members. F. Any decision of the Board reached by a majority of its members present at a properly constituted meeting shall be deemed to be the decision of the Board. G. The Board, should it deem advisable, may request the attendance at its meetings of any person, or persons, in an advisory capacity. H. Remuneration of the members of the Board and the secretary shall be established by Board & Committee Remuneration Policy established by Council. Parks, Recreation, Culture Bylaw Bylaw 664/99 Page 3 of 6 107 I. The board shall file a copy of the minutes of every Board meeting with the Town to be kept on file, with copies being distributed to Council. 6. Board Members A. Each Board member will have one vote. All members, including the chair, shall vote on all questions and in the event of a tie, the resolution is lost. B. Members shall abstain from voting when there is an apparent conflict of interest. Members in conflict shall leave the room during the actual vote and discussion. C. Neither the Board, nor any member thereof, shall have the power to pledge the credit of the Town in connection with any matters whatsoever, nor shall neither the said Board, nor any member thereof, have any power to authorize any expenditure to be charged against the Town. 7. Powers and Duties of the Board A. The mandate of the Board is to act as stewards of the Parks, Recreation and Culture Master Plan. A.B. The Board shall operate under the terms of reference attached as “Schedule B” which are approved and/or amended by resolution of Council. B.C. The Board shall act in an advisory capacity to Council in relation to matters regarding parks, recreation, cultural and infrastructure programs and services provided or to be provided inby the Town. C.D. The Board may be consulted by Council on matters regarding parks, recreation, cultural and infrastructure programs and services provided or to be provided in the Town. D.E. The Board shall co-operate engage with and encourage all organizations within the Town the community to support and promote a broad range of recreation and cultural programs, parks and services that will provide the opportunity for all citizens of all ages to make use of their leisure time in a wholesome holistic, inclusive and rewarding and satisfactory manner. E.F. The Board shall carry out a bi-annual review and recommend to Council any necessary revisions to the Parks, Recreation and Culture Master Plan. Parks, Recreation, Culture Bylaw Bylaw 664/99 Page 4 of 6 108 F.G. The Board shall hear and consider representatives from any individual, organization or delegation of citizens on any matter concerning parks, recreation, cultural and infrastructure programs and services and make such recommendations to Council as the Board feels to be in the best interest of our community. G.H. The Board shall review Bylaw No. 893/2017 biennially (every two years). Recommendations for changes shall be submitted to Council for consideration as needed. H.I. The Board shall meet annually with Council. This Bylaw shall come into force and effect upon third reading by Council and Bylaw 664/99 is hereby rescinded upon this bylaw coming into effect. Parks, Recreation, Culture Bylaw Bylaw 664/99 Page 5 of 6 109 SCHEDULE AB TERMS OF REFERENCE PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURE BOARD Reports to: Mayor and Council The Board: Created by Bylaw of Council; Appointments made by Council Purpose: The Parks, Recreation and Culture Board was established by Council to advise Council on matters regarding parks, recreation and culture programs, services, and infrastructure in the Town as well as to act as stewards of the Parks, Recreation and Culture Master Plan. Responsibilities: 1. To cooperate with and encourage all community recreation and cultural individuals, organizations or delegations of citizens.. 2. The Board Chair, Board Council representative and Town representative shall prepare for Council, an annual written report by the end of September outlining the activities of the Parks, Recreation and Culture Board for the preceding 12 months. 3. To receive as information, review, consider, or act, on all matters placed before it by the Director of Community & Protective Services Council or designate. 4. To review, consider or act, if required, on all matters referred to the Board by Council. 5. The Board’s authority does not extend to personnel matters or day to day operational matters. 6. The Board may submit written suggestions to Council at any time regarding: a) any item that is not covered in a plan already adopted by Council; b) changes to service levels; or c) changes to future projects or development priorities as stated in any adopted plan of Council. Parks, Recreation, Culture Bylaw Bylaw 664/99 Page 6 of 6 110 Bylaw 893/2017 Parks, Recreation & Culture Board Year/Month/Day Resolutions xxx/2017 Effective Date 2017/xx/xx Related Bylaws Lead Role Community & Economic Development BEING a Bylaw of the Town of Devon in the Province of Alberta to establish and define a Parks, Recreation and Culture Board. WHEREAS the “Municipal Government Act”, Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 and amendments, provides Council the authority to establish Council Committees and other bodies. NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF DEVON, DULY ASSEMBLED, HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. Definitions In this bylaw: a) “Board” shall mean and include the Devon Parks, Recreation and Culture Board; b) “Council” shall mean the Council of the Town of Devon in the Province of Alberta; c) “Resident” shall mean a person whose principal residence is within the corporate limits of the Town of Devon; d) “Town” shall mean the Town of Devon in the Province of Alberta; e) “Properly Constituted Meetings” shall mean regularly scheduled meetings or those identified by Board resolution with quorum. 2. Appointment and Term A. The Board composition shall be Eight (8) members as follows: i. Four (4) members of the public at-large who reside within the Town ii. Two (2) members at-large who reside within the Devon Recreation Area of the County of Parkland; iii. One (1) member at-large who resides within the County of Leduc; and iv. One(1) of the above seven (7) positions shall be occupied by a person between the ages of 14 and 20 who resides within either the Town, or the Counties of Parkland or Leduc; v. One (1) Town Councillor. Name of Bylaw Bylaw 893/2017 Page 1 of 6 111 B. Appointment of members shall be made at the organizational meeting of Council held in October of each year or at such other time as may be required or as Council may decide C. Members of the public at large shall be appointed for a two (2) year term. Nothing shall preclude Council from appointing members for one additional two (2) year term. D. An applicant who has served two consecutive two (2) year terms may be appointed to the Board by Council, i. if two (2) years have passed since the end of the two consecutive two (2) years terms served; or ii. if no other applications have been received; or iii. at the discretion of Council. E. A member of the Board may resign at any time by giving written notice to the Chief Administrative Officer of the Town. Such resignation shall be effective at the date and time it is received by the Chief Administrative Officer. F. A member appointed to fill a vacancy, however created, shall be appointed by resolution of Council for a term equal to the remainder of the term that would have been served by the vacated member. G. A member of the Board who is appointed as a resident and ceases to be a resident shall be ineligible to remain a member of the Board. H. A member of the board who is appointed as a representative from the designated Recreation Area of either Parkland County or Leduc County and who ceases to be resident of their respective area shall be ineligible to remain a member of the Board. I. All members of the Board shall serve at the direction of Council and may be removed from the Board by resolution of Council. 3. Responsibility of Member Appointed from Council A. The member of the Board appointed from Council shall provide the Board with information regarding activities as a standing item at each regular meeting. The Council member shall update Council regarding Board activities and issues, as well as work with Council to include the Board in decision-making processes pertaining to parks, recreation or culture within the Town. Name of Bylaw Bylaw 893/2017 Page 2 of 6 112 4. Board Member Disqualification A. A member who is absent from three (3) consecutive regular meetings shall be disqualified from remaining as a member of the Board. B. A member is not disqualified under Subsection 4 (A.) if the absence is authorized by resolution of the Board passed prior to the end of the third meeting for which that member has been absent. 5. Proceedings A. Time and place of meetings in consultation with the staff liaison to be determined by resolution of the Board. Meetings will only be called when necessary. B. Special meetings may be called by the chair, or majority of the Board’s members. Notice of special meetings shall be given in writing, 24 hours prior to the holding of the meeting. Any waiver of notice shall become part of the minutes of that meeting. C. All meetings of the Board shall be open to the general public. Board agendas will be advertised prior to meetings and minutes will be posted on the Town website. D. The Board shall elect a chair and a vice-chair at the first meeting following when Council makes their annual appointments to the Board. The member appointed from Council shall not be elected as chair or vice-chair. E. A quorum of the Board shall be a majority of the members appointed at the time of the meeting. A quorum shall be no less than four (4) members. F. Any decision of the Board reached by a majority of its members present at a properly constituted meeting shall be deemed to be the decision of the Board. G. The Board, should it deem advisable, may request the attendance at its meetings of any person, or persons, in an advisory capacity. H. Remuneration of the members of the Board and the secretary shall be established by Board & Committee Remuneration Policy established by Council. I. The board shall file a copy of the minutes of every Board meeting with the Town to be kept on file, with copies being distributed to Council. Name of Bylaw Bylaw 893/2017 Page 3 of 6 113 6. Board Members A. Each Board member will have one vote. All members, including the chair, shall vote on all questions and in the event of a tie, the resolution is lost. B. Members shall abstain from voting when there is an apparent conflict of interest. Members in conflict shall leave the room during the actual vote and discussion. C. Neither the Board, nor any member thereof, shall have the power to pledge the credit of the Town in connection with any matters whatsoever, nor shall neither the said Board, nor any member thereof, have any power to authorize any expenditure to be charged against the Town. 7. Powers and Duties of the Board A. The mandate of the Board is to act as stewards of the Parks, Recreation and Culture Master Plan. B. The Board shall operate under the terms of reference attached as “Schedule B” which are approved and/or amended by resolution of Council. C. The Board shall act in an advisory capacity to Council in relation to matters regarding parks, recreation, cultural and infrastructure programs and services provided or to be provided by the Town. D. The Board may be consulted by Council on matters regarding parks, recreation, cultural and infrastructure programs and services provided or to be provided in the Town. E. The Board shall engage with and encourage the community to support and promote a broad range of recreation and cultural programs, parks and services that will provide the opportunity for all citizens to make use of their leisure time in a holistic, inclusive and rewarding manner. F. The Board shall carry out a bi-annual review and recommend to Council any necessary revisions to the Parks, Recreation and Culture Master Plan. G. The Board shall hear and consider representatives from any individual, organization or delegation of citizens on any matter concerning parks, recreation, cultural and infrastructure programs and services and make such recommendations to Council as the Board feels to be in the best interest of our community. Name of Bylaw Bylaw 893/2017 Page 4 of 6 114 H. The Board shall review Bylaw No. 893/2017 biennially (every two years). Recommendations for changes shall be submitted to Council for consideration as needed. I. The Board shall meet annually with Council. This Bylaw shall come into force and effect upon third reading by Council and Bylaw 664/99 is hereby rescinded upon this bylaw coming into effect. READ A FIRST TIME IN COUNCIL THIS xx day of xx, 2017 READ A SECOND TIME THIS xx day of xx, 2017 READ A THIRD AND FINAL TIME THIS xx day of xx, 2017 Stephen Lindop, Mayor Tony Kulbisky, Chief Administrative Officer Name of Bylaw Bylaw 893/2017 Page 5 of 6 115 SCHEDULE A TERMS OF REFERENCE PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURE BOARD Reports to: Mayor and Council The Board: Created by Bylaw of Council; Appointments made by Council Purpose: The Parks, Recreation and Culture Board was established by Council to advise Council on matters regarding parks, recreation and culture programs, services, and infrastructure in the Town as well as to act as stewards of the Parks, Recreation and Culture Master Plan. Responsibilities: 1. To cooperate with and encourage all community recreation and cultural individuals, organizations or delegations of citizens. 2. The Board Chair, Board Council representative and Town representative shall prepare for Council, an annual written report by the end of September outlining the activities of the Parks, Recreation and Culture Board for the preceding 12 months. 3. To receive as information, review, consider, or act, on all matters placed before it by Council or designate. 4. To review, consider or act, if required, on all matters referred to the Board by Council. 5. The Board’s authority does not extend to personnel matters or day to day operational matters. 6. The Board may submit written suggestions to Council at any time regarding: a) any item that is not covered in a plan already adopted by Council; b) changes to service levels; or c) changes to future projects or development priorities as stated in any adopted plan of Council. Name of Bylaw Bylaw 893/2017 Page 6 of 6 116 Request for Decision Date June 20 2017 RFD Prepared Month Day Year Devon Website Upgrade Recommended Action That Council accepts the Communication Coordinator’s presentation on the Devon website upgrade as information. Proposal and Background In early March it was determined through a meeting with the Town’s web developer Kelly Oltean and his company Webmonton that the Town’s website www.devon.ca had not received any significant upgrades since about 2010. Having not seen much attention in seven years, this was a great opportunity to work with Webmonton to upgrade the site to the newest platform. Some key improvements include: • URL Rewriter: This will allow for custom URLs on our web pages (i.e.: www.devon.ca/election would go directly to the elections page. • New Public Documents System: The upgraded site has a document listing that contains every document on the sign. This will allow our residents and stakeholders to find documents they are looking for much more quickly and efficiently. • Documents and Images: With the upgrade, our developer went through the back end of the website and removed EVERY file and image that is currently not on the website. This reduced the website from 1.65 GB to 700 MB and removed approximately 2000 files that were no longer on the website. • New Business Directory: The business directory on the previous website is very difficult to use. The new directory is cleaner and 10 times quicker to input or change information on. • New Calendar Module: The previous calendar used for the website has become obsolete so our developer installed an improved calendar module • Upgraded News and Article System: A new module will provide more options for displaying news and information on the front page of the site. • Content Staging: On the previous website, web pages were live right when they were published. The new upgraded site will allow for staging of content on the site to be published at a later date • SSL Security Addition: IT had identified that our current website did not have SSL security. The new site has the addition of SSL security meaning that all data passed between our web server and internet browsers will be encrypted and thus private. Devon Website Upgrade Agenda Item 8.3 Page 1 of 2 117 The work on the site has been fantastic and we are excited to launch it as soon as possible. Discussion on Benefits, Disadvantages and Options The upgraded site provided nothing but benefits for everyone. The URL rewriter will get residents directly to a page with friendly URLs that can be used on our print materials, social media images and more. Creating and updating pages is also considerably more user friendly with the upgraded site saving time and effort for those that are tasked with adding or updating content. Implementation/Communications We plan to make the new website live on Tuesday, June 27 pending any issues with the launch. The developer has assured us that he is confident there will be no issues launching the new site. To inform the public, a press release will be issued outlining the rationale for the upgrade and some key features. Devon’s social media will also be used to let residents and stakeholders about the upgraded site. Target Decision Date June 26 2017 Council Meeting Date Month Day Year Submitted By Justin Janke – Communications Coordinator Name / Title Reviewed By Tony Kulbisky, CLGM – Chief Administrative Officer Name / Title CAO Comments Support Recommended Action. Attachments 1. New Devon Website Overview Devon Website Upgrade Agenda Item 8.3 Page 2 of 2 118 New Devon Website Overview The new Devon website goes far beyond the term “upgrade”, it is a completely NEW website. Rather than upgrading overtop of the old system, we decided to completely rebuild the website under the latest version of the platform. In doing so, we effectively cleaned out any and all old data, modules, files, and images. As well, we also reduced the risk of old unused code files being exploited. Overall a very good decision and a smooth implementation with no major problems. With all the new changes, the website is in top notch shape, and allows for more robust changes to design and mobile architecture. Following are a list of key tasks that are notable regarding the new system and operation of it. General Upgrade and Cleanup Upgraded from DNN 6.29 to DNN 9.0.2 .. a major transition and improvement all around. Upgraded all modules to latest versions and/or replaced some. Reduced overall website page count from 205 to approx. 140. This includes old obsolete pages and streamlining within the admin pages. Total system file count reduction of approx. 2000 files. Overall website decrease in size from 1.65 GB to approx. 700 MB No unused files were moved to the new website. Everything on the new website is current and relevant. Key New Features/Implementations URL Rewriter – provides for human friendly URLs with ability to create alias URLs by page. Also creates extension-less URLs, no more .aspx at the end of every page. New HTML Editor – the new website uses the latest HTML editor, which generates much cleaner and correct HTML code (in the background) compared to the old version. Website editors, will quickly see the improved ease of use and performance. HTML Module Content Staging – previously all page edits were instantly live. The new website provides a draft, then publish system (lite version). This applies to all HTML modules which represent roughly 70% of the website. New Admin/Editor Interface – cleaner, simpler, yet more powerful. 119 New Contact Us Form Setup – previously the Contact Us page was quite complex in order to obscure email addresses from the raw web page code (to reduce spamming). This made it a bit tricky to add/edit new contacts, each requiring a distinct code action be setup. The new version eliminates all that and makes Contact Us page management easy. Just edit the record, no action to setup. New Business Directory System – previously the Business directory used a 3rd party module that far exceeded the simple task that was needed. This added complexity and made it more difficult to manage and also limiting in some key ways. The new version we built custom, and made it easier and more dynamic to work with. Editing records now is very intuitive and easy. We also incorporated 2 specific features requested by local businesses .. the ability to show/hide email and/or address information per business listing. Previously it was all or nothing. All previous business listings have been imported New Public Documents System – public documents are new to the website. In this initial implementation, we custom built a searchable, categorized database of documents, and devised a way to automatically and consistently name and store the files in two short steps. All current and relevant documents have been brought over New Form Builder – previously, forms were a difficult task to setup correctly, with lots of technical steps and details unfamiliar to common web editors. The new website uses a whole new forms module, making form generation a relative breeze. Easily create forms in a new intuitive form builder. All previous forms have been rebuilt in the new form builder and are active New Calendar System – the previous calendar system was a major roadblock in upgrading. The new calendar system is a more integrated solution and a part of a popular module suite, allowing for better display of all events and news articles. This applies primarily to the Community Centre Calendar and Community Events. All previous calendar dates have been brought over New News and Article system – We have introduced a new module suite to provide better display options, more features and capabilities, as well as better SEO and administrative options. This new system greatly reduces the administrative work of adding and managing news and article content. Some changes still to come. Previous news has been brought over going back to May 1, 2017 120 Page Content HTML All HTML has been revised page by page, all old or excessive formatting removed and/or cleaned up. Clean basic formatting for mobile adaptation. All links have been re-linked to new URLs and file names, tested to open and in appropriate target window. Set all external links and document links to open in a new window (a setting per each link). Old table structure converted to CSS layouts for mobile compatibility. Images All images have been renamed, resaved, and in some cases resized. Obsolete or unused images removed All images are now stored in an /images/ folder relevant to the page they appear on. Alt tag information added to all images. (better HTML validation) For example, an image appearing on the Visitors > Attractions page may be named “attractions-amberly- meadows.jpg, and that image would be stored in the “Images/Visitors/” folder. A best practice for working with images on large websites. Documents All documents have been renamed, resaved. Obsolete or unused documents removed All documents now use the same naming convention “YYYY-MM-DD-Title-of-Document_v1.pdf” All documents are stored in their respective folders, defined mostly by department. Documents folders now use the hyphens in place of spaces (recommended standard) Modules All modules in use have been upgraded to the latest version Several new modules have been introduced Old obsolete modules have been removed. A few new modules were custom built: Business Directory, Documents, and Contact Us list and Form. To summarize, we have reduced the use of several 3rd party modules in favor of fewer, more dynamic modules, making upgrading at later date much easier. Equally important is the idea that editing of these modules is much easier and more consistent across the website. 121 Summary Overall the new website is at the top of the list in terms of technical architecture and design, and moving forward, will provides a fantastic, stable, and secure platform to work with. We are very proud and confident with the work we have done on the new website. It has gone far beyond our original budget, still we delivered the best solution possible. There are a few minor areas to review and edit before launch, some of which cannot be done until we have switched over the live domain .. such as adding full SSL security to the website and implementing off site backups. 122 123 11.2a 124 11.2b 125 11.2c 126 11.3