DOCSLIB.ORG

(Macrochelys Temminckii) by the Phorid Fly Megaselia Scalaris

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(Macrochelys Temminckii) by the Phorid Fly Megaselia Scalaris September 2011 Notes 427 INFESTATION OF A NATURALLY INCUBATED NEST OF THE ALLIGATOR SNAPPING TURTLE (MACROCHELYS TEMMINCKII) BY THE PHORID FLY MEGASELIA SCALARIS SAMUEL R. HOLCOMB* AND JOHN L. CARR Department of Biology and Museum of Natural History, University of Louisiana at Monroe, Monroe, LA 71209-0520 Present Address of SRH: Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, P.O. Box 98000, Baton Rouge, LA 70898-9000 *Correspondent: [email protected] ABSTRACT—Larvae of the phorid fly Megaselia scalaris were in eggs in a naturally incubated nest of an alligator snapping turtle (Macrochelys temminckii). It appears that these larvae contributed to failure of this nest. Infestation by phorid larvae has been reported previously for eggs and nests of multiple species of turtles, but has not been reported from M. temminckii. RESUMEN—Larvas del dı´ptero Megaselia scalaris (Phoridae) fueron encontradas en los huevos de un nido de incubacio´n natural de la tortuga caima´n (Macrochelys temminckii). Parece que las larvas contribuyeron al fracaso del nido. Infestacio´n de huevos y nidos de varias especies de tortugas con larvas de moscas (Phoridae) se ha reportado anteriormente, pero no en M. temminckii. Infestation of turtle nests by flies is a common and nondeveloping eggs (Acun˜a-Mese´n and phenomenon, with dipteran larvae reported Hanson, 1990). It has been suggested that larvae from nests or eggs of multiple species of turtles of M. scalaris feed primarily on dead or weakened (e.g., McGowan et al., 2001; Hall and Parmenter, hatchlings (Fowler, 1979) and that adult M. 2008). Two dipteran families commonly report- scalaris may be attracted to odors associated with ed in nests are Sacrophagidae and Phoridae. rotting nonviable turtle eggs (Acun˜a-Mese´n and Larvae of Phoridae have been reported in nests Hanson, 1990; Broderick and Hancock, 1997; or eggs of the green sea turtle (Chelonia mydas; Saumure et al., 2006). However, Moll and Legler Fowler, 1979; McGowan et al., 2001), hawksbill (1971) reported that adult M. scalaris entered sea turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata; Bjorndal et al., turtle eggs through tears made by pipping 1985), loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta; hatchlings and oviposited on eyes and yolk sacs Broderick and Hancock, 1997; McGowan et al., of hatchlings, which subsequently died. 2001), eastern box turtle (Terrapene carolina; First-instar larvae of M. scalaris are small Ewing, 1933), Meso-American slider (Trachemys enough to enter rigid-shelled eggs through venusta; Moll and Legler, 1971), and painted pores in the eggshell (Acun˜a-Mese´n and wood turtle (Rhinoclemmys pulcherrima; Acun˜a- Hanson, 1990). There is no information about Mese´n and Hanson, 1990). the ability of such larvae to enter hard- The phorid most commonly identified from expansible eggs, such as those of alligator nests of turtles has been Megaselia scalaris,a snapping turtles (Macrochelys temminckii;Ewert, species in which the larvae feed on a broad 1979). Wolff (2007) reported that phorids will spectrum of decaying organic matter (Disney, deposit eggs on healthy chelonian eggs, so flies 2008). Megaselia scalaris is known as a scavenger, that initially are attracted to decaying eggs also facultative predator, parasitoid, and parasite may take advantage of normally developing (Disney, 2008), so it can be unclear whether eggs present in the nest. Some members of larvae of M. scalaris in nests of turtles are Phoridae are able to burrow #1 m into soil as scavengers or parasitoids (Broderick and Han- adults (Disney, 1994), which means that turtle cock, 1997). This already confusing situation is eggs potentially are vulnerable to infestation at further complicated by indications that M. any time during development (Broderick and scalaris is capable of attacking both developing Hancock, 1997). THE SOUTHWESTERN NATURALIST 56(3):427–429 428 The Southwestern Naturalist vol. 56, no. 3 Research on nesting ecology of M. temminckii developed hatchling, including bones, scutes, has been ongoing since 2002 at Black Bayou and nearly intact tail. The portion of the eggshell Lake National Wildlife Refuge, near Monroe, containing the two small holes was preserved in Ouachita Parish, Louisiana. Nesting by M. alcohol, along with some of the puparia. Similar temminckii at the refuge was concentrated pri- observations were made regarding four addition- marily along a railroad causeway, where nests al eggs. In addition, two eggs were as described suffered high levels of depredation by raccoons, above, but also had fly puparia on the outside of Procyon lotor (Woosley, 2005). To find nests the eggshell. Three other eggs had small holes, before they were destroyed, surveys were per- remains of hatchlings, and internal puparia, but formed daily during nesting season in April and the eggs were invaginated so that the egg had a May, and all intact or partially intact nests were bowl-shaped appearance. This could have been covered with a predator excluder. We found a the result of dehydration of the egg caused by total of 11 nests in 2008, three of which were feeding of larval flies (Acun˜a-Mese´n and Han- depredated by mammals before we found them; son, 1990). One egg had small holes and fly the other 8 were intact or partially intact. For all puparia, but no remains of a hatchling. This egg intact (n 5 5), and two partially intact nests, the presumably was infertile, or experienced early nest-cavity was carefully excavated and the clutch embryonic death, and was entirely consumed by was divided in two. One-half of the clutch was fly larvae. Three eggs had large tears in the returned carefully to the nest and reburied in a eggshell, such as would be caused by a pipping manner similar to arrangement of the original hatchling, as well as remains of hatchlings and fly nest, and the other one-half was taken back to puparia. The 15th egg was not recovered from the lab for incubation. Eggs left in the nest were the nest, although there were several pieces of covered with a predator excluder, which consist- eggshell from another egg. A total of 14 adult ed of a ca. 1-m square piece of 1.3-cm-mesh flies were recovered from inside five of the eggs hardware cloth staked to the ground, and were and the flies were identified as M. scalaris; six left to incubate naturally. Nests were monitored, voucher specimens were deposited in the Louisi- but left undisturbed until well after estimated ana State Arthropod Museum at Louisiana State date of hatching based upon hatching in the lab University (LSAM 0154233-0154238). and data from previous field seasons. Two nests It appears that phorid flies played a significant were lost during incubation to mammalian role in failure of this nest of M. temminckii.Thefact predators despite use of predator excluders, that no living M. scalaris was recovered, coupled which resulted in a total of five nests that were with the fact that empty puparia persist long after monitored through the end of incubation. the adult fly has emerged (Disney, 2008) would be The first nest in 2008 was found on 26 April consistent with infestation of this nest at pipping, and contained a clutch of 30 eggs. Of these, 15 as described by Moll and Legler (1971), and eggs were replaced in the nest and were not indicates that the flies had completed their life disturbed again until excavation of all nests of M. cycle long before the nest was excavated. Pipping temminckii in the field was undertaken on 5 in M. temminckii is asynchronous, so a plausible December. As of that date, there had been no scenario is one in which flies were attracted to the emergence of hatchlings from the nest and the first eggs that pipped, and then proceeded to lay nest did not fall victim to above-ground depre- eggs not only on the pipped hatchlings, but also dation. When the nest was excavated, eggs were on the remainder of the clutch. Thus, remaining placed into resealable plastic bags and returned eggs were infested with fly larvae, which killed to the lab where they were refrigerated until they embryonic turtles in situ, leaving behind only were dissected in an attempt to determine cause indigestible scutes, bones, and tails. This could of failure of the nest. When the first egg was explain why only a few eggs in this clutch appeared examined, two small holes were noted in the to have pipped, yet most eggs contained remains eggshell. These small holes were measured, of well-developed hatchlings that seem to have along with similar holes (an average of 1.3 been close to pipping, at ca. stage 25–26 (Yntema, holes/egg, n 5 17) in other eggs, and averaged 1968). A similar scenario was described for a 1.45 by 1.60 mm (n 5 8). On the inside of the sarcophagid fly by Bolton et al. (2008), who eggshell, many empty fly puparia were noted, as suggested that female flies may be attracted by well as remains of what appeared to be a fully olfactory cues associated with hatching. It seems September 2011 Notes 429 likely that the first-instar larvae of M. scalaris would nurga importuna (Walker) (Diptera: Sacrophagi- be able to enter intact eggs of M. temminckii.Eggs dae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 86:151–160. of the confamilial eastern snapping turtle (Chely- BRODERICK, A. C., AND E. G. HANCOCK. 1997. Insect dra serpentina) have the same type of eggshell infestation of Mediterranean marine turtle eggs. (Ewert, 1979) and are characterized by arrange- Herpetological Review 28:190–191. DISNEY, R. H. L. 1994. Scuttle flies: the Phoridae. ment of the mineral layer into groups of shell Chapman and Hall, London, United Kingdom.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • N.C. Turtles Checklist
    Checklist of Turtles Historically Encountered In Coastal North Carolina by John Hairr, Keith Rittmaster and Ben Wunderly North Carolina Maritime Museums Compiled June 1, 2016 Suborder Family Common Name Scientific Name Conservation Status Testudines Cheloniidae loggerhead Caretta caretta Threatened green turtle Chelonia mydas Threatened hawksbill Eretmochelys imbricata Endangered Kemp’s ridley Lepidochelys kempii Endangered Dermochelyidae leatherback Dermochelys coriacea Endangered Chelydridae common snapping turtle Chelydra serpentina Emydidae eastern painted turtle Chrysemys picta spotted turtle Clemmys guttata eastern chicken turtle Deirochelys reticularia diamondback terrapin Malaclemys terrapin Special concern river cooter Pseudemys concinna redbelly turtle Pseudemys rubriventris eastern box turtle Terrapene carolina yellowbelly slider Trachemys scripta Kinosternidae striped mud turtle Kinosternon baurii eastern mud turtle Kinosternon subrubrum common musk turtle Sternotherus odoratus Trionychidae spiny softshell Apalone spinifera Special concern NOTE: This checklist was compiled and updated from several sources, both in the scientific and popular literature. For scientific names, we have relied on: Turtle Taxonomy Working Group [van Dijk, P.P., Iverson, J.B., Rhodin, A.G.J., Shaffer, H.B., and Bour, R.]. 2014. Turtles of the world, 7th edition: annotated checklist of taxonomy, synonymy, distribution with maps, and conservation status. In: Rhodin, A.G.J., Pritchard, P.C.H., van Dijk, P.P., Saumure, R.A., Buhlmann, K.A., Iverson, J.B., and Mittermeier, R.A. (Eds.). Conservation Biology of Freshwater Turtles and Tortoises: A Compilation Project of the IUCN/SSC Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group. Chelonian Research Monographs 5(7):000.329–479, doi:10.3854/crm.5.000.checklist.v7.2014; The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.
    [Show full text]
  • The Common Snapping Turtle, Chelydra Serpentina
    The Common Snapping Turtle, Chelydra serpentina Rylen Nakama FISH 423: Olden 12/5/14 Figure 1. The Common Snapping Turtle, one of the most widespread reptiles in North America. Photo taken in Quebec, Canada. Image from https://www.flickr.com/photos/yorthopia/7626614760/. Classification Order: Testudines Family: Chelydridae Genus: Chelydra Species: serpentina (Linnaeus, 1758) Previous research on Chelydra serpentina (Phillips et al., 1996) acknowledged four subspecies, C. s. serpentina (Northern U.S. and Figure 2. Side profile of Chelydra serpentina. Note Canada), C. s. osceola (Southeastern U.S.), C. s. the serrated posterior end of the carapace and the rossignonii (Central America), and C. s. tail’s raised central ridge. Photo from http://pelotes.jea.com/AnimalFact/Reptile/snapturt.ht acutirostris (South America). Recent IUCN m. reclassification of chelonians based on genetic analyses (Rhodin et al., 2010) elevated C. s. rossignonii and C. s. acutirostris to species level and established C. s. osceola as a synonym for C. s. serpentina, thus eliminating subspecies within C. serpentina. Antiquated distinctions between the two formerly recognized North American subspecies were based on negligible morphometric variations between the two populations. Interbreeding in the overlapping range of the two populations was well documented, further discrediting the validity of the subspecies distinction (Feuer, 1971; Aresco and Gunzburger, 2007). Therefore, any emphasis of subspecies differentiation in the ensuing literature should be disregarded. Figure 3. Front-view of a captured Chelydra Continued usage of invalid subspecies names is serpentina. Different skin textures and the distinctive pink mouth are visible from this angle. Photo from still prevalent in the exotic pet trade for C.
    [Show full text]
  • In AR, FL, GA, IA, KY, LA, MO, OH, OK, SC, TN, and TX): Species in Red = Depleted to the Point They May Warrant Federal Endangered Species Act Listing
    Southern and Midwestern Turtle Species Affected by Commercial Harvest (in AR, FL, GA, IA, KY, LA, MO, OH, OK, SC, TN, and TX): species in red = depleted to the point they may warrant federal Endangered Species Act listing Common snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina) – AR, GA, IA, KY, MO, OH, OK, SC, TX Florida common snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina osceola) - FL Southern painted turtle (Chrysemys dorsalis) – AR Western painted turtle (Chrysemys picta) – IA, MO, OH, OK Spotted turtle (Clemmys gutatta) - FL, GA, OH Florida chicken turtle (Deirochelys reticularia chrysea) – FL Western chicken turtle (Deirochelys reticularia miaria) – AR, FL, GA, KY, MO, OK, TN, TX Barbour’s map turtle (Graptemys barbouri) - FL, GA Cagle’s map turtle (Graptemys caglei) - TX Escambia map turtle (Graptemys ernsti) – FL Common map turtle (Graptemys geographica) – AR, GA, OH, OK Ouachita map turtle (Graptemys ouachitensis) – AR, GA, OH, OK, TX Sabine map turtle (Graptemys ouachitensis sabinensis) – TX False map turtle (Graptemys pseudogeographica) – MO, OK, TX Mississippi map turtle (Graptemys pseuogeographica kohnii) – AR, TX Alabama map turtle (Graptemys pulchra) – GA Texas map turtle (Graptemys versa) - TX Striped mud turtle (Kinosternon baurii) – FL, GA, SC Yellow mud turtle (Kinosternon flavescens) – OK, TX Common mud turtle (Kinosternon subrubrum) – AR, FL, GA, OK, TX Alligator snapping turtle (Macrochelys temminckii) – AR, FL, GA, LA, MO, TX Diamond-back terrapin (Malaclemys terrapin) – FL, GA, LA, SC, TX River cooter (Pseudemys concinna) – AR, FL,
    [Show full text]
  • THE ECOLOGY of the ALLIGATOR SNAPPING TURTLE, Macrochelys Femminckii, in OKLAHOMA
    THE ECOLOGY OF THE ALLIGATOR SNAPPING TURTLE, Macrochelys temminckii, IN OKLAHOMA By JIMMY DAREN RIEDLE Bachelor ofScience Emporia State University Emporia, Kansas 1995 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College ofthe Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE December 2001 THE ECOLOGY OF THE ALLIGATOR SNAPPING TURTLE, Macrochelys temminckii, IN OKLAHOMA ----~--=----,D:::::-~Gr~-ge---- II ACKNOWLEDGMENTS There are many individuals and organizations that I would like to thank for their support, encouragement, and motivation towards completing this project. I wish to express my deepest gratitude towards my major advisor, Dr. Stanley F. Fox for his guidance, advice and just giving me a chance. I also would like to thank my other committee members, Dr. David M. Leslie, Jr. and Or. Chuck C. Peterson for their guidance. I extend my deepest gratitude to myoId friend Paul Shipman for many fine field trips in many fine locales and for forcibly coercing me into taking over this project in the first place. I also want to thank Steve Beredzen at Sequoyah National Wildlife Refuge, Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation, and the Oklahoma Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit for financial, and logistical support. I extend extra appreciation to Shane Kasson, Gary Williams, and the rest of the crew at equoyah National Wildlife Refuge for putting up with me on a daily basis and providing me with the occasional evening entertainment and free beer. I wish to express a special thanks to all the people, both paid employees and volunteers who helped me in the field during the course ofthis project.
    [Show full text]
  • Sea Turtles : the Importance of Sea Turtles to Marine Ecosystems
    PHOTO TIM CALVER WHY HEALTHY OCEANS NEED SEA TURTLES : THE IMPORTANCE OF SEA TURTLES TO MARINE ECOSYSTEMS Wilson, E.G., Miller, K.L., Allison, D. and Magliocca, M. oceana.org/seaturtles S E L T R U T Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Karen Bjorndal for her review of this report. We would also like to thank The Streisand Foundation for their support of Oceana’s work to save sea turtles. PHOTO MICHAEL STUBBLEFIELD OCEANA | Protecting the World’s Oceans TABLE OF CONTENTS WHY HEALTHY OCEANS NEED SEA TURTLES 3 Executive Summary 4 U.S. Sea Turtles 5 Importance of Sea Turtles to Healthy Oceans 6 Maintaining Habitat Importance of Green Sea Turtles on Seagrass Beds Impact of Hawksbill Sea Turtles on Coral Reefs Benefit of Sea Turtles to Beach Dunes 9 Maintaining a Balanced Food Web Sea Turtles and Jellyfish Sea Turtles Provide Food for Fish 11 Nutrient Cycling Loggerheads Benefit Ocean Floor Ecosystems Sea Turtles Improve Nesting Beaches 12 Providing Habitat 14 The Risk of Ecological Extinction 15 Conclusions oceana.org/seaturtles 1 S E L T R U T PHOTO TIM CALVER 2 OCEANA | Protecting the World’s Oceans EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Sea turtles have played vital roles in maintaining the health of the world’s oceans for more than 100 million years. These roles range from maintaining productive coral reef ecosystems to transporting essential nutrients from the oceans to beaches and coastal dunes. Major changes have occurred in the oceans because sea turtles have been virtually eliminated from many areas of the globe. Commercial fishing, loss of nesting habitat and climate change are among the human-caused threats pushing sea turtles towards extinction.
    [Show full text]
  • The Natural History & Distribution of Riverine Turtles in West Virginia
    Marshall University Marshall Digital Scholar Theses, Dissertations and Capstones 2010 The aN tural History & Distribution of Riverine Turtles in West Virginia Linh Diem Phu Follow this and additional works at: http://mds.marshall.edu/etd Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Phu, Linh Diem, "The aN tural History & Distribution of Riverine Turtles in West Virginia" (2010). Theses, Dissertations and Capstones. Paper 787. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Marshall Digital Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses, Dissertations and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Marshall Digital Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Natural History & Distribution of Riverine Turtles in West Virginia Thesis submitted to the Graduate College of Marshall University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Biological Sciences By Linh Diem Phu Dr. Thomas K. Pauley, Ph.D., Committee Chairperson Dr. Dan Evans, Ph.D. Dr. Suzanne Strait, Ph.D. Marshall University May 2010 Abstract Turtles are unique evolutionary marvels that evolved from amphibians and developed their protective shelled form more than 200 million years ago. In West Virginia, there are 10 native species of turtles, 9 of which are aquatic. Most of these aquatic turtles feed on carrion and dead plant matter, in the water and essentially "clean" our water systems. Turtles are long-lived animals with sensitive life stages that can serve as both long-term and short-term bioindicators of environmental health. With the increase in commercial trade, habitat fragmentation, degradation, destruction, there has been a marked decline in turtle species.
    [Show full text]
  • Turtles of the Upper Mississippi River System
    TURTLES OF THE UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER SYSTEM Tom R. Johnson and Jeffrey T. Briggler Herpetologists Missouri Department of Conservation Jefferson City, MO March 27, 2012 Background: A total of 13 species and subspecies of turtles are known to live in the Upper Mississippi River, its backwaters and tributaries. There are a few species that could be found occasionally, but would likely account for less than 5% of the species composition of any area. These species are predominantly marsh animals and are discussed in a separate section of this paper. For additional information on turtle identification and natural history see Briggler and Johnson (2006), Christiansen and Bailey (1988), Conant and Collins (1998), Ernst and Lovich (2009), Johnson (2000), and Vogt (1981). This information is provided to the fisheries field staff of the LTRM project so they will be able to identify the turtles captured during fish monitoring. The most current taxonomic information of turtles was used to compile this material. The taxonomy followed in this publication is the Scientific and Standard English Names of Amphibians and Reptiles of North America North of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding (6th edition) by Crothers (2008). Species Identification, Natural History and Distribution: What follows is a synopsis of the 13 turtle species and subspecies which are known to occur in the Upper Mississippi River environs. Species composition changes between the upper and lower reaches of the LTRM study area (Wisconsin/Minnesota state line and southeastern Missouri) due to changes in aquatic habitats. For example, the Northern Map Turtle (Graptemys geographica) is abundant in the northern portion of the river with clearer water and abundant snail prey.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Rainfall on Loggerhead Turtle Nest Temperatures, Sand Temperatures and Hatchling Sex
    Vol. 28: 235–247, 2015 ENDANGERED SPECIES RESEARCH Published online October 7 doi: 10.3354/esr00684 Endang Species Res OPENPEN ACCESSCCESS Effect of rainfall on loggerhead turtle nest temperatures, sand temperatures and hatchling sex Alexandra Lolavar, Jeanette Wyneken* Department of Biological Sciences, Florida Atlantic University, 777 Glades Rd, Boca Raton, FL, USA ABSTRACT: Marine turtles deposit their eggs in underground nests where they develop unattended and without parental care. Incubation temperature varies with environmental conditions, including rainfall, sun/shade and sand type, and affects developmental rates, hatch and emergence success, and embryonic sex. We documented (1) rainfall and sand temperature relationships and (2) rainfall, nest temperatures and hatchling sex ratios at a loggerhead turtle (Caretta caretta) nesting beach in Boca Raton, Florida, USA, across the 2010 to 2013 nesting seasons. Rainfall data collected concur- rently with sand temperatures at different depths showed that light rainfall affected surface sand; effects of the heaviest rainfall events tended to lower sand temperatures but the temperature fluctu- ations were small once upper nest depths were reached. This is important in understanding the po- tential impacts of rainfall as a modifier of nest temperatures, as such changes can be quite small. Nest temperature profiles were synchronized with rainfall data from weather services to identify re- lationships with hatchling sex ratios. The sex of each turtle was verified laparoscopically to provide empirical measures of sex ratio for the nest and nesting beach. The majority of hatchlings in the samples were female, suggesting that across the 4 seasons most nest temperatures were not suffi- ciently cool to produce males.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Name: ALLIGATOR SNAPPING TURTLE
    Common Name: ALLIGATOR SNAPPING TURTLE Scientific Name: Macrochelys temminckii (Harlan) Other Commonly Used Names: loggerhead turtle, alligator turtle Previously Used Scientific Names: Macroclemys temminckii Family: Chelydridae Rarity Ranks: G3G4/S3 State Legal Status: Threatened Federal Legal Status: none Description: One of the largest freshwater turtle species in the world, the alligator snapping turtle may obtain weights over 100 kg (220 lbs) and carapace lengths up to 80 cm (31½ inches). The carapace is broad and relatively flat and bears three jagged ridges along its length, prominent in all but the oldest of individuals. In addition, the presence of 1-5 (usually 2-3 in Georgia individuals) supramarginal scutes is unique to this species. The carapace is dark-brown to reddish-brown and patternless. The similarly colored plastron is very reduced and cross-shaped. The enormous head, which has earned it the nickname "loggerhead," is triangular in shape and has an elongated snout with strongly hooked jaws. The skin is typically dark brown in color, but some individuals may be flesh-colored. Many small dermal projections are present on the chin and neck. The relatively long tail has three dorsal rows of tubercles. Similar Species: Common snapping turtles (Chelydra serpentina) are similar in color and general appearance but have less conspicuous carapace ridges, a much smaller head with no elongation of the snout, lack supramarginal scutes, and have a jagged keel on the tail. Further, common snappers are frequently seen on land while alligator snappers almost never leave the water except to nest. Habitat: Large streams and rivers (and associated impoundments) draining to the Gulf of Mexico are the habitat for this reptile.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Annual Meeting of the Turtle Survival Alliance and Iucn Tortoise & Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group
    JOINT ANNUAL MEETING OF THE TURTLE SURVIVAL ALLIANCE AND IUCN TORTOISE & FRESHWATER TURTLE SPECIALIST GROUP 7TH ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM ON THE CONSERVATION AND BIOLOGY OF TORTOISES AND FRESHWATER TURTLES PROGRAM AND ABSTRACTS ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI, USA AUGUST 5-8, 2009 CONFERENCE SPONSOR CONFERENCE HOST ADDITIONAL SUPPORT GENEROUSLY PROVIDED BY BRETT AND NANCY STEARNS, CHELONIAN RESEARCH FOUNDATION, REPTILES MAGAZINE AND CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL Burmese roof turtle painting commemorates one of TSA’s signature conservation programs This is the second in a series of turtle paintings by noted reptile artist Tell Hicks that commemorate TSA programs to save critically endangered species. The Burmese roof turtle print is timely in that it comes on the heels of two significant milestones in this program’s history: the Species Recovery Plan workshop held January 2009 and the first worldwide captive breeding for this species in 2008, both occurring in Mandalay, Myanmar. The enigmatic Burmese roof turtle, Batagur (Kachuga) trivittata, had not been recorded by scientists since the 1930’s and was “rediscovered” in 2002 when specimens turned up in a Hong Kong market and in a Mandalay temple pond. Gerald Kuchling is credited with recognizing the specimens - a male and two females - in the temple pond and took decisive action to move them to the Yadanabon Zoo to start a captive breeding program. His efforts to locate remnant wild populations were successful and he was able to further expand the captive population. Gerald Kuchling’s landmark effort to save B. trivittata is just one of the reasons that he was selected as the recipient of the 2009 John Behler Chelonian Conservation Award.
    [Show full text]
  • A Field Guide to South Dakota Turtles
    A Field Guide to SOUTH DAKOTA TURTLES EC919 South Dakota State University | Cooperative Extension Service | USDA U.S. Geological Survey | South Dakota Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit South Dakota Department of Game, Fish & Parks This publication may be cited as: Bandas, Sarah J., and Kenneth F. Higgins. 2004. Field Guide to South Dakota Turtles. SDCES EC 919. Brookings: South Dakota State University. Copies may be obtained from: Dept. of Wildlife & Fisheries Sciences South Dakota State University Box 2140B, NPBL Brookings SD 57007-1696 South Dakota Dept of Game, Fish & Parks 523 E. Capitol, Foss Bldg Pierre SD 57501 SDSU Bulletin Room ACC Box 2231 Brookings, SD 57007 (605) 688–4187 A Field Guide to SOUTH DAKOTA TURTLES EC919 South Dakota State University | Cooperative Extension Service | USDA U.S. Geological Survey | South Dakota Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit South Dakota Department of Game, Fish & Parks Sarah J. Bandas Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences South Dakota State University NPB Box 2140B Brookings, SD 57007 Kenneth F. Higgins U.S. Geological Survey South Dakota Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit South Dakota State University NPB Box 2140B Brookings, SD 57007 Contents 2 Introduction . .3 Status of South Dakota turtles . .3 Fossil record and evolution . .4 General turtle information . .4 Taxonomy of South Dakota turtles . .9 Capturing techniques . .10 Turtle handling . .10 Turtle habitats . .13 Western Painted Turtle (Chrysemys picta bellii) . .15 Snapping Turtle (Chelydra serpentina) . .17 Spiny Softshell Turtle (Apalone spinifera) . .19 Smooth Softshell Turtle (Apalone mutica) . .23 False Map Turtle (Graptemys pseudogeographica) . .25 Western Ornate Box Turtle (Terrapene ornata ornata) .
    [Show full text]
  • North Louisiana Refuges Complex: Freshwater Turtle Inventory
    NORTH LOUISIANA REFUGES COMPLEX: FRESHWATER TURTLE INVENTORY USFWS Award No: F17PX01556 John L. Carr, Aaron C. Johnson & J. Benjamin Grizzle November 2020 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4 Inventory and Monitoring Branch for USFWS Award No. F17PX01556, “Freshwater Turtle Inventory of the North Louisiana Refuges Complex”. In addition, this report incorporates data from other, complementary projects that were funded by a variety of sources. This has been done in order to provide a more fulsome picture of knowledge on the turtle fauna of the refuges within the Complex. These other projects were funded in part by the Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Federal Aid, through the State Wildlife Grants Program (series of projects targeting the Alligator Snapping Turtle and map turtles). Other sources include data collected for grant activities funded by USGS-BRD (Cooperative Agreement No. 99CRAG0017), funding from the Louisiana Wildlife and Fisheries Foundation beginning in 1998, funding directly from LDWF (2000-2002), The Nature Conservancy (contract #LAFO_022309), Friends of Black Bayou, the Turtle Research Fund of the University of Louisiana at Monroe Foundation, and the Kitty DeGree Professorship in Biology (2011-2017). U.S. Fish and Wildlife personnel helped facilitate our work by granting access to all parts of the refuges at various times, and providing a series of Special Use Permits over 20+ years. We acknowledge Lee Fulton, Joe McGowan, Brett Hortman, Kelby Ouchley, and George Chandler for facilitating our work on refuges over the years; in particular, we thank Gypsy Hanks for long-sustained support and cooperation, especially during the course of the current project.
    [Show full text]