Policy and Operations Evaluation Department EVALUATION of THE
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
iob policy and operations evaluation department EVALUATION OF THE JOINT INTEGRATED TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMME COUNTRY REPORTS OF BURKINA FASO AND TANZANIA PIET LANSER AND PAUL WIJMENGA (ECORYS/NEI ROTTERDAM) & PAULO MWAZYUNGA (INTERMAECOS LIMITED) IOB Working Document | June 2004 ii PREFACE A major objective of Netherlands’ foreign policy is the integration of developing countries in the world trading system. Trade-Related Technical Assistance (TRTA) is considered one of the key instruments to contribute to this integration, next to removal of trade barriers to developing countries. TRTA is a collective term for different types of technical assistance aimed at strengthening the trade-related knowledge base, trade-related negotiation capacity, national trade policy and/or capacity to trade of developing countries. Whereas many donors and agencies have strongly committed themselves at ministerial conferences of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) to the provision of TRTA, little is known about the results of such assistance. Though the percentage of Official Development Assistance spent on TRTA has been declared an indicator of the Millennium Development Objective of ‘further developing an open trading and financial system that is rule-based, predictable and non-discriminatory’, very few question actual effects. To assess the efficiency, effectiveness, and relevance of various types of TRTA as supported by the Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs, IOB started an evaluation of this instrument in June 2003. A major element of this evaluation is the assessment of results of seven selected programmes: four multilateral programmes and three international NGOs or intergovernmental organisations. Each of them is considered to be exemplary of the strategic principle of the Netherlands of providing support through multilateral channels and international organisations. This document contains the results of the evaluation of the Joint Integrated Technical Assistance Programme (JITAP) in Burkina Faso (Part A) and Tanzania (Part B). In three separate IOB-working documents the results have been published of the evaluations of the Integrated Framework (IF) in Ethiopia and Yemen, two major TRTA-programmes of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), and three Geneva-based international NGOs or intergovernmental organisations (ACWL, AITIC and QUNO). IOB publishes such documents to make (interim and data-rich) products of IOB evaluations accessible to stakeholders, specialists and a wider public interested in results of development aid (see www.euforic.org/iob for electronic versions). A team of consultants of ECORYS-NEI has conducted the measurements of results of the seven selected programmes, following the general terms of reference for the IOB-evaluation and specifying these in a design for the measurement of results of the selected programmes. The team consisted of Mr. Paul Wijmenga (lead consultant), Mr. Piet Lanser, Mr. Richard Liebrechts and Mrs. Nora Plaisier. The evaluation research of JITAP in Tanzania was done by Mr. Paul Wijmenga from November 19th till December 6th of 2003. After completion of his field work, he de-briefed Mr. Piet Lanser, who subsequently conducted the evaluation research of JITAP in Burkina iii Faso from January 12th till 26th of 2004. On behalf of IOB the team was supervised by Dr. Otto Hospes, who as evaluator of IOB also takes responsibility for the overall evaluation of TRTA. Rob D. van den Berg Director Policy and Operations Evaluation Department (IOB) June 2004 iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Several rounds of comments authors – including a workshop – were organised to discuss the draft evaluation reports of the ECORYS-NEI consultants. These rounds involved Netherlands embassies, executive directors of organisations targeted in the IOB-evaluation, two IOB-readers and six external readers. Special and sincere thanks go to Mr. Leendert F. Noort (Netherlands Embassy, Ouagadougou) and Mr. Jacob Wiersma (Netherlands Embassy, Dar es Salaam) for collecting and providing comments on an earlier draft of the evaluation report. Mr. Robert Malin was very helpful as language editor. Hélène de Jong and Ingeborg Ponne, supporting staff of IOB, skilfully upgraded the format of the working document to match IOB standards. The authors accept responsibility for any error or lack of clarity that may be left. Finally, the authors – together with IOB – hope that the series of working documents on TRTA will contribute to the international debate on the role and results of the selected providers of TRTA and can be helpful for the methodological design of new evaluations meant to assess results of TRTA. v vi ACRONYMS ACP African Caribbean Pacific AGOA African Growth Opportunity Act AoA Agreement on Agriculture BEST Business Environment Strengthening for Tanzania BET Board of External Trade CB Capacity Building CBE College for Business Education CBI Centre for Promotion of Imports from Developing Countries CCIA-B Chambre de Commerce, d’Industrie et d’Artisanat du Burkina Faso CDF Communication and Discussion Facility CEDEAO French acronym of ECOWAS CESAO Centre d’Etudes Économiques et Sociales pour L’Afrique de l’Ouest CNPB Conseil National du Patronat Burkinabé CNSC/OMC Cellule nationals de Suivi et de Coordination des Accords de l’OMC COMESA Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa CTF Common Trust Fund DDE Directorate for Sustainable Economic Development DTIS Diagnostic Trade Integration Study EAC East African Co-operation EC European Commission ECOWAS Economic Community of West African States EPA Economic Partnership Agreement EU European Union FASONORM Burkinabé Bureau of Standards GATS General Agreement on Trade in Services IIC Inter Institutional Committee IF Integrated Framework IFM Institute of Finance Management IIC Inter-Institutional Committee IITC Inter-Institutional Technical Committee IMTS Institute on Multilateral Trade System IOB Policy and Operations Evaluation Department ITC International Trade Centre JITAP Joint Integrated Technical Assistance Programme LDC Least Developed Country MCPEA Ministère du Commerce, de la Promotion de l’Entreprise et de l’Artisanat MIT Ministry of Industry & Trade MOL Minst Ontwikkelde Landen MTR Mid Term Review MTS Multilateral Trading System NEP National Enquiry Point NGO Non-Governmental Organisation NTA National Technical Advisor NSC National Steering Committee OHADA Organization for Harmonization of Business Law in Africa OMC French acronym of WTO ONAC Office National du Commerce Extérieur PESP Programme of Economic Cooperation Projects vii PRS(P) Poverty Reduction Strategy (Paper) PS Permanent Secretary PSI Pre-shipment Inspection PUM Retiring Managers Programme RNE Royal Netherlands Embassy RoO Rules of Origin RTA Regional Trade Agreements SADC South African Development Community S&D Special and Differential treatment SME Small and Medium Enterprise SPCPSA Secrétariat Permanent de la Coordination des Politiques Sectorielles Agricoles SPS Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures TA Technical Assistance TBS Tanzanian Bureau of Standards TBT Technical Barriers to Trade TCCIA Tanzania Chamber of Commerce, Industry and Agriculture TIC Tanzania Investment Centre TRIMS Trade-Related Investment Measures TRIPS Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Structure TSHS Tanzanian Shillings TTPP Tanzania Trade and Poverty Programme TRA Tanzania Revenue Authority TRTA Trade-Related Technical Assistance UEMOA French acronym of WAEMU UK United Kingdom UNCTAD United Nations Conference on Trade and Development UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNIDO United Nations Industrial Development Organisation USD United States Dollar WAEMU West African Economic and Monetary Union WTO World Trade Organisation viii CONTENTS Preface iii Acknowledgements v Acronyms vii PART A: JITAP IN BURKINA FASO 1INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background information on JITAP 1 1.2 Trade Policy Regime of Burkina Faso 2 1.3 Trade Performance of Burkina Faso 5 1.4 Presence of JITAP agencies in Burkina Faso 10 1.4.1 WTO 10 1.4.2 ITC 10 1.4.3 UNCTAD 10 1.4.4 UNDP 10 1.5 Donor coordination and trade related programmes of main donors 10 1.5.1 JITAP donor partners 10 1.5.2 Canada 11 1.5.3 French cooperation 11 1.5.4 Finland 12 1.5.5 World Bank 12 1.5.6 European Commission 12 1.5.7 Netherlands 13 2 JITAP SITUATION IN BURKINA FASO 15 2.1 Preparatory phase of JITAP I 15 2.2 Implementation of JITAP I 15 2.3 Consolidation phase of JITAP I 16 2.4 Preparatory phase of JITAP II 16 3MEASURING JITAP PERFORMANCE IN BURKINA FASO 17 3.1 Input 17 3.2 Output 18 3.3 Outcome 21 3.4 Impact 26 4ASSESSING JITAP PERFORMANCE IN BURKINA FASO 31 4.1 Efficiency 31 4.2 Effectiveness 33 4.3 Relevance 34 4.4 Specific issues 36 4.4.1 Ownership 36 4.4.2 Coordination 36 4.4.3 Beneficiaries 38 4.4.4 Follow-up of earlier evaluations 38 4.4.5 Future performance 39 4.5 Conclusion and policy issues 41 ix PART B: JITAP IN TANZANIA 1INTRODUCTION 45 1.1 Background information on JITAP 45 1.2 Trade Policy Regime of Tanzania 46 1.3 Trade Performance of Tanzania 49 1.4 Presence of JITAP agencies in Tanzania 54 1.4.1 WTO 54 1.4.2 ITC 54 1.4.3 UNCTAD 55 1.4.4 Integrated Framework 55 1.5 Existing trade-related programmes of main bilateral donors 55 1.5.1 SIDA 55 1.5.2 DANIDA 56 1.5.3 United Kingdom 56 1.5.4 Netherlands 57 2 JITAP SITUATION IN TANZANIA 59 2.1 Preparatory phase of JITAP I 59 2.2 Implementation of JITAP I 59 2.3 Consolidation phase of JITAP I 60 2.4 Preparatory phase of JITAP II 60 3MEASURING JITAP PERFORMANCE IN TANZANIA 63 3.1 Input