Civilians, Soldiers, and Environment in Northern

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Civilians, Soldiers, and Environment in Northern THE HIGHLANDS WAR: CIVILIANS, SOLDIERS, AND ENVIRONMENT IN NORTHERN NEW JERSEY, 1777-1781 ________________________________________________________________________ A Dissertation Submitted to The Temple University Graduate School Board In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY by Steven Elliott December 2018 Examining Committee Members: Gregory J.W. Urwin, History Andrew C. Isenberg, History Jessica Chopin Roney, History Mark Edward Lender, History i © Copyright 2018 Bv Steven Elliott All Rights Reserved ii ABSTRACT This dissertations studies the problem of military shelter and its impact on the Continental Army‘s conduct during the War of American Independence. It examines ideas and practices about military housing during the eighteenth century; how Continental officers sought and obtained lodging for themselves and their men, refinements in military camp administration; how military decisions regarding shelter affected strategy, logistics, and social relationships within the army; as well as how quartering practices structured relations between civilians and the military. This dissertation maintains a geographic focus on Northwestern New Jersey, a region it defines as the Highlands, because this area witnessed a Continental Army presence of greater size and duration than anywhere else in the rebelling Thirteen Colonies. Using official military correspondence, orderly books, diaries, memoirs, civilian damage claims, and archaeological studies, this dissertation reveals that developments in military shelter formed a crucial yet overlooked component of Continental strategy. Patriot soldiers began the war with inadequate housing for operations in the field as well as winter quarters, and their health and morale suffered accordingly. In the second half of the war, Continental officers devised a new method of accommodating their men, the log-hut city. This complex of hastily-built timber huts provided cover for Patriot troops from the winter of 1777-1778 through the end of the war. This method, unknown in Europe, represented an innovation in the art of war. By providing accommodations secure from enemy attack for thousands of soldiers at little cost to the government and little inconvenience to civilians, the log-hut city made a decisive contribution to the success of the Continental Army‘s war effort. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The completion of the dissertation would not have been possible without the support of a number individuals and institutions. First and foremost, Dr. Gregory J.W. Urwin championed my project from initial concept through the final draft of the dissertation. He challenged me to better myself as a writer and researcher, and to whatever extent this dissertation is clear and engaging to read is due in large part to his persistent critiques and revisions. My committee members Drs. Andrew C. Isenberg and Jessica Roney took time away from their own busy schedules to give ample suggestions to improve my work. My outside reader, Dr. Mark Edward Lender, likewise proved generous with his time in reading several chapter drafts and offered his enthusiastic support. Completing this dissertation would have been impossible without the financial support of several institutions. The Temple University Graduate School awarded me with a four-year teaching fellowship that covered the costs of tuition and provided a stipend for living expenses. The David Library of the American Revolution awarded me a one-month fellowship that allowed me to conduct extensive and uninterrupted research in that institution‘s holdings. A one-week fellowship at the Society of the Cincinnati likewise permitted me to mine that organization‘s collection. The New Jersey Historical Commission and North Jersey Heritage Trail Association each provided awards that covered travel and research costs. Finally, a three-month residential fellowship at the Fred W. Smith National Library for the Study of George Washington afforded me time to write and explore archival holdings in the Washington, DC area. iv The support of friends, family, and colleagues made the entire process of writing this dissertation a pleasant one. The staff at Morristown National Historical Park made for wonderful companions during my summers working and researching at the park. Dr. Sarah Minegar and Dr. Jude Pfister in the curatorial department aided me with every research request. Park historian Eric Olsen deserves a very special thank you for the numerous insights and tips he generously provided from his own experiences studying Morristown‘s role in the revolution. Every conversation with him yielded new ideas that found their way into this dissertation. My partner, Rabeya Rahman, consistently offered to read drafts of various chapters and happily accompanied me on numerous research trips. Finally, my parents and brother supported my studies with hot meals, a roof over my head, and numerous fixes to computers and cars. I dedicate this dissertation to them. v To my parents vi TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………………….……iii ACKNOWLEDGENENTS……………………………………………………….…….iv DEDICATION…………………………………………………………………….……vi CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION…………..………………………………………...….….1 2. EARLY-MODERN STANDING ARMIES AND THE PROBLEM OF SHELTER……………………………………………………….………….…22 3. THE EARLY-WAR SHELTER PROBLEM: HOUSING THE CONTINENTAL ARMY, 1775-1776………………………………….……….74 4. CONTINENTAL SHELTER IN TRANSITION, 1777-1778…..………..…130 5. TOWARDS A NEW ART OF CASTRAMETATION: THE MIDDLEBROOKE WINTER OF 1778-1779……………………………….…192 6. MORRISTOWN 1779-1780: THE LOG-HUT CITY TESTED ….…….….253 7. CIVILIANS AND SOLDIERS IN NORTHERN NEW JERSEY……..…...312 8. THE SOCIAL WORLD OF WINTER QUARTERS…………………....….362 CONCLUSION……………………………………………………………..….416 BIBLIOGRAPHY……………………………….…………………………………......439 APPENDIX : IMAGES………………………………………………………......…….462 vii CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION Historians attribute the Patriot victory during the War of Independence to an attritional strategy which, especially after 1778, eschewed giving battle with the enemy except under favorable conditions. The Rebel commander-in-chief, General George Washington, maintained an aggressive outlook, but shortages in men, money, and supplies limited his opportunities for seeking battle. Raids, skirmishes, and prolonged periods of limited movement characterized the war in the Middle Colonies.1 The Continental Army that waged the war represented a complex organization that included thousands of soldiers and officers, women camp followers, and animals that needed immense quantities of food, clothing, and camp equipment. Historians have described the army as a mobile city due to its immense concentration of men and materiel.2 To pursue a positional strategy with a regular army, Continental commanders required bases where men could be sheltered, provisioned, and trained. Consequently, fortifications, magazines, and above all encampments underpinned the Continental Army‘s positional strategy, providing the infrastructure that facilitated a successful war effort. Mathew H. Spring, a leading historian of the British Army in the American Revolution, has succinctly summarized the importance encampments assumed in Continental strategy: ―Prudent rebel commanders shunned major confrontations on any but the most advantageous terms by ensconcing their armies in inaccessible and/or virtually impregnable fortified camps in the interior (like Washington at Valley Forge in Pennsylvania or Morristown in New Jersey).‖3 1 The renowned encampments at Valley Forge and Morristown effectively housed Patriot soldiers, equipment, and supplies. So too did lesser-known installations such as those at Redding, Connecticut, and Middlebrook, New Jersey. Beginning with Valley Forge in late 1777, General George Washington‘s army came to spend half the year in camp, typically retiring from the field in December and not returning to active operations until June. Timber-built cabins known as huts were the defining features of these Continental camps. Each housed about a dozen enlisted men or a smaller number officers, and offered superior protection from the elements compared to the tents used during mobile campaigns. At Valley Forge and Morristown, as well as Middlebrook, the Hudson Highlands in New York, and Redding, the Continental Army built thousands of log huts interspersed with alleys, streets, and parade grounds arrayed in dense complexes. The army effectively created urban, military environments from what had been field and forest. This dissertation studies these encampments, what it refers to ―log-hut cities.‖ These log-hut cities represented a distinct innovation in the art of war during the eighteenth century. European armies relied on different forms of shelter. Tents sufficed for active campaigns during warmer weather, but in wintertime commanders retired to billets in civilian homes or large, permanent barracks located in towns and fortresses. When European troops built timber shelters, they intended to use them only temporarily. Such structures garnered a reputation as ―shanties.‖ The Continental Army attempted to imitate its contemporaries during the war‘s first years. An absence of barracks, civilian opposition to billeting, and the fact that there were frequently not enough houses or public buildings available nearby forced George 2 Washington and his generals to seek alternatives. The densely-built arrangements of log huts first implemented at Valley Forge proved itself a serviceable option for housing a regular army. Historians and popular
Recommended publications
  • The Mutinies of 1781
    THE MUTINIES OF 1781 Two mutinies of Continental Line troops occurred in January 1781 as a consequence of a lack of food, spirits, clothing, and pay for at least a year. While these harsh conditions were not unique for that time, the first mutiny led to but only a second that was dramatically quelled in short order. Six reGiments of the Pennsylvania Line were winter-quartered south of Morristown, New Jersey, under the command of General Anthony Wayne. On New Year’s Day, January 1, 1781, soldiers from the regiments of the Line mutinied to seek redress for their sufferinG state. DurinG the initial uprisinG, two officers, a Lieutenant White and Captain Samuel Tolbert, were seriously wounded, with a third, Captain Alan BittinG/Bettin of the 4th Regiment, killed. After taking a cannon, the mutineers marched directly to Princeton to air their grievances. There, a board of sergeants was selected, headed by Sergeant William Bouzar, which then met with the President of the Supreme Executive Council of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Joseph Reed. Following the initial meeting, Reed met with delegates of the Continental Congress at Trenton. Reed seems to have found their demands compellinG. Subsequently, the troop marched to Trenton for a continuation of the neGotiations. There, a Commission was created to consider mainly their one complaint concerning bounties paid out to enlistees in 1776 and 1777. Following the Commission’s review, immediate discharges were Granted to those three-year men whose enlistments were over. Each was promised partial payment of back pay in addition to items of need.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of George Varnum, His Son Samuel Who Came to Ipswich About
    THE VARNUMS OF DRACUTT (IN MASSACHUSETTS) A HISTORY -OF- GEORGE VARNUM, HIS SON SAMUEL WHO CAME TO IPSWICH ABOUT 1635, AND GRANDSONS THOMAS, JOHN AND JOSEPH, WHO SETTLED IN DRACUTT, AND THEIR DESCENDANTS, <.tomptlet> from jfamill] ll)aper.s ant> @ffictal 'Necort>.s, -BY- JOHN MARSHALL VARNUM, OF BOSTON, 19 07. " trr:bosu mbo bo not tnasmn up tbe mimotl!: of tbdt S!nmitats bo not bumbt ta bi nmembtttb bl!: lf)osttrit11:." - EDMUND BURKE, CONTENTS. PAGE PREFACE 5 HISTORY OF THE FAMILY, BY SQUIRE PARKER VARNUM, 5 1818 9 GENEALOGY: GEORGE V ARNUM1 13 SAMUEL V ARNUM2 16 THOMAS V ARNUM3 AND HIS DESCENDANTS 23 JOHN V ARNUM3 AND HIS DESCENDANTS - 43 J°'OSEPH V ARNUM3 AND HIS DESCENDANTS - 115 SKETCH OF GEORGE V ARNAM1 13 WILL OF' GEORGE VARNAM - 14 INVENTORY OF ESTATE OF GEORGE V ARNAM - 15 SKETCH OF SAMUEL V ARNUM1 16 DEED OF SHATSWELL-VARNUM PuROHASE, 1664 17 TRANSFER OF LAND TO V ARNUMS, 1688-1735 21 SKETCH OF THOMAS VARNUM3 28 w ILL OF THOMAS VARNUM - 29 SKETCH OF SAMUEL V ARNUM4 30 INVENTORY OF ESTATE OF THOMAS V ARNUM4 31 SKETCHES OF THOMAS V ARNUM1 34 DEACON JEREMIAH V ARNUM8 35 MAJOR ATKINSON C. V ARNUM7 36 JOHN V ARNUM3 45 INVENTORY OF ESTATE OF JOHN VARNUM 41 iv VARNUM GENEALOGY. SKETCH OF LIEUT. JOHN V ARNUM4 51 JOURNAL OF LIEUT. JOHN VARNUM~ 54-64 vVILL 01' L1EuT. JoHN VARNU111• - 64-66 SKETCHES OF JONAS VARNUM4 67 ABRAHAM V ARNUl\14 68 JAMES VA RNUM4 70 SQUIRE p ARK.ER VARNUM. 74-78 COL, JAMES VARNUM" - 78-82 JONAS VARNUM6 83 CAPT.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2017 Newsletter
    Freedom’s Voice The Monthly Newsletter of the Military History Center 112 N. Main ST Broken Arrow, OK 74012 http://www.okmhc.org/ “Promoting Patriotism through the Preservation of Military History” Volume 4, Number 12 December 2017 Merry Christmas & Happy New Year USS Oklahoma Memorial Important Dates The USS Oklahoma Memorial on Ford Island in Pearl Harbor December 24 thru January 1 – Christmas/New Year Holidays was constructed in 2007. The memorial honors the 414 sailors and fifteen Marines who died on Oklahoma, on December 7, Military History Center Closed 1941, and the following few days. Less than a third of the men on board when Oklahoma was torpedoed escaped. By the time The MHC will reopen January 2. Oklahoma was raised in 1943, the men’s identification had be- come separated from their remains. The Defense POW/MIA Happy Hanukkah Accounting Agency is currently engaged in a project to identify the unknowns by DNA matches. Several have already been identified and their remains returned to their families. From the Editor Throughout the year, we have endeavored to bring readers timely news of MHC activities and events, as well as interesting stories. Each month we highlight a specific exhibit or artifact of the museum. The MHC displays artifacts from all America’s wars from the Revolutionary War to the present War on Terror. Many of the MHC’s artifacts and photographs are unique to the MHC and cannot be found in any other museum. Artifacts are only part of the story. Our mission is “Promot- ing Patriotism through the Preservation of Military History”.
    [Show full text]
  • Delaware in the American Revolution (2002)
    Delaware in the American Revolution An Exhibition from the Library and Museum Collections of The Society of the Cincinnati Delaware in the American Revolution An Exhibition from the Library and Museum Collections of The Society of the Cincinnati Anderson House Washington, D. C. October 12, 2002 - May 3, 2003 HIS catalogue has been produced in conjunction with the exhibition, Delaware in the American Revolution , on display from October 12, 2002, to May 3, 2003, at Anderson House, THeadquarters, Library and Museum of the Society of the Cincinnati, 2118 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Washington, D. C. 20008. It is the sixth in a series of exhibitions focusing on the contributions to the American Revolution made by the original 13 he season loudly calls for the greatest efforts of every states and the French alliance. Tfriend to his Country. Generous support for this exhibition was provided by the — George Washington, Wilmington, to Caesar Rodney, Delaware State Society of the Cincinnati. August 31, 1777, calling for the assistance of the Delaware militia in rebuffing the British advance to Philadelphia. Collections of the Historical Society of Delaware Also available: Massachusetts in the American Revolution: “Let It Begin Here” (1997) New York in the American Revolution (1998) New Jersey in the American Revolution (1999) Rhode Island in the American Revolution (2000) Connecticut in the American Revolution (2001) Text by Ellen McCallister Clark and Emily L. Schulz. Front cover: Domenick D’Andrea. “The Delaware Regiment at the Battle of Long Island, August 27, 1776.” [detail] Courtesy of the National Guard Bureau. See page 11. ©2002 by The Society of the Cincinnati.
    [Show full text]
  • David Library of the American Revolution Guide to Microform Holdings
    DAVID LIBRARY OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION GUIDE TO MICROFORM HOLDINGS Adams, Samuel (1722-1803). Papers, 1635-1826. 5 reels. Includes papers and correspondence of the Massachusetts patriot, organizer of resistance to British rule, signer of the Declaration of Independence, and Revolutionary statesman. Includes calendar on final reel. Originals are in the New York Public Library. [FILM 674] Adams, Dr. Samuel. Diaries, 1758-1819. 2 reels. Diaries, letters, and anatomy commonplace book of the Massachusetts physician who served in the Continental Artillery during the Revolution. Originals are in the New York Public Library. [FILM 380] Alexander, William (1726-1783). Selected papers, 1767-1782. 1 reel. William Alexander, also known as “Lord Sterling,” first served as colonel of the 1st NJ Regiment. In 1776 he was appointed brigadier general and took command of the defense of New York City as well as serving as an advisor to General Washington. He was promoted to major- general in 1777. Papers consist of correspondence, military orders and reports, and bulletins to the Continental Congress. Originals are in the New York Historical Society. [FILM 404] American Army (Continental, militia, volunteer). See: United States. National Archives. Compiled Service Records of Soldiers Who Served in the American Army During the Revolutionary War. United States. National Archives. General Index to the Compiled Military Service Records of Revolutionary War Soldiers. United States. National Archives. Records of the Adjutant General’s Office. United States. National Archives. Revolutionary War Pension and Bounty and Warrant Application Files. United States. National Archives. Revolutionary War Rolls. 1775-1783. American Periodicals Series I. 33 reels. Accompanied by a guide.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Story of the Faulkner Murals by Lester S. Gorelic, Ph.D. the Story Of
    The Story of the Faulkner Murals By Lester S. Gorelic, Ph.D. The story of the Faulkner murals in the Rotunda begins on October 23, 1933. On this date, the chief architect of the National Archives, John Russell Pope, recommended the approval of a two- year competing United States Government contract to hire a noted American muralist, Barry Faulkner, to paint a mural for the Exhibit Hall in the planned National Archives Building.1 The recommendation initiated a three-year project that produced two murals, now viewed and admired by more than a million people annually who make the pilgrimage to the National Archives in Washington, DC, to view two of the Charters of Freedom documents they commemorate: the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States of America. The two-year contract provided $36,000 in costs plus $6,000 for incidental expenses.* The contract ended one year before the projected date for completion of the Archives Building’s construction, providing Faulkner with an additional year to complete the project. The contract’s only guidance of an artistic nature specified that “The work shall be in character with and appropriate to the particular design of this building.” Pope served as the contract supervisor. Louis Simon, the supervising architect for the Treasury Department, was brought in as the government representative. All work on the murals needed approval by both architects. Also, The United States Commission of Fine Arts served in an advisory capacity to the project and provided input critical to the final composition. The contract team had expertise in art, architecture, painting, and sculpture.
    [Show full text]
  • Prayer Mapping
    SPIRITUAL PREPAREDNESS VOLUME 1 Prayer Mapping FOR Mighty Prayer HOW TO PRAY WITH STRENGTH AND GET ANSWERS TO YOUR PRAYERS “Ye shall call on the Father in my name, in MIGHTY PRAYER” BY DAVID JOHN POTTER © 2017 DLP ENTERPRISES, INC. – SECOND EDITION 2 SPIRITUAL PREPAREDNESS VOLUME 1 Prayer Mapping FOR Mighty Prayer Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................... 5 SECTION 1: Basics of Prayer ................................................................................................................................................ 9 What is Prayer? ..................................................................................................................... 9 What Are the Different Types of Prayer? ........................................................................... 12 Why is Prayer Necessary? ................................................................................................... 14 How and When Should I Pray? ............................................................................................ 17 Where Should I Pray? .......................................................................................................... 21 What Is the Language of Prayer? ........................................................................................ 22 What Are The Different Sources of Inspiration? ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Here, a Single Source Is the Only Witness
    The Spy Who Never Was The Strange Case of John Honeyman and Revolutionary War Espionage Alexander Rose sion so gravely threaten the John Honeyman is famed as Revolution’s survival. the secret agent who saved George Washington and the The problem is, John Honey- Continental Army during the man was no spy—or at least, dismal winter of 1776/77. At a not one of Washington’s. In this time when Washington had suf- essay I will establish that the fered an agonizing succession of key parts of the story were defeats at the hands of the Brit- The problem is, John invented or plagiarized long “ ish, it was Honeyman who after the Revolution and, Honeyman was no brought the beleaguered com- through repetition, have spy.…Key parts of his mander precise details of the become accepted truth. I exam- story were invented…and Hessian enemy’s dispositions at ine our knowledge of the tale, through repetition have Trenton, New Jersey. assess the veracity of its compo- become accepted truth. nents, and trace its DNA to the Soon afterwards, acting his single story—a piece of family part as double agent, Honey- history published nearly 100 man informed the gullible Col. years after the battle. 1 These Johann Rall, the Hessian com- historical explorations addition- ” ally will remind modern intelli- mander, that the colonials were in no shape to attack. Washing- gence officers and analysts that ton’s men, he said, were suffer- the undeclared motives of ing dreadfully from the cold and human sources may be as many were unshod.
    [Show full text]
  • Genealogical Sketch of the Descendants of Samuel Spencer Of
    C)\\vA CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 924 096 785 351 Cornell University Library The original of this bool< is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924096785351 In compliance with current copyright law, Cornell University Library produced this replacement volume on paper that meets the ANSI Standard Z39.48-1992 to replace the irreparably deteriorated original. 2003 CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY : GENEALOGICAL SKETCH OF THE DESCENDANTS OF Samuel Spencer OF PENNSYLVANIA BY HOWARD M. JENKINS AUTHOR OF " HISTORICAL COLLECTIONS RELATING TO GWYNEDD," VOLUME ONE, "MEMORIAL HISTORY OF PHILADELPHIA," ETC., ETC. |)l)Uabei|it)ia FERRIS & LEACH 29 North Seventh Street 1904 . CONTENTS. Page I. Samuel Spencer, Immigrant, I 11. John Spencer, of Bucks County, II III. Samuel Spencer's Wife : The Whittons, H IV. Samuel Spencer, 2nd, 22 V. William. Spencer, of Bucks, 36 VI. The Spencer Genealogy 1 First and Second Generations, 2. Third Generation, J. Fourth Generation, 79 ^. Fifth Generation, 114. J. Sixth Generation, 175 6. Seventh Generation, . 225 VII. Supplementary .... 233 ' ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS. Page 32, third line, "adjourned" should be, of course, "adjoined." Page 33, footnote, the date 1877 should read 1787. " " Page 37, twelfth line from bottom, Three Tons should be "Three Tuns. ' Page 61, Hannah (Shoemaker) Shoemaker, Owen's second wife, must have been a grand-niece, not cousin, of Gaynor and Eliza. Thus : Joseph Lukens and Elizabeth Spencer. Hannah, m. Shoemaker. Gaynor Eliza Other children. I Charles Shoemaker Hannah, m. Owen S. Page 62, the name Horsham is divided at end of line as if pronounced Hor-sham ; the pronunciation is Hors-ham.
    [Show full text]
  • FORD MANSION Day
    THE UPSTAIRS HALL As you enter the hall, notice the three Pennsylvania low-back Windsor chairs, circa 1750. These In this large hallway most of the winter's social activities are the earliest known American- took place. According to family tradition, the large camp chest style Windsor. to your left was left by Washington as a gift to Mrs. Ford. The folding cot would have been used by "Will," Washington's favorite servant, who as a matter of custom, slept close to the WASHINGTON'S CONFERENCE AND DINING ROOM General's bedroom. In this room the daily activities of Washington's staff were . Proceed to the next room on performed. Washington also used this room to meet with your left. officers and citizens. At 3 p.m. daily, Washington, Mrs. Washington, his staff, and guests began the main meal of the FORD MANSION day. At least three courses were served, and the meal took in THE AIDES' AND GUESTS' ROOM excess of two hours to consume. But much of that time was used to informally discuss military topics, such as supply, Most of Washington's aides slept in this room as evidenced by recruitment, and strategy for the spring campaign. the number of folding cots and traveling chests. However, when important guests came to the House, the aides moved Of special interest is the Chippendale desk thought to have into other quarters. In May of 1780, LaFayette stayed here as been here during the winter of 1779-80. Also observe the had the Spanish Ambassador Don Juan De Miralles. Chippendale mirror, a Ford family piece, with a Phoenix bird Unfortunately, De Miralles died while here as a guest of the arising from the top.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Landscapes Inventory, Jockey Hollow, Morristown National
    National Park Service Cultural Landscapes Inventory 1999 Jockey Hollow Morristown National Historical Park Table of Contents Inventory Unit Summary & Site Plan Concurrence Status Geographic Information and Location Map Management Information National Register Information Chronology & Physical History Analysis & Evaluation of Integrity Condition Treatment Bibliography & Supplemental Information Jockey Hollow Morristown National Historical Park Inventory Unit Summary & Site Plan Inventory Summary The Cultural Landscapes Inventory Overview: CLI General Information: Purpose and Goals of the CLI The Cultural Landscapes Inventory (CLI), a comprehensive inventory of all cultural landscapes in the national park system, is one of the most ambitious initiatives of the National Park Service (NPS) Park Cultural Landscapes Program. The CLI is an evaluated inventory of all landscapes having historical significance that are listed on or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, or are otherwise managed as cultural resources through a public planning process and in which the NPS has or plans to acquire any legal interest. The CLI identifies and documents each landscape’s location, size, physical development, condition, landscape characteristics, character-defining features, as well as other valuable information useful to park management. Cultural landscapes become approved CLIs when concurrence with the findings is obtained from the park superintendent and all required data fields are entered into a national database. In addition,
    [Show full text]
  • NJS: an Interdisciplinary Journal Winter 2017 107
    NJS: An Interdisciplinary Journal Winter 2017 107 Hills, Huts, and Horse-Teams: The New Jersey Environment and Continental Army Winter Encampments, 1778-1780 By Steven Elliott DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14713/njs.v3i1.67 New Jersey’s role as a base for the Continental Army during the War of Independence has played an important part in the state’s understanding of its role in the American Revolution, and continues to shape the state’s image as the “Cockpit of the Revolution,” and “Crossroads of the American Revolution” today. This article uncovers how and why the Continental Army decided to place the bulk of its forces in northern New Jersey for two consecutive winters during the war. Unlike the more renowned Valley Forge winter quarters, neither New Jersey encampment has received significant scholarly attention, and most works that have covered the topic have presumed the state’s terrain offered obvious strategic advantages for an army on the defensive. This article offers a new interpretation, emphasizing the army’s logistical needs including forage for its animals and timber supplies for constructing winter shelters. The availability of these resources, rather than easily defended rough terrain or close-proximity to friendly civilians, led Washington and his staff to make northern New Jersey its mountain home for much of the war. By highlighting to role of the environment in shaping military strategy, this article adds to our understanding of New Jersey’s crucial role in the American struggle for independence. Introduction In early December, 1778, patriot soldiers from Delaware, Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Virginia arrived at the southern foothills of New Jersey’s Watchung Mountains and began erecting a log-hut winter encampment near Middlebrook.
    [Show full text]