DOCSLIB.ORG

Santa Barbara County Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Update 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Santa Barbara County Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Update 2019 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY INTEGRATED REGIONAL WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN UPDATE 2019 Prepared for : SANTA BARBARA COUNTY IRWM COOPERATING PARTNERS INTEGRATED REGIONAL WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN UPDATE 2019 Prepared by: 621 Chapala Street Santa Barbara, California 93101 Printed on 30% post-consumer recycled material. Santa Barbara County IRWM Region IRWM Plan Update 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No. ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................... XI ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ....................................................................................................... XIII 1 INTRODUCTION TO IRWM PLAN UPDATE 2019 ...................................................1 1.1 Integrated Regional Water Management ................................................................ 6 2 REGIONAL DESCRIPTION ...........................................................................................9 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 9 2.2 Regional Overview ................................................................................................. 9 2.2.1 Regional Acceptance Process ..................................................................... 9 2.2.2 Internal Boundaries ..................................................................................... 9 2.2.3 Integrated Regional Water Resource Management in the Region ............ 17 2.3 Physical Setting ..................................................................................................... 21 2.3.1 Location .................................................................................................... 21 2.3.2 Climate ...................................................................................................... 21 2.3.3 Population ................................................................................................. 22 2.4 Land Use, Major Watersheds, and Water Systems ............................................... 25 2.4.1 Land Use ................................................................................................... 25 2.4.2 Watersheds ................................................................................................ 31 2.4.3 Groundwater Basins .................................................................................. 47 2.4.4 Major Infrastructure .................................................................................. 50 2.5 Ecological Processes ............................................................................................. 77 2.5.1 Aquatic Sensitive Species ......................................................................... 77 2.5.2 Freshwater Habitats .................................................................................. 78 2.5.3 Sloughs/Coastal Salt Marshes ................................................................... 81 2.5.4 Coastal Dunes ........................................................................................... 83 2.5.5 Areas of Special Biological Significance ................................................. 84 2.5.6 Marine Protected Areas............................................................................. 84 2.6 Regional Water Management History .................................................................. 89 2.6.1 Water Supply Development – South Coast, Santa Ynez Valley, and Lompoc Valley.......................................................................................... 89 2.6.2 Water Supply Development – Santa Maria Valley ................................... 95 2.6.3 State Water Project ................................................................................... 97 2.6.4 Wastewater Management .......................................................................... 98 11089 i January 2019 Santa Barbara County IRWM Region IRWM Plan Update 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) Section Page No. 2.7 Water Supplies and Demand ............................................................................... 102 2.7.1 Water Supply .......................................................................................... 102 2.7.2 Water Demand ........................................................................................ 112 2.8 Projected Water Supply and Demand ................................................................. 114 2.8.1 Projected Municipal Water Supply ......................................................... 115 2.8.2 Projected Agricultural Supply................................................................. 115 2.8.3 Projected Municipal Water Demand ....................................................... 116 2.8.4 Municipal Conservation Estimates ......................................................... 116 2.8.5 Projected Industrial Water Demand ........................................................ 117 2.8.6 Projected Agricultural Water Demand.................................................... 117 2.8.7 Projected Future Water Demand and Supply Balance ............................ 118 2.8.8 Effects of Climate Change on Supply ..................................................... 119 2.8.9 Uncertainty .............................................................................................. 120 2.9 Reducing Dependence on the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta ........................... 121 2.10 Water Quality ...................................................................................................... 123 2.10.1 Groundwater Quality .............................................................................. 128 2.10.2 Surface Water Quality............................................................................. 144 2.10.3 Ocean Water Quality............................................................................... 150 2.11 Social and Cultural Makeup of Santa Barbara County ....................................... 150 2.11.1 Economic Conditions and Trends in the Region .................................... 150 2.11.2 Social and Cultural Makeup .................................................................... 151 2.12 Natural Hazards Requiring Emergency Planning ............................................... 162 2.12.1 Severe Storms and Flooding ................................................................... 162 2.12.2 Earthquake .............................................................................................. 164 2.12.3 Fire .......................................................................................................... 164 2.12.4 Drought ................................................................................................... 165 2.13 Climate Change ................................................................................................... 168 2.13.1 Regional Impacts .................................................................................... 168 2.13.2 Identification of Vulnerabilities .............................................................. 174 2.13.3 Prioritized Vulnerabilities ....................................................................... 179 2.13.4 Methodology for Further Data Gathering and Analysis of Prioritized Vulnerabilities ....................................................................... 187 3 GOVERNANCE AND PARTICIPATION..................................................................189 3.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 189 11089 ii January 2019 Santa Barbara County IRWM Region IRWM Plan Update 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) Section Page No. 3.2 Governance Structure.......................................................................................... 189 3.2.1 Cooperating Partners ............................................................................... 192 3.2.2 Decision Making ..................................................................................... 194 3.3 Balanced Access and Opportunity for Participation in the IRWM Process ....... 196 3.3.1 Stakeholder Outreach and Inter-Regional Coordination......................... 197 3.3.2 Disadvantaged Community Outreach and Involvement ......................... 198 3.3.3 Tribal Communities ................................................................................ 203 3.4 Long-Term Implementation of the IRWM Plan ................................................. 203 3.5 Coordination with Neighboring IRWM Efforts and State and Federal Agencies ................................................................................................. 204 3.6 Neighboring IRWM Efforts ................................................................................ 205 3.7 Effective Communication, both Internal and External, throughout the IRWM Region ..................................................................................................... 206 4 OBJECTIVES, PRIORITIES, AND TARGETS ........................................................209 4.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 209 4.2 Objectives ........................................................................................................... 209 4.2.1 Groups and Stakeholders Involved in the Process .................................. 209 4.2.2 Process for Developing the Objectives ..................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Breeding Birds of Four Isolated Mountains in Southern California
    WESTERN BIRDS Volume 24, Number 4, 1993 BREEDING BIRDS OF FOUR ISOLATED MOUNTAINS IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA JOAN EASTON LENTZ, 433 PimientoLn., Santa Barbara,California 93108 The breedingavifaunas of FigueroaMountain and Big PineMountain in SantaBarbara County and Pine Mountain and Mount Pinos in Venturaand Kern countiesare of great ornithologicalinterest. These four mountains supportislands of coniferousforest separated by otherhabitats at lower elevations. Little information on the birds of the first three has been publishedpreviously. From 1981 to 1993, I, withthe helpof a numberof observers,censused the summer residentbirds of these four mountains,paying particular attentionto the speciesrestricted to highelevations. By comparingthese avifaunaswith each other, as well as with those of the San Gabriel,San Bernardino,and San Jacinto mountains, and the southernSierra Nevada, I hopeto addto currentknowledge of thestatus and distribution of montane birds in southern California. VEGETATIO51AND GEOGRAPHY The patternof vegetationin the surveyareas is typicalof thatfound on manysouthern California mountains. Generally, the south- and west-facing slopesof the mountainsare coveredwith chaparralor pinyon-juniper woodlandalmost to the summits.On the north-facingslopes, however, coolertemperatures and more mesic conditions support coniferous forest, which often reaches far down the mountainsides. Because the climate is arid, few creeksor streamsflow at high elevations,and most water is availablein the form of seepsor smallsprings. BothFigueroa (4528 feet, 1380 m) andBig Pine (6828 feet,2081 m) mountainsare locatedin the San RafaelRange, the southernmostof the CoastRanges (Figure 1, Norrisand Webb 1990). The San RafaelMoun- tainsare borderedby the SierraMadre, a low chaparral-coveredrange, to the northand the CuyamaValley to the northeast.The SisquocRiver drains west from the San Rafael Mountains and Sierra Madre to the Santa Maria River.To the southlies the foothillgrassland of the SantaYnez Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Ynez Annual Report
    FORTY-SECOND ANNUAL ENGINEERING AND SURVEY REPORT ON WATER SUPPLY CONDITIONS OF THE SANTA YNEZ RIVER WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 2019-2020 April 24, 2020 Northern California Southern California Arizona Colorado Oregon FORTY-SECOND ANNUAL ENGINEERING AND SURVEY REPORT ON WATER SUPPLY CONDITIONS OF THE SANTA YNEZ RIVER WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 2019-2020 April 24, 2020 CARLSBAD, COVINA, AND SAN RAFAEL, CALIFORNIA APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA CENTENNIAL, COLORADO MEDFORD, OREGON 1126-13 April 24, 2020 San Rafael Board of Directors Santa Ynez River Water Conservation District P.O. Box 719 Santa Ynez, California 93460 Re: Forty-Second Annual Engineering Survey and Report on Water Supply Conditions of the Santa Ynez River Water Conservation District, 2019-2020 Dear Board Members: Transmitted herewith is our Engineering Survey and Report on Water Supply Conditions of the Santa Ynez River Water Conservation District for 2019-2020. This, the Forty-Second Annual Report, presents the required and pertinent information for the Board of Directors to make necessary determinations for levying groundwater charges upon the production of groundwater from water-producing facilities (water wells) within the District. As such, it provides information on the status of the groundwater and surface water supplies, as well as the annual production of groundwater from within the District. Sincerely, Oliver S. Page OSP:rrk Enclosures TABLES OF CONTENTS Page Number 1.0 Introduction 1 1.1. Historical Background 1 1.2. Description of the District 2 1.3. Report Summary 3 1.4. Findings and Determinations 7 1.5. Sources of Information 8 2.0 Groundwater Charges 9 2.1. Revenues 10 2.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 74, No. 194/Thursday October 8, 2009
    51772 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 194 / Thursday October 8, 2009 / Rules and Regulations upgraded after the effective date of the 200E, Washington, DC 20220; phone • Historical or current evidence that regulations in this part. 202–927–8210. supports setting the boundary of the (f) Nothing in this part shall be SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: proposed viticultural area as the construed as requiring the use of any petition specifies; particular type of electronic toll Background on Viticultural Areas • Evidence relating to the geographical features, such as climate, collection technology. However, any TTB Authority such toll collection technology must soils, elevation, and physical features, meet the interoperability requirement of Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol that distinguish the proposed this section. Administration Act (FAA Act), 27 viticultural area from surrounding areas; U.S.C. 205(e), authorizes the Secretary • A description of the specific § 950.9 Enforcement. of the Treasury to prescribe regulations boundary of the proposed viticultural (a) The tolling authority of any facility for the labeling of wine, distilled spirits, area, based on features, found on United operating pursuant to authority under a and malt beverages. The FAA Act States Geological Survey (USGS) maps; 1604 toll program shall be suspended in requires that these regulations, among and the event the relevant toll agency is not other things, prohibit consumer • A copy of the appropriate USGS in compliance with this part within six deception and the use of misleading map(s) with the proposed viticultural (6) months of receiving a written notice statements on labels, and ensure that area’s boundary prominently marked.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Barbara County Communities Wildfire Protection Plan
    Santa Barbara County Communities Wildfire Protection Plan Sycamore Canyon Fire - 1977 Santa Barbara County Communities ● Wildfire Protection Plan Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 Plan Status and Direction 1 Wildfire Situation 2 Activity Status 2 THE PLANNING PROCESS 4 Background 4 Purpose 4 Goals and Objectives 4 The Consolidated Planning Process 5 Administrative Oversight and Approval 5 Stakeholder Collaboration and Concurrence 6 Santa Barbara County FireSafe Council 6 Plan Implementation 7 Plan Monitoring, Evaluation and Updating 7 COMMUNITY DESCRIPTION 8 Governance 8 Government Services 10 Population 10 Demographics 10 Employment 11 Socioeconomic Trends 11 Geography 11 Climate 12 Ecosystems 14 WILDFIRE PROTECTION ADMINISTRATION 15 The Fire Protection System 15 Cooperative Fire Services 21 Fire Suppression Policies and Philosophy 21 Programs, Projects and Activities 23 Funding and Fiscal Framework 24 Institutional Issues 24 WILDFIRE HAZARD 27 Components of the Wildfire Environment 27 Wildfire Regime and Condition Class 28 Wildfire History 29 The Current Wildfire Problem 29 Structural Ignitibility 30 WILDFIRE RISK ASSESSMENT 31 Hazardous Fuels 31 Historic Severe Fire Weather 34 Ignition Workload 35 Assets at Risk 38 4410 Cathedral Oaks Road ● Santa Barbara, CA 93110 ● (805) 681-5500 ii Santa Barbara County Communities ● Wildfire Protection Plan AT-RISK COMMUNITIES AND TARGET PLANNING BLOCKS 42 Cachuma Lake 42 Cebada Canyon 42 El Capitan 42 El Sueno 43 Figueroa 43 Gobernador Canyon 43 Goleta 43 Hollister Ranch 43 Hope Ranch 43 Jonata 43 Miguelito Canyon 43 Mission Canyon 43 Mission Hills 44 Montecito 44 Orcutt 44 Refugio Canyon 44 San Roque 44 Santa Monica Canyon 44 Tepusquet Canyon 44 Toro Canyon 44 Vandenberg Village 44 GLOSSARY 45 4410 Cathedral Oaks Road ● Santa Barbara, CA 93110 ● (805) 681-5500 iii Santa Barbara County Communities ● Wildfire Protection Plan Santa Barbara County Communities Wildfire Protection Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Prescribed burn, target planning block, completed burn, wildfire, and Copter 308 with helitorch attached.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground-Water Quality in the Santa Rita, Buellton, and Los Olivos Hydrologic Subareas of the Santa
    GROUND-WATER QUALITY IN THE SANTA RITA, BUELLTON, AND LOS OLIVOS HYDROLOGIC SUBAREAS OF THE SANTA YNEZ RIVER BASIN, SANTA BARBARA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By Scott N. Hamlin U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 84-4131 Prepared in cooperation with the CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD, CENTRAL COAST REGION o C\J I C\J Sacramento, California 1985 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL HODEL, SECRETARY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information Copies of this report write to: can be purchased from: Open-File Services Section District Chief Western Distribution Branch U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Federal Building, Room W-2234 Box 25425, Federal Center 2800 Cottage Way Denver, CO 80225 Sacramento, CA 95825 Telephone: (303) 236-7476 CONTENTS Page Abstract ------------------------------------------------------------- i Introduction -------------- - ______________ ______________________ 2 Location and general features -------------------- --- ----- - 2 Problem - - - - - -- 2 Purpose and scope ----------------------------------------------- 4 Approach -------------------------------------------------------- 4 Previous work ------------- _-_-_-----_ ____ _________________ 5 Acknowledgments ------------------------------------------------- 5 Well-numbering system ------------------------ --- ______--_--_ 5 Ground-water geology ------------------------------------------------- 7 Main water-bearing units -------- __________ _____ _______ __ 7 Geologic structure
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Introduction
    924 Anacapa Street, Suite 4A Santa Barbara, CA 93101 PH 805.897.3800 www.geosyntec.com TO: Stetson Engineers SUBJECT: DRAFT Technical Memorandum Regional Geology and 3D Geologic Model for the Santa Ynez River Valley Groundwater Basin PREPARED BY: Eryn Torres, Senior Professional Maygan Cline, Senior Geologist Mark Grivetti, Senior Principal Hydrogeologist DATE: May 12, 2020 1. INTRODUCTION This technical memorandum is prepared as part of the hydrogeologic conceptual model (HCM) for the Western and Central Management Areas (WMA and CMA, respectively) Groundwater Sustainability Agencies1 (GSAs) within the larger Santa Ynez River Valley Groundwater Basin (SYRVGB). This technical memorandum focuses on the geologic units within the SYRVGB, and the subsurface geologic model built to visualize those units. The aquifer characteristics of these units are then considered in a separate study which correlates principal aquifers within the basin. This technical memo describes the modeled geologic units and existing literature that identifies the water-bearing tendency of each unit but does not include an in-depth principal aquifer analysis or discussion. The HCM is the conceptual understanding of the physical characteristics related to the regional hydrology, land use, geologic units and structures, groundwater quality, principal groundwater aquifers, and principle aquitards of the WMA and CMA portions of the SYRVGB (basin). Understanding the regional geologic setting and structural configuration is integral to conducting subsequent technical studies of the basin, including presence, absence and correlation of principal aquifers, identification of an appropriate monitoring network, numerical groundwater modeling, and identification of projects and management actions in accordance with the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA). A detailed subsurface three-dimensional model of the geologic units and structures (model) that comprise the basin was developed from publicly available published reports and data sources from the WMA and CMA GSAs.
    [Show full text]
  • 53048 Federal Register / Vol. 47, No. 227 1 Wednesday, November 24, 1982 / Proposed Rules
    53048 Federal Register / Vol. 47, No. 227 1 Wednesday, November 24, 1982 / Proposed Rules prescribed by the Secretary, the terms the Department reviews the executed DATE: Written comments must be and conditions upon which the mortgage loan documents in accordance with the received by January 10, 1983. will be insured. procedure set forth in § 200.163, if the ADDRESS: Send written comments to: (b) Except as set forth in § 200.164(f), documents are acceptable the loan is Chief, Regulations and Procedures commitments are not issued by HUD endorsed. Division, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco under the single family Program of and Firearms, P.O. Box 385, Washington, PART 237-AMENDED] Direct Endorsement. Under this Program DC 20044-0385, Attention: Notice No. the Department reviews the executed 14. Part 237 is amended by revising 435. loan documents in accordance with the § 237.5 to read as follows: procedure set forth in § 200.163, and if Copies of the petition, the proposed the documents are acceptable the loan is § 237.5 Cross-reference. regulations, the appropriate maps, and written comments will be available for endorsed.. 11. Part To be eligible for insurance under this 203 would be amended by public inspection during normal subpart, a mortgage shall meet all of the business hours at: ATF Reading Room, revising § 203.255 to redd as follows: eligibility requirements for insurance Room 4405, Federal Building, 12th and § 203.255 Insurance of mortgage. under § § 203.1 et seq. (Part 203, Subpart Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, A) of this chapter; § § 220.1 et seq. (Part (a) Upon compliance with a D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora and Ecology of the Santa Monica Mountains Edited by D.A
    Flora and Ecology of the Santa Monica Mountains Edited by D.A. Knapp. 2007. Southern California Botanists, Fullerton, CA. 159 FREEZING TOLERANCE IMPACTS CHAPARRAL SPECIES DISTRIBUTION IN THE SANTA MONICA MOUNTAINS Stephen D. Davis1, R. Brandon Pratt2, Frank W. Ewers3, and Anna L. Jacobsen4 1Natural Science Division Pepperdine University, Malibu, CA 90263 [email protected]. 2Department of Biology California State University, Bakersfield Bakersfield, CA 93311 [email protected] 3Biological Sciences Department California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Pomona, CA 91768 [email protected] 4Michigan State University Department of Plant Biology East Lansing, MI 48824 [email protected] ABSTRACT: A shift in chaparral species composition occurs from coastal to inland sites of the Santa Monica Mountains of southern California. Past studies have attributed this pattern to differential adaptations of chaparral species to gradients in moisture and solar radiation. We examined an alternate hypothesis, that shifts in species composition from coastal to inland sites is a result of differential response to freezing and the interactions of freezing with drought. Coastal sites rarely experience air temperatures below 0 °C whereas just 5 to 6 km inland, cold valleys experience temperatures as low as -12 °C. Seasonal drought can last 6 to 8 months and may extend, on rare occasions, into the month of December, coincidental with the onset of winter freeze. Either water stress or freezing, by independent mechanisms, can induce embolism in stem xylem and block water transport from soil to leaves, leading to branchlet dieback or whole shoot death. Water stress in combination with freezing may enhance xylem embolism formation. Post- fire seedlings are especially vulnerable because of greater tissue sensitivity to freezing injury, diminutive roots that preclude access to deep soil moisture or resprout success, and greater exposure to nighttime radiation freezes after canopy removal by fire.
    [Show full text]
  • Nitrogen Cycling and Export in California Chaparral: the Role of Climate in Shaping Ecosystem Responses to Fire
    Ecological Monographs, 87(1), 2017, pp. 76–90 © 2016 by the Ecological Society of America Nitrogen cycling and export in California chaparral: the role of climate in shaping ecosystem responses to fire ERIN J. HANAN,1,2,4 CHRISTINA (NAOMI) TAGUE,3 AND JOSHUA P. SCHIMEL1 1Department of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106 USA 2Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164 USA 3Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106 USA Abstract. Climate change models predict that interannual rainfall variability will increase in California over the next several decades; these changes will likely influence how frequently California ecosystems burn and how they respond to fire. Fires uncouple N mobilization from uptake by destroying plant biomass and increasing nitrification. Following fire, autumn and winter rains can leach N into streams from slopes that have been denuded. The amount of N − exported depends on how rapidly soil microbes metabolize it into mobile forms such as NO3 , and the rate that recovering plants take up available N. However, the long-term effects of a changing climate on postfire N dynamics remain unknown. We used the ecohydrologic model RHESSys (regional hydro- ecologic simulation system) to evaluate how interannual climate variability may affect the magnitude of N mineralization, nitrification, N export, and plant recovery following fire. N export was highest when fire was followed by drought; even though there was less water moving through the system, dry conditions prolonged the period during which N mobilization was decoupled from plant uptake.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora and Fauna Values
    includes many endemic species – those species found nowhere else in the world except for within one specific region. Roughly 30 endemic animal As part of one of the top 35 global biodiversity hotspots, species and 35 endemic plant species are found in the Santa Barbara Santa Barbara County is home to a remarkable array of region.6 Many have evolved in this area of California because of geograph- species, habitats and transition zones which stem from the ic isolation, rare soil substrates, and limited mobility. Examples of endemic regions unique mix of topography and climate.1 The species in the County include the Lompoc kangaroo rat, kinsel oak, and the FLORA AND County is unique within the California Floristic Province Santa Barbara jewel flower. Many other species are endemic to our region (the biodiversity hotspot the County is in) as it has fewer of California but are found outside the County including the Mount Pinos FAUNA developed or altered natural landscapes than other parts chipmunk, black bellied slender salamander and Cristina’s timema. of the hotspot; this adds to the value for conservation within Santa Barbara County. Vegetation provides habitat and home for the many unique and common animal species in the County, and varies greatly from north to Vegetation communities and species from California’s south, east to west, and often from valley to valley. Of the 31 vegetation Central Coast and South Coast, the Sierra Nevada, and the macrogroups found in California, 19 are found within Santa Barbara San Joaquin Valley can all be found locally due to conver- County.9 Chaparral is the most common vegetation type in the County gence of four ecoregions within the County: Southern and covers much of the upland watersheds where it also serves as a California Coast, Southern California Mountains and Central Coast riverine, riparian ecosystems, and wetlands provide some of natural buffer against erosion.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Wildland Fires on Vandenberg Air Force Base, California
    (I NASA Technical Memorandum 100983 History Of Wildland Fires On Vandenberg Air Force Base, California Unclar GJ/57 G748775 March 1988 National Aeronautics and Space Administration I NASA Technical Memorandum 100983 History Of Wildland Fires On Vandenberg Air Force Base, California Diana E. Hickson The Bionetics Corporation, Kennedy Space Center, Florida March 1988 National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA John F. Kennedy Space Center TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS................................................................................................... i ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................... ..ii ... LIST OF TABLES............................................................................................................. 111 ... LIST OF FIGURES........................................................................................................... HI ACKNOWLEGMENTS.................................................................................................... iv PRODUCT DISCLAIMER................................................................................................ v INTRODUCTION................................................................ i ............................................. .l METHODS........................................................................................................................ .4 RESULTS.. ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Influencing Ecosystem Integrity
    Chapter 3 Chapter 3 – Factors Influencing Ecosystem Integrity Ecosystems are not defined so much by the objects they contain as by the processes that regulate them. — Christensen et al. 1989 Key Questions to change is not limitless and some organisms • What are the primary natural processes and human activities that are clearly more adaptable than others. In gen- drive change in the composition, eral, the complete assemblage of native plants structure, and extent of southern and animals is most likely to be maintained California mountain and foothill when environmental conditions remain within ecosystems? their natural historic range. Thus we need to develop an understanding of what the historic • How are those processes and or natural ranges of variability are for various activities currently affecting the ecological processes. These serve as the refer- landscape and what can be ence conditions to which present day determined regarding the natural range of variability? conditions can be compared. The closer cur- rent conditions are to reference conditions, the • What current trends are apparent and greater our confidence that all the ecological what threats or opportunities are components will continue to persist (for de- presented by them? tailed description of the “reference variability” This chapter considers the primary pro- concept see Manley et al. 1995). This is the cesses and activities that modify ecological basis for the “coarse-filter” approach to con- communities in the mountains and foothills. servation described in chapter 2. These include (1) natural disturbance pro- In our analysis, we first asked the assess- cesses such as fire, flood, drought, and ment task group to identify and describe the outbreaks of insects or disease; (2) human uses key interactions between landscape elements of the land for development, resources, and and the change agents (e.g., ecological pro- recreation; and (3) the spread (often uninten- cesses or human activities) currently shaping tionally) of new elements such as air pollution them.
    [Show full text]