Parathion-Methyl Final Review Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Parathion-Methyl Final Review Report PARATHION-METHYL FINAL REVIEW REPORT The reconsideration of the active constituent parathion-methyl, registration of products containing parathion-methyl and approvals of their associated labels NOVEMBER 2011 © Commonwealth of Australia 2011 This work is copyright. Apart from use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA). Requests and enquiries regarding reproduction and rights should be addressed to the APVMA’s Chemical Review Program Manager. ISBN 978-0-9871919-1-5 This document is published by the APVMA. In referencing this document the APVMA should be cited as both author and publisher. Comments and enquiries may be directed to: Manager Chemical Review Australian Pesticides & Veterinary Medicines Authority PO Box 6182 KINGSTON ACT 2604 Australia Telephone: +61 2 6210 4749 Facsimile: +61 2 6210 4776 Email: [email protected] Web site: http://www.apvma.gov.au i FOREWORD The Australian Pesticides & Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) is an independent statutory authority with responsibility for the regulation of agricultural and veterinary chemicals in Australia. Its statutory powers are provided in the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals (Administration) Act 1992 (Administration Act) and the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Code Act 1994 (Agvet Codes). The APVMA can reconsider the approval of an active constituent, the registration of a chemical product or the approval of a label for a container for a chemical product at any time. This is outlined in Part 2, Division 4 of the Agvet Codes. A reconsideration may be initiated when new research or evidence has raised concerns about the use or safety of a particular chemical, a product containing that chemical, or its label. The reconsideration process includes a call for information from a variety of sources, a review of that information and, following public consultation, a decision about the future use of the chemical or product. The information and technical data required by the APVMA to review the safety of both new and existing chemical products must be derived according to accepted scientific principles, as must the methods of assessment undertaken. In undertaking reconsiderations (hereafter referred to as reviews), the APVMA works in close cooperation with advisory agencies including the Office of Chemical Safety within the Department of Health and Ageing, the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (DSEWPaC), and state and territory departments of agriculture, as well as other expert advisers as appropriate. The APVMA has a policy of encouraging openness and transparency in its activities and community involvement in decision-making. The publication of review reports is a part of that process. The APVMA also makes these reports available to the regulatory agencies of other countries as part of bilateral agreements. The APVMA recommends that countries receiving these reports will not utilise them for registration purposes unless they are also provided with the raw data from the relevant applicant. The basis for the current reconsideration is whether the APVMA is satisfied that continued use of the active constituent parathion-methyl and products containing parathion-methyl in accordance with the instructions for their use: would not be an undue hazard to the safety of people exposed to it during its handling would not be likely to have an effect that is harmful to human beings ii would not be likely to have an unintended effect that is harmful to animals, plants or things or to the environment would not unduly prejudice trade or commerce between Australia and places outside Australia. The APVMA also considered whether product labels carry adequate instructions and warning statements. This document is ‘The reconsideration of approvals of the active parathion-methyl, registrations of products containing parathion-methyl and their associated labels, final review report’. It relates to all products containing parathion-methyl that were nominated for review by the APVMA as well as those registered after the commencement of the review, whose registration is subject to the outcomes of the review. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY VII Review findings viii Review status x 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Regulatory status of parathion-methyl in Australia 1 1.2 Reasons for parathion-methyl review 2 1.3 Scope of the review 2 1.4 Regulatory options 3 1.5 Interim use regime 4 2. APPROVED PARATHION-METHYL USE PATTERNS 6 2.1 Use patterns at the commencement of the review 6 2.2 Current use patterns (2011) 8 3. DATA ASSESSMENTS 10 3.1 Toxicology 10 3.1.1 Consideration of public health standards 10 3.1.2 Consideration of additional information 11 3.1.3 Discussion 17 3.2 Occupational health and safety (OHS) 20 3.2.1 Interim report 20 3.2.2 Assessment of additional information 21 3.2.3 Occupational exposure 23 3.2.4 Exposure assessment 25 3.2.5 Occupational risk assessment 36 3.2.6 Summary and conclusions 45 3.2.7 Review outcomes 46 3.3 Environment 49 3.3.1 Conclusions from the interim report 49 3.3.2 Supplementary data assessment 51 Summary 65 3.4 Residues 66 3.4.1 Interim report 66 3.4.2 Recent consideration 68 4 OVERSEAS REGULATORY ACTION 69 United States 69 Europe 69 5 REVIEW STATUS 70 iv APPENDIX A—ACTIVE CONSTITUENT AND PRODUCTS INCLUDED IN THE REVIEW 72 APPENDIX B—MAIN TOXICOLOGY ASSESSMENT 73 Study: Beyrouty P (2001) 73 Results 76 Studies: Weiler MS (1999b)and Gains M (1999b) 82 Results 84 FOB findings 84 Motor activity 84 Consumption of test diets 84 Consumption of test substance 85 Cholinesterase activity 85 Histopathology 87 Comments 88 Studies: Cockrell (), Brennecke (1996), O’Shaughnessy D (2000) and Jortner BS (2001) 89 Cockrell (1992) 89 Brennecke (1996) 91 O’Shaughnessy (2000) 92 Jortner (2001) 94 Results 94 Comments 96 APPENDIX C—OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY STUDY DETAIL AND DISCUSSION 97 Worker exposure to parathion-methyl in the course of open mixing/loading 97 Worker exposure to parathion-methyl in the course of closed mixing/loading 105 Worker exposure to parathion-methyl in the course of application to potato (broadacre crops) 107 Worker exposure to parathion-methyl in the course of entering fields post application activities (re-entry exposure) 110 Determination of dislodgeable foliar residues (DFR) in plant foliage treated with parathion-methyl (Re-entry exposure) 116 DFR studies in apple crops 116 DFR studies in sweet corn 118 REFERENCES 128 Toxicology 128 Occupational health and safety 130 Environment 132 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS 133 v LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Crops on which parathion-methyl is used 1 Table 2: Products affected by review findings 2 Table 3: Active constituent information 9 Table 4: Oral neurotoxicity studies 14 Table 5: Dermal neurotoxicity studies 16 Table 6: PHED estimates of dermal and inhalation exposure to parathion-methyl during mixing/loading and application 25 Table 7: Summary of exposure studies for workers during mixing/loading and application of parathion-methyl products 26 Table 8: Dermal and inhalation exposure to parathion-methyl during mixing/loading and application estimated from PHED dataset 27 Table 9: Dermal exposure estimates to parathion-methyl calculated from the dislodgeable foliar residues (DFR) and transfer coefficient values for various re-entry activities in apple crops 28 Table 10: Transfer coefficients calculated for irrigation and harvesting of sweet corn 30 Table 11: Dermal exposure estimates to parathion-methyl, calculated from the dislodgeable foliar residues (DFR) and transfer coefficient (TC) values for various re-entry activities in sweet corn crops following parathion- methyl application (ME formulation) 31 Table 12: Transfer coefficient calculated for scouting of cotton crops 32 Table 13: Dermal exposure estimates to parathion-methyl, calculated from dislodgeable foliar residues (DFR) and transfer coefficients for various re-entry activities in cotton crops following parathion-methyl application (ME formulation) 33 Table 14: Dermal exposure estimates to parathion-methyl, calculated from dislodgeable foliar residues (DFR) and transfer coefficients for various re-entry activities in cotton crops following parathion-methyl application (EC formulation) 35 Table 15: MOEa for workers mixing/loading (for aerial and ground application) and applying parathion-methyl to broadacre crops (ground application) 38 Table 16: Margin of exposure (MOEa) for workers mixing/loading (open and closed systems) and applying parathion-methyl to broadacre crops (PHED estimates) 39 Table 17: Margin of exposure (MOE1) for re-entry activities determined from dislodgeable foliar residues (DFR) after application of two different products of parathion-methyl on apples and using generic2 transfer coefficients for apple crops. 40 Table 18: Margin of exposure (MOE) for re-entry activities determined from the DFR values following application of ME formulation of parathion-methyl on sweet corn and using calculated2 and generic3 transfer 1 coefficients (TC) for sweet corn 43 Table 19: Margin of Exposure (MOE) for re-entry activities determined from the DFR values following application of two different formulations of parathion-methyl in cotton crops and using calculated2 and generic3 transfer coefficients (TC) for cotton 44 Table 20: Toxicity results (in g/L) for individual actives 53 Table 21: Toxicity results for the combined toxicity
Recommended publications
  • COMBINED LIST of Particularly Hazardous Substances
    COMBINED LIST of Particularly Hazardous Substances revised 2/4/2021 IARC list 1 are Carcinogenic to humans list compiled by Hector Acuna, UCSB IARC list Group 2A Probably carcinogenic to humans IARC list Group 2B Possibly carcinogenic to humans If any of the chemicals listed below are used in your research then complete a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for the product as described in the Chemical Hygiene Plan. Prop 65 known to cause cancer or reproductive toxicity Material(s) not on the list does not preclude one from completing an SOP. Other extremely toxic chemicals KNOWN Carcinogens from National Toxicology Program (NTP) or other high hazards will require the development of an SOP. Red= added in 2020 or status change Reasonably Anticipated NTP EPA Haz list COMBINED LIST of Particularly Hazardous Substances CAS Source from where the material is listed. 6,9-Methano-2,4,3-benzodioxathiepin, 6,7,8,9,10,10- hexachloro-1,5,5a,6,9,9a-hexahydro-, 3-oxide Acutely Toxic Methanimidamide, N,N-dimethyl-N'-[2-methyl-4-[[(methylamino)carbonyl]oxy]phenyl]- Acutely Toxic 1-(2-Chloroethyl)-3-(4-methylcyclohexyl)-1-nitrosourea (Methyl-CCNU) Prop 65 KNOWN Carcinogens NTP 1-(2-Chloroethyl)-3-cyclohexyl-1-nitrosourea (CCNU) IARC list Group 2A Reasonably Anticipated NTP 1-(2-Chloroethyl)-3-cyclohexyl-1-nitrosourea (CCNU) (Lomustine) Prop 65 1-(o-Chlorophenyl)thiourea Acutely Toxic 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane IARC list Group 2B 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Prop 65 IARC list Group 2B 1,1-Dichloro-2,2-bis(p -chloropheny)ethylene (DDE) Prop 65 1,1-Dichloroethane
    [Show full text]
  • 2002 NRP Section 6, Tables 6.1 Through
    Table 6.1 Scoring Table for Pesticides 2002 FSIS NRP, Domestic Monitoring Plan } +1 0.05] COMPOUND/COMPOUND CLASS * ) (EPA) (EPA) (EPA) (EPA) (EPA) (FSIS) (FSIS) PSI (P) TOX.(T) L-1 HIST. VIOL. BIOCON. (B) {[( (2*R+P+B)/4]*T} REG. CON. (R) * ENDO. DISRUP. LACK INFO. (L) LACK INFO. {[ Benzimidazole Pesticides in FSIS Benzimidazole MRM (5- 131434312.1 hydroxythiabendazole, benomyl (as carbendazim), thiabendazole) Carbamates in FSIS Carbamate MRM (aldicarb, aldicarb sulfoxide, NA44234416.1 aldicarb sulfone, carbaryl, carbofuran, carbofuran 3-hydroxy) Carbamates NOT in FSIS Carbamate MRM (carbaryl 5,6-dihydroxy, chlorpropham, propham, thiobencarb, 4-chlorobenzylmethylsulfone,4- NT 4 1 3 NV 4 4 13.8 chlorobenzylmethylsulfone sulfoxide) CHC's and COP's in FSIS CHC/COP MRM (HCB, alpha-BHC, lindane, heptachlor, dieldrin, aldrin, endrin, ronnel, linuron, oxychlordane, chlorpyrifos, nonachlor, heptachlor epoxide A, heptachlor epoxide B, endosulfan I, endosulfan I sulfate, endosulfan II, trans- chlordane, cis-chlordane, chlorfenvinphos, p,p'-DDE, p, p'-TDE, o,p'- 3444NV4116.0 DDT, p,p'-DDT, carbophenothion, captan, tetrachlorvinphos [stirofos], kepone, mirex, methoxychlor, phosalone, coumaphos-O, coumaphos-S, toxaphene, famphur, PCB 1242, PCB 1248, PCB 1254, PCB 1260, dicofol*, PBBs*, polybrominated diphenyl ethers*, deltamethrin*) (*identification only) COP's and OP's NOT in FSIS CHC/COP MRM (azinphos-methyl, azinphos-methyl oxon, chlorpyrifos, coumaphos, coumaphos oxon, diazinon, diazinon oxon, diazinon met G-27550, dichlorvos, dimethoate, dimethoate
    [Show full text]
  • Lifetime Organophosphorous Insecticide Use Among Private Pesticide Applicators in the Agricultural Health Study
    Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology (2012) 22, 584 -- 592 & 2012 Nature America, Inc. All rights reserved 1559-0631/12 www.nature.com/jes ORIGINAL ARTICLE Lifetime organophosphorous insecticide use among private pesticide applicators in the Agricultural Health Study Jane A. Hoppin1, Stuart Long2, David M. Umbach3, Jay H. Lubin4, Sarah E. Starks5, Fred Gerr5, Kent Thomas6, Cynthia J. Hines7, Scott Weichenthal8, Freya Kamel1, Stella Koutros9, Michael Alavanja9, Laura E. Beane Freeman9 and Dale P. Sandler1 Organophosphorous insecticides (OPs) are the most commonly used insecticides in US agriculture, but little information is available regarding specific OP use by individual farmers. We describe OP use for licensed private pesticide applicators from Iowa and North Carolina in the Agricultural Health Study (AHS) using lifetime pesticide use data from 701 randomly selected male participants collected at three time periods. Of 27 OPs studied, 20 were used by 41%. Overall, 95% had ever applied at least one OP. The median number of different OPs used was 4 (maximum ¼ 13). Malathion was the most commonly used OP (74%) followed by chlorpyrifos (54%). OP use declined over time. At the first interview (1993--1997), 68% of participants had applied OPs in the past year; by the last interview (2005--2007), only 42% had. Similarly, median annual application days of OPs declined from 13.5 to 6 days. Although OP use was common, the specific OPs used varied by state, time period, and individual. Much of the variability in OP use was associated with the choice of OP, rather than the frequency or duration of application.
    [Show full text]
  • Liquid and Gas Chromatographic Multi-Residue Pesticide Determination in Animal Tissues
    Pestic. Sci. 1997, 49,56È64 Liquid and Gas Chromatographic Multi-residue Pesticide Determination in Animal Tissues Aurora Navas Dj az,* Angeles Garcj a Pareja & Francisco Garcj aSanchez Departamento de Qu•mica Anal•tica, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Malaga, 29071-Malaga, Spain (Received 13 June 1995; revised version received 17 April 1996; accepted 16 August 1996) Abstract: A liquid chromatography multi-residue method with photometric detection has been developed. The method is applicable to the quantitative deter- mination of organochlorine (tetradifon, dicofol, chlorfenson, chlorobenzilate), organophosphorus (fenitrothion, azinphos-ethyl) and carbamate (pirimicarb) pesticides in animal tissues. The extracted residues are cleaned up by gel- permeation chromatography. A further fractionation on silica Sep-Pack car- tridges is included in the procedure. A gas chromatographic method with electron-capture detection for the analysis of the same pesticides was carried out and the results in the two cases compared. Lower detection and quantitation limits and similar recoveries of pesticides from spiked pig liver and brain samples were obtained by the LC method. Key words: liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, multi-residue pesti- cides, animal tissues 1 INTRODUCTION by various element-sensitive detectors, leading to reli- ance on mass spectrometry because of its ability to help Pest control in modern agriculture includes treatment to deÐne the structure. This has especially been true in of crops pre- and post-harvest with a variety of chemi- the case of the combination of gas chromatography cals, such as herbicides and insecticides in the pre- with mass spectrometry (GC/MS). One of the obvious harvest stage and with fungicides and rodenticides in Ðelds of application for this technique was the analysis the storage stage of the total harvest process.
    [Show full text]
  • NIOSH Method 5600: Organophosphorus Pesticides
    ORGANOPHOSPHORUS PESTICIDES 5600 Formula: Table 1 MW: Table 1 CAS: Table 1 RTECS: Table 1 METHOD: 5600, Issue 1 EVALUATION: FULL Issue 1: 15 August 1994 OSHA : Table 2 PROPERTIES: Table 3 NIOSH: Table 2 ACGIH: Table 2 SYNONYMS: Table 4 SAMPLING MEASUREMENT SAMPLER: FILTER/SOLID SORBENT TUBE (OVS-2 tube: TECHNIQUE: GC, FLAME PHOTOMETRIC DETECTION 13-mm quartz filter; XAD-2, 270 mg/140 mg) (FPD) FLOW RATE: 0.2 to 1 L/min ANALYTE: organophosphorus pesticides, Table 1 VOL-MIN: 12 L EXTRACTION: 2-mL 90% toluene/10% acetone solution -MAX: 240 L; 60 L (Malathion, Ronnel) INJECTION SHIPMENT: cap both ends of tube VOLUME: 1-2 µL SAMPLE TEMPERATURE STABILITY: at least 10 days at 25 °C -INJECTION: 240 °C at least 30 days at 0 °C -DETECTOR: 180 °C to 215 °C (follow manufacturer's recommendation) BLANKS: 2 to 10 field blanks per set -COLUMN: Table 6 CARRIER GAS: He at 15 psi (104 kPa) ACCURACY COLUMN: fused silica capillary column; Table 6 RANGE STUDIED: Table 5, Column A DETECTOR: FPD (phosphorus mode) ACCURACY: Table 5, Column B CALIBRATION: standard solutions of organophosphorus compounds in toluene BIAS: Table 5, Column C RANGE: Table 8, Column C ˆ OVERALL PRECISION (S rT): Table 5, Column D ESTIMATED LOD: Table 8, Column F PRECISION (S r): Table 5, Column E APPLICABILITY: The working ranges are listed in Table 5. They cover a range of 1/10 to 2 times the OSHA PELs. This INTERFERENCES: Several organophosphates may co-elute method also is applicable to STEL measurements using 12-L with either target analyte or internal standard causing samples.
    [Show full text]
  • Parathion-Methyl
    FAO SPECIFICATIONS AND EVALUATIONS FOR PLANT PROTECTION PRODUCTS PARATHION-METHYL O,O-dimethyl O-4-nitrophenyl phosphorothioate 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS PARATHION-METHYL Page DISCLAIMER 3 INTRODUCTION 4 PART ONE 5 SPECIFICATIONS FOR PARATHION-METHYL PARATHION-METHYL INFORMATIONERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED. PARATHION-METHYL TECHNICAL MATERIAL 6 PARATHION-METHYL TECHNICAL CONCENTRATE 8 PARATHION-METHYL EMULSIFIABLE CONCENTRATE 10 PART TWO 13 2001 EVALUATION REPORT ON PARATHION-METHYL 14 Page 2 of 31 PARATHION-METHYL SPECIFICATIONS 2001 Disclaimer1 FAO specifications are developed with the basic objective of ensuring that pesticides complying with them are satisfactory for the purpose for which they are intended so that they may serve as an international point of reference. The specifications do not constitute an endorsement or warranty of the use of a particular pesticide for a particular purpose. Neither do they constitute a warranty that pesticides complying with these specifications are suitable for the control of any given pest, or for use in a particular area. Owing to the complexity of the problems involved, the suitability of pesticides for a particular application must be decided at the national or provincial level. Furthermore, the preparation and use of pesticides complying with these specifications are not exempted from any safety regulation or other legal or administrative provision applicable thereto. FAO shall not be liable for any injury, loss, damage or prejudice of any kind that may be suffered as a result of the preparation, transportation, sale or use of pesticides complying with these specifications. Additionally, FAO wishes to alert users of specifications to the fact that improper field mixing and/or application of pesticides can result in either a lowering or complete loss of efficacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Variation in Non-Target Effects of the Insecticides Chlorpyrifos
    Pesticide Science Pestic Sci 55:875±886 (1999) Spatial variation in non-target effects of the insecticides chlorpyrifos, cypermethrin and pirimicarb on Collembola in winter wheat Geoffrey K Frampton* Biodiversity and Ecology Division, School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Bassett Crescent East, Southampton, SO16 7PX, UK Abstract: Contiguous winter wheat ®elds of similar cropping history and soil type were used in a study of the responses of Collembola to summer sprays of cypermethrin and pirimicarb in southern England. Chlorpyrifos was included in the study as a toxic standard. Epigeic arthropods were captured by suction sampling and crop-inhabiting species obtained by dissecting wheat ears. Eight genera of Collembola responded signi®cantly to the insecticide treatments. Collembolan abundance decreased after chlorpyrifos was applied but increased after use of cypermethrin. Negative effects of cypermethrin and pirimicarb on Collembola were not detected in this study. Effects of chlorpyrifos varied spatially as a result of faunal heterogeneity among the ®elds, despite apparent homogeneity of the site. Some species known to be susceptible to chlorpyrifos were absent from one or more of the ®elds. The implications of these ®ndings for the interpretation of non-target pesticide effects and the potential use of Collembola as bioindicators in ®eld studies with pesticides are discussed. # 1999 Society of Chemical Industry Keywords: insecticides; chlorpyrifos; cypermethrin; pirimicarb; Collembola; side-effects; bioindicators
    [Show full text]
  • Reactivity)And)Continued)Activity)Of)Immobilized)Zinc)
    ! ! REACTIVITY)AND)CONTINUED)ACTIVITY)OF)IMMOBILIZED)ZINC) OXIDE)NANOPARTICLES)ON)METHYL)PARATHION) DECONTAMINATION) ! ! ! A!Thesis! Presented!to!the!Faculty!of!the!Graduate!School! of!Cornell!University! In!Partial!Fulfillment!of!the!Requirements!for!the!Degree!of! Master!of!Science! ! ! ! ! By!Yunfei!Han! May!2014! ) ) ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ©!Yunfei!Han!2014! ALL!RIGHTS!RESERVED! ! ! ! ! ! ABSTRACT) Photocatalytic! degradation! activity! and! reusability! of! ZnO! nanoparticles! and! immobilized! ZnO! in! polyacrylonitrile! (PAN)! nanofibers! were! investigated.! It! was! found! that! photocatalytic! degradation! using! ZnO! is! a! rapid! and! effective! way! to! degrade! methyl! parathion.! The! photocatalytic! degradation! reactivity! of! ZnO! nanoparticles! remained! in! four! cycles! with! some! loss! of! activity,! while! the! photocatalytic!degradation!reactivity!of!ZnO/PAN!nanofibers!remained!in!five!cycles! with!no!loss!of!activity!detected.!By!analyzing!samples!using!HPLC!chromatograms,! mass!spectra,!UVXvis!spectra,!calculated!octanolXwater!partition!coefficients,!and!31P! NMR! spectrum,! it! was! shown! that! the! possible! mechanism! of! the! photocatalytic! degradation!in!water/ethanol!is!predominated!by!hydrolysis.! ! iii! ! BIOGRAPHICAL)SKETCH) Yunfei!Han!was!born!and!raised!in!Shanghai,!P.R.!China.!Before!beginning!her! M.S.!study!in!Fiber!Science!program!at!Cornell!University,!she!earned!a!B.E.!degree! in!the!field!of!Textile!Science!and!Engineering!from!Donghua!University,!Shanghai,!P.! R.!China.!During!her!undergraduate!study,!she!spent!her!senior!year!in!UC!Davis!as!
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Advances on Detection of Insecticides Using Optical Sensors
    sensors Review Recent Advances on Detection of Insecticides Using Optical Sensors Nurul Illya Muhamad Fauzi 1, Yap Wing Fen 1,2,*, Nur Alia Sheh Omar 1,2 and Hazwani Suhaila Hashim 2 1 Functional Devices Laboratory, Institute of Advanced Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia; [email protected] (N.I.M.F.); [email protected] (N.A.S.O.) 2 Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Insecticides are enormously important to industry requirements and market demands in agriculture. Despite their usefulness, these insecticides can pose a dangerous risk to the safety of food, environment and all living things through various mechanisms of action. Concern about the environmental impact of repeated use of insecticides has prompted many researchers to develop rapid, economical, uncomplicated and user-friendly analytical method for the detection of insecticides. In this regards, optical sensors are considered as favorable methods for insecticides analysis because of their special features including rapid detection time, low cost, easy to use and high selectivity and sensitivity. In this review, current progresses of incorporation between recognition elements and optical sensors for insecticide detection are discussed and evaluated well, by categorizing it based on insecticide chemical classes, including the range of detection and limit of detection. Additionally, this review aims to provide powerful insights to researchers for the future development of optical sensors in the detection of insecticides. Citation: Fauzi, N.I.M.; Fen, Y.W.; Omar, N.A.S.; Hashim, H.S. Recent Keywords: insecticides; optical sensor; recognition element Advances on Detection of Insecticides Using Optical Sensors.
    [Show full text]
  • High Hazard Chemical Policy
    Environmental Health & Safety Policy Manual Issue Date: 2/23/2011 Policy # EHS-200.09 High Hazard Chemical Policy 1.0 PURPOSE: To minimize hazardous exposures to high hazard chemicals which include select carcinogens, reproductive/developmental toxins, chemicals that have a high degree of toxicity. 2.0 SCOPE: The procedures provide guidance to all LSUHSC personnel who work with high hazard chemicals. 3.0 REPONSIBILITIES: 3.1 Environmental Health and Safety (EH&S) shall: • Provide technical assistance with the proper handling and safe disposal of high hazard chemicals. • Maintain a list of high hazard chemicals used at LSUHSC, see Appendix A. • Conduct exposure assessments and evaluate exposure control measures as necessary. Maintain employee exposure records. • Provide emergency response for chemical spills. 3.2 Principle Investigator (PI) /Supervisor shall: • Develop and implement a laboratory specific standard operation plan for high hazard chemical use per OSHA 29CFR 1910.1450 (e)(3)(i); Occupational Exposure to Hazardous Chemicals in Laboratories. • Notify EH&S of the addition of a high hazard chemical not previously used in the laboratory. • Ensure personnel are trained on specific chemical hazards present in the lab. • Maintain Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) for all chemicals, either on the computer hard drive or in hard copy. • Coordinate the provision of medical examinations, exposure monitoring and recordkeeping as required. 3.3 Employees: • Complete all necessary training before performing any work. • Observe all safety
    [Show full text]
  • List of Extremely Hazardous Substances
    Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Facility Reporting Compliance Manual List of Extremely Hazardous Substances Threshold Threshold Quantity (TQ) Reportable Planning (pounds) Quantity Quantity (Industry Use (pounds) (pounds) CAS # Chemical Name Only) (Spill/Release) (LEPC Use Only) 75-86-5 Acetone Cyanohydrin 500 10 1,000 1752-30-3 Acetone Thiosemicarbazide 500/500 1,000 1,000/10,000 107-02-8 Acrolein 500 1 500 79-06-1 Acrylamide 500/500 5,000 1,000/10,000 107-13-1 Acrylonitrile 500 100 10,000 814-68-6 Acrylyl Chloride 100 100 100 111-69-3 Adiponitrile 500 1,000 1,000 116-06-3 Aldicarb 100/500 1 100/10,000 309-00-2 Aldrin 500/500 1 500/10,000 107-18-6 Allyl Alcohol 500 100 1,000 107-11-9 Allylamine 500 500 500 20859-73-8 Aluminum Phosphide 500 100 500 54-62-6 Aminopterin 500/500 500 500/10,000 78-53-5 Amiton 500 500 500 3734-97-2 Amiton Oxalate 100/500 100 100/10,000 7664-41-7 Ammonia 500 100 500 300-62-9 Amphetamine 500 1,000 1,000 62-53-3 Aniline 500 5,000 1,000 88-05-1 Aniline, 2,4,6-trimethyl- 500 500 500 7783-70-2 Antimony pentafluoride 500 500 500 1397-94-0 Antimycin A 500/500 1,000 1,000/10,000 86-88-4 ANTU 500/500 100 500/10,000 1303-28-2 Arsenic pentoxide 100/500 1 100/10,000 1327-53-3 Arsenous oxide 100/500 1 100/10,000 7784-34-1 Arsenous trichloride 500 1 500 7784-42-1 Arsine 100 100 100 2642-71-9 Azinphos-Ethyl 100/500 100 100/10,000 86-50-0 Azinphos-Methyl 10/500 1 10/10,000 98-87-3 Benzal Chloride 500 5,000 500 98-16-8 Benzenamine, 3-(trifluoromethyl)- 500 500 500 100-14-1 Benzene, 1-(chloromethyl)-4-nitro- 500/500
    [Show full text]
  • Gas-Phase Chemical Reduction (GPCR)
    Gas-Phase Chemical Reduction (GPCR) Name of Process: Status: Gas-Phase Chemical Reduction (GPCR) A Commercial system operated in Australia for more than 5 years, treating Vendor: more than 2,500 tons of PCB’s, DDT and other POPs. In 1999 a full-scale test ELI Eco Logic International Inc. on HCB was conducted using the commercial plant. Web site: http://www.ecologic.ca Eco Logic’s partners in Japan have recently built a semi-mobile GPCR plant for Applicable Pesticides and related the treatment of PCB wastes, which will be operational in 2003. POPs wastes: Pesticides such as Hexachlorobenzene, In combination with Foster Wheeler and Kvaerner the company is DDT, Aldrin, Dieldrin, HCB’s, DDT, PCB’s, participating at present in the ACWA (Army Chemical Weapons Assessment) dioxins and furans and other POPs. Program for the destruction of chemical warfare agents. Eco Logic has partnered with Torftech Inc. for the treatment of soils and sediments at rates of up to 20 tons per hour. Eco Logic has also been selected by UNIDO for a pilot project for treatment of 1000 tons of PCB wastes in Slovakia. Additional approvals received: -for PCB and dioxin waste in Japan -for PCB’s TSCA permit in USA -for PCB’s and other toxic compounds in the Province of Ontario (Canada) Technology description: Eco Logic’s GPCR technology involves the gas-phase chemical reduction of organic compounds by hydrogen at a temperature of 850°C or higher. Chlorinated hydrocarbons, such as HCB, polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (dioxins) and other POPs, are chemically reduced to methane and hydrogen chloride (HCl).
    [Show full text]