DOCSLIB.ORG

Plantagenet Dynasty

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

PLANTAGENET 1. GEOFFREY PLANTAGENET (nicknamed le Bel), Count of Anjou and Maine, Knt., son and heir of Foulques V le Jeune, Count of Anjou, King of Jerusalem, by his 1st wife, Eremburge, Countess of Maine, daughter and heiress of Hélie, Count of Maine, born 24 Nov. 1113. He married at Le Mans, Maine 17 June 1128 MAUD OF ENGLAND, Empress of Almain, sometimes styled “Lady of the English” (rarely “Queen of the English”), widow of Henry V, Emperor of Almain (died 23 May 1125), and daughter and heiress of Henry I, King of England, Duke of Normandy, by his 1st wife, Maud, daughter of Malcolm III (Canmore), King of Scotland. She was born at London 7 Feb. 1102. They had three sons (see below). By an unknown mistress (or mistresses), Geoffrey also had one son, Hamelin [5th Earl of Surrey], and two daughters, Emme and Mary (nun) [Abbess of Shaftesbury]. Maud was declared heir presumptive to her father in 1126. On her father, King Henry I’s death in 1135, she at once entered Normandy to claim her inheritance. The border districts submitted to her, but England chose her cousin, Stephen, for its king, and Normandy soon followed suit. The following year, Geoffrey gave Ambrières, Gorron, and Châtilon-sur-Colmont to Juhel de Mayenne, on condition that he help obtain the inheritance of Geoffrey’s wife, Maud. In 1139 Maud landed in England with 140 knights, where she was besieged at Arundel Castle by King Stephen. In the civil war which ensued, Stephen was captured at Lincoln in Feb. 1141 and imprisoned at Bristol. A legatine council of the English church held at Winchester in April 1141 declared Stephen deposed and proclaimed Maud “Lady of the English.” Stephen was subsequently released from prison and had himself recrowned on the anniversary of his first coronation. During 1142 and 1143, Geoffrey secured all of Normandy west and south of the Seine, and, on 14 Jan. 1144, he crossed the Seine and entered Rouen. He assumed the title of Duke of Normandy in summer 1144. In 1144 he founded an Augustine priory at Château-l’Ermitage in Anjou. Geoffrey held the duchy until 1149, when he and Maud conjointly ceded it to their son, Henry, which cession was formally ratified by King Louis VII of France the following year. GEOFFREY, Count of Anjou and Maine, died at Château-du-Loir 7 Sept. 1151, and was buried in St. Julien’s, Le Mans, Maine. In 1153 the Treaty of Westminster allowed Stephen should remain King of England for life and that Maud’s son, Henry, should succeed him. MAUD, late Empress of Almain, died at Rouen, Normandy 10 Sept. 1167, and was buried at Bec Abbey. At her death, her wealth was distributed to the poor, and to various hospitals, churches, and monasteries. F. Sandford Gen. Hist. of the Kings of England (1677): 34–37. Père Anselme Hist. de la Maison Royale de France 6 (1730): 3–21 (sub Anjou). W. Dugdale Monasticon Anglicanum 3 (1821): 20 (Robert, Earl of Gloucester, styled “my brother” [fratre meo] by Empress Maud). F. Somménil Chronicon Valassense (1868): 20, 104–108 (Maud, Abbess of Montivilliers, styled “sister” [soror] of Empress Maud). T. Wright Feudal Manuals of English Hist. (1872). W. Stubbs Hist. Works of Master Ralph de Diceto, Dean of London 1 (Rolls Ser. 68) (1876): 293 (sub 1150: “Dum Gaufridus Plantegenest comes Andegavorum rediret Parisius a curia regis Francorum, concessit in fata apud Castrum Lidii, sepultus est autem Cenomannis in ecclesia Sancti Juliani.”). C. de Montzey Hist. de la Flèche 1 (1877): 96–135. R.W. Eyton Court, Household and Itinerary of Henry II (1878): 75n, 85n, 182, 244, 319, Index, sub tit. ‘Anjou, Comtes of.’ G. Demay Inventaire des Sceaux de la Normandie (1881): 4 (equestrian seal of Geoffrey Plantagenet). L. Delisle Cartulaire Normand (1882): 2. A. Luchaire Études sur les Actes de Louis VII (1885): 138. B. de Broussillon Sigillographie des Seigneurs de Laval 1095–1605 (1888). J. Delaville le Roulx Cartulaire Général de l’Ordre des Hospitaliers de S. Jean de Jérusalem 1 (1894): 108, 125–128, 180. Genealogist n.s. 13 (1896): 1–10. J.H. Round Cal. of Docs. Preserved in France 1 (1899): 32–34 (charter names Geoffrey’s brother, Hélie), 518, 539. E. Vallée Cartulaire de Château-du-Loir (1905): 30–31, 45–47, 55–61, 97, 161–162. L. Froger Inventaire des Titres de l’Abbaye de Beaulieu du Mans: 1124–1413 (1907): 4. C. Urseau Cartulaire Noir de la Cathédrale d’Angers (1908): 225–228, 286–288, 311–314, 352– 354. L. Delisle Recueil des Actes de Henri II, Roi d’Angleterre et Duc de Normandie Introduction (1909): 135–144. D.N.B. 13 (1909): 54–58 (biog. of Empress Maud: “… In (her) later years the harsh and violent temper which had marred one period of her career seems to have been completely mastered by the real nobleness of character… Germans, Normans, and English are agreed as to her beauty”); 15 (1909): 1284– 1285 (“… Inveterate usage has attached the surname Plantagenet to the great house which occupied the English throne from 1154 to 1485, but the family did not assume the surname until the middle of the fifteenth century”). English Hist. Rev. 27 (1912): 417–444; 42 (1927): 569– 572; 76 (1961): 649–654. C.P.R. 1266–1272 (1913): 206–207 (example of usage of title “Empress of Almain” for Maud). A. Angot Généalogies Féodales Mayennaises du XIe au XIIIe Siècle (1942): 567. C. Hatton Book of Seals (1950): 353–354. J. Boussard Le Gouvernement d’Henri II Plantagenet (1956). H.W.C. Davis Regesta Regum Anglo-Normannorum 1066–1154 3 (1968): 43, 156–157, 223–224, 233–235, 258, 331. G. Paget Lineage & Anc. of Prince Charles 1 (1977): 14. D. Schwennicke Europäische Stammtafeln 2 (1984): 82 (sub Anjou) (erroneously identifies Emme, wife of Guy [V] “Sire de Laval as a legitimate daughter of Geoffrey, Count of Anjou). E.B. Fryde Handbook of British Chron. (1986): 35. Fam. Hist. 14 (1987): 69–79. H.M.W. Winter Descs. of Charlemagne (800–1400) (1987): XII.9, XIII.15, XIII.992–994, XIV.23. Trans. Royal Hist. Soc. 5th Ser. 38 (1988): 107–130. D. Williamson Kings and Queens of Britain (1991): 53. F. Barlow Feudal Kingdom of England 1042–1216 (1999). N. Vincent “William Marshal, King Henry II and the Honour of Chateauroux” Archives: Jour. of the British Rec. Assoc. 25 (2000) footnotes 64, 69 [corrects R.W. Eyton Court, Household and Itinerary of Henry II (1878): 85n, 319, and 17th Century genealogy of Chauvigny family (Bibliothèque Nationale Ms. Français 16789 f.37), both of which allege Raoul de Déols (died 1176), seigneur of Chateauroux in Barry, married a sister of King Henry II; see also C.P. 4 (1916): 313–314 (sub Devon) for evidence proving that Raoul de Déols married Agnes, daughter of Ebbes V, seigneur of Charenton, by whom he left a daughter and heiress, Denise (wife successively of Baldwin de Reviers, 3rd Earl of Devon, André de Chauvigny, and William, Count of Sancerre)]. Children of Geoffrey Plantagenet, by Maud of England: i. HENRY II OF ENGLAND [see next]. ii. GEOFFREY, Knt., Count of Anjou and Nantes, held the castles of Chinon (Indre-et-Loire), Loudon (Vienne), and Mirebeau (Vienne) in France as his appanage, 2nd son, born at Rouen, Normandy about 1 June 1134. He died without issue 26 July 1158. F. Sandford Gen. Hist. of the Kings of England (1677): 37. E. Vallée Cartulaire de Château-du-Loir (1905): 46–47, 96–97, 161–162. L. Delisle Recueil des Actes de Henri II, Roi d’Angleterre et Duc de Normandie Introduction (1909): 370. J. Boussard Le Gouvernement d’Henri II Plantagenet (1956). J. Le Patourel Feudal Empires: Norman and Plantagenet 9 (1984): 1–17. F. Barlow Feudal Kingdom of England 1042–1216 (1999). M. Chibnall Piety, Power and History in Medieval England and Normandy (2000): XIV 111. iii. WILLIAM LONGESPÉE (otherwise WILLIAM FITZ EMPRESS), Vicomte of Dieppe, of Throwley, Kent, North Luffenham, Rutland, and Acton and Oulton, Suffolk, 3rd son, born at Argentan 21 July 1136. In 1158 he gave the nuns of St. Mary of Mortain 40 shillings of Anjou annually from his manor of Ste. Mère Eglise [Manche]. In the period, 1159–63, he sought to marry Isabel de Warenne, Countess of Surrey [see WARENNE 2], widow of his cousin, William, Count of Boulogne and Mortain (son of King Stephen of England). The marriage was opposed by Archbishop Becket on grounds of affinity (he and her former husband being related in the 3rd degree of kindred). WILLIAM LONGESPÉE died at Rouen, Normandy 30 Jan. 1163/4, and was buried there in the Cathedral. F. Sandford Gen. Hist. of the Kings of England (1677): 37. A. Deville Tombeaux de la Cathédral de Rouen (1881): 164–165, 210. J.H. Round Cal. of Documents Preserved in France 1 (1899): 285. L. Delisle Recueil des Actes de Henri II, Roi d’Angleterre et Duc de Normandie Introduction (1909): 487–490. Rotuli de Dominabus et Pueris et Puellis de XII Comitatibus [1185] (Pipe Roll Soc. 35) (1913): 60. F.M. Stenton Early Charters from Northamptonshire Colls. (1930): 24–26. Early Yorkshire Charters 8 (1949): 13–14. C. Hatton Book of Seals (1950): 299–300. J. Boussard Le Gouvernement d’Henri II Plantagenet (1956). Genealogists’ Mag. 14 (1964): 365. E. Mason Beauchamp Cartulary Charters 1100–1268 (Pubs. Pipe Roll Soc. n.s. 43) (1980): 104. Coat of Arms n.s. 5 (1983): 153–156. C. Given-Wilson Royal Bastards of Medieval England (1984): 100–102.
Recommended publications
  • Elizabeth Thomas Phd Thesis

    Elizabeth Thomas Phd Thesis

    'WE HAVE NOTHING MORE VALUABLE IN OUR TREASURY': ROYAL MARRIAGE IN ENGLAND, 1154-1272 Elizabeth Thomas A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 2010 Full metadata for this item is available in St Andrews Research Repository at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/2001 This item is protected by original copyright Declarations (i) I, Elizabeth Thomas, hereby certify that this thesis, which is approximately 80,000 words in length, has been written by me, that it is the record of work carried out by me and that it has not been submitted in any previous application for a higher degree. I was admitted as a research student in September, 2005 and as a candidate for the degree of Ph.D. in September, 2005, the higher study for which this is a record was carried out in the University of St Andrews between 2005 and 2009. Date: Signature of candidate: (ii) I hereby certify that the candidate has fulfilled the conditions of the Resolution and Regulations appropriate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University of St Andrews and that the candidate is qualified to submit this thesis in application for that degree. Date: Signature of supervisor: (iii) In submitting this thesis to the University of St Andrews we understand that we are giving permission for it to be made available for use in accordance with the regulations of the University Library for the time being in force, subject to any copyright vested in the work not being affected thereby.
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Marvelous Generations: Lancastrian Genealogies and Translation in Late Medieval and Early M

    UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Marvelous Generations: Lancastrian Genealogies and Translation in Late Medieval and Early M

    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Marvelous Generations: Lancastrian Genealogies and Translation in Late Medieval and Early Modern England and Iberia A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in English by Sara Victoria Torres 2014 © Copyright by Sara Victoria Torres 2014 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Marvelous Generations: Lancastrian Genealogies and Translation in Late Medieval and Early Modern England and Iberia by Sara Victoria Torres Doctor of Philosophy in English University of California, Los Angeles, 2014 Professor Christine Chism, Co-chair Professor Lowell Gallagher, Co-chair My dissertation, “Marvelous Generations: Lancastrian Genealogies and Translation in Late Medieval and Early Modern England and Iberia,” traces the legacy of dynastic internationalism in the fifteenth, sixteenth, and early-seventeenth centuries. I argue that the situated tactics of courtly literature use genealogical and geographical paradigms to redefine national sovereignty. Before the defeat of the Spanish Armada in 1588, before the divorce trials of Henry VIII and Catherine of Aragon in the 1530s, a rich and complex network of dynastic, economic, and political alliances existed between medieval England and the Iberian kingdoms. The marriages of John of Gaunt’s two daughters to the Castilian and Portuguese kings created a legacy of Anglo-Iberian cultural exchange ii that is evident in the literature and manuscript culture of both England and Iberia. Because England, Castile, and Portugal all saw the rise of new dynastic lines at the end of the fourteenth century, the subsequent literature produced at their courts is preoccupied with issues of genealogy, just rule, and political consent. Dynastic foundation narratives compensate for the uncertainties of succession by evoking the longue durée of national histories—of Trojan diaspora narratives, of Roman rule, of apostolic foundation—and situating them within universalizing historical modes.
  • History and Antiquities of Stratford-Upon-Avon

    History and Antiquities of Stratford-Upon-Avon

    IL LINO I S UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN PRODUCTION NOTE University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Library Brittle Books Project, 2009. UNIVERSrryOF ILLINOIS-URBANA ' 3 0112 079790793 C) c)J U0 CI 0F 622-5 CV157 111STORY & ANTIQUITIES STR4TF RkDi U]PO~A I1 ONA"r III c iI1Pir . i r M t a r HISTORY AND ANTIQUITIES OF 5TJRATFORDJPONAVON: fO MPRISI N C A DESCRIPTION OF THlE COLLEGIATE CHURCH,7 THE LIFE OF SJL4KSPEAJRJ, AN Copies of several Documents relating to him anti his Pamniy never before printed; WITH A 13IOGt4PII1C4L SKETCH OF OTHER -V MJNENT CILIRACT2PS , Natives of, or who have resided in STRITFORD, To which, is added, a particular Account of THE- JUBILEE, Celebrated at Stratford, in Honour of our immortal Bard, BYT R. B. WIIELER. 0 gratum Musis, 0 nornen. amabile Plwcbo, Qtam sociarn adsciscant, Minicius atque Meles. Ac tibi, cara hospes, si mens divinior, et te Ignea SiKSPEARI muss ciere queat; Siste gradum; crebroquc oculos circum undique liectas, Pierii lae inontes, hec tOb Pindus erit. &ttatfouYon5ivbon: PRTNTED AND~ SOLD BY J. WARD; SOLD ALSO BYVLONGISAN AND CO.PATERNOSTERa ROW, LONDON'S WILKS AND CO. BIRIMINGHAM, AN!) BY MOST OTHER BOOKSELLERS IN TOWN AND COUNTIRY W2,2. Z3 cws;-7 PREFACE., FIE want of a work in some degree sifilar to the. res sent undertaking eatcouraged the publication of the follow4 ilig sheets, the'offspring oft afew leisure hours; and it is hoped that the world will, on an impartial perusal, make aflowanees for the imperfections, by reflecting as well upon the inexperieace of the Jiuvenile author, as that they were originally collected for"his own private information.
  • The Kingship of David II (1329-71)

    The Kingship of David II (1329-71)

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Stirling Online Research Repository 1 The Kingship of David II (1329-71) Although he was an infant, and English sources would jibe that he soiled the coronation altar, David Bruce was the first king of Scots to receive full coronation and anointment. As such, his installation at Scone abbey on 24 November 1331 was another triumph for his father.1 The terms of the 1328 peace had stipulated that Edward III’s regime should help secure from Avignon both the lifting of Robert I’s excommunication and this parity of rite with the monarchies of England and France. David’s coronation must, then, have blended newly-borrowed traditions with established Scottish inaugural forms: it probably merged the introduction of the boy-king and the carrying of orb, sceptre and sword by the incumbents of ancient lines of earls, then unction and the taking of oaths to common law and church followed by a sermon by the new bishop of St Andrews, the recitation of royal genealogy in Gaelic and general homage, fealty and knighting of subjects alongside the king.2 Yet this display must also have been designed to reinforce the territorial claims of authority of the Bruce house in the presence of its allies and in-laws from the north, west and south-west of Scotland as well as the established Lowland political community. Finally, it was in part an impressive riposte to Edward II’s failed attempts to persuade the papacy of his claim for England’s kings to be anointed with the holy oil of Becket.3 1 Chronica Monasterii de Melsa, ed.
  • King George VI Wikipedia Page

    King George VI Wikipedia Page

    George VI of the United Kingdom - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 10/6/11 10:20 PM George VI of the United Kingdom From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (Redirected from King George VI) George VI (Albert Frederick Arthur George; 14 December 1895 – 6 February 1952) was King of the United Kingdom George VI and the Dominions of the British Commonwealth from 11 December 1936 until his death. He was the last Emperor of India, and the first Head of the Commonwealth. As the second son of King George V, he was not expected to inherit the throne and spent his early life in the shadow of his elder brother, Edward. He served in the Royal Navy and Royal Air Force during World War I, and after the war took on the usual round of public engagements. He married Lady Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon in 1923, and they had two daughters, Elizabeth and Margaret. George's elder brother ascended the throne as Edward VIII on the death of their father in 1936. However, less than a year later Edward revealed his desire to marry the divorced American socialite Wallis Simpson. British Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin advised Edward that for political and Formal portrait, c. 1940–46 religious reasons he could not marry Mrs Simpson and remain king. Edward abdicated in order to marry, and George King of the United Kingdom and the British ascended the throne as the third monarch of the House of Dominions (more...) Windsor. Reign 11 December 1936 – 6 February On the day of his accession, the parliament of the Irish Free 1952 State removed the monarch from its constitution.
  • Robin Hood and the Coterel Gang

    Robin Hood and the Coterel Gang

    Robin Hood Memories of the Coterel Gang Ron Catterall Copyright © 2007,2008 Ron Catterall All Rights Reserved. The right of Ron Catterall to be identified as author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Ron Catterall 1 Robin Hood 1. Introduction Lythe and listin, gentilmen, That be of frebore blode; I shall you tel of a gode yeman, His name was Robyn Hode. —Anonymous, ca.1350, A Gest of Robyn Hode 1-4 It would be very difficult, if not impossible, to find a member of the large Cotterell family who had never heard of Robin Hood, but how many Cotterells are aware that the activities of the Coterel Gang in Sherwood Forest in the early fourteenth century may well have been the original from which the Robin Hood legend derived. I think we all must have absorbed in childhood the links between Robin Hood, the Sheriff of Nottingham and Sherwood Forest, but attempts to identify Robin with a known historical character have never been generally accepted. The traditional picture comes from the work of Anthony Munday, a contemporary of William Shakespeare, in the period 1598-1601. The titles of his work contain almost all the elements of the Robin Hood we know today: “The Downfall of Robert, Earle of Huntington, Afterward called Robin Hood of merrie Sherwodde: with his love to chaste Matilda, the Lord Fitzwaters Daughter, afterwarde his faire Maide Marian” and “The Death of Robert, Earle of Huntington. Otherwise called Robin Hood of merrie Sherwodde: with the lamentable Tragedie of chaste Matilda, his faire maid Marian, poysoned at Dunmowe by King John”.
  • The Eructavit Is Generally Linked with Marie of Champagne. I Should Like

    The Eructavit Is Generally Linked with Marie of Champagne. I Should Like

    淡江人文社會學刊【第十期】 The Eructavit is generally linked with Marie of Champagne. I should like to demonstrate, however, that this Old French metrical paraphrase of Psalm XLIV (in the Vulgate edition) is inextricably linked with Marie of Brabant as well. In pursuing this link, I believe I can explain both the occasion and the content of (Paris, BN) Arsenal 3142, the manuscript generally thought to have been composed for Marie of Brabant. Furthermore, in so doing, I should like to establish a possible dating, as well as an occasion, for the Eructavit and for the Arsenal Manuscript 3142. In order to do this, I should like to introduce the setting in which the Eructavit was written, the people surrounding its production, and the familial ties connecting the existing manuscripts of the Eructavit to the Arsenal Manuscript 3142. I should then like to deal with the form of the Arsenal Manuscript in terms of the Eructavit and the 44th Psalm. Marie of France, the eldest daughter of Eleanor of Aquitaine and of Louis VII of France, was given in marriage in 1154 to Henry I, called the Liberal, of Champagne.(1) Henry of Champagne was a learned man, a recipient of sermons, commentaries on the Psalms, and liturgical pieces, including ten sequences (Benton, 1961, p. 556). John of Salisbury (who at the time of the Becket case was exiled from England and staying with his friend Pierre de Celle, then abbot of Saint-Remi-de Reims and friend as well of Henry) tells us of the “great pleasure which the Count Henry took in discussing literary subjects with learned men.”(2) Furthermore, Chretien de Troyes, Evrat, Gace Brule, Gautier d’Arras, and Simon Chevre d’Or, all known poets, acknowledge the personal intervention of Henry or Marie in their work.(3) The court of Champagne was well established as a center of learning and patronage.
  • Sources of Langham Local History Information 11Th C > 19Th C

    Sources of Langham Local History Information 11Th C > 19Th C

    Langham in Rutland Local History Sources of Information Compiled by Nigel Webb Revision 2 - 11 November 2020 Contents Introduction 11th to 13th century 14th century 15th century 16th century 17th century 18th century 19th century Please select one of the above Introduction The intention of this list of possible sources is to provide starting points for researchers. Do not be put off by the length of the list: you will probably need only a fraction of it. For the primary sources – original documents or transcriptions of these – efforts have been made to include everything which might be productive. If you know of or find further such sources which should be on this list, please tell the Langham Village History Group archivist so that they can be added. If you find a source that we have given particularly productive, please tell us what needs it has satisfied; if you are convinced that it is a waste of time, please tell us this too! For the secondary sources – books, journals and internet sites – we have tried to include just enough useful ones, whatever aspect of Langham history that you might wish to investigate. However, we realise that there is then a danger of the list looking discouragingly long. Probably you will want to look at only a fraction of these. For many of the books, just a single chapter or a small section found from the index, or even a sentence, here and there, useful for quotation, is all that you may want. But, again, if you find or know of further especially useful sources, please tell us.
  • Durrington & Larkhill Design Statement

    Durrington & Larkhill Design Statement

    DURRINGTON & LARKHILL DESIGN STATEMENT March 2012 Content Introduction The history of Durrington is fully described in section 4 and within the Parish Plan. The purpose of the VDS is not to prevent change, but to help manage acceptable change. The draft VDS was sent to every organisation in the village and a public exhibition was also held to which the village residents were invited. The VDS has been prepared by Durrington Residents in association with Durrington Town Council. Every planning application is an opportunity to enhance the village. However there are many kinds of alterations and additions to houses for which you do not need to apply for planning permission. For guidance please go to www.wiltshire.gov.uk/householders-guide-3 Landscape Roads and Traffic Management Community Safety for new properties Aim Statement The aim of this village design statement How is the Statement to be used? is to ensure that the design of any future The Statement has been approved by Wiltshire Council as a material planning consideration and is for the use of all involved in the development development and any change to existing process. It will also help inform the wider public on the distinctive characteristics of Durrington. This Statement takes account of policies of Wiltshire Council dwellings in Durrington are based on an which reflect government guidance. understanding of the village past and present character and of its environmental setting, so that it can contribute sensitively to the protection and improvement of Durrington. The document therefore aims to offer design advice on the preservation of the present character of the village in the relationships between the conservation area, buildings, open spaces, the treatment of boundaries and the planting of trees, and on the wider perspective of the village as a whole, from surrounding viewpoints.
  • British Royal Ancestry Book 6, Kings of England from King Alfred the Great to Present Time

    British Royal Ancestry Book 6, Kings of England from King Alfred the Great to Present Time

    GRANHOLM GENEALOGY BRITISH ROYAL ANCESTRY, BOOK 6 Kings of England INTRODUCTION The British ancestry is very much a patchwork of various beginnings. Until King Alfred the Great established England various Kings ruled separate parts. In most cases the initial ruler came from the mainland. That time of the history is shrouded in myths, which turn into legends and subsequent into history. Alfred the Great (849-901) was a very learned man and studied all available past history and especially biblical information. He came up with the concept that he was the 72nd generation descendant of Adam and Eve. Moreover he was a 17th generation descendant of Woden (Odin). Proponents of one theory claim that he was the descendant of Noah’s son Sem (Shem) because he claimed to descend from Sceaf, a marooned man who came to Britain on a boat after a flood. (See the Biblical Ancestry and Early Mythology Ancestry books). The book British Mythical Royal Ancestry from King Brutus shows the mythical kings including Shakespeare’s King Lair. The lineages are from a common ancestor, Priam King of Troy. His one daughter Troana leads to us via Sceaf, the descendants from his other daughter Creusa lead to the British linage. No attempt has been made to connect these rulers with the historical ones. Before Alfred the Great formed a unified England several Royal Houses ruled the various parts. Not all of them have any clear lineages to the present times, i.e. our ancestors, but some do. I have collected information which shows these. They include; British Royal Ancestry Book 1, Legendary Kings from Brutus of Troy to including King Leir.
  • Feudal Formulas in Love Lyrics of William Ix of Aquitaine

    Feudal Formulas in Love Lyrics of William Ix of Aquitaine

    Svetlana A. Yatsyk FEUDAL FORMULAS IN LOVE LYRICS OF WILLIAM IX OF AQUITAINE BASIC RESEARCH PROGRAM WORKING PAPERS SERIES: HUMANITIES WP BRP 74/HUM/2014 This Working Paper is an output of a research project presented at a workshop or conference at the National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE). Any opinions or claims contained in this Working Paper do not necessarily reflect the views of HSE Svetlana A. Yatsyk1 FEUDAL FORMULAS IN LOVE LYRICS OF WILLIAM IX OF AQUITAINE William, Ninth Duke of Aquitaine (1071-1127) was one of the most powerful feudal lords of his day. Probably inspired by the intricate verse forms he discovered in Arabic Spain and Syria, he seems to have created the first troubadour lyrics (in his own words, “a chansoneta nueva” (new song), “un vers ... totz mesclatz d'amor e de joy e de joven” (a verse ... all mixed with love and joy and youth)). The fact that he shared courtly values and behaved himself has never been called in question in historiography. The cornerstone problem of this research is as follows: how and for what reason did William apply the specific feudal formulas in his poetry. In his canzones one can face a number of turns which were then recorded by later troubadours and became a kind of clichés displaying the ceremonies practiced in the South French society and connected to the formation of feudal system, especially to relations between vassal and his lord. Keywords: William IX of Aquitaine, troubadour, feudalism, canzone, Old Provencal, versification JEL Classification: Z. 1 National Research University Higher School of Economics.
  • El Impacto De Las Relaciones Familiares Y Conyugales En Los Reinados De Las Reinas Titulares De Navarra (1274-1517)

    El Impacto De Las Relaciones Familiares Y Conyugales En Los Reinados De Las Reinas Titulares De Navarra (1274-1517)

    ANUARIO DE ESTUDIOS MEDIEVALES 46/1, enero-junio de 2016, pp. 167-201 ISSN 0066-5061 doi:10.3989/aem.2016.46.1.05 RULING & RELATIONSHIPS: THE FUNDAMENTAL BASIS OF THE EXERCISE OF POWER? THE IMPACT OF MARITAL & FAMILY RELATIONSHIPS ON THE REIGNS OF THE QUEENS REGNANT OF NAVARRE (1274-1517)1 PODER Y PARENTESCO: ¿LOS FUNDAMENTOS DE REINAR? EL IMPACTO DE LAS RELACIONES FAMILIARES Y CONYUGALES EN LOS REINADOS DE LAS REINAS TITULARES DE NAVARRA (1274-1517) ELENA WOODACRE University of Winchester Summary: Family relationships were the Resumen: Las relaciones familiares cons- foundation of dynastic monarchy and tituyeron el fundamento de la monarquía provided a crucial basis for the support dinástica y proporcionaron una base de of the rule of a reigning queen, who was apoyo crucial en el gobierno de una reina arguably in a far more vulnerable position con potestad propia, que se encontraba en than that of her male counterparts. This una posición mucho más vulnerable que article will examine the situation of the sus homólogos masculinos. Este artículo queens regnant of Navarre, between 1274 examinará la situación de las reinas titulares and 1517 with particular regard to their de Navarra entre 1274 y 1517, con especial relationship with their natal and marital énfasis en su relación con sus familias, tanto families. It will highlight various exam- de origen como política. Estudiaremos va- ples which demonstrate the key support rios ejemplos que ponen de manifi esto la that reigning queens received from their importancia de los apoyos que las reinas go- family members, which was especially bernadoras recibieron de los miembros de vital in times of crisis.