Minnesota Board of Pharmacy
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
3. 4 Ketamina E Analoghi
NEW DRUGS Nuove Sostanze Psicoattive 3. 4 Ketamina e analoghi 765 766 NEW DRUGS Nuove Sostanze Psicoattive Ketamina Nome Ketamina; (Ketamine) Struttura molecolare O NH CH3 Cl Formula di struttura C13H16ClNO Numero CAS 6740-88-1 (base libera) / 1867-66-9 (sale cloridrato) Nome IUPAC 2-(2-chlorophenyl)-2-(methylamino)cyclohexan-1-one Altri nomi (±)-2-(2-chlorophenyl)-2-methylamino)cyclohexanone; (±)-2-(o-chlorophenyl)-2-methylamino)cyclo hexanone; 2-(methylami- no)-2-(2-chlorophenyl)cyclohexanone; 2-(methylamino)-2-(o-chlorophenyl) cyclohexanone; (±)-Ketamine; CI-581; CL-369; CN- 52,372-2. Nomi commerciali (per uso umano o veterinario): Esketamie; Ketalar base; Ketamine Base; Ketavet; Ketolar; Vetalar Ketalar, Ketamine Panpharma, Ketanest-S; Ketalar, Ketaminol; Vetalar Vet., Ketaminol Vet.; Clorketam, Imalgene, Anesketin, Ketamine Ceva, Narketan, Ketaset, Anesketin. Nomi gergali: K, special K, kit kat, tac et tic, cat valium, vitamin K, ket, super K, Kaddy, Kate, Ket, Kéta K, Jet, Super acid, 1980 acid, Special LA coke, Super C, Purple, Mauve, Green. Peso molecolare 237.725 g/mol Aspetto Polvere/cristalli bianchi. Punto di fusione della ketamina base libera: 92-93 °C; del cloridrato: 262-263°C. Informazioni generali La ketamina è una arilcicloalchilamina strutturalmente correlata alle ciclidine quali ad esempio l’etilciclidina, la fenciclidina, la roliciclidina e la tenociclidina. La ketamina è una molecola di origine sintetica, sintetizzata nel 1962, brevettata in Belgio nel 1963. E’ stata progettata nell’ambito della ricerca di analoghi strutturali delle cicloesilamine a cui appartiene anche la fenciclidina (PCP). La ketamina ha proprietà anestetiche ed analgesiche. E’ ampiamente utilizzata in ambito veterinario, molto meno come anestetico nell’uomo. -
Moves to Amend HF No. 2711 As Follows
05/05/20 REVISOR KLL/JK A20-0767 1.1 .................... moves to amend H.F. No. 2711 as follows: 1.2 Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert: 1.3 "ARTICLE 1 1.4 APPROPRIATIONS 1.5 Section 1. APPROPRIATIONS. 1.6 The sums shown in the column under "APPROPRIATIONS" are added to or reduce the 1.7 appropriations in Laws 2019, First Special Session chapter 5, to the agencies and for the 1.8 purposes specified in this article. The appropriations are from the general fund, or another 1.9 named fund, and are available for the fiscal year indicated for each purpose. 1.10 APPROPRIATIONS 1.11 Available for the Year 1.12 Ending June 30 1.13 2020 2021 1.14 Sec. 2. CORRECTIONS 1.15 Subdivision 1. Total Appropriation $ 205,000 $ 5,545,000 1.16 The amounts that may be spent for each 1.17 purpose are specified in the following 1.18 subdivisions. 1.19 Subd. 2. Correctional Institutions -0- (2,545,000) 1.20 To account for overall bed impact savings of 1.21 reductions in the penalties for controlled 1.22 substances offenses involving the possession 1.23 of marijuana, investments in community 1.24 supervision, and increased penalties for sex 1.25 trafficking offenses, the fiscal year 2021 Article 1 Sec. 2. 1 05/05/20 REVISOR KLL/JK A20-0767 2.1 appropriation from Laws 2019, First Special 2.2 Session chapter 5, article 1, section 15, 2.3 subdivision 2, is reduced by $2,545,000. 2.4 Subd. -
Texas Controlled Substances Act
HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE TITLE 6. FOOD, DRUGS, ALCOHOL, AND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES SUBTITLE C. SUBSTANCE ABUSE REGULATION AND CRIMES CHAPTER 481. TEXAS CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ACT SUBCHAPTER A. GENERAL PROVISIONS Sec.A481.001.AASHORT TITLE. This chapter may be cited as the Texas Controlled Substances Act. Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 678, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1989. Sec.A481.002.AADEFINITIONS. In this chapter: (1)AA"Administer" means to directly apply a controlled substance by injection, inhalation, ingestion, or other means to the body of a patient or research subject by: (A)AAa practitioner or an agent of the practitioner in the presence of the practitioner; or (B)AAthe patient or research subject at the direction and in the presence of a practitioner. (2)AA"Agent" means an authorized person who acts on behalf of or at the direction of a manufacturer, distributor, or dispenser. The term does not include a common or contract carrier, public warehouseman, or employee of a carrier or warehouseman acting in the usual and lawful course of employment. (3)AA"Commissioner" means the commissioner of state health services or the commissioner 's designee. (4)AA"Controlled premises" means: (A)AAa place where original or other records or documents required under this chapter are kept or are required to be kept; or (B)AAa place, including a factory, warehouse, other establishment, or conveyance, where a person registered under this chapter may lawfully hold, manufacture, distribute, dispense, administer, possess, or otherwise dispose of a controlled substance or other item governed by the federal Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. -
Moves to Amend HF No. 2128 As Follows: Delete Everything After
04/05/21 10:32 am HOUSE RESEARCH RC/MV H2128DE1 1.1 .................... moves to amend H.F. No. 2128 as follows: 1.2 Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert: 1.3 "ARTICLE 1 1.4 DHS HEALTH CARE PROGRAMS 1.5 Section 1. [62A.002] APPLICABILITY OF CHAPTER. 1.6 Any benefit or coverage mandate included in this chapter does not apply to managed 1.7 care plans or county-based purchasing plans when the plan is providing coverage to state 1.8 public health care program enrollees under chapter 256B or 256L. 1.9 Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2020, section 62C.01, is amended by adding a subdivision to 1.10 read: 1.11 Subd. 4. Applicability. Any benefit or coverage mandate included in this chapter does 1.12 not apply to managed care plans or county-based purchasing plans when the plan is providing 1.13 coverage to state public health care program enrollees under chapter 256B or 256L. 1.14 Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2020, section 62D.01, is amended by adding a subdivision to 1.15 read: 1.16 Subd. 3. Applicability. Any benefit or coverage mandate included in this chapter does 1.17 not apply to managed care plans or county-based purchasing plans when the plan is providing 1.18 coverage to state public health care program enrollees under chapter 256B or 256L. 1.19 Sec. 4. [62J.011] APPLICABILITY OF CHAPTER. 1.20 Any benefit or coverage mandate included in this chapter does not apply to managed 1.21 care plans or county-based purchasing plans when the plan is providing coverage to state 1.22 public health care program enrollees under chapter 256B or 256L. Article 1 Sec. -
Designer Drugs: a Review
WORLD JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES Chavan et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences SJIF Impact Factor 5.210 Volume 4, Issue 08, 297-336. Review Article ISSN 2278 – 4357 DESIGNER DRUGS: A REVIEW Dr. Suyash Chavan,MBBS*1 and Dr. Vandana Roy2 1MD, Resident Doctor, Department of Pharmacology, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi. 2MD, PhD Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi. ABSTRACT Article Received on 25 May 2015, Designer drugs‟ are psychoactive substances that mimic the effects of Revised on 16 June 2015, other banned illicit drugs but evade detection by law enforcing Accepted on 07 July 2015 agencies. This is because of modifications in the structure of the original psychoactive molecule. Originally developed as a way to *Correspondence for evade existing drug laws in the late 1960s, the synthesis and use of Author designer drugs has increased dramatically. They are advertised with Dr. Suyash Chavan innocuous names and are sold mostly over the internet, discreet outlets MD, Resident Doctor, Department of and at entertainment clubs. Victims may exhibit symptoms similar to Pharmacology, Maulana the effects of the illegal drug that these synthetic drugs mimic, Azad Medical College, however, the exact culprit drug is not detected due to structural New Delhi. modifications in the new drug. Overdose of these drugs may lead to serious adverse effects that can be life threatening. Understanding the pharmacology and toxicology of these agents is essential to facilitate their detection and to provide better medical care for patients suffering from adverse effects due to their consumption. -
Model Scheduling New/Novel Psychoactive Substances Act (Third Edition)
Model Scheduling New/Novel Psychoactive Substances Act (Third Edition) July 1, 2019. This project was supported by Grant No. G1799ONDCP03A, awarded by the Office of National Drug Control Policy. Points of view or opinions in this document are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the Office of National Drug Control Policy or the United States Government. © 2019 NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR MODEL STATE DRUG LAWS. This document may be reproduced for non-commercial purposes with full attribution to the National Alliance for Model State Drug Laws. Please contact NAMSDL at [email protected] or (703) 229-4954 with any questions about the Model Language. This document is intended for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or opinion. Headquarters Office: NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR MODEL STATE DRUG 1 LAWS, 1335 North Front Street, First Floor, Harrisburg, PA, 17102-2629. Model Scheduling New/Novel Psychoactive Substances Act (Third Edition)1 Table of Contents 3 Policy Statement and Background 5 Highlights 6 Section I – Short Title 6 Section II – Purpose 6 Section III – Synthetic Cannabinoids 13 Section IV – Substituted Cathinones 19 Section V – Substituted Phenethylamines 23 Section VI – N-benzyl Phenethylamine Compounds 25 Section VII – Substituted Tryptamines 28 Section VIII – Substituted Phenylcyclohexylamines 30 Section IX – Fentanyl Derivatives 39 Section X – Unclassified NPS 43 Appendix 1 Second edition published in September 2018; first edition published in 2014. Content in red bold first added in third edition. © 2019 NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR MODEL STATE DRUG LAWS. This document may be reproduced for non-commercial purposes with full attribution to the National Alliance for Model State Drug Laws. -
Newer Unregulated Drugs Look-Up Table
Newer Unregulated Drugs Look-up Table List Name Chemical Name/AKA Type of drug Notes Stimulant Regulation under MDA (Sch. 1 or TCDO) Stimulant/Hallucinogen Regulation under MDA (Sch. 2-5) Hallucinogen Regulated by PSA Depressant Exempt Cannabinoid Uncertain/requires clarification 1P-LSD 1-propionyl-lysergic acid diethylamide Hallucinogen An LSD analogue that side-stepped MDA and was on sale as an NPS; now covered by the PSA. 2-AI 2-Aminoindane Stimulant, amphetamine analogue Reported in the UK in 2011 by the Forensic Early 2-MAI N-methyl-2-Aminoindane Warning System (FEWS). Had been on sale via number MMAI of online stores; covered by PSA. 2-MeO-ketamine Methoxyketamine Related to methoxetamine so a relative Believed to have been made a CD at the same time as Methoxieticyclidine of ketamine – i.e. a dissassociative Methoxetamine anaesthetic hallucinogen 2C-B-BZP (1-(4-bromo-2,5- Piperazine family; stimulant Class B dimethoxybenzyl)piperazine) 2-DPMP Desoxypipadrol stimulant Strong and long acting stimulant; reported duration of 2-diphenylmethylpiperidine effect 24-28hrs or more and effective at very low doses. Had been on sale in the UK and cropped up in branded “Ivory Wave” and in other compounds. Linked to fatalities. Class B, Sch1. 2-NE1 APICA Synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonist 3rd generation SCRA. Covered by PSA SDB-001 N-(1-adamantyl)-1-pentyl-1H-indole-3- carboxamide 3-FPM Phenzacaine Stimulant, euphoriants Sibling of the controlled drug Phenmetrazine. Emerged PAL-593 2015. Covered by PSA 2-(3-fluorophenyl)-3-methylmorpholine 3-hydroxyphenazepam Benzo, GABA-nergic PSA 3-MeO-PCE (3-methoxyeticyclidine) Related to methoxetamine so a relative Probably regulated under the same clause that made of ketamine – i.e. -
Appendix-2Final.Pdf 663.7 KB
North West ‘Through the Gate Substance Misuse Services’ Drug Testing Project Appendix 2 – Analytical methodologies Overview Urine samples were analysed using three methodologies. The first methodology (General Screen) was designed to cover a wide range of analytes (drugs) and was used for all analytes other than the synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists (SCRAs). The analyte coverage included a broad range of commonly prescribed drugs including over the counter medications, commonly misused drugs and metabolites of many of the compounds too. This approach provided a very powerful drug screening tool to investigate drug use/misuse before and whilst in prison. The second methodology (SCRA Screen) was specifically designed for SCRAs and targets only those compounds. This was a very sensitive methodology with a method capability of sub 100pg/ml for over 600 SCRAs and their metabolites. Both methodologies utilised full scan high resolution accurate mass LCMS technologies that allowed a non-targeted approach to data acquisition and the ability to retrospectively review data. The non-targeted approach to data acquisition effectively means that the analyte coverage of the data acquisition was unlimited. The only limiting factors were related to the chemical nature of the analyte being looked for. The analyte must extract in the sample preparation process; it must chromatograph and it must ionise under the conditions used by the mass spectrometer interface. The final limiting factor was presence in the data processing database. The subsequent study of negative MDT samples across the North West and London and the South East used a GCMS methodology for anabolic steroids in addition to the General and SCRA screens. -
Schifano, F., Napoletano, F., Chiappini, S., Orsolini, L., Guirguis, A., Corkery, J
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Hertfordshire Research Archive Citation for the published version: Schifano, F., Napoletano, F., Chiappini, S., Orsolini, L., Guirguis, A., Corkery, J. M., ... vento, A. (2019). New psychoactive substances (NPS), psychedelic experiences, and dissociation: clinical and clinical pharmacological issues. Current Addiction Reports, 6(2), 140-152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-019-00249-z Document Version: Accepted Version The final publication is available at Springer Nature via https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-019-00249-z © 2019 Springer Nature Publishing AG General rights Copyright© and Moral Rights for the publications made accessible on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Please check the manuscript for details of any other licences that may have been applied and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. You may not engage in further distribution of the material for any profitmaking activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute both the url (http://uhra.herts.ac.uk/) and the content of this paper for research or private study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, any such items will be temporarily removed from the repository pending investigation. -
Alcohol and Drug Abuse Subchapter 9
Chapter 8 – Alcohol and Drug Abuse Subchapter 9 Regulated Drug Rule 1.0 Authority This rule is established under the authority of 18 V.S.A. §§ 4201 and 4202 which authorizes the Vermont Board of Health to designate regulated drugs for the protection of public health and safety. 2.0 Purpose This rule designates drugs and other chemical substances that are illegal or judged to be potentially fatal or harmful for human consumption unless prescribed and dispensed by a professional licensed to prescribe or dispense them and used in accordance with the prescription. The rule restricts the possession of certain drugs above a specified quantity. The rule also establishes benchmark unlawful dosages for certain drugs to provide a baseline for use by prosecutors to seek enhanced penalties for possession of higher quantities of the drug in accordance with multipliers found at 18 V.S.A. § 4234. 3.0 Definitions 3.1 “Analog” means one of a group of chemical components similar in structure but different with respect to elemental composition. It can differ in one or more atoms, functional groups or substructures, which are replaced with other atoms, groups or substructures. 3.2 “Benchmark Unlawful Dosage” means the quantity of a drug commonly consumed over a twenty-four-hour period for any therapeutic purpose, as established by the manufacturer of the drug. Benchmark Unlawful dosage is not a medical or pharmacologic concept with any implication for medical practice. Instead, it is a legal concept established only for the purpose of calculating penalties for improper sale, possession, or dispensing of drugs pursuant to 18 V.S.A. -
G.S. 90-89 Page 1 § 90-89. Schedule I Controlled Substances. This
§ 90-89. Schedule I controlled substances. This schedule includes the controlled substances listed or to be listed by whatever official name, common or usual name, chemical name, or trade name designated. In determining that a substance comes within this schedule, the Commission shall find: a high potential for abuse, no currently accepted medical use in the United States, or a lack of accepted safety for use in treatment under medical supervision. The following controlled substances are included in this schedule: (1) Opiates. – Any of the following opiates or opioids, including the isomers, esters, ethers, salts and salts of isomers, esters, and ethers, unless specifically excepted, or listed in another schedule, whenever the existence of such isomers, esters, ethers, and salts is possible within the specific chemical designation: a. Acetyl-alpha-methylfentanyl (N[1-(1-methyl-2-phenethyl)-4-piperidinyl]-N-phenylacet amide). b. Acetylmethadol. c. Repealed by Session Laws 1987, c. 412, s. 2. d. Alpha-methylthiofentanyl (N-[1-methyl-2-(2-thienyl)ethyl/-4-piperidinyl]-N-phenylpro panamide). e. Allylprodine. f. Alphacetylmethadol (except levo-alphacetylmethadol, also known as levomethadyl acetate and LAAM). g. Alphameprodine. h. Alphamethadol. i. Alpha-methylfentanyl (N-(1-(alpha-methyl-beta-phenyl) ethyl-4-piperidyl) propionalilide; 1(1-methyl-2-phenyl-ethyl)-4-(N-propanilido) piperidine). j. Benzethidine. k. Betacetylmethadol. l. Beta-hydroxfentanyl (N-[1-(2-hydroxy-2-phenethyl)-4-piperidinyl]-N-phenylpropanamide ). m. Beta-hydroxy-3-methylfentanyl (N-[1-(2-hydroxy-2-phenethyl)-3-methyl-4-piperidinyl]-N-phenylpro panamide). n. Betameprodine. o. Betamethadol. p. Betaprodine. q. Clonitazene. r. Dextromoramide. s. Diampromide. t. Diethylthiambutene. u. -
Novel Psychoactive Substances and Analogues: 2017 Legislative Session Bill Status Update
Novel Psychoactive Substances and Analogues: 2017 Legislative Session Bill Status Update Research current through July 5, 2017. This project was supported by Grant No. G15599ONDCP03A, awarded by the Office of National Drug Control Policy. Points of view or opinions in this document are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the Office of National Drug Control Policy or the United States Government. © 2017 Research is current as of July 5, 2017. In order to ensure that the information contained herein is as current as possible, research is conducted using nationwide legal database software and individual state legislative websites. Please contact Jon Woodruff at (703) 836-6100, ext. 100 or [email protected] with any additional updates or information that may be relevant 1 to this document. This document is intended for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or opinion. Headquarters Office: THE NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR MODEL STATE DRUG LAWS, 100 ½ East Main Street, Suite C, Manchester IA 52057. Enacted Legislation and Adopted Regulations State and Bill Status and Date of Number Description Last Action U.S. Expresses the sense of the Senate that: 3/15/2017 – the use of illicit fentanyl in the United States and the resolution agreed to 2017 SRES 83 resulting overdose deaths are a public health crisis; in Senate without the trafficking of illicit fentanyl into the United States, amendment. especially by transnational criminal organizations, is a problem that requires close cooperation between the U.S. government and the governments of Mexico and China; and all three such countries have a shared interest in, and responsibility for, stopping the production of illicit fentanyl and its trafficking into the United States.