Federal Register/Vol. 73, No. 108/Wednesday, June 4

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 108 / Wednesday, June 4, 2008 / Proposed Rules 31785 Commander, Coast Guard Sector DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND comments and related materials. All Baltimore or any Coast Guard SECURITY comments received will be posted, commissioned, warrant, or petty officer without change, to http:// who has been authorized by the Captain Coast Guard www.regulations.gov and will include of the Port, Baltimore, Maryland to act any personal information you have on his or her behalf. 33 CFR Part 165 provided. We have an agreement with [Docket No. USCG–2008–0349] the Department of Transportation (DOT) (b) Location. The following area is a to use the Docket Management Facility. safety zone: All waters of the Upper RIN 1625–AA00 Please see DOT’s ‘‘Privacy Act’’ Potomac River, surface to bottom, paragraph below. within a 150-yard radius of the Safety Zones; Fireworks, Central and fireworks barge in approximate position Northern Massachusetts Submitting Comments ° ′ ″ If you submit a comment, please latitude 38 52 09 N, longitude AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 077°01′13″ W, located within the include the docket number for this ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. Washington Channel in Washington rulemaking (USCG–2008–0349), Harbor, DC. All coordinates reference SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes the indicate the specific section of this North American Datum 1983. temporary creation of safety zones for document to which each comment applies, and give the reason for each (c) Regulations: fireworks events being held on several waterways of Massachusetts this comment. We recommend that you (1) The general regulations governing summer. These safety zones will last for include your name and a mailing safety zones, found in Sec. 165.23, the limited duration of the six fireworks address, an e-mail address, or a phone apply to the safety zone described in events occurring near the water along number in the body of your document paragraph (b) of this section. the central and northern portions of so that we can contact you if we have (2) Entry into or remaining in this Massachusetts’ Atlantic Coast. The questions regarding your submission. zone is prohibited, unless authorized by zones are necessary to protect You may submit your comments and the Captain of the Port, Baltimore, spectators, participants, and vessels material by electronic means, mail, fax, or delivery to the Docket Management Maryland. from the hazards associated with fireworks displays. Facility at the address under ADDRESSES; (3) Persons or vessels requiring entry but please submit your comments and DATES: Comments and related material into or passage through the moving material by only one means. If you must reach the Coast Guard on or before safety zone must first request submit them by mail or delivery, submit July 7, 2008. authorization from the Captain of the them in an unbound format, no larger ADDRESSES: You may submit comments Port, Baltimore, Maryland to seek than 81⁄2 by 11 inches, suitable for permission to transit the area. The identified by Coast Guard docket copying and electronic filing. If you Captain of the Port, Baltimore, Maryland number USCG–2008–0349 to the Docket submit them by mail and would like to can be contacted at telephone number Management Facility at the U.S. know that they reached the Facility, Department of Transportation. To avoid (410) 576–2693. The Coast Guard please enclose a stamped, self-addressed duplication, please use only one of the vessels enforcing this section can be postcard or envelope. We will consider following methods: contacted on Marine Band Radio VHF all comments and material received (1) Online: http:// during the comment period. We may Channel 16 (156.8 MHz). Upon being www.regulations.gov. hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard vessel by change this proposed rule in view of (2) Mail: Docket Management Facility them. siren, radio, flashing light, or other (M–30), U.S. Department of means, the person or vessel shall Transportation, West Building Ground Viewing Comments and Documents proceed as directed. If permission is Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey To view comments, as well as granted, all persons or vessels must Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590– documents mentioned in this preamble comply with the instructions of the 0001. as being available in the docket, go to Captain of the Port, Baltimore, (3) Hand delivery: Room W12–140 on http://www.regulations.gov at any time. Maryland, and proceed at the minimum the Ground Floor of the West Building, Enter the docket number for this speed necessary to maintain a safe 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., rulemaking (USCG–2008–0349) in the course while within the zone. Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. Search box, and click ‘‘Go >>.’’ You may and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, (d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast also visit either the Docket Management except Federal holidays. The telephone Guard may be assisted in the patrol and Facility in Room W12–140 on the number is 202–366–9329. ground floor of the DOT West Building, enforcement of the zone by Federal, (4) Fax: 202–493–2251. State and local agencies. 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. (e) Enforcement periods. This section you have questions on this proposed and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, will be enforced from 8 p.m. through rule, call Chief Eldridge McFadden at except Federal holidays; or the U.S. 10:30 p.m. on July 16, 2008, and if 617–223–5160. If you have questions on Coast Guard Sector Boston, 427 necessary due to inclement weather, viewing or submitting material to the Commercial Street, Boston, MA 02109 from 8 p.m. through 10:30 p.m. on July docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program between 7 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday 17, 2008. Manager, Docket Operations, telephone through Friday, except Federal holidays. 202–366–9826. Dated: May 20, 2008. Privacy Act SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Brian D. Kelley, Anyone can search the electronic Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Public Participation and Request for form of all comments received into any Port, Baltimore, Maryland. Comments of our dockets by the name of the [FR Doc. E8–12475 Filed 6–3–08; 8:45 am] We encourage you to participate in individual submitting the comment (or BILLING CODE 4910–15–P this rulemaking by submitting signing the comment, if submitted on VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:40 Jun 03, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\04JNP1.SGM 04JNP1 rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS 31786 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 108 / Wednesday, June 4, 2008 / Proposed Rules behalf of an association, business, labor Port anticipates minimal negative Ipswich Bay, and Hingham Harbor at union, etc.). You may review the impact on vessel traffic due to this the times listed in the proposed rule. Department of Transportation’s Privacy event. Public notifications will be made These safety zones would not have a Act Statement in the Federal Register prior to the effective period via local significant economic impact on a published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR media, local notice to mariners and substantial number of small entities for 19477), or you may visit http:// marine information broadcasts. the following reasons: This proposed DocketsInfo.dot.gov. rule would be in effect for only two and Regulatory Evaluation one half hours, vessel traffic can safely Public Meeting We developed this proposed rule after pass around the safety zone during the We do not now plan to hold a public considering numerous statutes and effected period, and advance meeting, but you may submit a request executive orders related to rulemaking. notification via safety marine for one to the Docket Management Below we summarize our analysis based informational broadcast and Local Facility at the address under ADDRESSES on 13 of these statutes or executive Notice to Mariners will be made before explaining why one would be orders. and during the effective period. beneficial. If we determine that one If you think that your business, would aid this rulemaking, we will hold Executive Order 12866 organization, or governmental one at a time and place announced by This proposed rule is not a jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity a later notice in the Federal Register. ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under and that this rule would have a Background and Purpose section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, significant economic impact on it, Regulatory Planning and Review, and please submit a comment (see This rule proposes to establish six does not require an assessment of ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it individual safety zones on the waters of potential costs and benefits under qualifies and how and to what degree Nahant Bay, Manchester Bay, section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office this rule would economically affect it. Marblehead Harbor, Beverly Harbor, of Management and Budget has not Assistance for Small Entities Ipswich Bay, and Hingham Harbors reviewed it under that Order. during fireworks events on the nights We expect the economic impact of Under section 213(a) of the Small and times listed herein. this proposed rule to be so minimal that Business Regulatory Enforcement The safety zones proposed by this rule Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), would temporarily restrict movement a full Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary. Although this proposed we want to assist small entities in near fireworks displays being held in understanding this proposed rule so that Nahant Bay, Manchester Bay, rule would prevent traffic from transiting a portion of Nahant Bay, they can better evaluate its effects on Marblehead Harbor, Beverly Harbor, them and participate in the rulemaking.
Recommended publications
  • 2020 Coastal Massachusetts COASTSWEEP Results (People

    2020 Coastal Massachusetts COASTSWEEP Results (People

    COASTSWEEP 2020 - Cleanup Results Town Location Group Name People Pounds Miles TOTALS 703 9016.2 151.64 Arlington Mystic River near River Street 1 2 Arlington Mystic River 1 2.12 1.20 Barnstable Sandy Neck Beach Take Care Cape Cod 4 27.5 3.95 Barnstable Jublilation Way, Osterville 1 0.03 Barnstable Sandy Neck Beach Take Care Cape Cod 2 10.13 0.53 Barnstable Sandy Neck Beach Take Care Cape Cod 1 8 Barnstable Sandy Neck Beach Take Care Cape Cod 2 8.25 1.07 Barnstable Sandy Neck Beach Take Care Cape Cod 3 14.25 1.16 Barnstable Oregon Beach, Cotuit 6 30 Barnstable KalMus Park Beach 2 23.63 0.05 Barnstable Dowes Beach, East Bay Cape Cod Anti-Litter Coalition 4 25.03 0.29 Barnstable Osterville Point, Osterville Cape Cod Anti-Litter Coalition 1 3.78 0.09 Barnstable Louisburg Square, Centerville 2 Barnstable Hathaway's Ponds 2 4.1 0.52 Barnstable Hathaway's Ponds 2 5.37 0.52 Barnstable Eagle Pond, Cotuit Lily & Grace Walker 2 23.75 3.26 Beverly Corning Street SaleM Sound Coastwatch 2 0.02 Beverly Corning Street SaleM Sound Coastwatch 1 0.07 0.02 Beverly Corning Street SaleM Sound Coastwatch 1 0.03 0.02 Beverly Corning Street SaleM Sound Coastwatch 1 0.11 0.02 Beverly Corning Street SaleM Sound Coastwatch 1 0.18 0.01 Beverly Dane Street Beach SaleM Sound Coastwatch 1 0.36 0.04 Beverly Clifford Ave 2 11.46 0.03 Beverly Near David Lynch Park 1 0.43 0.03 Beverly Rice's Beach SaleM Sound Coastwatch 3 28.61 0.03 Beverly Rice's Beach SaleM Sound Coastwatch 3 1.61 Beverly Rice's Beach SaleM Sound Coastwatch 1 0.07 COASTSWEEP 2020 - Cleanup Results Town
  • Nahant Reconnaissance Report

    Nahant Reconnaissance Report

    NAHANT RECONNAISSANCE REPORT ESSEX COUNTY LANDSCAPE INVENTORY MASSACHUSETTS HERITAGE LANDSCAPE INVENTORY PROGRAM Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation Essex National Heritage Commission PROJECT TEAM Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation Jessica Rowcroft, Preservation Planner Division of Planning and Engineering Essex National Heritage Commission Bill Steelman, Director of Heritage Preservation Project Consultants Shary Page Berg Gretchen G. Schuler Virginia Adams, PAL Local Project Coordinator Linda Pivacek Local Heritage Landscape Participants Debbie Aliff John Benson Mark Cullinan Dan deStefano Priscilla Fitch Jonathan Gilman Tom LeBlanc Michael Manning Bill Pivacek Linda Pivacek Emily Potts Octavia Randolph Edith Richardson Calantha Sears Lynne Spencer Julie Stoller Robert Wilson Bernard Yadoff May 2005 INTRODUCTION Essex County is known for its unusually rich and varied landscapes, which are represented in each of its 34 municipalities. Heritage landscapes are those places that are created by human interaction with the natural environment. They are dynamic and evolving; they reflect the history of the community and provide a sense of place; they show the natural ecology that influenced the land use in a community; and heritage landscapes often have scenic qualities. This wealth of landscapes is central to each community’s character; yet heritage landscapes are vulnerable and ever changing. For this reason it is important to take the first steps toward their preservation by identifying those landscapes that are particularly valued by the community – a favorite local farm, a distinctive neighborhood or mill village, a unique natural feature, an inland river corridor or the rocky coast. To this end, the Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR) and the Essex National Heritage Commission (ENHC) have collaborated to bring the Heritage Landscape Inventory program (HLI) to communities in Essex County.
  • NEERS 2017 Spring Meeting March 16 – 18, 2017 University of Connecticut, Avery Point Campus Groton, CT

    NEERS 2017 Spring Meeting March 16 – 18, 2017 University of Connecticut, Avery Point Campus Groton, CT

    NEERS 2017 Spring Meeting March 16 – 18, 2017 University of Connecticut, Avery Point Campus Groton, CT Organized and Hosted By: Jamie Vaudrey, University of Connecticut Sarah Crosby, Harbor Watch Craig Tobias & Michael Whitney of UCONN ABSTRACTS Alldred*, M. (1), Hoellein, T. (2), Bruesewitz, D. (3), and Zarnoch, C. (1); (1) Baruch College, City University of New York, New York, NY; (2) Loyola University, Chicago, IL; (3) Colby College, Waterville, ME. [email protected] NITROGEN-REMOVAL SERVICES OF RESTORED SALT MARSHES IN JAMAICA BAY (NEW YORK, NY) Coastal wetlands are important sites of nitrogen removal, a critical ecosystem service in highly eutrophic environments. In Jamaica Bay, over 92% of historic wetland area has been lost over the past century. Despite considerable efforts to restore wetland ecosystems in Jamaica Bay and throughout New York City, few studies have examined the value of ecosystem services used to justify their cost, and little is known about the ecological mechanisms contributing to the success or failure of reconstruction. Past and ongoing restoration efforts in Jamaica Bay provide a unique opportunity to study nitrogen-removal ecosystem services in natural and restored wetlands in an urban, eutrophic environment. In collaboration with researchers from several institutions, we are using a chronosequence of marsh restorations to assess how marsh vegetation, sediment characteristics, and key processes of the nitrogen cycle develop over time following restoration. The goal of our project is to determine the restoration age and environmental conditions under which salt-marsh restoration will effectively provide ecosystem services such as nitrogen removal. We employ a combination of flow-through incubation, field survey, and experimental methods to identify the key biological and abiotic factors limiting nitrogen-removal services in natural and restored marshes.
  • Larson Fisher Associates, Inc

    Larson Fisher Associates, Inc

    Larson Fisher Associates, Inc. Historic Preservation and Planning Services P.O. Box 1394 Woodstock, N.Y. 12498 845-679-5054 www.larsonfisher.com COASTAL ZONE HISTORIC RESOURCE SURVEY Marblehead, Essex County, Massachusetts Final Report 18 September 2016 Abstract The project conducted an intensive-level survey of historic resources within the coastal zone established by the Town of Marblehead. This project was the top priority in the Town’s Historic Resource Survey Master Plan (2013) as historic properties on the coastline are considered to be most vulnerable to change. The goal of the survey is to promote the preservation of these valuable properties by raising public awareness of their significance through detailed and cogent narratives of their individual histories and their role as landmarks in the evolving physical and cultural character of their neighborhoods. In addition, the local Marblehead Historical Commission (LHC) desired to upgrade existing levels of documentation and provide information useful in the evaluation of significance for preservation planning and the town’s review of permit applications involving historic properties. The LHC has no direct jurisdiction in project review but hopes survey documentation will lead to informed decisions where significant historic resources are involved. This project recorded architectural, historical and photographic documentation for 186 properties in the coastal zone on survey forms for individual properties and areas provided by the Massachusetts Historical Commission (MHC). Individual properties and historic districts that appear eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places have been identified. Due to the large number of properties documented, exceeding the contractual obligation of 120 properties, those on Marblehead Neck were deferred to a later project with one exception.
  • Massachusetts Ocean Management Plan

    Massachusetts Ocean Management Plan

    Massachusetts Ocean Management Plan Volume 2 Baseline Assessment and Science Framework December 2009 Introduction Volume 2 of the Massachusetts Ocean Management Plan focuses on the data and scientific aspects of the plan and its implementation. It includes these two separate documents: • Baseline Assessment of the Massachusetts Ocean Planning Area - This Oceans Act-mandated product includes information cataloging the current state of knowledge regarding human uses, natural resources, and other ecosystem factors in Massachusetts ocean waters. • Science Framework - This document provides a blueprint for ocean management- related science and research needs in Massachusetts, including priorities for the next five years. i Baseline Assessment of the Massachusetts Ocean Management Planning Area Acknowledgements The authors thank Emily Chambliss and Dan Sampson for their help in preparing Geographic Information System (GIS) data for presentation in the figures. We also thank Anne Donovan and Arden Miller, who helped with the editing and layout of this document. Special thanks go to Walter Barnhardt, Ed Bell, Michael Bothner, Erin Burke, Tay Evans, Deb Hadden, Dave Janik, Matt Liebman, Victor Mastone, Adrienne Pappal, Mark Rousseau, Tom Shields, Jan Smith, Page Valentine, John Weber, and Brad Wellock, who helped us write specific sections of this assessment. We are grateful to Wendy Leo, Peter Ralston, and Andrea Rex of the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority for data and assistance writing the water quality subchapter. Robert Buchsbaum, Becky Harris, Simon Perkins, and Wayne Petersen from Massachusetts Audubon provided expert advice on the avifauna subchapter. Kevin Brander, David Burns, and Kathleen Keohane from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection and Robin Pearlman from the U.S.
  • Northeast Region Bacteria Source Tracking 2007 Results

    Northeast Region Bacteria Source Tracking 2007 Results

    DRAFT Technical Memorandum Northeast Region Bacteria Source Tracking 2007 Results DWM Control Number: CN XXX.X Prepared By: Jenny Birnbaum Katie Zink January 2008 Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Ian A. Bowles, Secretary Massachusetts Department Of Environmental Protection Laurie Burt, Commissioner Bureau of Resource Protection Glenn Haas, Acting Assistant Commissioner Division of Watershed Management Glenn Haas, Director Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................... 6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS................................................................................................................... 9 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 10 2.0 METHODS................................................................................................................................12 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTIONS, RESULTS, AND SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS ............................................... 13 3.1 Boston Harbor - Mystic..........................................................................................................................13 Mill Brook (Arlington) ......................................................................................................... 13 Sub-watershed Description ............................................................................................... 13 Results..............................................................................................................................
  • Marblehead Reconnaissance Report

    Marblehead Reconnaissance Report

    MARBLEHEAD RECONNAISSANCE REPORT ESSEX COUNTY LANDSCAPE INVENTORY MASSACHUSETTS HERITAGE LANDSCAPE INVENTORY PROGRAM Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation Essex National Heritage Commission PROJECT TEAM Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation Jessica Rowcroft, Preservation Planner Division of Planning and Engineering Essex National Heritage Commission Bill Steelman, Director of Heritage Preservation Project Consultants Shary Page Berg Gretchen G. Schuler Virginia Adams, PAL Local Project Coordinator Rebecca Curran, Town Planner Local Heritage Landscape Participants Wayne Butler Rebecca Curran Bill Conly Charlie Dalferro Joseph Homan Bette Hunt Judy Jacobi John Liming Frank McIver Ed Nilsson Miller Shropshire William Woodfin May 2005 INTRODUCTION Essex County is known for its unusually rich and varied landscapes, which are represented in each of its 34 municipalities. Heritage landscapes are places that are created by human interaction with the natural environment. They are dynamic and evolving; they reflect the history of the community and provide a sense of place; they show the natural ecology that influenced land use patterns; and they often have scenic qualities. This wealth of landscapes is central to each community’s character; yet heritage landscapes are vulnerable and ever changing. For this reason it is important to take the first steps towards their preservation by identifying those landscapes that are particularly valued by the community – a favorite local farm, a distinctive neighborhood or mill village, a unique natural feature, an inland river corridor or the rocky coast. To this end, the Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR) and the Essex National Heritage Commission (ENHC) have collaborated to bring the Heritage Landscape Inventory program (HLI) to communities in Essex County.
  • Mystic River Watershed with Myrwa

    Mystic River Watershed with Myrwa

    Silver Lake DANVERS Crane River Ipswich River Crystal Lake Elginwood Pond Waters River 95 38 Devils Dishfull Pond Patches Pond Winona Pond PEABODY LYNNFIELD Puritan Lawn Pond WILMINGTON Pierces Pond 128 Pillings Pond 28 Suntaug Lake Colonial GC Ponds Cedar Pond Proctor Pond Goldthwait Brook Baltic Pond READING Stoneys Pond Lake Q uannapow itt Phillips Pond Bartholomew Pond Spring Pond Mill Pond Reservoir Mishawum Lake Hawkes Brook Pond Browns Pond BURLINGTON Hawkes Pond Cedar Pond SALEM 95 Spring Pond Lily Mere Pond WAKEFIELD Wa lde n Pond Sluice Pond Crystal Lake ABR049 Pearce Lake Camo Nihan Pond Floating Bridge Pond Silver Lake Flax Pond WOBURN Whittemore Pond Spring Pond Breeds Pond LYNN Birch Pond Griswold Pond Prankers Pond 93 STONEHAM Buckman Pond SAUGUS Doleful Pond Butterfields Pond Horn Pond Stevens Pond ABR028 Shute Pond North Reservoir Ell Pond Saugus River Dark Hollow Pond Long Pond Aberjona River Spot Pond Middle Reservoir Winter Pond MELROSE Long Pond Judkins Pond 2nd Pond 1st Pond 3rd Pond Wedge Pond Towners Pond L y n n H a r b o r Bear Creek WINCHESTER Swains Pond Quarter Mile Pond Fells Reservoir Nahant Bay ABR006 South Reservoir Wrights Pond Pines River Pines River LEXINGTON Upper Pines Pond Mystic Lake Diamond Creek Brooks Pond MALDEN UPL001 38 Fellsmere Pond Pines River 2A NAHANT Arlington Reservoir Lower Mystic Lake MEDFORD MIB001 REVERE MYR071 MAR036 Broad Sound ARLINGTON MEB001 60 2 1 Malden River Spy Pond EVERETT MIC004 3 ALB006 Mill Creek Chelsea River Little Pond 28 Mystic River WIB001 Alew ife Brook CHELSEA
  • CPB1 C10 WEB.Pdf

    CPB1 C10 WEB.Pdf

    338 ¢ U.S. Coast Pilot 1, Chapter 10 Chapter 1, Pilot Coast U.S. 70°45'W 70°30'W 70°15'W 71°W Chart Coverage in Coast Pilot 1—Chapter 10 NOAA’s Online Interactive Chart Catalog has complete chart coverage http://www.charts.noaa.gov/InteractiveCatalog/nrnc.shtml 71°W 13279 Cape Ann 42°40'N 13281 MASSACHUSETTS Gloucester 13267 R O B R A 13275 H Beverly R Manchester E T S E C SALEM SOUND U O Salem L G 42°30'N 13276 Lynn NORTH ATLANTIC OCEAN Boston MASSACHUSETTS BAY 42°20'N 13272 BOSTON HARBOR 26 SEP2021 13270 26 SEP 2021 U.S. Coast Pilot 1, Chapter 10 ¢ 339 Cape Ann to Boston Harbor, Massachusetts (1) This chapter describes the Massachusetts coast along and 234 miles from New York. The entrance is marked on the northwestern shore of Massachusetts Bay from Cape its eastern side by Eastern Point Light. There is an outer Ann southwestward to but not including Boston Harbor. and inner harbor, the former having depths generally of The harbors of Gloucester, Manchester, Beverly, Salem, 18 to 52 feet and the latter, depths of 15 to 24 feet. Marblehead, Swampscott and Lynn are discussed as are (11) Gloucester Inner Harbor limits begin at a line most of the islands and dangers off the entrances to these between Black Rock Danger Daybeacon and Fort Point. harbors. (12) Gloucester is a city of great historical interest, the (2) first permanent settlement having been established in COLREGS Demarcation Lines 1623. The city limits cover the greater part of Cape Ann (3) The lines established for this part of the coast are and part of the mainland as far west as Magnolia Harbor.
  • Coast Guard, DHS § 110.30

    Coast Guard, DHS § 110.30

    Coast Guard, DHS § 110.30 § 110.26 Marblehead Harbor, Marble- from a point on the Tobin Bridge at head, Mass. latitude 42°23′08.5″ N. 071°02′48.2″ W. to a ° ′ ″ The area comprises that portion of point at latitude 42 23 06.4 N. ° ′ ″ the harbor lying between the extreme 071 02 43.7 W.; thence northwest to a ° ′ ″ low water line and southwestward of a point at latitude 42 23 09.1 N. ° ′ ″ line bearing 336° from Marblehead Neck 071 02 43.2 W. along the shoreline to Light to a point on Peach Point at lati- the western side of Tobin Bridge, tude 42°31′03″, longitude 70°50′30″. thence to the point of origin. (c) Mystic River, west side of Tobin NOTE: The area is principally for use by Bridge. Beginning at a line running yachts and other recreational craft. Tem- from a point on the Tobin Bridge at porary floats or buoys for marking anchors ° ′ ″ ° ′ ″ are allowed. Fixed mooring piles or stakes latitude 42 23 08.8 N. 071 02 48.6 W. to a are prohibited. All moorings shall be so that point at latitude 42°23′10.5″ N. 071°05′52″ no vessel, when anchored, shall at any time W.; thence northwest to the southeast- extend beyond the limits of the area. The an- erly corner of the pier at latitude choring of vessels and the placing of tem- 42°23′13.4″ N. 071°02′57.1″ W. along the porary moorings are under the jurisdiction pier to the shoreline to the eastern side and at the direction of the local of Tobin Bridge, thence to the point of harbormaster.
  • Boston Basin Restudied

    Boston Basin Restudied

    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository New England Intercollegiate Geological NEIGC Trips Excursion Collection 1-1-1984 Boston Basin restudied Kaye, Clifford A. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/neigc_trips Recommended Citation Kaye, Clifford A., "Boston Basin restudied" (1984). NEIGC Trips. 348. https://scholars.unh.edu/neigc_trips/348 This Text is brought to you for free and open access by the New England Intercollegiate Geological Excursion Collection at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in NEIGC Trips by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. B2-1 124 BOSTON BASIN RESTUDIED Clifford A. Kaye U.S. Geological Survey (retired) 150 Causeway Street, Suite 1001 Boston, MA 02114 Abstract Recent mapping of the Boston Basin has shown that the sedimentary and rhyolitic and andesitic volcanic rocks are interbedded and that all lithic types interfinger, reflecting a wide range of depositional environments, including: alluvial, fluviatile, lacustrine, lagoonal, and marine-shelf. In addition to the well-known sedimentary rocks, such as argillite and conglomerate, we now recognize calcareous argillites, gypsiferous argillites of hypersaline origin, black argillite, red beds, turbidity current deposits, and alluvial fan deposits. The depositional setting seems to have been a tectonically active, block-faulted terrane in a coastal area. The granites that underlie these rocks are approximately the same age, some of them intruding the lower part of the sedimentary and volcanic section and feeding the rhyolitic Volcanics within the section. All of this took place in Late Proterozoic Z-Cambrian time.
  • AUGUST 2007 • Page 1 Nahant Harbor Review

    AUGUST 2007 • Page 1 Nahant Harbor Review

    NAHANT HARBOR REVIEW • AUGUST 2007 • Page 1 Nahant Harbor Review A monthly publication, in service since March 1994, dedicated to strengthening the spirit of community by serving the interests of civic, religious and business organizations of Nahant, Massachusetts, USA. Volume 14 Issue 8 AUGUST 2007 Nahanter Rachel Tarmy Celebrate 25 Years with My Brother’s Competes for Miss Teen Boston Table at Summer Garden Party Aug. 9th Rachel Tarmy of Nahant, daughter of Les and Julie Tarmy, was recently selected, to participate in The Summer Garden Party, a critical fund-raiser to benefit the North Shore’s largest Nationals’ 2007 Miss Teen Boston pageant competi- soup kitchen, My Brother’s Table, in Lynn, will take place on August 9th, at Marian tion, that will take place on July 29th, 2007. Rachel Court College, Little’s Point Road, in learned of her acceptance into this year’s competition, Swampscott, beginning at 7:00 p.m. as Nationals, Inc. Tickets start at $65. This vital event announced their includes the auction of an Italian Villa selections on Vacation, from the Parker Company, as Monday, July 2nd. well as a catered event for 50, from Rachel submitted Tiger Lily Caterers of Beverly. Please an application and RSVP Mary at 781-595-3224. took part in an This year, My Brother’s Table is interview session, celebrating 25 years of operation; it has that was con- served over two million meals to the ducted by Patty hungry, since 1982. Last year, over Niedert, this year’s 80,000 meals were served to those in Boston Pageant need.