DOCSLIB.ORG

IUCN Evaluation of Nominations of Natural and Mixed Properties to the World Heritage List

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
IUCN Evaluation of Nominations of Natural and Mixed Properties to the World Heritage List WHC-04/28.COM/INF.14B Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage IUCN Evaluation of Nominations of Natural and Mixed Properties to the World Heritage List Report to the World Heritage Committee Twenty-eighth session 28 June – 7 July 2004 – Suzhou, China Prepared by IUCN – The World Conservation Union April 2004 Table of Contents Introduction IUCN Technical Evaluation Reports A.1 Natural Properties ID No Page Arab States Hawar Islands - Bahrain N 1126 1 Asia Pacific Tropical Rainforest Heritage of Sumatra – Indonesia N 1167 9 Europe / North America Rock Cities of the Bohemian Paradise - Czech Republic N 1129 25 Ilulissat Icefjord – Denmark N 1149 37 Ilhas Selvagens – Portugal N 1151 45 Primeval Forests of Slovakia – Slovakia N 1133 55 Latin America /Caribbean Corcovado National Park and Isla del Caño Biological Reserve – N 1128 65 Costa Rica Coiba National Park – Panama N 1138 73 Pitons Management Area – Saint Lucia N 1161 81 A2 Deferred Nominations for which additional information has been received Africa The Cape Floral Region of South Africa – South Africa N 1007 Rev 95 Europe / North America Palaeohabitat of Tarnóc – Hungary N 667 Rev 107 Natural System of "Wrangel Island" Reserve - Russian N 1023 Rev 115 Federation A3 Extension of properties inscribed on the World Heritage List Europe / North America Western Caucasus (Extension to include the Teberdinskiy N 900 Bis 127 Reserve) - Russian Federation Gough Island Wildlife Reserve (extension to include N 740 Bis 137 Inaccessible Island) - United Kingdom Latin America / Caribbean Area de Conservación Guancaste (Extension to include the N 928 Bis 143 Sector Santa Elena) - Costa Rica ID No Page B. Mixed Properties B.1 New nominations Latin America / Caribbean Cajas Lakes and Ruins of Paredones – Ecuador N/C 1124 147 B.2 Extensions of properties inscribed on the World Heritage List to include additional Natural Criteria Europe / North America St. Kilda (Hirta) renomination to include cultural criteria and extension to N/C 387 Bis 155 include marine area - United Kingdom C. Cultural Properties Europe / North America The Madriu-Perafita-Claror Valley - Andorra C1160 165 Þingvellir National Park – Iceland C1152 173 Vegaøyan –The Vega Archipelago – Norway C1143 181 Numerical Index of IUCN Evaluations of properties to be examined by the World Heritage Committee at its 28th Session ID Number State Party World Heritage Property Proposed Page N/C 387 Bis United Kingdom St Kilda (Hirta) ¨155 N 667 Rev Hungary Palaeohabitat of Tarnóc 107 N 740 Bis United Kingdom Gough Island Wildlife Reserve 137 N 900 Bis Russian Federation Western Caucasus 127 N 928 Bis Costa Rica Area de Conservación Guancaste 143 N 1007 Rev South Africa Cape Floral Region of South Africa 95 N 1023 Rev Russian Federation Natural System of "Wrangel Island" 115 Reserve N/C 1124 Ecuador Cajas Lakes and the Ruins of Paredones 147 N 1126 Kingdom of Bahrain Hawar Islands 1 N 1128 Costa Rica Corcovado National Park and Isla del 65 Caňo Biological Reserve N 1129 Czech Republic Rock Cities of the Bohemian Paradise 25 N 1133 Slovakia Primeval Forests of Slovakia 55 N 1138 Panama Coiba National Park 73 C 1143 Norway Vegaøyan – The Vega Archipelago 181 N 1149 Denmark Ilulissat Icefjord 37 N 1151 Portugal Selvagens Islands 45 C 1152 Iceland Pingvellir National Park 173 C 1160 Andorra The Madriu-Perafita-Claror Valley 165 N 1161 Saint Lucia Pitons Management Area 81 N 1167 Indonesia Tropical Rainforest Heritage of Sumatra 9 THE WORLD HERITAGE CONVENTION IUCN TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORTS April 2004 1. INTRODUCTION This technical evaluation report of natural sites nominated for inclusion on the World Heritage List has been conducted by the Programme on Protected Areas (PPA) of IUCN – The World Conservation Union. PPA co-ordinates IUCN's input to the World Heritage Convention. It also co-ordinates activities of IUCN’s World Commission on Protected Areas (WCPA) which is the world's leading expert network of protected area managers and specialists. In carrying out its function under the World Heritage Convention IUCN has been guided by four principles: (i) the need to ensure the highest standards of quality control and institutional memory in relation to technical evaluation, monitoring and other associated activities; (ii) the need to increase the use of specialist networks of IUCN, especially WCPA, but also other relevant IUCN Commissions and specialist networks; (iii) the need to work in support of the UNESCO World Heritage Centre and States Parties to examine how IUCN can creatively and effectively support the World Heritage Convention and individual sites as “flagships” for biodiversity conservation; and (iv) the need to increase the level of effective partnership between IUCN and the World Heritage Centre, ICOMOS and ICCROM. Members of the expert network of WCPA carry out the majority of technical evaluation missions. This allows for the involvement of regional natural heritage experts and broadens the capacity of IUCN with regard to its work under the World Heritage Convention. Reports from field missions and comments from a large number of international reviewers are comprehensively examined by the IUCN World Heritage Panel. PPA then prepares the final technical evaluation reports which are outlined in this document. IUCN has also placed emphasis on providing input and support to ICOMOS in relation to cultural landscapes and other cultural nominations which have important natural values. IUCN recognises that nature and culture are strongly linked and that many natural World Heritage sites have important cultural values. The WCPA membership network now totals over 1400 protected area managers and specialists from 120 countries. This network has provided much of the basis for conducting the IUCN technical evaluations. In addition, the Protected Areas Programme has been able to call on experts from IUCN's other five Commissions (Species Survival, Environmental Law, Education and Communication, Ecosystem Management, and Environmental, Economic and Social Policy), from other specialist offices in the IUCN Secretariat, and from scientific contacts in universities and other international agencies. This highlights the considerable “added value” from investing in the use of the extensive networks of IUCN and partner institutions. 2. FORMAT Each technical evaluation report presents a concise summary of the nomination, a comparison with other similar sites, a review of management and integrity issues and concludes with the assessment of the applicability of the criteria, and a clear recommendation to the World Heritage Committee. i Standardised data sheets, prepared for each nomination by UNEP - World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC), are available in a separate document. 3. SITES REVIEWED 28 site files were reviewed by IUCN in the 2003/2004 period, involving 17 field inspections. These comprised: •= 17 natural site nominations (including 3 extensions and 1 deferred site where additional information had been received), •= 2 mixed site nominations and •= 9 cultural landscapes. Joint missions were carried out with ICOMOS for 1 mixed site nomination. Joint missions were also carried out with ICOMOS to 3 cultural landscapes and the reports for these sites are included in this document. IUCN reviewed an additional 6 cultural landscape nominations and provided comments directly to ICOMOS where relevant to assist them in their evaluation process. A number of general observations can be made from the nominations evaluated in this session: i) A large number of weak and poorly prepared nominations have been received; ii) A large majority of the nominations have very poor comparative analyses. IUCN reminds the Committee and States Parties that all nominations should include a thorough global comparative analysis that justifies the claim for outstanding universal value; iii) The majority of nominated sites evaluated by IUCN came from the European region; and iv) An increasing number of sites could potentially be part of larger serial nominations on a more regional scale, emphasizing the need for regionally harmonized tentative lists. At a recent meeting of the Advisory Bodies and the World Heritage Centre, it was recommended that the World Heritage Centre needs to be stricter when assessing the completeness of nominations submitted. The files reviewed by IUCN in 2003/2004 are as follows: ID Number State Party World Heritage property proposed A. Nominations of natural properties to the World Heritage List A1. New Nominations 1089 Austria Hohe Tauern National Park (core zone) Carinthia, Salzburg, Tyrol (withdrawn by State Party – no evaluation report presented) 1126 Bahrain Hawar Islands 1128 Costa Rica Corcovado National Park and Isla del Caño Biological Reserve 1129 Czech Republic Rock Cities of the Bohemian Paradise 1149 Denmark Ilulissat Icefjord 1167 Indonesia Tropical Rainforest Heritage of Sumatra 1138 Panama Coiba National Park 1151 Portugal Ilhas Selvagens 1161 Saint Lucia Pitons Management Area 1133 Slovakia Primeval Forests of Slovakia A2. Deferred nominations for which additional information has been received 667 Rev Hungary Palaeohabitat of Tarnóc 1060 Rev Kenya Rift Valley Lakes Reserve (information insufficient to report to Committee at this time) 1023 Russian Natural System of "Wrangel Island" Reserve Federation 1007 Rev South Africa Cape Floral Region of South Africa ii ID Number State Party World Heritage property proposed A3. Extension of properties inscribed on the World Heritage
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Analysing Data on Protected Areas Work in Progress
    The OECD is developing a method to report a more detailed and harmonised account of countries’ terrestrial and marine protected areas. It applies a harmonised methodology to data from the World Database on Protected Areas. Analysing data on protected areas WORK IN PROGRESS CONTACT Head of Division Nathalie Girouard [email protected] Senior Economist Ivan Haščič [email protected] Statisticians Alexander Mackie [email protected] and Sarah Sentier [email protected] Communications Clara Tomasini [email protected] Image credits: Dormitor Park by Thomas Maluck, Flickr/CC licence. UNSDG. Perereca de folhagem Moisés Silva Lima Flickr/CC Licence. Icon TheNounProject.com http://oe.cd/env-data 2 December 2016 International goals Methodology THE WORLD DATABASE ON PROTECTED AREAS The OECD is developing an improved method to The OECD’s indicators are based on data Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) generate more detailed indicators on protected from the World Database on Protected Areas and its World Commission on Protected areas, both terrestrial and marine, for countries (WDPA), which is a geospatial database of Areas (WCPA). across the world. terrestrial and marine protected areas. The WDPA is updated monthly. It contains The WDPA is managed by the United information on more than 200 000 It applies a harmonised methodology to data Nations Environment Programme’s World protected areas. from the World Database on Protected Areas. Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP- WCMC) with support from the International CATEGORIES OF MANAGEMENT By 2020, conserve at least 10 per cent of coastal and The World Database on Protected Areas lists z Ia Strict Nature Reserve marine areas, consistent with national and international protected areas designated at national (IUCN z Ib Wilderness Area law and based on best available scientific information.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Significance of Intact Forest Landscapes in The
    Landscape Ecol (2020) 35:2113–2131 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-020-01088-4 (0123456789().,-volV)( 0123456789().,-volV) RESEARCH ARTICLE Conservation significance of intact forest landscapes in the Scandinavian Mountains Green Belt Johan Svensson . Jakub W. Bubnicki . Bengt Gunnar Jonsson . Jon Andersson . Grzegorz Mikusin´ski Received: 6 July 2019 / Accepted: 1 August 2020 / Published online: 10 August 2020 Ó The Author(s) 2020 Abstract Methods Over 22 million ha with 14.5 million ha Context As forest harvesting remains high, there is a boreal and subalpine forest and with data consisting of crucial need to assess the remaining large, contiguous a 60-70 year retrospective sequence, we analyzed and intact forests, regionally, nationally and globally. distribution, density and connectivity of forests that Objectives Our objective was to analyze the spatial have not been clear cut, using moving window and patterns and structural connectivity of intact and landscape analyzes derived from Circuitscape. primary forests in northern Sweden with focus on Results We revealed a contiguous, connected and the Scandinavian Mountain region; one of the few semi-connected intact forest landscape forming a remaining large European intact forest landscapes. distinct Green Belt south to north along the mountain range. Almost 60% of the forestland remains intact, including contiguous clusters 10,000 ha and larger. The connectivity is particularly high in protected areas Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-020-01088-4) con- with primary forests outside contributing substantially tains supplementary material, which is available to authorized to overall connectivity. We found gaps in connectivity users.
    [Show full text]
  • Society for Spanish and Portuguese Historical Studies Organization
    Society for Spanish and Portuguese Historical Studies Founded in1969 to promote research in all aspects and epochs of Iberian history, the Society for Spanish and Portuguese Historical Studies conducts annual meetings, provides a forum for scholars of Iberian Affairs, and publishes this Bulletin each spring and fall. Annual Membership Dues Students $7.00 U.S. Members $20.00 Overseas Members $23.00 Institutions $25.00 All information concerning membership should be addressed to the Membership Secretary: Andrew Lee, 310 First Street, Westfield, NJ 07090 <[email protected]>. ORGANIZATION OFFICERS Ida Altman (2008) GENERAL SECRETARY Department of History University of Florida Jodi Bilinkoff (2008) Margaret Greer (2009) EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE University of North Carolina, Greensboro Duke University Maria Antonia Carmona Ruiz (2008) Sandie Holguin (2009) Universidad de Sevilla University of Oklahoma Lu Ann Homza (2008) Rita Costa Gomes (2008) College of William and Mary Towson University Editor of the Bulletin Membership Secretary (Ex officio) (Ex officio) Daniel A. Crews Andrew Lee University of Central Missouri New York University Web Editors (Ex officio) James D'Emilio University of South Florida Ana Varela University of California, San Diego James Tueller (2009) Rowena Hernández-Múzquiz (2008) NOMINATING Brigham Young University Hawaii Ohio Wesleyan University COMMITTEE Michael Levine (2010) University of Akron 1 The SSPHS Bulletin GENERAL EDITOR Daniel A. Crews Department of History and Anthropology University of Central Missouri Book Review Editors Spanish History Portuguese History Marta Vicente, Rita Costa Gomes, History Department History Department University of Kansas Towson University Ruth MacKay, San Francisco, CA Production Editors Print Copy Electronic Copy Constance Mathers, Holly Davenport, Ashland, VA Coordinator Technical Projects University of Central Missouri The SSPHS Bulletin is published two times each year and is distributed to the members of the Society.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Early Paleozoic Platforms of Baltica and Laurentia to the Caledonide Orogen of Scandinavia and Greenland
    44 by David G. Gee1, Haakon Fossen2, Niels Henriksen3, and Anthony K. Higgins3 From the Early Paleozoic Platforms of Baltica and Laurentia to the Caledonide Orogen of Scandinavia and Greenland 1 Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Villavagen Villavägen 16, Uppsala, SE-752 36, Sweden. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Earth Science, University of Bergen, Allégaten 41, N-5007, Bergen, Norway. E-mail: [email protected] 3 The Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland, Øster Voldgade 10, Dk 1350 Copenhagen, Denmark. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] The Caledonide Orogen in the Nordic countries is exposed in Norway, western Sweden, westernmost Fin- Introduction land, on Svalbard and in northeast Greenland. In the The Caledonide Orogen is preserved on both sides of the North mountains of western Scandinavia, the structure is dom- Atlantic Ocean, in the mountains of western Scandinavia and north- inated by E-vergent thrusts with allochthons derived eastern Greenland; it continues northwards from northern Norway, across the Barents Shelf and Svalbard to the edge of the Eurasian from the Baltoscandian platform and margin, from out- Basin (Figure 1). The orogen is notable for its thrust systems, board oceanic (Iapetus) terranes and with the highest E-vergent in Scandinavia and W-vergent in Greenland. The width of the orogen, prior to Cenozoic opening of the North Atlantic, was in thrust sheets having Laurentian affinities. The other the order of at least 700–800 km, the deformation fronts on both side of this bivergent orogen is well exposed in north- sides of the orogen being defined by thrusts that, in the Devonian, eastern Greenland, where W-vergent thrust sheets probably reached substantially further onto the foreland platforms than they do today.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 1, Issue 1  Spring 2017 Partner Profiles Tropical Wings
    Membership Tropical Wings is a non-profit 501c3 organization composed of volunteers supporting education and conservation for Neotropical Migratory birds through the Sister Parks Agreement between National Parks Tropical in the Upper Midwest and Costa Rica’s Osa Peninsula. Join our efforts today by making a contribution and becoming a Tropical Wings Member! Contribution Levels Membership Benefits Wings Subscription to the bi-annual Tropical Wings Newsletter Hummingbird Advanced notice of birding and conservation events Newsletter $15 (Students & Seniors) Priority registration for the Costa Rica Bird-a-thon Trip Spring 2017 Volume 1 Issue 1 To become a member, please complete Warbler the membership form and mail with payment to: Birding Journal $35 (Individuals) Tropical Wings, Inc. A Message from the 2107 Chestnut Dr. President of Tropical Wings Hudson, Wisconsin, 54016 .................................Page 2 National Park Service and the Osprey Thank You to our Members Sister Parks Agreement WOOD THRUSH ....................Page 3 $50 (Households) The following people have become new members to Page 4................................. the Tropical Wings community. Your contributions help us achieve our mission. Thank you! Community Partners Carpenter Nature Center Tom Clark Jim Freund Kelsey Hans Falcon Craig Leiser Tracy Maki Mark Martell and Donations > $50 Belwin Conservancy Page 5.................................. Costa Rica Bird-a-thon MEMBER INFORMATION: Name:____________________________________ Phone:_________________________________ Page 6.................................. Street Address:_____________________________ Email: _________________________________ City:___________________ State:_____________________ Zipcode: _________________ Membership PAYMENT OPTIONS: Join the Flock I would like to pay by check made payable to Tropical Wings, Inc. CONTRIBUTION LEVEL: I would like to pay by credit card Card Type:__________________________ Hummingbird—$15 Card #:________________________________ CSC #:_____________ Exp.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Assessment of the American Crocodile, Crocodylus Acutus (Crocodilia: Crocodylidae) on the Pacific Coast of Costa Rica
    Population assessment of the American crocodile, Crocodylus acutus (Crocodilia: Crocodylidae) on the Pacific coast of Costa Rica Laurie A. Mauger1,6, Elizabeth Velez2, Michael S. Cherkiss3, Matthew L. Brien4, Michael Boston5, Frank J. Mazzotti3 & James R. Spotila6 1. Department of Biology, Southern Utah University, 351 West University Boulevard, Cedar City, UT 84720, USA; [email protected] 2. Kelonian Conservation Society, P.O. Box 473-3000, Heredia, Costa Rica; [email protected] 3. University of Florida Fort Lauderdale Research and Education Center, 3205 College Ave, Davie, FL 33314, USA; [email protected], [email protected] 4. Charles Darwin University, Casuarina 0810, Australia; [email protected] 5. Casa Verde, 100 meters east of the Catholic Church, Puerto Jimenez, Puntarenas 8203, Costa Rica; [email protected] 6. Department of Biology, Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut St, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; [email protected], [email protected] Received 11-X-2011. Corrected 30-IV-2012. Accepted 29-V-2012. Abstract: The American crocodile, Crocodylus acutus, is widely distributed in the American neotropics. It is endangered throughout most of its range and is listed as vulnerable by the International Union for the Conservation of Natural Fauna and Flora (IUCN) and on Appendix I of the Convention for the International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Flora and Fauna (CITES). Despite this listing, there are few published reports on population status throughout most of its range. We investigated the status of the C. acutus, at several locations along the Pacific coast of Costa Rica. We carried out spotlight and nesting surveys from 2007-2009 along the Costa Rican Pacific coast in four distinct areas, coastal areas of Las Baulas (N=40) and Santa Rosa (N=9) National Parks and the Osa Conservation Area (N=13), and upriver in Palo Verde National Park (N=11).
    [Show full text]
  • Miles, William Thomas Stead (2010) Ecology, Behaviour and Predator- Prey Interactions of Great Skuas and Leach's Storm-Petrels at St Kilda
    Miles, William Thomas Stead (2010) Ecology, behaviour and predator- prey interactions of Great Skuas and Leach's Storm-petrels at St Kilda. PhD thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/2297/ Copyright and moral rights for this thesis are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Glasgow Theses Service http://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] Ecology, behaviour and predator-prey interactions of Great Skuas and Leach’s Storm-petrels at St Kilda W. T. S. Miles Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy to the Faculty of Biomedical and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow June 2010 For Alison & Patrick Margaret & Gurney, Edna & Dennis 1 …after sunset, a first shadowy bird would appear circling over the ruins, seen intermittently because of its wide circuit in the thickening light. The fast jerky flight seemed feather-light, to have a buoyant butterfly aimlessness. Another appeared, and another. Island Going (1949 ): Leach’s Petrel 2 Declaration I declare that the work described in this thesis is of my own composition and has been carried out entirely by myself unless otherwise cited or acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification of Icelandic Watersheds and Rivers to Explain Life History Strategies of Atlantic Salmon
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Siaurdur Gudjonsson for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Fisheries Science presented on May 17, 1990. Title: Classification of Icelandic Watersheds and Rivers to Explain Life History Strategies of Atlantic Salmon Abstract approved: 4 Redacted for Privacy Charles E. Warren A hierarchical classification system of Iceland's watersheds and rivers is presented. The classification is based on Iceland's substrate, climate, water, biota, and human cultural influences. The geological formations of Iceland are very different in character depending on their age and formation history. Three major types of formations occur: Tertiary, Plio-Pleistocene, and Pleistocene. These formations have different hydrological characters and different landscapes. There are also large differences in the climate within Iceland. Four major river types are found in Iceland: spring-fed rivers in Pleistocene areas, direct runoff rivers in Plio-Pleistocene areas, direct runoff rivers in Tertiary areas and wetland heath rivers in Tertiary areas. Eleven biogeoclimatic regions occur in Iceland, each having a different watershed type. The classification together with life history theory can explain the distributions, abundances, and life history strategies of Icelandic salmonids. Oceanic conditions must also be considered to explain the life history patterns of anadromous populations. When the freshwater and marine habitat is stable, the life history patterns of individuals in a population tend to be uniform, one life history form being most common. In an unstable environment many life history forms occur and the life span of one generation is long. The properties of the habitat can further explain which life history types are present.
    [Show full text]
  • Obtaining World Heritage Status and the Impacts of Listing Aa, Bart J.M
    University of Groningen Preserving the heritage of humanity? Obtaining world heritage status and the impacts of listing Aa, Bart J.M. van der IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2005 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Aa, B. J. M. V. D. (2005). Preserving the heritage of humanity? Obtaining world heritage status and the impacts of listing. s.n. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 23-09-2021 Appendix 4 World heritage site nominations Listed site in May 2004 (year of rejection, year of listing, possible year of extension of the site) Rejected site and not listed until May 2004 (first year of rejection) Afghanistan Península Valdés (1999) Jam,
    [Show full text]
  • Confirmed Soc Reports List 2015-2016
    Confirmed State of Conservation Reports for natural and mixed World Heritage sites 2015 - 2016 Nr Region Country Site Natural or Additional information mixed site 1 LAC Argentina Iguazu National Park Natural 2 APA Australia Tasmanian Wilderness Mixed 3 EURNA Belarus / Poland Bialowieza Forest Natural 4 LAC Belize Belize Barrier Reef Reserve System Natural World Heritage in Danger 5 AFR Botswana Okavango Delta Natural 6 LAC Brazil Iguaçu National Park Natural 7 LAC Brazil Cerrado Protected Areas: Chapada dos Veadeiros and Natural Emas National Parks 8 EURNA Bulgaria Pirin National Park Natural 9 AFR Cameroon Dja Faunal Reserve Natural 10 EURNA Canada Gros Morne National Park Natural 11 AFR Central African Republic Manovo-Gounda St Floris National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 12 LAC Costa Rica / Panama Talamanca Range-La Amistad Reserves / La Amistad Natural National Park 13 AFR Côte d'Ivoire Comoé National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 14 AFR Côte d'Ivoire / Guinea Mount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve Natural World Heritage in Danger 15 AFR Democratic Republic of the Congo Garamba National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 16 AFR Democratic Republic of the Congo Kahuzi-Biega National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 17 AFR Democratic Republic of the Congo Okapi Wildlife Reserve Natural World Heritage in Danger 18 AFR Democratic Republic of the Congo Salonga National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 19 AFR Democratic Republic of the Congo Virunga National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 20 AFR Democratic
    [Show full text]
  • Iucn Summary Gough Island (United Kingdom) 2
    WORLD HERITAGE NOMINATION - IUCN SUMMARY GOUGH ISLAND (UNITED KINGDOM) Summary prepared by IUCN/WCMC (March 1995) based on the original nomination supplied by the Government of the United Kingdom. This original and all documents in support of this nomination will be available for consultation at the meetings of the Bureau and the Committee. 1. LOCATION Located southeast of Tristan da Cunha Island in the south Atlantic Ocean, midway between Africa and South America. 2. JURIDICAL DATA The island and surrounding territorial waters were designated a wildlife area in 1976 under the Tristan da Cunha Conservation Ordinance. 3. IDENTIFICATION The island of Gough (6500ha) represents the eroded core of a Late Tertiary volcano. The east side of the island is dissected by a series of deep steep-sided valleys, which are separated by narrow serrated ridges. Along the west side of the island, rounded slopes extend from the central plateau to the western sea cliffs. Many offshore stacks and rocks are present, mostly within 100m of the main island. Vegetation comprises tussock grass around the coast and wet heath with moss and feldmark, and bog and swamp communities at higher elevations. Knowledge of the flora is incomplete but consists of some 35 native flowering plant and 28 native fern species. Over 30 of Gough's vascular plant taxa are endemic to the Tristan de Cunha islands. A total of 146 bryophytes have been recorded, eight of which are endemic, together with 20 fungi and 24 lichens. Invertebrate fauna also remains poorly known, but comprises 100 species, eight of which are endemic.
    [Show full text]
  • A Global Overview of Protected Areas on the World Heritage List of Particular Importance for Biodiversity
    A GLOBAL OVERVIEW OF PROTECTED AREAS ON THE WORLD HERITAGE LIST OF PARTICULAR IMPORTANCE FOR BIODIVERSITY A contribution to the Global Theme Study of World Heritage Natural Sites Text and Tables compiled by Gemma Smith and Janina Jakubowska Maps compiled by Ian May UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre Cambridge, UK November 2000 Disclaimer: The contents of this report and associated maps do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNEP-WCMC or contributory organisations. The designations employed and the presentations do not imply the expressions of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP-WCMC or contributory organisations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authority, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION 1.0 OVERVIEW......................................................................................................................................................1 2.0 ISSUES TO CONSIDER....................................................................................................................................1 3.0 WHAT IS BIODIVERSITY?..............................................................................................................................2 4.0 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY......................................................................................................................3 5.0 CURRENT WORLD HERITAGE SITES............................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]