DOCSLIB.ORG

Assembling Nature Knowledge, Values and Conservation Spaces in Namibia’S Zambezi Region

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Following Elephants: Assembling Nature Knowledge, Values and Conservation Spaces in Namibia’s Zambezi Region Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Leicester Lee John Hewitson, MRes Department of Geography 2018 Following Elephants: Assembling Nature Knowledge, Values and Conservation Spaces in Namibia’s Zambezi Region Lee John Hewitson Abstract This thesis aims to explore the production of nature knowledges and values in the context of Namibian Community-Based Natural Resource Management (CBNRM). In that respect, it is a response to calls for in-depth research into the lived experience of CBNRM, and this study attends to those situated knowledges and values crucial to the programme’s success. It does so by adopting a case study approach in Kwandu Conservancy, in Namibia’s Zambezi Region. The conceptual approach embraces the collaborative potential between political ecology studies that have critiqued dominant constructions of (neoliberal) natures, and posthuman approaches adopting a more expansive view of socio- natures. As part of a ‘more than-human ethnography’, this involves ‘following’ African elephants (Loxodonta africana) in order to trace their relational connections with other (non)humans as they assemble space. Through these affective interactions relational knowledges and values are produced. These nature-culture ontologies do not inhere in elephants or other ‘things’, but are processual and formed in open-ended encounters between (non)humans. Relational interactions between humans, elephants and other lively things (de)territorialise topographical space and (de)stabilise neoliberal governmentalities. The study therefore emphasises the role of agentic nonhumans in (re)assembling CBNRM spaces that are contingent and fractious, offering hope to political ecologists seeking to challenge capitalist nature-culture framings. Relatedly, the fluid, multiple, and provisional socio-natures assembled also necessitate a re-thinking of conservation policy and practice. As such, the study recommends CBNRM practitioners embrace this generative ontology, nurturing the open-ended relational values that humans and nonhumans produce together in order to assemble more equitable and ecologically healthy socio-natural futures. i Acknowledgments At the University of Leicester I would like to extend special thanks Dr Caroline Upton and Professor Clare Madge, both of whom have provided excellent supervisory support throughout the course of this project. In Namibia, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to the residents of Kwandu Conservancy for welcoming me into their community. In particular, I thank all those who participated in the study and spared the time to talk with me. For providing me with vital contacts in the field and sharing their insights into Namibian conservation, I would like to give special thanks to Karine Nuulimba, Carol Murphy and John Hazam. I am also extremely grateful to Jamy, Dwight, Leo and Jackie for allowing me to join them on the elephant trail. Without doubt, this project would not have been completed without the love, moral support and assistance of family and friends. My Mam and Nanna deserve special mention for providing me with space to write when times were tough, and it is to them both that I dedicate this work. ii Table of Contents ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................................I ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ........................................................................................................... II TABLE OF CONTENTS ...........................................................................................................III LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................. VIII LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................... IX LIST OF PLATES .................................................................................................................... XII ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................ XIV CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................1 1.1 Research Context: Namibia, CBNRM and Elephants .......................................... 1 1.1.1 CBNRM ............................................................................................................... 1 1.1.2 CBNRM in Namibia ............................................................................................ 2 1.1.3 Elephants .............................................................................................................. 6 1.2 Aims, Objectives and Research Questions ........................................................... 11 1.3 Thesis Structure ...................................................................................................... 12 CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW AND CONCEPTUAL APPROACH .................. 15 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 15 2.2 CBNRM and Landscape Conservation................................................................. 17 2.2.1 Critiquing CBNRM ............................................................................................ 17 2.2.2 Ecosystem and Landscape Connectivity ............................................................ 21 2.3 Theorising Socio-Natures: Political Ecology, the Production of Nature, and Neoliberal Conservation ............................................................................................... 23 2.3.1 Political Ecology – Challenging the Nature/Society Binary .............................. 23 2.3.2 Neoliberal Conservation and the Value of Nature ............................................. 26 2.4 Relational and ‘More-Than-Human’ Socio-Natures ........................................... 32 iii 2.4.1 Non-Representation and Practice ....................................................................... 32 2.4.2 Emotional and Affectual Socio-Natures ............................................................ 32 2.4.3 Re-materialising Socio-Natures: Actor-Network Theory and Hybridity ........... 35 2.4.4 Assemblages ....................................................................................................... 37 2.4.5 Animal(s’) Geographies – Wildlife Topologies and Lively Biogeographies .... 40 2.4.6 Relational Knowledge, Value and Culturenature Ontologies ............................ 42 2.4.7 Multi-Natural Conservation ............................................................................... 44 2.5 Towards ‘More-Than-Representational’ Socio-Natures: Following Assembled Things ............................................................................................................................. 46 2.6 Conclusion ............................................................................................................... 49 CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................... 51 3.1 Conservation Contexts ........................................................................................... 51 3.1.1 Namibia .............................................................................................................. 51 3.1.2 Zambezi Region: An Accident of Colonial Geography ..................................... 54 3.1.3 Kwandu Conservancy ........................................................................................ 58 3.2 Assemblage as Methodological Framework ......................................................... 60 3.3 Data Collection ........................................................................................................ 60 3.3.1 Ethnography and Participant Observation ......................................................... 60 3.3.2 Following the Thing ........................................................................................... 61 3.3.3 Interviews ........................................................................................................... 64 3.3.4 Secondary Data .................................................................................................. 65 3.4 Data Analysis ........................................................................................................... 65 3.5 Assembling the Field: Research(er) Ethics, Challenges, and Positionality ....... 68 3.6 Research Limitations .............................................................................................. 71 3.6.1 Situated Knowledge ........................................................................................... 71 3.6.2 Short-Term Ethnography? .................................................................................. 71 3.6.3 Solely Qualitative ............................................................................................... 72 3.6.4 Translation Issues ............................................................................................... 72 3.7 Conclusion ............................................................................................................... 73 CHAPTER 4: CO-PRODUCING ELEPHANT KNOWLEDGE – SPATIAL AND CONCEPTUAL TERRITORIALISATION ..........................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Research Report

    Research Report

    Research Report Commercialisation of Land in Namibia’s Communal Land Areas: A critical look at potential irrigation projects in Kavango East and Zambezi regions Maarit Thiem and Theodor Muduva PLAAS Institute for Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies School of Government • EMS Faculty Research Report Research Report Commercialisation of Land in Namibia’s Communal Land Areas: A critical look at potential irrigation projects in Kavango East and Zambezi regions Maarit Thiem and Theodor Muduva June 2015 PLAAS Institute for Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies School of Government • EMS Faculty iii Published by the Institute for Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies, School of Government, Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences, University of the Western Cape, Private Bag X17, Bellville 7535, Cape Town, South Africa. Tel: +27 21 959 3733. Fax: +27 21 959 3732. E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.plaas.org.za Institute for Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies Research Report no. 43 ISBN: 978-1-86808-717-4 June 2015 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior permission from the publisher or the authors. Author: Maarit Thiem and Theodor Muduva Copy editor: Joy Clack Series editor: Rebecca Pointer Layout: Design for development, www.d4d.co.za Typeset in Frutiger Research Report Contents Acronyms iv Acknowledgements v Abstract vi Introduction 1 Background 2 Objectives, methods and approaches 5 Study regions and case studies 6 Awareness raising campaign in Kavango and Zambezi
  • In Community Based Natural Resources Management in Zambezi Region, Namibia Rodger Lubilo

    In Community Based Natural Resources Management in Zambezi Region, Namibia Rodger Lubilo

    Enactment of ‘Community’ in Community Based Natural Resources Management in Zambezi Region, Namibia Rodger Lubilo Enactment of ‘Community’ in Community Based Natural Resources Management in Zambezi Region, Namibia Rodgers Lubilo Thesis committee Promotor Prof. Dr H. van Dijk Personal chair at Sociology of Development and Change Group Wageningen University & Research Co-promotor Dr P. Hebinck Associate professor, Sociology of Development and Change Group Wageningen University & Research Other members Prof. Dr V.R. van der Duim, Wageningen University & Research Prof. Dr S.E. Shackleton, University of Cape Town, South Africa Prof. Dr M. Bollig, University of Cologne, Germany Prof. Dr M.J. Spierenburg, Radboud University Nijmegen This research was conducted under the auspices of the Wageningen School of Social Sciences (WASS) Enactment of ‘Community’ in Community Based Natural Resources Management in Zambezi Region, Namibia Rodgers Lubilo Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of doctor at Wageningen University by the authority of the Rector Magnificus, Prof. Dr A.P.J. Mol, in the presence of the Thesis Committee appointed by the Academic Board to be defended in public on Tuesday8 May 2018 at 01.30 p.m. in the Aula. Rodgers Lubilo Enactment of ‘Community’ in Community Based Natural Resources Management in Zambezi Region, Namibia, 214 pages. PhD thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands (2018) With references, with summary in English ISBN 978-94-6343-858-2 DOI https://doi.org/10.18174/446408 Table
  • Luregn Lenggenhager Nature Conservation, Development And

    Luregn Lenggenhager Nature Conservation, Development And

    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2018 Ruling nature, controlling people: nature conservation, development and war in North-Eastern Namibia since the 1920s Lenggenhager, Luregn Abstract: Recent nature conservation initiatives in Southern Africa such as communal conservancies and peace parks are often embedded in narratives of economic development and ecological research. They are also increasingly marked by militarisation and violence. In Ruling Nature, Controlling People, Luregn Lenggenhager shows that these features were also characteristic of South African rule over the Caprivi Strip region in North-Eastern Namibia, especially in the fields of forestry, fisheries and, ulti- mately, wildlife conservation. In the process, the increasingly internationalised war in the region from the late 1960s until Namibia’s independence in 1990 became intricately interlinked with contemporary nature conservation, ecology and economic development projects. By retracing such interdependencies, Lenggenhager provides a novel perspective from which to examine the history of a region which has until now barely entered the focus of historical research. He thereby highlights the enduring relevance of the supposedly peripheral Caprivi and its military, scientific and environmental histories for efforts to develop a deeper understanding of the ways in which apartheid South Africa exerted state power. Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-150287 Monograph Published Version Originally published at: Lenggenhager, Luregn (2018). Ruling nature, controlling people: nature conservation, development and war in North-Eastern Namibia since the 1920s. Basel: Basler Afrika Bibliographien. Luregn Lenggenhager Ruling Nature, Controlling People Caprivi Strip region in North-Eastern Namibia, especially in the fields of forestry, fisheries and, ultimately, wildlife conservation.
  • The Making of a Conservation Landscape

    The Making of a Conservation Landscape

    Africa 91 (2) 2021: 270–95 doi:10.1017/S0001972021000061 The making of a conservation landscape: the emergence of a conservationist environmental infrastructure along the Kwando River in Namibia’s Zambezi region Michael Bollig and Hauke-Peter Vehrs Introduction The giant Kavango–Zambezi (KAZA) Transfrontier Conservation Area constitu- tes a major part of Southern Africa’s vast expanses of protected landscapes. In Namibia’s Zambezi region, community-driven conservancies and national parks became part of this giant transborder conservation area, the world’s largest inhabited transboundary conservation landscape, in 2011 when KAZA was formally inaugurated. In our contribution, we are interested in the emergence of this conservation landscape. We will focus our analysis on the Kwando River wetlands and adjoining savannahs (see Figure 1).1 This landscape features import- antly as a migration corridor for large ungulates and as a hub for tourism. The river establishes the boundary between Namibia’s Bwabwata National Park and the Kongola constituency for some forty kilometres, and then for almost seventy kilometres the international boundary between Namibia and Botswana. The river meanders for about 100 kilometres through extensive wetlands, estab- lishing many arms, oxbows and islands. Wide treeless and seasonally inundated wetlands and high stands of gallery forest form the core of the wetlands. Beyond the riverine gallery forest, the region is marked by open savannah wood- lands. Nowadays, villages are typically located some three to five kilometres away from the wetlands on the Namibian side (whereas the Botswanan side is mostly unpopulated), in a line along the tarred Singalamwe–Kongola–Sangwali road. Extensive agricultural fields are concentrated around the villages.