DOCSLIB.ORG

2 City Council District Profiles

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2 City Council District Profiles Lower East Side, East Village, Stuyvesant Town, MANHATTAN Cooper Village, Gramercy, Murray Hill, CITY Kips Bay, West Village, Hudson Yards, COUNCIL 2009 DISTRICT 2 Chelsea, Flatiron, Union Square Parks are an essential city service. They are the barometers of our city. From Flatbush to Flushing and Morrisania to Midtown, parks are the front and backyards of all New Yorkers. Well-maintained and designed parks offer recreation and solace, improve property values, reduce crime, and contribute to healthy communities. SHOWCASE : Stuyvesant Square The Daffodil Project, a partner- ship between New Yorkers for Parks and the NYC Parks Department, was created as a citywide beautification project and living memorial to Sep- tember 11. Each year, thanks to the generous donation of B&K Flowerbulbs, the two groups distribute hundreds of thousands of free daffodil bulbs for volun- teers and community groups to plant in New York City’s parks Tompkins Square Park, East Village and open spaces. In 2008 PS 40 planted thousands of daffodil The Bloomberg Administration’s physical barriers or crime. As a result, bulbs in Stuyvesant Square. Visit PlaNYC is the first-ever effort to studies show significant increases in www.ny4p.org for more informa- sustainably address the many infra- nearby real estate values. Greenways tion on The Daffodil Project. structure needs of New York City, are expanding waterfront access including parks. With targets set for while creating safer routes for cyclists stormwater management, air quality and pedestrians, and the new initia- and more, the City is working to tive to reclaim streets for public use update infrastructure for a growing brings fresh vibrancy to the city. population while addressing envi- ronmental concerns. Through ambi- New York City’s population is tious goals to increase access to parks projected to increase by one million and open spaces, New York’s fiscally new residents by 2030, and demand prudent administration affirms that for our 29,000 acres of parkland investing in parks is good business. will only grow. It is imperative that creative efforts to expand our open Park innovations have flourished in spaces continue—but perhaps more recent years. The creation of Hudson importantly, existing parks must be River Park and the revitalization of protected, maintained and adequate- Bryant Park allow access to areas ly funded to best serve current and that were previously off-limits due to future New Yorkers. City Council District Profiles City Council District Profiles Citywide CITYWIDE Parks by the A New Master Plan for Parks Numbers Significant steps have been made toward PlaNYC’s parks and open space targets, which include ensuring 29,000 that every New Yorker lives within a 10-minute walk Acres of parkland of a park and planting 1 million trees. Important 1,700 projects like the development of regional parks and Parks the “schoolyards-to-playgrounds” initiative, which opens schoolyards after hours to the public, increase 1,000 recreation space, thus resulting in an even greater Playgrounds need for maintenance funds. 2,300 PlaNYC shows the City’s commitment to Greenstreets improving open space and recreation opportunities. 12,000 Now, we must take the next step and create a master Acres of natural areas plan for New York City’s parks, which does not exist today. A master plan would respond to particular 600,000 neighborhood and regional needs and outline how Park trees best to expand the park system to serve current 2 million and future residents. Street trees Any expansion to the parks system requires 14 maintenance funding. Most city parks rely on Miles of beaches public funding, but this is not a predictable source as evidenced by the current economic recession. 800 While spending on park maintenance increased by Athletic fields 50 percent under Mayor Bloomberg between 2003 50 and 2008, a gloomy economic forecast can be expect- Recreation centers ed to result in cuts to the Parks budget in 2009 and beyond. Public-private partnerships will be affected 66 by the recession as well. Innovative funding streams Pools —as well as improved management strategies— can help ensure that the parks system will 6 weather these storms. Top: Breininger Playground, Queens Ice rinks Above: Central Park, Manhattan 22 Historic house museums Historical City Funding for the Parks Department (Adjusted) 1,000 $500 Monuments, sculptures and $400 historical markers DOLLARS $300 OF $200 MILLIONS $100 IN $0 ’89 ’90 ’91 ’92 ’93 ’94 ’95 ’96 ’97 ’98 ’99 ’00 ’01 ’02 ’03 ’04 ’05 ’06 ’07 ’08 ’09 ’10* FISCAL YEAR *2010 = Projected budget By the Borough: Manhattan MANHATTAN Public-Private Partnerships Park Inspection Program Ratings: Parks by the Manhattan vs. Citywide (Percent rated acceptable) Numbers Manhattan’s parks are well-loved and well-used. Manhattan Citywide When New York City’s fiscal crisis of the 1970s 100% 671 resulted in a decline in park conditions, a new Acres of natural areas movement of private support through public-private 90% partnerships was born. Manhattan’s parks have ben- 209 efited significantly from groups like the Central Park Playgrounds 80% Conservancy and Madison Square Park Conservancy, which have brought innovative management and 130 70% Comfort stations additional funding to the parks. Every park along 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Fifth Avenue from Central Park to the Battery The Parks Department conducts 5,000 park inspections annually 576 benefits from private support and funding. through their internal rating system, the Park Inspection Program. Drinking fountains Twenty-three non-profit partner groups fundraise 160 for Manhattan parks, in addition to 10 groups that Athletic fields raise money to support parks citywide. 215 Basketball courts 317 Greenstreets 22 Pools Manhattan Park Staffing 33 Gardeners & Assistant Gardeners 237 City Parks Workers At left: Bennett Park, Washington Heights & Associate Park Above: Bryant Park, Midtown Service Workers 57 Manhattan has the 3rd lowest percentage of land devoted to parks of the five boroughs. Park Supervisors Manhattan Citywide Park acreage 2,711 29,000 34 Recreation Directors & Percent of borough devoted to parks 19% 14% Specialists Manhattan has the highest number of residents per acre of parkland of the five boroughs. 28 Total population 1.5 million 8 million Playground Associates Residents per acre of parkland 567 276 54 Manhattan has the lowest tree canopy coverage of the five boroughs. Parks Enforcement Patrol Tree canopy (trees on public and private land) 13% 24% (PEP) Officers & Urban Park Rangers Number of street trees per mile of sidewalk 49 41 Corlears Hook Park, Lower East Side manhattan CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT 2 T Tudor City AV 0 0.51 Miles ARK P From Manhattan Community Board 3: District Statistics Murray Hill ACREAGE OF CITY PARKS AV Total district acreage 1,036 7 E 35 ST The open space/population ratio Total parkland acreage 102 ‘‘is approximately 0.7 acres per Percent City parkland Parks & playgrounds acreage 94 of total district acreage Percent parkland 10% 1,000 people…. The open space AY Citywide 14% DW we do have is not evenly distributed OA 36 BR Ranking of City parkland POPULATION 3 acres/resident Population 154,310 throughout the district…. Toilets S (1=highest, 51=lowest) AV E 28 ST Population under 18 17,733 Chelsea ARK in Community Board 3 parks and P 1 Percent under 18 11% 24 Acres parkland per 1000 residents <1 playgrounds are badly needed. Ranking of City parks & playgrounds acres/child Acres parks and playgrounds per 1,000 children 5 AS 2 LANGUAGE ACCESS CD 2 Citywide Statement of Needs for Fiscal Year 2008 AMERIC Flatiron E 23 ST THE Most common foreign language spoken at home Spanish Spanish OF Percent of homes speaking this language 15% 18% ’’ AV CIVIC ENGAGEMENT CD 2 Citywide Parks, playgrounds NW E 19 ST Registered voters 89% 76% ICH Gramercy AV Number general parks-related and beaches 4 311 calls per 1,000 residents 5 10 1 Albano Playground 9 Dry Dock Playground 3 Number of parks-related 311 calls for maintenance 2 Bellevue South Park 10 El Jardin del Paraiso 2 4 F D R DR per 1,000 residents 2 1 3 Union Square Park 11 Hamilton Fish Park PARK RESOURCES CD 2 Citywide 4 Peter’s Field 12 Wald Playground E 14 ST 5 Does not include capital funding allocated to multiple districts or citywide. 5 Stuyvesant Square 13 Baruch Playground AV 2 District-specific capital funding, 2004–2009 $2.4 million $4.2 million 6 Saucer Park 14 East River Park AV 7 Tompkins Square Park 15 Vladeck Park 4 PARKS INSPECTION PROGRAM RATINGS Stuyvesant Town 8 McKinley Playground 16 Corlears Hook Park Results of the Parks Department’s internal inspections. FY 2004 FY 2008 100 C AV Greenwich Village 80 92% 88% 88% 86% LEGEND nn DPR community gardens 60 40 1/8 Mile nn Other community gardens ST MARK'S PL rated cent parks r Council District Border 20 “acceptable” nn DPR beaches 6 Pe nn New York City Department of nn State and federal parkland W HOUST East Village 0 CD 2 Citywide Parks and Recreation (DPR) E 5 ST ON ST A nn City-owned vacant land parks, playgrounds and AV OPEN SPACE CD 2 Citywide greenstreets Q DPR schoolyards-to- playgrounds sites 7 Number of community gardens per 1,000 acres 48 4 nn DPR natural areas 9 Y Vacant lot acreage 13 8,512 (Schoolyards-to-playgrounds is a citywide PlaNYC initiative E 3 ST to open schoolyards to the public during afterschool hours.) WER Percent vacant 1% 4% BO 8 D HEALTH AV Number of hospital admissions per 10,000 residents: CD 2 Citywide Asthma 27 31 10 Diabetes 10 11 EDUCATION CD 2 Citywide Little Italy Percent fourth graders meeting standards in math 83% 81% Percent fourth graders meeting standards in reading 67% 63% 11 12 DELANCEY ST ETTE ST Y FA Lower East Side 1 13 Tompkins Square Park, East Village Chinatown 14 Tools for Action Let your elected officials know how important parks are to you.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 5.1: Land Use, Zoning, and Public Policy A. INTRODUCTION
    Chapter 5.1: Land Use, Zoning, and Public Policy A. INTRODUCTION This chapter describes existing land use, zoning, and public policies applicable to the proposed project and evaluates potential significant adverse effects that may result from implementation of the proposed flood protection system. Potential significant adverse effects to land use as a result of implementing the flood protection system are also evaluated. Potential land use issues include known or likely changes in current land uses within the study area, as well as the proposed project’s potential effect on existing and future land use patterns. Potential zoning and public policy issues include the compatibility of the proposed project with existing zoning and consistency with existing applicable public policies. PROJECT AREA ONE Project Area One extends from Montgomery Street on the south to the north end of John V. Lindsay East River Park (East River Park) at about East 13th Street. Project Area One consists primarily of the Franklin Delano Roosevelt East River Drive (FDR Drive) right-of-way, a portion of Pier 42 and Corlears Hook Park as well as East River Park. The majority of Project Area One is within East River Park and includes four existing pedestrian bridges across the FDR Drive to East River Park (Corlears Hook, Delancey Street, East 6th Street, and East 10th Street Bridges) and the East Houston Street overpass. Project Area One is located within Manhattan Community District 3, and borders portions of the Lower East Side and East Village neighborhoods. PROJECT AREA TWO Project Area Two extends north and east from Project Area One, from East 13th Street to East 25th Street.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of Occupy Wall Street ROSA LUXEMBURG STIFTUNG NEW YORK OFFICE by Ethan Earle Table of Contents
    A Brief History of Occupy Wall Street ROSA LUXEMBURG STIFTUNG NEW YORK OFFICE By Ethan Earle Table of Contents Spontaneity and Organization. By the Editors................................................................................1 A Brief History of Occupy Wall Street....................................................2 By Ethan Earle The Beginnings..............................................................................................................................2 Occupy Wall Street Goes Viral.....................................................................................................4 Inside the Occupation..................................................................................................................7 Police Evictions and a Winter of Discontent..............................................................................9 How to Occupy Without an Occupation...................................................................................10 How and Why It Happened........................................................................................................12 The Impact of Occupy.................................................................................................................15 The Future of OWS.....................................................................................................................16 Published by the Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung, New York Office, November 2012 Editors: Stefanie Ehmsen and Albert Scharenberg Address: 275 Madison Avenue, Suite 2114,
    [Show full text]
  • The Occupy Wall Street Movement's Struggle Over Privately Owned
    International Journal of Communication 11(2017), 3162–3181 1932–8036/20170005 A Noneventful Social Movement: The Occupy Wall Street Movement’s Struggle Over Privately Owned Public Space HAO CAO The University of Texas at Austin, USA Why did the Occupy Wall Street movement settle in Zuccotti Park, a privately owned public space? Why did the movement get evicted after a two-month occupation? To answer these questions, this study offers a new tentative framework, spatial opportunity structure, to understand spatial politics in social movements as the interaction of spatial structure and agency. Drawing on opportunity structure models, Sewell’s dual concept of spatial structure and agency, and his concept of event, I analyze how the Occupy activists took over and repurposed Zuccotti Park from a site of consumption and leisure to a space of political claim making. Yet, with unsympathetic public opinion, intensifying policing and surveillance, and unfavorable court rulings privileging property rights over speech rights, the temporary success did not stabilize into a durable transformation of spatial structure. My study not only explains the Occupy movement’s spatial politics but also offers a novel framework to understand the struggle over privatization of public space for future social movements and public speech and assembly in general. Keywords: Occupy Wall Street movement, privately owned public space (POPS), spatial opportunity structure, spatial agency, spatial structure, event Collective actions presuppose the copresence of “large numbers of people into limited spaces” (Sewell, 2001, p. 58). To hold many people, such spaces should, in principle, be public sites that permit free access to everyone. The Occupy Wall Street (OWS) movement, targeting the engulfing inequality in the age of financialization and neoliberalization, used occupation of symbolic sites to convey its message.
    [Show full text]
  • IN NEW YORK CITY January/February/March 2019 Welcome to Urban Park Outdoors in Ranger Facilities New York City Please Call Specific Locations for Hours
    OutdoorsIN NEW YORK CITY January/February/March 2019 Welcome to Urban Park Outdoors in Ranger Facilities New York City Please call specific locations for hours. BRONX As winter takes hold in New York City, it is Pelham Bay Ranger Station // (718) 319-7258 natural to want to stay inside. But at NYC Pelham Bay Park // Bruckner Boulevard Parks, we know that this is a great time of and Wilkinson Avenue year for New Yorkers to get active and enjoy the outdoors. Van Cortlandt Nature Center // (718) 548-0912 Van Cortlandt Park // West 246th Street and Broadway When the weather outside is frightful, consider it an opportunity to explore a side of the city that we can only experience for a few BROOKLYN months every year. The Urban Park Rangers Salt Marsh Nature Center // (718) 421-2021 continue to offer many unique opportunities Marine Park // East 33rd Street and Avenue U throughout the winter. Join us to kick off 2019 on a guided New Year’s Day Hike in each borough. This is also the best time to search MANHATTAN for winter wildlife, including seals, owls, Payson Center // (212) 304-2277 and eagles. Kids Week programs encourage Inwood Hill Park // Payson Avenue and families to get outside and into the park while Dyckman Street school is out. This season, grab your boots, mittens, and QUEENS hat, and head to your nearest park! New York Alley Pond Park Adventure Center City parks are open and ready to welcome you (718) 217-6034 // (718) 217-4685 year-round. Alley Pond Park // Enter at Winchester Boulevard, under the Grand Central Parkway Forest Park Ranger Station // (718) 846-2731 Forest Park // Woodhaven Boulevard and Forest Park Drive Fort Totten Visitors Center // (718) 352-1769 Fort Totten Park // Enter the park at fort entrance, north of intersection of 212th Street and Cross Island Parkway and follow signs STATEN ISLAND Blue Heron Nature Center // (718) 967-3542 Blue Heron Park // 222 Poillon Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Will a Giant Boob Or Chameleon Inaugurate the High Line's New
    Voon, Claire. “Will a Giant Boob or Chameleon Inaugurate the High Line’s New Public Art Plinth?”, Hyperallergic, January, 2017. [online] [ill.] Will a Giant Boob or Chameleon Inaugurate the High Line’s New Public Art Plinth? Rendering of Lena Henke’s “Ascent of a Woman” (2016), her proposal for the High Line Plinth (architectural rendering by James Corner Field Operations and Diller Scofidio + Renfro, courtesy the City of New York; artwork courtesy the artist) Come next spring, a giant chameleon, a standalone carillon, or a singular, upturned breast may grace the elevated grounds of the High Line. They’re just three of 12 sculptures proposed by 12 artists and vying to inaugurate what will be the industrial park’s first space dedicated specifically to art: the High Line Plinth. If that name sounds familiar, you’re likely thinking of London’s Fourth Plinth, the prominent pedestal in Trafalgar Square that’s currently home to a colossal thumb by David Shrigley. Friends of the High Line drew inspiration directly from that 176-year-old plinth for this endeavor, which is forthcoming in the spring of 2018. The nonprofit conservancy already has an impressive history of promoting culture through High Line Art, which has placed a variety of exhibitions, commissions, and performances all along the park’s tracks, but the new plinth will establish a spot specifically for contemporary art. It will serve the same purpose as its pal across the pond, hosting a series of works by international artists on an 18-month rotating schedule — and yes, you can expect them all to be rather grand in scale, as conspicuous as the ones that have towered over the British square.
    [Show full text]
  • 550 Washington Street/Special Hudson River Park District 1
    City Environmental Quality Review ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT STATEMENT FULL FORM Please fill out, print and submit to the appropriate agency (see instructions) PART I: GENERAL INFORMATION PROJECT NAME 550 Washington Street/Special Hudson River Park District 1. Reference Numbers CEQR REFERENCE NUMBER (To Be Assigned by Lead Agency) BSA REFERENCE NUMBER (If Applicable) 16DCP031M ULURP REFERENCE NUMBER (If Applicable) OTHER REFERENCE NUMBER(S) (If Applicable) (e.g., Legislative Intro, CAPA, etc.) Pending 2a. Lead Agency Information 2b. Applicant Information NAME OF LEAD AGENCY NAME OF APPLICANT SJC 33 Owner 2015 LLC New York City Planning Commission DCP Manhattan Borough Office NAME OF LEAD AGENCY CONTACT PERSON NAME OF APPLICANT’S REPRESENTATIVE OR CONTACT PERSON Robert Dobruskin DCP: Edith Hsu-Chen (212-720-3437) Director, Environmental Assessment and Review Division Michael Sillerman, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP ADDRESS ADDRESS 22 Reade Street, Room 4E 1177 Avenue of the Americas CITY STATE ZIP CITY STATE ZIP New York NY 10007 New York NY 10036 TELEPHONE FAX TELEPHONE FAX 212-720-3423 212-720-3495 212-715-7838 EMAIL ADDRESS EMAIL ADDRESS [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 3. Action Classification and Type SEQRA Classification UNLISTED TYPE I; SPECIFY CATEGORY (see 6 NYCRR 617.4 and NYC Executive Order 91 of 1977, as amended): 617.4(6)(v) Action Type (refer to Chapter 2, “Establishing the Analysis Framework” for guidance) LOCALIZED ACTION, SITE SPECIFIC LOCALIZED ACTION, SMALL AREA GENERIC ACTION 4. Project Description: The applicants, the New York City Department of City Planning (DCP) and SJC 33 Owner 2015 LLC, are requesting discretionary approvals (the “proposed actions”) that would facilitate the redevelopment of the St.
    [Show full text]
  • July 8 Grants Press Release
    CITY PARKS FOUNDATION ANNOUNCES 109 GRANTS THROUGH NYC GREEN RELIEF & RECOVERY FUND AND GREEN / ARTS LIVE NYC GRANT APPLICATION NOW OPEN FOR PARK VOLUNTEER GROUPS Funding Awarded For Maintenance and Stewardship of Parks by Nonprofit Organizations and For Free Live Performances in Parks, Plazas, and Gardens Across NYC July 8, 2021 - NEW YORK, NY - City Parks Foundation announced today the selection of 109 grants through two competitive funding opportunities - the NYC Green Relief & Recovery Fund and GREEN / ARTS LIVE NYC. More than ever before, New Yorkers have come to rely on parks and open spaces, the most fundamentally democratic and accessible of public resources. Parks are critical to our city’s recovery and reopening – offering fresh air, recreation, and creativity - and a crucial part of New York’s equitable economic recovery and environmental resilience. These grant programs will help to support artists in hosting free, public performances and programs in parks, plazas, and gardens across NYC, along with the nonprofit organizations that help maintain many of our city’s open spaces. Both grant programs are administered by City Parks Foundation. The NYC Green Relief & Recovery Fund will award nearly $2M via 64 grants to NYC-based small and medium-sized nonprofit organizations. Grants will help to support basic maintenance and operations within heavily-used parks and open spaces during a busy summer and fall with the city’s reopening. Notable projects supported by this fund include the Harlem Youth Gardener Program founded during summer 2020 through a collaboration between Friends of Morningside Park Inc., Friends of St. Nicholas Park, Marcus Garvey Park Alliance, & Jackie Robinson Park Conservancy to engage neighborhood youth ages 14-19 in paid horticulture along with the Bronx River Alliance’s EELS Youth Internship Program and Volunteer Program to invite thousands of Bronxites to participate in stewardship of the parks lining the river banks.
    [Show full text]
  • Position Statement ESTABLISHING a NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT
    APA New York Metro Chapter 121 West 27th Street, Suite 705 New York, NY 10001 Attention: David Fields Phone: (646) 963-9229 Position Statement ESTABLISHING A NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT for the HUDSON RIVER PARK The NY Metro Chapter of the American Planning Association is a professional, educational, and advocacy organization representing over 1,200 practicing planners and policy makers in New York City and its surrounding suburbs. We are part of a national association with a membership of 41,000 professionals and students who are engaged in programs and projects related to the physical, social and economic environment. In our role as a professional advocacy organization, we offer insights and recommendations on policy matters affecting issues such as housing, transportation and the environment. The Chapter has taken an interest in the proposal to form a Neighborhood Improvement District (NID) for the area surrounding the Hudson River Park. While we are generally in support of the proposal, we wish to point out a number of concerns we have with what appears to be an emerging trend of relying on alternative sources of funding for what should be a basic governmental responsibility. BACKGROUND The proposal for the NID was introduced by Friends of Hudson River Park, a private not- for-profit organization dedicated to raising funds for the “completion, care and enhancement” of the Park. Hudson River Park is a regional asset that not only serves the west side of Manhattan, but draws people from all around the metropolitan area. The creation of the Park led to a dramatic increase in property values along West Street, 10th, 11th & 12th Avenues and their intersecting streets.
    [Show full text]
  • Take Advantage of Dog Park Fun That's Off the Chain(PDF)
    TIPS +tails SEPTEMBER 2012 Take Advantage of Dog Park Fun That’s Off the Chain New York City’s many off-leash dog parks provide the perfect venue for a tail-wagging good time The start of fall is probably one of the most beautiful times to be outside in the City with your dog. Now that the dog days are wafting away on cooler breezes, it may be a great time to treat yourself and your pooch to a quality time dedicated to socializing, fun and freedom. Did you know New York City boasts more than 50 off-leash dog parks, each with its own charm and amenities ranging from nature trails to swimming pools? For a good time, keep this list of the top 25 handy and refer to it often. With it, you and your dog will never tire of a walk outside. 1. Carl Schurz Park Dog Run: East End Ave. between 12. Inwood Hill Park Dog Run: Dyckman St and Payson 24. Tompkins Square Park Dog Run: 1st Ave and Ave 84th and 89th St. Stroll along the East River after Ave. It’s a popular City park for both pooches and B between 7th and 10th. Soft mulch and fun times your pup mixes it up in two off-leash dog runs. pet owners, and there’s plenty of room to explore. await at this well-maintained off-leash park. 2. Central Park. Central Park is designated off-leash 13. J. Hood Wright Dog Run: Fort Washington & 25. Washington Square Park Dog Run: Washington for the hours of 9pm until 9am daily.
    [Show full text]
  • Hudson Yards FGEIS
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 8: Shadows ...............................................................................................8-1 A. INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................8-1 1. ISSUES.................................................................................................................................8-1 2. PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS...................................................................................................8-1 3. METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................................................8-2 4. MAXIMUM SHADOW STUDY AREA.....................................................................................8-3 5. CRITERIA AND REGULATIONS ............................................................................................8-3 6. DATA SOURCES ..................................................................................................................8-4 7. SCREENING AND DETAILED ANALYSIS METHODOLOGIES .................................................8-4 B. EXISTING CONDITIONS ....................................................................................................8-5 1. STUDY AREA ......................................................................................................................8-5 2. OTHER STUDY AREAS (CORONA YARD) ............................................................................8-5 3. OPEN SPACES – EXISTING CONDITIONS
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4: Social Conditions
    Chapter 4: Social Conditions A. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY This chapter addresses a variety of issues that support social conditions, including population and housing characteristics, community facilities and open spaces, and neighborhood character. The discussion of social conditions considers the entire MESA study area (depicted in Figure 3-1 in Chapter 3, above) with particular focus on the project corridor—the routes proposed for the various project alternatives—where the greatest potential for change would occur. Because none of the project alternatives have the potential to change social conditions in the secondary study area, where Build Alternatives 1 and 2 would add service along an existing subway line, this analysis is of the primary study area only. The analysis was conducted by first compiling existing data for population and housing, com- munity facilities and open spaces, and neighborhood character. The source for the population and housing data is the 1990 Census of Population and Housing. The inventory of community facilities is based on Community District Needs (1997) for Manhattan’s Community Boards, the Department of Parks and Recreation’s Property Lists (dated November 4, 1996), supplementary information provided by the various Community Boards within the study area, and the informa- tion gathered for the analysis of land use, zoning, and public policy in Chapter 3. The assessment of neighborhood character is based on information gathered for other chapters of this document, particularly including the analyses of land use (Chapter 3) and visual and aesthetic considerations (Chapter 6). After assessing the existing conditions in the study area, the expected changes in the future are considered, based on information compiled in Chapter 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Request for Proposals
    SOLICITATION# M86-SB 03/04 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR THE RENOVATION, OPERATION, AND MAINTENANCE OF AN OUTDOOR CAFÉ IN STUYVESANT SQUARE PARK MANHATTAN ISSUE DATE: MARCH 5, 2004 MICHAEL R. BLOOMBERG MAYOR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK ADRIAN BENEPE COMMISSIONER OF PARKS & RECREATION JOANNE G. IMOHIOSEN ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER FOR REVENUE WILLIAM T. CASTRO BOROUGH COMMISSIONER FOR MANHATTAN PARKS Request for Proposals Stuyvesant Square Outdoor Cafe Page 1 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) FOR THE RENOVATION, OPERATION, AND MAINTENANCE OF AN OUTDOOR CAFÉ IN STUYVESANT SQUARE PARK, MANHATTAN City of New York Parks & Recreation requests proposals for the renovation, operation, and maintenance of an outdoor café in Stuyvesant Square Park, Manhattan. The concession area will be in and around the vacant comfort station located in the southwest corner of the park, on the side of the park that is east of Second Avenue. Parks is seeking proposers with a solid background in the restaurant or food service business to design, renovate, operate, and maintain the facility. The food and service offered must be of high quality. Parks is seeking a concessionaire for a nine (9) year term. No longer term will be considered. This concession will be operated pursuant to a license issued by Parks; no leasehold or other proprietary right is offered. PROJECT MANAGER The City of New York Parks and Recreation Project Manager for this concession is Slater Gray. All RFP questions and/or inquiries should be directed to her. She may be reached at the Arsenal in Central Park at (212) 360-1397. You may also fax your questions to her at (212) 360-3428 or e-mail her at [email protected].
    [Show full text]