DOCSLIB.ORG

Language Model Adaptation Using Latent Dirichlet Allocation and an Efficient Topic Inference Algorithm

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Language Model Adaptation Using Latent Dirichlet Allocation and an Efficient Topic Inference Algorithm Language Model Adaptation Using Latent Dirichlet Allocation and an Efficient Topic Inference Algorithm Aaron Heidel1 , Hung-an Chang2 , and Lin-shan Lee1 1Dept. of Computer Science & Information Engineering, National Taiwan University Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China 2Spoken Language Systems Group, CSAIL, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA 02139, USA [email protected], hung [email protected], [email protected] Abstract Another well-known approach is the sentence-level We present an effort to perform topic mixture-based lan- mixture model, which used topics identified from a het- guage model adaptation using latent Dirichlet allocation erogenous training corpus by automatic clustering [4]. (LDA). We use probabilistic latent semantic analysis Improvements were demonstrated in both perplexity and (PLSA) to automatically cluster a heterogeneous training recognition accuracy over an unadapted trigram language corpus, and train an LDA model using the resultant topic- model. document assignments. Using this LDA model, we then construct topic-specific corpora at the utterance level for interpolation with a background language model during language model adaptation. We also present a novel it- In this paper, we propose an improved language model erative algorithm for LDA topic inference. Very encour- adaptation scheme that utilizes topic information obtained aging results were obtained in preliminary experiments from first-pass recognition results using a novel topic in- with broadcast news in Mandarin Chinese. ference algorithm for latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) Index Terms: language model, unsupervised adaptation, [5]. A mix of language models is constructed that best topic modeling, speech recognition models this topic information; that is, a set of signifi- cant topic-specific language models (topic LMs) is se- lected, and their corresponding weights when interpo- lated with a background LM are set. The resulting mix is then used to find an adapted hypothesis. The principle 1. Introduction difference between this and a recently proposed approach Statistical n-gram-based language models have long been [6] is that where they adapt the background LM according used to estimate probabilities for the next word given the to the LDA-inferred unigram distribution, the proposed preceding word history. Although they have proven to method decomposes the background LM into topic LMs work extremely well, researchers quickly noticed signs using utterance-level n-gram counts. In fact, the proposed that their performance improvements given increasingly method is different from all such approaches that directly large corpora were beginning to asymptote [1]. Many at- manipulate the background LM according to some uni- tempts, therefore, have been made to compensate for their gram distribution based on the adaptation text. This ap- most notable weakness: no consideration of long distance proach is also conceptually simpler than a recent work dependencies, or no understanding of semantics. using HMM-LDA [7], for example, in that no distinction One of the earliest such attempts introduced was the is made between syntactic and semantic states. cache-based technique, which took advantage of the gen- erally observed “burstiness” of words by increasing the probability of words in the history when predicting the next word [2]. This technique was then generalized using In the next section, we describe the LDA framework trigger pairs, in which the observation of certain “trig- for topic modeling and present the proposed inference al- ger” words increases the probability of seeing correlated gorithm, and in section 3 we outline the proposed lan- words; furthermore, a maximum entropy approach was guage modeling scheme. Experimental results are pre- used to combine the probability estimates of multiple trig- sented in section 4, and our concluding remarks follow in gers into a reasonable joint estimate [3]. section 5. the marginal probability p(w|α, β). Unfortunately, the integration in eq. 3 is intractable due to the coupling be- tween θ and w. Although a variational inference algo- rithm has been proposed to solve this problem [5], this algorithm still involves computationally expensive calcu- lations such as the digamma function. To make topic in- ference faster and more efficient, we here propose an iter- ative algorithm to find the most suitable topic mixture θˆ Figure 1: LDA topic sequence generation. The gray cir- for the set of words w under the mean square error (MSE) cles represent model parameters, while the white circles criterion. represent latent parameters. The probability p(w|α, β) in eq. 3 can be further interpreted as an expectation over θ: 2. Latent Dirichlet Allocation p(w|α, β) 2.1. LDA Model Representation " N !# Y X LDA [5] is a generative, probabilistic model character- = Eθ p(zn|θ)p(wn|zn, β) . (4) ized by the two sets of parameters α and β, where α = n=1 zn [α1α2 ··· αk] represents the Dirichlet parameters for the Under the MSE criterion, the most suitable mixture θˆ is k latent topics of the model, and β is a k × V matrix the one that makes the probability of w equal to the ex- where each entry βij represents the unigram probability pectation in eq. 4. That is, θˆ is chosen such that of the jth word in the V -word vocabulary under the ith latent topic. N ! Y X ˆ Under the LDA modeling framework, the generative p(zn|θ)p(wn|zn, β) = process for a document of N words can be summarized as n=1 zn " N !# follows. A vector for the topic mixture θ = [θ1θ2 ··· θk] Y X is first drawn from the Dirichlet distribution with proba- Eθ p(zn|θ)p(wn|zn, β) . (5) bility n=1 zn Because the Dirichlet distribution is continuous, we are Pk Γ i=1 αi guaranteed that such a θˆ exists. Hence, we can calculate p(θ|α) = θα1−1 ··· θαk−1, (1) Qk 1 k θˆ using the following iteration. Γ(αi) i=1 First, we set the initial vector according to the prior where Γ(x) denotes the gamma function. Then, a topic information such that sequence z = [z1z2 ··· zN ] is generated multinomially [0] α1 α2 αk by θ with p(zn = i|θ) = θi. Finally, each word wn is θ = ··· , (6) αsum αsum αsum chosen according to the probability p(wn|zn, β), which is equal to βij, where zn = i and wn is the jth word in Pk where αsum = i=1 αi and αi/αsum = E[θi|α]. Let the vocabulary. Figure 1 shows the generative process. θ[t] denote the mixture after t iterations. The posterior θ N The joint distribution of a topic mixture , a set of probability λ that word w is drawn from topic i can z N w ni n topics , and a set of words can thus be calculated be derived by by θ[t]β N λ = i iwn , (7) Y ni Pk [t] p(θ, z, w|α, β) = p(θ|α) p(zn|θ)p(wn|zn, β). j=1 θj βjwn n=1 (2) [t] [t] where θi βiwn = p(zn = i | θ )p(wn|zn, β). Because Integrating over θ and summing over z, we obtain the each word is an independent and equally reliable obser- marginal distribution of w: vation under the LDA model, the posterior probability of each word has equal weight in determining the topic mix- p(w|α, β) = (3) ture. Thus, the new vector θ[t+1] can be calculated by N !! Z Y X p(θ|α) p(zn|θ)p(wn|zn, β) dθ. N [t+1] 1 X z θ = λ . (8) n=1 n i N ni n=1 2.2. LDA Topic Inference The iteration is continued until the mixture vector con- We now illustrate how to infer the topic mixture θ given a verges, resulting in the most suitable topic mixture for set of words w. The inference requires the calculation of the word sequence w. Figure 3: Perplexity given background model weight CB when combined with top topic model. Figure 2: Perplexity for LDA-derived LM given topic mix size m. ‘B’ stands for the background trigram LM; 22 and 64 are topic counts; ‘h’ and ‘P’ stand for human- and PLSA-initiated; and ‘utterance’ and ‘story’ indicate per-utterance and per-story perplexities, respectively. Figure 4: Optimal background Figure 5: Optimal background model weight CB given top model weight CB given topic topic mixture weight θi. mix size m. 3. Language Modeling 3.1. Topic Corpus Construction and LM Training Since LDA requires labelled training data, we first use PLSA 4.1. Topic LM Mixture Size Experiments to identify k latent topics in our training corpus. Given these The results of our initial experiments are shown in Figure 2. topic labels, we train our LDA model, after which we proceed Here a random set of 6000 and 5000 utterances was respec- to assign each individual utterance in the training corpus to one tively selected from the training and testing corpora for per- of k topic corpora as follows: for each utterance, we infer the plexity evaluation. The experiment was conducted as follows: θ topic mixture from which we choose the topic with the max- for each utterance u, the LDA topic mixture θu was inferred imum weight, and append the utterance to this topic’s corpus. and then per-utterance perplexity was calculated for interpo- We then use the resulting k topic-specific corpora to train each lated mixtures of the the top m topics’ language models, from topic’s trigram language model (the background trigram lan- m = 1 to m = 5. In these experiments, the background tri- guage model is trained on the entire training corpus). In our gram LM was not included in the mixtures.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Automatic Correction of Real-Word Errors in Spanish Clinical Texts
    sensors Article Automatic Correction of Real-Word Errors in Spanish Clinical Texts Daniel Bravo-Candel 1,Jésica López-Hernández 1, José Antonio García-Díaz 1 , Fernando Molina-Molina 2 and Francisco García-Sánchez 1,* 1 Department of Informatics and Systems, Faculty of Computer Science, Campus de Espinardo, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain; [email protected] (D.B.-C.); [email protected] (J.L.-H.); [email protected] (J.A.G.-D.) 2 VÓCALI Sistemas Inteligentes S.L., 30100 Murcia, Spain; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-86888-8107 Abstract: Real-word errors are characterized by being actual terms in the dictionary. By providing context, real-word errors are detected. Traditional methods to detect and correct such errors are mostly based on counting the frequency of short word sequences in a corpus. Then, the probability of a word being a real-word error is computed. On the other hand, state-of-the-art approaches make use of deep learning models to learn context by extracting semantic features from text. In this work, a deep learning model were implemented for correcting real-word errors in clinical text. Specifically, a Seq2seq Neural Machine Translation Model mapped erroneous sentences to correct them. For that, different types of error were generated in correct sentences by using rules. Different Seq2seq models were trained and evaluated on two corpora: the Wikicorpus and a collection of three clinical datasets. The medicine corpus was much smaller than the Wikicorpus due to privacy issues when dealing Citation: Bravo-Candel, D.; López-Hernández, J.; García-Díaz, with patient information.
    [Show full text]
  • Unified Language Model Pre-Training for Natural
    Unified Language Model Pre-training for Natural Language Understanding and Generation Li Dong∗ Nan Yang∗ Wenhui Wang∗ Furu Wei∗† Xiaodong Liu Yu Wang Jianfeng Gao Ming Zhou Hsiao-Wuen Hon Microsoft Research {lidong1,nanya,wenwan,fuwei}@microsoft.com {xiaodl,yuwan,jfgao,mingzhou,hon}@microsoft.com Abstract This paper presents a new UNIfied pre-trained Language Model (UNILM) that can be fine-tuned for both natural language understanding and generation tasks. The model is pre-trained using three types of language modeling tasks: unidirec- tional, bidirectional, and sequence-to-sequence prediction. The unified modeling is achieved by employing a shared Transformer network and utilizing specific self-attention masks to control what context the prediction conditions on. UNILM compares favorably with BERT on the GLUE benchmark, and the SQuAD 2.0 and CoQA question answering tasks. Moreover, UNILM achieves new state-of- the-art results on five natural language generation datasets, including improving the CNN/DailyMail abstractive summarization ROUGE-L to 40.51 (2.04 absolute improvement), the Gigaword abstractive summarization ROUGE-L to 35.75 (0.86 absolute improvement), the CoQA generative question answering F1 score to 82.5 (37.1 absolute improvement), the SQuAD question generation BLEU-4 to 22.12 (3.75 absolute improvement), and the DSTC7 document-grounded dialog response generation NIST-4 to 2.67 (human performance is 2.65). The code and pre-trained models are available at https://github.com/microsoft/unilm. 1 Introduction Language model (LM) pre-training has substantially advanced the state of the art across a variety of natural language processing tasks [8, 29, 19, 31, 9, 1].
    [Show full text]
  • Analyzing Political Polarization in News Media with Natural Language Processing
    Analyzing Political Polarization in News Media with Natural Language Processing by Brian Sharber A thesis presented to the Honors College of Middle Tennessee State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation from the University Honors College Fall 2020 Analyzing Political Polarization in News Media with Natural Language Processing by Brian Sharber APPROVED: ______________________________ Dr. Salvador E. Barbosa Project Advisor Computer Science Department Dr. Medha Sarkar Computer Science Department Chair ____________________________ Dr. John R. Vile, Dean University Honors College Copyright © 2020 Brian Sharber Department of Computer Science Middle Tennessee State University; Murfreesboro, Tennessee, USA. I hereby grant to Middle Tennessee State University (MTSU) and its agents (including an institutional repository) the non-exclusive right to archive, preserve, and make accessible my thesis in whole or in part in all forms of media now and hereafter. I warrant that the thesis and the abstract are my original work and do not infringe or violate any rights of others. I agree to indemnify and hold MTSU harmless for any damage which may result from copyright infringement or similar claims brought against MTSU by third parties. I retain all ownership rights to the copyright of my thesis. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis. The software described in this work is free software. You can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the MIT License. The software is posted on GitHub under the following repository: https://github.com/briansha/NLP-Political-Polarization iii Abstract Political discourse in the United States is becoming increasingly polarized.
    [Show full text]
  • Automatic Spelling Correction Based on N-Gram Model
    International Journal of Computer Applications (0975 – 8887) Volume 182 – No. 11, August 2018 Automatic Spelling Correction based on n-Gram Model S. M. El Atawy A. Abd ElGhany Dept. of Computer Science Dept. of Computer Faculty of Specific Education Damietta University Damietta University, Egypt Egypt ABSTRACT correction. In this paper, we are designed, implemented and A spell checker is a basic requirement for any language to be evaluated an end-to-end system that performs spellchecking digitized. It is a software that detects and corrects errors in a and auto correction. particular language. This paper proposes a model to spell error This paper is organized as follows: Section 2 illustrates types detection and auto-correction that is based on n-gram of spelling error and some of related works. Section 3 technique and it is applied in error detection and correction in explains the system description. Section 4 presents the results English as a global language. The proposed model provides and evaluation. Finally, Section 5 includes conclusion and correction suggestions by selecting the most suitable future work. suggestions from a list of corrective suggestions based on lexical resources and n-gram statistics. It depends on a 2. RELATED WORKS lexicon of Microsoft words. The evaluation of the proposed Spell checking techniques have been substantially, such as model uses English standard datasets of misspelled words. error detection & correction. Two commonly approaches for Error detection, automatic error correction, and replacement error detection are dictionary lookup and n-gram analysis. are the main features of the proposed model. The results of the Most spell checkers methods described in the literature, use experiment reached approximately 93% of accuracy and acted dictionaries as a list of correct spellings that help algorithms similarly to Microsoft Word as well as outperformed both of to find target words [16].
    [Show full text]
  • N-Gram-Based Machine Translation
    N-gram-based Machine Translation ∗ JoseB.Mari´ no˜ ∗ Rafael E. Banchs ∗ Josep M. Crego ∗ Adria` de Gispert ∗ Patrik Lambert ∗ Jose´ A. R. Fonollosa ∗ Marta R. Costa-jussa` Universitat Politecnica` de Catalunya This article describes in detail an n-gram approach to statistical machine translation. This ap- proach consists of a log-linear combination of a translation model based on n-grams of bilingual units, which are referred to as tuples, along with four specific feature functions. Translation performance, which happens to be in the state of the art, is demonstrated with Spanish-to-English and English-to-Spanish translations of the European Parliament Plenary Sessions (EPPS). 1. Introduction The beginnings of statistical machine translation (SMT) can be traced back to the early fifties, closely related to the ideas from which information theory arose (Shannon and Weaver 1949) and inspired by works on cryptography (Shannon 1949, 1951) during World War II. According to this view, machine translation was conceived as the problem of finding a sentence by decoding a given “encrypted” version of it (Weaver 1955). Although the idea seemed very feasible, enthusiasm faded shortly afterward because of the computational limitations of the time (Hutchins 1986). Finally, during the nineties, two factors made it possible for SMT to become an actual and practical technology: first, significant increment in both the computational power and storage capacity of computers, and second, the availability of large volumes of bilingual data. The first SMT systems were developed in the early nineties (Brown et al. 1990, 1993). These systems were based on the so-called noisy channel approach, which models the probability of a target language sentence T given a source language sentence S as the product of a translation-model probability p(S|T), which accounts for adequacy of trans- lation contents, times a target language probability p(T), which accounts for fluency of target constructions.
    [Show full text]
  • Spell Checker in CET Designer
    Linköping University | Department of Computer Science Bachelor thesis, 16 ECTS | Datateknik 2016 | LIU-IDA/LITH-EX-G--16/069--SE Spell checker in CET Designer Rasmus Hedin Supervisor : Amir Aminifar Examiner : Zebo Peng Linköpings universitet SE–581 83 Linköping +46 13 28 10 00 , www.liu.se Upphovsrätt Detta dokument hålls tillgängligt på Internet – eller dess framtida ersättare – under 25 år från publiceringsdatum under förutsättning att inga extraordinära omständigheter uppstår. Tillgång till dokumentet innebär tillstånd för var och en att läsa, ladda ner, skriva ut enstaka kopior för enskilt bruk och att använda det oförändrat för ickekommersiell forskning och för undervisning. Överföring av upphovsrätten vid en senare tidpunkt kan inte upphäva detta tillstånd. All annan användning av dokumentet kräver upphovsmannens medgivande. För att garantera äktheten, säkerheten och tillgängligheten finns lösningar av teknisk och admin- istrativ art. Upphovsmannens ideella rätt innefattar rätt att bli nämnd som upphovsman i den omfattning som god sed kräver vid användning av dokumentet på ovan beskrivna sätt samt skydd mot att dokumentet ändras eller presenteras i sådan form eller i sådant sam- manhang som är kränkande för upphovsmannenslitterära eller konstnärliga anseende eller egenart. För ytterligare information om Linköping University Electronic Press se förlagets hemsida http://www.ep.liu.se/. Copyright The publishers will keep this document online on the Internet – or its possible replacement – for a period of 25 years starting from the date of publication barring exceptional circum- stances. The online availability of the document implies permanent permission for anyone to read, to download, or to print out single copies for his/hers own use and to use it unchanged for non-commercial research and educational purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • Automatic Extraction of Personal Events from Dialogue
    Automatic extraction of personal events from dialogue Joshua D. Eisenberg Michael Sheriff Artie, Inc. Florida International University 601 W 5th St, Los Angeles, CA 90071 Department of Creative Writing [email protected] 11101 S.W. 13 ST., Miami, FL 33199 [email protected] Abstract language. The most popular corpora annotated In this paper we introduce the problem of ex- for events all come from the domain of newswire tracting events from dialogue. Previous work (Pustejovsky et al., 2003b; Minard et al., 2016). on event extraction focused on newswire, how- Our work begins to fill that gap. We have open ever we are interested in extracting events sourced the gold-standard annotated corpus of from spoken dialogue. To ground this study, events from dialogue.1 For brevity, we will hearby we annotated dialogue transcripts from four- refer to this corpus as the Personal Events in Di- teen episodes of the podcast This American alogue Corpus (PEDC). We detailed the feature Life. This corpus contains 1,038 utterances, made up of 16,962 tokens, of which 3,664 rep- extraction pipelines, and the support vector ma- resent events. The agreement for this corpus chine (SVM) learning protocols for the automatic has a Cohen’s κ of 0.83. We have open sourced extraction of events from dialogue. Using this in- this corpus for the NLP community. With this formation, as well as the corpus we have released, corpus in hand, we trained support vector ma- anyone interested in extracting events from dia- chines (SVM) to correctly classify these phe- logue can proceed where we have left off.
    [Show full text]
  • Deep Learning for Web Search and Natural Language Processing
    Deep Learning for Web Search and Natural Language Processing Jianfeng Gao Deep Learning Technology Center (DLTC) Microsoft Research, Redmond, USA WSDM 2015, Shanghai, China *Thank Li Deng and Xiaodong He, with whom we participated in the previous ICASSP2014 and CIKM2014 versions of this tutorial Mission of Machine (Deep) Learning Data (collected/labeled) Model (architecture) Training (algorithm) 2 Outline • The basics • Background of deep learning • A query classification problem • A single neuron model • A deep neural network (DNN) model • Potentials and problems of DNN • The breakthrough after 2006 • Deep Semantic Similarity Models (DSSM) for text processing • Recurrent Neural Networks 3 4 Scientists See Promise in Deep-Learning Programs John Markoff November 23, 2012 Rick Rashid in Tianjin, China, October, 25, 2012 Geoff Hinton The universal translator on A voice recognition program translated a speech given by Richard F. “Star Trek” comes true… Rashid, Microsoft’s top scientist, into Chinese. 5 6 Impact of deep learning in speech technology Cortana 7 8 A query classification problem • Given a search query 푞, e.g., “denver sushi downtown” • Identify its domain 푐 e.g., • Restaurant • Hotel • Nightlife • Flight • etc. • So that a search engine can tailor the interface and result to provide a richer personalized user experience 9 A single neuron model • For each domain 푐, build a binary classifier 푇 • Input: represent a query 푞 as a vector of features 푥 = [푥1, … 푥푛] • Output: 푦 = 푃 푐 푞 • 푞 is labeled 푐 is 푃 푐 푞 > 0.5 • Input feature vector,
    [Show full text]
  • Training Automatic Transliteration Models on Dbpedia Data
    Training Automatic Transliteration Models on DBpedia Data Velislava Todorova Kiril Simov Linguistic Modeling Department Linguistic Modeling Department IICT-BAS IICT-BAS [email protected] [email protected] Abstract provide access to all RDF statements about the original URIs. Our goal is to facilitate named en- The paper presents several transliteration tity recognition in Bulgarian texts by models and their evaluation. Their evaluation extending the coverage of DBpedia is done over 100 examples, transliterated man- (http://www.dbpedia.org/) for Bul- ually by two people, independently from each garian. For this task we have trained other. The discrepancies between the two hu- translation Moses models to transliter- man transliterations demonstrate the complex- ate foreign names to Bulgarian. The ity of the task. training sets were obtained by extract- The structure of the paper is as follows: in ing the names of all people, places section 2 we describe the problem in more de- and organizations from DBpedia and tail; in section 3 we present some related ap- its extension Airpedia (http://www. proaches; section 4 reports on the preliminary airpedia.org/). Our approach is ex- experiments; section 5 describes how the train- tendable to other languages with small ing data is extended on the basis of the results DBpedia coverage. from the preliminary models and new models are trained; section 6 provides some heuristic 1 Introduction rules for combining transliteration and trans- lation of names’ parts; section 7 describes the 1 DBpedia Linked Open Dataset provides the evaluation of the models; the last section con- wealth of Wikipedia in a formalized way via cludes the paper and presents some directions the ontological language in which DBpedia for future work.
    [Show full text]
  • Heafield, K. and A. Lavie. "Voting on N-Grams for Machine Translation
    Voting on N-grams for Machine Translation System Combination Kenneth Heafield and Alon Lavie Language Technologies Institute Carnegie Mellon University 5000 Forbes Avenue Pittsburgh, PA 15213 fheafield,[email protected] Abstract by a single weight and further current features only guide decisions at the word level. To remedy this System combination exploits differences be- situation, we propose new features that account for tween machine translation systems to form a multiword behavior, each with a separate set of sys- combined translation from several system out- tem weights. puts. Core to this process are features that reward n-gram matches between a candidate 2 Features combination and each system output. Systems differ in performance at the n-gram level de- Most combination schemes generate many hypothe- spite similar overall scores. We therefore ad- sis combinations, score them using a battery of fea- vocate a new feature formulation: for each tures, and search for a hypothesis with highest score system and each small n, a feature counts to output. Formally, the system generates hypoth- n-gram matches between the system and can- esis h, evaluates feature function f, and multiplies didate. We show post-evaluation improvement of 6.67 BLEU over the best system on NIST linear weight vector λ by feature vector f(h) to ob- T MT09 Arabic-English test data. Compared to tain score λ f(h). The score is used to rank fi- a baseline system combination scheme from nal hypotheses and to prune partial hypotheses dur- WMT 2009, we show improvement in the ing beam search. The beams contain hypotheses of range of 1 BLEU point.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the 55Th Annual Meeting of the Association For
    ComputEL-3 Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on the Use of Computational Methods in the Study of Endangered Languages Volume 1 (Papers) February 26–27, 2019 Honolulu, Hawai‘i, USA Support: c 2019 The Association for Computational Linguistics Order copies of this and other ACL proceedings from: Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) 209 N. Eighth Street Stroudsburg, PA 18360 USA Tel: +1-570-476-8006 Fax: +1-570-476-0860 [email protected] ISBN 978-1-950737-18-5 ii Preface These proceedings contain the papers presented at the 3rd Workshop on the Use of Computational Methods in the Study of Endangered languages held in Hawai’i at Manoa,¯ February 26–27, 2019. As the name implies, this is the third workshop held on the topic—the first meeting was co-located with the ACL main conference in Baltimore, Maryland in 2014 and the second one in 2017 was co-located with the 5th International Conference on Language Documentation and Conservation (ICLDC) at the University of Hawai‘i at Manoa.¯ The workshop covers a wide range of topics relevant to the study and documentation of endangered languages, ranging from technical papers on working systems and applications, to reports on community activities with supporting computational components. The purpose of the workshop is to bring together computational researchers, documentary linguists, and people involved with community efforts of language documentation and revitalization to take part in both formal and informal exchanges on how to integrate rapidly evolving language processing methods and tools into efforts of language description, documentation, and revitalization. The organizers are pleased with the range of papers, many of which highlight the importance of interdisciplinary work and interaction between the various communities that the workshop is aimed towards.
    [Show full text]
  • Phrase-Based Attentions
    Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2019 PHRASE-BASED ATTENTIONS Phi Xuan Nguyen, Shafiq Joty Nanyang Technological University, Singapore [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT Most state-of-the-art neural machine translation systems, despite being different in architectural skeletons (e.g., recurrence, convolutional), share an indispensable feature: the Attention. However, most existing attention methods are token-based and ignore the importance of phrasal alignments, the key ingredient for the suc- cess of phrase-based statistical machine translation. In this paper, we propose novel phrase-based attention methods to model n-grams of tokens as attention entities. We incorporate our phrase-based attentions into the recently proposed Transformer network, and demonstrate that our approach yields improvements of 1.3 BLEU for English-to-German and 0.5 BLEU for German-to-English transla- tion tasks on WMT newstest2014 using WMT’16 training data. 1 INTRODUCTION Neural Machine Translation (NMT) has established breakthroughs in many different translation tasks, and has quickly become the standard approach to machine translation. NMT offers a sim- ple encoder-decoder architecture that is trained end-to-end. Most NMT models (except a few like (Kaiser & Bengio, 2016) and (Huang et al., 2018)) possess attention mechanisms to perform align- ments of the target tokens to the source tokens. The attention module plays a role analogous to the word alignment model in Statistical Machine Translation or SMT (Koehn, 2010). In fact, the trans- former network introduced recently by Vaswani et al. (2017) achieves state-of-the-art performance in both speed and BLEU scores (Papineni et al., 2002) by using only attention modules.
    [Show full text]