Hasted's Kent Maidstone in 1798
Hasted’s Kent Maidstone in 1798 Edward Hasted, The history and topographical survey of the county of Kent, second edition, volume 4 (Canterbury, 1798), pages 260–324 THE TOWN AND PARISH OF MAIDSTONE. SOUTH-WESTWARD from Gillingham, the parish of Boxley only intervening, lies the parish and town of Maidstone, concerning the antient name of which writers have greatly differed. Nennius, in his catalogue of the cities of Britain, tells us, this place was called by the Britons, Caer Meguiad, or as others have it, Megwad, no doubt corruptly for Medwag. Camden,/a Burton,/b Gale, and some few other historians, have supposed it to have been the Roman station, called by Antonine in his Itinerary, Vagniacæ; a name taken from the river here, at that time called Vaga; for this purpose they read the distances of the second iter of Antonine, A Vallo ad portum Ritupis, as follows: A Londinio, No= viomago, M. P. X. Vagniacis, M. P. XVIII. Durobrovis, M. P. IX. If this place was the Vagniacæ of the Ro= mans, and the above numbers are right, it is situated much about the above distance from Keston, and not quite so much from Crayford, both which have been conjectured to have been the antient Noviomagus; the distance of it from Durobrovis, or Rochester, will an= swer tolerably well. The word Vagniacæ, is supposed, by a learned etymologist,/c to have been corruptly written in the Itinerary for Maduicœ, which is the same as Med-wæge in the Saxon, and MadÃijogÃijisc in the British tongue; hence in process of time it came to be called Madis and ad Madum,/d the river being cal= led Mada and Madus.
[Show full text]