I've Seen References That Say Your Mother, When
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Film Dada Cinema of the Bearded Heart
Film Dada Cinema of the Bearded Heart Friday, January 26, 2018 Base: Experimental Arts + Space (Seattle) Saturday, January 27, 2018 The Church House (Bellingham) The Sprocket Society Seattle, WA ¿Dada? “If you must speak of Dada you must speak of “The realization that reason and anti-reason, sense Dada. If you must not speak of Dada you must still and nonsense, design and chance, consciousness speak of Dada.” and unconsciousness, belong together as necessary Jean Paulhan parts of a whole – this was the central message of Dada.” “Dada was a bomb. We, the Dadaists, exploded Hans Richter this bomb. The fragments have scattered across the world. What are the museums doing? They are “Madness and murder were rampant when Dada in trying to reassemble these fragments to exhibit to the year 1916 rose out of the primordial depths in the public as relics.” Zurich. The people who were not directly involved Max Ernst in the monstrous madness behaved as if they did not understand what was going on around them. “Dada was the beginning of the revolution of the Like stray lambs they looked out into the world suppressed personality against technology, mass with glassy eyes. Dada wanted to frighten mankind media, and the feeling of being lost in an ocean of out of its pitiful impotence. Dada abominated business cleverness.” resignation. To speak only of Dada’s confusing Richard Huelsenbeck unreality and fail to penetrate its transcendent reality, is to render only a worthless fragment of Dada. Dada was not a farce.” Hans Arp “Dada is our intensity: it sets up inconsequential bayonets the sumatran head of the german baby: Dada is life without carpet-slippers or parallels; it is for and against unity and definitely against the future: we are wise enough to know that our brains will become downy pillows that our anti-dogmatism is as exclusivist as a bureaucrat that we are not free yet to shout freedom— A harsh necessity without discipline or morality and we spit on humanity. -
Dudley Murphy INTRODUCTION
00front.qxd 7/31/2006 7:53 AM Page ix at the edge of the frame n January , two years before he died, Dudley Murphy sat down to recollect his life. Most likely he spoke his thoughts into a tape I recorder; the resulting manuscript has a conversational air and not much structure. Typos and misspellings imply a transcriber with little knowledge of film history, art, or French—all of which, as it happens, are essential to his story. It’s a life that reads like a picaresque novel interspersed with movies. “I feel I have been so fortunate to have been in what I call the creative cen- ters of the world at the right time,” he wrote.1 And he was. He moved effortlessly from Greenwich Village bohemia to avant-garde Paris, the Harlem Renaissance, Hollywood, and beyond. Tall, blond, and charming, he was a cheerfully wide-ranging philanderer with little thought for the consequences. For him, scrapes and scandals were normal background noise, from courtroom dramas to love-crazed divorcées. Looking back on his life, mad and gay (in the giddy, nonsexual sense of the term) were among his favorite adjectives. As a filmmaker, Murphy was something of a provocateur—erratic, messy, even irritating, but an envelope pusher nonetheless. Impulsive and extemporaneous, he alternated between industry insider and outsider, play- ing both roles with zeal if not always finesse. At a time when the classical Hollywood film form was rapidly solidifying, he determinedly pursued a looser, more evocative style. As mainstream moviemaking was straitened by an increasingly narrative approach, Murphy envisioned a different kind of cinema—turning out, among other things, the equivalent of modern ix 00front.qxd 7/31/2006 7:53 AM Page x x Introduction music videos in an obscure technology that lasted barely three years. -
Bette Davis Was Already a Success in the Movies
Posted at www.winchester.us/480/Winchester-History-Online Follow the link to read the article in context and learn about the project. GOING HOLLYWOOD By Ellen Knight1 In 1936, a member of Winchester High School’s latest graduating class made the headlines for having a role in a Hollywood movie. That summer a group of Winchester residents became extras in a “March of Time” documentary. But anyone wanting to see these people at the movies had to go out of town, since Winchester did not have a moving picture theater. For about three decades Winchester residents fought for and against licensing a movie theater in town. At the same time, several of its young people, who not only wanted to see movies but also be in them, were heading off to Hollywood and New York to try to break into show business and the movies. Though the struggle to get a movie theater in Winchester was long and contentious, in 1936 Winchester was finally on its way One of the movie theater to having its first movie house when the Board of Selectmen proposals which failed granted the first license to show moving pictures to the E. M. Loew chain. By that time, former Winchester resident Bette Davis was already a success in the movies. Winchester’s Dudley Murphy was out in Hollywood, too, directing films. Then, in February 1936, Winchester’s Martha Tibbetts made the news for having a supporting role in Howard Hawks’ Ceiling Zero. Whatever side one took on the movie theater controversy, everyone acknowledged that there were good films out there, and it was always newsworthy when a local went Hollywood. -
Strubbelingen Rond Een Kopie BALLET MÉCANIQUE
William Moritz Strubbelingen rond een kopie BALLET MÉCANIQUE [Net werkzaam bij het Nederlands Filmmuseum werd mijn aandacht getrokken door een schrijven van de 'erfgenamen' van de schilder Fer- nand Léger aan het Filmmuseum. Zij hadden bezwaar tegen een 'ge- kleurde kopie' van BALLET MECANIQUE die het Filmmuseum bezit. Ik herinnerde mij dat ik enkele maanden tevoren, tijdens een gesprek met de Amerikaanse deskundige op het gebied van experimentele films, dr. William Moritz, terloops gesproken had over een gekleurde versie van deze film. Om meer duidelijkheid over deze zaak te krijgen, schreef ik Moritz een brief en kreeg een lang antwoord terug. Daaruit blijkt - weer eens - hoe ingewikkeld ook het film-filologische werk is! Dat bovendien vaak niet erg vergemakkelijkt wordt door - al dan niet ver- antwoorde - onwelwillendheid van instellingen en individuen. Met toestemming van William Moritz wordt zijn brief hieronder integraal afgedrukt. Bijgevoegd - maar hier niet afgedrukt - waren fotokopieën van J. Freeman, 'Léger Reexamined': W.J. Reilly, 'When is It an Moving Picture?' en handgeschreven aantekening met betrek- king tot een shot-list van Moritz zelf. - Eric de Kuyper] Feb. 21, 1988 Dear Eric, I am quite surprised that 'heirs' ofLéger (whoever they may be) would question the validity or integrity ofyour tinted print of BALLET MECA- NIQUE. I think that there is no question about its authenticity, and no question possible that several tinted prints came from the hands of Lé- ger himself. In Judi Freeman's article 'Léger Reexamined' (Art History, vol. 7, no. 3, September 1984)~which is the best published text about BALLET MECANIQUE that I know, she shows, p.