Arxiv:2105.11481V1 [Astro-Ph.CO] 24 May 2021

Ultrahigh-energy Gamma Rays and Gravitational Waves from Primordial Exotic Stellar Bubbles

Yi-Fu Cai,1, 2, 3, ∗ Chao Chen,1, 2, 3, † Qianhang Ding,4, 5, ‡ and Yi Wang4, 5, § 1Department of Astronomy, School of Physical Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, China 2School of Astronomy and Space Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, China 3CAS Key Laboratory for Research in Galaxies and Cosmology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, China 4Department of Physics, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong, P.R.China 5Jockey Club Institute for Advanced Study, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong, P.R.China We put forward a novel class of exotic celestial objects that can be produced through phase transitions occurred in the primordial Universe. These objects appear as bubbles of stellar sizes and can be dominated by primordial black holes (PBHs). We report that, due to the processes of Hawking radiation and binary evolution of PBHs inside these stellar bubbles, both electromagnetic and gravitational radiations can be emitted that are featured on the gamma-ray spectra and stochastic gravitational waves (GWs). Our results reveal that, depending on the mass distribution, the exotic stellar bubbles consisting of PBHs provide not only a decent ﬁt for the ultrahigh-energy gamma-ray spectrum reported by the recent LHAASO experiment, but also predict GW signals that are expected to be tested by the forthcoming GW surveys.

Introduction – With dramatic developments of obser- These objects appear as bubbles of stellar sizes and can vational technologies, a large number of new phenomena emit gamma rays and GWs through the processes of have been discovered in various astronomical experiments Hawking radiation and binary mergers, respectively. The- in the past decade. Our understanding of the very nature oretically, these stellar bubbles can be generated from of Universe, especially of the exotic astrophysical objects some new-physics phenomena that might have occurred including black holes, supernovae, neutrons, blazars, dark in the primordial Universe, such as, quantum tunnelings matter (DM) and active galactic nuclei, has been greatly during or after inflation [12, 13], multi-stream inflation developed. Specifically, the high-energy gamma-ray ob- [14], inhomogeneous baryogenesis [15], etc. In these cases, servations provide the only available probe to identify before the bubble-wall tension vanishes, the field values cosmic-ray sources which could tell us the unique infor- are different between inside and outside of the bubble. mation about the exotic celestial objects, as gamma rays Such difference can result in different local physics in- travel straightly from the source without the deflection by side the bubble, namely the production rate of the exotic galactic magnetic field [1, 2]. However, many of cosmic-ray species of matter illustrated below, which indicates the sources have physical origins that are still under discussion existence of the “island universes”, as a baby version of a [3,4]. multiverse. If the sizes of these bubbles are small enough, say, smaller than the resolution of current telescopes, they Also, accumulated gravitational wave (GW) events de- behave as exotic celestial objects. tected by the LIGO/Virgo Collaboration started a new era in the observational astronomy, that shed light on the Observational consequence of exotic stellar bubbles can formation of exotic astrophysical objects [5], and have arise from: (i) Decay, annihilation or interaction of exotic been used to test general relativity in the unexplored matter inside the bubble, for example, unstable particles, strong gravity regime [6]. Hence, the development of the textures, monopoles, cosmic strings, domain walls, and multi-messenger observation, which is a joint observa- arXiv:2105.11481v1 [astro-ph.CO] 24 May 2021 PBHs, etc, that can yield cosmic rays at high energy tion of cosmic rays, neutrinos, photons and GWs, could scales and hence may address the puzzle of ultrahigh- provide us the unique insights into the properties of astro- energy cosmic rays, such as PeV gamma rays discovered physical sources and source populations in our Universe in the recent LHAASO observation [16]; (ii) Interaction [7]. With the multi-messenger observation, there is a at the interface of the bubble, for example, if the stellar growing interest in searching for exotic celestial bodies, bubble is made of antimatter, where the effects can be such as quark stars [8], boson stars [9], dark stars [10] and in analogy to [11]. If there are overdense regions inside antistar [11], etc. Their search can reveal new aspects the bubble, certain amount of PBHs can be formed due of fundamental science and serve as new probes into the to the local gravitational collapse [17–19], resulting in primordial Universe. a wide range of PBH masses which is quite different In this Letter, we propose a novel class of exotic ce- from the astrophysical black holes [20–22]. When these lestial objects filled by primordial black holes (PBHs). PBHs’ masses are small enough, their Hawking radiations 2 become significant to generate observable electromagnetic Experiment Telescope (EGRET) for 20 MeV ∼ 30 GeV (EM) signals. Additionally, PBHs can also cluster to [36], the Fermi Large Area Telescope (Fermi LAT) for form binaries and generate GWs from their mergers [23, 20 MeV ∼ 300 GeV [37], PBHs within the mass range 24]. As such, it is expected to search for the nontrivial 1014 ∼ 1016 g are severely constrained and cannot provide observational signals from these exotic celestial bodies, as the dominant contribution to DM [27, 38, 39]. Moreover, we will investigate in this Letter. the galactic gamma-ray background [33] and gamma-ray EM radiations – In [25, 26] Hawking found remarkably bursts [40, 41] can be applied to constrain PBHs. that black holes emit radiations in the black-body form. Now, we study the EM signals from a single PBH This mechanism can be applied into PBHs that were stellar bubble and the possibility of their detection by formed in the very early Universe [27]. Theoretically, the high-energy gamma-ray experiments. We mention that PBHs satisfy a certain mass distribution depending on the multiple bubbles can be considered as independent single underlying generation mechanisms [28–31], and hence one bubble events for observations. Consider a PBH stellar can derive the EM radiations contributed by all possible bubble located at redshift z, with an initial lognormal mass scales. Let us focus our interest on neutral PBHs mass distribution (2). The key EM observable is the 2 2 of the Schwarzschild type. The time-dependent physical photon flux detected on Earth F (E,˜ t) ≡ E˜ d n˜γ /dE˜dt, number density ni of elementary particle i emitted by a where E˜ and n˜γ are the photon energy and number density distribution of PBHs per unit time and per unit energy observed on Earth. This observed photon flux is related can be determined by to the intrinsic luminosity L(E, z) of Hawking radiation from the PBH bubble located at z via d2n Z Mmax d2N i (E) = i (E,M)n (M)dM, (1) dtdE dtdE PBH L(E, z) Mmin F (E, z) = 2 , (3) 4πdL(z) where d2N /dtdE is the Hawking instantaneous emission i where L(E, z) is determined by the emitted photon phys- rate for particle i. The lower mass limit M is usually min ical number density per unit energy and per unit time set to the Planck mass M ' 2 × 10−5 g, while the upper pl d2n /dtdE. It can be numerically computed as shown one M can be infinity. γ max in the upper left panel of Fig.1 for the peak masses In general, the mass distribution of PBHs can be M = 1013, 1015, 1017g and the energies of emitted pho- described by the differential physical mass function pk tons E = 10, 100GeV, respectively. The flat parts in this n (M) ≡ dn /dM, where dn is the physical PBH PBH PBH panel are caused by small masses radiating at the early number density of PBHs in the mass range (M,M + dM). stage of Hawking radiation. The luminosity distance in For heavy PBHs which survive at present (the formation Eq. (3) is given by d (z) = (1 + z) R z dz/H˜ (z˜), which ac- mass M 1015g), the current energy fraction f of L 0 f & PBH counts for the redshift of the photon energy and apparent PBHs over the DM component is given by the integral R Mmax emission rate [42, 43]. Combing (1) and (3) yields the fPBH ≡ ΩPBH/ΩDM = ψ(M)dM, where ΩPBH and Mmin observed photon fluxes in various photon energy ranges Ω are the current normalized density of PBHs and DM, DM from a single PBH bubble located at z, as reported in the respectively. The current mass function ψ(M) is defined upper right panel of Fig.1. It shows that for the small as ψ(M) ≡ Mn (M)/ρ , where the scale factor at PBH DM peak mass M = 1013g, the observable fluxes of the PBH present takes a(t ) = 1. If the PBHs were from inflation- pk 0 bubble of redshift z 1 would increase to some extent in ary fluctuations, they naturally satisfy a lognormal mass & contrast to the larger peak mass M = 1015, 1017g. This function [22, 32], pk is because that a majority of PBH bubbles with small 2 M could evaporate at high redshifts. fPBH h ln (M/Mpk)i pk ψLN(M) = √ exp − , (2) Gamma-ray signals – Recall that the PBH mass func- 2πσM 2σ2 tion in (2) relies on three parameters, i.e., fPBH, σ and where the subscript “LN” denotes the lognormal type. Mpk. Even in the case that the PBHs disappeared at Given fPBH, there are two parameters in ψLN(M): σ the early time, one can generalize the concept of fPBH describes the width of mass distribution and Mpk is the to be the total PBH density at a certain time against mass at which the function MψLN(M) (the DM faction the present DM density, which is consistent with the in PBHs at the logarithmic interval around M) peaks. standard definition of fPBH, and convenient for our calcu- 15 Since light PBHs (Mf . 10 g) would have evaporated at lation. Furthermore, the intrinsic luminosity of Hawking earlier time, the present mass function could be deformed radiation involves two other parameters of a bubble, i.e., from the initial shape, especially in the low-mass tail [33]. its physical volume V and redshift z. Note that, one can The extragalactic gamma-ray background (EGB) is an combine fPBH and V to yield the initial total mass of a important constraint for evaporating PBHs [34]. With PBH bubble Mbub which is of observable interest (It is the advent of gamma-ray experiments in various energy reasonable to assume that the total mass of the bubble ranges, such as the Imaging Compton Telescope (COMP- is dominated by PBHs for detectable signals, as we will TEL) for 0.8 ∼ 30 MeV [35], the Energetic Gamma Ray show below). Thus, we get four parameters: Mbub, z, 3

104

10-30 ] 0.1 - 1 s - 3 -50 ]

10 - 1

cm -6 s 10

- 1 13 13 Mpk=10 g, E=10GeV - 2 Mpk=10 g, E=10GeV M 13 M 13 10-70 pk=10 g, E=100GeV 10-11 pk=10 g, E=100GeV 15 15 Mpk=10 g, E=10GeV cm [ erg F Mpk=10 g, E=10GeV [ GeV / dtdE γ

n 15 -16 15

2 M M 10-90 pk=10 g, E=100GeV 10 pk=10 g, E=100GeV d 17 17 Mpk=10 g, E=10GeV Mpk=10 g, E=10GeV M 17 10-21 M 17 10-110 pk=10 g, E=100GeV pk=10 g, E=100GeV 10-23 0.001 1017 1037 0.001 0.010 0.100 1 10 100 1000 t[s] z

1053 Fermi LAT 1045 Fermi LAT 1048 1042 1043

[ g ] 39 10 [ g ] bub bub 1038

M z=0.1, E=10GeV M 1036 z=0.1, E=100GeV M =1013g, E=10GeV z=1, E=10GeV 1033 pk M =1015g, E=10GeV 1033 z=1, E=100GeV pk M 17 z=10, E=10GeV 1028 pk=10 g, E=10GeV z=10, E=100GeV 1030 1012 1014 1016 1018 0.001 0.010 0.100 1 10 100 1000

Mpk [g] z

2 FIG. 1. Upper left: The spectrum d nγ /dtdE of a PBH bubble as a function of cosmic time t for peak masses Mpk = 13 15 17 10 , 10 , 10 g and photon energies E = 10, 100GeV, respectively. For simplicity, we have set fPBH = 1 and σ = 1. Upper right: The observed photon ﬂux F of a PBH bubble of physical volume 1 Mpc3 located at diﬀerent redshifts, for various peak masses and photon energies. Lower left: The parameter space of the peak mass Mpk and bubble mass Mbub of a PBH bubble allowed by Fermi LAT (the shaded regions) for redshifts z = 0.1, 1, 10 and photon energies E = 10, 100GeV, respectively. Lower right: The parameter space of the redshift z and bubble mass Mbub allowed by Fermi LAT (the shaded regions) with the photon 13 15 17 energy E = 10GeV and peak masses Mpk = 10 , 10 , 10 g, respectively.

Mpk and σ. Using the point-source differential sensitiv- ble for these events are under debate [1, 2, 44], it deserves ity in the 10-year observation of Fermi LAT for a high to examine the possibility of their origins being exotic Galactic latitude (around the north Celestial pole) source celestial objects including the PBH stellar bubble. There- [37], we numerically derive the experimentally allowed fore, we confront our scenario with the latest LHAASO parameter spaces for (Mbub, Mpk) and (Mbub, z) by the data and report the numerical results in the left panel shaded regions in the lower panels of Fig.1, respectively. of Fig.2. In order to examine the relation between the Setting σ = 1, for given redshifts and photon energies, gamma-ray spectrum and the present PBH mass distri- the lower bound of the parameter space for Mpk and bution, the present lognormal distribution is considered 15 Mbub is around Mpk ' 10 g, which is the mass scale instead of a primordial one. Accordingly, M˜ pk denotes the evaporating at present, and the corresponding bubble peak mass of present lognormal distribution, and M˜ bub 32 mass is Mbub ' 10 g ∼ M , close to one solar mass. denotes the present stellar bubble mass. In the numerical For the smaller or larger values of Mpk, the correspond- calculations, we set σ = 1. Allowing σ to vary may lead ing Hawking radiation has either decayed out already or to better fits to observations, which we will not explore not yet become efficient, and thus the bubble mass Mbub in the present work. Our results illustrate well that the needs to be heavy enough to yield observable evidences. PBH stellar bubbles can provide a decent fit as shown in Additionally, two lower panels of Fig.1 indicate that, the plot explicitly. the closer the stellar PBH bubbles are to the Earth, the easier they could be probed. The “plateau” for the case GW signals – The PBH formation and the evolution 13 of Mpk = 10 g and z & 1 appeared in the lower right of PBH binaries produce GWs. It is known that PBHs 3 panel of Fig.1 is due to the same reason for the fluxes of are formed with mass MPBH ∼ c t/G, and thus if they 13 Mpk = 10 g shown in the upper right panel. were formed within 1 second after the big bang, the corre- 4 Recently, the LHAASO experiment reported the aston- sponding PBH mass is less than 10 M and the associated ishing detection of twelve ultrahigh-energy gamma-ray GWs become very weak for observations. Accordingly, sources [16], which indicates some high energy physics in the main observational channel of GWs is to follow the stellar objects. While the astrophysical sources responsi- evolution of PBH binaries when considering heavy masses. 4

  10 15 10 54 Mpk =5×10 g, Mbub = 3.8×10 g 10 LHAASO J2226+6057 34 -10 Mpk=10 g 10  10  16 LHAASO J1908+0621 M =5×10 g, M = 7.3×10 g 36 BBO pk bub Mpk=10 g   51 ] LHAASO J1825-1326 10 16 -4 M 38 10 Mpk =5×10 g, Mbub = 5.3×10 g 10 SKA pk=10 g - 1 s -11 - 2 10 LISA LIGO 1048

2 -9 [ g ]

h 10 GW bub Ω 10-12 M 1045 BBO fPBH=10, z=0.001 r cm [ erg dN / dE -14 2 10 3 E fPBH=10 , z=0.001 42 10 f =10, z=0.01 10-13 PBH 3 10-19 fPBH=10 , z=0.01 1039 5 10 50 100 500 1000 10-8 10-6 10-4 0.01 1 100 1023 1026 1029 1032 1035 1038

E[TeV] f[Hz] Mpk [g]

FIG. 2. Left: The ﬁt of three diﬀerent PBH stellar bubbles to the data by LHAASO. The observation distance of ultrahigh-energy gamma-ray sources J2226 + 6057, J1908 + 0621, J1825 − 1326 are 0.8, 2.37, 1.55 kpc [45, 46], respectively. The blue curves are numerical results produced using the publicly available code BlackHawk [47], and the black curves are the superpositions of analytic black body spectra normalized by the BlackHawk calculation. Middle: The GW spectrum of a PBH stellar bubble. We 34 36 38 set fPBH = 1 in the bubble and z = 0.01. The mass distribution of PBHs is lognormal with σ = 1 and Mpk = 10 , 10 , 10 g for red, orange, blue shadow regions respectively. The lower and upper solid curves denote the total PBH mass in a bubble, which are set as 1045g and 1048g, respectively. Sensitivity curves of SKA [48], LISA [49], BBO [50] and LIGO [51] are plotted. Right: The parameter space of the bubble mass and peak mass of a PBH bubble that can be probed by BBO at 0.1Hz with 2 −15 3 ΩGWh = 2.9 × 10 . The solid and dashed lines denote fPBH = 10, 10 , respectively. Blue and red shaded regions denote z = 0.001, 0.01, respectively.

A PBH binary in a stellar bubble forms from two nearby region in the middle and right panels of Fig.2, respectively. black holes and decouples from the Hubble flow. Given In the middle panel of Fig.2, with the same total mass, the initial separation x in a binary system of total mass the larger peak mass of PBH mass distribution in the M = m1 + m2, the binary system decouples from the PBH stellar bubble, the more GWs are emitted at the 15 Hubble flow at z ≈ 3(1 + zeq)/λ − 1, where zeq ≈ 3000 is same frequency. Bubbles with peak mass around 10 g the redshift at matter-radiation equality in the ΛCDM emit weak GWs that are difficult to be probed within −9 2 cosmology with ΩM = 0.315, ΩΛ = 0.685 [52], and there (10 , 10 )Hz. The difficulty of detecting PBH stellar 3 15 is λ ≡ 8πρeqx /3M [53]. bubble with peak mass around 10 g is also shown in the In the binary evolution, the GW energy spectrum from right panel of Fig.2, where the total bubble mass should a single PBH stellar bubble can be calculated by be larger than 1053g with a peak mass less than 1023g at 3 0.1Hz for fPBH = 10 and z = 0.01. 1 1 dEGW ΩGW(f) = 2 fr R, (4) While PBH stellar bubbles with strong Hawking ra- ρc 4πd dfr L diation can hardly be probed by the current GW sur- where f is the observed GW frequency and fr is the GW veys, they may be detectable in some ultra-high fre- frequency in the rest frame of binaries, with f = fr/(1 + quency GW experiments. Note that the peak energy 2 z). ρc = 3H0 /8πG the critical density of the Universe, density in GW spectrum with different peak mass is and R is the comoving merger rate of PBH binaries [54]. similar. In Eq. (5), the peak energy radiation occurs at dEGW/dfr is the energy emission per frequency interval, 2/3 5/3 fr = f2, which is frdEGW/dfr = (πG) (f2M) η/f1 = which is parameterized by [55–57] 2 5/3 2 Mη(a2η +b2η+c2) /(a1η +b1η+c1). Comoving merger −32/37 dEGW 2/3 5/3 rate of binaries scales as R ∼ M , see [24, 54, 59] = (πG) Mc (5) dfr for details. Thus, the total radiation power in bina- 5/37 2  −1/3 ries’ rest frame is RfrdEGW/dfr ∼ M η(a2η + b2η + fr , fr < f1 5/3 2  c2) /(a1η + b1η + c1), which depends on symmetric  2/3 −1 × fr f1 , f1 ≤ fr < f2 mass ratio η and weakly depends on M. Due to the Mpk  2 −1 f 4f 2f f 4/34(f − f )2 + f 2 , f ≤ f < f independence in η distribution, the peak energy density 4 r 1 2 r 2 4 2 r 3 in GW spectrum is weakly dependent on the peak mass 3/5 1/5 where Mc ≡ (m1m2) /M is the chirp mass of the in PBH mass distribution. This provides the possibility of 2 binary system and fi = (aiη + biη + ci)/πGM. The detecting GW signals of strong Hawking radiation PBH 2 symmetric mass ratio η is defined as η ≡ m1m2/M and stellar bubble in ultra-high frequency range. the coefficients ai, bi, ci can be found in Table 1 of [58]. Concluding remarks – To conclude, we propose the In Eq. (5) the emitted GW energy is proportional to hypothetical possibility of stellar bubbles, which are star- 5/3 Mc , and thus the contributions of light PBH binaries like objects in the sky with exotic features. We focus on a to GWs are negligible. specific class of exotic stellar bubbles filled by lognormal Combining (4) and (5) yields the GW spectrum from a distributed PBHs and analyze their signatures through single PBH stellar bubble and detectable mass parameters both the EM and GW observational windows. For the 5

EM channel, a bubble dominated by light PBHs can yield the clusters LINDA and JUDY of the particle cosmology detectable gamma-ray spectra via Hawking radiation. The group at USTC and computing facilities at HKUST. 15 32 peak mass Mpk ∼ 10 g and bubble mass Mbub ∼ 10 g can be related to the 10 − 100 GeV detection band of Fermi LAT (Fig.1). Impressively, this scenario can make SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL a decent fit to the ultrahigh-energy gamma-ray events discovered by LHAASO and hence hint to the existence Hawking radiation and intrinsic luminosity – In this part, we briefly review the Hawking radiation and intrinsic of PBH stellar bubbles with the present peak mass M˜ p ∼ 1010g (the left panel of Fig.2). For the GWs channel, we luminosity of an individual PBH and refer to [39, 40] for 34 38 comprehensive studies. It was found in [25, 26] that a find that massive PBH binaries with Mpk ∼ 10 − 10 45 48 black hole could emit particles similar to the black-body g and Mbub ∼ 10 − 10 g can produce detectable GWs within in the frequency band of LISA and BBO (the radiation, with energies in the range (E,E + dE) at a middle panel of Fig.2). rate We comment that, although EM and GW signals from d2N 1 Γ (E,M) = s , (6) PBH bubbles can hardly be overlapped in the parameter dtdE 2π e8πGME − (−1)2s space, these two channels are complementary for light and heavy bubbles. The search for light PBH bubbles per particle degree of freedom (e.g. spin, electric charge, can be promising by observing a number of gamma-ray flavor and color). Here M is the mass of the black hole, s sources whose spectra follow Hawking spectra and their is the particle spin. In contrast to the astrophysical black fluxes along the line-of-sight fitting to the light curves of holes, PBHs collapsing from the overlarge primordial den- PBH bubbles as displayed in Fig.1. For heavy bubbles, sity perturbations could be small enough for Hawking they can be more accessible by the GW astronomy. These radiation to be significant. The high-energy particles radi- combined limits can further impose the constraint upon ated from PBHs could influence various physical processes the mass function of the PBHs, and thus can shed light in the early Universe. Thus, one can impose evaporation on the PBHs formation in the Universe. Accordingly, if constraints on PBH initial or current abundance via rel- such PBH stellar bubbles were observed, it can serve as a evant observations, such as Big Bang Nucleosynthesis, novel window to probe the very early Universe. CMB and gamma-ray observations. (The detailed discus- Additionally, cosmic neutrinos and ultra-high frequency sions can see Refs. [39, 64] and the references therein). GWs could also be generated from these exotic stellar According to the radiation rate (6), the black hole tem- bubbles. The IceCube Neutrino Observatory has already perature can be defined as confirmed the high-energy cosmic neutrinos as the key 1 messengers to reveal an unobstructed view of the Universe T = ' 1.06 × M −1 TeV , (7) BH 8πGM 10 at wavelengths where it is opaque to EM signals [60]. On the other hand, the PBH bubbles may leave significant where M10 is related to the black hole mass M ≡ M10 × 10 GWs of extremely high frequencies, which urges the devel- 10 g. And Γs(E,M) is the dimensionless absorption opment of GW technology in ultra-high frequency bands. coefficient which accounts for the probability that the We end by mentioning that, while we have discussed as- particle would be absorbed if it were incident in this trophysical phenomena of exotic stellar bubbles filled by state on the black hole. The functional expressions of PBHs, there exist other types of bubbles that produce Γs(E,M) for massless and massive particles can be found observable signals, such as collision of cosmic strings [61] in Refs. [65–67]. Hawking temperature (7) tells us that and domain walls [62] in the bubbles, matter-antimatter a smaller black hole is much hotter than a larger black annihilation at their boundaries [63], and so on. These hole, and the emission is also stronger. Note that we exotic stellar bubbles from the primordial Universe can adopt the assumption that a black hole has no charge or unveil rich physics hidden in the light of stars, which angular momentum, which is reasonable since charge and deserve to be explored in the future. angular momentum would also be lost through quantum Acknowledgments – We are grateful to Xiaojun Bi, emission on a shorter time scale than the mass loss time Ruoyu Liu and Ruizhi Yang for valuable discussions. scale [68, 69]; extension to the charged and rotational YFC and CC are supported in part by the NSFC (Nos. black holes is straightforward [65–67]. Since a black hole 11653002, 11961131007, 11722327, 11421303), by the Na- continuously emits particles, its mass decreases while the tional Youth Talents Program of China, by the Fundamen- temperature goes up. The approximate formula for the tal Research Funds for Central Universities, by the CSC mass loss rate can be written as [39, 68] Innovation Talent Funds, and by the USTC Fellowship for dM International Cooperation. QD and YW are supported 10 ' −5.34 × 10−5φ(M)M −2 s−1 , (8) dt 10 in part by the CRF grant C6017-20GF by the RGC of Hong Kong SAR, and the NSFC EYS (Hong Kong and where φ(M) measures the number of emitted particle Macau) Grant No. 12022516. We acknowledge the use of species and is normalized to unity for the black holes 6 with M 1017 g, emitting only massless photons, three physical cm3 for PBHs with various horizon masses generations of neutrinos and graviton. The relativistic 1015, 1016, 1017, 1020 g, and the corresponding energy frac- contributions to φ(M) per degree of particle freedom tion is set to fPBH = 1. As we expect, the primary are φs=0 = 0.267, φs=1 = 0.060, φs=3/2 = 0.020, φs=2 = photons instantaneous spectrum dominates the high-tail 15 0.007, φs=1/2 = 0.147 (neutral), φs=1/2 = 0.142 (charge ± of radiated spectra for the heavy PBHs (i.e., M > 10 ). e)[68]. Integrating the mass loss rate (8) over time then This figure is similar to the Fig. 1 in Ref. [39] which gives the lifetime of a black hole shows the instantaneous emission rate of photons for four typical black hole masses. φ(M)−1 τ ∼ 407 M 3 s . (9) 15.35 10 -15 ]

If we sum up the contributions from all the particles in the - 3 -20 Standard Model up to 1 TeV, corresponding to M10 ∼ 1, cm

- 1 -25 this gives φ(M) = 15.35. The mass of a PBH evaporating s at τ after Big Bang is given by [39] - 1 -30

17 16 15 GeV 10 g 10 g 10 g [ -35 φ(M)1/3 τ 1/3

9 γ M ' 1.35 × 10 g . (10) -40 1020g dn

15.35 1s dE dt Thus, the mass of a PBH evaporating at present is roughly 10 -45 14 log M∗ ' 5.1 × 10 g (corresponding to TBH = 21MeV). -50 Here, we adopt a standard emission picture that a black -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 E hole emits only those particles which appear elementary log10 γ[GeV] on the scale of the radiated energy (or equivalently the black hole size) [68]. The emitted particles could form FIG. 3. Instantaneous emission rate of photons per physical cm3 from PBHs with various horizon masses: composite particles after emission. A black hole should 1015, 1016, 1017, 1020 g, and the corresponding current energy emit all elementary particles whose rest masses are less fraction is set to fPBH = 1. The dashed and the solid ones than or of the order of TBH. The spectra of the particles represent the instantaneous primary and total (primary + sec- emitted through the lifetime of PBHs is calculated from ondary) emission rates, respectively. We used the open source the BlackHawk code [47]. When TBH increases, the black code BlackHawk [47] to calculate the above photon radiated hole initially directly emits only photons (and gravitons), spectra. then neutrinos, electrons, muons and eventually direct The intrinsic luminosity of Hawking radiation from a pions join in the emission as TBH surpasses successive particle rest mass thresholds. Once the black hole temper- PBH bubble is given by ature exceeds QCD energy scale ΛQCD = 250 − 300MeV, 2 2 d nγ d nγ the particles radiated can be regarded as asymptotically L(E, t) = E V dE ' E2 V (12) dtdE dtdE free, leading to the emission of quarks and gluons. After their emission, quarks and gluons fragment into further with dimensions GeV s−1. Note that we used the approx- quarks and gluons until they cluster into the observable imation of the energy interval in the logarithmic scale hadrons including protons and antiprotons, electrons, and dE ' E. Here, E is the emitted photon energy from positrons. Since there are 12 quark degrees of freedom per the PBH bubble. The nearly time-independent behavior 2 flavor and 16 gluon degrees of freedom, one would expect of d nγ /dtdE during early times, as shown in Fig.1, is the emission rate (i.e., the value of φ) to increase suddenly due to the fact that the major contribution to the mass once the QCD temperature is reached. Thus, Hawking integral in Eq. (1) is made by the low-mass range above radiation is dominated by the decay of QCD particles the low bound Mmin. At the early time, the low-mass 14 when the PBHs masses falls below Mq ' 0.4M∗ ' 2×10 range barely changes, which leads to the time-independent 2 g [39, 68, 69]. instantaneous emission rates d nγ /dtdE in Fig.1. As the As discussed above, particles injected from a PBH have PBHs evaporate, the low bound Mmin would go up, suc- two components: the primary component, which is the cessively reaching the final evaporation stage of low-mass direct Hawking emission; the secondary component, which PBHs, the emission rates thus bump up at a later time. comes from the decay of gauge bosons or heavy leptons Finally, the emission rate would fade out on account of and the hadrons produced by fragmentation of primary the evaporation of the low-mass range. quarks and gluons [39]. For photons, we have Formation and merger rate of PBH binaries – In this part, we briefly review the formation of PBH binaries and dN˙ dN˙ pri dN˙ sec (E,M) = (E,M) + (E,M) , (11) its merger rate. For more details, we would like to refer dE dE dE to [53, 54]. with similar expressions to other particles. Fig.3 The PBH binary forms when two neighboring black plots the instantaneous emission rate of photons per holes are close enough and decouple from the Hubble flow. 7

Given the equation of motion of two-point masses M at From Eq. (20), the merger rate of PBH binaries can be rest with initial separation x, the proper separation r obtained from the initial semi-major axis a distribution along the axis of motion evolves as and the initial dimensionless angular momentum j distribution. The initial semi-major axis a after the binary 2M r r¨ − (H˙ + H2)r + = 0 , (13) formation is numerically given in [53], r2 |r| 0.1¯x where dots represent the differentiation with respect to a ≈ 0.1λx = ij X4/3, (21) proper time. In order to describe the early-Universe fb∆ evolution, we use s ≡ a/a the scale factor normalized to eq where, X ≡ x3/x¯3 . Therefore, the initial semi-major axis unity at matter-radiation equality to express the Hubble ij distribution is determined by the separation x distribution, parameter as H(s) = (8πρ /3)1/2h(s), where h is defined √ eq we follow [53, 54] that assuming PBHs follow a random as h(s) ≡ s−3 + s−4 and ρ is the matter density at eq distribution, the probability distribution of the separation equality. Then, we can rewrite Eq. (13) by introducing x is χ ≡ r/x as dP −1 −X 4π x¯3 n sh0 + h 1 1 1 χ = µ e 3 ij T , (22) χ00 + (sχ0 − χ) + = 0 , (14) dX ij s2h λ (sh)2 χ2 |χ| where n ≡ f ρ (1+z )3 R ∞ P (m) dm. Considering where primes denote differentiation with respect to s. T PBH DM eq 0 m Here, the dimensionless parameter λ is defined as λ ≡ fixed X, the dimensionless angular momentum j can be 3 given by Eq. (20) and Eq. (21), 4πρeqx /3M. The initial condition is given in the condition that the two neighboring black holes follow the 3 G3m m M(f ∆)4 1/7 Hubble flow χ(s) = s, the initial conditions are j(t; X) = 1 2 b t . (23) 4 16/3 85 (0.1¯xij) X χ(0) = 0 , χ0(0) = 1 . (15) The differential probability distribution of (X, t) is given Then, the numerical solution in [53] shows that the binary by effectively decouples from the Hubble flow at s ≈ λ/3. 2 The corresponding redshift is d P dP ∂j dP = 3(1 + z ) dXdt dX ∂t dj X j(t;X) z = eq − 1 . (16) λ −1 µij −X 4π x¯3 n = e 3 ij T P(j/j ) , (24) In order to get the merger rate of PBH binaries with 7t X mass distribution P (m) at cosmic time t, we follow [54] 2 where jX = 0.5fX/fb∆, P(j/jX ) = (j/jX ) /(1 + and define the binned mass distribution P (m) and mass 2 2 3/2 interval ∆, which follows j /jX ) . Integrating Eq. (24) gives the merger time probability distribution m Xmax P (m)∆ = 1 . (17) −1 Z dP µij −X 4π x¯3 n = dXe 3 ij T P(j/j ) . (25) mmin dt 7t X The average distance between two nearby black holes is Then, the comoving merger rate Rij for binary system at −3 −3 −1/3 1/3 time t is hxiji = (¯xi +x ¯j ) = µij x¯ij , (18) P (m ) P (m ) dP where, µij andx ¯ij are defined as i j Rij(t) = ρPBHmin , ∆ . (26) mi mj dt 2mimjfb µij = , mbf(P (mj)mi + P (mi)mj) The merger rate for the whole PBH distribution can be obtained by summarizing all the binaries system, 3 3 mb x¯ij = , (19) 8π ρeqfb∆ X P (mi) P (mj) dP R(t) = ρPBHmin , ∆ . (27) where, fb = f(P (mi) + P (mj)) and mb = mi + mj. Here, mi mj dt 0

4 3 a LGW(t) 7 S(t) = , (28) t = 3 j . (20) 2 85 G m1m2M 4πdL 8

1017 where LGW(t) is the GW luminosity measured in the PBH CAST rest frame. Then, integrating S(t) over the PBH binary OSQAR II 7 M 18 evolution gives the observed redshifted GW energy, which 10 pk=10 g M 21 is pk=10 g M =1024g 0.001 pk ∞ ∞ 2 SKA Z Z h 1 + z LISA LIGO S(t)dt = L (t )dt GW

GW r r Ω 2 BBO −∞ 4πdL −∞ 10-13 Z ∞ 1 + z dEGW = dfr . (29) 2 10-23 4πdL 0 dfr

Here the relation of time measured in the rest frame of 10-33 10-10 1 1010 1020 source and observed frame is tr = t/(1+z). The observed f[Hz] energy density can be expressed as Z ∞ df FIG. 4. The GW spectrum of a single PBH stellar bubble. ρGW = ΩGW(f)ρc The fPBH = 1 in PBH stellar bubble and redshift of bubble is 0 f set as z = 0.01. The extended mass distribution of PBH is log- z ∞ Z max 1 + z Z dE df dN normal distribution with σ = 1 and M = 1018g, 1021g, 1024g = f GW dz . (30) pk 2 r for red, orange, blue shadow region respectively. The lower zmin 4πdL 0 dfr f dtdz solid line and upper solid line denote the total PBH mass Here, dN/dtdz is the number of merger events which in bubble which is set as 1045g and the 1048g respectively. occur in dt between redshift z and z + dz. Therefore, Sensitivity curve below 1000Hz from SKA, LISA, BBO and Ω can be written as LIGO are plotted. Sensitivity curve in ultra-high frequency GW range from OSQAR [72] and CAST [73] are also plotted. Z zmax 1 1 dEGW dN ΩGW(f) = 2 fr (1 + z) dz . ρc 4πdL dfr zmin dtdz (31) Here, we deﬁne mass ratio γi ≡ mi/Mpk. The γ and η can be shown that they are independent on the Mpk in Compare with the cosmic distance, the comoving size lognormal distribution as following, of PBH stellar bubble is relatively small, so that ∆z = 2 zmax − zmin is tiny. Eq. (31) can be written as fPBH h ln (M/Mpk)i ψLN(M)dM = √ exp − dM 2πσM 2σ2 1 1 dE dN GW 2 ΩGW(f) = 2 fr fPBH h ln (γ)i ρc 4πd dfr dtr √ L = exp − 2 Mpkdγ . 2πσγMpk 2σ 1 1 dEGW = 2 fr R. (32) (35) ρc 4πdL dfr From the Eq. (32), we can get the GW spectrum from Therefore, the γ distribution is the single PBH stellar bubble in Fig.4. f h ln2(γ)i In Fig.4, the GW energy density from the PBH stel- √ PBH ψLN(γ)dγ = exp − 2 dγ , (36) lar bubble with small peak mass is weak in detection. 2πσγ 2σ However, the peak energy density of PBH stellar bubble which is independent with M . η can be expressed as weakly depends on the peak mass. In Eq. (5), the peak pk energy radiation occurs at fr = f2, so m1m2 γ1γ2 η = 2 = 2 , (37) 5/3 (m1 + m2) (γ1 + γ2) dEGW 2/3 (f2M) fr = (πG) η dfr f1 which is also independent with Mpk. Therefore Eq. (34) 2 5/3 5/37 (a2η + b2η + c2) shows the peak energy density depends on the Mpk , = Mη 2 . (33) a1η + b1η + c1 which weakly depends on the peak mass in PBH distribution. In Eq. (27), R ∼ M −32/37, see [24, 54, 59] for details. As the result, the peak radiation power in the rest frame of PBH stellar bubble is 2 5/3 dE (a η + b η + c ) ∗ Rf GW ∼ M 5/37η 2 2 2 [email protected] r 2 † dfr a1η + b1η + c1 [email protected] 2 5/3 ‡ [email protected] 5/37 5/37 (a2η + b2η + c2) § ∼ Mpk (γ1 + γ2) η 2 . [email protected] a1η + b1η + c1 [1] S. R. Kelner, Felix A. Aharonian, and V. V. Bugayov. (34) Energy spectra of gamma-rays, electrons and neutrinos 9

produced at proton-proton interactions in the very high Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter. Phys. Rev., energy regime. Phys. Rev. D, 74:034018, 2006. [Erratum: D94(8):083504, 2016. Phys.Rev.D 79, 039901 (2009)]. [23] Simeon Bird, Ilias Cholis, Julian B. Muñoz,Yacine Ali- [2] Andrew W. Strong, Igor V. Moskalenko, and Vladimir S. Ha¨ımoud,Marc Kamionkowski, Ely D. Kovetz, Alvise Ptuskin. Cosmic-ray propagation and interactions in the Raccanelli, and Adam G. Riess. Did LIGO detect dark Galaxy. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci., 57:285–327, 2007. matter? Phys. Rev. Lett., 116(20):201301, 2016. [3] E. G. Berezhko and L. T. Ksenofontov. Composition of [24] Misao Sasaki, Teruaki Suyama, Takahiro Tanaka, and cosmic rays accelerated in supernova remnants. J. Exp. Shuichiro Yokoyama. Primordial Black Hole Scenario for Theor. Phys., 89:391–403, 1999. the Gravitational-Wave Event GW150914. Phys. Rev. [4] K. Kobayakawa, Y. Sato, and T. Samura. Acceleration of Lett., 117(6):061101, 2016. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 121, particles by oblique shocks and cosmic ray spectra around 059901 (2018)]. the knee region. Phys. Rev. D, 66:083004, 2002. [25] S. W. Hawking. Black hole explosions. Nature, 248:30–31, [5] B. P. Abbott et al. Multi-messenger Observations of a Bi- 1974. nary Neutron Star Merger. Astrophys. J. Lett., 848(2):L12, [26] S. W. Hawking. Particle Creation by Black Holes. Com- 2017. mun. Math. Phys., 43:199–220, 1975. [Erratum: Com- [6] B. P. Abbott et al. Tests of general relativity with mun.Math.Phys. 46, 206 (1976)]. GW150914. Phys. Rev. Lett., 116(22):221101, 2016. [Er- [27] Jane H. MacGibbon and Bernard J. Carr. Cosmic rays ratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 121, 129902 (2018)]. from primordial black holes. Astrophys. J., 371:447–469, [7] PéterMészáros,Derek B. Fox, Chad Hanna, and Ko- 1991. hta Murase. Multi-Messenger Astrophysics. Nature Rev. [28] Yi-Fu Cai, Xi Tong, Dong-Gang Wang, and Sheng-Feng Phys., 1:585–599, 2019. Yan. Primordial Black Holes from Sound Speed Resonance [8] D. D. Ivanenko and D. F. Kurdgelaidze. Hypothesis during Inflation. Phys. Rev. Lett., 121(8):081306, 2018. concerning quark stars. Astrophysics, 1:251–252, 1965. [29] Chao Chen and Yi-Fu Cai. Primordial black holes from [9] David J. Kaup. Klein-Gordon Geon. Phys. Rev., 172:1331– sound speed resonance in the inflaton-curvaton mixed 1342, 1968. scenario. JCAP, 1910(10):068, 2019. [10] Douglas Spolyar, Katherine Freese, and Paolo Gondolo. [30] Bernard Carr and Florian Kuhnel. Primordial black Dark matter and the first stars: a new phase of stellar holes with multimodal mass spectra. Phys. Rev., evolution. Phys. Rev. Lett., 100:051101, 2008. D99(10):103535, 2019. [11] Simon Dupourqué,Luigi Tibaldo, and Peter Von Ball- [31] Zihan Zhou, Jie Jiang, Yi-Fu Cai, Misao Sasaki, and Shi moos. Constraints on the antistar fraction in the So- Pi. Primordial black holes and gravitational waves from lar System neighborhood from the 10-year Fermi Large resonant amplification during inflation. Phys. Rev. D, Area Telescope gamma-ray source catalog. Phys. Rev. D, 102(10):103527, 2020. 103(8):083016, 2021. [32] Alexandre Dolgov and Joseph Silk. Baryon isocurvature [12] Sidney R. Coleman and Frank De Luccia. Gravitational fluctuations at small scales and baryonic dark matter. Effects on and of Vacuum Decay. Phys. Rev., D21:3305, Phys. Rev. D, 47:4244–4255, 1993. 1980. [33] B. J. Carr, Kazunori Kohri, Yuuiti Sendouda, and Jun’ichi [13] Zihan Zhou, Jun Yan, Andrea Addazi, Yi-Fu Cai, An- Yokoyama. Constraints on primordial black holes from tonino Marciano, and Roman Pasechnik. Probing new the Galactic gamma-ray background. Phys. Rev. D, physics with multi-vacua quantum tunnelings beyond 94(4):044029, 2016. standard model through gravitational waves. Phys. Lett. [34] Don N. Page and S. W. Hawking. Gamma rays from B, 812:136026, 2021. primordial black holes. Astrophys. J., 206:1–7, 1976. [14] Miao Li and Yi Wang. Multi-Stream Inflation. JCAP, [35] G Weidenspointner, M Varendorff, SC Kappadath, K Ben- 07:033, 2009. nett, H Bloemen, R Diehl, W Hermsen, GG Lichti, J Ryan, [15] Andrew G. Cohen, A. De Rujula, and S. L. Glashow. A and V Schönfelder.The cosmic diffuse gamma-ray back- Matter - antimatter universe? Astrophys. J., 495:539–549, ground measured with comptel. In AIP Conference Pro- 1998. ceedings, volume 510, pages 467–470. American Institute [16] Zhen Cao et al. Ultrahigh-energy photons up to 1.4 of Physics, 2000. petaelectronvolts from 12 γ-ray galactic sources. Nature, [36] A. W. Strong, I. V. Moskalenko, and O. Reimer. A May 2021. new determination of the extragalactic diffuse gamma-ray [17] Y. B. Zel’dovich and I. D. Novikov. The Hypothesis of background from egret data. Astrophys. J., 613:956–961, Cores Retarded during Expansion and the Hot Cosmolog- 2004. ical Model. Sov. Astron., 10:602, 1966. [37] W. B. Atwood et al. The Large Area Telescope on the [18] Stephen Hawking. Gravitationally collapsed objects of Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope Mission. Astrophys. very low mass. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 152:75, 1971. J., 697:1071–1102, 2009. [19] Bernard J. Carr and S. W. Hawking. Black holes in the [38] Bernard J. Carr and J. H. MacGibbon. Cosmic rays early Universe. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 168:399–415, from primordial black holes and constraints on the early 1974. universe. Phys. Rept., 307:141–154, 1998. [20] Maxim Yu. Khlopov. Primordial Black Holes. Res. Astron. [39] B. J. Carr, Kazunori Kohri, Yuuiti Sendouda, and Jun’ichi Astrophys., 10:495–528, 2010. Yokoyama. New cosmological constraints on primordial [21] Misao Sasaki, Teruaki Suyama, Takahiro Tanaka, black holes. Phys. Rev., D81:104019, 2010. and Shuichiro Yokoyama. Primordial black [40] T. N. Ukwatta, D. R. Stump, J. T. Linnemann, J. H. holes—perspectives in gravitational wave astronomy. MacGibbon, S. S. Marinelli, T. Yapici, and K. Tollefson. Class. Quant. Grav., 35(6):063001, 2018. Primordial Black Holes: Observational Characteristics [22] Bernard Carr, Florian Kuhnel, and Marit Sandstad. of The Final Evaporation. Astropart. Phys., 80:90–114, 10

2016. Zong-Hong Zhu. Stochastic Gravitational Wave Back- [41] Sunghoon Jung and TaeHun Kim. Gamma-ray burst ground from Coalescing Binary Black Holes. Astrophys. lensing parallax: Closing the primordial black hole dark J., 739:86, 2011. matter mass window. Phys. Rev. Res., 2(1):013113, 2020. [58] P. Ajith et al. A Template bank for gravitational wave- [42] Scott Dodelson. Modern Cosmology. Academic Press, forms from coalescing binary black holes. I. Non-spinning Amsterdam, 2003. binaries. Phys. Rev. D, 77:104017, 2008. [Erratum: [43] V. Mukhanov. Physical Foundations of Cosmology. Cam- Phys.Rev.D 79, 129901 (2009)]. bridge University Press, Oxford, 2005. [59] Qianhang Ding, Tomohiro Nakama, Joseph Silk, and [44] A. Albert et al. Evidence that Ultra-high-energy Gamma Yi Wang. Detectability of Gravitational Waves from Rays Are a Universal Feature near Powerful Pulsars. As- the Coalescence of Massive Primordial Black Holes with trophys. J. Lett., 911(2):L27, 2021. Initial Clustering. Phys. Rev. D, 100(10):103003, 2019. [45] Roland Kothes, Bulent Uyaniker, and Serge Pineault. [60] M. G. Aartsen et al. Evidence for High-Energy Ex- The snr g106.3+2.7 and its pulsar wind nebula: relics traterrestrial Neutrinos at the IceCube Detector. Science, of triggered star formation in a complex environment. 342:1242856, 2013. Astrophys. J., 560:236, 2001. [61] E. P. S. Shellard. Cosmic String Interactions. Nucl. Phys. [46] Liang Chen, Zheng Xiong, Cong Li, SongZhan Chen, and B, 283:624–656, 1987. HuiHai He. Strong constraints on Lorentz violation using [62] Yu-ichi Takamizu and Kei-ichi Maeda. Collision of domain new γ-ray observations around PeV. 5 2021. walls and reheating of the brane universe. Phys. Rev. D, [47] Alexandre Arbey and Jérémy Auffinger. BlackHawk: 70:123514, 2004. A public code for calculating the Hawking evaporation [63] S. I. Blinnikov, A. D. Dolgov, and K. A. Postnov. Anti- spectra of any black hole distribution. Eur. Phys. J. C, matter and antistars in the universe and in the Galaxy. 79(8):693, 2019. Phys. Rev. D, 92(2):023516, 2015. [48] P. E. Dewdney, P. J. Hall, R. T. Schilizzi, and T. J. L. W. [64] Bernard Carr, Kazunori Kohri, Yuuiti Sendouda, and Lazio. The Square Kilometre Array. IEEE Proceedings, Jun’ichi Yokoyama. Constraints on Primordial Black 97(8):1482–1496, August 2009. Holes. 2 2020. [49] P Bender, A Brillet, I Ciufolini, AM Cruise, C Cutler, [65] Don N. Page. Particle Emission Rates from a Black Hole: K Danzmann, F Fidecaro, WM Folkner, J Hough, P Mc- Massless Particles from an Uncharged, Nonrotating Hole. Namara, et al. Lisa pre-phase a report. Max-Planck Phys. Rev. D, 13:198–206, 1976. Institut für Quantenoptik, 1998. [66] Don N. Page. Particle Emission Rates from a Black Hole. [50] Jeff Crowder and Neil J. Cornish. Beyond LISA: Explor- 2. Massless Particles from a Rotating Hole. Phys. Rev. D, ing future gravitational wave missions. Phys. Rev. D, 14:3260–3273, 1976. 72:083005, 2005. [67] Don N. Page. Particle Emission Rates from a Black Hole. [51] B. P. Abbott et al. LIGO: The Laser interferome- 3. Charged Leptons from a Nonrotating Hole. Phys. Rev. ter gravitational-wave observatory. Rept. Prog. Phys., D, 16:2402–2411, 1977. 72:076901, 2009. [68] J. H. MacGibbon and B. R. Webber. Quark and gluon jet [52] N. Aghanim et al. Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological emission from primordial black holes: The instantaneous parameters. Astron. Astrophys., 641:A6, 2020. spectra. Phys. Rev. D, 41:3052–3079, 1990. [53] Yacine Ali-Ha¨ımoud, Ely D. Kovetz, and Marc [69] Jane H. MacGibbon. Quark and gluon jet emission from Kamionkowski. Merger rate of primordial black-hole bi- primordial black holes. 2. The Lifetime emission. Phys. naries. Phys. Rev. D, 96(12):123523, 2017. Rev. D, 44:376–392, 1991. [54] Zu-Cheng Chen and Qing-Guo Huang. Merger Rate [70] P. C. Peters. Gravitational Radiation and the Motion of Distribution of Primordial-Black-Hole Binaries. Astrophys. Two Point Masses. Phys. Rev., 136:B1224–B1232, 1964. J., 864(1):61, 2018. [71] E. S. Phinney. A Practical theorem on gravitational wave [55] C. Cutler, Eric Poisson, G. J. Sussman, and L. S. Finn. backgrounds. 7 2001. Gravitational radiation from a particle in circular orbit [72] P. Pugnat et al. Search for weakly interacting sub-eV around a black hole. 2: Numerical results for the nonro- particles with the OSQAR laser-based experiment: results tating case. Phys. Rev. D, 47:1511–1518, 1993. and perspectives. Eur. Phys. J. C, 74(8):3027, 2014. [56] David F. Chernoff and Lee Samuel Finn. Gravitational [73] V. Anastassopoulos et al. New CAST Limit on the Axion- radiation, inspiraling binaries, and cosmology. Astrophys. Photon Interaction. Nature Phys., 13:584–590, 2017. J. Lett., 411:L5–L8, 1993. [57] Xing-Jiang Zhu, E. Howell, T. Regimbau, D. Blair, and