Entire Issue (PDF)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 114 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 162 WASHINGTON, MONDAY, APRIL 4, 2016 No. 50 House of Representatives The House was not in session today. Its next meeting will be held on Monday, April 11, 2016, at 3:30 p.m. Senate MONDAY, APRIL 4, 2016 The Senate met at 3 p.m. and was to the Senate from the President pro our Nation and across the world. They called to order by the Honorable BILL tempore (Mr. HATCH). defend this symbol of our democracy, CASSIDY, a Senator from the State of The legislative clerk read the fol- and that means putting themselves in Louisiana. lowing letter: harm’s way day in and day out. Again, f U.S. SENATE, we thank them for it. PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE, We also welcome Capitol Police Chief PRAYER Washington, DC, April 4, 2016. Matthew Verderosa. Chief Verderosa The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- To the Senate: comes to us with more than three dec- fered the following prayer: Under the provisions of rule I, paragraph 3, ades of law enforcement experience, Let us pray. of the Standing Rules of the Senate, I hereby and that is a good thing given that this Worthy God, unto whom all hearts appoint the Honorable BILL CASSIDY, a Sen- incident occurred just days into his are opened, all desires known, and from ator from the State of Louisiana, to perform new position. The Chief inherits an the duties of the Chair. whom no secrets are hidden, we praise able, brave team who works hard every Your Holy Name. You commanded ORRIN G. HATCH, President pro tempore. day to keep us safe. We look forward to light to shine out of darkness and gave continuing our close working relation- Mr. CASSIDY thereupon assumed the us the gift of this day. Lord, we borrow ship with the Capitol Police under his Chair as Acting President pro tempore. our heartbeats from You; great is Your leadership. faithfulness. f Help our lawmakers to take the long f view of their work and to not become RECOGNITION OF THE MAJORITY DEFEND TRADE SECRETS BILL LEADER weary in doing Your will. Teach them Mr. MCCONNELL. Mr. President, to trust Your wisdom, opening their The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- today the Senate will vote on the De- minds to the counsels of Your sacred pore. The Senate majority leader is fend Trade Secrets Act. This bipartisan Word. Give them the graciousness to recognized. legislation can help promote growth of humbly serve one another, following f the economy, help spur the increase Your example of lowliness. Lord, keep and retention of American jobs, and them always within the circle of Your THANKING OUR CAPITOL POLICE help protect American innovation in will. OFFICERS AND WELCOMING the global economy. It aims to do so by We pray in Your loving Name. Amen. CHIEF MATTHEW VERDEROSA providing tools for American compa- f Mr. MCCONNELL. Mr. President, I nies both small and large to effectively PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE welcome our colleagues back from protect some of their most valuable as- their State work periods. The Senate sets in today’s international economy. The Presiding Officer led the Pledge has gotten a lot done under the new American companies spend billions of Allegiance, as follows: majority, and we will continue our every year on research and develop- I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the work today. ment and in the creation of products United States of America, and to the Repub- lic for which it stands, one nation under God, First, I want to remember the daily we use every day. But some thieves indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. sacrifice of our Capitol Police in light would rather not go through the trou- of the incident last Monday. Incidents ble of developing products themselves; f like these remind us of the sacrifices they would rather just steal the fruits APPOINTMENT OF ACTING officers make on our behalf each and of others’ creativity and innovation. PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE every day. These brave men and women That is more than just wrong; it puts The PRESIDING OFFICER. The protect all who work here. They pro- American jobs and the American econ- clerk will please read a communication tect the countless visitors from across omy at risk. ∑ This ‘‘bullet’’ symbol identifies statements or insertions which are not spoken by a Member of the Senate on the floor. S1621 . VerDate Sep 11 2014 01:25 Apr 05, 2016 Jkt 059060 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4637 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A04AP6.000 S04APPT1 smartinez on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with SENATE S1622 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE April 4, 2016 American businesses find themselves TERRORIST THREATS DEFEND TRADE SECRETS BILL increasingly under attack from a so- Mr. MCCONNELL. Mr. President, in Mr. REID. Mr. President, I under- phisticated effort to steal the very recent weeks we have again been re- stand why my friend the Republican things that give them a competitive minded of the pervasive threat posed leader is doing everything he can to edge in the 21st-century economy— by Islamic terrorists to the world. We shine a bright light on the Judiciary things such as codes, formulas, and have seen ghastly images in places as Committee. It is kind of hard to do confidential manufacturing processes. diverse as Brussels, Yemen, and La- that considering everything that is While it has never been easier for these hore. Attacks seem to be coming near- going on today. The bill that we will thieves to launch attacks on innova- ly weekly now, and it feels as if we vote on at 5:30 p.m. would have passed tion, sometimes armed with little more hear of a new one almost every time we with unanimous consent, and every- than a jump drive, many American flip on the news. body knows that. We don’t need to businesses now find themselves less Over the weekend, the chairman of take up the Senate’s time on a bill that able to protect their important assets the Intelligence Committee delivered would pass just like that. We are doing under current law. an address focused on the threat facing it because it focuses less attention on Senator HATCH knew we had to do us and what we can ultimately do to the inadequacy of the Judiciary Com- something about this. He knew it was overcome it. Senator BURR noted that mittee. The Defend Trade Secrets Act time to modernize our trade secret he could not remember a time when was easily reported out of committee. laws to keep pace with rapid advances the United States and its allies faced a There were no problems. It was a bill in technology and in criminal tech- greater array of threats across the on which everybody agreed. There may niques. He knew it was time to stream- world, which is why, as he put it, ‘‘we be some reasons for it, but I don’t see line and simplify the process for U.S. cannot simply focus our efforts on how why the Judiciary Committee should companies to effectively defend Amer- to best respond to attacks once they’ve be given a few pats on the back. The ican jobs, American growth, and the already happened.’’ Senator BURR problem is that the committee does not American innovation that is increas- spoke on the significance of working deserve any pats on the back at this ingly at the heart of our modern econ- with our allies to target threats at stage. every level. He talked about the impor- omy. Senator HATCH worked across the JUDICIAL NOMINATIONS tance of ensuring that law enforcement aisle with Senator COONS to develop Mr. REID. Mr. President, as U.S. the Defend Trade Secrets Act. This bi- has the tools and authorities needed to Senators we have a constitutional obli- keep Americans safe. He also under- partisan legislation eventually gained gation to consider nominees to impor- lined the need for President Obama to the cosponsorship of a majority of the tant positions. That is one of our con- do more in directly taking on ISIL and Senate. stitutional responsibilities. Judges made clear that doing so would require play an essential role in our society, This bipartisan legislation also leadership that reached beyond the ad- and we should give qualified nominees passed the Judiciary Committee unani- ministration’s current containment the fair shot they deserve. Sadly, the mously. That is impressive, and it strategy. Republican Senate has refused to do its wouldn’t have happened without the It is clear that defeating ISIL, Al job. They have a new standard: Unless able leadership of the chairman of that Qaeda, and its affiliates will require the judge-to-be passes the test on the committee, Senator GRASSLEY from concerted action by our military, the National Rifle Association, as stated Iowa. Since the new majority took of- intelligence community, and inter- by the Republican leader on national fice, Senator GRASSLEY has been a national partners around the globe. TV, they can’t vote for him. highly effective legislator as chairman That is why we have continued to press The Judiciary Committee has been of the Judiciary Committee. From the administration for a serious plan to hammered—and that is an understate- comprehensive legislation to address defeat these terrorist groups and not ment—day after day in the State of America’s opioid epidemic, to pro- simply attempt to contain them. In ad- Iowa, the home State of the chairman dition to the ongoing air campaign, the tecting the victims of modern slavery, of the committee.
Recommended publications
  • Appendix File Anes 1988‐1992 Merged Senate File

    Appendix File Anes 1988‐1992 Merged Senate File

    Version 03 Codebook ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ CODEBOOK APPENDIX FILE ANES 1988‐1992 MERGED SENATE FILE USER NOTE: Much of his file has been converted to electronic format via OCR scanning. As a result, the user is advised that some errors in character recognition may have resulted within the text. MASTER CODES: The following master codes follow in this order: PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE CAMPAIGN ISSUES MASTER CODES CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP CODE ELECTIVE OFFICE CODE RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE MASTER CODE SENATOR NAMES CODES CAMPAIGN MANAGERS AND POLLSTERS CAMPAIGN CONTENT CODES HOUSE CANDIDATES CANDIDATE CODES >> VII. MASTER CODES ‐ Survey Variables >> VII.A. Party/Candidate ('Likes/Dislikes') ? PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PEOPLE WITHIN PARTY 0001 Johnson 0002 Kennedy, John; JFK 0003 Kennedy, Robert; RFK 0004 Kennedy, Edward; "Ted" 0005 Kennedy, NA which 0006 Truman 0007 Roosevelt; "FDR" 0008 McGovern 0009 Carter 0010 Mondale 0011 McCarthy, Eugene 0012 Humphrey 0013 Muskie 0014 Dukakis, Michael 0015 Wallace 0016 Jackson, Jesse 0017 Clinton, Bill 0031 Eisenhower; Ike 0032 Nixon 0034 Rockefeller 0035 Reagan 0036 Ford 0037 Bush 0038 Connally 0039 Kissinger 0040 McCarthy, Joseph 0041 Buchanan, Pat 0051 Other national party figures (Senators, Congressman, etc.) 0052 Local party figures (city, state, etc.) 0053 Good/Young/Experienced leaders; like whole ticket 0054 Bad/Old/Inexperienced leaders; dislike whole ticket 0055 Reference to vice‐presidential candidate ? Make 0097 Other people within party reasons Card PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PARTY CHARACTERISTICS 0101 Traditional Democratic voter: always been a Democrat; just a Democrat; never been a Republican; just couldn't vote Republican 0102 Traditional Republican voter: always been a Republican; just a Republican; never been a Democrat; just couldn't vote Democratic 0111 Positive, personal, affective terms applied to party‐‐good/nice people; patriotic; etc.
  • US Policy Scan 2021

    US Policy Scan 2021

    US Policy Scan 2021 1 • US Policy Scan 2021 Introduction Welcome to Dentons 2021 Policy Scan, an in-depth look at policy a number of Members of Congress and Senators on both sides of at the Federal level and in each of the 50 states. This document the aisle and with a public exhausted by the anger and overheated is meant to be both a resource and a guide. A preview of the rhetoric that has characterized the last four years. key policy questions for the next year in the states, the House of Representatives, the Senate and the new Administration. A Nonetheless, with a Congress closely divided between the parties resource for tracking the people who will be driving change. and many millions of people who even now question the basic legitimacy of the process that led to Biden’s election, it remains to In addition to a dive into more than 15 policy areas, you will find be determined whether the President-elect’s goals are achievable brief profiles of Biden cabinet nominees and senior White House or whether, going forward, the Trump years have fundamentally staff appointees, the Congressional calendar, as well as the and permanently altered the manner in which political discourse Session dates and policy previews in State Houses across the will be conducted. What we can say with total confidence is that, in country. We discuss redistricting, preview the 2022 US Senate such a politically charged environment, it will take tremendous skill races and provide an overview of key decided and pending cases and determination on the part of the President-elect, along with a before the Supreme Court of the United States.
  • Entire Issue (PDF)

    Entire Issue (PDF)

    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 114 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 162 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, MARCH 17, 2016 No. 43 House of Representatives The House met at 9 a.m. and was point of order that a quorum is not Gunny Stanton first began his train- called to order by the Speaker. present. ing, he attended the basic EOD course f The SPEAKER. Pursuant to clause 8, at Eglin Air Force Base. While in train- rule XX, further proceedings on this ing, his block tests and final examina- PRAYER question will be postponed. tion scores were so high that his The Chaplain, the Reverend Patrick The point of no quorum is considered records remain intact to this day. J. Conroy, offered the following prayer: withdrawn. In the course of his 18 years in the Marine Corps, Stanton earned many Merciful God, thank You for giving f us another day. awards too numerous to list in this Your care and wisdom are shown to PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE space. He is preceded in death by his fa- us by the way You extend Your king- The SPEAKER. Will the gentleman ther, Michael Dale Stanton Sr.; and a dom into our world down to the present from Texas (Mr. VEASEY) come forward brother, Brian Stanton. Gunny Stanton day. Your word reveals every aspect of and lead the House in the Pledge of Al- is survived by his loving family: his Your saving plan. You accomplish Your legiance. wife, Terri Stanton; his mother, Gloria designed purpose in and through the Mr.
  • Ranking Member John Barrasso

    Ranking Member John Barrasso

    Senate Committee Musical Chairs August 15, 2018 Key Retiring Committee Seniority over Sitting Chair/Ranking Member Viewed as Seat Republicans Will Most Likely Retain Viewed as Potentially At Risk Republican Seat Viewed as Republican Seat at Risk Viewed as Seat Democrats Will Most Likely Retain Viewed as Potentially At Risk Democratic Seat Viewed as Democratic Seat at Risk Notes • The Senate Republican leader is not term-limited; Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY) will likely remain majority leader. The only member of Senate GOP leadership who is currently term-limited is Republican Whip John Cornyn (R-TX). • Republicans have term limits of six years as chairman and six years as ranking member. Republican members can only use seniority to bump sitting chairs/ranking members when the control of the Senate switches parties. • Committee leadership for the Senate Aging; Agriculture; Appropriations; Banking; Environment and Public Works (EPW); Health Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP); Indian Affairs; Intelligence; Rules; and Veterans Affairs Committees are unlikely to change. Notes • Current Armed Services Committee (SASC) Chairman John McCain (R-AZ) continues to receive treatment for brain cancer in Arizona. Senator James Inhofe (R-OK) has served as acting chairman and is likely to continue to do so in Senator McCain’s absence. If Republicans lose control of the Senate, Senator McCain would lose his top spot on the committee because he already has six years as ranking member. • In the unlikely scenario that Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) does not take over the Finance Committee, Senator Mike Crapo (R-ID), who currently serves as Chairman of the Banking Committee, could take over the Finance Committee.
  • The Senate in Transition Or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Nuclear Option1

    The Senate in Transition Or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Nuclear Option1

    \\jciprod01\productn\N\NYL\19-4\NYL402.txt unknown Seq: 1 3-JAN-17 6:55 THE SENATE IN TRANSITION OR HOW I LEARNED TO STOP WORRYING AND LOVE THE NUCLEAR OPTION1 William G. Dauster* The right of United States Senators to debate without limit—and thus to filibuster—has characterized much of the Senate’s history. The Reid Pre- cedent, Majority Leader Harry Reid’s November 21, 2013, change to a sim- ple majority to confirm nominations—sometimes called the “nuclear option”—dramatically altered that right. This article considers the Senate’s right to debate, Senators’ increasing abuse of the filibuster, how Senator Reid executed his change, and possible expansions of the Reid Precedent. INTRODUCTION .............................................. 632 R I. THE NATURE OF THE SENATE ........................ 633 R II. THE FOUNDERS’ SENATE ............................. 637 R III. THE CLOTURE RULE ................................. 639 R IV. FILIBUSTER ABUSE .................................. 641 R V. THE REID PRECEDENT ............................... 645 R VI. CHANGING PROCEDURE THROUGH PRECEDENT ......... 649 R VII. THE CONSTITUTIONAL OPTION ........................ 656 R VIII. POSSIBLE REACTIONS TO THE REID PRECEDENT ........ 658 R A. Republican Reaction ............................ 659 R B. Legislation ...................................... 661 R C. Supreme Court Nominations ..................... 670 R D. Discharging Committees of Nominations ......... 672 R E. Overruling Home-State Senators ................. 674 R F. Overruling the Minority Leader .................. 677 R G. Time To Debate ................................ 680 R CONCLUSION................................................ 680 R * Former Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy for U.S. Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid. The author has worked on U.S. Senate and White House staffs since 1986, including as Staff Director or Deputy Staff Director for the Committees on the Budget, Labor and Human Resources, and Finance.
  • The Honorable Orrin Hatch the Honorable Ron Wyden Chairman Ranking Member United States Senate Committee on Finance United State

    The Honorable Orrin Hatch the Honorable Ron Wyden Chairman Ranking Member United States Senate Committee on Finance United State

    The Honorable Orrin Hatch The Honorable Ron Wyden Chairman Ranking Member United States Senate Committee on Finance United States Senate Committee on Finance Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20510 The Honorable Greg Walden The Honorable Frank Pallone Chairman Ranking Member United States House Committee on United State House Committee on Energy & Commerce Energy and Commerce Washington, DC 20515 Washington, DC 20515 October 5, 2018 Dear Chairmen Hatch and Walden and Ranking Members Wyden and Pallone: On behalf of Nemours Children’s Health System (Nemours), I am writing to thank you for your commitment to addressing the opioid epidemic and particularly for your work on the conferenced opioid bill (H.R.6). We especially appreciate your inclusion of Sec. 1005, which addresses Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services guidance related to Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS), as well as Sec. 1009, which addresses the provision of telehealth for substance use disorder, including in school based health centers. We appreciate the dedication of your staff in prioritizing the needs of the pediatric population. As you know, there is not currently consistency in terminology, delivery models and coding regarding NAS. Additionally, especially given the cost to Medicaid, there is great opportunity for states to learn from one another regarding payment models to test. The additional guidance and technical assistance included in Section 1005 of H.R. 6 will provide further clarity and assist in the dissemination of emerging best practices. Additionally, emerging evidence suggests that providing mental health services in schools is an effective way to identify and reach children with mental health needs, and that telehealth can be an effective tool in expanding access to mental health services.i Given that nearly half of Medicaid beneficiaries are children, the provisions in Section 1009 of H.R.
  • United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island

    United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island

    Case 1:20-cv-00302-WES-LDA Document 8 Filed 07/22/21 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: <pageID> UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND ______________________________ ) FELIPE DUBON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 20-302 WES ) MERRICK GARLAND1, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ______________________________) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 5. Plaintiff filed this instant action after Defendants denied his Form I-212 Application for Permission to Reapply for Admission into the United States After Deportation or Removal. Compl. ¶ 1, ECF No. 1. He asks that this Court compel Defendants to “re- adjudicate his Form I-212” as it was “improperly decided.” Id. Defendants move to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), 12(b)(3), and 12(b)6). For the reasons set forth below, the Court will GRANT the Defendants’ 12(b)(1) motion and dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction. Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction and require a jurisdictional prerequisite, which “implicates a court’s 1 Merrick Garland is now the United States Attorney General. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d), U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland has been substituted for U.S. Attorney General William Barr as Defendant. Case 1:20-cv-00302-WES-LDA Document 8 Filed 07/22/21 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: <pageID> constitutional and statutory power to hear and resolve a case.” Alphas Co., Inc. v. William H. Kopke, Jr., Inc., 708 F.3d 33, 36 (1st Cir. 2013). It is the plaintiff’s burden to prove this jurisdictional prerequisite and establish that the court has subject matter jurisdiction.
  • August 25, 2021 the Honorable Merrick Garland Attorney General

    August 25, 2021 the Honorable Merrick Garland Attorney General

    MARK BRNOVICH DAVE YOST ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL August 25, 2021 The Honorable Merrick Garland Attorney General 950 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington, DC 20530-0001 Re: Constitutionality of Illegal Reentry Criminal Statute, 8 U.S.C. § 1326 Dear Attorney General Garland, We, the undersigned attorneys general, write as chief legal officers of our States to inquire about your intent to appeal the decision in United States v. Carrillo-Lopez, No. 3:20-cr- 00026-MMD-WGC, ECF. 60 (D. Nev. Aug. 18, 2021). As you know, in that decision, Chief Judge Du found unconstitutional 8 U.S.C. § 1326, the statute that criminalizes the illegal reentry of previously removed aliens. We appreciate that you recently filed a notice of appeal, preserving your ability to defend the law on appeal. We now urge you to follow through by defending the law before the Ninth Circuit and (if necessary) the Supreme Court. We ask that you confirm expeditiously DOJ’s intent to do so. Alternatively, if you do not intend to seek reversal of that decision and instead decide to cease prosecutions for illegal reentry in some or all of the country, we ask that you let us know, in writing, so that the undersigned can take appropriate action. Section 1326, as part of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, is unremarkable in that it requires all aliens—no matter their race or country of origin—to enter the country lawfully. In finding the law racially discriminatory against “Latinx persons,” Chief Judge Du made some truly astounding claims, especially considering that, under the Immigration and Nationality Act, Mexico has more legal permanent residents in the United States, by far, than any other country.1 Chief Judge Du determined that, because most illegal reentrants at the border are from Mexico, the law has an impermissible “disparate impact” on Mexicans.
  • The Nomination of Chief Judge Merrick B. Garland to the Supreme Court of the United States

    The Nomination of Chief Judge Merrick B. Garland to the Supreme Court of the United States

    THE NOMINATION OF CHIEF JUDGE MERRICK B. GARLAND TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES A REPORT BY THE NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. MAY 6, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................... 3 Background .................................................................................................................... 6 Early Life, Education, and Clerkships ...................................................................... 6 Private Practice and Initial Government Service ..................................................... 6 Clinton Justice Department ...................................................................................... 8 Nomination to the D.C. Circuit ............................................................................... 10 Service as a Judge .................................................................................................... 11 Employment and Housing Discrimination ................................................................. 13 Employment Discrimination .................................................................................... 13 Notable Cases ....................................................................................................... 13 Mixed Rulings ....................................................................................................... 18 Reversals ..............................................................................................................
  • The Orrin Hatch – Bob Goodlatte Music Modernization Act

    The Orrin Hatch – Bob Goodlatte Music Modernization Act

    The Orrin Hatch – Bob Goodlatte Music Modernization Act A Guide for Sound Recordings Collectors This study was written by Eric Harbeson, on behalf of and commissioned by the National Recording Preservation Board. Members of the National Recording Preservation Board American Federation of Musicians National Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences Billy Linneman Maureen Droney Alternate: Daryl Friedman American Folklore Society Burt Feintuch (in memoriam) National Archives and Records Administration Alternate: Timothy Lloyd Daniel Rooney Alternate: Tom Nastick American Musicological Society Judy Tsou Recording Industry Association of America Alternate: Patrick Warfield David Hughes Alternate: Patrick Kraus American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers SESAC Elizabeth Matthews John JosePhson Alternate: John Titta Alternate: Eric Lense Association for Recorded Sound Collections Society For Ethnomusicology David Seubert Jonathan Kertzer Alternate: Bill Klinger Alternate: Alan Burdette Audio Engineering Society Songwriters Hall of Fame George Massenburg Linda Moran Alternate: Elizabeth Cohen Alternate: Robbin Ahrold Broadcast Music, Incorporated At-Large Michael O'Neill Michael Feinstein Alternate: Michael Collins At-Large Country Music Foundation Brenda Nelson-Strauss Kyle Young Alternate: Eileen Hayes Alternate: Alan Stoker At-Large Digital Media Association Mickey Hart Garrett Levin Alternate: ChristoPher H. Sterling Alternate: Sally Rose Larson At-Large Music Business Association Bob Santelli Portia Sabin Alternate: Al Pryor Alternate: Paul JessoP At-Large Music Library Association Eric Schwartz James Farrington Alternate: John Simson Alternate: Maristella Feustle Abstract: The Music Modernization Act is reviewed in detail, with a Particular eye toward the implications for members of the community suPPorted by the National Recording Preservation Board, including librarians, archivists, and Private collectors. The guide attemPts an exhaustive treatment using Plain but legally precise language.
  • CHAIRMEN of SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–Present

    CHAIRMEN of SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–Present

    CHAIRMEN OF SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–present INTRODUCTION The following is a list of chairmen of all standing Senate committees, as well as the chairmen of select and joint committees that were precursors to Senate committees. (Other special and select committees of the twentieth century appear in Table 5-4.) Current standing committees are highlighted in yellow. The names of chairmen were taken from the Congressional Directory from 1816–1991. Four standing committees were founded before 1816. They were the Joint Committee on ENROLLED BILLS (established 1789), the joint Committee on the LIBRARY (established 1806), the Committee to AUDIT AND CONTROL THE CONTINGENT EXPENSES OF THE SENATE (established 1807), and the Committee on ENGROSSED BILLS (established 1810). The names of the chairmen of these committees for the years before 1816 were taken from the Annals of Congress. This list also enumerates the dates of establishment and termination of each committee. These dates were taken from Walter Stubbs, Congressional Committees, 1789–1982: A Checklist (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1985). There were eleven committees for which the dates of existence listed in Congressional Committees, 1789–1982 did not match the dates the committees were listed in the Congressional Directory. The committees are: ENGROSSED BILLS, ENROLLED BILLS, EXAMINE THE SEVERAL BRANCHES OF THE CIVIL SERVICE, Joint Committee on the LIBRARY OF CONGRESS, LIBRARY, PENSIONS, PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS, RETRENCHMENT, REVOLUTIONARY CLAIMS, ROADS AND CANALS, and the Select Committee to Revise the RULES of the Senate. For these committees, the dates are listed according to Congressional Committees, 1789– 1982, with a note next to the dates detailing the discrepancy.
  • Hon. Merrick Garland Attorney General of the United States United States Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C

    Hon. Merrick Garland Attorney General of the United States United States Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C

    Hon. Merrick Garland Attorney General of the United States United States Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20530 July 9, 2020 Re: Support for Granting Clemency to Individuals Placed on Home Confinement Pursuant the CARES Act Dear Attorney General Garland: I write on behalf of Law Enforcement Leaders to Reduce Crime & Incarceration, a national coalition including over 200 current and former law enforcement officials, across the political spectrum, dedicated to protecting public safety and reducing unnecessary incarceration. We are deeply troubled by the U.S. Department of Justice’s (“DOJ”) inaction as it pertains to the approximately 4,500 individuals who face the threat of reincarceration due to the prior administration’s January 15, 2021, Office of Legal Counsel memo (“OLC memo”). The OLC memo advises that these individuals — placed on home confinement pursuant the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (“CARES”) Act — be returned to full custody in federal prison upon the end of the COVID-19 pandemic.1 For the reasons outlined below, we respectfully urge the DOJ to recommend that President Biden grant clemency to these individuals, who have already been safely returned to their communities.2 Enacted by Congress in March of 2020, the CARES Act granted the Attorney General emergency authority to expand home confinement as long as emergency conditions “materially affect” the functioning of the Bureau of Prisons (BOP).3 As a result, Attorney General Bill Barr directed the BOP to place eligible incarcerated