DOCSLIB.ORG

Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 01/01/2009 to 03/31/2009 Wallowa-Whitman National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring in more than one Region (excluding Nationwide) 01/01/2009 Page 1 of 19 Wallowa-Whitman National Forest Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring in more than one Region (excluding Nationwide) Geothermal Leasing - Regulations, Directives, In Progress: Expected:12/2008 02/2009 Peter Gaulke Programmatic Environmental Orders DEIS NOA in Federal Register 703-605-4796 Impact Statement 06/13/2008 [email protected] EIS Est. FEIS NOA in Federal Register 10/2008 Description: The Bureau of Land Management and Forest Service are preparing a joint Programmatic Environmental Impac Statement to analyze the leasing of BLM and USFS administered lands with moderate to high potential for geothermal resources in 11 western states. Web Link: http://www.blm.gov/wo/st/en/prog/energy/geothermal/geothermal_nationwide.html Location: UNIT - Clearwater National Forest All Units, Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest All Units, Bitterroot National Forest All Units, Lewis And Clark National Forest All Units, Medicine Bow-Routt National Forest All Units, San Juan National Forest All Units, White River National Forest All Units, Carson National Forest All Units, Cibola National Forest All Units, Coronado National Forest All Units, Gila National Forest All Units, Lincoln National Forest All Units, Boise National Forest All Units, Bridger-Teton National Forest All Units, Dixie National Forest All Units, Fishlake National Forest All Units, Payette National Forest All Units, Salmon-Challis National Forest All Units, Sawtooth National Forest All Units, Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest All Units, Uinta National Forest All Units, Cleveland National Forest All Units, Eldorado National Forest All Units, Lassen National Forest All Units, Los Padres National Forest All Units, Mendocino National Forest All Units, Modoc National Forest All Units, San Bernardino National Forest All Units, Sequoia National Forest All Units, Tahoe National Forest All Units, Gifford Pinchot National Forest All Units, Malheur National Forest All Units, Mt Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest All Units, Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest All Units, Umpqua National Forest All Units, Wallowa-Whitman National Forest All Units, Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest All Units, Willamette National Forest All Units, R10 - Alaska Region All Units, Custer National Forest All Units, Rio Grande National Forest All Units, Apache- Sitgreaves National Forests All Units, Wasatch-Cache National Forest All Units, Klamath National Forest All Units, Sierra National Forest All Units, Ochoco National Forest All Units, Gallatin National Forest All Units, Helena National Forest All Units, Grand Mesa Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forest All Units, Santa Fe National Forest All Units, Angeles National Forest All Units, Plumas National Forest All Units, Fremont-Winema National Forest All Units, Umatilla National Forest All Units, Lolo National Forest All Units, Nez Perce National Forest All Units, Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests All Units, Manti-Lasal National Forest All Units, Caribou-Targhee National Forest All Units, Shasta Trinity National Forest All Units, Deschutes National Forest All Units, Mt. Hood National Forest All Units, Tonto National Forest All Units, Inyo National Forest All Units, Pike and San Isabel National Forests and Cimarron and Comanche National Grasslands All Units, Washington Office (National Headquarter). STATE - Wyoming, Washington, Utah, Texas, South Dakota, Oregon, Oklahoma, North Dakota, New Mexico, Nevada, Nebraska, Montana, Kansas, Idaho, District of Columbia, Colorado, California, Arizona, Alaska. COUNTY - Aleutians East, La Paz, Colusa, Denver, Douglas, Bonner, Columbia, Coos. 11 contiguous Western States (Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, New Mexico, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming) and Alaska. 01/01/2009 Page 2 of 19 Wallowa-Whitman National Forest Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Wallowa-Whitman National Forest, Forestwide (excluding Projects occurring in more than one Forest) R6 - Pacific Northwest Region Wallowa-Whitman National - Vegetation management In Progress: Expected:07/2009 09/2009 Robert Rock Forest Invasive Plants (other than forest products) NOI in Federal Register 541-523-1242 Treatment 04/13/2006 [email protected] EIS Est. DEIS NOA in Federal Register 02/2009 Description: Treatment of known and newly discovered invasive plants using herbicide, manual, mechanical, biological, and/or cultural methods. The Forest has approx. 25,000 acres of invasive plants. Location: UNIT - Wallowa-Whitman National Forest All Units. STATE - Oregon, Idaho. COUNTY - Adams, Idaho, Nez Perce, Baker, Grant, Malheur, Umatilla, Union, Wallowa. LEGAL - Forest wide. All areas under the administration of the Wallow-Whitman National Forest. Wallowa-Whitman National Forest, Occurring in more than one District (excluding Forestwide) R6 - Pacific Northwest Region Recreation Residences - Special area management In Progress: Expected:12/2008 01/2009 Mike Hall Special-Use Permit Renewals 215 Comment Period Legal 541-523-1294 EA Notice 03/05/2007 [email protected] Description: Re-issue special use permits for 43 summer homes located on the Whitman Unit (Baker) and La Grande District. Location: UNIT - La Grande Ranger District, Whitman Ranger District. STATE - Oregon. COUNTY - Baker, Union. Floodwater Flats (Anthony Lakes), Boulder Park (Eagle Creek), and Blue Springs (Grande Ronde River) Summer Home Tracts. W-W National Forest Travel - Recreation management In Progress: Expected:10/2009 01/2010 Cindy Whitlock Management Plan NOI in Federal Register 541-962-8501 EIS 05/03/2007 [email protected] Est. DEIS NOA in Federal Register 04/2009 Description: Comprehensive plan for motorized recreation on the Wallowa-Whitman National Forest (except for HCNRA). Will include designated routes for all motorized vehicles except snowmobiles. Web Link: http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/w-w/recreation/ohv/index.shtml Location: UNIT - Wallowa Valley Ranger District, La Grande Ranger District, Whitman Ranger District. STATE - Oregon. COUNTY - Baker, Grant, Umatilla, Union, Wallowa. Wallowa-Whitman National Forest. 01/01/2009 Page 3 of 19 Wallowa-Whitman National Forest Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Wallowa-Whitman National Forest, Occurring in more than one District (excluding Forestwide) R6 - Pacific Northwest Region Wallowa-Whitman National - Land acquisition In Progress: Expected:09/2009 10/2009 Alicia Glassford Forest Compound Scoping Start 03/12/2008 541-426-5689 Conveyances Est. 215 Comment Period Legal [email protected] EA Notice 03/2009 Description: Convey three federally owned compounds along with their associated lots and buildings, under the Forest Service Facility Realignment and Enhancement Act of 2005 or the Education Land Grant Act of 2000. Location: UNIT - Eagle Cap Ranger District, Whitman Ranger District. STATE - Oregon. COUNTY - Baker, Wallowa. LEGAL - T1N R42E, Section 14; T13S R37E, Section 16; WM. Wallowa Compound, Middle Unity Compound, Lower Unity Compound. Wallowa-Whitman National Forest La Grande Ranger District (excluding Projects occurring in more than one District) R6 - Pacific Northwest Region NF Catherine Creek Ford- - Wildlife, Fish, Rare plants Developing Proposal Expected:09/2009 06/2010 Cindy Whitlock Passage Restoration Est. Scoping Start 06/2009 541-962-8501 CE [email protected] Description: Design and replacement of the ford across NF Catherine Creek. Location: UNIT - La Grande Ranger District. STATE - Oregon. COUNTY - Union. LEGAL - NF Catherine Creek Subwatersheds 170601040501 & 170601040108. North Fork Catherine Creek. 2007 Range Improvements - Grazing management In Progress: Expected:01/2009 06/2009 Cindy Whitlock CE Scoping Start 01/15/2007 541-962-8501 [email protected] Description: Construction of exclosure fencing on approximately 1 mile of Little Indian Creek, 0.75 miles of Corral Creek with 2 cattleguards, spring development off site on Alder Creek. Location: UNIT - La Grande Ranger District. STATE - Oregon. COUNTY - Union. LEGAL - T2S., R40E., Sections 10 and 15; T2S., R42E., Sections 21 and 28; T6S.,R42E., Section 33. Little Indian Creek, Corral Creek, Alder Creek. 2008 Timber Stand - Vegetation management Completed Actual: 10/29/2008 06/2009 Cindy Whitlock Improvement (other than forest products) 541-962-8501 CE [email protected] Description: Release thinning of non-commercial size trees. Thin small diameter trees to favor preferred species at spacing designed to stimulate growth of residual trees. Location: UNIT - La Grande Ranger District. STATE - Oregon. COUNTY - Union. LEGAL - T1S., R41E., & T2S, R40E & R41E. Camp Creek and Camp Out areas. 01/01/2009 Page 4 of 19 Wallowa-Whitman National Forest Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Wallowa-Whitman National Forest La Grande Ranger District (excluding Projects occurring in more than one District) R6 - Pacific Northwest Region 2009 Eastside Range - Grazing management Developing Proposal Expected:01/2009 04/2009
Recommended publications
  • Building 27, Suite 3 Fort Missoula Road Missoula, MT 59804

    Building 27, Suite 3 Fort Missoula Road Missoula, MT 59804

    Photo by Louis Kamler. www.nationalforests.org Building 27, Suite 3 Fort Missoula Road Missoula, MT 59804 Printed on recycled paper 2013 ANNUAL REPORT Island Lake, Eldorado National Forest Desolation Wilderness. Photo by Adam Braziel. 1 We are pleased to present the National Forest Foundation’s (NFF) Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2013. During this fourth year of the Treasured Landscapes campaign, we have reached $86 million in both public and private support towards our $100 million campaign goal. In this year’s report, you can read about the National Forests comprising the centerpieces of our work. While these landscapes merit special attention, they are really emblematic of the entire National Forest System consisting of 155 National Forests and 20 National Grasslands. he historical context for these diverse and beautiful Working to protect all of these treasured landscapes, landscapes is truly inspirational. The century-old to ensure that they are maintained to provide renewable vision to put forests in a public trust to secure their resources and high quality recreation experiences, is National Forest Foundation 2013 Annual Report values for the future was an effort so bold in the late at the core of the NFF’s mission. Adding value to the 1800’s and early 1900’s that today it seems almost mission of our principal partner, the Forest Service, is impossible to imagine. While vestiges of past resistance what motivates and challenges the NFF Board and staff. to the public lands concept live on in the present, Connecting people and places reflects our organizational the American public today overwhelmingly supports values and gives us a sense of pride in telling the NFF maintaining these lands and waters in public ownership story of success to those who generously support for the benefit of all.
  • Notices Federal Register Vol

    Notices Federal Register Vol

    60272 Notices Federal Register Vol. 70, No. 199 Monday, October 17, 2005 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER coordinated implementation of the agenda for the public to speak to the contains documents other than rules or Record of Decision (ROD) of April 13, general body. proposed rules that are applicable to the 1994, for Management of Habitat for Renewal of the PACs does not require public. Notices of hearings and investigations, Late-Successional and Old-Growth an amendment of Bureau of Land committee meetings, agency decisions and Forest Related Species Within the Range Management or Forest Service planning rulings, delegations of authority, filing of documents because the renewal does petitions and applications and agency of the Northern Spotted Owl. The PIEC statements of organization and functions are consists of representatives of the not affect the standards and guidelines examples of documents appearing in this following Federal agencies: Forest or land allocations. The Bureau of Land section. Service, Natural Resources Conservation Management and Forest Service will Service, Bureau of Indian Affairs, provide further notice, as needed, for Bureau of Land Management, National additional actions or adjustments when DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Marine Fisheries Service, National Park implementing interagency coordination, Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, public involvement, and other aspects Office of the Secretary Geological Survey Biological Resources of the ROD. Division, Environmental Protection Equal opportunity practices will be Provincial Advisory Committees Agency, and U.S. Army Corps of followed in all appointments to the AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, USDA. Engineers. advisory committee. To ensure that the recommendations of the PACs have ACTION: Notice of intent to renew Ecosystem management at the taken into account the needs of diverse Federal Advisory Committee.
  • Gila National Forest Fact Sheet

    Gila National Forest Fact Sheet

    CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY Because life is good. GILA NATIONAL FOREST The Gila National Forest occupies 3.3 million acres in southwestern New Mexico and is home to the Mexican spotted owl, Mexican gray wolf, Gila chub, southwestern willow flycatcher, loach minnow, and spikedace. The forest also encompasses the San Francisco, Gila, and Mimbres Rivers, and the scenic Burros Mountains. In the 1920s, conservation pioneer Aldo Leopold persuaded the Forest Service to set aside more than half a million acres of the Gila River’s headwaters as wilderness. This wild land became the nation’s first designated wilderness Photo © Robin Silver — the Gila Wilderness Area — in 1924. The Gila National Forest is home to threatened Mexican spotted owls and many other imperiled species. n establishing the Gila Wilderness Area, the Gila The Gila National Forest’s plan by the numbers: National Forest set a precedent for protection Iof our public lands. Sadly, it appears that • 114,000: number of acres of land open to safeguarding the Gila for the enjoyment of future continued destruction; generations is no longer management’s top priority. • 4,764: number of miles of proposed motorized On September 11, 2009, the Gila National Forest roads and trails in the Gila National Forest, equal to released its travel-management plan, one of the worst the distance from Hawaii to the North Pole; plans developed for southwestern forests. Pressure • $7 million: road maintenance backlog accumulated from vocal off-road vehicle users has overwhelmed the by the Gila National Forest; Forest Service, which has lost sight of its duty to protect • less than 3 percent: proportion of forest visitors this land for future generations.
  • IMBCR Report

    IMBCR Report

    Integrated Monitoring in Bird Conservation Regions (IMBCR): 2015 Field Season Report June 2016 Bird Conservancy of the Rockies 14500 Lark Bunting Lane Brighton, CO 80603 303-659-4348 www.birdconservancy.org Tech. Report # SC-IMBCR-06 Bird Conservancy of the Rockies Connecting people, birds and land Mission: Conserving birds and their habitats through science, education and land stewardship Vision: Native bird populations are sustained in healthy ecosystems Bird Conservancy of the Rockies conserves birds and their habitats through an integrated approach of science, education and land stewardship. Our work radiates from the Rockies to the Great Plains, Mexico and beyond. Our mission is advanced through sound science, achieved through empowering people, realized through stewardship and sustained through partnerships. Together, we are improving native bird populations, the land and the lives of people. Core Values: 1. Science provides the foundation for effective bird conservation. 2. Education is critical to the success of bird conservation. 3. Stewardship of birds and their habitats is a shared responsibility. Goals: 1. Guide conservation action where it is needed most by conducting scientifically rigorous monitoring and research on birds and their habitats within the context of their full annual cycle. 2. Inspire conservation action in people by developing relationships through community outreach and science-based, experiential education programs. 3. Contribute to bird population viability and help sustain working lands by partnering with landowners and managers to enhance wildlife habitat. 4. Promote conservation and inform land management decisions by disseminating scientific knowledge and developing tools and recommendations. Suggested Citation: White, C. M., M. F. McLaren, N. J.
  • LIGHTNING FIRES in SOUTHWESTERN FORESTS T

    LIGHTNING FIRES in SOUTHWESTERN FORESTS T

    This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. LIGHTNING FIRES IN SOUTHWESTERN FORESTS t . I I LIGHT~ING FIRES IN SOUTHWESTERN FORESTS (l) by Jack S. Barrows Department of Forest and Wood Sciences College of Forestry and Natural Resources Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523 (1) Research performed for Northern Forest Fire Laboratory, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station under cooperative agreement 16-568 CA with Rocky Mountain For­ est and Range Experiment Station. Final Report May 1978 n LIB RARY COPY. ROCKY MT. FO i-< t:S'f :.. R.l.N~ EX?f.lt!M SN T ST.A.1101'1 . - ... Acknowledgementd r This research of lightning fires in Sop thwestern forests has been ? erformed with the assistan~e and cooperation of many individuals and agencies. The idea for the research was suggested by Dr. Donald M. Fuquay and Robert G. Baughman of the Northern Forest Fire Laboratory. The Fire Management Staff of U. S. Forest Service Region Three provided fire data, maps, rep~rts and briefings on fire p~enomena. Special thanks are expressed to James F. Mann for his continuing assistance in these a ctivities. Several members of national forest staffs assisted in correcting fire report errors. At CSU Joel Hart was the principal graduate 'research assistant in organizing the data, writing computer programs and handling the extensive computer operations. The initial checking of fire data tapes and com­ puter programming was performed by research technician Russell Lewis. Graduate Research Assistant Rick Yancik and Research Associate Lee Bal- ::.
  • Land Areas of the National Forest System, As of September 30, 2019

    Land Areas of the National Forest System, As of September 30, 2019

    United States Department of Agriculture Land Areas of the National Forest System As of September 30, 2019 Forest Service WO Lands FS-383 November 2019 Metric Equivalents When you know: Multiply by: To fnd: Inches (in) 2.54 Centimeters Feet (ft) 0.305 Meters Miles (mi) 1.609 Kilometers Acres (ac) 0.405 Hectares Square feet (ft2) 0.0929 Square meters Yards (yd) 0.914 Meters Square miles (mi2) 2.59 Square kilometers Pounds (lb) 0.454 Kilograms United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Land Areas of the WO, Lands National Forest FS-383 System November 2019 As of September 30, 2019 Published by: USDA Forest Service 1400 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20250-0003 Website: https://www.fs.fed.us/land/staff/lar-index.shtml Cover Photo: Mt. Hood, Mt. Hood National Forest, Oregon Courtesy of: Susan Ruzicka USDA Forest Service WO Lands and Realty Management Statistics are current as of: 10/17/2019 The National Forest System (NFS) is comprised of: 154 National Forests 58 Purchase Units 20 National Grasslands 7 Land Utilization Projects 17 Research and Experimental Areas 28 Other Areas NFS lands are found in 43 States as well as Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. TOTAL NFS ACRES = 192,994,068 NFS lands are organized into: 9 Forest Service Regions 112 Administrative Forest or Forest-level units 503 Ranger District or District-level units The Forest Service administers 149 Wild and Scenic Rivers in 23 States and 456 National Wilderness Areas in 39 States. The Forest Service also administers several other types of nationally designated
  • Fishlake National Forest

    Fishlake National Forest

    FISHLAKE NATIONAL FOREST RESPONSE TO COMMENTS for the FISHLAKE OHV ROUTE DESIGNATION PROJECT 12 October 2006 INTRODUCTION The forest incorporated existing comments from prior public participation processes during the pre- NEPA (NFMA) assessment. The following documents from these efforts are incorporated by reference: Public comments received for the 2001 OHV Event Environmental Assessment for the Rocky Mountain and Fillmore Jamborees. The assessment covered all of the Fishlake and portions of the Dixie and Manti-LaSal National Forests as well as Richfield BLM. OHV and travel management comments received by mail or at public meetings for Forest Plan revision efforts. Meeting notes and final presentations and reports from the Forest Plan revision Topical Working Groups (TWiGs) for OHVs, dispersed camping, and undeveloped area suitability. These records are included in the OHV project file and are incorporated by reference. The Notice of Intent (NOI) for the Fishlake OHV Route Designation Project was published in the Federal Register on June 7, 2004. The NOI included a proposed action (Alternative 2) that designated routes and areas open to motorized use on the Fishlake National Forest. The effect of these designations is to close the forest to unrestricted motorized cross-country travel. The NOI asked for comments on the proposed action by July 30, 2004. Immediately prior to release of the NOI, the Forest Service briefed local governmental officials, motorized advocacy groups, businesses, and environmental groups. The project web site http://www.fs.fed.us/r4/fishlake/projects/ohv.shtml, press release, and postings at some trailheads were used to disseminate information and gather comments.
  • Research Natural Areas on National Forest System Lands in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, and Western Wyoming: a Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and Educators

    Research Natural Areas on National Forest System Lands in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, and Western Wyoming: a Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and Educators

    USDA United States Department of Agriculture Research Natural Areas on Forest Service National Forest System Lands Rocky Mountain Research Station in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, General Technical Report RMRS-CTR-69 Utah, and Western Wyoming: February 2001 A Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and E'ducators Angela G. Evenden Melinda Moeur J. Stephen Shelly Shannon F. Kimball Charles A. Wellner Abstract Evenden, Angela G.; Moeur, Melinda; Shelly, J. Stephen; Kimball, Shannon F.; Wellner, Charles A. 2001. Research Natural Areas on National Forest System Lands in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, and Western Wyoming: A Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and Educators. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-69. Ogden, UT: U.S. Departmentof Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 84 p. This guidebook is intended to familiarize land resource managers, scientists, educators, and others with Research Natural Areas (RNAs) managed by the USDA Forest Service in the Northern Rocky Mountains and lntermountain West. This guidebook facilitates broader recognitionand use of these valuable natural areas by describing the RNA network, past and current research and monitoring, management, and how to use RNAs. About The Authors Angela G. Evenden is biological inventory and monitoring project leader with the National Park Service -NorthernColorado Plateau Network in Moab, UT. She was formerly the Natural Areas Program Manager for the Rocky Mountain Research Station, Northern Region and lntermountain Region of the USDA Forest Service. Melinda Moeur is Research Forester with the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain ResearchStation in Moscow, ID, and one of four Research Natural Areas Coordinators from the Rocky Mountain Research Station. J. Stephen Shelly is Regional Botanist and Research Natural Areas Coordinator with the USDA Forest Service, Northern Region Headquarters Office in Missoula, MT.
  • Grand Teton National Park News Release

    Grand Teton National Park News Release

    National Park Service Grand Teton PO Box 170 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Moose, Wyoming 83012 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Jackie Skaggs/307.739.3393 January 08, 2010 10-01 Grand Teton National Park News Release Environmental Assessment Available for Public Review on Site Work for Grand Teton National Park Headquarters Rehabilitation Project Grand Teton National Park Superintendent Mary Gibson Scott announced today that the Moose Headquarters Rehabilitation Site Work Environmental Assessment (EA) is now available for public review. This EA will be open to review for 30 days, from January 11 through February 9, 2010. The National Park Service (NPS) proposes to perform site improvements that are designed to enhance visitor services and address employee health and safety deficiencies at Grand Teton National Park’s headquarters area in Moose, Wyoming. The site work would restructure vehicle/pedestrian access points, promote better traffic flow, reduce user-created trails and consolidate pedestrian walkways, and improve way-finding throughout the Moose headquarters complex. The purpose of the proposal is to upgrade and improve conditions in a way that enhances visitors’ experiences while providing a safe, healthy, and functional working/living environment for park employees and their families. The NPS preferred alternative involves the reconfiguration of vehicle and pedestrian traffic within the park administrative area and the Moose river landing access, the removal of several temporary buildings, and restoration work targeted at providing appropriate stormwater management. The proposed improvements are designed to increase visitor and employee safety, refine parking and traffic flow patterns, reduce the built environment, and improve water quality while still preserving the character of the area and protecting natural and cultural resources.
  • Nez Perce–Clearwater National Forests Forest Plan Assessment 5.0

    Nez Perce–Clearwater National Forests Forest Plan Assessment 5.0

    Nez Perce–Clearwater National Forests Forest Plan Assessment 5.0 Threatened, Endangered, Proposed, and Candidate Species June 2014 Table of Contents List of Tables ............................................................................................................................ i List of Figures .......................................................................................................................... ii 5.0 Threatened, Endangered, Proposed, and Candidate Species .................................. 5-3 5.1 Wildlife.................................................................................................................... 5-3 5.1.1 Canada Lynx .................................................................................................... 5-3 5.1.2 Wolverine ....................................................................................................... 5-43 5.2 Aquatics ................................................................................................................. 5-52 5.2.1 Existing Information ...................................................................................... 5-52 5.2.2 Informing the Assessment.............................................................................. 5-52 5.2.3 Literature Cited .............................................................................................. 5-64 5.3 Rare Plants............................................................................................................. 5-67 5.3.1 Existing Information .....................................................................................
  • Ashley National Forest Recreation Fee Highlights, 2016

    Ashley National Forest Recreation Fee Highlights, 2016

    United States Department of Agriculture Sawtooth National Forest Credit to Tony Baril 2015 Share the Experience Ashley National Forest Recreation Fee Program Accomplishment Highlights 2016 Repairing the Pump Improving Shoulder Seasons Iron Springs Group Campground is a popular site for family Unloading reunions, Boy Scout vault voilet groups, and youth at Lucerne group outings. One boat ramp. of the water pumps for the water system failed forty feet below ground. Seasonal recreation employees The Lucerne boat ramp is one of the busiest areas used scaffolding and on the Flaming Gorge National Recreation Area Repairing the Iron Springs equipment to remove Campground water system and is used throughout the year. The Forest shuts forty feet of the pump down the water system during winter to prevent assembly to replace the broken valve and return frozen and broken pipes, but leaves the boat ramp potable water to the campground. Campground open. Through leveraging grant funding from Utah recreation fee revenue covered the approximately Division of Wildlife Resources of $17,000 using $3,500 in labor and supplies. $5,000 of recreation fee revenue, the Forest purchased and installed a vault toilet at Lucerne for shoulder season and winter use. Recreation Fee Dollars Recreation fee dollars are an investment The Tale of a Tall Tank in outdoor recreation. They support and enhance: The Buckboard water system is a full treatment system that • Public safety supplies potable water to the campground, boat ramp, marina, • Recreation site maintenance and and RV park. The water storage tank was in need of repairs and improvements maintenance such as new lower access hatch, an overflow • Educational experiences pipe, and repainting the structure to prevent corrosion.
  • National Forest Imagery Catalog Collection at the USDA

    National Forest Imagery Catalog Collection at the USDA

    National Forest Imagery Catalog collection at the USDA - Farm Service Agency Aerial Photography Field Office (APFO) 2222 West 2300 South Salt Lake City, UT 84119-2020 (801) 844-2922 - Customer Service Section (801) 956-3653 - Fax (801) 956-3654 - TDD [email protected] http://www.apfo.usda.gov This catalog listing shows the various photographic coverages used by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and archived at the Aerial Photography Field Office. This catalog references U.S. Forest Service (FS) and other agencies imagery. For imagery prior to 1955, please contact the National Archives & Records Administration: Cartographic & Architectural Reference (NWCS-Cartographic) Aerial Photographs Team http://www.archives.gov/research/order/maps.html#contact Coverage of U.S. Forest Service photography is listed alphabetically for each forest within a region. Numeric and alpha codes used to identify FS projects are determined by the Forest Service. The original film type for most of this imagery is a natural color negative. Line indexes are available for most projects. The number of index sheets required to cover a project area is shown on the listing. Please reference the remarks column, which may identify a larger or smaller project area than the National Forest area defined in the header. Offered in the catalog listing at each National Forest heading is a link to locate the Regional and National Forest office address and phone number at: http://www.fs.fed.us/intro/directory You may wish to visit the National Forest office to view the current imagery and have them assist you in identifying aerial imagery from the APFO.