Energy Efficiency in Buildings; Sonora State, Mexico

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Energy Efficiency in Buildings; Sonora State, Mexico AUGUST 2019 ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN BUILDINGS Sonora State, Mexico Photo by Brianda Maldonado on Unsplash STATUS AND TRENDS México, 2017b). Natural gas is another popular energy source in Sonora, as 278.4 million standard cubic feet per The Estado Libre y Soberano de Sonora (Sonora State, day (MMSCFD) were consumed in 2016 only (ibid.). hereafter) is one of the 32 federal entities of Mexico. Located in the north-west of the country, Sonora borders In 2016, Sonora accounted for 4.4% of Mexico’s national with other Mexican states of Baja California, Chihuahua, electricity generation with the local installed electricity and Sinaloa, as well as with the United States. It is generation capacity being at the level of 3,140 MW. As per composed of 72 municipalities, whose capital and the Figure 1, clean energy sources have only a small share (ca. largest city is Hermosillo. The main climate is classified as 5%) in the local electricity mix (ibid.). dry desert, according to the Köppen climate classification. The population of Sonora is 2.58 million inhabitants, with 86% of them living in urban areas and 14% – in rural ones. Figure 1. Distribution of sources for electricity in Sonora has a surface of 184,934 km2 and is the second Sonora 5.2% 0.2% largest1,200 state of Mexico, as it represents 9.2% of the whole 1.3% Mexican territory (Gobierno de México, 2019). 1.7% 1,000 The state has a notable abundance of mineral resources and the local economy accounted for 3.5% of Mexico’s 800 national GDP in 2016, with manufacturing activities accounting for the largest share. Overall, the main economic 600 sectors are represented by mining, quarrying, oil and gas 36.7% 55% extraction, manufacturing, wholesale and retail trade, and real400 estate (Pro México, 2017a). The state received USD 253 million in Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in 2017, principally for the manufacturing industries (ibid.). 200 Sonora is considered as one of the largest consumers of 0 oil products2008 in2009 Mexico.2010 The local2011 demand2012 for oil2013 shows2014 that petroleum coke was the most demanded oil product, Combined Thermal Internal especially for the industrial sector. In fact, in 2016 the cycle power plant combustion demand for petroleum cokeElectricity was 290.4 consumption tonnes and the(in Gwh) Gas-turbine Hydro Solar and wind demand of other oil productsSubscribers was 56.8 (inMbbl/d. thousands) The local Source: Pro México (2017a) demand, however, has been diminishing since 2011 (Pro 1 16.3% 19.9% 2.7% 61.1% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Building sector Agriculture sector Residential sector Business SMEs Transport sector Industrial sector Public sector Pumping 1000 800 600 400 200 0 2011 20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010 20122013201420152016 5.2% 0.2% 1,200 1.3% 1.7% 1,000 800 600 36.7% 55% 400 200 0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Combined Thermal Internal cycle power plant combustion Electricity consumption (in Gwh) Gas-turbine Hydro Solar and wind Subscribers (in thousands) 5.2% 0.2% 1,200 1.3% 1.7% 1,000 5.2% 0.2% 1,200 1.3% 800 1.7% Figure1,000 2. Percentage of energy consumption by The latest energy report (Balance de Energía del Estado de sector600 in Sonora in 2010 Sonora) dates back to 2010 and presents the data on local 36.7% 55% 800 energy consumption, energy sources, and distribution of energy demand amongst sectors. Due to the absence of 400 16.3% more recent statistics, the data from that report is used in 600 this paper despite being36.7% outdated, in order to 55%show the 19.9%200 2.7% building sector is the third most energy-consuming sector, 400 after transport and industry (Figure 2) (Gobierno del Estado 0 de Sonora; Comisión de Energía del Estado de Sonora, 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 61.1% 200 2011). Combined Thermal Internal cycle power plant combustion Electricity consumption (in Gwh) As for electricity consumption, Small and Medium 0 Gas-turbine Hydro Solar and wind Enterprises (SMEs) followed by the residential sector have 2008 2009 2010Subscribers2011 (in2012 thousands)2013 2014 the largest sharesCombined in the State ofThermal Sonora. In fact, theInternal data cycle power plant combustion from 2015 show that these two sub-sectors combined cover Electricity consumption (in Gwh) more than theGas-turbine 80% of the local Hydroelectricity demandSolar (Figure and 3) wind 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Subscribers (in thousands) (Pro México, 2017b). Building sector Agriculture sector Residential sector Business SMEs Transport sector Industrial sector In 2016, the electricity consumption of residential units Public sector Pumping was 4488 kWh. The fact that residential buildings account Source: Gobierno del Estado de Sonora; Comisión de Energía for more than one third of electricity demand in the State del Estado de Sonora (2011) (Figure 3) and the residential floor area has been growing rapidly (Figure 4), indicates that without energy efficiency measures residential sector will continue to contribute 1000 Figure 3. Electricity demand by sector in Sonora significantly to increasing demand for for fossil fuels, State in 2015 which already represent more than 90% of the electricity 800 16.3% generation (Figure 1). Targeting energy efficiency for residential sub-sector is a crucial measure to mitigate local 600 fossil fuels consumption19.9% (CONUEE, 2019). 2.7% 16.3% 400 The uptake of green or energy efficient buildings in Sonora 200 is limited. For example,61.1%19.9% there are two buildings registered 2.7% under the LEED certification, namely the Willis Towers 0 Watson and the TE Tangerine in Hermosillo. Another one, the BD Medical Nogales building, achieved the 2011 61.1% 20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010 20122013201420152016 Energy Star Challenge for Industry in 2012. In addition, in 2015, two commercial buildings received a gold and a silver certification from TripAdvisor GreenLeaders (The 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Green Building Information Gateway, 2019). Therefore, development of green buildingsBuilding in Sonora sector has started,Agriculture sector Residential sector Business SMEs though at a very small scaleTransport and only insector the capitalIndustrial city. sector Public sector Pumping 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Source: Pro México (2017b) Building sector Agriculture sector Residential sector Business SMEs INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORKTransport sector Industrial sector Public sector Pumping As Mexico is a federal country, the State of Sonora enjoys 1000Figure 4. Number of residential buildings in Sonora (from 2000 to 2016) its own constitution, congress, and judiciary, similarly to other States of Mexico. With regards to the local institutions 800 working on energy efficiency for the building sector, the 1000 following are the most relevant ones in Sonora State: 600 – The Comisión de Energía del Estado de Sonora (Energy 800 400 Commission of the State of Sonora) is the principal institution working on energy efficiency in Sonora 600 200 established in 2009. Their goal is to research, innovate, and develop sustainable energy systems, as well as to 400 0 foster energy efficiency improvements (Gobierno del Estado de Sonora, 2019). 2011 20020002001200220032004200520062007200820092010 20122013201420152016 – The Energy Commission is part of the Foro Consultivo CENAGAS región Noroeste (CENAGAS Consultative 0 Forum for the Northwest region), which works on 2011 identifying the actual and potential demand of natural 20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010 20122013201420152016 gas. CENAGAS is composed of authorities from Sonora, Source: CONUEE (2019) Baja California, Baja California Sur, Chihuahua, 2 Durango, and Sinaloa (Centro Nacional de Control del to support development of energy efficiency projects, to Gas Natural, 2019). Through this Forum, Mexican states create a regulatory and coordination authority on energy can present to the national institutions data on their efficiency, and to incorporate smart and energy efficient local energy demand and supply, as well as to identify solutions into existing projects (e.g. installation of smart opportunities and challenges for distribution of natural metres and intelligent energy management data systems, gas at the national level. improvement of building insulation, etc.). It also promotes – The Comisión Sonora – Arizona (Commission Sonora good practices and the research into the Water-Energy- – Arizona) and the Arizona – Sonora Commission are Food Nexus (Pro México, 2017b). two public institutions, which were established in 1959 with the objective of fostering collaboration between In line with the goals for the Commission Sonora – Arizona, the two regions and within the megaregion of Sonora a roadmap for energy development of the megaregion (Mexico) and Arizona (the United States). Amongst 14 Sonora – Arizona was published in 2017. It focuses on committees, which constitute the Commission Sonora education and training on energy efficiency practices, – Arizona, the most relevant ones in relation to energy regulatory frameworks, and energy demand as means efficiency are the following: agriculture and wild life; to increase energy savings (Comisión Arizona-México, economic development; ecology, environment and Comisión Sonora-Arizona, 2017).This roadmap, however, water; energy. The goal of these organisations is to foster lacks the formulation of specific actions, as well as a the relations between the two regions, with a particular timeline for implementation. focus on sustainability issues (Gobierno del Estado de Sonora, 2017). – Other institutional actors in Sonora working on energy INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT efficiency in the building sector include the Secretaria de Economy (Secretary of Economy) and the Secretaria In the state of Sonora, the municipality of Hermosillo, de Infraestructura y Desarrollo Urbano (Secretary of which is considered to be one of the most active when Urban Infrastructure and Ecology) (INAFED, 2019). In it comes to design and implementation of projects, the 2016, they signed a memorandum of understanding Tool for Rapid Assessment of City Energy (TRACE) of with the Instituto Tecnológico de Hermosillo (Technical ESMAP’s Energy Efficiency Cities Program was used for Institute of Hermosillo) and the Energy Commission, in data collection in 2014-2015.
Recommended publications
  • Ayuntamiento De Hermosillo - Cities 2019
    Ayuntamiento de Hermosillo - Cities 2019 Introduction (0.1) Please give a general description and introduction to your city including your city’s reporting boundary in the table below. Administrative Description of city boundary City Metropolitan Hermosillo is the capital of the Sonora State in Mexico, and a regional example in the development of farming, animal husbandry and boundary area manufacturing industries. Hermosillo is advantaged with extraordinarily extensive municipal boundaries; its metropolitan area has an extension of 1,273 km² and 727,267 inhabitants (INEGI, 2010). Located on coordinates 29°05’56”N 110°57’15”W, Hermosillo’s climate is desert-arid (Köppen-Geiger classification). It has an average rainfall of 328 mm per year and an average annual maximum temperature of 34.0 degrees Celsius. Mexico’s National Atlas of Zones with High Clean Energy Potential, distinguishes Hermosillo as place of high solar energy yield, with a potential of 6,000-6,249 Wh/m²/day. Hermosillo is a strategic place in Mexico’s business network. Situated about 280 kilometers from the United States border (south of Arizona), Hermosillo is a key member of the Arizona-Sonora mega region and a link of the CANAMEX corridor which connects Canada, Mexico and the United States. The city is among the “top 5 best cities to live in Mexico”, as declared by the Strategic Communication Office (IMCO, 2018). Hermosillo’s cultural heritage, cleanliness, low cost of living, recreational amenities and skilled workforce are core characteristics that make it a stunning place to live and work. In terms of governance, Hermosillo’s status as the capital of Sonora gives it a lot of institutional and political advantages, particularly in terms of access to investment programs and resources, as well as power structures that matter in urban decision-making.
    [Show full text]
  • A Distributional Survey of the Birds of Sonora, Mexico
    52 A. J. van Rossem Occ. Papers Order FALCONIFORMES Birds of PreY Family Cathartidae American Vultures Coragyps atratus (Bechstein) Black Vulture Vultur atratus Bechstein, in Latham, Allgem. Ueb., Vögel, 1, 1793, Anh., 655 (Florida). Coragyps atratus atratus van Rossem, 1931c, 242 (Guaymas; Saric; Pesqueira: Obregon; Tesia); 1934d, 428 (Oposura). — Bent, 1937, 43, in text (Guaymas: Tonichi). — Abbott, 1941, 417 (Guaymas). — Huey, 1942, 363 (boundary at Quito­ vaquita) . Cathartista atrata Belding, 1883, 344 (Guaymas). — Salvin and Godman, 1901. 133 (Guaymas). Common, locally abundant, resident of Lower Sonoran and Tropical zones almost throughout the State, except that there are no records as yet from the deserts west of longitude 113°, nor from any of the islands. Concentration is most likely to occur in the vicinity of towns and ranches. A rather rapid extension of range to the northward seems to have taken place within a relatively few years for the species was not noted by earlier observers anywhere north of the limits of the Tropical zone (Guaymas and Oposura). It is now common nearly everywhere, a few modern records being Nogales and Rancho La Arizona southward to Agiabampo, with distribution almost continuous and with numbers rapidly increasing southerly, May and June, 1937 (van Rossem notes); Pilares, in the north­ east, June 23, 1935 (Univ. Mich.); Altar, in the northwest, February 2, 1932 (Phillips notes); Magdalena, May, 1925 (Dawson notes; [not noted in that locality by Evermann and Jenkins in July, 1887]). The highest altitudes where observed to date are Rancho La Arizona, 3200 feet; Nogales, 3850 feet; Rancho Santa Bárbara, 5000 feet, the last at the lower fringe of the Transition zone.
    [Show full text]
  • I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Sonora, Mexico Municipal Development Project
    I fJl-~-5r3 I 5 5 I 9 7 7 I SONORA, MEXICO I MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT: DIAGNOSTIC ASSESSMENT OF I THE CITY OF AGUA PRIETA I September 1996 I I Prepared for I U.S. Agency for International Development I By Frank B. Ohnesorgen I Ramon R. Osuna I Julio Zapata I I INTERNATIONAL CITY/COUNTY MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION Municipal Development and Management USAID Contract No. PCE-I008-Q-00-5002-00 -I USAID Project No. 940-1008 Delivery Order No.5 I I I I I TABLE OF CONTENTS I 1 INTRODUCTION 1 I 2 METHODOLOGY 2 I 3 GENERAL MUNICIPAL CHARACTERISTICS 2 4 DIAGNOSTIC ASSESSMENT AND OBSERVATIONS 2 I 4.1 Office ofthe Mayor (Presidente Municipal) and Councilmembers (Regidores) 2 4.2 The Office ofthe Municipal Secretary (Secretario Municipal) 3 4.3 The Office ofSolidarity Programs (Director de Programas de Solideridad) 4 I 4.4 The Office ofHuman Resources (Personnel) (Director de Recursos Humanos) 4 4.5 The Office ofMunicipal Controller (Contraloria Municipal) 5 4.6 The Office ofPublic Works (Directora de Obras Pilblicas) 6 I 4.7 The Office ofIntegral Family Development (Desarrollo Integral de Familias) 6 4.8 The Office ofPublic Services (Director de Servicios Pilblicos) 7 4.9 The Office ofMunicipal Treasurer (Tesorero Municipal) 7 I 4.10 The Office ofProcurator (Sindico Procurador) 8 I 5 GENERAL DIAGNOSTIC OBSERVATIONS 9 6 RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL 10 I I I I I I I I I I I -111- ABSTRACT I The Sonora, Mexico Municipal Development Project (SMMD) was initiated in response to the local government demand for autonomy in Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Proposal
    Board Document BD 2007-XX August 29, 2007 Border Environment Cooperation Commission Wastewater Collection Project in Agua Prieta, Sonora. 1. General Criteria 1.a Project Type The project consists of improving and expanding the wastewater collection system for the community of Agua Prieta, in the municipality of Agua Prieta, Sonora. This project belongs to BECC's Wastewater Treatment and Domestic Water and Wastewater Hookups Sectors. 1.b Project Categories The project belongs to the category of Community Environmental Infrastructure Projects – Community-wide Impact. The project will improve wastewater collection quality service in the community of Agua Prieta resulting in a positive impact to this community. 1.c Project Location and Community Profile The State of Sonora is located in the northeastern part of the Republic of Mexico, adjacent to the United States of America. Agua Prieta, Sonora is located in the northeastern part of the State of Sonora and neighbors the City of Douglas, Arizona, USA. About 47% of the population in Agua Prieta is employed in maquilas, commerce or by rendering services. The rest of the population is employed in agricultural related activities. The following figure shows the geographic location of Agua Prieta. 1 Board Document BD 2007-XX BECC Certification Document Agua Prieta, Sonora Demographics Population projections prepared during the development of the Final Design of the Wastewater Collection System1 for Agua Prieta, Sonora were based on census data obtained by the National Institute for Statistics, Geography, and Information (INEGI 2000 for its initial in Spanish) and the National Population Council (CONAPO for its initial in Spanish). The current population (2007) has been estimated to be 70,523 inhabitants and estimations for the year 2027 forecast were 79,143 inhabitants.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Consultation Trans-Border Exposure to Smoke from Refuse
    Health Consultation Trans-border Exposure to Smoke From a Refuse Fire in Naco, Sonora, Mexico December 1 to December 5, 2001 Naco, Arizona, USA, and Naco, Sonora, Mexico Prepared by Arizona Department of Health Services Office of Environmental Health Environmental Health Consultation Services under cooperative agreement with the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry March 2002 Introduction A refuse dump near Naco, Sonora, Mexico, caught fire and burned from December 1 to December 5, 2001. The fire, which consumed large quantities of household refuse, also generated a large quantity of smoke. During this period, considerable smoke was intermittently present in Naco, Arizona. Persons up to 17 miles away from the fire reported smelling the smoke. At night in the Naco area, smoke concentrations were generally higher when weather conditions caused smoke to settle in residential neighborhoods on both sides of the border. The Arizona Department of Health Services and the Cochise County Health Department issued public health advisories for the evenings of December 1 and 2, 2001. The Naco, Arizona, Port of Entry closed during periods of heavy smoke to protect the health and safety of employees and travelers. The Cochise County Board of Supervisors declared a state of emergency to gain access to state and federal resources. This report summarizes the events that occurred during the fire and analyzes the data collected by the Arizona Department of Health Services and the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality to determine the extent of the public health threat from the fire. Background Saturday, December 1, 2001 The Cochise County Health Department received calls from citizens complaining about the smoke.
    [Show full text]
  • Sonora, Mexico
    Higher Education in Regional and City Development Higher Education in Regional and City Higher Education in Regional and City Development Development SONORA, MEXICO, Sonora is one of the wealthiest states in Mexico and has made great strides in Sonora, building its human capital and skills. How can Sonora turn the potential of its universities and technological institutions into an active asset for economic and Mexico social development? How can it improve the equity, quality and relevance of education at all levels? Jaana Puukka, Susan Christopherson, This publication explores a range of helpful policy measures and institutional Patrick Dubarle, Jocelyne Gacel-Ávila, reforms to mobilise higher education for regional development. It is part of the series Vera Pavlakovich-Kochi of the OECD reviews of Higher Education in Regional and City Development. These reviews help mobilise higher education institutions for economic, social and cultural development of cities and regions. They analyse how the higher education system impacts upon regional and local development and bring together universities, other higher education institutions and public and private agencies to identify strategic goals and to work towards them. Sonora, Mexico CONTENTS Chapter 1. Human capital development, labour market and skills Chapter 2. Research, development and innovation Chapter 3. Social, cultural and environmental development Chapter 4. Globalisation and internationalisation Chapter 5. Capacity building for regional development ISBN 978- 92-64-19333-8 89 2013 01 1E1 Higher Education in Regional and City Development: Sonora, Mexico 2013 This work is published on the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Organisation or of the governments of its member countries.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Nogales General Plan
    City of Nogales General Plan Background and Current Conditions Volume City of Nogales General Plan Background and Current Conditions Volume City of Nogales General Plan Parks Open Sports Space Industry History Culture Prepared for: Prepared by: City of Nogales The Planning Center 1450 North Hohokam Drive 2 East Congress, Suite 600 Nogales, Arizona Tucson, Arizona Background and Current Conditions Volume City of Nogales General Plan Update Table of Contents Table of Contents i Acknowledgements ii Introduction and Overview 1 History and Background 12 Economic Development Framework 20 Background Analysis and Inventory 35 Nogales Demographics Profile 69 Housing and Household Characteristics 71 Parks, Recreation, Trails and OpenSpace 78 Technical Report Conclusions 84 Bibliography and References 86 Exhibits Exhibit 1: International and Regional Context 7 Exhibit 2: Local Context 8 Exhibit 3: Nogales Designated Growth Area 9 Exhibit 4: History of Annexation 19 Exhibit 5: Physical Setting 39 Exhibit 6: Existing Rivers and Washes 40 Exhibit 7: Topography 41 Exhibit 8: Vegetative Communities 42 Exhibit 9: Functionally Classified Roads 54 Exhibit 10: School Districts and Schools 62 Background and Current Conditions Volume Table of Contents Page i City of Nogales General Plan City of Nogales Department Directors Alejandro Barcenas, Public Works Director Danitza Lopez, Library Director Micah Gaudet, Housing Director Jeffery Sargent, Fire Chief Juan Guerra, City Engineer John E. Kissinger, Deputy City Manager Leticia Robinson, City Clerk Marcel Bachelier
    [Show full text]
  • Sonora Imuris IMURIS 1105123 304641 Sonora Imuris EL
    ENTIDAD MUNICIPIO LOCALIDAD LONG LAT Sonora Imuris IMURIS 1105123 304641 Sonora Imuris EL ALAMILLO 1104042 303908 Sonora Imuris EL ÁLAMO 1104939 304701 Sonora Imuris ARIBABI 1103907 305158 Sonora Imuris LA ATASCOSA 1105221 305853 Sonora Imuris BABASAC 1104721 304727 Sonora Imuris LA BELLOTA 1103554 305549 Sonora Imuris CAMPO CARRETERO 1105111 304617 Sonora Imuris LA CANTINA 1104736 304757 Sonora Imuris LA CASITA 1105304 310005 Sonora Imuris CERRO BLANCO 1105020 304927 Sonora Imuris EL COYOTE (LA QUIRUGUEÑA) 1104840 304718 Sonora Imuris LAS CRUCES 1104901 304705 Sonora Imuris LA ESTACIÓN 1105220 304638 Sonora Imuris EL FRESNAL 1105243 304840 Sonora Imuris LOS JANOS 1105003 305014 Sonora Imuris LA LAGUNA 1104901 304639 Sonora Imuris LA MESA 1105433 304443 Sonora Imuris PUERTA DEL CAJÓN 1104559 304826 Sonora Imuris EL SALTO 1104655 304733 Sonora Imuris TERRENATE 1105518 304340 Sonora Imuris LAS VIGUITAS 1105048 304845 Sonora Imuris EL POZO 1110052 305829 Sonora Imuris LA VÍBORA 1105843 305554 Sonora Imuris EL CRUCERO 1105220 304623 Sonora Imuris LA CASA DE PIEDRA 1104810 304738 Sonora Imuris LOS VALLECITOS 1105521 305238 Sonora Imuris EL CAMPITO (LA NOPALERA) 1105054 305306 Sonora Imuris LAS PLAYITAS 1105158 305500 Sonora Imuris EL QUELITAL 1105201 305402 Sonora Imuris LA CHICOLITA 1105050 304819 Sonora Imuris YERBABUENA 1105325 304557 Sonora Imuris ESTACIÓN CUMERAL 1105105 305314 Sonora Imuris LA QUINTA 1104654 304808 Sonora Imuris CAÑADA DEL DIABLO 1105037 304621 Sonora Imuris EL RANCHITO 1105307 304604 Sonora Imuris LAS FLORES 1105101
    [Show full text]
  • Connecting Mountain Islands and Desert Seas
    The Forgotten Flora of la Frontera Thomas R. Van Devender and Ana Lilia Reina Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum, Tucson, AZ Abstract—About 1,500 collections from within 100 kilometers of the Arizona border in Sonora yielded noteworthy records for 164 plants including 44 new species (12 non-native) for Sonora and 12 (six non-native) for Mexico, conservation species, and regional endemics. Many com- mon widespread species were poorly collected. Southern range extensions (120 species) were more numerous than northern extensions (20), although nine potentially occur in Arizona. Non-native species dispersed along highways and escaped from cultivation. The Turkish poppy (Glaucium corniculatum), established near Agua Prieta, may reach Arizona. African buffelgrass (Pennisetum ciliare) and Natal grass (Melinis repens) are rapidly expanding into new, higher elevation areas. Beginning with Howard Gentry, Forrest Shreve, and Ira Introduction Wiggins in the 1930s, botanists from the United States rushed In northeastern Sonora, grassland and Chihuahuan southward to the tantalizing tropical deciduous forests of the desertscrub extend across the border from Arizona and Río Mayo region of southeastern Sonora, the treasures of the New Mexico. Isolated “sky island” mountains support oak Sierra Madre Occidental in eastern Sonora (Gentry 1942; woodlands and pine-oak forests in the Apachean Highlands Martin et al. 1998), or the scenic Sonoran Desert (Shreve and Ecoregion, the northwestern Madrean Archipelago extend- Wiggins 1964). Botanists from Mexico City 2,200 km to the ing northeast of the “mainland” Sierra Madre Occidental. southeast only occasionally visited Sonora. Solis G. (1993) and Finger-like northern extensions of foothills thornscrub lie in Fishbein et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Binational Prevention and Emergency Response Plan Between Cochise County, Arizona and Naco, Sonora
    Binational Prevention and Emergency Response Plan Between Cochise County, Arizona and Naco, Sonora BINATIONAL PREVENTION AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN BETWEEN NACO, SONORA AND COCHISE COUNTY, ARIZONA October 4, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .............................................................................................................. v FORWARD................................................................................................................................... vii MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING................................................................................. 1 EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION FORM ...................................................................................... 7 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 9 1.1 Naco, Sonora/Cochise County, Arizona Plan Area ...............................................10 1.1.1 Physical Environment ................................................................................10 1.1.2 Population ..................................................................................................11 1.1.3 Economy ....................................................................................................12 1.1.4 Infrastructure..............................................................................................12 1.1.5 Cultural Significance .................................................................................13 1.2 Authority................................................................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Mexico 2019 Crime & Safety Report: Nogales
    Mexico 2019 Crime & Safety Report: Nogales This is an annual report produced in conjunction with the Regional Security Office at the U.S. Consulate General in Nogales, Mexico. The current U.S. Department of State Travel Advisory at the date of this report’s publication assesses Mexico at Level 2, indicating travelers should exercise increased caution due to crime. Reconsider travel to the State of Sonora due to crime. Overall Crime and Safety Situation The U.S. Consulate General in Nogales does not assume responsibility for the professional ability or integrity of the persons or firms appearing in this report. The American Citizens’ Services unit (ACS) cannot recommend a particular individual or location, and assumes no responsibility for the quality of service provided. Review OSAC’s Mexico-specific webpage for original OSAC reporting, consular messages, and contact information, some of which may be available only to private-sector representatives with an OSAC password. The Nogales consular district is the northern part of the state of Sonora, extending 600 miles from Agua Prieta in eastern Sonora, to San Luis Rio Colorado in western Sonora, and about 60 miles south of the U.S.-Mexico border. Crime Threats There is serious risk from crime in Nogales. Although in 2018, the overall level of crime in Sonora increased, crime levels in all but one category in northern Sonora decreased. Drug cartel-related (narco-related) violence continues to dominate as the motive behind many of the homicides and violent crimes in the Nogales district. The majority of cartel-related violence has occurred in other cities, such as Caborca, Magdalena, Altar, and Sonoyta.
    [Show full text]
  • Border Stories: a New Perspective on Mexican Immigration Naco, Sonora
    Border Stories: A New Perspective on Mexican Immigration 1 Naco, Sonora, Mexico Union College Jared Iacolucci, USA, Union College Kaitlyn Evans, USA, Union College Erin Schumaker, USA, Union College Section I: This project aimed to provide basic humanitarian aid to migrants, who while crossing the U.S.-Mexico border, were apprehended and detained by the U.S. Border Patrol at the Naco, Arizona station. To supplement this aid, we planned to document stories and abuses suffered by the migrants during apprehension and detention and write a book to inform the public of the reality of the deportation process. The first unanticipated problem we faced was the living arrangements. Originally we had all planned to stay in the migrant shelter, but the director of the program requested that two group members take care of her house for two weeks while she was away. This was a problem because we expected to spend each day and night in the shelter in order to speak more with the migrants and collect more stories. Secondly, the Migrant Resource Center is located in Naco, Sonora, a small town that survives on human trafficking. Therefore, we encountered unexpected competition in the form of Coyotes (human traffickers) that intimidated migrants and occasionally volunteers at the center. Their presence made it difficult to convince migrants that we were there only to help, and not associated with human trafficking or other crime. Lastly, beginning in late August, the governments of both the United States and Mexico agreed to begin a six-week program of voluntary repatriation by airplane. Instead of returning migrants through the various ports of entry along the border, migrants are flown to Mexico City where they are processed and sent to their states.
    [Show full text]