Africa's Active Militant Islamist Groups

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Africa's Active Militant Islamist Groups AFRICA’S ACTIVE MILITANT ISLAMIST GROUPS LIBYA TUNISIA • Islamic State in Libya (f.k.a. Wilayat Barqa, Wilayat Fezzan, and Wilayat Tarabulus) • Okba ibn Nafaa Brigade Morocco • Ansar al Sharia Tunisia (AST) • Soldiers of the Caliphate (a.k.a. Jund al Khilafah) (targeting both Algeria and Tunisia) EGYPT • Islamic State in Sinai (a.k.a. Wilayat Sinai) (f.k.a. Ansar Beit al Maqdis (ABM)) ALGERIA • Islamic State in Egypt • Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) (operating across North Mauritania Africa) Niger Chad Eritrea Sudan MALI/BURKINA FASO/NIGER • Jama'at Nusrat al Islam wal Muslimin SOMALIA (JNIM), ocially comprising the • Al Shabaab following regional AQIM aliates: Côte d’ South Ethiopia • Islamic State in - Ansar Dine Ivoire Ghana Central African Sudan Somalia (ISS) (a.k.a. Republic - Macina Liberation Front (FLM) Cameroon Abnaa ul Calipha) - Al Mourabitoun - Sahara Emirate of AQIM NIGERIA/NIGER/ Uganda • Ansaroul Islam CAMEROON/CHAD • Islamic State in the Greater Sahara • Boko Haram (a.k.a. Jama'atu Ahlis (ISGS) Sunna Lidda'Awati Wal Jihad) KENYA/TANZANIA • Islamic State in West Africa (ISWA) DEM. REP. OF THE • Al Hijra (f.k.a. Muslim Youth Center) (a.k.a. Wilayat Gharb Afriqiyah) CONGO Tanzania • Al Muhajiroun in East Africa • Ansaru (a.k.a. Jama’atu Ansarul • Madina Tawheed wal Muslimina Fi Biladis Sudan) Muwahedeen (MTM) ATTACKS TRENDS IN MILITANT ISLAMIST GROUP ACTIVITY IN AFRICA Malawi AQIM and aliates Al Qaeda aliates 5,000 MOZAMBIQUE Al Shabaab and aliates 4,500 • Ahlu Sunnah wa Jama’a 4,000 (ASWJ) (a.k.a. "al Zimbabwe ASWJ and aliates 3,500 Shabaab") Boko Haram and aliates 3,000 ISIS aliates 2,500 Events 2,000 ISWA and aliates 1,500 ISGS and aliates 1,000 ISS and aliates 500 Unidentied/unaliated groups 0 South 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Africa “a.k.a.” = also known as AQIM ISGS BH ISWA Al Shabaab ISS AQ ISIS ASWJ Unaliated “f.k.a.” = formerly known as Updated: February 2021 Note: Compiled by the Africa Center for Strategic Studies, this graphic shows violent events involving the listed groups over the 12-month period ending December 31, 2020. Data on attacks or fatalities does not attempt to distinguish the perpetrators of the events. Group listings are intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered ocial designations. Due to the uid nature of many groups, the listed aliations may change. Sources: Armed Conict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED); Daniel Byman; HumAngle; Thomas Joscelyn; SITE Intelligence Group; The Soufan Group; Stanford University’s Mapping Militants Project; Stratfor; Terrorism Research & Analysis Consortium (TRAC); and Aaron Y. Zelin..
Recommended publications
  • Country Reports on Terrorism 2016
    Country Reports on Terrorism 2016 July 2017 ________________________________ United States Department of State Publication Bureau of Counterterrorism Released July 2017 Country Reports on Terrorism 2016 is submitted in compliance with Title 22 of the United States Code, Section 2656f (the “Act”), which requires the Department of State to provide to Congress a full and complete annual report on terrorism for those countries and groups meeting the criteria of the Act. COUNTRY REPORTS ON TERRORISM 2016 Table of Contents Chapter 1. Strategic Assessment Chapter 2. Country Reports Africa Overview Trans-Sahara Counterterrorism Partnership Partnership for Regional East Africa Counterterrorism Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Chad Djibouti Eritrea Ethiopia Kenya Mali Mauritania Niger Nigeria Senegal Somalia South Africa Tanzania Uganda East Asia and the Pacific Overview Australia China (Hong Kong and Macau) Indonesia Democratic People’s Republic of Korea Malaysia Philippines Singapore Thailand Europe Overview Albania Austria Azerbaijan Belgium Bosnia and Herzegovina Bulgaria Cyprus Denmark France Georgia Germany Greece Ireland Italy Kosovo Macedonia The Netherlands Norway Russia Serbia Spain Sweden Turkey United Kingdom Middle East and North Africa Overview Algeria Bahrain Egypt Iraq Israel, the West Bank, Gaza, and Jerusalem Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Libya Morocco Oman Qatar Saudi Arabia Tunisia United Arab Emirates Yemen South and Central Asia Overview Afghanistan Bangladesh India Kazakhstan Kyrgyz Republic Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka Tajikistan
    [Show full text]
  • Jihadism in Africa Local Causes, Regional Expansion, International Alliances
    SWP Research Paper Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs Guido Steinberg and Annette Weber (Eds.) Jihadism in Africa Local Causes, Regional Expansion, International Alliances RP 5 June 2015 Berlin All rights reserved. © Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, 2015 SWP Research Papers are peer reviewed by senior researchers and the execu- tive board of the Institute. They express exclusively the personal views of the authors. SWP Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs Ludwigkirchplatz 3­4 10719 Berlin Germany Phone +49 30 880 07-0 Fax +49 30 880 07-100 www.swp-berlin.org [email protected] ISSN 1863-1053 Translation by Meredith Dale (Updated English version of SWP-Studie 7/2015) Table of Contents 5 Problems and Recommendations 7 Jihadism in Africa: An Introduction Guido Steinberg and Annette Weber 13 Al-Shabaab: Youth without God Annette Weber 31 Libya: A Jihadist Growth Market Wolfram Lacher 51 Going “Glocal”: Jihadism in Algeria and Tunisia Isabelle Werenfels 69 Spreading Local Roots: AQIM and Its Offshoots in the Sahara Wolfram Lacher and Guido Steinberg 85 Boko Haram: Threat to Nigeria and Its Northern Neighbours Moritz Hütte, Guido Steinberg and Annette Weber 99 Conclusions and Recommendations Guido Steinberg and Annette Weber 103 Appendix 103 Abbreviations 104 The Authors Problems and Recommendations Jihadism in Africa: Local Causes, Regional Expansion, International Alliances The transnational terrorism of the twenty-first century feeds on local and regional conflicts, without which most terrorist groups would never have appeared in the first place. That is the case in Afghanistan and Pakistan, Syria and Iraq, as well as in North and West Africa and the Horn of Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Extremism Monitor
    Global Extremism Monitor Violent Islamist Extremism in 2017 WITH A FOREWORD BY TONY BLAIR SEPTEMBER 2018 1 2 Contents Foreword 7 Executive Summary 9 Key Findings About the Global Extremism Monitor The Way Forward Introduction 13 A Unifying Ideology Global Extremism Today The Long War Against Extremism A Plethora of Insurgencies Before 9/11 A Proliferation of Terrorism Since 9/11 The Scale of the Problem The Ten Deadliest Countries 23 Syria Iraq Afghanistan Somalia Nigeria Yemen Egypt Pakistan Libya Mali Civilians as Intended Targets 45 Extremist Groups and the Public Space Prominent Victims Breakdown of Public Targets Suicide Bombings 59 Use of Suicide Attacks by Group Female Suicide Bombers Executions 71 Deadliest Groups Accusations Appendices 83 Methodology Glossary About Us Notes 3 Countries Affected by Violent Islamist Extremism, 2017 4 5 6 Foreword Tony Blair One of the core objectives of the Institute is the promotion of co-existence across the boundaries of religious faith and the combating of extremism based on an abuse of faith. Part of this work is research into the phenomenon of extremism derived particularly from the abuse of Islam. This publication is the most comprehensive analysis of such extremism to date and utilises data on terrorism in a new way to show: 1. Violent extremism connected with the perversion of Islam today is global, affecting over 60 countries. 2. Now more than 120 different groups worldwide are actively engaged in this violence. 3. These groups are united by an ideology that shares certain traits and beliefs. 4. The ideology and the violence associated with it have been growing over a period of decades stretching back to the 1980s or further, closely correlated with the development of the Muslim Brotherhood into a global movement, the Iranian Revolution in 1979 and—in the same year—the storming by extremist insurgents of Islam’s holy city of Mecca.
    [Show full text]
  • Somalia's Al-Shabaab and the Global Jihad Network
    Terrorism without Borders: Somalia’s Al-Shabaab and the global jihad network by Daniel E. Agbiboa This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Abstract This article sets out to explore the evolution, operational strategy and transnational dimensions of Harakat Al-Shabab al-Mujahedeen (aka Al-Shabab), the Somali-based Islamist terrorist group. The article argues that Al-Shabab’s latest Westgate attack in Kenya should be understood in the light of the group’s deepening ties with Al-Qaeda and its global jihad, especially since 2009 when Al-Shabab formally pledged allegiance to Osama bin Laden’s Al-Qaeda and welcomed the organisation’s core members into its leadership. Key words: Al-Shabab, Westgate Attack; Al-Qaeda; Global Jihad; Kenya; Somalia. Introduction n 21 September 2013, the world watched with horror as a group of Islamist gunmen stormed Kenya’s high-end Westgate Mall in Nairobi and fired at weekend shoppers, killing over 80 people. The gunmen reportedly shouted in Swahili that Muslims would be allowed to leave while all others Owere subjected to their bloodletting (Agbiboa, 2013a). Countries like France, Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand, and Ghana, among others, all confirmed that their citizens were among those affected. The renowned Ghanaian Poet, Kofi Awoonor, was also confirmed dead in the attack (Mamdani, 2013). The Somali-based and Al-Qaeda-affiliated Islamist terrorist group, Harakat Al-Shabab al-Mujahideen or, more commonly, Al-Shabab – “the youth” in Arabic – have since claimed responsibility for the horrific attack through its Twitter account.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Media in Africa
    Social media in Africa A double-edged sword for security and development Technical annex Kate Cox, William Marcellino, Jacopo Bellasio, Antonia Ward, Katerina Galai, Sofia Meranto, Giacomo Persi Paoli Table of contents Table of contents ...................................................................................................................................... iii List of figures ........................................................................................................................................... iv List of tables .............................................................................................................................................. v Abbreviations .......................................................................................................................................... vii Annex A: Overview of Technical Annex .................................................................................................... 1 Annex B: Background to al-Shabaab, Boko Haram and ISIL ..................................................................... 3 Annex C: Timeline of significant dates ...................................................................................................... 9 Annex D: Country profiles ...................................................................................................................... 25 Annex E: Social media and communications platforms ............................................................................ 31 Annex F: Twitter data
    [Show full text]
  • Boko Haram and Ansaru - Council on Foreign Relations
    Nigeria's Boko Haram and Ansaru - Council on Foreign Relations http://www.cfr.org/nigeria/boko-haram/p25739 Backgrounders Boko Haram Authors: Mohammed Aly Sergie, and Toni Johnson Updated: October 7, 2014 Introduction Boko Haram, a diffuse Islamist sect, has attacked Nigeria's police and military, politicians, schools, religious buildings, public institutions, and civilians with increasing regularity since 2009. More than five thousand people have been killed in Boko Haram-related violence, and three hundred thousand have been displaced. Some experts view the group as an armed revolt against government corruption, abusive security forces, and widening regional economic disparity. They argue that Abuja should do more to address the strife between the disaffected Muslim north and the Christian south. The U.S. Department of State designated Boko Haram a foreign terrorist organization in 2013. Boko Haram's brutal campaign includes a suicide attack on a United Nations building in Abuja in 2011, repeated attacks that have killed dozens of students, the burning of villages, ties to regional terror groups, and the abduction of more than two hundred girls in April 2014. The Nigerian government hasn't been able to quell the insurgency, and in May 2014 the United States deployed a small group of military advisers to help find the kidnapped girls. The Road to Radicalization Boko Haram was created in 2002 in Maiduguri, the capital of the northeastern state of Borno, by Islamist cleric Mohammed Yusuf. The group aims to establish a fully Islamic state in Nigeria, including the implementation of criminal sharia courts across the country. Paul Lubeck, a University of California, Santa Cruz professor who researches Muslim societies in Africa, says Yusuf was a trained Salafist (an adherent of a school of thought often associated with jihad), and was strongly influenced by Ibn Taymiyyah, a fourteenth-century legal scholar who preached Islamic fundamentalism and is an important figure for radical groups in the Middle East.
    [Show full text]
  • Boko Haram Beyond the Headlines: Analyses of Africa’S Enduring Insurgency
    Boko Haram Beyond the Headlines: Analyses of Africa’s Enduring Insurgency Editor: Jacob Zenn KASSIM BOKO HARAM BEYOND THE HEADLINES MAY 2018 CHAPTER 1: Boko Haram’s Internal Civil War: Stealth Takfir and Jihad as Recipes for Schism By Abdulbasit Kassim The jihadi insurgent movement Boko Haram has established itself as one of the relatively few jihadi movements to succeed in the capture, control, and governance of territory in Africa. Over the course of less than two decades, Boko Haram has morphed from a jihadi movement operating within Nigeria to a movement with a regional presence across multiple countries in West Africa and beyond. Since the internal civil war within the group shot into the news following the war of words between Abubakr Shekau and Muhammad Mamman Nur in August 2016, sundry observers have remained puzzled over how to describe the open competition and outright hostility that fractured the group into two factions. What is the current state of Boko Haram’s internal civil war in northern Nigeria and the Lake Chad region? This is the most frequently asked question by policymakers, scholars, and the general public interested in understanding the trajectory of the decade-old insurgency. The answer to this question has often focused on a stationary analysis of the mutual recrimination between Shekau and Nur in August 2016. Nonetheless, many events are taking place behind the scenes that can only be grasped through a close reading of the constant stream of primary sources produced by the two factions. Abu Mus`ab al-Barnawi’s
    [Show full text]
  • Jama'at Nasr Al-Islam Wal Muslimin (JNIM) Group Profile February 2018
    Jama'at Nasr al-Islam wal Muslimin (JNIM) Group Profile February 2018 1 Security Analysis JNIM Group Profile - February 2017 Background Jama’at Nasr al-Islam wal Muslimin (JNIM), or Group for Support of Islam and Muslims (GSIM) in English, is a militant jihadist organization with presence in the Maghreb and West Africa, which seeks to incite the West African Muslim community to “remove oppression” and expel non-Muslim “occupiers.” Specifically, the group is opposed to France – who has maintained a military presence in Mali since 2012 – and its Western partners, including those involved in UN Iyad Ag Ghaly (center) announcing the establishment of JNIM in March peacekeeping missions. Like its ideological 2017 (Photo: Long War Journal) forefathers in the Salafi-jihadist movement, the group’s goal is to ultimately impose Shariah Law in the entire region. JNIM was officially formed in March 2017 by the merger between three existing jihadist organizations – Ansar Dine, Al-Mourabitoun, and the Sahara branch of Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) – all of them al-Qaeda (AQ) affiliates. The group would later also absorb the Macina Liberation Front (MLF), an Ansar al-Din affiliate in central Mali, reinforcing JNIM’s local credentials and territorial control, as well as making it the largest jihadi group in the Sahara. Since its inception, JNIM has been recognized as the official branch of Al-Qaeda in Mali, with its leaders having sworn allegiance to AQ’s supreme leader, Ayman al-Zawahiri, and the emir of AQIM, Abu Musab Abdul Wadud. It has also been stated by the group’s leadership that through their allegiance to al-Zawahiri, they have also pledged ultimate fealty to the Emir of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan (the Afghan Taliban).
    [Show full text]
  • Boko Haram in the Context of Global Jihadism: a Conceptual Analysis of Violent Extremism in Northern Nigeria and Counter-Terrorism Measures
    BOKO HARAM IN THE CONTEXT OF GLOBAL JIHADISM: A CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS OF VIOLENT EXTREMISM IN NORTHERN NIGERIA AND COUNTER-TERRORISM MEASURES MARK D. KIELSGARD* AND NABIL M. ORINA** ABSTRACT This Article aims to fill a gap in the literature through a conceptual analysis of Boko Haram’s global nature and utilizing that analysis to evaluate current counter-terrorism measures against the group. Central to this analysis will be the question of whether the group can be categorized as a global jihadist group. Global jihadism is understood in this Article as a pan-Islamist movement against Western interests. This Article argues that status as a global jihadist organization and hierarchy within the world’s global jihadist movement are best evaluated on a three-criteria approach using the indicators of conforming ideology, militant operations/targets, and external relations or cooperation. It will be further argued that these criteria are important not only to provide a more comprehensive way of thinking of international terrorism but also in creating * Dr. Mark D. Kielsgard is an Associate Professor of Law at City University of Hong Kong where he serves as the Program Director for the JD program, Associate Director and co-founder of the Centre for Public Law and Human Rights, and is a member of the Centre for Public Affairs and Law (CPAL). His research focuses on criminal law and human rights, and he has published widely on terrorism, genocide, and international criminal law. ** Nabil M. Orina is a Lecturer at Moi University, School of Law, Kenya and a Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the Centre of Excellence for International Courts (iCourts), Faculty of Law, University of Copenhagen.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Reports on Terrorism 2019
    Country Reports on Terrorism 2019 BUREAU OF COUNTERTERRORISM Country Reports on Terrorism 2019 is submitted in compliance with Title 22 of the United States Code, Section 2656f (the “Act”), which requires the Department of State to provide to Congress a full and complete annual report on terrorism for those countries and groups meeting the criteria of the Act. Foreword In 2019, the United States and our partners made major strides to defeat and degrade international terrorist organizations. Along with the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS, in March, the United States completed the destruction of the so-called “caliphate” in Iraq and Syria. In October, the United States launched a military operation that resulted in the death of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the self-proclaimed “caliph” of ISIS. As part of the maximum pressure campaign against the Iranian regime – the world’s worst state sponsor of terrorism – the United States and our partners imposed new sanctions on Tehran and its proxies. In April, the United States designated Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), including its Qods Force, as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) – the first time such a designation has been applied to part of another government. And throughout the year, a number of countries in Western Europe and South America joined the United States in designating Iran-backed Hizballah as a terrorist group in its entirety. Despite these successes, dangerous terrorist threats persisted around the world. Even as ISIS lost its leader and territory, the group adapted to continue the fight from its affiliates across the globe and by inspiring followers to commit attacks.
    [Show full text]
  • The Organization of Terrorist Groups
    University of Nebraska at Omaha DigitalCommons@UNO Student Work 8-1-2020 From Simple to Sophisticated: The Organization of Terrorist Groups Michael K. Logan Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/studentwork Part of the Other Law Commons Recommended Citation Logan, Michael K., "From Simple to Sophisticated: The Organization of Terrorist Groups" (2020). Student Work. 3709. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/studentwork/3709 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Work by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FROM SIMPLE TO SOPHISTCATED: THE ORGANIZATION OF TERRORIST GROUPS By Michael K. Logan A DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Major: Criminology and Criminal Justice Under the Supervision of Dr. Gina Ligon Omaha, Nebraska August 2020 Supervisory Committee: Dr. Gina Ligon Dr. Todd Armstrong Dr. Gaylene Armstrong Dr. Douglas Derrick ii FROM SIMPLE TO SOPHISTCATED: THE ORGANIZATION OF TERRORIST GROUPS Michael K. Logan University of Nebraska, 2020 Advisor: Dr. Gina Ligon Abstract This dissertation draws on gang organization research and organizational theory to assess the underlying dimensions of organization in terrorist groups. Using the Leadership for the Extreme and Dangerous for Innovative Results (LEADIR) dataset, findings suggest that organization is a multidimensional construct in terrorist groups, including the structuring of activities dimension and the concentration of authority dimension. In relation to violence, terrorist groups high on the structuring of activities dimension were significantly more lethal in general and more lethal when attacking hard targets, whereas terrorist groups high on the concentration of authority dimension attacked hard targets at a significantly higher rate.
    [Show full text]
  • Zenn 1 “The Continuing Threat of Boko Haram” Testimony Before The
    “The Continuing Threat of Boko Haram” Testimony before the Subcommittee on Africa, Global Health, Global Human Rights, and International Organizations and Subcommittee on Terrorism, Nonproliferation, and Trade November 13, 2013 Members of Congress, Ladies and Gentlemen: My name is Jacob Zenn. I am a Research Analyst of African and Eurasian Affairs for The Jamestown Foundation. The views I express in this testimony are my own. Thank you for inviting me to testify before you today on the topic of "The Continuing Threat of Boko Haram." In this testimony, I will answer the following questions: • How can the U.S. support Nigeria counter terrorist groups? • Who is Boko Haram and who is Ansaru? • Where do Boko Haram and Ansaru get their funding? • Are Boko Haram and Ansaru connected to al-Qaeda? • Do Boko Haram and Ansaru present a threat beyond Nigeria? 1. How can the U.S. support Nigeria counter terrorist groups? Below are 10 measures the U.S. can take to support Nigerian counter-terrorism efforts: • Develop a ‘Marshall Plan’ for northeastern Nigeria and use those funds to build schools, hospitals, infrastructure, water sources and recreational facilities, especially after army offensives clear out Boko Haram insurgents. The program would need to be transparent and have strong leadership to ensure projects are implemented. • Label Boko Haram as a “foreign terrorist organization (FTO),” which could bring the power of international financial and anti-money laundering institutions to bear on Boko Haram’s financial sponsors. Otherwise, this label is meaningless and should be abandoned; if Boko Haram is not an FTO, then who is? • Mentor Nigerian troops in counter-insurgency based on best practices learned from years of dealing with IEDs, urban warfare and ambushes in Iraq and Afghanistan.
    [Show full text]