DOCSLIB.ORG

The Van Der Waals Equation As a Cubic Carl W

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Van Der Waals Equation As a Cubic Carl W University of Connecticut OpenCommons@UConn Chemistry Education Materials Department of Chemistry 2015 The van der Waals Equation as a cubic Carl W. David University of Connecticut, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://opencommons.uconn.edu/chem_educ Part of the Physical Chemistry Commons Recommended Citation David, Carl W., "The av n der Waals Equation as a cubic" (2015). Chemistry Education Materials. 88. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/chem_educ/88 The van der Waals Equation as a Cubic Carl W. David∗ Emeritus, Department of Chemistry University of Connecticut Storrs, Connecticut 06269-3060 (Dated: April 4, 2016) The van der Waals (from his thesis of 1873) equation is a cubic in the molar volume. Since this is the first equation of state studied in chemistry and physics more complicated than the ideal gas equation, it is noteworthy that the solution of this cubic is rarely if ever addressed. When (lowering the temperature) the two imaginary roots coalesce with the real root of the van der Waals equation we have the critical point. At Kelvin temperatures below Tc. the equation has three real roots; we explore obtaining those roots to aid in the Maxwell construction required to obtain the vapor pressure. I. INTRODUCTION The reduced van der Waals equations pr(vr;Tr) in the T p reduced variable scheme, i.e., Tr = , pr = and Tc pc v vr = , where the subscript c refers to the critical tem- It is well known that the van der Waals equation is vc a cubic equation in v whose solution is rarely addressed perature, pressure and/or molar volume and r, similarly, [1, 10, 11]. There no longer exists a reason for this lack of refers to the appropriate reduced variables, is familiarity, as computer assisted calculus programs have made it simpler than ever to manipulate the complicated 8Tr 3 pr(vr;Tr) = − 2 (1) expressions that constitute the traditional cubic polyno- 3vr − 1 vr mial solutions (vide supra). Rather than trusting a com- puter calculus program, however, this paper introduces We will derive the solution to the cubic, and then use the complete solution to the cubic using elementary al- that solution in the Maxwell construction searching for gebra. the vapor pressure. In an age in which algebra inclusion [4] in high school curricula is being questioned, it seems reasonable to ar- gue that the two years of calculus learning prior to study- III. THE GENERAL CUBIC EQUATION [7] ing physical chemistry is worth the effort. Therefore, avoiding the phrase "integration by parts" in Winn's pa- The general cubic equation is per [11] and avoiding the cubic solution which employs 3 2 only algebra (not counting DeMoivre's theorem) seems x + a1x + a2x + a3 = 0 (2) bad pedagogy. Instead, we should emphasize the useful- ness of what we've forced students to learn, validating which Cardan transformed using the prerequisite structure that differentiates STEM edu- a cation from other fields. x = y − 1 Since this solution is rather long-winded, this paper has 3 been written in sufficient detail that it should be able to i.e., be read without resorting to paper and pencil. 3 2 a1 a1 a1 y − + a1 a1y − + a2 y − + a3 = 0 II. PRELIMINARIES 3 3 3 which expands to Consider that the Maxwell construction [6] (vide infra) requires that one has the three roots (if T < T ) of the a2 2 a a c y3 + a − 1 y = − a3 + 1 2 − a (3) cubic van der Waals equation so that one can integrate 2 3 27 1 3 3 (pvdW − ptrial) dv from the first (smallest) to the second, and from the second to the third (largest) root (or vice which we write in the form: versa). Setting the sum of these two integrals equal to zero gives an equation whose only remaining variable is z3 + ηz + q = 0 (4) the pressure (ptrial); that solution pressure is the pre- dicted vapor pressure. This (Equation 4) is called a \reduced" cubic form (the mathematicians and chemists use the term \reduced" dif- ferently). We will solve the \reduced" equation for z ! y and then take the solutions and convert them back to x ∗ [email protected] at the end of the computation. 2 IV. THE VAN DER WAALS EQUATION AS A which suggests writing CUBIC 4η 2 = −3 The van der Waals gas equation can be expanded to u 2 so that 8Tr v 9vr 1 v3 − + 1 r + − = 0 r r p 3 3p p 4η r r r u = −3 which is of the form becomes the choice we have to make. Then, 3 2 vr + a1vr + a2vr + a3 = 0 (5) 3 4η 4q 4cos # + 2 cos# − 3 = 0 In terms of the original cubic equation (Equation 2), we u q 4η have −3 8Tr + 1 which is a mimic of the equation we are trying to solve. a = − pr (6) 1 3 3 3q 4cos # − 3cos# + q = 0 η 4η 3 −3 a2 = (7) pr so, we obtain and finally 3q cos3# = − q 4η 1 η −3 a3 = − (8) pr or In terms of the reduced cubic Equation 4, we have 3q 3q r−3 cos3# = − = − 2 q η a1 2η η η = a − (9) 2η −3 2 3 and which leads us to values of # for which this equation will be true. 2 a a We have q = − + a3 − 1 2 + a (10) 27 1 3 3 1 3q r−3 # = cos−1 − Consider the known equation 3 2η η 4cos3# − 3cos# − cos3# = 0 (11) which means, back-substituting r 4η 1 3q r−3 (DeMoivre's theorem gave us Equation 11) and the afore- ucos# = cos cos−1 − mentioned prototype \reduced" cubic: −3 3 2η η z3 + ηz = q (12) or, in terms of the reduced cubic equation we have r r where η and q are constants (see Equation 4) . Their 4η 1 3q −3 z = y = cos cos−1 − ≡ z commonality suggests a procedure, e.g., defining −3 3 2η η 1 z = ucos# Dividing this z −z1 into the original reduced cubic would yield a quadratic which then itself would be soluble, i.e., where u is the be chosen to force the two forms into conformance. To carry out this agenda, we cube our z3 + ηz − q z3 + ηz − q = expression for z and substitute the result into our reduced q h q i (z − z1) z − 4η cos 1 cos−1 − 3q −3 cubic, i.e., −3 3 2η η u3cos3# + ηucos# − q = 0 Synthetic division yields 2 and divide both sides by u3. Multiplying by 4, we obtain 2 2 ( η + z1 z1 − q z + z1z + (η + z1 ) − z − z1 4η 4q 4cos3# + cos# − = 0 u2 u3 where the numerator of the residual is zero! 3 The other two roots of V. THE MAXWELL CONSTRUCTION [6] 2 2 z + z1z + (η + z1 ) = 0 To achieve the Maxwell construction (see Figure 1) one are needs to integrate prdvr from the lowest root to the cen- tral root, and from the central root to the largest root, p 2 2 −z1 + z − 4(η + z ) and set these two integrals equal to each other (except z = 1 1 2 2 for the sign, i. e., using the absolute magnitude of the integrals) thereby obtaining an equation for ptrial (to be and vp called pr after solution) which we declare to be the va- p 2 2 por pressure for this particular isotherm. Alternatively, −z1 − z1 − 4(η + z1 ) R z3 = one could write (pvdW −ptrial)dv = 0 with the rule that 2 vp ptrial ! p when the equation is true. which lead to the second and third roots of the \reduced" The integral itself is trivial, i.e., cubic. Z v` Z v` 8Tr 3 prdvr = − 2 dvr 1. back substituting v v 3vr − 1 vr g8T (3v g − 1) 3 3 r `n r` + − (13) We thus have for the original cubic we started this 3 (3vrg − 1 vr` vrg 3 2 discussion with: x + a1x + a2x + a3 = 0, Equation 2, (with v rather than x): r This must be set equal to the equivalent path integral from "g" to "`" using the trial vapor pressure, i.e., r 4η 1 3q r−3 a v = cos cos−1 − 1 r` −3 3 4η η 3 Z ` p dv = pvp (v − v ) (14) (corresponding to the z1 root of the \reduced" cubic) trial r ` g where we have employed Equation 5 and its similar form g Equation 2 to return from the reduced form to the ulti- mately desired v form of the cubic van der Waals equation so the equation whose solution yields the vapor pressure we are trying to solve. is 2 a1 2 3 We had η = a2 − 3 (Equation 9) and q = − 27 a1 + a1a2 −a3 (Equation 10). It is clear that substituting these 8T (3v − 1) 3 3 3 r `n r` + − = pvp v − v (15) into our equation for v would lead to a fearful mess. And 3 (3v − 1 v v r r` rg then the substitutions which was Equation 6, Equation rg r` rg 7 and finally Equation 8 make evaluation possible. Un- fortunately, the resultant equation is enormous. This equation depends on a trial pressure which itself is vp A similar discussion for each of the other two roots adjusted until the equality holds (ptrial = pr ). However, leads to explicit solutions for all three roots. as noted by Lekner[5] [8], this can be written as 8T (3v − 1) 3 3 8T 3 r `n r` + − = p v − v = r − v − v (16) 3 (3v − 1 v v trial r` rg 3v − 1 v2 r` rg rg r` rg r` r` or ! 8T (3v − 1) 3 3 8T 3 r `n r` + − = r − v − v (17) 3 (3v − 1 v v 3v − 1 v2 r` rg rg r` rg rg rg since the trial pressure is the same at \`" and \g", or ! 8T (3v − 1) 3 3 8T 3 8T 3 r `n r` + − = r − v − r + v (18) 3 (3v − 1 v v 3v − 1 v2 r` 3v − 1 v2 rg rg r` rg r` r` rg rg or \vice versa".
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Symmetry and the Cubic Formula
    SYMMETRY AND THE CUBIC FORMULA DAVID CORWIN The purpose of this talk is to derive the cubic formula. But rather than finding the exact formula, I'm going to prove that there is a cubic formula. The way I'm going to do this uses symmetry in a very elegant way, and it foreshadows Galois theory. Note that this material comes almost entirely from the first chapter of http://homepages.warwick.ac.uk/~masda/MA3D5/Galois.pdf. 1. Deriving the Quadratic Formula Before discussing the cubic formula, I would like to consider the quadratic formula. While I'm expecting you know the quadratic formula already, I'd like to treat this case first in order to motivate what we will do with the cubic formula. Suppose we're solving f(x) = x2 + bx + c = 0: We know this factors as f(x) = (x − α)(x − β) where α; β are some complex numbers, and the problem is to find α; β in terms of b; c. To go the other way around, we can multiply out the expression above to get (x − α)(x − β) = x2 − (α + β)x + αβ; which means that b = −(α + β) and c = αβ. Notice that each of these expressions doesn't change when we interchange α and β. This should be the case, since after all, we labeled the two roots α and β arbitrarily. This means that any expression we get for α should equally be an expression for β. That is, one formula should produce two values. We say there is an ambiguity here; it's ambiguous whether the formula gives us α or β.
    [Show full text]
  • Solving Cubic Polynomials
    Solving Cubic Polynomials 1.1 The general solution to the quadratic equation There are four steps to finding the zeroes of a quadratic polynomial. 1. First divide by the leading term, making the polynomial monic. a 2. Then, given x2 + a x + a , substitute x = y − 1 to obtain an equation without the linear term. 1 0 2 (This is the \depressed" equation.) 3. Solve then for y as a square root. (Remember to use both signs of the square root.) a 4. Once this is done, recover x using the fact that x = y − 1 . 2 For example, let's solve 2x2 + 7x − 15 = 0: First, we divide both sides by 2 to create an equation with leading term equal to one: 7 15 x2 + x − = 0: 2 2 a 7 Then replace x by x = y − 1 = y − to obtain: 2 4 169 y2 = 16 Solve for y: 13 13 y = or − 4 4 Then, solving back for x, we have 3 x = or − 5: 2 This method is equivalent to \completing the square" and is the steps taken in developing the much- memorized quadratic formula. For example, if the original equation is our \high school quadratic" ax2 + bx + c = 0 then the first step creates the equation b c x2 + x + = 0: a a b We then write x = y − and obtain, after simplifying, 2a b2 − 4ac y2 − = 0 4a2 so that p b2 − 4ac y = ± 2a and so p b b2 − 4ac x = − ± : 2a 2a 1 The solutions to this quadratic depend heavily on the value of b2 − 4ac.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6 - Engineering Equations of State II
    Introductory Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics By J.R. Elliott and C.T. Lira Chapter 6 - Engineering Equations of State II. Generalized Fluid Properties The principle of two-parameter corresponding states 50 50 40 40 30 30 T=705K 20 20 ρ T=286K L 10 10 T=470 T=191K T=329K 0 0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 -10 T=133K -10 ρV Density (g/cc) Density (g/cc) VdW Pressure (bars) in Methane VdW Pressure (bars) in Pentane Critical Definitions: Tc - critical temperature - the temperature above which no liquid can exist. Pc - critical pressure - the pressure above which no vapor can exist. ω - acentric factor - a third parameter which helps to specify the vapor pressure curve which, in turn, affects the rest of the thermodynamic variables. ∂ ∂ 2 P = P = 0 and 0 at Tc and Pc Note: at the critical point, ∂ρ ∂ρ 2 T T Chapter 6 - Engineering Equations of State Slide 1 II. Generalized Fluid Properties The van der Waals (1873) Equation Of State (vdW-EOS) Based on some semi-empirical reasoning about the ways that temperature and density affect the pressure, van der Waals (1873) developed the equation below, which he considered to be fairly crude. We will discuss the reasoning at the end of the chapter, but it is useful to see what the equations are and how we use them before deriving the details. The vdW-EOS is: bρ aρ 1 aρ Z =+1 −= − ()1− bρ RT()1− bρ RT van der Waals’ trick for characterizing the difference between subcritical and supercritical fluids was to recognize that, at the critical point, ∂P ∂ 2 P = 0 and = 0 at T , P ∂ρ ∂ρ 2 c c T T Since there are only two “undetermined parameters” in his EOS (a and b), he has reduced the problem to one of two equations and two unknowns.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Van Der Waals Gas, Contact Geometry and the Toda Chain
    entropy Article On the van der Waals Gas, Contact Geometry and the Toda Chain Diego Alarcón, P. Fernández de Córdoba ID , J. M. Isidro * ID and Carlos Orea Instituto Universitario de Matemática Pura y Aplicada, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, 46022 Valencia, Spain; [email protected] (D.A.); [email protected] (P.F.d.C.); [email protected] (C.O.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 7 June 2018; Accepted: 16 July 2018; Published: 26 July 2018 Abstract: A Toda–chain symmetry is shown to underlie the van der Waals gas and its close cousin, the ideal gas. Links to contact geometry are explored. Keywords: van der Waals gas; contact geometry; Toda chain 1. Introduction The contact geometry of the classical van der Waals gas [1] is described geometrically using a five-dimensional contact manifold M [2] that can be endowed with the local coordinates U (internal energy), S (entropy), V (volume), T (temperature) and p (pressure). This description corresponds to a choice of the fundamental equation, in the energy representation, in which U depends on the two extensive variables S and V. One defines the corresponding momenta T = ¶U/¶S and −p = ¶U/¶V. Then, the standard contact form on M reads [3,4] a = dU + TdS − pdV. (1) One can introduce Poisson brackets on the four-dimensional Poisson manifold P (a submanifold of M) spanned by the coordinates S, V and their conjugate variables T, −p, the nonvanishing brackets being fS, Tg = 1, fV, −pg = 1. (2) Given now an equation of state f (p, T,...) = 0, (3) one can make the replacements T = ¶U/¶S, −p = ¶U/¶V in order to obtain ¶U ¶U f − , ,..
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical Survey of Methods of Solving Cubic Equations Minna Burgess Connor
    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Master's Theses Student Research 7-1-1956 A historical survey of methods of solving cubic equations Minna Burgess Connor Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/masters-theses Recommended Citation Connor, Minna Burgess, "A historical survey of methods of solving cubic equations" (1956). Master's Theses. Paper 114. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A HISTORICAL SURVEY OF METHODS OF SOLVING CUBIC E<~UATIONS A Thesis Presented' to the Faculty or the Department of Mathematics University of Richmond In Partial Fulfillment ot the Requirements tor the Degree Master of Science by Minna Burgess Connor August 1956 LIBRARY UNIVERStTY OF RICHMOND VIRGlNIA 23173 - . TABLE Olf CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE OUTLINE OF HISTORY INTRODUCTION' I. THE BABYLONIANS l) II. THE GREEKS 16 III. THE HINDUS 32 IV. THE CHINESE, lAPANESE AND 31 ARABS v. THE RENAISSANCE 47 VI. THE SEVEW.l'EEl'iTH AND S6 EIGHTEENTH CENTURIES VII. THE NINETEENTH AND 70 TWENTIETH C:BNTURIES VIII• CONCLUSION, BIBLIOGRAPHY 76 AND NOTES OUTLINE OF HISTORY OF SOLUTIONS I. The Babylonians (1800 B. c.) Solutions by use ot. :tables II. The Greeks·. cs·oo ·B.c,. - )00 A~D.) Hippocrates of Chios (~440) Hippias ot Elis (•420) (the quadratrix) Archytas (~400) _ .M~naeobmus J ""375) ,{,conic section~) Archimedes (-240) {conioisections) Nicomedea (-180) (the conchoid) Diophantus ot Alexander (75) (right-angled tr~angle) Pappus (300) · III.
    [Show full text]
  • Analytical Formula for the Roots of the General Complex Cubic Polynomial Ibrahim Baydoun
    Analytical formula for the roots of the general complex cubic polynomial Ibrahim Baydoun To cite this version: Ibrahim Baydoun. Analytical formula for the roots of the general complex cubic polynomial. 2018. hal-01237234v2 HAL Id: hal-01237234 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01237234v2 Preprint submitted on 17 Jan 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Analytical formula for the roots of the general complex cubic polynomial Ibrahim Baydoun1 1ESPCI ParisTech, PSL Research University, CNRS, Univ Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cit´e, Institut Langevin, 1 rue Jussieu, F-75005, Paris, France January 17, 2018 Abstract We present a new method to calculate analytically the roots of the general complex polynomial of degree three. This method is based on the approach of appropriated changes of variable involving an arbitrary parameter. The advantage of this method is to calculate the roots of the cubic polynomial as uniform formula using the standard convention of the square and cubic roots. In contrast, the reference methods for this problem, as Cardan-Tartaglia and Lagrange, give the roots of the cubic polynomial as expressions with case distinctions which are incorrect using the standar convention.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Equation-Solving: Linear, Quadratic, and Cubic
    California State University, San Bernardino CSUSB ScholarWorks Theses Digitization Project John M. Pfau Library 2006 The evolution of equation-solving: Linear, quadratic, and cubic Annabelle Louise Porter Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd-project Part of the Mathematics Commons Recommended Citation Porter, Annabelle Louise, "The evolution of equation-solving: Linear, quadratic, and cubic" (2006). Theses Digitization Project. 3069. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd-project/3069 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the John M. Pfau Library at CSUSB ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses Digitization Project by an authorized administrator of CSUSB ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE EVOLUTION OF EQUATION-SOLVING LINEAR, QUADRATIC, AND CUBIC A Project Presented to the Faculty of California State University, San Bernardino In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degre Master of Arts in Teaching: Mathematics by Annabelle Louise Porter June 2006 THE EVOLUTION OF EQUATION-SOLVING: LINEAR, QUADRATIC, AND CUBIC A Project Presented to the Faculty of California State University, San Bernardino by Annabelle Louise Porter June 2006 Approved by: Shawnee McMurran, Committee Chair Date Laura Wallace, Committee Member , (Committee Member Peter Williams, Chair Davida Fischman Department of Mathematics MAT Coordinator Department of Mathematics ABSTRACT Algebra and algebraic thinking have been cornerstones of problem solving in many different cultures over time. Since ancient times, algebra has been used and developed in cultures around the world, and has undergone quite a bit of transformation. This paper is intended as a professional developmental tool to help secondary algebra teachers understand the concepts underlying the algorithms we use, how these algorithms developed, and why they work.
    [Show full text]
  • Comments on Failures of Van Der Waals' Equation at the Gas–Liquid
    Comments on Failures of van der Waals’ Equation at the Gas–Liquid Critical Point, L. V. Woodcock, International Journal of Thermophysics (2018) 39:120 I.H. Umirzakov Institute of Thermophysics, Novosibirsk, Russia [email protected] Abstract These comments are a response to the discussion presented in the above paper concerning the “New comment on Gibbs Density Surface of Fluid Argon: Revised Critical Parameters” by Umirzakov. Here we show that: Woodcock’s results obtained for the dependencies for the isochoric heat capacity, excess Gibbs energy and coexisting difference functional of argon, and coexisting densities of liquid and vapor of the van der Waals fluid and presented in all Figures are incorrect; his Table includes incorrect values of coexisting difference functional; his paper includes many incorrect equations, mathematical and logical errors and physically incorrect assertions concerning the temperature dependences of the isochoric heat capacity and entropy of real fluids; most of the his conclusions are based on the above errors, incorrect data, incorrect comparisons and incorrect dependencies; and most of his conclusions are invalid. We also show that the van der Waals equation of state quantitatively describes the dependencies of saturation pressure on vapor density and temperature near critical point, and the equation of state can describe qualitatively the reduced excess Gibbs energy, rigidity and densities of coexisting liquid and vapor of argon, including the region near critical point. Keywords Coexistence · Critical point · First-order phase transition · Liquid · Phase equilibrium · Vapor 1. Introduction Our comments are a response to a discussion of the article “New comment on Gibbs Density Surface of Fluid Argon: Revised Critical Parameters” by Umirzakov [1] held in the paper [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Convolutional Neural Networks for Atomistic Systems
    Convolutional neural networks for atomistic systems Kevin Ryczko Department of Physics, University of Ottawa Kyle Mills Department of Physics, University of Ontario Institute of Technology Iryna Luchak Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of British Columbia Christa Homenick National Research Council of Canada Isaac Tamblyn Department of Physics, University of Ontario Institute of Technology Department of Physics, University of Ottawa National Research Council of Canada Abstract We introduce a new method, called CNNAS (convolutional neural networks for atom- istic systems), for calculating the total energy of atomic systems which rivals the com- putational cost of empirical potentials while maintaining the accuracy of ab initio calculations. This method uses deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs), where the input to these networks are simple representations of the atomic structure. We use this approach to predict energies obtained using density functional theory (DFT) for 2D hexagonal lattices of various types. Using a dataset consisting of graphene, hexagonal boron nitride (hBN), and graphene-hBN heterostructures, with and with- out defects, we trained a deep CNN that is capable of predicting DFT energies to an extremely high accuracy, with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.198 meV / atom (maximum absolute error of 16.1 meV / atom). To explore our new methodology, arXiv:1706.09496v2 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci] 20 Mar 2018 Email addresses: [email protected] (Kevin Ryczko), [email protected] (Isaac Tamblyn) Preprint submitted to Computational Materials Science March 21, 2018 we investigate the ability of a deep neural network (DNN) in predicting a Lennard- Jones energy and separation distance for a dataset of dimer molecules in both two and three dimensions.
    [Show full text]
  • How Cubic Equations (And Not Quadratic) Led to Complex Numbers
    How Cubic Equations (and Not Quadratic) Led to Complex Numbers J. B. Thoo Yuba College 2013 AMATYC Conference, Anaheim, California This presentation was produced usingLATEX with C. Campani’s BeamerLATEX class and saved as a PDF file: <http://bitbucket.org/rivanvx/beamer>. See Norm Matloff’s web page <http://heather.cs.ucdavis.edu/~matloff/beamer.html> for a quick tutorial. Disclaimer: Our slides here won’t show off what Beamer can do. Sorry. :-) Are you sitting in the right room? This talk is about the solution of the general cubic equation, and how the solution of the general cubic equation led mathematicians to study complex numbers seriously. This, in turn, encouraged mathematicians to forge ahead in algebra to arrive at the modern theory of groups and rings. Hence, the solution of the general cubic equation marks a watershed in the history of algebra. We shall spend a fair amount of time on Cardano’s solution of the general cubic equation as it appears in his seminal work, Ars magna (The Great Art). Outline of the talk Motivation: square roots of negative numbers The quadratic formula: long known The cubic formula: what is it? Brief history of the solution of the cubic equation Examples from Cardano’s Ars magna Bombelli’s famous example Brief history of complex numbers The fundamental theorem of algebra References Girolamo Cardano, The Rules of Algebra (Ars Magna), translated by T. Richard Witmer, Dover Publications, Inc. (1968). Roger Cooke, The History of Mathematics: A Brief Course, second edition, Wiley Interscience (2005). Victor J. Katz, A History of Mathematics: An Introduction, third edition, Addison-Wesley (2009).
    [Show full text]
  • History of Mathematics Mathematical Topic Ix Cubic Equations and Quartic Equations
    HISTORY OF MATHEMATICS MATHEMATICAL TOPIC IX CUBIC EQUATIONS AND QUARTIC EQUATIONS PAUL L. BAILEY 1. The Story Various solutions for solving quadratic equations ax2 + bx + c = 0 have been around since the time of the Babylonians. A few methods for attacking special forms of the cubic equation ax3 +bx2 +cx+d = 0 had been investigated prior to the discovery and development of a general solution to such equations, beginning in the fifteenth century and continuing into the sixteenth century, A.D. This story is filled with bizarre characters and plots twists, which is now outlined before describing the method of solution. The biographical material here was lifted wholesale from the MacTutor History of Mathematics website, and then editted. Other material has been derived from Dunham’s Journey through Genius. 1.1. Types of Cubics. Zero and negative numbers were not used in fifteenth cen- tury Europe. Thus, cubic equations were viewed to be in different types, depending on the degrees of the terms and there placement with respect to the equal sign. • x3 + mx = n “cube plus cosa equals number” • x3 + mx2 = n “cube plus squares equals number” • x3 = mx + n “cube equals cosa plus number” • x3 = mx2 + n “cube equals squares plus number” Mathematical discoveries at this time were kept secret, to be used in public “de- bates” and “contests”. For example, the method of depressing a cubic (eliminating the square term by a linear change of variable) was discovered independently by several people. The more difficult problem of solving the depressed cubic remained elusive. 1.2. Luca Pacioli.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING THERMODYNAMICS Andrew S. Rosen SYMBOL DICTIONARY | 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Symbol Dictionary ........................................................................................................................ 3 1. Measured Thermodynamic Properties and Other Basic Concepts .................................. 5 1.1 Preliminary Concepts – The Language of Thermodynamics ........................................................ 5 1.2 Measured Thermodynamic Properties .......................................................................................... 5 1.2.1 Volume .................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2.2 Temperature ............................................................................................................................................. 5 1.2.3 Pressure .................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Equilibrium ................................................................................................................................... 7 1.3.1 Fundamental Definitions .......................................................................................................................... 7 1.3.2 Independent and Dependent Thermodynamic Properties ........................................................................ 7 1.3.3 Phases .....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]