69 Hebb Described the Characteristics of Valuable Wildlife Trees in Coastal

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Hebb described the characteristics of valuable wildlife trees in Coastal BC as laid out by the Wildlife Tree Committee in 2012: a minimum dbh of 70cm, a minimum height of 15m, visible signs of decay “such as broken tops, cavities and hollow areas,” and a decay stage of 2-6 (2013, p. 17). See Table 7 for uses of wildlife trees by bird species. The wildlife trees of Bowker Creek were analyzed against these standards: “Based on these measures, the woods at Bowker Creek West support some highly valuable wildlife trees. The majority of wildlife trees that were identified, 50 of the 77, were 15m in height or greater. In terms of dbh, the trees may have somewhat less value to wildlife as only 25 of the them were 70cm dbh or greater, and some of these were multi-stemmed trees. Nevertheless, trees as small as 20cm dbh had evidence of wildlife use and cavity excavation, and the trees from 35cm-69cm dbh also showed a great deal of usage. Most of the trees that were identified in the survey were in stages 2-6 of decay (based on visual appearance) which is good for wildlife. The high number of trees in stage 2 indicate that there will be ample recruitment into later stages in the next decades” (Hebb 2013, p. 17). Table 7. Birds been sighted at UVic that are known to use wildlife trees (Adapted from Harrop-Archibald 2007) Bird Species Wildlife Tree Use Great Blue Heron Open nest on large tree limbs Hooded Merganser Secondary cavity nester Turkey vulture Roosting Bald Eagle Open nest on large tree limbs, hunting perch, roost Red Tailed Hawk Hunting perch Merlin Secondary cavity nester Great Horned Owl Secondary cavity nester, nest in broken tree top, hunting perch Barred Owl Secondary cavity nester, nest in broken tree top, winter roost Western Screech Owl Secondary cavity nester Vaux’s Swift Secondary cavity nester, winter roost Belted Kingfisher Hunting perch Red Breasted Sapsucker Primary cavity nester, roost, foraging Northern licker Primary cavity nester, roost, foraging Pileated Woodpecker Primary cavity nester, roost, foraging Downy Woodpecker Primary cavity nester, roost, foraging Hairy Woodpecker Primary cavity nester, roost, foraging Pacific Slope Flycatcher Secondary cavity nester, hawking perch Violet Green Swallow Secondary cavity nester Tree Swallow Secondary cavity nester Chestnut Backed Primary cavity nester (opportunistic secondary cavity nester), foraging, Chickadee winter roost Red Breasted Nuthatch Primary cavity nester, occasional secondary cavity nester, foraging, winter roost 69 Brown Creeper Secondary cavity nester, foraging Bewick's Wren Secondary cavity nester There are several invasive plant species of concern present in the Bowker Creek ecosystems. The dominant invasive species is English ivy, found climbing vertically up trees (Figure 63 and Figure 64Error! Reference source not found.) with the highest occurrence in the south of Bowker Creek (Kathrens & Jennings 2016). Additional species that are a high priority to remove are yellow flag iris, thistle, Daphne, Robert’s geranium, grasses and English holly (Kathrens & Jennings 2016). Distribution of invasive plants varies by species: “Large patches of English holly are found throughout, large stands of Himalayan blackberry are found bordering most of the area, and a high number of mature English hawthorn trees can be found in the southern portion of Bowker Creek West” (Kathrens & Jennings 2016, p. 62). See Figure 65 for a map of the distribution of invasive species in Bowker Creek. Figure 63. Thick stems of ivy climbing a tree (Photo: Kathrens & Jennings 2016) Figure 64. Tree trunks completely engulfed in climbing ivy (right) (Photo: Kathrens & Jennings 2016) 70 Figure 65. Distribution of Invasive Species in Bowker Creek (Source: Kathrens & Jennings) 71 History and Restoration The original plans for the campus from the 1960s did not preserve Bowker Creek as a natural area on campus; it was slated for “academic expansion and graduate studies” (Hocking 2000, p. 13). Shortly before the next campus plan was published in 2003, in 2001 UVic became a stakeholder in the multi- stakeholder group, the Bowker Creek Initiative (UVic 2006 & Kathrens & Jennings 2016). UVic contributed to the development of the January 2003 Bowker Creek Watershed Management Plan, which stated its vision for the watershed a follows: “The varied human uses and natural areas in the Bowker Creek Watershed are managed to minimize runoff pollution making Bowker Creek a healthy stream that supports habitat for native vegetation and wildlife, and to provide a community greenway that connect neighbourhoods” (Westland Resource Group 2003, p. i). The four goals outlined in the plan were (p. ii): • Individuals, community and special interest groups, institutions, governments, and businesses take responsibility for actions that affect the watershed • Manage flows effectively • Improve and expand public areas, natural areas, and biodiversity in the watershed • Achieve and maintain acceptable water quality in the watershed In the Campus Plan 2003, protection was given to Bowker Creek that was equivalent to all other natural areas on campus outside of Ring Road: a ten-year moratorium on development (UVic 2003). The importance of Bowker Creek to the campus with further elucidated in the 2004 Integrated Stormwater Management Plan (Lloyd). Bowker Creek, with Mitchell’s Moat and its surrounding riparian and wetland ecosystems was described as “the most naturally protected system at the University because the water is extensively filtered through surface ponds and natural bio-treatment areas” (Lloyd 2004, p. 129). In the Sustainability Report 2006, it described how UVIC had been participating for the past five years in the Bowker Creek Initiative (Robson, Corbett & Webb 2006). The involvement was further described: “From creek clean up projects to riparian area restoration, university staff have played an active role in the revitalization of this urban watershed” (Robson et al. 2006, p. 4). While this sounds as though these restoration activities were carried out on the campus itself, this was not specified in any detail. As a further project of the Bowker Creek Initiative, the Bowker Creek Blueprint was published in 2012 that defined a 100-year management plan for the watershed based on the goals and vision of the Watershed Management Plan. The Blueprint laid out recommendations for management and restoration of each reach of the stream, including for reach 15 on the UVic campus. Facilities Management was identified as the lead agency in charge of the implementation of these recommendations, which included: invasive species removal, installation of interpretive signs, a widening of riparian buffers (the vegetation on either side of the stream), and native species planting, with willow staking around Mitchell’s Moat. Student projects were also identified as a source of support for carrying out these recommendations. Perhaps the most ambitious goal, “to obtain perpetual protection of the reach beyond 2011,” would require the cooperation of many more elements of UVic to achieve. A map published in this report identified areas all along the creek where restoration activities have taken place, and this includes the UVic campus although further details of this restoration were not provided. See Figure 66 for details of this map for the headwater of Bowker Creek on the UVic campus. 72 Figure 66. The headwaters of Bowkers Creek on the UVic campus. The pink highlight indicated creek restoration areas (Adapted from the Bowker Creek Initiative 2012). 73 The UVic Campus Plan 2016 contains several references to Bowker Creek. It is designated as a protected natural area to be preserved and restored as part of the campus’ green ring, however it is not given protection in perpetuity as requested in the Blueprint. It said to implement “wherever possible” the management and restoration recommendations in the Watershed Management plan and the Blueprint (UVic 2016, p. 44). Equally broadly, it contained a policy regarding creek corridors and waterbodies, which was to preserve and restore those that are located in natural areas (UVic 2016, p. 56). More specifically, it recommended that UVic consider replacing lawn at McGill Road entrance to the university “with meadow and forested landscapes to create improved habitat and rainwater infiltration around the sensitive Bowker Creek ecosystem” (UVic 2016, p. 54). An early restoration activity, predating 2008 but possibly installed significantly earlier, are two log weirs located near the University Club, just downstream of Mitchell’s Moat. Weirs span the width of the stream and create a drop in the channel depth, while reducing erosion and catching sediment. See Figure 67 for location of the weirs. See Figure 68 and Figure 69 for photos of the weirs. Figure 67. Black lines indicate location of existing weirs. Yellow lines represent weirs proposed as part of a student project (Source: Dasanjh et al. 2009) 74 Figure 68. Southern log weir (Source: Dasanjh et al. 2009) Figure 69. Northern log weir (Source: Dasanjh 2009) 75 Invasive species work parties commenced in 2016 as part of the Public Engagement portion of the Invasive Species Management Strategy (Kathrens & Jennings 2016). The first event, an ivy pull, was hosted in October by Kathrens and Jennings with the Ecological Restoration Volunteer Network (ERVN). Five volunteers were present, mostly geography and environmental studies students (Kathrens & Jennings 2016). See Figure 70 and Figure 71 for photos from the event. Figure 70. Volunteers removing ivy stems from a tree trunk in Bowker Creek (Source: Kathrens & Jennings 2016) Figure 71. Volunteers display the thick ivy stems removed from Bowker Creek (Source: Kathrens & Jennings 2016) 76 Additional events have since been hosted by the ERVN, including in December of 2017 and January 2018, and two events in February 2018. The focus of the February events was clipping vertical growing ivy from trees and removing mats of ivy from the ground near the Alumni Chip Trail (“February Restoration” 2018). References Bokor, C., Brett, E., Brennan, J., Gryzbowski, N.
Recommended publications
  • Towards the Future of Mystic Vale

    Towards the Future of Mystic Vale

    Towards A Future for Mystic Vale University of Victoria Environmental Studies 341 Restoration Design Project Professors Eric Higgs & Brian Starzomski November 26, 2009 Manuelle Chanoine Jori Baum Daniel Struthers Karin Campbell Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ………………………………………………………………………………………………… 3 2.0 Site Analysis …………………………………………………………………………………………………. 4 2.1 Site Location and History ………………………………………………………………………………….. 4 2.2 Site Description ………………………………………………………………………………………………... 5 2.2.1 Vegetation ………………………………………………………………………………………………... 5 2.2.2 Mammals …………………………………………………………………………………………………. 6 2.3 Problem Identification …………………………………………………………………………………….... 7 2.3.1 Fragmentation and Lack of Resources ……………………………………………………….. 7 2.3.2 Lack of Community Awareness and Education ………………………………………….... 8 2.3.3 Human Disturbance …………………………………………………………………………………. 10 2.4 Past Restoration Efforts …………………………………………………………………………………… 11 3.0 Goals & Objectives ……………………………………………………………………………………… 14 3.1 Policy Statement …………………………………………………………………………………………….. 14 3.2 Goal One and Objectives ………………………………………………………………………………….. 15 3.3 Goal Two and Objectives …………………………………………………………………………………. 18 3.4 Goal Three and Objectives ……………………………………………………………………………….. 21 4.0 Project Design …………………………………………………………………………………………….. 27 4.1 Fundamental Organization of the Restoration Plan …………………………………………… 27 4.2 Scope of the Restoration Design ……………………………………………………………………….. 29 4.3 Scientific Design ………………………………………………………………………………………………. 31 4.4 Risk Management of Project Design ………………………………………………………………….
  • 2.1 Campus Ecology

    2.1 Campus Ecology

    2. Land Use 2.1 Campus Ecology Morgan Hocking UVic Sustainability Project Submitted June 2000 Natural Areas of the University of Victoria Campus 2000 Adopted from UVic Facilities Management 1999 and accessed using the Geography Map Library's Arc View program 3.2 2 Table of Contents: Table of Contents………………………………………………………….. 2. Introduction and Methodology…………………………………………….. 3. Sustainability Aspects: Executive Summary……………………………………………….. 4. 2.1.1 University policy regarding natural areas…………………… 4. 2.1.2 Ecological characteristics and health of natural areas • Introduction……………………………………………… 6. • Methodology…………………………………………….. 6. • Ecological areas of the campus - Mystic Vale………………………………………. 7. - Ring Road Woods……………………………….. 8. - Bowker Creek……………………………………. 9. - Garry Oak Meadow………………………………. 10. - Haro Woods……………………………………… 11. • Environmental health concerns - Exotic species…………………………………….. 11. - Impermeable surfaces, drainage and water quality..12. - Tree health, wildlife trees and safety…………….. 13. - Environmental Connectivity………….………….. 14. • Discussion……………………………………………….. 15. 2.1.3 Wildlife species of the UVic campus • Introduction……………………………………………… 16. • Bird survey: Methodology………………………………. 16. • Birds on the University of Victoria campus: A special report by Paul Levesque………………… 17. • Other wildlife species……………………………………. 22. • Discussion……………………………………………….. 22. 2.1.4 Human values for the natural areas of the campus • Introduction……………………………………………… 23. • Questionnaire Methodology……………………………... 23. • Questionnaire Results…………………………………….
  • Western Screech Owl Fall 2012

    Table of Contents Section Page Roles 3 Introduction 4 1.0 Background for Western Screech Owl 4 1.1 Identification 4 1.2 Habitat 4 1.3 Nesting 5 1.4 Diet 6 1.5 Habitat and Species Degradation 7 1.6 Predators 7 1.7 Human Impact 7 1.8 Pollution 7 2.0 Background for Barred Owl 8 2.1 Identification 8 2.2 Behaviour 8 2.3 Habitat 9 3.0 Site Analysis 9 3.1 Site History 9 3.2 Site Description 10 3.3 Cultural Conditions 12 3.4 Threats 12 4.0 Policy, Goals and Objectives 14 4.1 Policy 14 4.2 Goals and Objectives 14 5.0 Design 16 5.1 Task Breakdown 16 5.2 Materials 19 5.3 Expenses 20 5.4 Additional Requirements 21 5.5 Summary 21 6.0 Implementation and Management 21 7.0 Monitoring and Evaluation 26 7.1 Monitoring the Western Screech Owl Population 27 2 7.2 Monitoring the Use of the Nesting Boxes 28 7.3 Monitoring the Barred Owl Population 28 7.4 Monitoring the Ecological Integrity of Mystic Vale 29 Closing Remarks 29 Appendices 31 References 37 Roles This is an outline of each group members’ roles in the project. Certain sections were written by multiple group members. All group members were responsible for editing. Taryn Pyke: Background information for Western Screech Owl and Barred Owl; Policy Goals and Objectives; Implementation and Management Ali Chacalias: Policy, Goals and Objectives; Design Ray Lewis: Monitoring and Evaluation; Photoshopped images Logan Holmes: Site Analysis; Expenses; Photos; Appendix 1 Amelia Andrews: Introduction; Policy, Goals and Objectives; Implementation and Management; Closing Remarks; Appendix 2; Formatting 3 Introduction This report focuses on providing thorough analysis of the Western Screech Owl and the biotic and abiotic conditions of Mystic Vale, Saanich, British Columbia on the University of Victoria Campus.
  • The Victoria NATURALIST

    The Victoria NATURALIST

    MARCH The Victoria APRIL 2003 NATURALIST VOL 59.5 VICTORIA NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY na The Victoria A NOTE FROM THE EDITORS \m NATURALIST The Challenge Continues... Published six times a year by the SUBMISSIONS So Few Words VICTORIA NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY, P.O. Box 5220, Station B, Victoria, B.C. V8R 6N4 Deadline for next issue: April 1,2003 ByTrisha Cull 4 Have you noticed the new signs in hotel rooms lately? Contents © 2003 as credited. Send to: Marilyn and Ross Archibald, Editors The Royal Roads Property Many hotels have started programs in which they offer ISSN 0049—612X Printed in Canada 208 Linden Avenue, Victoria, BC V8V 4E4 guests who are staying for more than one day the option of The Victoria Naturalist acknowledges the financial support of the By Harvey Williams 6 Government of Canada through the Publications Assistance Program Phone: 250-384-3063 (no calls after 9:00 p.m. please) not having their towels and/or sheets changed daily, as used Fax: call to arrange, e-mail: [email protected] Victoria Loves Anna! towards our mailing costs. to be the case. These hotels suggest that the reason for Publication Mail Commercial Sales Agreement Number 1273108 Guidelines for Submissions ByAnnScarfe 7 offering this option is to reduce the environmental impact of Publications Mail Registration No. 09841 Members are encouraged to submit articles, field trip reports, birding Editor: Marilyn and Ross Archibald, 384-3063 and botany notes, and book reviews with photographs or illustrations if Frogs, Frogs, Frogs their operations. But, is that the only reason? Desktop Publishing: Frances Hunter, 479-1956 possible.
  • A Valuation of Mystic Vale's Ecosystem Services

    A Valuation of Mystic Vale's Ecosystem Services

    A Valuation of Mystic Vale’s Ecosystem Services Sacha Doucet The University of Victoria, April 2012 Prepared for Dr. Valentin Schaefer For the Restoration of Natural System Program, Course ER390 (Directed Studies) Table of Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................................... i Abbreviations ......................................................................................................................................................... ii Abstract .................................................................................................................................................................... iii 1.0 Objective ........................................................................................................ 1 2.0 Introduction ................................................................................................... 2 Defining Ecosystem Services .............................................................................................................. 2 The Importance of Ecosystem Services Valuation ..................................................................... 4 Valuation Methods ................................................................................................................................. 5 Replacement/Restoration Cost Technique .................................................................... 6 Using CITYgreen GIS Software .............................................................................
  • Canoe Pond Focused Ecological Restoration in Mystic Vale to Cultivate Continuity and Community Engagement

    Canoe Pond Focused Ecological Restoration in Mystic Vale to Cultivate Continuity and Community Engagement

    Canoe Pond Focused Ecological Restoration in Mystic Vale to Cultivate Continuity and Community Engagement Tamlyn Botel • Emily Johnson • Kelsey Hibbert • Coco Duan • Sunny Sun ES 341 Dr. Eric Higgs, November 2013 The group would like to acknowledge and express their gratitude to Dr. Nancy Turner, Dr. Eric Higgs, Peter Roberts, and Tanya Taggart-Hodge for their insight and guidance in the development of this document. 1 Table of Contents 1.0 - Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………………………………3 2.0 - Site Analysis……………………………………………………………………………………………………………4 2.1 - Location and History…………………………………………………………………………………….4 2.2 - Species………………………………………………………………………………………………………....5 2.3 - Hydrology………………………………………………………………………………………………….…6 2.4 - Canoe Pond…………………………………………………………………………………………………..6 2.5 - Past Restoration Efforts……………………………………………………………………………...…7 3.0 - Problem Identification……………………………………………………………………………………………..9 3.1 - Invasive Species……………………………………………………………………………………………9 3.2 - Soil Erosion………………………………………………………………………………………………..…9 3.3 - Lack of Resources……………………………………………………………………………………….10 3.4 - Lack of Community Awareness…………………………………………………………………....10 3.5 - Disturbance……………………………………………………………………………………………..…10 4.0 - Restorations Goals of the Canoe Pond Region of Mystic Vale……………………………………11 4.1 - Goal 1…………………………………………………………………………………………………………12 4.2 - Goal 2………………………………………………………………………………………………………...14 4.3 - Goal 3………………………………………………………………………………………………………...16 5.0 - Project Implementation……………………………………………………………………………………..…..18 5.1 - Goal 1………………………………………………………………………………………………………...18
  • Ecologically Sensitive Areas

    Ecologically Sensitive Areas

    ECOLOGICALLY SENSITIVE AREAS identified by the PARKS AND CONSERVATION COMMITTEE of the VICTORIA NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY The Victoria Natural History Society has identified the following list of locations, from Albert Head Lagoon to Wolf Island, as “Ecologically Sensitive Areas” (ESA). Have a look at the locations on the list and see how many you know or have visited. A map of Greater Victoria below this introduction identifies by site number the ESA areas. You will see that the summary information available for most of the Ecologically Sensitive Areas is scant with the information being collected in the early and mid 1990’s. We would like your help to update the information provided for each of the ESA locations. It would be valuable, if you know some of listed ESA sites, to offer updated information for the summary tables. We will review and check the new information with you and will post the new text in the table. In order to ensure the privacy of the people who originally collected the information found in the published tables below, we have removed their names and contact information. This information is still held by the Victoria Natural History Society. If you are an original information source for sites in this list and would prefer to have your name re-entered in the table please contact us. If you submit new information we will discuss with you if you wish to have your name included with the published information. Possibly there are other sites that should be added to this list. Please let us know of new sites that you would propose as ecologically sensitive and offer a brief summary of the location using the table headings.
  • Haro Woods - Finnerty Creek, Saanich, BC December 3, 2020 | Revision #0

    Haro Woods - Finnerty Creek, Saanich, BC December 3, 2020 | Revision #0

    Haro Woods - Finnerty Creek, Saanich, BC December 3, 2020 | Revision #0 DRAFT Overview Submitted to: District of Saanich Environmental Prepared by McElhanney Assessment (EA) & Contact Address Chris Lucas, P.Eng 500 – 3960 Quadra Street, Hydrology Assessment Project Manager Victoria BC Canada, V8X 4A3 778-747-0284 [email protected] Our file: 2243-16018-10 CONTENTS 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1 General Setting ............................................................................................................... 2 Objective ........................................................................................................................ 4 Scope of Work ................................................................................................................ 4 2. Regulatory and Policy Setting ....................................................................................................... 5 Municipal Legislation ....................................................................................................... 5 Provincial Legislation ...................................................................................................... 6 Federal Legislation .......................................................................................................... 7 3. Methodology ..................................................................................................................................
  • Restoration of the Western Screech Owl to Mystic Vale

    Restoration of the Western Screech Owl to Mystic Vale

    2014 Restoration of the Western Screech Owl to Mystic Vale Landon Benson, Rebecca Clarke-Coates, Robyn Brown, Stephanie Shulman & Samantha Shantz 3/31/2014 Page | 2 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction by Stephanie Shulman .............................................................................. 3 1.1 References .................................................................................................................... 5 2.0 Site Analysis by Rebecca Clarke-Coates ...................................................................... 4 2.1 Historical and Cultural Context ..................................................................................... 5 2.1.1 Protection ............................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Site Description ............................................................................................................. 5 2.2.1 Geography ............................................................................................................. 6 2.2.2 Species Composition .............................................................................................. 6 2.2.2.1 Flora of Mystic Vale ......................................................................................... 6 2.2.2.2 Vertebrates of Mystic Vale .............................................................................. 6 2.3 Current Activity ............................................................................................................. 5
  • Additional Environmentally Significant Areas Mapping Project

    Additional Environmentally Significant Areas Mapping Project

    Additional Environmentally Significant Areas Mapping Project Prepared for: The Corporation of the District of Saanich RFP 33/11 Prepared by: Moraia Grau and Associates PO Box 118 Silverton, B.C. V0G 2B0 [email protected] Additional ESA Mapping Project Report June 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 1.1. Background ........................................................................................................................1 1.2. Phase 1 Project Objectives .................................................................................................2 2. Methods 2.1. ESA Mapping Technical Advisory Group ............................................................................3 2.2. Public Consultation ............................................................................................................3 2.3. Air Photo Analysis ..............................................................................................................3 2.4. Site Selection ......................................................................................................................3 2.5. Field Surveys ......................................................................................................................3 2.6. GIS Mapping .......................................................................................................................5 2.7. Evaluation of the Ecological Integrity ................................................................................5 3. Results 3.1. Site Nominations ................................................................................................................8