Trial Skills Training Student Notebook

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Trial Skills Training Student Notebook Children’s Commission® SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS PERMANENT JUDICIAL COMMISSION FOR CHILDREN, YOUTH AND FAMILIES TRIAL SKILLS TRAINING STUDENT NOTEBOOK DEVELOPED BY THE CHILDREN’S COMMISSION SPRING 2021 CHILDREN’S COMMISSION The Children’s Commission was created by order of the Supreme Court of Texas in 2007 to help improve the judicial handling of child protection cases through improvements in judicial practice; child welfare policy and legislation; technology; training; and court improvement pilot projects. Chaired by Supreme Court Justice Eva Guzman, Children’s Commission membership includes officials from DFPS and CPS, non-profit foundation and state bar leaders, private attorneys, legislators, judges, and other leaders in child protection. The Children’s Commission also consults with an advisory group that represents the many and varied disciplines involved in the child welfare system. The Commission’s mission is to strengthen courts for children, youth and families in the Texas child protection system and thereby improve the safety, permanency, and well-being of children. HONORABLE EVA GUZMAN, CHAIR, CHILDREN’S COMMISSION Justice Eva Guzman has been a member of the Supreme Court of Texas since October, 2009. Before serving on the Supreme Court, Justice Guzman served as an Associate Justice on the Houston-based Texas Fourteenth Court of Appeals, having been appointed in 2001 by Gov. Rick Perry. She also served as a trial court judge on the 309th Family District Court after her appointment by then-Gov. George W. Bush. Justice Guzman has been recognized by many law and community organizations for her service on and off the bench. She is the Chair of the Supreme Court Permanent Judicial Commission for Children, Youth and Families and has served in that capacity since June, 2010. CHILDREN’S COMMISSION STAFF Jamie Bernstein Aimee Corbin Andrea Vicencio Executive Director Staff Attorney Program Specialist [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Milbrey Raney Jessica Arguijo Tiffany Edwards Assistant Director Communications Manager Executive Assistant [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Dylan Moench Monica Mahoney Chelsea Martinez Legal Representation Director Program Specialist Executive Assistant [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Jocelyn Fowler Patrick Passmore Staff Attorney Grant and Finance Specialist [email protected] [email protected] Renée Castillo-De La Cruz Willette Sedwick Staff Attorney Accountant [email protected] [email protected] ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Trial Skills Workgroup and the Children’s Commission Staff would like to recognize the leadership and support of Justice Eva Guzman, Chair of the Children’s Commission, and Justice Michael Massengale, former Chair of the Commission’s Training Committee and current Senior Judicial Advisor to the Commission. Under their guidance, the Trial Skills Training has grown from a concept to a reality which will serve to improve the caliber of legal services to Texas’ children and families. We are grateful for their leadership. The Commission would also like to express our gratitude to Judge Piper McCraw, our Training Committee Chair, and thank her for her support and enthusiasm for the Trial Skills Training. The Commission would also like to thank the following contributing authors and editors who collaborated to produce this Trial Skills Training: Tina Amberboy Peter T. Hoffman Leigh Mathews Rodriguez Judge Karin E. Bonicoro Patrick Howard Tiffany Roper Judge Gary Coley Pamela Kemp Judge Robin Sage Glenna Cordray Lori Kennedy Leslie Strauch Alice Emerson Doug Lowe Mauro Valdez Anna Saldaña Ford Jackie Sparks Martin Elizabeth Watkins Rob Galvin Mary V. Mitchell Trevor Woodruff Joanna Guerrero Amanda Molina- Martinez LaRu Woody David Halpern Dr. Sandeep Narang Tracy Harting The Commission would also like to express its gratitude to Texas CASA and National CASA for providing the initial Harris- Price fact pattern, which formed the basis of this Case Scenario. Additionally, the Commission would like to thank Hedy Bower, Professional Development Director, and the staff at TexasBarCLE for generously donating their time and resources to taping, archiving, and promoting CPS-related webinars. The Bar’s partnership with the Commission on the related webcasts “Trial Skills in the CPS Case” in 2017 and “Moving from Ordinary to Extraordinary Representation in CPS Cases” in 2015 was especially helpful in providing accessible and affordable CLE to all Texas attorneys in the CPS courtroom. Also, the Commission would like to thank Judge Camile DuBose, who oversaw this project from its beginning during her service to the Children’s Commission as the Training Committee Chair. © The Supreme Court of Texas Permanent Judicial Commission for Children, Youth and Families Finally, the Commission would like to thank the founding members of the Trial Skills Training Faculty, whose generous commitment of time and ideas helped to develop the core curriculum of the program: Justice Michael Massengale Judge Karin Bonicoro Judge Gary Coley Jr. Rob Galvin David Halpern Tracy Harting Doug Lowe Jackie Sparks Martin Sandeep Narang, MD JD Judge Robin Sage Leslie Strauch Elizabeth Watkins Trevor Woodruff © The Supreme Court of Texas Permanent Judicial Commission for Children, Youth and Families WELCOME Dear Trial Skills Training Participants, I want to extend my gratitude on behalf of the Supreme Court of Texas Children’s Commission for your willingness to participate in the Children’s Commission Trial Skills Training program to improve your legal representation skills, both inside and outside of the courtroom. Child welfare is one of the most important areas of law to our society and sense of justice. The right to family integrity is recognized as a constitutional substantive due process right under the Fourteenth Amendment, but it must be balanced with the state’s right and duty to protect children and youth when their health, safety, and well-being are jeopardized. When a family is involved in a child welfare proceeding, quality legal representation for all parties is absolutely essential to ensure that the court strikes the appropriate balance between the rights and duties of all parties involved. A prepared and well-informed state’s attorney can be instrumental in charting a legal course to help ensure a safe, speedy, and permanent placement for a child. A well-trained parent’s attorney can provide their client with information, guidance, and assistance to help them reunify with their children or identify a safe and suitable home with a relative. A zealous and educated child’s attorney can mean the difference between a child languishing in foster care or finding a permanent home before turning eighteen. While it is possible for attorneys to obtain a basic comprehension of the issues a client may be facing, it is more difficult to accumulate trial skills in this practice area. In 2013, the Children’s Commission created a hands-on training to assist all attorneys working on the CPS docket. This modified version of the Trial Skills Training will be presented under the exceptional leadership of our Training Committee Chair, Judge Piper McCraw, and in partnership with our experienced and knowledgeable faculty. These are uncertain times, but the need for quality representation for Texas children and families remains unwavering. Thank you for the time and talent you are dedicating to this training. The Children’s Commission truly appreciates your commitment to improving the delivery of legal services to the children and families involved in child welfare proceedings across Texas. Sincerely, Jamie Bernstein Executive Director, Children’s Commission TABLE OF CONTENTS AGENDA Agenda 1-5 DIRECTORIES Training Committee Chair and Faculty Directory 6-8 Faculty Biographies 9-13 Participant Directory 14 Witnesses 15 Special Guests 16 TRIAL SKILLS TRAINING Pretrial Training: January 27, 2021 SCHEDULE OF EVENTS Wednesday, January 27, 2021 2:00 p.m. -2:15 p.m. Welcoming Remarks & Review of Program - Judge Piper McCraw, Milbrey Raney, and Renée Castillo 2:15 p.m. – 2:30 p.m. Introductions of Participants, Faculty, and Commission Staff–TST Faculty 2:30 p.m. – 3:00 p.m. Case Strategy Sessions: Brainstorming about Good and Bad Facts, Choosing your Best Theme and Theory (2 Breakout Groups) –Rob Galvin and Michele Surratt 3:00 p.m. – 3:15 p.m. Break 3:15 p.m. -4:00 p.m. Laying Your Evidentiary Foundation Lecture and Discussion - Judge Piper McCraw, Michele Surratt 4:00 p.m. -5:00 p.m. Making and Responding to Objections in the CPS Case and Preserving Your Appellate Record Lecture, Demo, and Discussion- Mark Zuniga, Jack Sigman 5:00 p.m. - 5:05 p.m. Closing Remarks and Evaluations - Judge Piper McCraw and Renée Castillo 1 TRIAL SKILLS TRAINING SCHEDULE OF EVENTS Wednesday, February 3, 2021 9:00 a.m.- 9:10 a.m. Morning Announcements and Introduction of Witnesses - Judge Piper McCraw and Renée Castillo 9:10 a.m.-9:40 a.m. Crafting your Opening Statement in a CPS Case Lecture and Discussion – Judge Gary Coley and David Halpern 9:40 a.m.-10:00 a.m. Case Strategy Sessions: Preparing for Opening Statement (3 Breakout Groups) –TST Faculty 10:00 a.m.-11:00 a.m. *Practice Sessions: Opening Statement (3 Breakout Groups) –TST Faculty 11:00 a.m.- 11:15 a.m. Plenary: Screen Actor Tips: Best Practices for Virtual Lawyering in CPS Cases –TST Faculty 11:15 a.m. -11:45 a.m. Conducting a Successful Direct Examination Lecture, Demo, and Discussion – Elizabeth Watkins 11:45 a.m.-12:15 p.m. Lunch Break 12:15 p.m.-12:35 p.m. Case Strategy Sessions: Preparing for Direct Examination in a CPS Case (3 Breakout Groups) –TST Faculty 12:35 p.m.-1:35 p.m. *Practice Sessions: Direct Examination of Caseworker and Kathy Price (3 Breakout Groups) –TST Faculty 1:35 p.m.-2:05 p.m. Conducting a Successful Cross Examination in a CPS Case Lecture, Demo, and Discussion – Judge Charles Griffin 2:05 p.m.-2:35 p.m.
Recommended publications
  • ORDERED That
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ════════════════════ Misc. Docket No. 21-9029 ════════════════════ ════════════════════════════════════════════════════ ORDER SETTING PUBLIC DELIBERATIONS ON AMENDMENTS TO THE TEXAS DISCIPLINARY RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT AND THE TEXAS RULES OF DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE ════════════════════════════════════════════════════ ORDERED that: 1. On September 29, 2020, in Misc. Dkt. No. 20-9114, the Court submitted proposed amendments to the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct and the Texas Rules of Disciplinary Procedure (“Proposed Rules”) to the State Bar of Texas members for a referendum. 2. Pursuant to Texas Government Code Section 81.0878, the referendum occurred between February 2, 2021, and March 4, 2021. 3. On March 5, 2021, the State Bar of Texas Executive Director certified that the Proposed Rules were approved by a majority of the votes cast, and, on March 11, 2021, submitted a Petition for Order of Promulgation (“Petition”) requesting the Court’s adoption of the Proposed Rules effective July 1, 2021. The Petition is attached as Exhibit 1 to this Order. 4. Pursuant to Texas Government Code Section 81.08791, the Court provides notice of deliberations on the Proposed Rules, which will be held on May 4, 2021, from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m by Zoom videoconferencing. The public may view the Court’s deliberations on the Court’s YouTube channel. 5. Pursuant to Texas Government Code Section 81.08793, the Court invites written public comments. Written comments should be sent to [email protected]. The Court requests that comments be sent by April 15, 2021. 6. The Clerk is directed to: a. file a copy of this Order with the Secretary of State; b.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Dean's Desk It Is Always Sad to Say Goodbye to a Baylor Lawyer
    From The Dean’s Desk It is always sad to say goodbye to a Baylor Lawyer, but we can all take comfort in the legacies they leave behind. Earlier this month, Baylor University and Baylor Law School lost distinguished public servant, alumnus, and former University trustee, the Hon. Jack E. Hightower (LLB ’51). Judge Hightower was a gifted public servant who served as a State Representative, State Senator, U.S. Congressman, and Texas Supreme Court Justice. Judge Hightower also will be remembered as a lover of knowledge and a respected bibliophile. He was a magnificent example of the Baylor Law spirit at work in the community. You can read more about Judge Hightower’s life and work in this issue of Rocket Docket. But even as one of our great Baylor Lawyers passes away, others already are at hard at work continuing that legacy of public service. In this issue of Rocket Docket, we profile Cindy Tisdale (JD ’95) of Granbury, who recently was elected chair of the board of directors of the State Bar of Texas. Cindy is a family lawyer who has served as president of the board of directors of the Paluxy River Children’s Advocacy Center and was twice named Hood County Attorney of the Year. You’ll also learn about a new domestic violence prevention program in Williamson County that came about through the efforts of several people, including Baylor Lawyers Dee Hobbs (JD ’05), Williamson County Attorney; and Jackie Borcherding (JD ’05), an assistant district attorney for Williamson County. Please enjoy this issue. Baylor Law Mourns Passing of Distinguished Alumnus Jack E.
    [Show full text]
  • September 9, 2020 Via Email Board of Directors State Bar of Texas Texas
    September 9, 2020 Via Email Board of Directors State Bar of Texas Texas Law Center 1414 Colorado Street Austin, Texas 78701 [email protected] Re: ABA Model Rule 8.4(g) Dear Members of the Board of Directors: It is my understanding that on September 10, 2020 you will consider whether to refer ABA Model Rule 8.4(g) to the Board’s Discipline and Client Attorney Assistance Program Committee for possible adoption. Instead of referring the model rule to the committee, you should drop further consideration of this rule. As you may be aware, I concluded nearly four years ago in Attorney General Opinion KP-0123 (enclosed) that Model Rule 8.4(g) threatens the individual liberty of Texas lawyers and is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad.1 After my opinion, the United States Supreme Court concluded that state restrictions on “professional speech” are presumptively unconstitutional and subject to strict scrutiny because they are content-based restrictions on speech.2 While attorneys’ free speech rights are circumscribed to some degree in the courtroom during a judicial proceeding and outside the courtroom when speaking about a pending case, Model Rule 8.4(g) extends far beyond the context of a judicial proceeding to restrict speech or conduct in any instance “related to the practice of law.”3 The broad nature of the rule could apply to an attorney’s participation in a continuing legal education panel discussion, authoring a law review article, or informal conversations at a bar association event, among other things. In other words, Model Rule 8.4(g) will suppress thoughtful and complete exchanges about complex issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of Texas Professional Ethics Committee Opinion
    The Supreme Court of Texas Professional Ethics Committee For the State Bar of Texas Opinion Number 573 July 2006 QUESTION PRESENTED Under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct, what requirements must be met in order for a Texas lawyer to participate in a privately sponsored internet service that obtains information over the internet from potential clients about their legal problems and forwards the information to lawyers who have paid to participate in the internet service? STATEMENT OF FACTS A Texas lawyer is considering participation in an internet client-lawyer service (the "Service") that allows lawyers to participate in the Service for the payment of a fee. The Service is a for-profit business that provides an internet web site offering potential clients with legal problems the opportunity to receive communications from participating lawyers concerning legal services available with respect to legal problems identified by potential clients. Lawyers can participate in the Service upon payment of a fixed fee. Lawyers pay a fee based on the geographic areas and legal practice areas for which they wish to be included in the Service. Lawyers can be included only for geographic areas in which they are licensed to practice law. The Service is not involved in the retention of a participating lawyer by a potential client, and it does not receive any compensation from potential clients or lawyers based on retention, legal fees paid, or results obtained by a lawyer. When potential clients wish to seek a lawyer using the Service, they go to the Service web site and input their geographic location, the general area of law of their legal problem, and possibly other information relevant to their selection of a lawyer.
    [Show full text]
  • RESOURCES for VETERANS SEEKING HELP 71226 Veterans:Pamphlet 7/16/10 9:21 AM Page 2
    37813 ResorcesForVetsTYLACover4 7/14/10 9:31 AM Page 1 The Texas Young Lawyers Association and Texas Lawyers for Texas Veterans are proud to provide this publication as a service to Texas veterans, who have sacrificed much for our state and our country. We hope you find it to be a valuable resource. Prepared as a Public Service by the Texas Young Lawyers Association and distributed by the State Bar of Texas For Additional Copies, Please Contact: Public Information Department State Bar of Texas P.O. Box 12487 Austin, Texas 78711-2487 (800) 204-2222, Ext. 1800 www.tyla.org www.texasbar.com/veterans RESOURCES FOR VETERANS SEEKING HELP — MADE POSSIBLE BY A GRANT FROM THE TEXAS BAR FOUNDATION — 37813 7/10 71226 Veterans:Pamphlet 7/16/10 9:21 AM Page 1 RESOURCES FOR VETERANS SEEKING HELP 71226 Veterans:Pamphlet 7/16/10 9:21 AM Page 2 Texas Young Lawyers Association Community Education and Consumer Affairs Committee P.O. Box 12487, Capitol Station Austin, TX 78711-2487 (800) 204-2222 Ext. 1800 Produced as a public service by the Texas Young Lawyers Association. Please note that this brochure is intended solely to provide general information and is not a substitute for legal counsel. Any laws described in the brochure are subject to change at any time. If you have a specific legal problem, we suggest that you consult an attorney. 71226 Veterans:Pamphlet 7/16/10 9:21 AM Page 1 INTRODUCTION Veterans face the same issues that all Texans face: going to school, finding a job, obtaining a loan, and getting health care.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of Texas Permanent Judicial Commission for Children, Youth and Families
    Supreme Court of Texas Permanent Judicial Commission for Children, Youth and Families May 3, 2013 MEETING NOTEBOOK The State Bar of Texas – Texas Law Center 1414 Colorado Street Austin, Texas 78701 Supreme Court of Texas Permanent Judicial Commission for Children, Youth and Families May 3, 2013 Meeting Notebook Table of Contents Minutes from January 11, 2013 Commission Meeting ......................... 1 Commission, Committee and Collaborative Council Member List...... 2 May 3, 2013 Report to Commission .................................................... 3 April 2013 CIP Committee Meeting Minutes ...................................... 4 Basic Projects - April 2, 2013 Training Projects – April 4, 2013 Technology Projects – April 9, 2013 Texas Blue Print Implementation Plan ...............................................5 Supreme Court of Texas Permanent Judicial Commission for Children, Youth and Families Supreme Court Courtroom Austin, Texas May 3, 2013 9:30 a.m. – 3:30 p.m. Meeting Agenda 9:30 Commencement / Opening Remarks – The Honorable Eva Guzman 9:45 First order of business – The Honorable Eva Guzman 1. Adopt Minutes from January 11, 2013 Tab 1 9:50 Commissioner Updates 10:45 Video – Indian Child Welfare Act 11:00 Report to Commission – Tina Amberboy/Commission Staff, Tab 3 11:20 Video – Foster Youth in Court 11:30 – 12:30 Lunch 12:35 Data/Technology Committee Report – Vicki Spriggs, Tab 3, (page 17) 12:45 Basic Committee Report – Hon. Bonnie Hellums, Tab 3, (page 2) 12:55 Psychoactive Medications Workgroup – Hon. Diane Guariglia 1:05 Training Committee Report – Tina Amberboy, Milbrey Raney, Tab 3, (page 12) 1:15 Trial Skills Workgroup Update – Justice Michael Massengale 1:25 Texas Blue Print Implementation Task Force – Hon. Rob Hofmann, Tab 5 1:35 Legislative Update – Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • (Walker-Calloway System) Revenue Bonds, Series 2018
    OFFICIAL STATEMENT Dated February 6, 2018 Ratings: S&P: “AA” (See “CONTINUING DISCLOSURE (see “OTHER INFORMATION OF INFORMATION” herein) - Ratings” herein) NEW ISSUE - Book-Entry-Only In the opinion of Bond Counsel, interest on the Bonds will be excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes under statutes, regulations, published rulings and court decisions existing on the date thereof, subject to the matters described under “TAX MATTERS” herein. $6,530,000 TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS (WALKER-CALLOWAY SYSTEM) REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2018 Dated Date: February 1, 2018 Due: February 1, as shown on Page ii Interest to accrue from Delivery Date PAYMENT TERMS . Interest on the $6,530,000 Trinity River Authority of Texas (Walker-Calloway System) Revenue Bonds, Series 2018 (the “Bonds”) will accrue from the date they are initially delivered (the “Delivery Date”) to the underwriters listed below (the “Underwriters”), will be payable on August 1, 2018, and on February 1 and August 1 of each year thereafter until maturity or prior redemption, and will be calculated on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months. The definitive Bonds will be initially registered and delivered only to Cede & Co., the nominee of The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”) pursuant to the Book-Entry-Only System described herein. Beneficial ownership of the Bonds may be acquired in denominations of $5,000 or integral multiples thereof within a maturity. No physical delivery of the Bonds will be made to the beneficial owners thereof. Principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds will be payable by the Paying Agent/Registrar to Cede & Co., which will make distribution of the amounts so paid to the participating members of DTC for subsequent payment to the beneficial owners of the Bonds (see “THE BONDS - Book-Entry-Only System” herein).
    [Show full text]
  • Deans-Letter-June-29.Pdf
    June 29, 2020 Chief Justice Nathan L. Hecht Ms. Susan Henricks, Executive Director Justice Jimmy Blacklock Texas Board of Law Examiners Justice Jane Bland 205 W 14th Street, Suite #500 Justice Jeffrey S. Boyd Austin, TX 78701 Justice Brett Busby Justice John Phillip Devine Mr. Augustin “Augie” Rivera, Jr., Chair Justice Paul W. Green Texas Board of Law Examiners Justice Eva Guzman 205 W 14th Street, Suite #500 Justice Debra Lehrmann Austin, TX 78701 Supreme Court of Texas 201 W. 14th Street Mr. Trey Apffel, Executive Director Austin, TX 78701 State Bar of Texas Texas Law Center 1414 Colorado Street Austin, Texas 78701 Via email Dear Chief Justice Hecht, Members of the Supreme Court, Ms. Henricks, Mr. Rivera, and Mr. Apffel: As the deans of the ten Texas law schools, we are very grateful for your efforts to address the unprecedented challenges now confronting those who wish to be admitted to the practice of law in Texas. We also greatly appreciate the leadership and flexibility that the Supreme Court of Texas and the BLE have shown to date in undertaking significant and unprecedented measures during this crisis, all towards the goal of ensuring that a bar exam can go forward and that applicants have a safe and successful experience: modifying the supervised practice rules, offering a second Texas Bar Exam in September, increasing flexibility for bar takers to switch their exam without additional expense, implementing various Covid-19 health and safety protocols, and reducing the bar exam from three days to two. In recent days, however, the arc of the coronavirus has changed, and these measures no longer seem sufficient.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Lottery Commission
    TEXAS LOTTERY COMMISSION REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR OUTSIDE COUNSEL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LEGAL SERVICES June 24, 2015, 4:00 P.M. Central Time Request for Qualifications No. 362-15-0004 PAGE i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 GENERAL INFORMATION .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 PURPOSE ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 SCOPE OF LEGAL SERVICES ................................................................................................................................. 2 1.3 OUR VISION AND MISSION ................................................................................................................................ 2 1.4 OUR CORE VALUES .......................................................................................................................................... 2 1.5 SCHEDULE OF EVENTS ....................................................................................................................................... 3 1.6 SUCCESSFUL PROPOSER’S / LOTTERY RELATIONSHIP ............................................................................................... 4 1.7 PROCUREMENT AUTHORITY ............................................................................................................................... 4 1.8 PROPOSALS SUBJECT TO THE TEXAS PUBLIC INFORMATION ACT ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Youth Transitioning from Foster Care to Adulthood MC
    Attorney Resource Letter: For Attorneys Handling Child Protective Services Cases March 16, 2017 Current and Upcoming MCLEs on CPS-related Issues Here are two reminders about CLE that is available through the Children’s Commission website, along with a Save the Date announcement for upcoming MCLEs this spring and summer. ABA Teleconference Series: Youth Transitioning from Foster Care to Adulthood The American Bar Association’s Children’s Rights Litigation Committee, along with the Juvenile Law Center, recently hosted a series of teleconferences focused on the issue of youth transitioning from foster care to adulthood. Each teleconference session focuses on assuring a successful transition for youth and includes discussions of the role of lawyers and the courts for transitioning youth; legal issues facing transitioning youth; transition planning for special populations; and permanency and connections for transitioning youth. The Children’s Commission has partnered with the State Bar of Texas to offer 1.5 MCLE credit hours for each of the five replay sessions. For more information including links to and descriptions of each of the replays, as well as information about how to claim MCLE credit, please visit the Children’s Commission Continuing Legal Education webpage found at this link: http://texaschildrenscommission.gov/training/continuing-legal-education-(cle).aspx MCLE Video on Trauma-Informed Advocacy for Attorneys Following the Trauma-Informed Care survey and report issued by Texas CASA in 2015, the Children’s Commission, in partnership with Texas CASA and the Shield Ayers Foundation, created a one-hour training to help introduce trauma-informed care to Attorneys ad Litem, Guardians ad Litem and CASA volunteers.
    [Show full text]
  • Mary Colchin Johndroe Partner,Fort Worth
    Mary Colchin Johndroe Partner,Fort Worth 600 W. 6th St., Suite 300 Fort Worth, Texas 76102 Email: [email protected] Phone: (817) 877-2810 | Fax: (817) 877-2807 Mary Colchin Johndroe vigorously represents clients in civil litigation, including construction, contract, eminent domain, inverse condemnation, property rights, and government law cases. She has handled cases at all levels of the legal system; before commissions and administrative agencies, in trials and appeals within Texas state and federal courts, including the Texas and U.S. Supreme Courts. Ms. Johndroe joined Cantey Hanger in 1986 and was elected partner in 1992. PRINCIPAL PRACTICE AREAS Eminent Domain/Property Rights Construction EDUCATION Baylor University School of Law, Waco, Texas (J.D., 1986) University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas (B.A. Sociology, 1979) – graduate work in Urban Affairs EXPERIENCE Represented municipality in eminent domain proceedings and negotiation of property interests to extend airport runway – involved relocation of rail and utilities on more than 50 parcels. Counsel to international airport handling condemnations and risk avoidance in business disputes. Lead attorney defending large hospital against condemnations by the State achieving lucrative settlements far in excess of award. Attorney in charge representing river authority in substantial construction litigation resulting in favorable resolutions. Obtained desirable judgments as lead counsel for river authority in eminent domain and inverse condemnation. Represented municipality in defense of suit seeking to invalidate property tax resulting in summary judgment for client. Represent landowners and condemnors in condemnations in Brown, Dallas, Denton, Ellis, Hood, Johnson, Parker, Polk, Tarrant and Wise counties. Intermediary dispute resolution in eminent domain.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Ethics Laws for State Officers and Employees
    TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION A GUIDE TO ETHICS LAWS FOR STATE OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES Revised September 15, 2015 Texas Ethics Commission, P.O. Box 12070, Austin, Texas 78711 (512) 463-5800 FAX (512) 463-5777 TDD 1-800-735-2989 Visit us at http://www.ethics.state.tx.us on the Internet. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER The Texas Ethics Commission does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age or disability in employment or the provision of services. A GUIDE TO ETHICS LAWS FOR STATE OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................1 Laws Interpreted by the Texas Ethics Commission .............................................................1 Advisory Opinions ...............................................................................................................1 PART I. STANDARDS OF CONDUCT AND CONFLICT OF INTEREST .........................2 The “Should Nots” ...............................................................................................................2 Private Interest in Measure or Decision ...............................................................................2 PART II. ACCEPTANCE OF BENEFITS.................................................................................3 Bribery .................................................................................................................................3 Honoraria .............................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]