DOCSLIB.ORG

A New Jurassic Cow Shark (Chondrichthyes, Hexanchiformes) with Comments on Jurassic Hexanchiform Systematics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Swiss J Geosci (2011) 104 (Suppl 1):S107–S114 DOI 10.1007/s00015-011-0075-z A new Jurassic cow shark (Chondrichthyes, Hexanchiformes) with comments on Jurassic hexanchiform systematics Ju¨rgen Kriwet • Stefanie Klug Received: 3 August 2011 / Accepted: 13 September 2011 / Published online: 12 November 2011 Ó Swiss Geological Society 2011 Abstract A new taxon, Crassodontidanus gen. nov. of ranging from the Sinemurian (Early Jurassic) to the Hauterivian Hexanchiformes (cow sharks) from the Jurassic of Germany (Early Cretaceous). is described. It is characterized by peculiar teeth combining apomorphic (serrated mesial cutting edge of the main cusp) Keywords Notidanus serratus Á Hexanchus? and plesiomorphic features (deep root with convex mesial wiedenrothi Á Crassodontidanus gen. nov. Á Crassonotidae and distal margins in labial and lingual views; protruding fam. nov. Á Jurassic Á Nusplingen Plattenkalke lingual root bulge). This character combination readily dis- tinguishes members of the new taxon from all other known Institutional abbreviations extant (Heptranchias, Hexanchus, Notorynchus) and extinct SMNS State Museum of Natural History Stuttgart, ( Gladioserratus, Notidanodon, Notidanoides, Pachyh- Germany exanchus, Paraheptranchias, Weltonia) hexanchiforms. GPIT Palaeontology Department and Museum, Currently, two species, C. serratus (type species; Late Institute of Geosciences, Eberhard-Karls Jurassic, Late Kimmeridgian of Nusplingen, South Germany) University Tu¨bingen, Germany and C. wiedenrothi (Early Jurassic, Early Pliensbachian of NHMUK PV Natural History Museum, London, Gretenberg (Hanover), North Germany) are assigned to this United Kingdom taxon. Crassodontidanus gen. nov. is member of Crasso- notidae fam. nov. and sister to Notidanoides MAISEY, 1986 and Pachyhexanchus CAPPETTA, 1990. We consider Not- Introduction idanus amalthei OPPEL, 1854 from the Pliensbachian of South Germany, Notidanus insignis SEGUENZA, 1887 from the Cow sharks (the Hexanchiformes) form a monophyletic Oxfordian of Sicily (Italy) and Notidanus wagneri AGASSIZ, group of plesiomorphic squalomorph neoselachians. The 1843 from the Early Tithonian of Solnhofen (South Germany) three living oceanic genera, which represent mid-water nomina dubia and nomina nuda, respectively. The family predators, are conspicuously characterized by additional Crassonotidae comprises plesiomorphic hexanchiforms gill arches (one in Hexanchus;twoinHeptranchias and Notorynchus), a single dorsal fin, imperfectly calcified vertebral centra and very characteristic dignathic dentitions comprising labio-lingually flattened saw-like teeth in the Editorial handling: Daniel Marty. lower jaws. Their fossil record is dominated by isolated teeth extending back into the Jurassic (e.g., Thies 1983; J. Kriwet (&) Department of Palaeontology, University of Vienna, Kriwet and Klug 2004; Underwood 2006). Articulated Althanstr. 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria skeletal remains only occur in the Late Jurassic of southern e-mail: [email protected] Germany (e.g., Maisey 1986; Kriwet and Klug 2004) and Late Cretaceous of Lebanon (e.g., Cappetta 1980). S. Klug Department of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, The earliest fossil occurrences consisting of few isolated Wills Memorial Building, Queen’s Road, Bristol BS8 1RJ, UK teeth are from the Early Jurassic of Switzerland S108 J. Kriwet, S. Klug ( Notidanus arzoe¨nsis BEAUMONT, 1960), SW Germany needs further analyses of teeth assigned to these taxa, ( Notidanus amalthei OPPEL, 1854) and NW Germany which is not the focus of this study. ( Hexanchus? widenrothi THIES, 1983). A single species, Ward and Thies (1987) assigned Hexanchus? wie- Notidanus contrarius MU¨ NSTER, 1843, was reported from denrothi from the Early Jurassic and Notidanus serratus the Middle Jurassic (Bajocian) of Bavaria (Cappetta 2006). from the Late Jurassic to a new genus, Paranotidanus. Underwood and Ward (2004) additionally figured a partial Both taxa are represented by isolated teeth only, which are hexanchid tooth from the Bathonian of England. characterized by serrations at the base of the mesial cutting Late Jurassic records are more numerous and different edge of the principle cusp. This name, however, represents species have been described mainly based on isolated teeth. a nomen nudum according to the rules of zoological Two species, Notidanus huegeliae MU¨ NSTER, 1843 and nomenclature (ICZN, paragraphs 10, 11, and 15), because Notidanus serratus FRAAS, 1855 were reported from the no holotype and diagnosis was represented despite the Kimmeridgian of Baden-Wu¨rttemberg (SW Germany). assumption of Underwood and Ward (2004). Conse- Cappetta (1990) tentatively assigned Notidanus huegeliae quently, Kriwet and Klug (2004) continued to use to Pachyhexanchus. However, the holotype of Notidanus ‘‘Eonotidanus’’ for N. serratus and two hexanchiforms in huegeliae deposited in the State Museum of Natural His- the Late Jurassic of South Germany and northern Swit- tory Stuttgart, Germany under collection number SMNS zerland can be distinguished: Notidanoides muensteri 86237 represents a very incomplete tooth lacking useful from the Oxfordian of Switzerland, Kimmeridgian of characteristics for its taxonomic assignment. Tithonian Baden-Wu¨rttemberg and Tithonian of Bavaria, and species represented by isolated teeth only are Notidanus ‘‘Eonotidanus’’ serratus from the Kimmeridgian of eximius WAGNER, 1862 and N. intermedius WAGNER, 1862, Nusplingen. The intention of this paper is to establish a which were recovered from the Lithographic Limestones of new genus for Jurassic hexanchiforms characterized by Bavaria. The latter species is based on a symphyseal tooth teeth with serrated mesial cutting edges and a new family, that most likely belongs to Notidanoides. The only Crassonotidae fam. nov., to discuss its systematic Jurassic species represented by an articulated skeleton is composition. Notidanoides muensteri (AGASSIZ, 1843) from the Late Kimmeridgian of Nusplingen (SW Germany). However, isolated teeth of the same species occur in the Oxfordian of Systematic palaeontology Switzerland, and in Germany in the Kimmeridgian of Baden-Wu¨rttemberg and Tithonian of Bavaria. The dental terminology used herein follows that of App- Different taxonomic and systematic concepts of extinct legate (1965) and Kemp (1978). The taxonomic scheme and extant hexanchiforms were presented in the last adopted here is based on Kriwet and Klug (2004), Cappetta decades. For instance, Pfeil (1983) introduced the genus (2006) and Cione and Medina (2009). However, we use the Eonotidanus based on Notidanus contrarius to include term ‘main cusp’ instead of ‘acrocone’. N. muensteri and all other Jurassic hexanchids. This Class Chondrichthyes HUXLEY, 1880 taxonomic concept, however, was refuted by Maisey Subclass Elasmobranchii BONAPARTE, 1838 (1986), Ward and Thies (1987), and Cappetta (1990) due Cohort Euselachii HAY, 1902 to the incompleteness of the holotype of N. contrarius. Subcohort Neoselachii COMPAGNO, 1977 Maisey (1986) consequently transferred N. muensteri to Superorder Squalomorphii COMPAGNO, 1973 Notidanoides based on skeletal aspects. Additional Order Hexanchiformes BUEN, 1926 skeletal fossil selachians from the Tithonian of Bavaria Family Crassonotidae nov. subsequently were assigned to this species based on the presence of a single dorsal fin as it occurs in extant forms (e.g., Kriwet and Klug 2004). A comprehensive revision Etymology of Jurassic sharks and rays, however, provided sound evidence that the hitherto known Bavarian specimens Derived from the genus name Crassodontidanus gen. characterized by a single dorsal fin mostly (if not all) nov., which displays the characteristic tooth root mor- belong to synechodontiforms (Klug, pers. obser.). Con- phology of members of this family and the subfamily name sequently, the number and arrangement of paired and Notidanini BONAPARTE, 1838. unpaired fins and the number of gill arches in Jurassic hexanchiforms remain ambiguous. The Late Jurassic Remarks taxa N. arzoe¨nsis, N. eximius, N. huegeliae and N. daviesi were considered to be junior synonyms of Bonaparte (1838, p. 208) introduced the subfamily Not- N. muensteri by Kriwet and Klug (2004). This, however, idanini (family Squalidae) for the extant hexanchiforms New Late Jurassic cow shark S109 Heptranchias (type) and Notidanus (=Hexanchus). The well-developed; root thick and high with convex outline in name Notidanini subsequently often was used incorrectly labial and lingual views; lingual root bulge prominent; as family name Notidanidae (=Notodanidae; Owen (1846)) basal root face oblique in profile views forming an acute for extinct and/or extant hexanchiforms in the past. Gray angle; basal root face broad and slightly convex. (1851) allocated both living hexanchiforms to the family Hexanchidae, which is the correct systematic assignment. Differential diagnosis Consequently, no appropriate family name is available to comprise only extinct hexanchiforms, which do not belong The character combination of a main cusp with serrated to any extant taxon. mesial cutting edge and deep and rounded root with obli- que basal face readily distinguishes Crassodontidanus Included taxa gen. nov. from all other hexanchiform sharks although great similarities to other taxa exist (e.g., serrated mesial Crassodontidanus gen. nov. (syn. Notidanus CUVIER, cutting edge of main cusp in Gladioserratus, Hexanchus 1816 in partem), Notidanoides MAISEY, 1986 (syn. and Notorynchus spp.; root morphology similar in Not- Aellopus
Recommended publications
  • Bibliography Database of Living/Fossil Sharks, Rays and Chimaeras (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii, Holocephali) Papers of the Year 2016

    Bibliography Database of Living/Fossil Sharks, Rays and Chimaeras (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii, Holocephali) Papers of the Year 2016

    www.shark-references.com Version 13.01.2017 Bibliography database of living/fossil sharks, rays and chimaeras (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii, Holocephali) Papers of the year 2016 published by Jürgen Pollerspöck, Benediktinerring 34, 94569 Stephansposching, Germany and Nicolas Straube, Munich, Germany ISSN: 2195-6499 copyright by the authors 1 please inform us about missing papers: [email protected] www.shark-references.com Version 13.01.2017 Abstract: This paper contains a collection of 803 citations (no conference abstracts) on topics related to extant and extinct Chondrichthyes (sharks, rays, and chimaeras) as well as a list of Chondrichthyan species and hosted parasites newly described in 2016. The list is the result of regular queries in numerous journals, books and online publications. It provides a complete list of publication citations as well as a database report containing rearranged subsets of the list sorted by the keyword statistics, extant and extinct genera and species descriptions from the years 2000 to 2016, list of descriptions of extinct and extant species from 2016, parasitology, reproduction, distribution, diet, conservation, and taxonomy. The paper is intended to be consulted for information. In addition, we provide information on the geographic and depth distribution of newly described species, i.e. the type specimens from the year 1990- 2016 in a hot spot analysis. Please note that the content of this paper has been compiled to the best of our abilities based on current knowledge and practice, however,
  • Sharks for the Aquarium and Considerations for Their Selection1 Alexis L

    Sharks for the Aquarium and Considerations for Their Selection1 Alexis L

    FA179 Sharks for the Aquarium and Considerations for Their Selection1 Alexis L. Morris, Elisa J. Livengood, and Frank A. Chapman2 Introduction The Lore of the Shark Sharks are magnificent animals and an exciting group Though it has been some 35 years since the shark in Steven of fishes. As a group, sharks, rays, and skates belong to Spielberg’s Jaws bit into its first unsuspecting ocean swim- the biological taxonomic class called Chondrichthyes, or mer and despite the fact that the risk of shark-bite is very cartilaginous fishes (elasmobranchs). The entire supporting small, fear of sharks still makes some people afraid to swim structure of these fish is composed primarily of cartilage in the ocean. (The chance of being struck by lightning is rather than bone. There are some 400 described species of greater than the chance of shark attack.) The most en- sharks, which come in all different sizes from the 40-foot- grained shark image that comes to a person’s mind is a giant long whale shark (Rhincodon typus) to the 2-foot-long conical snout lined with multiple rows of teeth efficient at marble catshark (Atelomycterus macleayi). tearing, chomping, or crushing prey, and those lifeless and staring eyes. The very adaptations that make sharks such Although sharks have been kept in public aquariums successful predators also make some people unnecessarily since the 1860s, advances in marine aquarium systems frightened of them. This is unfortunate, since sharks are technology and increased understanding of shark biology interesting creatures and much more than ill-perceived and husbandry now allow hobbyists to maintain and enjoy mindless eating machines.
  • Record of Carcharocles Megalodon in the Eastern

    Record of Carcharocles Megalodon in the Eastern

    Estudios Geológicos julio-diciembre 2015, 71(2), e032 ISSN-L: 0367-0449 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/egeol.41828.342 Record of Carcharocles megalodon in the Eastern Guadalquivir Basin (Upper Miocene, South Spain) Registro de Carcharocles megalodon en el sector oriental de la Cuenca del Guadalquivir (Mioceno superior, Sur de España) M. Reolid, J.M. Molina Departamento de Geología, Universidad de Jaén, Campus Las Lagunillas sn, 23071 Jaén, Spain. Email: [email protected] / [email protected] ABSTRACT Tortonian diatomites of the San Felix Quarry (Porcuna), in the Eastern Guadalquivir Basin, have given isolated marine vertebrate remains that include a large shark tooth (123.96 mm from apex to the baseline of the root). The large size of the crown height (92.2 mm), the triangular shape, the broad serrated crown, the convex lingual face and flat labial face, and the robust, thick angled root determine that this specimen corresponds to Carcharocles megalodon. The symmetry with low slant shows it to be an upper anterior tooth. The total length estimated from the tooth crown height is calculated by means of different methods, and comparison is made with Carcharodon carcharias. The final inferred total length of around 11 m classifies this specimen in the upper size range of the known C. megalodon specimens. The palaeogeography of the Guadalquivir Basin close to the North Betic Strait, which connected the Atlantic Ocean to the Mediterranean Sea, favoured the interaction of the cold nutrient-rich Atlantic waters with warmer Mediterranean waters. The presence of diatomites indicates potential upwelling currents in this context, as well as high productivity favouring the presence of large vertebrates such as mysticetid whales, pinnipeds and small sharks (Isurus).
  • Papers in Press

    Papers in Press

    Papers in Press “Papers in Press” includes peer-reviewed, accepted manuscripts of research articles, reviews, and short notes to be published in Paleontological Research. They have not yet been copy edited and/or formatted in the publication style of Paleontological Research. As soon as they are printed, they will be removed from this website. Please note they can be cited using the year of online publication and the DOI, as follows: Humblet, M. and Iryu, Y. 2014: Pleistocene coral assemblages on Irabu-jima, South Ryukyu Islands, Japan. Paleontological Research, doi: 10.2517/2014PR020. doi:10.2517/2018PR013 Features and paleoecological significance of the shark fauna from the Upper Cretaceous Hinoshima Formation, Himenoura Group, Southwest Japan Accepted Naoshi Kitamura 4-8-7 Motoyama, Chuo-ku Kumamoto, Kumamoto 860-0821, Japan (e-mail: [email protected]) Abstract. The shark fauna of the Upper Cretaceous Hinoshima Formation (Santonian: 86.3–83.6 Ma) of the manuscriptHimenoura Group (Kamiamakusa, Kumamoto Prefecture, Kyushu, Japan) was investigated based on fossil shark teeth found at five localities: Himedo Park, Kugushima, Wadanohana, Higashiura, and Kotorigoe. A detailed geological survey and taxonomic analysis was undertaken, and the habitat, depositional environment, and associated mollusks of each locality were considered in the context of previous studies. Twenty-one species, 15 genera, 11 families, and 6 orders of fossil sharks are recognized from the localities. This assemblage is more diverse than has previously been reported for Japan, and Lamniformes and Hexanchiformes were abundant. Three categories of shark fauna are recognized: a coastal region (Himedo Park; probably a breeding site), the coast to the open sea (Kugushima and Wadanohana), and bottom-dwelling or near-seafloor fauna (Kugushima, Wadanohana, Higashiura, and Kotorigoe).
  • Whale Shark Rhincodon Typus Populations Along the West Coast of the Gulf of California and Implications for Management

    Whale Shark Rhincodon Typus Populations Along the West Coast of the Gulf of California and Implications for Management

    Vol. 18: 115–128, 2012 ENDANGERED SPECIES RESEARCH Published online August 16 doi: 10.3354/esr00437 Endang Species Res Whale shark Rhincodon typus populations along the west coast of the Gulf of California and implications for management Dení Ramírez-Macías1,2,*, Abraham Vázquez-Haikin3, Ricardo Vázquez-Juárez1 1Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste, Mar Bermejo 195, Col. Playa Palo de Santa Rita, La Paz, Baja California Sur 23096, Mexico 2Tiburón Ballena México de Conciencia México, Manatí 4802, Col. Esperanza III, La Paz, Baja California Sur 23090, Mexico 3Asociación de Pesca Deportiva y Ecoturismo de Bahía de los Ángeles, Domicilio conocido Bahía de los Ángeles, Baja California 22980, Mexico ABSTRACT: We used photo-identification data collected from 2003 through 2009 to estimate pop- ulation structure, site fidelity, abundance, and movements of this species along the west coast of the Gulf of California to make recommendations for effective conservation and management. Of 251 whale sharks identified from 1784 photographs, 129 sharks were identified in Bahía de Los Ángeles and 125 in Bahía de La Paz. Only juveniles (mostly small) were found in these 2 bays. At Isla Espíritu Santo, we identified adult females; at Gorda Banks we identified 15 pregnant females. High re-sighting rates within and across years provided evidence of site fidelity among juvenile sharks in the 2 bays. Though the juveniles were not permanent residents, they used the areas regularly from year to year. A proportion of the juveniles spent days to a month or more in the coastal waters of the 2 bays before leaving, and periods of over a month outside the study areas before entering the bays again.
  • An Introduction to the Classification of Elasmobranchs

    An Introduction to the Classification of Elasmobranchs

    An introduction to the classification of elasmobranchs 17 Rekha J. Nair and P.U Zacharia Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi-682 018 Introduction eyed, stomachless, deep-sea creatures that possess an upper jaw which is fused to its cranium (unlike in sharks). The term Elasmobranchs or chondrichthyans refers to the The great majority of the commercially important species of group of marine organisms with a skeleton made of cartilage. chondrichthyans are elasmobranchs. The latter are named They include sharks, skates, rays and chimaeras. These for their plated gills which communicate to the exterior by organisms are characterised by and differ from their sister 5–7 openings. In total, there are about 869+ extant species group of bony fishes in the characteristics like cartilaginous of elasmobranchs, with about 400+ of those being sharks skeleton, absence of swim bladders and presence of five and the rest skates and rays. Taxonomy is also perhaps to seven pairs of naked gill slits that are not covered by an infamously known for its constant, yet essential, revisions operculum. The chondrichthyans which are placed in Class of the relationships and identity of different organisms. Elasmobranchii are grouped into two main subdivisions Classification of elasmobranchs certainly does not evade this Holocephalii (Chimaeras or ratfishes and elephant fishes) process, and species are sometimes lumped in with other with three families and approximately 37 species inhabiting species, or renamed, or assigned to different families and deep cool waters; and the Elasmobranchii, which is a large, other taxonomic groupings. It is certain, however, that such diverse group (sharks, skates and rays) with representatives revisions will clarify our view of the taxonomy and phylogeny in all types of environments, from fresh waters to the bottom (evolutionary relationships) of elasmobranchs, leading to a of marine trenches and from polar regions to warm tropical better understanding of how these creatures evolved.
  • First Record of Swimming Speed of the Pacific Sleeper Shark Somniosus

    First Record of Swimming Speed of the Pacific Sleeper Shark Somniosus

    Journal of the Marine First record of swimming speed of the Pacific Biological Association of the United Kingdom sleeper shark Somniosus pacificus using a baited camera array cambridge.org/mbi Yoshihiro Fujiwara , Yasuyuki Matsumoto, Takumi Sato, Masaru Kawato and Shinji Tsuchida Original Article Research Institute for Global Change (RIGC), Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), 2-15 Yokosuka, Kanagawa 237-0061, Japan Cite this article: Fujiwara Y, Matsumoto Y, Sato T, Kawato M, Tsuchida S (2021). First record of swimming speed of the Pacific Abstract sleeper shark Somniosus pacificus using a baited camera array. Journal of the Marine The Pacific sleeper shark Somniosus pacificus is one of the largest predators in deep Suruga Biological Association of the United Kingdom Bay, Japan. A single individual of the sleeper shark (female, ∼300 cm in total length) was 101, 457–464. https://doi.org/10.1017/ observed with two baited camera systems deployed simultaneously on the deep seafloor in S0025315421000321 the bay. The first arrival was recorded 43 min after the deployment of camera #1 on 21 July 2016 at a depth of 609 m. The shark had several remarkable features, including the Received: 26 July 2020 Revised: 14 April 2021 snout tangled in a broken fishing line, two torn anteriormost left-gill septums, and a parasitic Accepted: 14 April 2021 copepod attached to each eye. The same individual appeared at camera #2, which was First published online: 18 May 2021 deployed at a depth of 603 m, ∼37 min after it disappeared from camera #1 view. Finally, the same shark returned to camera #1 ∼31 min after leaving camera #2.
  • BETTER DATA COLLECTION in SHARK FISHERIES LEARNING from PRACTICE Cover Image: Cacaodesign.It FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No

    BETTER DATA COLLECTION in SHARK FISHERIES LEARNING from PRACTICE Cover Image: Cacaodesign.It FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No

    NFIF/C1227 (En) FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular ISSN 2070-6065 BETTER DATA COLLECTION IN SHARK FISHERIES LEARNING FROM PRACTICE Cover image: cacaodesign.it FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. 1227 NFIF/C1227 (En) BETTER DATA COLLECTION IN SHARK FISHERIES LEARNING FROM PRACTICE by Monica Barone Fishery Resources Consultant FAO Fisheries Department Rome, Italy and Kim Friedman Senior Fishery Resources Officer FAO Fisheries Department Rome, Italy FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2021 Required citation: FAO. 2021. Better data collection in shark fisheries – Learning from practice. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. 1227. Rome. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb5378en The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. ISBN 978-92-5-134622-8 © FAO, 2021 Some rights reserved. This work is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo/legalcode).
  • Lowest Paleogene Strata on Vega Island, Antarctica

    Lowest Paleogene Strata on Vega Island, Antarctica

    Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 402 (2014) 55–72 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/palaeo Stratigraphy and vertebrate paleoecology of Upper Cretaceous–?lowest Paleogene strata on Vega Island, Antarctica Eric M. Roberts a,⁎, Matthew C. Lamanna b, Julia A. Clarke c, Jin Meng d, Eric Gorscak e, Joseph J.W. Sertich f, Patrick M. O'Connor e, Kerin M. Claeson g,RossD.E.MacPheeh a School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia b Section of Vertebrate Paleontology, Carnegie Museum of Natural History, 4400 Forbes Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA c Department of Geological Sciences, Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station C1100, Austin, TX 78712, USA d Department of Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th St., New York, NY 10024, USA e Department of Biomedical Sciences, Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701, USA f Department of Earth Sciences, Denver Museum of Nature and Science, 2001 Colorado Blvd., Denver, CO 80205, USA g Department of Biomedical Sciences, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19131, USA h Department of Mammalogy, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th St., New York, NY 10024, USA article info abstract Article history: The Upper Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) Sandwich Bluff Member of the López de Bertodano Formation is well Received 24 October 2013 exposed on Vega Island in the James Ross Basin off the northeastern coast of the Antarctic Peninsula. Although Received in revised form 18 February 2014 this unit is one of the richest sources of end-Cretaceous vertebrate fossils in Antarctica, it is also one of the Accepted 3 March 2014 least sedimentologically and stratigraphically characterized units in the basin.
  • Evolutionary Relations of Hexanchiformes Deep-Sea Sharks Elucidated by Whole Mitochondrial Genome Sequences

    Evolutionary Relations of Hexanchiformes Deep-Sea Sharks Elucidated by Whole Mitochondrial Genome Sequences

    Hindawi Publishing Corporation BioMed Research International Volume 2013, Article ID 147064, 11 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/147064 Research Article Evolutionary Relations of Hexanchiformes Deep-Sea Sharks Elucidated by Whole Mitochondrial Genome Sequences Keiko Tanaka,1 Takashi Shiina,1 Taketeru Tomita,2 Shingo Suzuki,1 Kazuyoshi Hosomichi,3 Kazumi Sano,4 Hiroyuki Doi,5 Azumi Kono,1 Tomoyoshi Komiyama,6 Hidetoshi Inoko,1 Jerzy K. Kulski,1,7 and Sho Tanaka8 1 Department of Molecular Life Science, Division of Basic Medical Science and Molecular Medicine, Tokai University School of Medicine, 143 Shimokasuya, Isehara, Kanagawa 259-1143, Japan 2 Fisheries Science Center, The Hokkaido University Museum, 3-1-1 Minato-cho, Hakodate, Hokkaido 041-8611, Japan 3 Division of Human Genetics, Department of Integrated Genetics, National Institute of Genetics, 1111 Yata, Mishima, Shizuoka 411-8540, Japan 4 Division of Science Interpreter Training, Komaba Organization for Education Excellence College of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 3-8-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8902, Japan 5 Shimonoseki Marine Science Museum, 6-1 Arcaport, Shimonoseki, Yamaguchi 750-0036, Japan 6 Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Division of Basic Clinical Science and Public Health, Tokai University School of Medicine, 143 Shimokasuya, Isehara, Kanagawa 259-1143, Japan 7 Centre for Forensic Science, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA 6008, Australia 8 Department of Marine Biology, School of Marine Science and Technology, Tokai University, 3-20-1 Orido, Shimizu, Shizuoka 424-8610, Japan Correspondence should be addressed to Takashi Shiina; [email protected] Received 1 March 2013; Accepted 26 July 2013 Academic Editor: Dietmar Quandt Copyright © 2013 Keiko Tanaka et al.
  • Tiger Shark (Galeocerdo Cuvier) on the East Coast of Australia

    Tiger Shark (Galeocerdo Cuvier) on the East Coast of Australia

    The biology and ecology of the tiger shark (Galeocerdo cuvier) on the east coast of Australia. Bonnie Jane Holmes BSc (Hons) A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2015 School of Biological Sciences ABSTRACT The tiger shark (Galeocerdo cuvier) (Péron and Lesueur 1822) is the largest of the carcharhinids, with a circumglobal distribution in both tropical and warm temperate coastal and pelagic waters. In the western Pacific, G. cuvier movements are wide-ranging, encompassing the east coast of Australia and south Pacific Islands. Throughout the region, G. cuvier is exposed to a range of commercial, recreational, artisanal and illegal foreign fishery impacts, as both a target and by-product species. Listed as ‘near threatened’ on the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List, suitable long term species-specific catch, catch rate and biological data are seldom available for large shark species like G. cuvier, particularly where historical commercial fishery logbook reporting has been poor. Shark control programs targeting large sharks along Australia’s east coast have been in operation for over 60 years, using relatively standardised fishing gear in nearshore waters all year round, with historical catch and effort data recorded by shark contractors. Historical catch, catch rate and biological data collected through the Queensland Shark Control Program (QSCP) since 1993 were investigated, which revealed significant declines (p < 0.05) in catch rates of G. cuvier at some tropical and all sub-tropical locations along the Queensland coast. Significant temporal declines in the average size of G. cuvier also occurred at four of the nine locations analysed (p < 0.05), which could be indicative of fishing reducing abundance in these areas.
  • Chondrichthyes: Neoselachii) in the Jurassic of Normandy

    Chondrichthyes: Neoselachii) in the Jurassic of Normandy

    FIRST MENTION OF THE FAMILY PSEUDONOTIDANIDAE (CHONDRICHTHYES: NEOSELACHII) IN THE JURASSIC OF NORMANDY by Gilles CUNY (1) and Jérôme TABOUELLE (2) ABSTRACT The discovery of a tooth of cf. Pseudonotidanus sp. is reported from the Bathonian of Normandy. Its morphology supports the transfer of the species terencei from the genus Welcommia to the genus Pseudonotidanus. It also supports the idea that Pseudonotidanidae might be basal Hexanchiformes rather than Synechodontiformes. KEYWORDS Normandy, Arromanches, Jurassic, Bathonian, Chondrichthyes, Elasmobranchii, Synechodontiformes, Hexanchiformes, Pseudonotidanidae. RÉSUMÉ La découverte d’une dent de cf. Pseudonotidanus sp. est signalée dans le Bathonien de Normandie. Sa morphologie soutient le transfert de l’espèce terencei du genre Welcommia au genre Pseudonotidanus . Elle soutient également l’idée que les Pseudonotidanidae pourraient appartenir aux Hexanchiformes basaux plutôt qu’aux Synechodontiformes. MOTS-CLEFS Normandie, Arromanches, Jurassique, Bathonien, Chondrichthyes, Elasmobranchii, Synechodontiformes, Hexanchiformes, Pseudonotidanidae. References of this article: CUNY G. and TABOUELLE J. (2014) – First mention of the family Pseudonotidanidae (Chondrichthyes: Neoselachii) in the Jurassic of Normandy. Bulletin Sciences et Géologie Normandes , tome 7, p. 21-28. 1 – INTRODUCTION In 2004, Underwood and Ward erected the new family Pseudonotidanidae for sharks showing teeth with a hexanchid-like crown (compressed labio-lingually with several cusps) and a Palaeospinacid-like root (lingually