Calculus of Variations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Calculus of Variations Calculus of Variations In this chapter, we discuss the basics of Calculus of Variations. This will provide us with the mathe- matical language|and the key tools|necessary for introducing and utilizing Lagrangian formalizm. Functionals The central notion of the Calculus of Variations is a functional, a real-valued function defined for a certain class of real- or complex-valued functions of one or many variables. The functional assigns a real value to one or more functions of the given class. We will be interested in the functionals of the following form Z xb F [f] = g(f; fx; x) dx : (1) xa Here f|the argument of the functional F |is a differentiable function, x is the argument of the 0 function f, fx ≡ f (x) is the derivative of the function f, and g is a certain fixed differentiable function of three variables. For the sake of briefness, we consider the case of one real function of one variable. Apart from being differentiable, the function f(x) is typically subject to certain constraints. For example, f(xa) = ya ; f(xb) = yb ; (2) with ya and yb certain fixed numbers. Our definition (1) is straightforwardly generalized to the cases of more than one function f, more than one variable x, and higher-order (partial) derivatives. Example 1. Length of a line in a plane. Suppose we have a smooth line in the xy-plane passing through two given points, (xa; ya) and (xb; yb), and specified by the equation y = f(x) : (3) The length of the line is a functional of f of the form (1). Indeed, Z Z q Z q Z xb q 2 2 2 2 2 l[f] = dl = (dx) + (dy) = (dx) + (fxdx) = 1 + (fx) dx : (4) xa We see that l[f] has the form (1) with q 2 g(f; fx; x) = 1 + (fx) : (5) In this example, the function g does not depend explicitly on f and x, which reflects two translational symmetries: f ! f + const and x ! x + const. Example 2. Potential energy of a flexible cable suspended from two fixed points. Choose the y axis perpendicular to the surface of the Earth, the cable being represented by a curve (3) in the xy plane, with the constraint (2). The potential energy of the element dl is proportional to its hight y and its length dl. Hence, the total potential energy is given by the integral Z Z xb q 2 U[f] = y dl = f 1 + (fx) dx : (6) xa 1 We do not care about the units, and thus set the pre-factor equal to unity. We see that U[f] has the form (1) with q 2 g(f; fx; x) = f 1 + (fx) : (7) Here the function g explicitly depends on f and fx, but not on x (reflecting the translational symmetry x ! x + const. Example 3. Length of a line in a surface. Suppose we have a smooth line L in the smooth surface S, passing through two given points, (xa; ya; za) and (xb; yb; zb). Let the surface S and the line L be specified by the equations z = s(x; y) (the surface) ; (8) y = f(x) ; z = s(x; f(x)) (the line in the surface) : (9) Let us show that the length of the line is the functional of the form (1). Introducing convenient notation @s(x; y) @s(x; y) s = ; s = ; (10) x @x y @y and using dy = fx dx ; dz = sx dx + sy dy = sx dx + sy fx dx ; (11) we get Z Z q Z xb 2 2 2 l[f] = dl = (dx) + (dy) + (dz) = g(f; fx; x) dx ; (12) xa where q 2 2 g(f; fx; x) = 1 + fx + [sx(x; f) + sy(x; f) fx] : (13) Extrema. Euler's equation A typical problem arising in connection with a functional F [f] is the problem of finding a function f that minimizes (or maximizes) the functional. With our examples, this problem comes from natural questions: What is the shortest distance between two fixed points in a given surface? What is the shape of the suspended cable? Calculus of Variations provides mathematical tools for solving the problem. Suppose the function f is a (local) minimum/maximum of the functional F . Then, for any small variation of the function f, the variation of the functional has to be sign-definite. Let us see what are the implications of this fact. We introduce the symbol δf(x) for an infinitesimal variation of the function f and the symbol δF for corresponding variation of the functional F . That is δF = F [f + δf] − F [f] : (14) With a simple observation that 0 f ! f + δf ) fx ! fx + (δf) ; (15) we have Z xb Z xb 0 δF = g( f + δf; fx + (δf) ; x) dx − g(f; fx; x) dx : (16) xa xa Then we use the infinitesimal smallness of δf: 0 @g @g 0 g( f + δf; fx + (δf) ; x) ! g(f; fx; x) + δf + (δf) : (17) @f @fx 2 Z xb @g Z xb @g δF = δf dx + (δf)0 dx : (18) xa @f xa @fx In the second integral, we integrate by parts, with Eq. (2) taken into account [implying δf(xa) = δf(xb) = 0]: Z xb @g Z xb d @g (δf)0 dx = − dx (δf) : (19) xa @fx xa dx @fx We get Z xb δF = A(x) δf(x) dx ; (20) xa where @g d @g A(x) = − : (21) @f dx @fx Equation (20) generalizes the notion of the differential of a multivariable function. Indeed, if we discretize the variable x|so that it becomes a label for discrete variables f(x), then δf(x) and A(x) acquire (respectively) the meaning of the differential of the variable f(x) and corresponding partial derivative. In view of this close analogy with the multivariable calculus, A(x) is called variational derivative of F with respect to f at the point x, with a convenient symbolic notation (note the importance of keeping the \label" x in the denominator; the symbolic character of the notation is already clearly from the dimensionality of the variational derivative: [A] = [F ][f]−1[x]−1 6= [F ][f]−1) δF A(x) ≡ (symbolic notation for the variational derivative): (22) δf(x) What really distinguishes the notion of variational derivative from the generic notion of partial deriva- tive is the relation (21) playing the key part in the Calculus of Variations. According to Eq. (20), the variation δF is a linear functional of δf. The linearity means that the sign of δF changes upon the transformation δf ! −δf. Meanwhile, the condition of mini- mum/maximum requires that the sign of variation not change. This is only possible if A(x) ≡ 0, and we arrive at the celebrated Euler's equation, the central result of the Calculus of Variations: @g d @g − = 0 : (23) @f dx @fx As a simple illustration, let us make sure that the shortest distance between two points is a straight line. Applying Eq. (23) to the function g of the Example 1, we get 00 f (x) = 0 ) f(x) = C1x + C2 : (24) [The constants C1 and C2 are then fixed by the boundary conditions (2).] Alternate form of Euler's equation If fx 6= 0, then Euler's equation is equivalent to d @g @g g − fx − = 0 : (25) dx @fx @x Indeed, by the chain rule we have dg @g @g @g = fx + fxx + : (26) dx @f @fx @x 3 Taking into account that d @g @g d @g fx = fxx + fx ; (27) dx @fx @fx dx @fx we then get d @g @g @g d @g g − fx = + fx − ; (28) dx @fx @x @f dx @fx and see that Eq. (25) is equivalent to @g d @g fx − = 0 ; (29) @f dx @fx which, in its turn, is equivalent to the original Euler's equation (23) if fx 6= 0. To put it differently, any solution of Eq. (23) is simultaneously a solution of Eq. (25), but, in contrast to Eq. (23), equation (25) has also a trivial solution f = const. The alternate form of Euler's equation is very important in the case when g does not depend explicitly on x: g = g(f; fx). Here Eq. (25) simplifies to d @g g − fx = 0 ; (30) dx @fx thus yielding the first integral of the Euler's equation: @g g − fx = const : (31) @fx Soap film. The equilibrium shape of a soap film corresponds to a (local) minimum of its surface energy, the latter being directly proportional to the surface area. Hence, to find the equilibrium shape of a soap film one has to find the (local) minimum of the surface area under the appropriate boundary conditions. Here we confine ourselves with the simplest example when the film is axially symmetric being stretched between two parallel coaxial wire circles. Let the center of the first circle be at x = 0 and the center of the second circle be at x = h; the two radii are Ra and Rb, respectively; x is the symmetry axis. The surface is parameterized by the radius r at a given x: r = f(x) ; f(0) = Ra ; f(h) = Rb : (32) The surface area, A, is then a functional of f: Z Z q Z h q 2 2 2 A[f] = 2πr dl = 2πr (dx) + (dr) = 2π f 1 + fx dx : (33) 0 We see that q 2 g = 2π f 1 + fx (34) does not depend explicitly on x (which reflects the translational symmetry of the problem) and we can enjoy Euler's equation in the form of its first integral (31).
Recommended publications
  • The Divergence As the Rate of Change in Area Or Volume
    The divergence as the rate of change in area or volume Here we give a very brief sketch of the following fact, which should be familiar to you from multivariable calculus: If a region D of the plane moves with velocity given by the vector field V (x; y) = (f(x; y); g(x; y)); then the instantaneous rate of change in the area of D is the double integral of the divergence of V over D: ZZ ZZ rate of change in area = r · V dA = fx + gy dA: D D (An analogous result is true in three dimensions, with volume replacing area.) To see why this should be so, imagine that we have cut D up into a lot of little pieces Pi, each of which is rectangular with width Wi and height Hi, so that the area of Pi is Ai ≡ HiWi. If we follow the vector field for a short time ∆t, each piece Pi should be “roughly rectangular”. Its width would be changed by the the amount of horizontal stretching that is induced by the vector field, which is difference in the horizontal displacements of its two sides. Thisin turn is approximated by the product of three terms: the rate of change in the horizontal @f component of velocity per unit of displacement ( @x ), the horizontal distance across the box (Wi), and the time step ∆t. Thus ! @f ∆W ≈ W ∆t: i @x i See the figure below; the partial derivative measures how quickly f changes as you move horizontally, and Wi is the horizontal distance across along Pi, so the product fxWi measures the difference in the horizontal components of V at the two ends of Wi.
    [Show full text]
  • Multivariable Calculus Workbook Developed By: Jerry Morris, Sonoma State University
    Multivariable Calculus Workbook Developed by: Jerry Morris, Sonoma State University A Companion to Multivariable Calculus McCallum, Hughes-Hallett, et. al. c Wiley, 2007 Note to Students: (Please Read) This workbook contains examples and exercises that will be referred to regularly during class. Please purchase or print out the rest of the workbook before our next class and bring it to class with you every day. 1. To Purchase the Workbook. Go to the Sonoma State University campus bookstore, where the workbook is available for purchase. The copying charge will probably be between $10.00 and $20.00. 2. To Print Out the Workbook. Go to the Canvas page for our course and click on the link \Math 261 Workbook", which will open the file containing the workbook as a .pdf file. BE FOREWARNED THAT THERE ARE LOTS OF PICTURES AND MATH FONTS IN THE WORKBOOK, SO SOME PRINTERS MAY NOT ACCURATELY PRINT PORTIONS OF THE WORKBOOK. If you do choose to try to print it, please leave yourself enough time to purchase the workbook before our next class in case your printing attempt is unsuccessful. 2 Sonoma State University Table of Contents Course Introduction and Expectations .............................................................3 Preliminary Review Problems ........................................................................4 Chapter 12 { Functions of Several Variables Section 12.1-12.3 { Functions, Graphs, and Contours . 5 Section 12.4 { Linear Functions (Planes) . 11 Section 12.5 { Functions of Three Variables . 14 Chapter 13 { Vectors Section 13.1 & 13.2 { Vectors . 18 Section 13.3 & 13.4 { Dot and Cross Products . 21 Chapter 14 { Derivatives of Multivariable Functions Section 14.1 & 14.2 { Partial Derivatives .
    [Show full text]
  • Multivariable and Vector Calculus
    Multivariable and Vector Calculus Lecture Notes for MATH 0200 (Spring 2015) Frederick Tsz-Ho Fong Department of Mathematics Brown University Contents 1 Three-Dimensional Space ....................................5 1.1 Rectangular Coordinates in R3 5 1.2 Dot Product7 1.3 Cross Product9 1.4 Lines and Planes 11 1.5 Parametric Curves 13 2 Partial Differentiations ....................................... 19 2.1 Functions of Several Variables 19 2.2 Partial Derivatives 22 2.3 Chain Rule 26 2.4 Directional Derivatives 30 2.5 Tangent Planes 34 2.6 Local Extrema 36 2.7 Lagrange’s Multiplier 41 2.8 Optimizations 46 3 Multiple Integrations ........................................ 49 3.1 Double Integrals in Rectangular Coordinates 49 3.2 Fubini’s Theorem for General Regions 53 3.3 Double Integrals in Polar Coordinates 57 3.4 Triple Integrals in Rectangular Coordinates 62 3.5 Triple Integrals in Cylindrical Coordinates 67 3.6 Triple Integrals in Spherical Coordinates 70 4 Vector Calculus ............................................ 75 4.1 Vector Fields on R2 and R3 75 4.2 Line Integrals of Vector Fields 83 4.3 Conservative Vector Fields 88 4.4 Green’s Theorem 98 4.5 Parametric Surfaces 105 4.6 Stokes’ Theorem 120 4.7 Divergence Theorem 127 5 Topics in Physics and Engineering .......................... 133 5.1 Coulomb’s Law 133 5.2 Introduction to Maxwell’s Equations 137 5.3 Heat Diffusion 141 5.4 Dirac Delta Functions 144 1 — Three-Dimensional Space 1.1 Rectangular Coordinates in R3 Throughout the course, we will use an ordered triple (x, y, z) to represent a point in the three dimensional space.
    [Show full text]
  • Calculus Terminology
    AP Calculus BC Calculus Terminology Absolute Convergence Asymptote Continued Sum Absolute Maximum Average Rate of Change Continuous Function Absolute Minimum Average Value of a Function Continuously Differentiable Function Absolutely Convergent Axis of Rotation Converge Acceleration Boundary Value Problem Converge Absolutely Alternating Series Bounded Function Converge Conditionally Alternating Series Remainder Bounded Sequence Convergence Tests Alternating Series Test Bounds of Integration Convergent Sequence Analytic Methods Calculus Convergent Series Annulus Cartesian Form Critical Number Antiderivative of a Function Cavalieri’s Principle Critical Point Approximation by Differentials Center of Mass Formula Critical Value Arc Length of a Curve Centroid Curly d Area below a Curve Chain Rule Curve Area between Curves Comparison Test Curve Sketching Area of an Ellipse Concave Cusp Area of a Parabolic Segment Concave Down Cylindrical Shell Method Area under a Curve Concave Up Decreasing Function Area Using Parametric Equations Conditional Convergence Definite Integral Area Using Polar Coordinates Constant Term Definite Integral Rules Degenerate Divergent Series Function Operations Del Operator e Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Deleted Neighborhood Ellipsoid GLB Derivative End Behavior Global Maximum Derivative of a Power Series Essential Discontinuity Global Minimum Derivative Rules Explicit Differentiation Golden Spiral Difference Quotient Explicit Function Graphic Methods Differentiable Exponential Decay Greatest Lower Bound Differential
    [Show full text]
  • MULTIVARIABLE CALCULUS Sample Midterm Problems October 1, 2009 INSTRUCTOR: Anar Akhmedov
    MULTIVARIABLE CALCULUS Sample Midterm Problems October 1, 2009 INSTRUCTOR: Anar Akhmedov 1. Let P (1, 0, 3), Q(0, 2, 4) and R(4, 1, 6) be points. − − − (a) Find the equation of the plane through the points P , Q and R. (b) Find the area of the triangle with vertices P , Q and R. Solution: The vector P~ Q P~ R = < 1, 2, 1 > < 3, 1, 9 > = < 17, 6, 5 > is the normal vector of this plane,× so equation− of− the− plane× is 17(x 1)+6(y −0)+5(z + 3) = 0, which simplifies to 17x 6y 5z = 32. − − − − − Area = 1 P~ Q P~ R = 1 < 1, 2, 1 > < 3, 1, 9 > = √350 2 | × | 2 | − − − × | 2 2. Let f(x, y)=(x y)3 +2xy + x2 y. Find the linear approximation L(x, y) near the point (1, 2). − − 2 2 2 2 Solution: fx = 3x 6xy +3y +2y +2x and fy = 3x +6xy 3y +2x 1, so − − − − fx(1, 2) = 9 and fy(1, 2) = 2. Then the linear approximation of f at (1, 2) is given by − L(x, y)= f(1, 2)+ fx(1, 2)(x 1) + fy(1, 2)(y 2)=2+9(x 1)+( 2)(y 2). − − − − − 3. Find the distance between the parallel planes x +2y z = 1 and 3x +6y 3z = 3. − − − Use the following formula to find the distance between the given parallel planes ax0+by0+cz0+d D = | 2 2 2 | . Use a point from the second plane (for example (1, 0, 0)) as (x ,y , z ) √a +b +c 0 0 0 and the coefficents from the first plane a = 1, b = 2, c = 1, and d = 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Math 56A: Introduction to Stochastic Processes and Models
    Math 56a: Introduction to Stochastic Processes and Models Kiyoshi Igusa, Mathematics August 31, 2006 A stochastic process is a random process which evolves with time. The basic model is the Markov chain. This is a set of “states” together with transition probabilities from one state to another. For example, in simple epidemic models there are only two states: S = “susceptible” and I = “infected.” The probability of going from S to I increases with the size of I. In the simplest model The S → I probability is proportional to I, the I → S probability is constant and time is discrete (for example, events happen only once per day). In the corresponding deterministic model we would have a first order recursion. In a continuous time Markov chain, transition events can occur at any time with a certain prob- ability density. The corresponding deterministic model is a first order differential equation. This includes the “general stochastic epidemic.” The number of states in a Markov chain is either finite or countably infinite. When the collection of states becomes a continuum, e.g., the price of a stock option, we no longer have a “Markov chain.” We have a more general stochastic process. Under very general conditions we obtain a Wiener process, also known as Brownian motion. The mathematics of hedging implies that stock options should be priced as if they are exactly given by this process. Ito’s formula explains how to calculate (or try to calculate) stochastic integrals which give the long term expected values for a Wiener process. This course will be a theoretical mathematics course.
    [Show full text]
  • Stokes' Theorem
    V13.3 Stokes’ Theorem 3. Proof of Stokes’ Theorem. We will prove Stokes’ theorem for a vector field of the form P (x, y, z) k . That is, we will show, with the usual notations, (3) P (x, y, z) dz = curl (P k ) · n dS . � C � �S We assume S is given as the graph of z = f(x, y) over a region R of the xy-plane; we let C be the boundary of S, and C ′ the boundary of R. We take n on S to be pointing generally upwards, so that |n · k | = n · k . To prove (3), we turn the left side into a line integral around C ′, and the right side into a double integral over R, both in the xy-plane. Then we show that these two integrals are equal by Green’s theorem. To calculate the line integrals around C and C ′, we parametrize these curves. Let ′ C : x = x(t), y = y(t), t0 ≤ t ≤ t1 be a parametrization of the curve C ′ in the xy-plane; then C : x = x(t), y = y(t), z = f(x(t), y(t)), t0 ≤ t ≤ t1 gives a corresponding parametrization of the space curve C lying over it, since C lies on the surface z = f(x, y). Attacking the line integral first, we claim that (4) P (x, y, z) dz = P (x, y, f(x, y))(fxdx + fydy) . � C � C′ This looks reasonable purely formally, since we get the right side by substituting into the left side the expressions for z and dz in terms of x and y: z = f(x, y), dz = fxdx + fydy.
    [Show full text]
  • Generalized Stokes' Theorem
    Chapter 4 Generalized Stokes’ Theorem “It is very difficult for us, placed as we have been from earliest childhood in a condition of training, to say what would have been our feelings had such training never taken place.” Sir George Stokes, 1st Baronet 4.1. Manifolds with Boundary We have seen in the Chapter 3 that Green’s, Stokes’ and Divergence Theorem in Multivariable Calculus can be unified together using the language of differential forms. In this chapter, we will generalize Stokes’ Theorem to higher dimensional and abstract manifolds. These classic theorems and their generalizations concern about an integral over a manifold with an integral over its boundary. In this section, we will first rigorously define the notion of a boundary for abstract manifolds. Heuristically, an interior point of a manifold locally looks like a ball in Euclidean space, whereas a boundary point locally looks like an upper-half space. n 4.1.1. Smooth Functions on Upper-Half Spaces. From now on, we denote R+ := n n f(u1, ... , un) 2 R : un ≥ 0g which is the upper-half space of R . Under the subspace n n n topology, we say a subset V ⊂ R+ is open in R+ if there exists a set Ve ⊂ R open in n n n R such that V = Ve \ R+. It is intuitively clear that if V ⊂ R+ is disjoint from the n n n subspace fun = 0g of R , then V is open in R+ if and only if V is open in R . n n Now consider a set V ⊂ R+ which is open in R+ and that V \ fun = 0g 6= Æ.
    [Show full text]
  • Calculus of Variations
    Calculus of Variations The biggest step from derivatives with one variable to derivatives with many variables is from one to two. After that, going from two to three was just more algebra and more complicated pictures. Now the step will be from a finite number of variables to an infinite number. That will require a new set of tools, yet in many ways the techniques are not very different from those you know. If you've never read chapter 19 of volume II of the Feynman Lectures in Physics, now would be a good time. It's a classic introduction to the area. For a deeper look at the subject, pick up MacCluer's book referred to in the Bibliography at the beginning of this book. 16.1 Examples What line provides the shortest distance between two points? A straight line of course, no surprise there. But not so fast, with a few twists on the question the result won't be nearly as obvious. How do I measure the length of a curved (or even straight) line? Typically with a ruler. For the curved line I have to do successive approximations, breaking the curve into small pieces and adding the finite number of lengths, eventually taking a limit to express the answer as an integral. Even with a straight line I will do the same thing if my ruler isn't long enough. Put this in terms of how you do the measurement: Go to a local store and purchase a ruler. It's made out of some real material, say brass.
    [Show full text]
  • May 1, 2019 LECTURE 25
    May 1, 2019 LECTURE 25: DIFFERENTIAL FORMS. 110.211 HONORS MULTIVARIABLE CALCULUS PROFESSOR RICHARD BROWN Synopsis. A continuation of the last three lectures on differential forms and their structure. P n 25.1. More notation. For ! = Fi1i2···im dxi1 ^· · ·^ dxim a differential m-form on M ⊂ R , n ≥ m, X ! = ··· Fi1i2···im dxi1 ^ · · · ^ dxim ; ˆM ˆ ˆM | {z } n-integrals where M is an m-dimensional region in Rn. Note that the order of the form and the dimension of the region integrated over will agree. Definition 25.1. Let f : D ⊂ Rn ! R be a C1-function. Then the exterior derivative of f, denoted df, is the 1-form @f @f df = dx1 + ::: + dxn = Df(x) dx = rf • dx: @x1 @xn P For ! = Fi1i2···im dxi1 ^ · · · ^ dxim a differential m-form, the differential (m + 1)-form X d! = d(Fi1i2···im ) ^ dxi1 ^ · · · ^ dxim is called the exterior derivative of !. Some notes: • We call a C1-function f : D ⊂ Rn ! R a (differential) 0-form. Thus the exterior derivative of a function is simply its differential, a 1-form. Thus theexterior derivative of any differential m-form is always an (m + 1)-form. • For each set of indices, the term d(Fi1i2···im ) is the standard differential of a function, and is a 1-form. Upon writing it out, one must then address any and all simplifications and cancellations, which can be many. Example 25.1. Let ! = x2y dx − x dy be a C1 1-form on R2. Then d! = d(x2y) ^ dx − d(x) ^ dy = (2xy dx + x2 dy) ^ dx − (1 dx − 0 dy) ^ dy = 2xy dx ^ dx + x2 dy ^ dx − dx ^ dy = −(1 + x2) dx ^ dy: So what is d(d!) = d2!? (Hint: Is it possible to have a 3-form on the plane?) Here d(d!) = d(−(1 + x2)) dx ^ dy = −2x dx ^ dx ^ dy = 0: (Why?) 1 2 110.211 HONORS MULTIVARIABLE CALCULUS PROFESSOR RICHARD BROWN Example 25.2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Calculus of Variations
    The Calculus of Variations Jeff Calder January 19, 2017 Contents 1 Introduction2 1.1 Examples.......................................2 2 The Euler-Lagrange equation6 2.1 The gradient interpretation............................. 10 3 Examples continued 12 3.1 Shortest path..................................... 12 3.2 The brachistochrone problem............................ 13 3.3 Minimal surfaces................................... 16 3.4 Minimal surface of revolution............................ 18 3.5 Image restoration................................... 22 3.6 Image segmentation................................. 27 4 The Lagrange multiplier 30 4.1 Isoperimetric inequality............................... 31 5 Sufficient conditions 34 5.1 Basic theory of convex functions.......................... 35 5.2 Convexity is a sufficient condition.......................... 37 A Mathematical preliminaries 38 A.1 Integration...................................... 38 A.2 Inequalities...................................... 39 A.3 Partial derivatives.................................. 40 A.4 Rules for differentiation............................... 41 A.5 Taylor series...................................... 43 A.5.1 One dimension................................ 43 A.5.2 Higher dimensions.............................. 44 A.6 Topology....................................... 47 A.7 Function spaces.................................... 48 A.8 Integration by parts................................. 50 A.9 Vanishing lemma................................... 51 A.10 Total variation
    [Show full text]
  • Corral's Vector Calculus
    1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 z 0 -0.2 -10 -0.4 -5 -10 0 -5 x 0 5 5 y 10 10 CORRAL’S VECTOR CALCULUS Michael Corral and Anton Petrunin Corral’s Vector Calculus Michael Corral and Anton Petrunin About the author: Michael Corral is an Adjunct Faculty member of the Department of Mathematics at Schoolcraft College. He received a B.A. in Mathematics from the University of California at Berkeley, and received an M.A. in Mathematics and an M.S. in Industrial & Operations Engineering from the University of Michigan. This text was typeset in LATEX2ε with the KOMA-Script bundle, using the GNU Emacs text editor on a Fedora Linux system. The graphics were created using MetaPost, PGF, and Gnuplot. Copyright ©2016 Anton Petrunin. Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled “GNU Free Documentation License”. Preface This book covers calculus in two and three variables. It is suitable for a one-semester course, normally known as “Vector Calculus”, “Multivariable Calculus”, or simply “Calculus III”. The prerequisites are the standard courses in single-variable calculus (also known as Cal- culus I and II). The exercises are divided into three categories: A, B and C. The A exercises are mostly of a routine computational nature, the B exercises are slightly more involved, and the C exercises usually require some effort or insight to solve.
    [Show full text]