Utility of Magnetic Resonance Arteriography for Distal Lower Extremity Revascularization

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Utility of Magnetic Resonance Arteriography for Distal Lower Extremity Revascularization CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Utility of magnetic resonance arteriography for distal lower extremity revascularization Thomas S. Huber, MD, PhD, Martin R. Back, MD, R. James Ballinger, MD, PhD, William C. Culp, MD, Timothy C. Flynn, MD, Paul S. Kubilis, MS, and James M. Seeger, MD, Gainesville, Fla. Purpose: Magnetic resonance arteriography (MRA) of the lower extremities affords several possible advantages over conventional contrast arteriography (CA). We hypothesized that MRA of the infrageniculate vessels was sufficiently accurate to replace CA before revascularization procedures in patients with limb-threatening ischemia. Methods: Fifty-three extremities in 49 patients were prospectively evaluated before at- tempted infrageniculate revascularization procedures with preoperative infrageniculate time-of-flight MRA (cost, $170/study) and standard contrast arteriography (cost, $1310/study) of the aortoiliac and runoff vessels. Independent operative plans were formulated based on the MRA and CA results before the revascularization procedure. Intraoperative, prebypass arteriograms (IOA; cost, $46/study) were obtained in all patients to confirm the adequacy of the distal runoff. The preoperative plans formulated by the results of MRA and CA were compared with the actual procedure performed based on the IOA. All arteriograms (CA, MRA, IOA) were reviewed after the operation by two independent reviewers, and the number of patent vessel segments and those with < 50% stenosis was determined. Results: Revascularization procedures were performed in 44 of 53 extremities (83%), and amputation was performed in nine extremities (17%) because of an absence of a suitable bypass target. The CA and MRA were equally effective in predicting the optimal operative plans as determined from IOA (CA, 42 of 53 [77%] vs MRA, 40 of 53 [75%]; p = 0.79). More patent vessel segments were seen on CA than MRA (reviewer A, 229 vs 174, kappa = 0.32; reviewer B, 321 vs 314, kappa = 0.46); however, a comparable number of segments were seen ifthe vessels of the foot were excluded. The accuracy (reviewer A, 78% vs 68%, p = 0.003; reviewer B, 75% vs 67%, p = 0.003) and sensitivity (reviewer A, 69% vs 51%, p = 0.001; reviewer B, 68% vs 46%, p = 0.0001) of CA relative to IOA were superior to those of MRA, although the specificity was comparable (reviewer A, 86% vs 90%, p = 0.31; reviewer B, 82% vs 87%, p = 0.52). The combination of MRA and IOA would have resulted in the optimal operative plan in 51 of the 53 cases (96%) and was comparable with CA and IOA (53 of 53; 100%; p = 0.50). Substitution of MRA and IOA for CA and IOA could potentiaUy have saved an estimated $60,420. Conclusions: The combination of MRA and IOA provides an accurate, cost-efficient strategy for visualization of the infrageniculate vessels before revascularization procedures. (J Vasc Surg 1997;26:415-24.) From the Section ofVascular Surgery (Drs. Huber, Back, Flynn, Supported in part by a Clinical Research Small Grants Award from and Seeger), the Section of Magnetic •esonance Imaging (Dr. Be Shands Hospital at the University of Florida College of Ballinger), and the Section of Interventional Radiology (Dr. Medicine. Culp), University ofFlorida College of Medicine; the Section of Presented at the Twenty-first Annual Meeting of The Southern Vascular Surgery (Drs. I-tuber, Back, Flynn, and Seeger), the Association for Vascular Surgery, Coronado, Calif., Jan. 22-25, Section of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (Dr. Ballinger), and 1997. the Section of Interventional Radiology (Dr. Culp), Gainesville Reprint requests: Thomas S. Huber, MD, PhD, Section of Vascular Veterans Administration Medical Center; and the Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Florida CoUege of Biostatistics (P. S. Kubilis), Department ofStatistics, University Medicine, PO Box 100286, Gainesville, FL 32610-0286. of Florida College of Liberal Arts and Sciences. 24/6/82583 415 JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY 416 Huber et al. September 1997 The clinical utility of magnetic resonance arte- of the vasculature to allow accurate operative plan- riography (MRA) for lower extremity arterial revas- ning in paticnts with limb-threatening ischemia. cularization remains unresolved. The technique of_ fers several practical and theoretical advantages over PATIENTS AND METHODS conventional contrast arteriography (CA). Specifi- Study design. Patients with limb-threatening cally, MRA is noninvasive and does not require intra- ischemia who were undergoing evaluation for infra- vascular contrast; therefore, the potential complica- geniculate arterial revascularization were prospec- tions associated with CA as a result of both the tively enrolled in the study. All patients underwent vascular access and the contrast agent are avoided. standard preoperative evaluation including both Furthermore, MRA has been reported to provide time-of-flight MRA of the infrageniculate vessels and better visualization of the distal arterial vasculature >4 CA of the aortoiliac and runoff vessels. Operative and may be more cost-effective,s8 plans were formulated independently on the basis of The widespread application of MRA in patients the CA and the MRA results by the attending sur- with peripheral vascular occlusive disease is contin- geon, and the most suitable distal bypass target was gent on adequate visualization of the vasculature selected. An amputation was planned if no bypass necessary for successful bypass procedures. However, target could be identified. An intraoperative arterio- the studies that have examined the adequacy of MRA gram (IOA) was performed before revascularization for lower extremity revascularization procedures or amputation, and the optimal procedure was se- have reported contradictory results. Owen et al. 1 lected on the basis of the results of the "gold" stan- reported that MRA of the vessels below the adductor dard, IOA. 11 The actual procedure performed and canal was superior to CA and facilitated revascular- the optimal bypass target selected were compared ization in 17% of the patients who had been deemed with those predicted by the preoperative CA and unreconstructable by CA. Hoch et al.7 compared MRA. All three imaging studies (CA, MRA, IOA) digital subtraction arteriography (DSA) with MRA were subsequently reviewed after surgery by two for patients undergoing infrainguinal revasculariza- independent vascular surgeons in a blinded fash- tion and concluded that MRA alone was sufficient. ion. The number of patent vessel segments and the Carpenter et al. ó and Cambria et al.8 have extended number of segments with <50% stenosis were de- these observations and have reported series of lower termined during the postoperative review. In addi- extremity revascularization procedures using MRA as tion, a post hoc analysis was performed to derer- the sole imaging technique. In contrast, Snidow et mine whether the site of cannulation for the IOA al. 9 reported that the treatment plan generated by that was selected on the basis of the CA or MRA the MRA (aorta and runoff vessels) matched that results would have resulted in the optimal opera- from the CA only 41% of the time. Similarly, Quinn tive plan. et al.10 reported that femoral MRA could replace CA Patients. A total of 53 extremities in 49 patients only 57% of the time. were prospectively enrolled in the study from the Critical analysis of these respective series empha- Gainesville Veterans Administration Hospital (49 ex- size several limitations in the current application of tremities) and the Shands Hospital at the University MRA for patients with peripheral vascular occlusive of Florida (four extremities). During the study pe- disease. First, the accuracy and thus the clinical utility riod, a total of 158 infrageniculate revascularization of MRA may vary with the anatomic level (infrapop- procedures (study extremities, 53 of 158 [34%]) liteal > femoropopliteal > aortoiliac). Second, there were performed at the two study institutions (VA, is a significant leaming curve associated with the 68; University, 90). Scheduling conflicts between generation, interpretation, and äpplication of the the CA and the MRA accounted for the primary MRA images, sa~ and thus the findings from these reason that patients were not enrolled in the study seminal series may be restricted to select centers of because the magnetic resonance scanner was only excellence.~,7,8 Lastly, the MRA technique has been available during the late evening hours. The patient validated primarily by comparison with preoperative demographics reflect the secondary and tertiary clin- CA, which may be inappropriate in light of the ical practices at the Veterans Administration and lmown limitations of CA to visualize the complete University hospitals, respectively (Table I). Notably, distal vasculature in the presence ofmultilevel occlu- the majority of the patients were male and diabetic, sive disease? ,1°,i2,13 and a significant portion had undergone previous This study was designed to determine whether ipsilateral lower extremity revascularization proce- infrageniculate MRA provides sufficient visualization dures. Rest pain and tissue loss (grade II and III JOURNAL OF VASCULARSURGERY Volume 2ö, Number3 Huber et al. 417 chronic ischemia 14) were the operative indications in Table I. Patient demographics (n = 5 3) 94% of the cases. Age (yr) 68 -4- 10 The distal bypass targets for revascularization Sex (male) 96% were selected based on standard principles.
Recommended publications
  • Management of Acute Limb Ischemia in the Emergency Department
    edicine: O M p y e c n n A e c g c r e e s Diaconu, Emerg Med (Los Angel) 2015, 5:6 s m E Emergency Medicine: Open Access DOI: 10.4172/2165-7548.1000E139 ISSN: 2165-7548 Editorial Open Access Management of Acute Limb Ischemia in the Emergency Department Camelia C Diaconu* University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila”, Clinical Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, Romania *Corresponding author:Camelia C Diaconu, MD, Ph.D, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila”, Clinical Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, Romania, E- mail: [email protected] Received date: October 19, 2015; Accepted date: October 23, 2015; Published date: October 30, 2015 Copyright: © 2015 Diaconu CC. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Editorial lab, under local anesthesia, in patients with Rutherford IIa ischemia. Patients with Rutherford IIb ischemia need immediate surgical Acute limb ischemia (ALI) is an emergency condition caused by the revascularization. The endovascular interventions have the best results sudden occlusion of an artery. The tissue perfusion is compromised in the femuro-popliteal segment and in the thrombosed vascular grafts and the viability of the limb is threatened. The etiology of acute limb or thrombosed stents (compared to thrombosed native arteries). ischemia may be acute thrombosis, an embolic event or trauma. Catheter-directed thrombolysis is a technique that uses thrombolytic Sometimes, it appears when thrombosis occurs on a pre-existing agents (plasminogen activators).
    [Show full text]
  • Percutaneous Revascularization of the Lower Extremities in Adults Table of Contents Related Coverage Resources
    Medical Coverage Policy Effective Date ............................................. 3/15/2021 Next Review Date ....................................... 3/15/2022 Coverage Policy Number .................................. 0537 Percutaneous Revascularization of the Lower Extremities in Adults Table of Contents Related Coverage Resources Overview.............................................................. 1 Venous Angioplasty and/or Stent Placement in Adults Coverage Policy .................................................. 1 General Background ........................................... 2 Medicare Coverage Determinations .................. 17 Coding/Billing Information ................................. 17 References ........................................................ 19 INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE The following Coverage Policy applies to health benefit plans administered by Cigna Companies. Certain Cigna Companies and/or lines of business only provide utilization review services to clients and do not make coverage determinations. References to standard benefit plan language and coverage determinations do not apply to those clients. Coverage Policies are intended to provide guidance in interpreting certain standard benefit plans administered by Cigna Companies. Please note, the terms of a customer’s particular benefit plan document [Group Service Agreement, Evidence of Coverage, Certificate of Coverage, Summary Plan Description (SPD) or similar plan document] may differ significantly from the standard benefit plans upon which these Coverage
    [Show full text]
  • Choosing the Correct Therapeutic Option for Acute Limb Ischemia
    REVIEW Choosing the correct therapeutic option for acute limb ischemia Acute limb ischemia (ALI) occurs due to abrupt interruption of arterial flow to an extremity, which may lead to loss of limb or life. ALI is typically caused by either a thrombotic or embolic arterial occlusion. Management strategies, which may not be mutually exclusive, include anticoagulation and observation, catheter-directed thrombolysis and/or surgical thrombectomy. The therapeutic choice depends on the patient functional status, severity of ischemia and time required for treatment. A logical approach to the evaluation and management of patients with ALI is presented in this article. 1 KEYWORDS: acute limb ischemia n arterial embolus n arterial thrombosis Jeffrey A Goldstein & n catheter‑directed thrombolysis n limb salvage n peripheral arterial disease Gregory Mishkel†1 n thrombectomy n thrombolysis 1Prairie Cardiovascular Consultants, PO Box 19420, Springfield, IL 62794-9420, USA Present day cardiology has evolved from exclu- disease (PAD) may eventually develop ALI †Author for correspondence: sively directing the cardiologic health of patients, [3]. The majority of ALI cases (85%) are due Tel.: +1 217 788 0708 Fax: +1 217 788 8794 to additionally managing their vascular health. to in situ thrombosis, with the remaining 15% [email protected] Increasingly, both general and particularly inter- of cases due to embolic arterial occlusion. The ventional cardiologists are called upon to man- vast majority of emboli, upwards of 90%, are age the care of the patients in their practice when cardiac in etiology [6] and are usually due to they present with acute vascular emergencies. either atrial fibrillation or acute myocardial inf- Unfortunately, subsequent to their subspecialty arction.
    [Show full text]
  • Peripheral Angioplasty – Revascularization: Femoral/Popliteal Artery(S)
    Surgical Services: Peripheral Angioplasty – Revascularization: Femoral/Popliteal Artery(s) POLICY INITIATED: 06/30/2019 MOST RECENT REVIEW: 06/30/2019 POLICY # HH-5675 Overview Statement The purpose of these clinical guidelines is to assist healthcare professionals in selecting the medical service that may be appropriate and supported by evidence to improve patient outcomes. These clinical guidelines neither preempt clinical judgment of trained professionals nor advise anyone on how to practice medicine. The healthcare professionals are responsible for all clinical decisions based on their assessment. These clinical guidelines do not provide authorization, certification, explanation of benefits, or guarantee of payment, nor do they substitute for, or constitute, medical advice. Federal and State law, as well as member benefit contract language, including definitions and specific contract provisions/exclusions, take precedence over clinical guidelines and must be considered first when determining eligibility for coverage. All final determinations on coverage and payment are the responsibility of the health plan. Nothing contained within this document can be interpreted to mean otherwise. Medical information is constantly evolving, and HealthHelp reserves the right to review and update these clinical guidelines periodically. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, or otherwise, without permission from HealthHelp. All trademarks,
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Value of Pelvic and Penile Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Preoperative Evaluation of Penile Revascularization
    International Journal of Impotence Research (1999) 11, 83±86 ß 1999 Stockton Press All rights reserved 0955-9930/99 $12.00 http://www.stockton-press.co.uk/ijir Clinical value of pelvic and penile magnetic resonance angiography in preoperative evaluation of penile revascularization H John*1, GM Kacl2, K Lehmann1, JF Debatin2 and D Hauri1 1Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland and 2Department of Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland Penile angiography is invasive, costly and requires postinterventional surveillance. The aim of this pilot study was to determine whether three dimensional magnetic resonance (3D-MR)- angiography may replace conventional penile angiography in preoperative planning of penile revascularization. Twelve patients with a mean age of 39 (21 ± 59) y were evaluated. All patients underwent evaluation with intracavernous pharmacotesting, color Doppler sonography (CDS), digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and pelvic MR-angiography with gadolinium diethylene- triaminepentaacetic acid (Gd-Dota) 0.2 ± 0.3 mmol=kg body weight. MR-angiography demonstrated the anatomy of the internal iliac arteries in 9 out of 12 patients. Intrapenile vessels were visible in 7 out of 12 patients. In comparison DSA provided complete visualization of all pelvic and penile vessels. Relevant arterial obstruction was found in 10 out of 12 patients. CDS revealed a mean maximal arterial ¯ow of 27 (22 ± 40) cm=s and showed in accordance to angiography arterial insuf®ency in 10 out of 12 cases. Indication for revascularization could have been based on MR- angiography alone in only one patient. Therefore, selective penile angiography remains the `gold standard' for preoperative planning of revascularization procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • Management of Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Revascularization
    ACCF/AHA Pocket Guideline Management of Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Revascularization November 2011 Adapted from the 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and the 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery (Developed in Collaboration With the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons) © 2011 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association, Inc. The following material was adapted from the 2011 ACCF/AHA/ SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.007; and the 2011 ACCF/ AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.009. This pocket guideline is available on the World Wide Web sites of the American College of Cardiology (www.cardiosource.org) and the American Heart Association (my.americanheart.org). For copies of this document, please contact Elsevier Inc. Reprint Department, e-mail: [email protected]; phone: 212-633-3813; fax: 212-633-3820. Permissions: Multiple copies, modification, alteration, enhancement, and/or distribution of this document are not permitted without the express permission of the American College of Cardiology Foundation. Please contact Elsevier’s permission department at [email protected]. Contents 1. Introduction .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Acute Limb Ischemia
    Acute Limb Ischemia R. J. Guzman M. J. Osgood 10/7/11 Outline • Etiologies • Classification • Presentation • Workup/diagnosis • Management • Outcomes Etiologies • Embolic • Thrombotic • Bypass Graft Occlusion • Trauma • Iatrogenic • Other – Popliteal entrapment syndrome – Popliteal aneurysm Embolic Sources • Cardiac – Atrial – Ventricular - mural thrombus – Paradoxical – Endocarditis – Cardiac tumor (atrial myxoma) • Noncardiac – Atheroembolism – Aortic mural thrombus Embolism • Emboli usually lodge at arterial bifurcations • Most common locations: – Common femoral artery – Popliteal artery • Embolic ischemia is usually poorly tolerated because it often occurs in non-diseased peripheral arteries without established collaterals Acute popliteal embolism in patient without established collaterals Embolism • Embolic ischemia is progressive because thrombus propagates proximal and distal to the embolus Embolism • Embolic ischemia is progressive because thrombus propagates proximal and distal to the embolus Thrombotic Sources • Atherosclerotic obstruction • Hypercoagulable states • Aortic or arterial dissection Atherosclerotic obstruction • Acute thrombosis of a narrowed, atherosclerotic peripheral artery • Usually better tolerated because involved vessel has well-developed collaterals • May be asymptomatic or present as acute claudication or rest pain • May result from plaque disruption or from global reduction in cardiac output in patients with atherosclerotic burden Hypercoagulability • Inherited and acquired thrombophilias • Low arterial
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Summary: Clinical Use of Eptfe Pediatric Shunts
    Literature Summary: Clinical Use of ePTFE Pediatric Shunts P E R F O R M A N C E through experience Pediatric shunts are small diameter (3 – 6 mm) vascular connections (native vessels or synthetic vascular grafts) between systemic and pulmonary circulations. The shunts provide additional blood flow to the lungs as a palliative procedure in patients with cyanotic congenital heart disease (CCHD). Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) vascular grafts are routinely used as pediatric shunts due to their superior performance and ease of use compared to native vessels. As surgical technique and post-operative care has improved, pediatric cardiac surgeons are palliating and repairing increasingly complex lesions which, not long ago, were considered uniformly fatal conditions. The alternatives for these infants are limited. Complications associated with the surgical procedures and the use of prosthetic shunts in these complex defects are multivariate and have not been completely eliminated. These complications, including shunt thrombosis, are experienced by all pediatric cardiac surgeons at all hospitals throughout the world. Although the use of ePTFE shunts is not without complications, to date it is reported in the literature as the best surgical strategy available. PALLIATIVE PEDIATRIC SHUNT PROCEDURES 1980s to 2000, the performance of CBTS (native vessels) and MBTS (ePTFE grafts) were evaluated. In a comparative study of Systemic-to-pulmonary artery shunts are palliative procedures 12 CBTS and 27 MBTS, combined early and late shunt failure performed in the neonatal period for patients with severe CCHD was 33% for CBTS and 41% for MBTS 24. One shunt related death associated with diminished or absent pulmonary blood flow.
    [Show full text]
  • Icd-9-Cm (2010)
    ICD-9-CM (2010) PROCEDURE CODE LONG DESCRIPTION SHORT DESCRIPTION 0001 Therapeutic ultrasound of vessels of head and neck Ther ult head & neck ves 0002 Therapeutic ultrasound of heart Ther ultrasound of heart 0003 Therapeutic ultrasound of peripheral vascular vessels Ther ult peripheral ves 0009 Other therapeutic ultrasound Other therapeutic ultsnd 0010 Implantation of chemotherapeutic agent Implant chemothera agent 0011 Infusion of drotrecogin alfa (activated) Infus drotrecogin alfa 0012 Administration of inhaled nitric oxide Adm inhal nitric oxide 0013 Injection or infusion of nesiritide Inject/infus nesiritide 0014 Injection or infusion of oxazolidinone class of antibiotics Injection oxazolidinone 0015 High-dose infusion interleukin-2 [IL-2] High-dose infusion IL-2 0016 Pressurized treatment of venous bypass graft [conduit] with pharmaceutical substance Pressurized treat graft 0017 Infusion of vasopressor agent Infusion of vasopressor 0018 Infusion of immunosuppressive antibody therapy Infus immunosup antibody 0019 Disruption of blood brain barrier via infusion [BBBD] BBBD via infusion 0021 Intravascular imaging of extracranial cerebral vessels IVUS extracran cereb ves 0022 Intravascular imaging of intrathoracic vessels IVUS intrathoracic ves 0023 Intravascular imaging of peripheral vessels IVUS peripheral vessels 0024 Intravascular imaging of coronary vessels IVUS coronary vessels 0025 Intravascular imaging of renal vessels IVUS renal vessels 0028 Intravascular imaging, other specified vessel(s) Intravascul imaging NEC 0029 Intravascular
    [Show full text]
  • Final Addenda Fy 1999 Icd-9-Cm Volume 3, Procedures
    FINAL ADDENDA FY 1999 ICD-9-CM VOLUME 3, PROCEDURES Tabular List 36 Operations of vessels of heart Add code also Code also any injection or infusion of platelet inhibitor (99.20) 36.04 Intracoronary artery thrombolytic infusion Revise exclusion term Excludes: infusion of platelet inhibitor (99.20) infusion of thrombolytic agent (99.10) New category 36.3 Other heart revascularization Delete inclusion term Abrasion of epicardium Delete inclusion term Cardio-omentopexy Delete inclusion term Intrapericardial poudrage Delete inclusion term Myocardial graft: Delete inclusion term mediastinal fat Delete inclusion term omentum Delete inclusion term pectoral muscles New code 36.31 Open chest transmyocardial revascularization New code 36.32 Other transmyocardial revascularization Percutaneous transmyocardial revascularization Thoracoscopic transmyocardial revascularization New code 36.39 Other heart revascularization Abrasion of epicardium Cardio-omentopexy Intrapericardial poudrage Myocardial graft: mediastinal fat omentum pectoral muscles 37 Other operations on heart and pericardium Add code also Code also any injection or infusion of platelet inhibitor (99.20) 37.32 Excision of aneurysm of heart Add inclusion term Repair of aneurysm of heart New code 37.67 Implantation of cardiomyostimulation system Note: Two-step open procedure consisting of transfer of one end of the latissimus dorsi muscle; wrapping it around the heart; rib resection; implantation of epicardial cardiac pacing leads into the right ventricle; tunneling and pocket creation for
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Extremity Invasive Diagnostic and Endovascular Procedures
    UnitedHealthcare® Commercial Medical Policy Lower Extremity Invasive Diagnostic and Endovascular Procedures Policy Number: 2021T0602F Effective Date: July 1, 2021 Instructions for Use Table of Contents Page Related Commercial Policies Coverage Rationale ........................................................................... 1 • Pneumatic Compression Devices Documentation Requirements......................................................... 2 • Surgical and Ablative Procedures for Venous Definitions ........................................................................................... 3 Insufficiency and Varicose Veins Applicable Codes .............................................................................. 4 Description of Services ..................................................................... 5 Community Plan Policy Clinical Evidence ............................................................................... 5 • Lower Extremity Invasive Diagnostic and U.S. Food and Drug Administration ................................................ 7 Endovascular Procedures References ......................................................................................... 8 Medicare Advantage Coverage Summary Policy History/Revision Information................................................ 9 • Instructions for Use ........................................................................... 9 Cardiovascular Diagnostic Procedures Coverage Rationale Note: This policy does not apply to upper extremities. Diagnosis Lower extremity
    [Show full text]
  • Myocardial Revascularization Surgery with Regional Anesthesia Without an Endotracheal Tube in Conscious Patients
    Arq Bras Cardiol OriginalSouto Article et al 2002; 79: 297-301. Myocardial revascularization surgery in conscious patients Myocardial Revascularization Surgery with Regional Anesthesia Without an Endotracheal Tube in Conscious Patients Gladyston Luiz Lima Souto, Celme da Silva Caetano Júnior, Ary Getúlio de Paula Filho, Marco Antonio Teixeira, Márcio Roberto Moraes de Carvalho, Antonio Carlos Botelho da Silva Itaperuna, RJ - Brazil Objective - To report initial experience with myocar- The development of coronary artery bypass graft sur- dial revascularization surgery (MRS) performed on pa- gery (CABG) has progressed throughout practically all of tients who were totally awake and without an endotra- the twentieth century, with intervals of inactivity and pro- cheal tube. gress. Alex Carrel 1, in 1910, reported the first experimental aorta-coronary graft performed, using a segment of the caro- Methods - Between January 1994 and May 2001, tid artery to connect the coronary artery to the descending 272 patients underwent MRS without extracorporeal aorta. At that time, the pneumothorax created was a serious circulation. In 24, the operations were performed without problem. Murray et al 2 developed a large number of anasto- the use of an endotracheal tube and with the patients to- moses between the coronary arteries and the systemic arte- tally awake and breathing normally. The age ranged from ries, including the internal thoracic arteries. 51-75 years with the predominant male sex. Epidural tho- The experimental work of suturing with instruments racic administratios of the anesthesia was performed. began in Russia. Kahn et al 3 performed coronary anastomo- Surgery was performed through a habitual anterolateral ses in calves with a Russian-American stapler and had pro- thoracotomy.
    [Show full text]