DOCSLIB.ORG

Modernise Or Decline

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Modernise Or Decline TSO Publication_Bookshop:TSO Publication_Bookshop 29/10/07 11:51 Page 1 Cm 7529 Cm Smith R Ian | Hutton Deirdre Dame | CBE Hooper Richard sector services postal UK the of review independent An £26.60 2008 December 16 Kingdom. United the in service postal the universal maintain to Policies decline or Modernise TSO Publication Bookshop Updated 12.07.07 Modernise or decline Policies to maintain the universal postal service in the United Kingdom. 16 December 2008 Published by TSO (The Stationery Office) and available from: Online An independent review of the UK postal services sector www.tsoshop.co.uk Richard Hooper CBE | Dame Deirdre Hutton | Ian R Smith Mail, Telephone, Fax & E-mail TSO PO Box 29, Norwich NR3 1GN Telephone orders/General enquiries: 0870 600 5522 Order through the Parliamentary Hotline Lo-call 0845 7 023474 Fax orders: 0870 600 5533 Email: [email protected] Textphone: 0870 240 3701 TSO Shops 16 Arthur Street, Belfast BT1 4GD 028 9023 8451 Fax 028 9023 5401 71 Lothian Road, Edinburgh EH3 9AZ 0870 606 5566 Fax 0870 606 5588 BARCODE Cm 7529 £26.60 The Parliamentary Bookshop 12 Bridge Street, Parliament Square London SW1A 2JX TSO@Blackwell and other Accredited Agents Modernise or decline Policies to maintain the universal postal service in the United Kingdom. 16 December 2008 An independent review of the UK postal services sector Richard Hooper CBE | Dame Deirdre Hutton | Ian R Smith Cm 7529 £26.60 © Crown Copyright 2008 The text in this document (excluding the Royal Arms and other departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context.The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the document specified. Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. For any other use of this material please write to Office of Public Sector Information, Information Policy Team, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU or e-mail: [email protected] ISBN:9780101752923 Contents Acknowledgements 4 Headlines 6 Executive summary 8 Introduction 18 PART 1: SOME BASIC FACTS 22 A brief guide to the postal service 23 Not the Post Office 24 Who uses postal services? 24 Definition of the postal market 25 The letters process 27 The introduction of competition 28 PART 2: THE ISSUES 30 Post matters 31 What is the universal service? 32 What difference does it make? 32 Public opinion 32 Residential consumers 35 Small and medium-sized enterprises 36 Large businesses 37 The impact of liberalisation 38 The market has changed 39 The digital revolution 40 Cyclical change 41 Structural change 41 Challenges and opportunities 42 A positive future 44 Royal Mail faces severe difficulties 47 The significance of Royal Mail 48 The challenge posed by structural decline 48 Royal Mail’s ability to respond to market decline 49 Inefficiency 49 Pension deficit 54 Pricing 55 Labour relations 56 Relationship with the regulator 58 Royal Mail’s financial position 58 The universal service is under threat 60 PART 3: THE CHOICE 62 Modernise or decline? 63 The status quo is untenable 64 Short-term measures 66 2 2 A compensation fund 66 Degrading the universal service 67 Modernisation – in principle 67 PART 4: THE SOLUTION 70 Modernising Royal Mail 71 Modernisation in practice 72 What does Royal Mail need to modernise? 73 Commercial confidence 74 Access to capital 77 Access to corporate experience 77 Meeting these requirements together 79 Partnership 79 Post Office Ltd 82 Pensions 83 A new approach 84 Changes to the regulatory regime 87 A new regulator for a changing market 88 The role of regulation 90 Limitations on the role of regulation 90 The regulator’s duties 91 Regulatory tools 91 Formal market analysis 91 Regulatory powers 92 Cost transparency 93 RPI-X and promoting efficiency 94 A risk-based approach to regulation 95 Benefits of competition for the universal service 95 Impact of competition on Royal Mail’s revenues 95 Competition and the universal service constraint 95 The regulatory framework 97 The downstream access regime 97 The potential for deregulation 100 Value added tax 100 Shared responsibility but clear accountability 102 From policy to practice 104 Sustaining the universal service 104 PART 5: ANNEXES 106 About the report List of figures 107 Glossary of technical terms 109 Evidence to the review Summary of written submissions 115 End-to-end competition 155 Bibliography 157 About the review Terms of reference 162 Members of the panel 163 3 3 Acknowledgements We set out at the beginning of this independent review to engage a wide range of stakeholders with an interest in the future of the postal service. Our list included consumers and their representatives, postal companies, trade unions, political parties, government departments, the devolved administrations and regulators. We are immensely grateful for the countless hours which so many have given to answering our questions and explaining their respective points of view. Their comments, evidence and ideas are the foundations of this report. Thanks go to the following organisations for their written submissions to the review: Age Concern, Amazon, Citipost, Commission for Equality and Human Rights, Communication Workers Union, Direct Marketing Association, DX Group, E.ON UK, Federation of Small Businesses, H Bauer Publishing, Haymarket Publishing, Home Delivery Network Ltd, HSBC, IMRG, Institute of Directors, IPC Media, Lloyds TSB, Lovefilm, Mail Competition Forum, Mail Order Traders Association, Mail Users Association, MBNA, Merrill Lynch, National Federation of SubPostmasters, Neopost, Nordic Enterprise Trust, People Post, Periodical Publishers Association, Pitney Bowes, Postcomm, Postwatch, Redwood Publishing, Reed Business Information, Royal Bank of Scotland, Royal Mail, Royal Mail Pension Trustees, Scottish National Party, The Economist, TNT Post, UK Mail, UNITE, UPS, Williams Lea. We are also grateful to those who submitted evidence in their capacity as constituency MPs or as individuals. We greatly appreciate the time which many individuals and organisations took to discuss their experiences and analysis of the UK postal service with the panel and to present their policy proposals. We benefited from numerous meetings with Allan Leighton, Margaret Prosser, Adam Crozier, Alan Cook, Mark Higson, Ian Duncan, Alex Smith, Sue Whalley, Mike Prince, Andy McPhie and their teams at Royal Mail; Billy Hayes, Dave Ward, Jeremy Baugh and members of the postal committee at the Communication Workers Union; Commissioners, Nigel Stapleton, Sarah Chambers, Tim Brown and their colleagues at Postcomm; Millie Banerjee, Howard Webber and Ian Leigh at Postwatch; David Currie, Ed Richards and Peter Culham at Ofcom; Guy Buswell and Ian Paterson, Business Post; Nick Wells and Angus Russell, TNT Post, UK; John Coghlan, James Greenbury and their colleagues at DX Mail; Paul Reuter and Brian Scott at UNITE; Jane Newell and Gerry Degaute, Royal Mail Pension Trustees; and Richard Bradley and Phil Burns at Frontier Economics. Particular thanks go to Professor Martin Cave, Director of the Centre for Management under Regulation at Warwick Business School, for his advice on regulatory issues; and to Adrian King at Strategia for his international comparisons. We learned a great deal from visiting postal companies in the UK and overseas and are grateful for the time taken by people in all parts of the postal service to talk so openly about their work. Thanks go to the staff at the Royal Mail Centre at Greenford, the Princess Royal Distribution Centre, Northolt Delivery Office and East Finchley Delivery Office; to Harry Koorstra and his team at TNT Post, Amsterdam; John-Paul Forceville and his colleagues at La Poste, Paris; to John Allen, Chief Finance Officer, and his team at Deutsche Post, Bonn; Johnny Thijs, Chief Executive, De Post – La Poste, Brussels; Helge Israelsen, Chief Executive, Post Danmark, Copenhagen; Mary-Ann Gibbons at United States Postal Service in Washington DC; and to Dan G Blair, Chairman of the US Postal Regulatory Commission. 4 4 Many thanks also go to: Alan Alexander, Postwatch Scotland; Eric Austin, Onepost; David Barton, Royal Bank of Scotland; Simon Campbell, Via Post; Bill Cockburn; Graham Corbett; Mike Critelli and Tim Walsh, Pitney Bowes; Peter Davies, Lansdowne Partners; Lord Dearing; Steve Gill, Hewlett Packard; Richard Gillingwater, Cass Business School; Alan Halfacre, Mail Users Association; Paul Hatch, IPC Media; Professor Dieter Helm, New College, Oxford; Philip Hemard, Amazon; Chris Hemmings, Price Waterhouse Coopers; John Hughes, Regional Mail Services; James Kelly, Direct Marketing Association; Nicola King, Rothschild; Robert Langton; Ian Locks and Pru Jones, Periodical Publishers Association; Peter Luff MP (BERR Select Committee, House of Commons); Adam Mantzos, Brockley Consulting; Sir Callum McCarthy, Financial Services Authority; Ken McFarlane, Deloitte; Stuart McKinnon and Clive Davenport, Federation of Small Businesses; George Osborne MP, Alan Duncan MP and John Whittingdale MP, Conservative Party; Jana Osbourn, Women’s Institute; Jonathan Powell and his team, Morgan Stanley; Charles Reed, Reed Associates; David Sibbick, Mail Competition Forum; Neil Simpson, Publicis; Douglas Sinclair, Scottish Consumer Council; Mark Sitiver, DHL Global; Martin Stanley; Tim Stone, KPMG; Ben Story and Charlie Foreman, Deutsche Bank; Sarah Teather MP and John Thurso MP, Liberal Democrats; George
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Royal Mail Annual Report
    Royal Mail plc Royal Mail plc Annual Report and Financial Statements Royal Mail plc 2014-15 Annual Report FinancialAnnual Statements and 2014-15 Strategic report Governance Financial statements Other information Strategic report Who we are 02 Financial and operating performance highlights 04 Chairman’s statement 05 Chief Executive Officer’s review 07 Market overview 12 Our business model 14 Our strategy 16 Key performance indicators 18 UK Parcels, International & Letters (UKPIL) 21 General Logistics Systems (GLS) 23 Financial review 24 Business risks 31 Corporate Responsibility 36 Governance Chairman’s introduction to Corporate Governance 41 Board of Directors 43 Statement of Corporate Governance 47 Chief Executive’s Committee 58 Directors’ Report 60 Directors’ remuneration report 64 Financial statements Consolidated income statement 77 Consolidated statement of comprehensive income 78 Consolidated statement of cash flows 79 Consolidated balance sheet 80 Consolidated statement of changes in equity 81 Notes to the consolidated financial statements 82 Significant accounting policies 131 Group five year summary (unaudited) 140 Statement of Directors’ responsibilities in respect of 142 Information key the Group financial statements Independent Auditor’s Report to the members of 143 Royal Mail plc Case studies Royal Mail plc – parent Company financial statements 146 This icon is used throughout the document to indicate Other information reporting against a key performance indicator (KPI) Shareholder information 151 Forward-looking statements 152 Annual Report and Financial Statements 2014-15 Who we are Royal Mail is the UK’s pre-eminent delivery company, connecting people, customers and businesses. As the UK’s sole designated Universal Service Provider1, we are proud to deliver a ‘one-price-goes-anywhere’ service on a range of letters and parcels to more than 29 million addresses, across the UK, six-days-a-week.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019-20
    Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019-20 and Financial Statements Annual Report ANNUAL REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2019-20 Royal Mail plc 1 Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019–20 CONTENTS Strategic Report Financial Statements Report Strategic 02 Overview 159 Independent auditor’s report 04 Who we are 166 Consolidated income statement 06 Financial and operational highlights 2019-20 167 Consolidated statement 15 Interim Executive Chair’s statement of comprehensive income 18 Delivering throughout the COVID-19 pandemic 168 Consolidated balance sheet 19 Business review 2019-20 170 Consolidated statement of changes in equity Corporate Governance Corporate 26 Market overview 171 Consolidated statement of cash flows 28 Business model 173 Notes to the consolidated financial statements 30 Measuring our performance 233 Significant accounting policies 32 Financial review 247 Royal Mail plc – Parent Company financial statements 62 Principal risks and uncertainties 73 Viability statement Shareholder Information Financial Statements 74 Corporate responsibility 250 Group five year summary (unaudited) 86 Non-financial information statement 252 Shareholder information 253 Forward-looking statements Corporate Governance 88 Chair’s introduction 90 Group Board of Directors 92 Executive Board – Royal Mail Information Shareholder 94 Governance structure 96 Board in action 100 Board composition and diversity 101 Reporting against the 2018 Corporate Governance Code 102 Board induction programme 103 Annual evaluation of Board performance and effectiveness 104 Engaging with our stakeholders 110 The Board’s considerations to our stakeholders during the COVID-19 pandemic 112 Employee engagement 114 Nomination Committee 117 Audit and Risk Committee 126 Corporate Responsibility Committee 128 Directors’ Remuneration Report 154 Directors’ Report 157 Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities 2 Strategic Report OVERVIEW ROYAL MAIL (UKPIL) Our UK business has faced significant challenges for some years.
    [Show full text]
  • Important Information
    VOXI Buying online terms and conditions Important information Here’s what you need to know when you buy anything on the VOXI website. Date: 09 / 08 / 2021 Your agreement with us Version 1.2 By ordering from us, you agree you’ve read and accepted the following terms: • Theses buying online terms • If you’re purchasing a VOXI plan, the VOXI terms and conditions • The terms related to the use of this site Your status If you’re an individual who’s placing an order, you must be a resident in the UK, to purchase any products or services from us. Your order When you order products and services from this site, we treat this as an offer from you to purchase such products and services. We may refuse to accept such orders for any number of reasons - such as a failure to meet credit check criteria, unavailability of products or services, product or pricing errors. On receipt of your order we’ll send you an email describing the products and services you’ve ordered. These communications confirm we’ve received your order, but don’t represent any acceptance of your offer to purchase products or services from us. We’re not legally obliged to provide the products and services to you during the offer process (before the contract is completed). The contract between you and us will only be completed when we dispatch the products to you. Any products or services on the same order which haven’t been dispatched to you don’t form part of that contract.
    [Show full text]
  • Openreach Limited1
    Promoting competition and investment in fibre networks: Wholesale Fixed Telecoms Market Review 2021-2026 NON CONFIDENTIAL VERSION 15 May 2020 Foreword This response is provided by Openreach Limited1. Openreach is a wholesale network provider. We support more than 600 Communications Providers (CPs) to connect the 30 million UK homes and business to their networks. We sell our products and services to CPs so they can add their own products and provide their customers with bundled landline, mobile, broadband, TV and data services. Our services are available to everybody and our products have the same prices, terms and conditions, no matter who buys them. 1 Openreach Limited is a wholly owned subsidiary of BT Group Plc. 2 Contents Section 1 Executive Summary 4 Section 2 Market definition and assessing market power 15 Section 3 Pricing of WLA services 30 Section 4 Regulation of geographic discounts and other commercial terms 38 Section 5 Copper retirement 63 Section 6 Duct & Pole Access 69 Section 7 Leased Lines & Dark Fibre Access 114 Section 8 Quality of Service 158 Section 9 Pricing Remedies 227 3 1. Executive Summary Key points 1.1 Openreach is making this response at an unprecedented time as the country focuses on dealing with the challenges posed by COVID-19. Keeping the Nation’s communications network going has never been more important and our current focus is on keeping the UK connected and doing the essential work that is required to maintain and enhance our network. We have responded to this consultation as fully as possible given the current circumstances but would note that the full impact of COVID-19 and the time it will take to fully recovery cannot yet be forecast with any certainty.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Mail Plc – Annual Report and Financial Statements 2015-16
    Royal Mail plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2015-16 Celebrating 500 Years of Royal Mail Royal Mail has a rich and varied history, characterised by a tradition of service and innovation spanning 500 years. For five centuries, our postal network has been connecting families and friends, powering business and driving innovation across the country. In 1516, Henry VIII knighted Brian Tuke, the first Master of the Posts. This act was the catalyst for the creation of the Royal Mail postal service, as we know it today. Tuke had the influence and authority to establish key post towns across the country and set up a formal postal network. Since its royal beginnings, the postal service has continued to deliver the nation’s mail for 500 years, under 21 different monarchs and through two World Wars, employing hundreds of thousands of people along the way. To mark this momentous anniversary, Royal Mail has launched a special website featuring the people, objects and events that played a key role in the development of the world’s first national postal service. Visit: www.royalmailgroup.com/500years Within the pages of this report you will find ‘then and now’ image captions showcasing how Royal Mail has evolved over the last 500 years. Strategic report | Governance | Financial statements | Other information Welcome Strategic report Who we are ....................................................................................................................... 02 Financial and operating performance highlights .........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Comment Operators at Crossroads: Market Protection Or Innovation?
    Comment Operators at crossroads: Market protection or innovation? Arnd Webera*, Daniel Scukab Published in: Telecommunications Policy, Volume 40, Issue 4, April 2016, Pages 368–377, doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2015.11.009. Permission to publish an authors’ version has kindly been granted by Elsevier B.V. a KIT (ITAS), Kaiserstraße 12, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany b Mobikyo K.K., Level 32, Shinjuku Nomura Building, 1‐26‐2 Nishi‐Shinjuku, Shinjuku‐ku, Tokyo 163‐0532, Japan Abstract Many today believe that the mobile Internet was invented by Apple in the USA with their iPhone, enabling a data‐driven Internet ecosystem to disrupt the staid voice and SMS busi‐ ness models of the telecom carriers. History, however, shows that the mobile Internet was first successfully commercialised in Japan, in 1999. Some authors such as Richard Feasey in Telecommunications Policy (Issue 6, 2015) argue that operators had been confused and un‐ prepared when the Internet emerged and introduced “walled gardens”, without Internet access. This comment article reviews in detail how the operators reacted when the fixed, and later the mobile Internet spread; some introduced walled gardens, some opened it for the “unofficial” content on the Internet. The article concludes that most large European tel‐ ecom and information technology companies and their investors have a tradition of risk avoidance and pursued high‐price strategies that led them to regularly fail against better and cheaper foreign products and services, not only when the wireless Internet was introduced, but also when PCs and the fixed Internet were introduced. Consequences, such as the need to enable future disruptions and boost the skills needed to master them, are presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019-20
    Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019-20 and Financial Statements Annual Report ANNUAL REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2019-20 Royal Mail plc 1 Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019–20 CONTENTS Strategic Report Financial Statements Report Strategic 02 Overview 159 Independent auditor’s report 04 Who we are 166 Consolidated income statement 06 Financial and operational highlights 2019-20 167 Consolidated statement 15 Interim Executive Chair’s statement of comprehensive income 18 Delivering throughout the COVID-19 pandemic 168 Consolidated balance sheet 19 Business review 2019-20 170 Consolidated statement of changes in equity Corporate Governance Corporate 26 Market overview 171 Consolidated statement of cash flows 28 Business model 173 Notes to the consolidated financial statements 30 Measuring our performance 233 Significant accounting policies 32 Financial review 247 Royal Mail plc – Parent Company financial statements 62 Principal risks and uncertainties 73 Viability statement Shareholder Information Financial Statements 74 Corporate responsibility 250 Group five year summary (unaudited) 86 Non-financial information statement 252 Shareholder information 253 Forward-looking statements Corporate Governance 88 Chair’s introduction 90 Group Board of Directors 92 Executive Board – Royal Mail Information Shareholder 94 Governance structure 96 Board in action 100 Board composition and diversity 101 Reporting against the 2018 Corporate Governance Code 102 Board induction programme 103 Annual evaluation of Board performance and effectiveness 104 Engaging with our stakeholders 110 The Board’s considerations to our stakeholders during the COVID-19 pandemic 112 Employee engagement 114 Nomination Committee 117 Audit and Risk Committee 126 Corporate Responsibility Committee 128 Directors’ Remuneration Report 154 Directors’ Report 157 Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities 2 Strategic Report OVERVIEW ROYAL MAIL (UKPIL) Our UK business has faced significant challenges for some years.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Meeting 2014
    Notice of Meeting 2014 This document is important and requires your immediate attention. If you are in any doubt about the action you should take, you should consult your independent financial adviser. If you have recently sold or transferred your shares in Severn Trent Plc please forward this document to your bank, stockbroker or other agent through or to whom the sale or transfer was effected for delivery to the purchaser or transferee. Dear Shareholder This year’s Annual General Meeting (the ‘Meeting’) will be held at the International Convention Centre in Birmingham on Wednesday 16 July 2014 at 11am and the formal notice of the Meeting is set out overleaf (the ‘Notice’). If you would like to vote on the Resolutions in the Notice but cannot come to the Meeting, please fill in the Form of Proxy sent to you with the Notice and return it to Equiniti (our registrar) as soon as possible. Equiniti must receive the Form of Proxy by 11am on Monday 14 July 2014. Alternatively, you can vote online at www.sharevote.co.uk If you are a registered shareholder holding shares in your own name and have not elected to receive communications in paper form by post or if you have elected to receive paper notification that shareholder communications are available to view online, I can advise you that the Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2014 is now available online at www.severntrent.com Please note that the company operates a Dividend Reinvestment Plan, which gives shareholders the option of using their dividend payments to buy more shares in Severn Trent Plc (the ‘Company’) at favourable commission rates.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal to Put Prestel Viewdata System Into Every British Home Racing for the Cosmic Flash
    _4l_O _______________________ NEWS------------N_A_T_U_R_E_V_O_L_.3_3_0_3_D_E_C_E_M_B_E_R_1_98_7 Proposal to put Prestel viewdata Racing for the system into every British home cosmic flash London to supply continuously updated informa­ Sydney BRITISH Telecom has decided to embark tion on ferry availability. Indeed, by 1981, AsTRONOMERS in Australia and New on an ambitious scheme to put its pioneer­ British Telecom had changed its market­ Zealand are rushing to complete gamma­ ing viewdata system Prestel into every ing strategy to aim at the business world ray telescopes in time to catch the ex­ telephone subscriber's household. At rather than householders. Now, of Prestel's pected arrival of gamma rays from the present. only 24,000 British households 78,000 terminals, 69 per cent are in the February supernova in the Large Magel­ have Prestel terminals, out of 18 million workplace and 31 per cent in the home. lanic Cloud. domestic telephone subscribers. It is The lack of interest of domestic users is Two new instruments are under con­ understood that British Telecom will in generally blamed on poor marketing and struction; one in the Australian desert at the first instance set up a trial, with sub­ the cost of hardware. At present, the least Woomera and the other 1,650 m up a scribers in one London telephone district expensive means of using Prestel is to buy mountain near Blenheim on New Zea­ and one district outside London being an adaptor priced at around £100 for an land's South Island. supplied with Prestel terminals for a existing television set. Although Prestel's Visually, the supernova has long passed fixed time.
    [Show full text]
  • Question 3.1: Do You Agree with Ofcom’S Proposal to Set Synchronised Charge Controls for LLU and WLR?
    NON-CONFIDENTIAL VERSION OFCOM CHARGE CONTROL REVIEW FOR LLU AND WLR SERVICES – CONSULTATION ISSUED 31 MARCH 2011 RESPONSE BY EVERYTHING EVERYWHERE LIMITED A. INTRODUCTION Everything Everywhere Limited (EE) welcomes the opportunity to respond to Ofcom’s important consultation on the next charge control review for local loop unbundling (LLU) and wholesale line rental (WLR) services, issued on 31 March 2011 (the Consultation). This Consultation is of key commercial and competitive significance for the success of EE’s Orange Home fixed voice and broadband business going forward. In this regard we note that, whilst during the course of 2011 we have been moving from a direct shared metallic path facility (SMPF) and WLR based mode of providing these retail services to providing our retail services through a wholesale arrangement with BT, [][]. The comments in this response represent the views of EE. It should be noted that the views of EE’s shareholders and those of the holding companies and ultimate parent companies may vary from these views. Those parts of this response marked with [] and highlighted in blue are confidential to EE. B. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EE’s experience of LLU regulation and market conditions in the UK as an SMPF based service provider has been a telling one. Most notably, following the initial successes of Ofcom LLU policy in stimulating SMPF based retail broadband competition, progressive changes to regulatory investment ladder have resulted in us witnessing over the last five years the market exit of a very large proportion of the SMPF “early adopters” (e.g. Tiscali, AOL, Pipex, Bulldog). In May 2011, we have also seen the total number of unbundled lines in the UK falling rather than growing for the first time in several years, from 7.62 million lines in April 2011 to 7.56 million lines in May 20111.
    [Show full text]
  • News Release ROYAL MAIL STATEMENT
    News Release 20 September2013 For immediate release ROYAL MAIL STATEMENT • Royal Mail is very disappointed that the CWU has confirmed that it is holding a national industrial action ballot of its members • An Ipsos MORI poll, commissioned by Royal Mail, reveals that 72% of British adults believe the CWU should accept Royal Mail’s pay offer and call off the plans to strike. In addition, 78% felt that the Royal Mail’s pay offer of 8.6% over three years was “very fair”or“fair”. • A ballot for industrial action does not mean there will be a strike; currently it is business as usual for Royal Mail and Parcelforce Worldwide. • Any industrial action has a direct bearing on Royal Mail’s ability to sustain good quality, long-term employment for our people • Any industrial action, or the possibility of disruption, is damaging to our customers, and our business, especially in the run up to Christmas, our busiest time • Royal Mail is still talking with the CWU to reach a new agreement and calls on the CWU to focus on these talks rather than preparing for industrial action. We wish to reach agreement as soon as possible to provide continued stability for our employees, our business and our customers • Since 2011 Royal Mail has been talking with the CWU to reach a new agreement following the three-year Business Transformation and Beyond 2010 agreement. That awarded a pay increase of 6.9% over three years, at a time when RPI was 4.1% and, public sector employees had a two-year pay freeze • Royal Mail believes its offer to its postmen and women is very fair: Pay An 8.6% increase in pay , allowance and overtime payments over three years Protections We have offered a legally-binding and enforceable contract with the CWU.
    [Show full text]
  • Openreach Limited Annual Report and Financial Statements 31 March
    Openreach Limited Annual Report and Financial Statements 31 March 2020 Registered number: 10690039 Openreach Limited Contents: Page Corporate Information 2 Strategic Report 3 Directors’ Report 6 Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities 12 Independent Auditor’s Report to the Members of Openreach Limited 13 Profit and Loss Account 16 Balance Sheet 17 Statement of Changes in Equity 18 Notes to the Financial Statements 19 1 Openreach Limited Corporate Information Directors E Astle B Barber (resigned 31 May 2020) A Barron (appointed 1 June 2020) E Benison M Davies S Lowth R McTighe C Selley Secretary J Furmston Auditor KPMG LLP 15 Canada Square, London. E14 5GL Registered Office 123 Judd Street London WC1H 9NP 2 Openreach Limited Strategic Report The directors present their strategic report for Openreach Limited (“the Company”) for the year ended 31 March 2020. Business Review Openreach Limited was set up as part of the regulatory agreement reached between British Telecommunications plc and Ofcom under the Digital Communications Review (“DCR”). During the year the Company has continued to carry out its principal activities which are to set the Openreach strategy (within British Telecommunications plc’s overall strategic framework), employ Openreach employees and to oversee and manage the performance of the Openreach Customer Facing Unit (“CFU”), a division of British Telecommunications plc on behalf of British Telecommunications plc within a framework agreed between the Company and British Telecommunications plc. British Telecommunications plc has committed to fund the costs of the services provided by the Company, initially in accordance with the Transitional Agreement contract executed on 15 December 2017 between the Company and British Telecommunications plc and subsequently in accordance with the Agency & Services Agreement which came into effect on 1 October 2018, resulting in the automatic termination of the Transitional Agreement.
    [Show full text]