Australian List of Threat Categories of Non-Indigenous Vertebrates

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Australian List of Threat Categories of Non-Indigenous Vertebrates Australian List of Threat Categories of Non-indigenous Vertebrates Environment and Invasives Committee Revised July 2018 Table of Contents Background ..................................................................................................................................................................3 Assignment to threat categories ...................................................................................................................... 4 Table 1 Assigning species to EIC Threat Categories (shaded cells relate to assignment of reptiles and amphibians to EIC Threat Categories based on an assessed establishment risk and an allocated pest risk of extreme) – adapted from Bomford 2008 and sourced from the VPC Guidelines. ..............................................6 Table 2 List of non-indigenous species present in Australia ................................................................................7 Table 3 List of non-indigenous species that have previously been recorded in Australia and have been risk assessed for a Threat Category endorsed by VPC/IPAC ................................................................................... 26 Table 4 List on non-indigenous species that have been assessed by the Australian Government (under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999) and approved fro live import with a permit but are not known to be legally kept in Australia ............................................................................................. 26 Table 5 List of non-indigenous species that have been risk assess but have not been recorded in Australian and are not considered suitable for import ...................................................................................................... 27 References .................................................................................................................................................... 28 Environment and Invasives Committee – Australian List of Threat Categories of Non- indigenous Vertebrates EIC © Commonwealth of Australia 2018 ISBN 978-0-7246-6566-2 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to: Secretariat Environment and Invasives Committee [email protected] The South Australian Government, Department of Primary Industries and Regions SA and Victorian Government, Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources collated and edited this publication for the Environment and Invasives Committee (previously the Invasive Plants and Animals Committee, and the Vertebrate Pests Committee). While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of this publication are factually correct, the South Australian and Victorian Government and members of the Committee (or the governments that the committee members represent) do not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the contents of this publication. Acknowledgements The EIC acknowledges the assistance of the University of Adelaide, Zoo and Aquarium Association, the Western Australian Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, the Victorian Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, and Biosecurity South Australia. This list is consistent with the Guidelines for the Import, Movement and Keeping of Non- indigenous Vertebrates in Australia (Department of Agriculture, Canberra 2014) Background Plants and animals suitable for live import into Australia are on the List of Specimens Taken to be Suitable for Live Import. Under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act), live specimens or reproductive material may only be imported if they are on the live import list. The list was established in accordance with section 303EB of the EPBC Act and has two parts. Part 1 comprises species exempt for the requirement for an import permit under the EPBC Act. Part 2 comprises species that require an import permit. The Department of the Environment and Energy manages applications and assessments for imports of live animals under Section 303EN of the EPBC Act. The Department of Agriculture and Water Resources administers the Import Conditions Database. The Environment and Invasives Committee List of Threat Categories of Non-indigenous Vertebrates (the EIC List) forms a record of the non-indigenous amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals that: are recorded in Australia, have been previously recorded in Australia and have been risk assessed, are suitable for live import but are not in Australia, have been risk assessed but are believed not to be present in Australia, or have been risk assessed and are not considered suitable for import (i.e. the species is not on the Commonwealth’s live import list). The EIC List does not include fish. The EIC List has been produced by the EIC and follows on from previous versions produced by the Vertebrate Pests Committee. The EIC List classifies animals into threat categories on the basis of their pest potential in line with the Vertebrate Pest Committee Guidelines for the Import Movement and Keeping of Non-Indigenous Vertebrate Animals in Australia (the VPC Guidelines; VPC 2014). Each species has been assessed for the risk it poses (SCA Technical Report Series – No 13, Commonwealth Government 1983). Where species have been subject to a specific and thorough risk assessment, i.e. the Australian Reptile and Amphibian Model and/or the Australian Bird and Mammal Model (Bomford 2008), the date the risk assessment was endorsement is listed. This list may be subject to change from time to time (with EIC approval), to reflect new introductions, changes in taxonomy of listed species or changes to threat category in accordance with a risk assessment endorsed by EIC. The list uses the following sourses as the authoritative taxonomic references: The IUCN Red List The Catalogue of Life Integrated Taxonomic Information Sysytem (ITIS) Where a species name could not be found in either of the above reference lists, a further authoratitive reference was sourced. This list is maintained by the Terrestrial Vertebrate Working Group of the EIC and should be updated on a regular basis. All changes to this list should be made in accordance with current EIC policy and must be accepted unanimously by all EIC members. The list will be reviewed and re-published by the EIC every five years. Page 3 of 28 The EIC list DOES NOT define the legal status of species under Commonwealth, State or Territory legislation. However, Commonwealth, State and Territory agencies should use this list as a reference when controlling the entry, movement and keeping of nonindigenous animals. Please contact the Commonwealth Department of the Environment and Energy for further information about importation of non-indigenous animals into Australia. Approval to keep species that have been assigned to a threat category in accordance with the VPC Guidelines will be decided by the relevant authority in the State or Territory in which the species will be kept. Please contact the relevant State or Territory authority for further information on the movement, keeping and control of animals within each jurisdiction. Note: The VPC Guidelines were developed by the former Vertebrate Pest Committee. In 2015, this committee was merged into the Invasive Pest and Animal Committee (IPAC), under which the Vertebrate Incursions Expert Group operated. In 2018, the Environment and Invasives Committee (EIC) was established, encompassing the role of the former IPAC. The EIC Terrestrial Vertebrate Working Group replaces the Vertebrate Incursions Expert Group. Assignment to Threat Categories The national Guidelines for the Import, Movement and Keeping of Non-indigenous Vertebrates in Australia (VPC Guidelines) provide a nationally consistent framework for assessing the risk posed to environmental, economic and social values, including public safety, by species of non-indigenous vertebrates. The assessment is based (where possible) on: the danger posed by an individual animal the likelihood of establishment the consequences of establishment For birds and mammals, the three risk ranks (establishment risk, pest risk and public safety risk) are calculated and used to assign species to one of four VPC Threat Categories: Extreme, Serious, Moderate or Low (see Table 1). For reptiles and amphibians, the assessed establishment risk rank is combined with an allocated extreme pest risk rank (based on the precautionary approach), resulting in the assignment of species into one of two VPC Threat Categories: Extreme, Serious. In the absence of a specific and thorough risk assessment, early assignments of species to VPC Threat Categories were on the basis of a general assessment and expert opinion. These species have now been allocated to the extreme threat category until a thorough risk assessment is undertaken using the Australian Reptile and Amphibian Model and/or the Australian Bird and Mammal Model. Some of the species which have not had a specific and thorough risk assessment in accordance with the national VPC Guidelines are established pests and/or livestock, pet and farm animals widely kept in Australia. However, following a precautionary approach
Recommended publications
  • Rodent Identification and Signs of Stowaways Key Features of UK Target Rodents
    FROM RSPB BIOSECURITY MANUAL CHAPTER 2: RODENT SURVEILLANCE & IDENTIFICATION Rodent identification and signs of stowaways Key features of UK target rodents Black rat Brown rat House mouse FROM RSPB BIOSECURITY MANUAL CHAPTER 2: RODENT SURVEILLANCE & IDENTIFICATION Identifying rodent droppings Rodent droppings can be very variable (depending on diet), including in colour, but as a guide: Brown rat Black rat House mouse -13-19mm long, -7-14mm long -4-8mm long -3-4mm thick -3-4mm thick -2mm thick -Rounded ends, one end may go to -Tapered ends -Small and thin a point (as pictured) -Often slightly curved -A bit like grains of rice -Likely to contain fur -Likely to contain fur -Strong smell of ammonia. -Often located in latrines along tracks, at feeding sites and on prominent rocks Figure 2.9 Droppings of UK invasive rodents. Images: taken from Morton & Cole 2013 Rabbit or goat droppings be mistaken for rat droppings, though they are usually more spherical (particularly rabbit) and uniform. Goat droppings may be more cylindrical but with flatter or round, rather than tapered ends. Breaking up droppings should help (wear gloves): rabbit and goat droppings just contain vegetation, whereas rat droppings are likely to contain fur and a range of food stuffs. Shrew droppings – typically 2-4mm long and 1-2mm thick, these should be smaller than rat or mouse droppings. However, evidence from St Agnes and Gugh (Isles of Scilly) shows shrew droppings can be much larger than this. They are of a sandy consistency and are largely comprised of insect remains, whereas rodent droppings generally contain a wider array of food sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Laws of Malaysia
    LAWS OF MALAYSIA ONLINE VERSION OF UPDATED TEXT OF REPRINT Act 716 WILDLIFE CONSERVATION ACT 2010 As at 1 December 2014 2 WILDLIFE CONSERVATION ACT 2010 Date of Royal Assent … … 21 October 2010 Date of publication in the Gazette … … … 4 November 2010 Latest amendment made by P.U.(A)108/2014 which came into operation on ... ... ... ... … … … … 18 April 2014 3 LAWS OF MALAYSIA Act 716 WILDLIFE CONSERVATION ACT 2010 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY Section 1. Short title and commencement 2. Application 3. Interpretation PART II APPOINTMENT OF OFFICERS, ETC. 4. Appointment of officers, etc. 5. Delegation of powers 6. Power of Minister to give directions 7. Power of the Director General to issue orders 8. Carrying and use of arms PART III LICENSING PROVISIONS Chapter 1 Requirement for licence, etc. 9. Requirement for licence 4 Laws of Malaysia ACT 716 Section 10. Requirement for permit 11. Requirement for special permit Chapter 2 Application for licence, etc. 12. Application for licence, etc. 13. Additional information or document 14. Grant of licence, etc. 15. Power to impose additional conditions and to vary or revoke conditions 16. Validity of licence, etc. 17. Carrying or displaying licence, etc. 18. Change of particulars 19. Loss of licence, etc. 20. Replacement of licence, etc. 21. Assignment of licence, etc. 22. Return of licence, etc., upon expiry 23. Suspension or revocation of licence, etc. 24. Licence, etc., to be void 25. Appeals Chapter 3 Miscellaneous 26. Hunting by means of shooting 27. No licence during close season 28. Prerequisites to operate zoo, etc. 29. Prohibition of possessing, etc., snares 30.
    [Show full text]
  • BANDICOTA INDICA, the BANDICOOT RAT 3.1 The
    CHAPTER THREE BANDICOTA INDICA, THE BANDICOOT RAT 3.1 The Living Animal 3.1.1 Zoology Rats and mice (family Muridae) are the most common and well-known rodents, not only of the fi elds, cultivated areas, gardens, and storage places but especially so of the houses. Though there are many genera and species, their general appearance is pretty the same. Rats are on average twice as large as mice (see Chapter 31). The bandicoot is the largest rat on the Indian subcontinent, with a body and head length of 30–40 cm and an equally long tail; this is twice as large as the black rat or common house rat (see section 3.1.2 below). This large size immediately distinguishes the bandicoot from other rats. Bandicoots have a robust form, a rounded head, large rounded or oval ears, and a short, broad muzzle. Their long and naked scaly tail is typical of practically all rats and mice. Bandicoots erect their piles of long hairs and grunt when excited. Bandicoots are found practically on the whole of the subcontinent from the Himalayas to Cape Comorin, including Sri Lanka, but they are not found in the deserts and the semi-arid zones of north-west India. Here, they are replaced by a related species, the short-tailed bandicoot (see section 3.1.2 below). The bandicoot is essentially parasitic on man, living in or about human dwellings. They cause a lot of damage to grounds and fl oorings because of their burrowing habits; they also dig tunnels through bricks and masonry.
    [Show full text]
  • Editorial Submitting an Article
    Journal of Natural Science Collections 2015: Volume 2 Editorial Welcome to the second Volume of the Journal The articles presented here aim to provide guid- of Natural Science Collections : a Journal for ance for working with natural science collec- you who work with natural science collections tions. If colleagues are wanting to undertake everyday. I hope that the articles in this Volume specific conservation work on areas in their prove to be interesting, and useful for all. collection, and are unsure as where to begin, please do contact one of the NatSCA commit- There are a large variety of topics covered in tee who will be able to advise. this Volume. The first article examines proto- cols for destructive sampling in natural history All the articles from Volume 1 are now available specimens, providing a nice case study and for free to view on the NatSCA website destructive sampling forms for researchers that (www.natsca.org). Please also have a look at can be adapted for your own institution. A pa- the NatSCA blog, which has more informal write per examines the fascinating natural history ups of views, book reviews and conferences displays of old and new, with surprising results. (http://naturalsciencecollections.wordpress.com/). An interesting article can assist with the mu- seum curators decision to lend specimens for I am very excited about the NatSCA 2015 con- research, where the article examines whether ference and AGM. The theme is all about how Micro-CT scanning affects DNA in specimens. we use traditional and social media to talk Conservators share their methods of cleaning a about our collections.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Environmental Assessment Evaluation of the Field Efficacy Of
    Draft Environmental Assessment Evaluation of the field efficacy of broadcast application of two rodenticides (diphacinone, chlorophacinone) to control mice (Mus musculus) in native Hawaiian conservation areas Prepared by: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Pacific Islands Fish and Wildlife Office (PIFWO), Region 1 Cooperating Agencies: USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center (NWRC), Hilo, Hawai’i; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Migratory Birds and Habitat Program, Pacific Region BACKGROUND In keeping with its mission, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is striving to recover and restore native species and their habitats in Hawai’i. To achieve this goal it is necessary to remove invasive rodents, including mice, from large geographic areas within the state. However, some of the scientific information needed to support removal of mice from the natural environment is currently lacking. Therefore, the Service, in cooperation with the USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center (NWRC) are proposing to conduct a study at the U.S. Army Garrison, Pōhakuloa Training Area, Hawai’i to determine the response of mice to different application rates of two rodenticides: diphacinone and chlorophacinone. The Service would provide the funding for the proposed project and the NWRC would conduct the proposed study. Currently, diphacinone is the only rodenticide labeled for conservation purposes in Hawai’i. The information from the study would, if warranted by results, also be used to pursue registration for a conservation label from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for chlorophacinone. Invasive1 house mice (Mus musculus) are abundant and widespread in Hawaiian ecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammals of Jordan
    © Biologiezentrum Linz/Austria; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Mammals of Jordan Z. AMR, M. ABU BAKER & L. RIFAI Abstract: A total of 78 species of mammals belonging to seven orders (Insectivora, Chiroptera, Carni- vora, Hyracoidea, Artiodactyla, Lagomorpha and Rodentia) have been recorded from Jordan. Bats and rodents represent the highest diversity of recorded species. Notes on systematics and ecology for the re- corded species were given. Key words: Mammals, Jordan, ecology, systematics, zoogeography, arid environment. Introduction In this account we list the surviving mammals of Jordan, including some reintro- The mammalian diversity of Jordan is duced species. remarkable considering its location at the meeting point of three different faunal ele- Table 1: Summary to the mammalian taxa occurring ments; the African, Oriental and Palaearc- in Jordan tic. This diversity is a combination of these Order No. of Families No. of Species elements in addition to the occurrence of Insectivora 2 5 few endemic forms. Jordan's location result- Chiroptera 8 24 ed in a huge faunal diversity compared to Carnivora 5 16 the surrounding countries. It shelters a huge Hyracoidea >1 1 assembly of mammals of different zoogeo- Artiodactyla 2 5 graphical affinities. Most remarkably, Jordan Lagomorpha 1 1 represents biogeographic boundaries for the Rodentia 7 26 extreme distribution limit of several African Total 26 78 (e.g. Procavia capensis and Rousettus aegypti- acus) and Palaearctic mammals (e. g. Eri- Order Insectivora naceus concolor, Sciurus anomalus, Apodemus Order Insectivora contains the most mystacinus, Lutra lutra and Meles meles). primitive placental mammals. A pointed snout and a small brain case characterises Our knowledge on the diversity and members of this order.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeography of Finches and Sparrows
    In: Animal Genetics ISBN: 978-1-60741-844-3 Editor: Leopold J. Rechi © 2009 Nova Science Publishers, Inc. Chapter 1 PHYLOGEOGRAPHY OF FINCHES AND SPARROWS Antonio Arnaiz-Villena*, Pablo Gomez-Prieto and Valentin Ruiz-del-Valle Department of Immunology, University Complutense, The Madrid Regional Blood Center, Madrid, Spain. ABSTRACT Fringillidae finches form a subfamily of songbirds (Passeriformes), which are presently distributed around the world. This subfamily includes canaries, goldfinches, greenfinches, rosefinches, and grosbeaks, among others. Molecular phylogenies obtained with mitochondrial DNA sequences show that these groups of finches are put together, but with some polytomies that have apparently evolved or radiated in parallel. The time of appearance on Earth of all studied groups is suggested to start after Middle Miocene Epoch, around 10 million years ago. Greenfinches (genus Carduelis) may have originated at Eurasian desert margins coming from Rhodopechys obsoleta (dessert finch) or an extinct pale plumage ancestor; it later acquired green plumage suitable for the greenfinch ecological niche, i.e.: woods. Multicolored Eurasian goldfinch (Carduelis carduelis) has a genetic extant ancestor, the green-feathered Carduelis citrinella (citril finch); this was thought to be a canary on phonotypical bases, but it is now included within goldfinches by our molecular genetics phylograms. Speciation events between citril finch and Eurasian goldfinch are related with the Mediterranean Messinian salinity crisis (5 million years ago). Linurgus olivaceus (oriole finch) is presently thriving in Equatorial Africa and was included in a separate genus (Linurgus) by itself on phenotypical bases. Our phylograms demonstrate that it is and old canary. Proposed genus Acanthis does not exist. Twite and linnet form a separate radiation from redpolls.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of the Boé Region, South-East Guinea-Bissau, Including
    Birds of the Boé region, south-east Guinea-Bissau, including the first country records of Chestnut-backed Sparrow Lark Eremopterix leucotis, Lesser Striped Swallow Cecropis abyssinica and Heuglin’s Wheatear Oenanthe heuglini João L. Guilherme Aves da região do Boé, sudeste da Guiné-Bissau, incluindo registos de três novas espécies para o país. Durante os meses de janeiro e fevereiro de 2013 foi levado a cabo um levantamento da avifauna no sector do Boé, sudeste da Guiné-Bissau. Este trabalho permitiu identificar um total de 170 espécies de aves, das quais, três constituem novos registos para o país: cotovia-pardal-de-dorso-castanho Eremopterix leucotis, andorinha-estriada-pequena Cecropis abyssinica e chasco de Heuglin Oenanthe heuglini. Vinte e três das espécies registadas encontram-se restritas ao bioma de savana Sudano-Guineense, doze são restritas ao bioma de floresta Guineo-Congolense e cinco são espécies prioritárias para a conservação. Este constitui o primeiro levantamento da avifauna desta região da Guiné-Bissau. São também apresentados registos efectuados na região por P. Wit durante 2007–13. O sector do Boé é dominado por diversos habitats de savana e alberga uma elevada diversidade de fauna e flora. Um projecto para a criação de dois parques nacionais e três corredores para a fauna está a ser implementado na região. No entanto, os actuais usos dos solos e recursos naturais constituem potenciais importantes ameaças à preservação da biodiversidade e dos serviços dos ecossistemas do sector do Boé. Summary. During an ornithological survey of the Boé region, south-east Guinea-Bissau, in January and February 2013, 170 bird species were recorded.
    [Show full text]
  • Recording Some of Breeding Birds in Mehmedan Region of Republic Yemen
    Available online a t www.pelagiaresearchlibrary.com Pelagia Research Library European Journal of Experimental Biology, 2014, 4(1):625-632 ISSN: 2248 –9215 CODEN (USA): EJEBAU Recording some of breeding birds in Mehmedan region of Republic Yemen Fadhl Adullah Nasser Balem and Mohamed Saleh Alzokary Biology Department, Aden University, Yaman _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ABSTRACT Mehmedan region is always green and there are different trees, shrubs, herbs and a lot of land which cultivated by corn, millet and other monetary plants. The site has been identified by the authors as an important Bird Area and especially for passerines breeding birds. Aim of this paper is to recording of some breeding birds.Many field visits during the year (2012) were conducted and (13) breeding bird species were recoded, these birds relating to (5) Orders, (10) Families, and (11) Genera. Key words: Breeding birds, Mehmedan, Yemen. _____________________________________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION At present time about (432) bird species were recorded in avifauna of Yemen of which (1) is endemic, (2) have been introduced by humans, and (25) are rare or accidental, (14) species are globally threatened.Mehmedan region located in southern Tehama which defined as lying south of (21 0N) along the Saudi Arabian and Yemen Red Sea lowlands and east along the Gulf of Aden to approximately (46 0E).Temperatures and humidity greatly increase southwards and rainfall decreases but the area has many permanent water courses and much subsurface water due to the considerable rub-off of rainwater from the highlands. Consequently there is much more vegetation in the wadis and there is a good deal of traditional, small scale agriculture mostly of millet, sorghum and vegetables[1].
    [Show full text]
  • Ki Natural Resources Management Board Agenda
    KI NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT BOARD AGENDA MEETING 155 to be held Friday 19 July 2019, Boardroom, 35 Dauncey St, Kingscote Verbal Report Paper 1:00 pm start CS Consent Schedule Time # Agenda Item 1:00 1 Meeting Preliminaries (15 mins) 1.1 Welcome 1.2 Apologies 1.3 Presiding Member D Miley 1 1.4 Declaration of interest by members 1.5 Acceptance of agenda and consent schedule Decision 1 1:15 2 Minutes of Previous Meeting (45 mins) 2.1 Acceptance of previous minutes Presiding Member Decision 1 2.2 Business arising from previous minutes D Miley Noting 18 2:00 3 Board Matters: for decision or discussion (90 mins) 3.1 Financial Reports J Hughes Decision 20 3.2 Risk Management J Hughes Decision 27 3.3 Legislative Compliance Review S Gullickson Decision 35 3.4 New and emerging introduced animals L Andrews Discussion 57 3.5 Retaining shacks D Miley Discussion 94 3.6 Financial Compliance Management Program J Hughes Discussion 130 3.7 Biosecurity Advisory Committee A Triggs Discussion 135 3.8 Regional Director’s report D Miley Discussion 139 3.9 Board member reports Discussion 144 4 Board Matters: Consent Schedule 4.1 Correspondence register CS Noting 145 4.2 Out-of-session approvals: D Miley CS Noting 157 CRC submission Service Level Agreement 3:30 5 Any Other Business (15 mins) 6 Board Communique 7 Next Meeting Friday 23 August at 9:30 am (TBC) 4:00 8 Closure Kangaroo Island NRM Board Meeting 1. Meeting Preliminaries Number 155 – 19 July 2019 1.3 PRESIDING MEMBER Priority For Decision RECOMMENDATIONS That the Kangaroo Island Natural Resources Management Board: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Threats to West African Biodiversity and Linkages to Wildlife Trafficking Liberia Field Assessment Report
    FORESTRY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY UNDERSTANDING THREATS TO WEST AFRICAN BIODIVERSITY AND LINKAGES TO WILDLIFE TRAFFICKING LIBERIA FIELD ASSESSMENT REPORT NOVEMBER 2018 i This document was made possible by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) through the West Africa Biodiversity and Climate Change (WA BiCC) program. The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of its authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. For more information on the West Africa Biodiversity and Climate Change program, contact: USAID/West Africa Biodiversity and Climate Change Tetra Tech 2nd Labone Link, North Labone Accra, Ghana Tel: +233(0)302 788 600 Email: www.tetratech.com/intdev Website: www.wabicc.org Stephen Kelleher Chief of Party Accra, Ghana Tel: + 233 (0) 302 788 600 Email: [email protected] Vaneska Litz Project Manager Burlington, Vermont Tel.: +1 802 495 0577 Email: [email protected] Citation: Republic of Liberia Forestry Development Authority, 2019. Understanding Threats to West African Biodiversity and Linkages to Wildlife Trafficking: Liberia Field Assessment Report. Edited by Balinga M. and Stroud A in 2019. Cover photo: Chimpanzees at the Rescue and Protection Center in Liberia. Credit: Charles Mackay ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................. 1 Acronyms .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Assessments in the B+WISER Sites
    Ecological Assessments in the B+WISER Sites (Northern Sierra Madre Natural Park, Upper Marikina-Kaliwa Forest Reserve, Bago River Watershed and Forest Reserve, Naujan Lake National Park and Subwatersheds, Mt. Kitanglad Range Natural Park and Mt. Apo Natural Park) Philippines Biodiversity & Watersheds Improved for Stronger Economy & Ecosystem Resilience (B+WISER) 23 March 2015 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Chemonics International Inc. The Biodiversity and Watersheds Improved for Stronger Economy and Ecosystem Resilience Program is funded by the USAID, Contract No. AID-492-C-13-00002 and implemented by Chemonics International in association with: Fauna and Flora International (FFI) Haribon Foundation World Agroforestry Center (ICRAF) The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. Ecological Assessments in the B+WISER Sites Philippines Biodiversity and Watersheds Improved for Stronger Economy and Ecosystem Resilience (B+WISER) Program Implemented with: Department of Environment and Natural Resources Other National Government Agencies Local Government Units and Agencies Supported by: United States Agency for International Development Contract No.: AID-492-C-13-00002 Managed by: Chemonics International Inc. in partnership with Fauna and Flora International (FFI) Haribon Foundation World Agroforestry Center (ICRAF) 23 March
    [Show full text]