DOCSLIB.ORG

Devtest: Driving Continuous Testing with Service Virtualization

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Devtest: Driving Continuous Testing with Service Virtualization EBOOK The Who, What, How, When, Where and Why of DevTest Driving continuous testing with virtual services Enabling DevTest Automated, continuous testing speeds up the application delivery pipeline. The DevTest framework from CA Technologies provides By leveraging test automation and virtual services solutions that focus on shortening the development to simulate unavailable systems across the software Elements that differentiate CA and testing cycles to increase speed to market, improve development lifecycle (SDLC), developers, testers, testing with virtual services: quality, reduce infrastructure spend, and mitigate risk. integration, and performance teams can work in Components of the DevTest environment, CA Application parallel, taking advantage of increased collaborative • Parallel development and testing in a Test invokes and verifies functionality at every layer of opportunities in a DevOps-enabled IT environment. DevOps environment the application, and CA Service Virtualization simulates This productive testing environment helps build strong, • Shift left to test early and test more in the unavailable systems by emulating their dynamic empowered development and testing teams. software lifecycle behavior, data, and performance. These solutions help • Widest multi-protocol support available create an excuse-free testing environment that uses Automated DevTest with virtual services facilitates virtual services to speed up the testing of applications exploratory testing by enabling testers to create more • Simulation of observed behaviors, stateful while increasing quality. on-demand test scenarios and conditions without transactions, and performance scenarios extensive environmental and data provisioning. • Realistic ways to emulate application testing Overcoming Testing Challenges A major challenge for development and QA teams is • Ease of administration the inability to quickly and efficiently test components they are working on. Time-consuming, manual testing processes, manual test data management, data volatility, and data sensitivity directly impact the timely delivery of quality applications. CA Service Virtualization and CA Application Test solution set DevTest Industry-leading framework for CA Application Test companies to develop, test, and CA Service Virtualization release software with greater agility and higher quality Allows for all types of Allows for continuous testing of multi-tiered development and architectures at any layer testing of software 2 You Can Test Continuously With Virtual Services Quick, highly productive, collaborative chain of testing for the continuous delivery of quality applications Service virtualization provides testing teams across Full stack API testing the application development and delivery ecosystem Run tests across the whole stack to validate APIs at with a chain of API test capabilities that are automated every layer of a complex, multi-tiered application, and easy to maintain—saving time and effort. DevTest allowing for complex workflows and the stateful with virtual services has the ability to virtualize APIs behavior needed to achieve genuine reuse of test assets. and drive API tests at any layer, even for unavailable or isolated systems. Development testing team deployments Component-level performance testing App 2 (SUT) Virtualize dependencies to isolate the system under App development test (SUT) to the desired granularity (and scope to any number of applications or systems) and conduct a App(s) SUT consumes virtual services CA DevTest performance test at any phase of the SDLC. simulators run the actual tests Create, maintain, deploy, and administer virtual Shift left and modularize the ability to performance test services to local DevTest VSE server to provide more developers and testers with greater App 1 (SUT) Create, maintain, deploy, and App development insight on the performance of their code earlier in the administer virtual services to process. local DevTest VSE server App(s) SUT consumes Execute functional tests Codeless testing ability virtual services with DevTest test Use CA Application Test to run tests with no test script or code to write or maintain. Enable developers and non-developers to collaborate on testing with high Functional testing team deployments productivity, even against headless, middle-tier services Option 1—Functional testers can now continued Step 3—The targeted application that is the SUT has Option 2—Functional testers can now continue functional and apps with no interface. functional testing of the SUT that is consuming its endpoint configured to point to the VSE server in testing of the SUT that is consuming constraint-free virtual constraint-free virtual services with existing testing place of the existing service endpoint. services using the CA Application Test that is part of the CA tools. Service Virtualization platform. Integration with existing application development processes and test Test application with App (SUT) consumes virtual services Execeute Functional Tests other test tool with CA Application Test management tools Easily store and launch test cases with CA Application Test as actionable assets alongside source code Functional tester(s) App (SUT) App (SUT) Functional test(s) using using existing testing tools CA Application Test management (SCM), requirements management, build Step 2—Once a virtual service for the constrained system has been created and issue tracking of test management tools. and/or modified, it is then deployed to a central VSE server. Development or QA Step 1—Virtual services for key interfaces for expert resource Initiate automated tests and results reports with the constrained system are created by either development or a QA expert resource integration into application lifecycle management (ALM) tools. 3 Widest Multiprotocol Support for DevTest Available May simplify and speed up testing anywhere, anytime. Service virtualization toolchain capabilities Any test, anywhere The DevTest framework from CA gives development With CA Application Test, testers can use a single tool to test APIs, UIs, and the layers that feed them. and testing teams a single tool to use to run any test, anywhere in the stack, at any time. Mobile UI/HTTP Presentation CA Application Test builds portable, executable layer test suites that are easy to chain together to create End-to-end functional test workflows that save work hours and enable continuous Services testing. layer With its wide protocol support, CA Service Virtualization Performance can chain together complex scenarios, like encrypted test MQ/IMS/MSMQ/ ESB TIBCO/WebMethods Integration payloads or encoded data embedded inside other date layer formats. An open software development kit (SDK) is also provided that extends the support to new Integration and customized protocols being supported by either test Data/app layer scripting or direct coding. Mainframe Database SAP Custom App Virtualize anything, test anything Out of the box, DevTest with CA Application Test and CA Service Virtualization features the broadest and CA Service Virtualization virtualizes almost any IT asset. deepest multi-data protocol support across front-end, middleware, and back-end technologies. Mainframes & mainframe components CICS-CICS, DB2®, MQ Common web services protocols: HTTP, HTTPS, • Platforms Oracle, Siebel, TIBCO, SAP, IBM REST, SOAP, XML, JSON SOA protocols SOAP, HTTP, XML, REST, JMS, MQ, UDDI, .NET, JDBC, CORBA, JAVA • ESB/middleware protocols: WebSphere® MQ, WebSphere Native, Standard JMS, Tibco JMS, Risk solution providers ChoicePoint, LexisNexis, Actimize Rabbit MQ Credit bureau TransUnion, Equifax, Experian • Mainframe protocols: CICS Link, CICS Transaction SMS gateway providers Clickatell, Skype Gateway (CTG), IMS Connect, DRDA, Copybook Bill payment services TEP, CheckFree ERP protocols: SAP—RFC/Jco, Idoc/Jco • Card processing services TSYS, Paypal Database protocols: JDBC • Teleconference service provider WebEx, Intercall Financial protocols: SWIFT, EDI/X12 • Travel systems (GDS) Galileo, Sabre • Proprietary: TCP (Raw Socket), Java™, Scriptable (JSR-223 compliant), Request Manager, 4 (Data-desensitizer) Create Virtual Services for the Test Environment Easily record, design and import application data. Virtual Service Environments (VSEs) provide a way meaningful data, and the flexibility and strictness of how for multiple teams to have a number of very current, a virtual service responds can be configured to meet the Virtual services are better than realistic ways to simulate the test of the application. needs of application data requirements. mocks and stubs. This enables performance and load testing to be conducted at a component level—just as if that Maintaining the VSE is made much simpler by the • Mocks and stubs are limited to the pre- component were hooked into the rest of the solution. availability of a Learning Mode that allows an existing canned requests and response every time VSE to add new functionality simply by connecting you run the test. CA Service Virtualization automates the creation of the VSE to an existing service, and exercising the new • They need to be manually and repetitively complete software-based environments to simulate functionality. hard coded. observed behaviors, stateful transactions and performance scenarios, not just piecemeal responders DevTest portal and workstation • You can’t tell how they’ll respond when or stubs. The DevTest platform can be accessed via a web-based replicating production-level loads and portal or locally installed
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Effectiveness of Software Testing Techniques in Enterprise: a Case Study
    MYKOLAS ROMERIS UNIVERSITY BUSINESS AND MEDIA SCHOOL BRIGITA JAZUKEVIČIŪTĖ (Business Informatics) EFFECTIVENESS OF SOFTWARE TESTING TECHNIQUES IN ENTERPRISE: A CASE STUDY Master Thesis Supervisor – Assoc. Prof. Andrej Vlasenko Vilnius, 2016 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 7 1. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SOFTWARE TESTING AND SOFTWARE QUALITY ASSURANCE ........................................................................................................................................ 11 1.1. Introduction to Software Quality Assurance ......................................................................... 11 1.2. The overview of Software testing fundamentals: Concepts, History, Main principles ......... 20 2. AN OVERVIEW OF SOFTWARE TESTING TECHNIQUES AND THEIR USE IN ENTERPRISES ...................................................................................................................................... 26 2.1. Testing techniques as code analysis ....................................................................................... 26 2.1.1. Static testing ...................................................................................................................... 26 2.1.2. Dynamic testing ................................................................................................................. 28 2.2. Test design based Techniques ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Studying the Feasibility and Importance of Software Testing: an Analysis
    Dr. S.S.Riaz Ahamed / Internatinal Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Vol.1(3), 2009, 119-128 STUDYING THE FEASIBILITY AND IMPORTANCE OF SOFTWARE TESTING: AN ANALYSIS Dr.S.S.Riaz Ahamed Principal, Sathak Institute of Technology, Ramanathapuram,India. Email:[email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT Software testing is a critical element of software quality assurance and represents the ultimate review of specification, design and coding. Software testing is the process of testing the functionality and correctness of software by running it. Software testing is usually performed for one of two reasons: defect detection, and reliability estimation. The problem of applying software testing to defect detection is that software can only suggest the presence of flaws, not their absence (unless the testing is exhaustive). The problem of applying software testing to reliability estimation is that the input distribution used for selecting test cases may be flawed. The key to software testing is trying to find the modes of failure - something that requires exhaustively testing the code on all possible inputs. Software Testing, depending on the testing method employed, can be implemented at any time in the development process. Keywords: verification and validation (V & V) 1 INTRODUCTION Testing is a set of activities that could be planned ahead and conducted systematically. The main objective of testing is to find an error by executing a program. The objective of testing is to check whether the designed software meets the customer specification. The Testing should fulfill the following criteria: ¾ Test should begin at the module level and work “outward” toward the integration of the entire computer based system.
    [Show full text]
  • Eliminate Software Development and Testing Constraints with Service Virtualization 2 | WHITE PAPER: KEY CAPABILITIES of a SERVICE VIRTUALIZATION SOLUTION Ca.Com
    WHITE PAPER | NOVEMBER 2014 Eliminate Software Development and Testing Constraints with Service Virtualization 2 | WHITE PAPER: KEY CAPABILITIES OF A SERVICE VIRTUALIZATION SOLUTION ca.com Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 Section 1: Creating a “Live-Like” Environment 4 Simulating Dependent Systems in Dev and Test Environments Section 2: Enabling Parallel Development and Testing 5 Dev and Test Teams Working Simultaneously Section 3: Handling Test Data for Out-of-Scope Dependencies 6 Missing Downstream Data is No Longer a Problem Section 4: Supporting Heterogeneous Technology and Platforms 8 Creating a Truly Complete Environment Section 5: Conclusion 10 Taking the Right First Steps 3 | WHITE PAPER: KEY CAPABILITIES OF A SERVICE VIRTUALIZATION SOLUTION ca.com Executive Summary Challenge The growing complexity of applications, along with globally-dispersed organizations, means teams face a barrage of bottlenecks as they strive to deliver. Examples of bottlenecks—or constraints—include access to mainframe or ERP test environments, lack of test data, access to third-party systems, and budget limitations. Often, constraints are created parallel development teams seeking access to the same environments. Often, teams try to either copy a complete environment in a test lab, or “mock up” responsive systems by coding their own versions for test purposes. This can become a costly and time-consuming endeavor. Opportunity In essence, Service Virtualization (SV) is the productization of the practice of “mocking and stubbing” dev and test environments, with enough realism and context to push development forward faster, while shifting testing left in the lifecycle so integration and release processes can happen faster, with higher quality and less risk.
    [Show full text]
  • Manual on Quality Assurance for Computer Software Related to the Safety of Nuclear Power Plants
    SIMPLIFIED SOFTWARE LIFE-CYCLE DIAGRAM FEASIBILITY STUDY PROJECT TIME I SOFTWARE P FUNCTIONAL I SPECIFICATION! SOFTWARE SYSTEM DESIGN DETAILED MODULES CECIFICATION MODULES DESIGN SOFTWARE INTEGRATION AND TESTING SYSTEM TESTING ••COMMISSIONING I AND HANDOVER | DECOMMISSION DESIGN DESIGN SPECIFICATION VERIFICATION OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE SOFTWARE LIFE-CYCLE PHASES TECHNICAL REPORTS SERIES No. 282 Manual on Quality Assurance for Computer Software Related to the Safety of Nuclear Power Plants f INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, VIENNA, 1988 MANUAL ON QUALITY ASSURANCE FOR COMPUTER SOFTWARE RELATED TO THE SAFETY OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS The following States are Members of the International Atomic Energy Agency: AFGHANISTAN GUATEMALA PARAGUAY ALBANIA HAITI PERU ALGERIA HOLY SEE PHILIPPINES ARGENTINA HUNGARY POLAND AUSTRALIA ICELAND PORTUGAL AUSTRIA INDIA QATAR BANGLADESH INDONESIA ROMANIA BELGIUM IRAN, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF SAUDI ARABIA BOLIVIA IRAQ SENEGAL BRAZIL IRELAND SIERRA LEONE BULGARIA ISRAEL SINGAPORE BURMA ITALY SOUTH AFRICA BYELORUSSIAN SOVIET JAMAICA SPAIN SOCIALIST REPUBLIC JAPAN SRI LANKA CAMEROON JORDAN SUDAN CANADA KENYA SWEDEN CHILE KOREA, REPUBLIC OF SWITZERLAND CHINA KUWAIT SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC COLOMBIA LEBANON THAILAND COSTA RICA LIBERIA TUNISIA COTE D'lVOIRE LIBYAN ARAB JAMAHIRIYA TURKEY CUBA LIECHTENSTEIN UGANDA CYPRUS LUXEMBOURG UKRAINIAN SOVIET SOCIALIST CZECHOSLOVAKIA MADAGASCAR REPUBLIC DEMOCRATIC KAMPUCHEA MALAYSIA UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S MALI REPUBLICS REPUBLIC OF KOREA MAURITIUS UNITED ARAB
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Service Virtualization IBM Middleware User Community Ask the Experts Series
    An Introduction to Service Virtualization IBM Middleware User Community Ask the Experts Series Matt Tarnawsky Offering Manager, API Testing & Service Virtualization © 2016 IBM Corporation Agenda What is service virtualization? How can I make use of service virtualization? How do I create virtual services? Tools and Integrations © 2016 IBM Corporation Page 2 What is Service Virtualization? Presentation tier SOA/BPM B2B Database ESB Mainframe © 2016 IBM Corporation Page 3 What is Service Virtualization? Presentation tier SOA/BPM B2B Virtual Services Database ESB Mainframe © 2016 IBM Corporation Page 4 Shift Left Automated Integration Testing C o Traditional Service Virtualization l UI Testing = Start testing earlier l a Test Automation b o UNIT SERVICE UI = Test repeatedly and r continuously a Deployment Automation t Exploratory Testing i = Provision and o orchestrate the process n Service Virtualization © 2016 IBM Corporation Page 6 Multi-Speed IT Big Big Bang! Bang! Presentation layer Integrate Integrate Middleware component 1 week 1 week Mainframe component typically 6 Weeks typically 6 Weeks © 2016 IBM Corporation Page 7 7 Actual Service/App Virtual Service/App © 2016 IBM Corporation Page 8 – Isolating parts of the system Other uses such as UI or business processes – Creating new test scenarios – Performance testing – Shielding production systems from test calls © 2016 IBM Corporation Page 9 Rational Test Virtualization Server Presentation Layer – Examine integration protocols and messages to verify end-to-end communication – Reuse integration
    [Show full text]
  • Model-Based Api Testing for Smt Solvers
    MODEL-BASED API TESTING FOR SMT SOLVERS Aina Niemetz ?y, Mathias Preiner ?y, Armin Biere ? ?Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria yStanford University, USA SMT Workshop 2017, July 22 – 23 Heidelberg, Germany SMT Solvers highly complex usually serve as back-end to some application key requirements: correctness robustness performance −! full verification difficult and still an open question −! solver development relies on traditional testing techniques 1/22 Testing of SMT Solvers State-of-the-art: unit tests regression test suite grammar-based black-box input fuzzing with FuzzSMT [SMT’09] generational input fuzzer for SMT-LIB v1 patched for SMT-LIB v2 compliance generates random but valid SMT-LIB input especially effective in combination with delta debugging not possible to test solver features not supported by the input language This work: model-based API fuzz testing −! generate random valid API call sequences 2/22 Model-Based API fuzz testing −! generate random valid API call sequences Previously: model-based API testing framework for SAT [TAP’13] implemented for the SAT solver Lingeling allows to test random solver configurations (option fuzzing) allows to replay erroneous solver behavior −! results promising for other solver back-ends Here: model-based API testing framework for SMT lifts SAT approach to SMT implemented for the SMT solver Boolector tailored to Boolector for QF_(AUF)BV with non-recursive first-order lambda terms −! effective and promising for other SMT solvers −! more general approach left to future
    [Show full text]
  • Test-Driven Development in Enterprise Integration Projects
    Test-Driven Development in Enterprise Integration Projects November 2002 Gregor Hohpe Wendy Istvanick Copyright ThoughtWorks, Inc. 2002 Table of Contents Summary............................................................................................................. 1 Testing Complex Business Applications......................................................... 2 Testing – The Stepchild of the Software Development Lifecycle?............................................... 2 Test-Driven Development............................................................................................................. 2 Effective Testing........................................................................................................................... 3 Testing Frameworks..................................................................................................................... 3 Layered Testing Approach ........................................................................................................... 4 Testing Integration Solutions............................................................................ 5 Anatomy of an Enterprise Integration Solution............................................................................. 5 EAI Testing Challenges................................................................................................................ 6 Functional Testing for Integration Solutions................................................................................. 7 EAI Testing Framework ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Devsecops DEVELOPMENT & DEVOPS INFRASTRUCTURE
    DevSecOps DEVELOPMENT & DEVOPS INFRASTRUCTURE CREATE SECURE APPLICATIONS PARASOFT’S APPROACH - BUILD SECURITY IN WITHOUT DISRUPTING THE Parasoft provides tools that help teams begin their security efforts as DEVELOPMENT PROCESS soon as the code is written, starting with static application security test- ing (SAST) via static code analysis, continuing through testing as part of Parasoft makes DevSecOps possible with API and the CI/CD system via dynamic application security testing (DAST) such functional testing, service virtualization, and the as functional testing, penetration testing, API testing, and supporting in- most complete support for important security stan- frastructure like service virtualization that enables security testing be- dards like CWE, OWASP, and CERT in the industry. fore the complete application is fully available. IMPLEMENT A SECURE CODING LIFECYCLE Relying on security specialists alone prevents the entire DevSecOps team from securing software and systems. Parasoft tooling enables the BENEFIT FROM THE team with security knowledge and training to reduce dependence on PARASOFT APPROACH security specialists alone. With a centralized SAST policy based on in- dustry standards, teams can leverage Parasoft’s comprehensive docs, examples, and embedded training while the code is being developed. ✓ Leverage your existing test efforts for Then, leverage existing functional/API tests to enhance the creation of security security tests – meaning less upfront cost, as well as less maintenance along the way. ✓ Combine quality and security to fully understand your software HARDEN THE CODE (“BUILD SECURITY IN”) Getting ahead of application security means moving beyond just test- ✓ Harden the code – don’t just look for ing into building secure software in the first place.
    [Show full text]
  • Continuous Quality and Testing to Accelerate Application Development
    Continuous Quality and Testing to Accelerate Application Development How to assess your current testing maturity level and practice continuous testing for DevOps Continuous Quality and Testing to Accelerate Application Development // 1 Table of Contents 03 Introduction 04 Why Is Continuous Quality and Testing Maturity Important to DevOps? 05 Continuous Testing Engineers Quality into DevOps 07 Best Practices for Well- Engineered Continuous Testing 08 Continuous Testing Maturity Levels Level 1: Chaos Level 2: Continuous Integration Level 3: Continuous Flow Level 4: Continuous Feedback Level 5: Continuous Improvement 12 Continuous Testing Maturity Assessment 13 How to Get Started with DevOps Testing? 14 Continuous Testing in the Cloud Choosing the right tools for Continuous Testing On-demand Development and Testing Environments with Infrastructure as Code The Right Tests at the Right Time 20 Get Started 20 Conclusion 21 About AWS Marketplace and DevOps Institute 21 Contributors Introduction A successful DevOps implementation reduces the bottlenecks related to testing. These bottlenecks include finding and setting up test environments, test configurations, and test results implementation. These issues are not industry specific. They can be experienced in manufacturing, service businesses, and governments alike. They can be reduced by having a thorough understanding and a disciplined, mature implementation of Continuous Testing and related recommended engineering practices. The best place to start addressing these challenges is having a good understanding of what Continuous Testing is. Marc Hornbeek, the author of Engineering DevOps, describes it as: “A quality assessment strategy in which most tests are automated and integrated as a core and essential part of DevOps. Continuous Testing is much more than simply ‘automating tests.’” In this whitepaper, we’ll address the best practices you can adopt for implementing Continuous Quality and Testing on the AWS Cloud environment in the context of the DevOps model.
    [Show full text]
  • Devops Point of View an Enterprise Architecture Perspective
    DevOps Point of View An Enterprise Architecture perspective Amsterdam, 2020 Management summary “It is not the strongest of the species that survive, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.”1 Setting the scene Goal of this Point of View In the current world of IT and the development of This point of view aims to create awareness around the IT-related products or services, companies from transformation towards the DevOps way of working, to enterprise level to smaller sizes are starting to help gain understanding what DevOps is, why you need it use the DevOps processes and methods as a part and what is needed to implement DevOps. of their day-to-day organization process. The goal is to reduce the time involved in all the An Enterprise Architecture perspective software development phases, to achieve greater Even though it is DevOps from an Enterprise Architecture application stability and faster development service line perspective, this material has been gathered cycles. from our experiences with customers, combined with However not only on the technical side of the knowledge from subject matter experts and theory from organization is DevOps changing the playing within and outside Deloitte. field, also an organizational change that involves merging development and operations teams is Targeted audience required with an hint of cultural changes. And last but not least the skillset of all people It is specifically for the people within Deloitte that want to involved is changing. use this as an accelerator for conversations and proposals & to get in contact with the people who have performed these type of projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Model-Based API Testing for SMT Solvers∗
    Model-Based API Testing for SMT Solvers∗ Aina Niemetz, Mathias Preiner, and Armin Biere Institute for Formal Models and Verification Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria Abstract Verification back ends such as SMT solvers are typically highly complex pieces of soft- ware with performance, correctness and robustness as key requirements. Full verification of SMT solvers, however, is difficult due to their complex nature and still an open question. Grammar-based black-box input fuzzing proved to be effective to uncover bugs in SMT solvers but is entirely input-based and restricted to a certain input language. State-of-the- art SMT solvers, however, usually provide a rich API, which often introduces additional functionality not supported by the input language. Previous work showed that applying model-based API fuzzing to SAT solvers is more effective than input fuzzing. In this pa- per, we introduce a model-based API testing framework for our SMT solver Boolector. Our experimental results show that model-based API fuzzing in combination with delta debugging techniques is effective for testing SMT solvers. 1 Introduction State-of-the-art Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) solvers are typically highly complex pieces of software, and since they usually serve as back-end to some application, the level of trust in this application strongly depends on the level of trust in the underlying solver. Full verification of SMT solvers, however, is difficult due to their complex nature and still an open question. Hence, solver developers usually rely on traditional testing techniques such as unit and regression tests. At the SMT workshop in 2009, in [10] Brummayer et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Continuous Testing for Devops Evolving Beyond Simple Automation
    Technical Whitepaper 1 Continuous Testing for DevOps Evolving Beyond Simple Automation INTRODUCTION DevOps represents a cultural shift that stresses collaboration be- on acceleration. Moreover, adopting a bona fide Continuous Testing tween the business, developers, and IT professionals. Software test process (more than just automated tests running regularly) helps automation can enhance these connections and help organizations promote all of the core pillars of DevOps: Culture, Automation, Lean, achieve desired SDLC acceleration, but it’s important to recognize Metrics, and Sharing. that automation is just one piece of the DevOps puzzle. In this paper, we’ll explore why and how Continuous Testing’s real- Since testing is often one of the greatest constraints in the SDLC, time objective assessment of an application’s business risks is a optimizing quality processes to allow testing to begin earlier, as well critical component of DevOps. as shrink the amount of testing required, can have a marked impact DEVOPS PRINCIPLES There are several key pieces to understanding DevOps revolutions and they are often brought about by a compelling event at an organization, such as a shift to agile. As organizations start to move into an agile development methodology, they start to uncover other processes that can be accelerated, such as delivery by DevOps and testing by Continuous Testing. The acceleration that is set in motion via agile makes it necessary to accelerate the release schedule. In order to ensure a successful release, an organization must adopt continuous testing to make sure the conveyer belt does not break down. The modernization maturity model has these three distinct phases: AGILE Agile software development is a different way of thinking about approaching the challenge of development time.
    [Show full text]