DOCSLIB.ORG

ISSN 2221-2698 Arkhangelsk DOI 10.17238/Issn2221-2698.2016.23

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ISSN 2221-2698 Arkhangelsk DOI 10.17238/Issn2221-2698.2016.23 ISSN 2221-2698 Arkhangelsk DOI 10.17238/issn2221-2698.2016.23 Arctic and North. 2016. N 23 2 ISSN 2221-2698 Арктика и Север / Arctic and North. 2016. № 23 © Северный (Арктический) федеральный университет имени М. В. Ломоносова, 2016 © Редакция электронного научного журнала «Арктика и Север», 2016 Журнал «Арктика и Север» зарегистрирован в Роскомнадзоре как электронное пери- одическое издание на русском и английском языках, свидетельство Эл № ФС77-42809 от 26 ноября 2010 г.; в Научной электронной библиотеке eLIBRARY, РИНЦ, лицензионный договор № 96-04/2011R от 12 апреля 2011 г.; в базах данных: Directory of Open Access Journals — DOAJ (2013); Global Serials Directory Ulrichsweb, США (2013); NSD, Норвегия (2015); InfoBase Index, Индия (2015). Выходит в свет не менее 4 выпусков в год. Учредитель — ФГАОУ ВПО «Северный (Арктический) федеральный университет име- ни М.В. Ломоносова». Главный редактор — Лукин Юрий Федорович, доктор исторических наук, профессор. Все номера журнала находятся в свободном доступе в Интернете на рус- ском и английском языках. Правила направления, рецензирования и опубликования науч- ных статей, декларация об этике опубликованы на сайте: http://narfu.ru/aan/rules/ Журнал публикует статьи, в которых объектом исследования являются Арктика и Север, по: 08.00.00 Экономические науки. 22.00.00 Социологические науки. 23.00.00 Политология. Плата с авторов, в том числе с аспирантов и студентов, за публикацию статей не взимается. Гонорары не выплачиваются. Все рукописи рецензируются. Редакция рассматривает факт направления и получения авторских рукописей как передачу авторами своих прав на публи- кацию в журнале «Арктика и Север» и размещение в базах данных, включая РИНЦ, DOAJ и другие, что способствует продвижению публикационной активности авторов и отвечает их интересам. The journal “Arctic and North” is registered at Roskomnadzor as an internet periodical is- sued in Russian and English, Registration certificate El № FS77-42809, November 26, 2010; at the system of the Russian Science Citation Index (RSCI), license contract № 96-04/2011R, April 12, 2011; at the catalogs of international databases: Directory of Open Access Journals — DOAJ (2013); Global Serials Directory Ulrichsweb, USA (2013); NSD, Norway (2015); InfoBase Index, India (2015). The Journal is issued not less than 4 times per year. The Founder — Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov. Editor- in-Chief — Yury Fedorovich Lukin, Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor, Honorary Worker of the higher education of the Russian Federation. All journal issues are available free of charge in Rus- sian and English. Rules and regulations on submission, peer reviews, publication and the Declara- tion of Ethics are available at: http://narfu.ru/aan/rules/ The Journal is devoted to the scientific articles focused on the Arctic and the North relevant for the following professional degrees: 08.00.00 Economics; 22.00.00 Social science; 23.00.00 Po- litical science. No payments for publication are collected from authors, including students and post-graduate students. Honorariums are not paid. Аll manuscripts are reviewed. The Editorial Board considers receiving of the manuscripts as an authors’ transfer of rights to be published in “Arctic and North” and be placed in the databases, including RSCI and DOAJ that assists and pro- mote the publishing activity of the authors and is in author’s interests. Our English webpage is located at: http://narfu.ru/en/research/journals/ann/ We will be glad to see you among the authors of “Arctic and North”! Arctic and North. 2016. N 23 3 Содержание. Сontents ЭКОНОМИКА, ПОЛИТИКА, СОЦИУМ И КУЛЬТУРА ECONOMICS, POLITICAL SCIENCЕ, SOCIETY AND CULTURE Журавель В.П. Россия в Арктике. Будет ли Госкомиссия её рулевым? 5 Valeriy P. Zhuravel. Russia in the Arctic. Will the State Commission be its helmsman? Коптяева А.А. Международный имидж государства как инструмент мягкой силы 15 Anna A. Koptyaeva The international image of the state as an instrument of soft power Пегин Н.А. Национальная арктическая транспортная линия: проблемы и перспективы 28 Nikolay A. Pegin National Arctic Transport Line: problems and prospects Плисецкий Е.Е. Какие проблемы представители местной власти и жители посёлка Бе- резово Ханты-Мансийского автономного округа — Югры считают самыми главными 35 Evgeny E. Plisetsky What problems the people of the Berezovo village of the Khanty- Mansiisky Autonomous District – Yugra consider the major Цветков А.Ю. Миссия в стратегическом управлении территорией (на примере Соло- вецкого архипелага) 44 Alexander Y. Tsvetkov Mission in the strategic territory management (on the example of the Solovetsky Archipelago) АРКТИЧЕСКИЙ ТУРИЗМ В РОССИИ ARCTIC TOURISM IN RUSSIA Бызова Н.М. Природный туристский потенциал островов западного сектора Российской Арктики 50 Natalia M. Byzova The natural tourist potential of the islands in the western sector of the Russian Arctic Голубева Е. И., Тульская Н. И., Цекина М.В., Кирашева Н. И. Экологический туризм на ООПТ в Российской Арктике: перспективы и проблемы 55 Elena I. Golubeva, Nadezhda I. Tulskaya, Maria V. Tsekina, Natalia I. Kirasheva Ecological tourism in protected natural areas of the Russian Arctic: prospects and challenges Кузнецов В.С. Комплексный подход к развитию туризма на особо охраняемых при- родных территориях 65 Victor S. Kuznetsov An integrated approach to tourism development in protected natural areas Лукин Ю.Ф. Арктический туризм: рейтинг регионов, возможности и угрозы 77 Yury F. Lukin Arctic tourism: the rating of regions, the оpportunities and threats Харлампьева Н.К. Теоретико-методологическое обоснование развития туризма в Арктике Nadezhda K. Kharlampieva Theory and methodology of the Arctic tourism development 101 Arctic and North. 2016. N 23 4 СОХРАНЕНИЕ КУЛЬТУРНОЙ И ПРИРОДНОЙ СРЕДЫ АРКТИКИ PROTECTING CULTURAL AND NATURAL ENVIRONMENT OF THE ARCTIC Обоимов А.П. Заветная мечта Федора Конюхова 106 Alexander P. Оboimov Fedor Konyukhov’s dream ОБЗОРЫ. REVIEWS Зайков К.С., Калинина М.Р., Тамицкий А.М., Сабуров А.А., Шепелев Е.А. Научно- образовательное пространство Арктики: Норвегия 120 Konstantin S. Zaikov, Marina R. Kalinina, Aleksander M. Tamitskiy, Aleksander A. Saburov, Evgeny A. Shepelev. Scientific and educational space of the Arctic: Norway Лукин Ю.Ф. Российская Арктика или Арктическая зона 143 Yury F. Lukin Russian Arctic or the Arctic zone 4-е заседание Арктического экспертного клуба САФУ имени М.В. Ломоносова 158 4th meeting of the Arctic Expert Club of NArFU named after M.V. Lomonosov РЕЗЮМЕ. SUMMARY Авторы, аннотации, ключевые слова / Authors, abstracts, keywords 164 Редакционный совет журнала «Арктика и Север» / Editorial board of “Arctic and North” 169 journal Выходные данные / Output data 171 Arctic and North. 2016. N 23 5 ECONOMICS, POLITICAL SCIENCЕ, SOCIETY AND CULTURE UDC 342.58 DOI: 10.17238/issn2221-2698.2016.23.5 Russia in the Arctic. Will the State Commission be its helmsman? © Valeriy P. Zhuravel, Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor, Senior Research Fellow, Center of Northern Europe, RAS Institute of Europe. E- mail: [email protected] Abstract. The article is focused on the analysis of the decisions on the develop- ment and exploration of the Arctic. It also reveals the activity of the State Com- mission on the Development of the Arctic. It notes the slow solution of problems of energy, information, transportation security of the remote settlements in the Russian Arctic. Unresolved issues of legal support of the guarantee and compensation system caused a cer- tain degree of concern for persons working on the territory of the North in the Arctic. This list of existing problems could be extended. Activities of the State Commission confirm the thesis that Russia intends to provide reliable and long-term national interests in the Arctic. Keywords: Arctic, the development, the State Commission, the problems The continuity of the soviet and Russian policy in the Arctic remains a hot topic. After the col- lapse of the Soviet Union in the context of the new geopolitical situation in the world, Russia has be- gun to formulate a new Arctic policy, because in the 1980s the Soviet experience was mostly lost. This article examines decisions on the development of the Arctic, and policy implementation. Decisions on the development and exploration of the Arctic In 1992, an inter-ministerial Commission for the Arctic and Antarctic Affairs was estab- lished, which replaced the RSFSR State Commission on Arctic and Antarctic Affairs. In 1996, there was an approved program of development of hydrocarbon reserves on the shelf of the Arctic seas of Russia until 2010. Russia ratified the Convention on the law of the Sea 1982 in December 2001 to increase the limits of its continental shelf of Russia but failed. The Commission considered the evidence provided by the Russian side concerning the Lomonosov Ridge unconvincing when iden- tifying its structure as an undersea continuation of the continental shelf. However, this did not reduce attention to the country's leadership in the Arctic and its problems. September 18, 2008: the President of the Russian Federation approved the framework of the State policy of the Russian Federation in the Arctic for the period up to the year 2020 and beyond, which identified the objectives and strategic priorities of the State policy of Russia in the Arctic and North. 2016. N 23 6 Arctic. In order to carry out the tasks defined in this document, according to experts, the state should begin more productive
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gap Analysis in Support of Cpan: the Russian Arctic
    CAFF Habitat Conservation Report No. 9 GAP ANALYSIS IN SUPPORT OF CPAN: THE RUSSIAN ARCTIC Igor Lysenko and David Henry CAFF INTERNATIONAL SECRETRARIAT 2000 This report, prepared by Igor Lysenko, World Conservation Monitoring Centre (WCMC) and David Henry, United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) Global Resource Information Database (GRID)-Arendal, is a technical account of a Gap Analysis Project conducted for the Russian Arctic in 1997-1999 in support of the Circumpolar Protected Areas Network (CPAN) of CAFF. It updates the status and spatial distribution of protected areas within the CAFF area of the Russian Federation and provides, in 22 GIs based maps and several data sets, a wealth of information relevant for present and future management decisions related to habitat conservation in the Russian Arctic. The present Gap Analysis for the Russian Arctic was undertaken in response to the CPAN Strategy and Action Plan requirement for countries to identify gaps in protected area coverage of ecosystems and species and to select sites for further action. Another important objective was to update the Russian data base. The Analysis used a system of twelve landscape units instead of the previously used vegetation zone system as the basis to classify Russia's ecosystems. A comparison of the terrestrial landscape systems against protected area coverage indicates that 27% of the glacier ecosystem is protected, 9.3% of the tundra (treeless portion) and 4.7% of the forest systems within the Arctic boundaries are under protection, but the most important Arctic forested areas have only 0.1% protection. In general, the analysis indicates a negative relationship between ecosystem productivity and protection, which is consistent with findings in 1996.
    [Show full text]
  • View Map of the Entire Serial Property
    IUCN World Heritage Outlook: https://worldheritageoutlook.iucn.org/ Volcanoes of Kamchatka - 2017 Conservation Outlook Assessment (archived) IUCN Conservation Outlook Assessment 2017 (archived) Finalised on 09 November 2017 Please note: this is an archived Conservation Outlook Assessment for Volcanoes of Kamchatka. To access the most up-to-date Conservation Outlook Assessment for this site, please visit https://www.worldheritageoutlook.iucn.org. Volcanoes of Kamchatka عقوملا تامولعم Country: Russian Federation Inscribed in: 1996 Criteria: (vii) (viii) (ix) (x) This is one of the most outstanding volcanic regions in the world, with a high density of active volcanoes, a variety of types, and a wide range of related features. The six sites included in the serial designation group together the majority of volcanic features of the Kamchatka peninsula. The interplay of active volcanoes and glaciers forms a dynamic landscape of great beauty. The sites contain great species diversity, including the world's largest known variety of salmonoid fish and exceptional concentrations of sea otter, brown bear and Stellar's sea eagle. © UNESCO صخلملا 2017 Conservation Outlook Significant concern Conservation outlook for the geological values and also for the scenic values of the site is good as these are very robust against human activities, and because such activities are still relatively localized within the property. Conservation outlook is worse for the rich biodiversity values, which are protected by the size, remoteness, relative inaccessibility and pristine state of the site. Unsustainable use of natural resources (legal and illegal hunting and fishing) have started to erode these values along the additional threats posed by existing roads and the trend towards infrastructure development and associated with it increasing accessibility which will further increase the threats for biodiversity values.
    [Show full text]
  • Migration: on the Move in Alaska
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Alaska Park Science Alaska Region Migration: On the Move in Alaska Volume 17, Issue 1 Alaska Park Science Volume 17, Issue 1 June 2018 Editorial Board: Leigh Welling Jim Lawler Jason J. Taylor Jennifer Pederson Weinberger Guest Editor: Laura Phillips Managing Editor: Nina Chambers Contributing Editor: Stacia Backensto Design: Nina Chambers Contact Alaska Park Science at: [email protected] Alaska Park Science is the semi-annual science journal of the National Park Service Alaska Region. Each issue highlights research and scholarship important to the stewardship of Alaska’s parks. Publication in Alaska Park Science does not signify that the contents reflect the views or policies of the National Park Service, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute National Park Service endorsement or recommendation. Alaska Park Science is found online at: www.nps.gov/subjects/alaskaparkscience/index.htm Table of Contents Migration: On the Move in Alaska ...............1 Future Challenges for Salmon and the Statewide Movements of Non-territorial Freshwater Ecosystems of Southeast Alaska Golden Eagles in Alaska During the A Survey of Human Migration in Alaska's .......................................................................41 Breeding Season: Information for National Parks through Time .......................5 Developing Effective Conservation Plans ..65 History, Purpose, and Status of Caribou Duck-billed Dinosaurs (Hadrosauridae), Movements in Northwest
    [Show full text]
  • New Bryophyte Records. 4 – Новые Бриологические Находки
    Arctoa (2015) 24: 224-264 doi: 10.15298/arctoa.24.23 NEW BRYOPHYTE RECORDS. 4 – НОВЫЕ БРИОЛОГИЧЕСКИЕ НАХОДКИ. 4 Sofronova E.V. (ed.), O.M. Afonina, T.V. Akatova, Софронова Е.В. (ред.), О.М. Афонина, Т.В. Ака- E.N. Andrejeva, E.Z. Baisheva, A.G. Bezgodov, I.V. това, Е.Н. Андреева, Э.З. Баишева, А.Г. Безгодов, И.В. Blagovetshenskiy, E.A. Borovichev, E.V. Chemeris, A.M. Благовещенский, Е.А. Боровичев, Е.В. Чемерис, А.М. Chernova, I.V.Czernyadjeva, G.Ya. Doroshina, N.V. Du- Чернова, И.В. Чернядьева, Г.Я. Дорошина, Н.В. Дуда- dareva, S.V. Dudov, M.V. Dulin, V.E. Fedosov, S.M. рева, С.В. Дудов, М.В. Дулин, В.Э. Федосов, С.М. Gabitova, M.S. Ignatov, E.A. Ignatova, O.A. Kapitono- Габитова, М.С. Игнатов, Е.А. Игнатова, О.А. Капи- va, S.G. Kazanovsky, V.M. Kotkova, O.V. Lavrinenko, тонова, С.Г. Казановский, В.М. Коткова, О.В. Лаври- Yu.S. Mamontov, A. Mežaka, O.A. Mochalova, I.A. Ni- ненко, Ю.С. Мамонтов, А. Межака, О.А. Мочалова, kolajev, E.Yu. Noskova, A.A. Notov, D.A. Philippov, И.А. Николаев, Э.Ю. Носкова, A.A. Нотов, Д.А. Филип- O.Yu. Pisarenko, N.N. Popova, A.D. Potemkin, E.I. Ro- пов, О.Ю. Писаренко, Н.Н. Попова, А.Д. Потёмкин, Е.И. zantseva, V.V. Teleganova, Ts. Tsegmed, V.I. Zolotov Розанцева, В.В. Телеганова, Ц. Цэгмэд, В.И. Золотов New liverwort records from Murmansk Province. евой (Afonina & Czernyadjeva, 1995) этот вид указы- 5.
    [Show full text]
  • RCN #33 21/8/03 13:57 Page 1
    RCN #33 21/8/03 13:57 Page 1 No. 33 Summer 2003 Special issue: The Transformation of Protected Areas in Russia A Ten-Year Review PROMOTING BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION IN RUSSIA AND THROUGHOUT NORTHERN EURASIA RCN #33 21/8/03 13:57 Page 2 CONTENTS CONTENTS Voice from the Wild (Letter from the Editors)......................................1 Ten Years of Teaching and Learning in Bolshaya Kokshaga Zapovednik ...............................................................24 BY WAY OF AN INTRODUCTION The Formation of Regional Associations A Brief History of Modern Russian Nature Reserves..........................2 of Protected Areas........................................................................................................27 A Glossary of Russian Protected Areas...........................................................3 The Growth of Regional Nature Protection: A Case Study from the Orlovskaya Oblast ..............................................29 THE PAST TEN YEARS: Making Friends beyond Boundaries.............................................................30 TRENDS AND CASE STUDIES A Spotlight on Kerzhensky Zapovednik...................................................32 Geographic Development ........................................................................................5 Ecotourism in Protected Areas: Problems and Possibilities......34 Legal Developments in Nature Protection.................................................7 A LOOK TO THE FUTURE Financing Zapovedniks ...........................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • NATIONAL PROTECTED AREAS of the RUSSIAN FEDERATION: of the RUSSIAN FEDERATION: AREAS PROTECTED NATIONAL Vladimir Krever, Mikhail Stishov, Irina Onufrenya
    WWF WWF is one of the world’s largest and most experienced independent conservation WWF-Russia organizations, with almost 5 million supporters and a global network active in more than 19, bld.3 Nikoloyamskaya St., 100 countries. 109240 Moscow WWF’s mission is to stop the degradation of the planet’s natural environment and to build a Russia future in which humans live in harmony with nature, by: Tel.: +7 495 727 09 39 • conserving the world’s biological diversity Fax: +7 495 727 09 38 • ensuring that the use of renewable natural resources is sustainable [email protected] • promoting the reduction of pollution and wasteful consumption. http://www.wwf.ru The Nature Conservancy The Nature Conservancy - the leading conservation organization working around the world to The Nature Conservancy protect ecologically important lands and waters for nature and people. Worldwide Office The mission of The Nature Conservancy is to preserve the plants, animals and natural 4245 North Fairfax Drive, Suite 100 NNATIONALATIONAL PPROTECTEDROTECTED AAREASREAS communities that represent the diversity of life on Earth by protecting the lands and waters Arlington, VA 22203-1606 they need to survive. Tel: +1 (703) 841-5300 http://www.nature.org OOFF TTHEHE RRUSSIANUSSIAN FFEDERATION:EDERATION: MAVA The mission of the Foundation is to contribute to maintaining terrestrial and aquatic Fondation pour la ecosystems, both qualitatively and quantitatively, with a view to preserving their biodiversity. Protection de la Nature GGAPAP AANALYSISNALYSIS To this end, it promotes scientific research, training and integrated management practices Le Petit Essert whose effectiveness has been proved, while securing a future for local populations in cultural, 1147 Montricher, Suisse economic and ecological terms.
    [Show full text]
  • Helicopter Tour to Kuril Lake-Caldera of Volcano Ksudach-Khodutkinskye Hot Springs (Tour 2)
    HELICOPTER TOUR TO VALLEY OF GEYSERS-CALDERA OF VOLCANO UZON-NALYCHEVO VALLEY (TOUR 1) Period – all the year Transportation – helicopter Tour time – 6 hours Flight time – approximately 2 hours 15 minutes The famous Valley of Geysers is a canyon which has one of the biggest geyser area in the world. It is hidden in a hard access gorge of the Kronotsky Nature Reserve. It is unrivalled in beauty, landscape grandeur and number of springs throwing out fountains of hot water and steam. Gushing geysers, raging mud cauldrons, a turquoise lake, hot water and steam jets flowing down the slopes together with the lush greenery of grass and trees create a really fantastic sight. Not far from the Valley of Geysers there is one more unique and impressive place - Uzon caldera. It is a giant cavity with the dimensions 9×12 km, resulting from destruction of the ancient volcano, having an intensive hydrothermal activity on the bottom. There are a lot of boiling and raging craters, numerous mud cauldrons and small volcanoes, yellow fumaroles areas, steamy grounds where the steam and hot water come out from the earth. The peculiarity of this place is the crater-like holes 25-40 m deep and in diameter 25-150 m, in which hot lakes of odd colours are situated. ROUTE 11.00-12.00 - Flight from heliport of Yelizovo city to the Valley of Geysers. Flying around Karymskiy and Malyi Semyachik active volcanoes. 12.00-13.30 - Excursion to the Valley of Geysers. 13.30-13.40 - Flying to the Uzon caldera. 13.40-14.30 - Excursion in the caldera of Uzon volcano.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving the Coverage and Management Efficiency of Protected Areas in the Steppe Biome of Russia
    Improving the coverage and management efficiency of protected areas in the Steppe Biome of Russia PIMS 4194 Terminal Evaluation, December 2016 Volume II (Annexes) Russian Federation GEF BD SO-1, SP-3 (GEF-4), Outcome 1.1 (GEF-5) Russian Federation Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment United National Development Program (UNDP) Table of Contents Annex 1 Terms of Reference ................................................................................... 2 Annex 2 Rating Scales ............................................................................................. 7 Annex 3 List of documents reviewed .................................................................... 8 Annex 4 MTR Itinerary & list of persons interviewed ....................................... 9 Annex 5 List of members of the ProJect Board (with active members in bold) 13 Annex 6 Maps of pilot sites .................................................................................. 15 Annex 7 The full PRF as it was submitted to the TE ......................................... 19 Annex 8 List of protected areas that were involved in the proJect ................. 57 Annex 9 List of proJect outputs and publications ............................................. 64 Annex 10 Example questionnaire used for data collection .............................. 96 Annex 11 Audit trail of comments on draft TE ................................................. 99 Annex 12 UNEG Code of Conduct Form ......................................................... 100 Annex 13 MTR Final
    [Show full text]
  • RUSSIAN FEDERATION This Large Site on the Western End of the Greater Caucasus Mountains Is in One of the Few Great Mountain Ranges of Europe Almost Undisturbed by Man
    WESTERN CAUCASUS RUSSIAN FEDERATION This large site on the western end of the Greater Caucasus Mountains is in one of the few great mountain ranges of Europe almost undisturbed by man. Its extensive mountain forests, from subtropical to alpine, are unique in Europe and its high pastures have been grazed only by wild animals. The site is on the edge of the Colchian centre of plant diversity barely 30 kilometres from the Black Sea. Stretching between lowlands and alpine mountains, it includes four-fifths of the ecosystems of the Caucasus and includes many endemic and relict species such as the reintroduced European bison. Threats to the site: Construction of more than 250 facilities for the 2014 Winter Olympics is heavily impinging on the site and region. COUNTRY Russian Federation NAME Western Caucasus NATURAL WORLD HERITAGE SERIAL SITE 1999: Inscribed on the World Heritage List under Natural Criteria ix and x. STATEMENT OF OUTSTANDING UNIVERSAL VALUE [pending] The UNESCO World Heritage Committee issued the following statement at the time of inscription: Justification for Inscription The Western Caucasus has a remarkable diversity of geology, ecosystems and species. It is of global significance as a centre of plant diversity. Along with the Virgin Komi World Heritage site, it is the only large mountain area in Europe that has not experienced significant human impact, containing extensive tracts of undisturbed mountain forests unique on the European scale. INTERNATIONAL DESIGNATION 1978: Kavkazskiy designated a Biosphere Reserve under the
    [Show full text]
  • IMCG Bulletin: August 2017
    1 IMCG Bulletin: August 2017 Word from the Secretary-General www.imcg.net Dear mire friends With deep pain in our hearts we have to report, that shortly after we had said goodbye to each other at the end of our fieldtrip in the Russian Arctic, on August 27 our IMCG member Maria (Masha) Noskova (*1971) has lost her life. Together with her husband Dmitry and their ten-year-old daughter Nastya, she died in a fire caused by an electricity short-circuit in their house in Vsevolozhska near St. Petersburg. Masha had sheered up our excursion with her pleasant character and several of us had made concrete plans for further cooperation. Her departure again reminds us how precious life is and how much we must appreciate the beautiful devoted people we may meet in our joint struggle for mire conservation. We will miss her… Masha (l.) during the IMCG Field Symposium at the border of Nenets Nature Reserve. Photo: Tatiana Minajewa. After the first contributions in the July issue, in this Bulletin more impressions of the 2017 IMCG Arctic Field Symposium and news items from all over the world. And, as always, a list with relevant recent peatland literature. Keep sharing your ideas and experiences by sending news, photographs, papers and other contributions for the September Bulletin by October, 5, 2017 to Hans Joosten at [email protected]. 2 IMCG News Masha Tatiana Minajewa ([email protected]) Masha Noskova was the youngest and last PhD student of Marina Botch and the one most close to her. Masha was the daughter of one of the greatest conservationists of North-West Russia, Georgy Noskov, who passed away in January this year, and Masha was keeping the traditions of her father.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport and Infrastructural Basis of the Tourism Development Strategy in the Arkhangelsk Oblast © Aleksandr Yu
    Aleksandr Yu. TSVETKOV. Transport and infrastructural basis … 35 UDC [338.48+332.14](470.11)(045) DOI: 10.37482/issn2221-2698.2020.38.44 Transport and infrastructural basis of the tourism development strategy in the Arkhangelsk Oblast © Aleksandr Yu. TSVETKOV, Cand. Sci. (Econ.), associate professor E-mail: [email protected] Department of Management, Higher School of Economics, Management and Law, Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov, Arkhangelsk, Russia Abstract. The article, devoted to the analysis of transport and geographical locations, describes possible strategies for the development of tourism in the Arkhangelsk Oblast. The main goal of the research was the development of logistic schemes of the transportation of tourists from the places of formation of tourist flows to the Arkhangelsk Oblast. The methodological basis of the article is to determine the economic dis- tances between potential tourist distribution centers and their places of interest in the area. Moscow, St. Petersburg, and Arkhangelsk were considered as the main towns of departure. Kargopol, Solvychegodsk, Kholmogory and Lomonosovo, Solovki, Kenozersky National Park, and Pinega caves are regarded as the main sites of tourist interest in the Arkhangelsk Oblast. It was determined that Kargopol is the most acces- sible for tourists, and Kenozersky National Park is the most recognizable by tourists but the least accessible. The object of world cultural heritage, the Monastery of the Transfiguration of the Saviour on Solovki is the most accessible for tourists from the territory of Karelia. It is recommended to optimize the schedule and to synchronize the work of transport for tourists to improve the transport accessibility of recreational facili- ties in the area.
    [Show full text]
  • CATALOG of SPECIES
    ARSARSARSARSARSARS ARSARS CollectionCollectionef ofof EntomopathogenicEntomopathogenic FungalFungal CulturesCultures CATALOG of SPECIES FULLY INDEXED [INCLUDES 9773 ISOLAtes] USDA-ARS Biological Integrated Pest Management Research Robert W. Holley Center for Agriculture and Health 538 Tower Road Ithaca, New York 14853-2901 28 July 2011 Search the ARSEF catalog online at http://www.ars.usda.gov/Main/docs.htm?docid=12125 ARSEF Collection Staff Richard A. Humber, Curator phone: [+1] 607-255-1276 fax: [+1] 607-255-1132 email: [email protected] Karen S. Hansen phone: [+1] 607-255-1274 fax: [+1] 607-255-1132 email: [email protected] Micheal M. Wheeler phone: [+1] 607-255-1274 fax: [+1] 607-255-1132 email: [email protected] USDA-ARS Biological IPM Research Unit Robert W. Holley Center for Agriculture & Health 538 Tower Road Ithaca, New York 14853-2901, USA IMPORTANT NOTE Recent phylogenetically based reclassifications of fungal pathogens of invertebrates Richard A. Humber Insect Mycologist and Curator, ARSEF UPDATED July 2011 Some seemingly dramatic and comparatively recent changes in the classification of a number of fungi may continue to cause confusion or a degree of discomfort to many of the clients of the cultures and informational resources provided by the ARSEF culture collection. This short treatment is an attempt to summarize some of these changes, the reasons for them, and to provide the essential references to the literature in which the changes are proposed. As the Curator of the ARSEF collection I wish to assure you that these changes are appropriate, progressive, and necessary to modernize and to stabilize the systematics of the fungal pathogens affecting insects and other invertebrates, and I urge you to adopt them into your own thinking, teaching, and publications.
    [Show full text]