25 Boulez: Structures Recomposed

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

25 Boulez: Structures Recomposed 25 Boulez: Structures Recomposed In [19], Pierre Boulez describes a compositional strategy called analyse cr´eatri- ce, creative analysis, which is opposed to what he calls “sterile academic” anal- ysis in that the analytical results are used as germs to create new compositions. Before discussing Boulez’s ideas in detail, we should stress that his procedure transcends the purely analytical or compositional activities: He proposes a co- herent double activity that includes both analysis and composition. This means that our own discourse in this chapter will deal with both, analysis and com- position, the latter more specifically realized by use of the music composition software RUBATO! [75]. 25.1 Boulez’s Idea of a Creative Analysis Let us explain the practical consequences of Boulez’s strategy for the analyt- ical and compositional efforts1. Anne Boissi`ere [15] has given a concise sum- mary of Boulez’s ideas on creative analysis, which comprise these core items: The analysis focuses more on the limits of the given composition than on the historical adequacy. These limits open up what has not been said, what was omitted or overlooked by that composer. This hermeneutic work is not driven to deduce a new composition as a special case of what has been recognized (deduction), nor is it meant to help build the new composition by a passage from the particular to the general (induction). Referring to Gilbert Simondon’s philosophical reflections [106], the creative movement consists of the opening of a topological neighborhood of the given analysis within a space of analytical parameters. In such a space, analytical structures similar to the given one are selected and eventually used as germs for the construction of new compositions. This ‘horizontal’ movement is called “transduction” by Simondon. In this transduction process, what Boulez calls the composer’s gesture, is the movement toward the creation of new compositions, which share precisely 1 For a more philosophical discussion of this approach, we refer to [82, ch. 7]. G. Mazzola et al., Musical Creativity, 279 Computational Music Science, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-24517-6 25, © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011 280 25 Boulez: Structures Recomposed those analytical structures reflecting the given analysis. More concretely, we take the analysis of the given work and make a number of “small” value changes to the analytical parameters. For example, if we have exhibited a set of pitch inversion symmetries that govern the given work, we may extend that set and include also time inversion symmetries (retrograde). Or if we have recognized that the voices of the different instruments are derived by some systematic procedure, e.g. time expansions (dilations) plus transpositions from a leading voice, then we may add more instruments and apply the same procedure, e.g. further time expansions (dilations) plus transpositions to define these added voices. This creative gesture—building new works from the transgression of the analytical structure discovered in the given work—is what Boissi`ere calls a detonation.Itispreciselythisactofbreakingthegivenstructuresandstepping into unknown neighborhoods that characterizes Boulez’s concept of an open work. Boulez’s approach is visibly akin to our concept of creativity. Boulez’s creative analysis takes the given work as the critical concept in our theory and then inspects its walls with the analytical efforts. The open work is exactly this analytical search for walls where the given work might be limited. The creative act then would consist in the action of opening those walls and stepping to new compositional paths. To our knowledge, these ambitious claims have not been backed by con- crete examples: How should and would such a strategy work in detail? This is what we have accomplished in a formal (mathematical) setup and on the level of computer-aided composition and what we want to discuss in this chapter. In view of Boulez’s poetical text, such an enterprise cannot be more than a first proposal. But we believe that it could open a fruitful discourse on the role of creativity in the dialectic between analysis and composition. In this sense, our approach is not a thesis but a detailed experiment following Boulez’s ideas. It is, therefore, completely logical to pursue the trajectory to its completion: to the construction of a full-fledged composition2. Our choice of Boulez’s Structures is not random; it relates to the promi- nent role that this composition has played in the development of serialism. This is also confirmed by the fact that Gy¨orgy Ligeti has published a very careful analysis of Structures, part Ia. Ligeti’s investigation [67] is neutral and pre- cise, but it abounds with strong judgments on the work’s compositional and aesthetic qualities. Therefore, our experimental application of creative anal- ysis to Structures is not by chance. The very success (or failure) of the se- rial method has been related to this composition, which was not only one of Boulez’s sucesses, but also a turning point in his compositional development. 2 It should however be noted that such a creative analysis had been applied in the case of Beethoven’s op. 106 [71] before we knew about Boulez’s idea. The present approach is somewhat more dramatic, since we shall now apply Boulez’s idea to two of his own works, namely Structures [17, 18]. 25.1 Boulez’s Idea of a Creative Analysis 281 In view of Boulez’s principle of creative analysis, when applied to his composi- tional turning point in the Structures, one is immediately led to the question: Would it be possible to write a world of new music on the principle of serialism or was it just a radical experiment without much long-range effect? This is an important question when taking seriously the idea of creative analysis, and not only as a recipe for fabricating yet another work. And it is also an impor- tant question relating to a more systematic and demystifying understanding of musical creativity using analytical activity. In our case, the Structures, the Boulezian gesture of opening a work’s limits is a doubly critical and difficult one: On the one hand, it should help determine whether the huge calculations that led to the composition are worth being reused with aesthetic success. On the other hand, the method of seri- alism also marks the computational limits of humans to compose music. This latter fact will lead to the question of using music technology and in particular computers in a creative context. We must understand here how to integrate computational power into cre- ative works of music, and on what level of creation this can or should be done. Boulez’s Structures is an excellent testbed to learn this lesson. It teaches us that the control of laborious computational processes cannot be systematically delegated to very limited human calculation power and that there is a life be- yond strictly human composition. To paraphrase Schoenberg, “Somebody had to be Boulez.” Of course, computers are widely used by modern composers, but it is a common belief that creativity is separated from such procedures; it terminates when the big ideas are set. And computers are just doing the mean calculations. Apart from being classically wrong, we shall see that this is not realistic. In fact, no composer would contest the creative contribution of trying out a new composition on the piano—playing it on the keys and listening to its acoustical realization, which may give a strong feedback for the creative dynamics, even on the gestural level of one’s hands, as is testified by Ligeti and other composers, see [68]. We have to contradict Marshall McLuhan: The medium is not always the message. But it gives the message’s germ the necessary mold and resonance to grow into a full-fledged composition. Before delving into the technical details, we should address the question of whether not only computational computer power is necessary or advanta- geous for modern compositions, but also conceptual mathematical power. Isn’t musical composition anyway sufficiently controlled by plain combinatorial de- vices: permutations, recombinations, enumerations, and the like? The question is in some sense parallel to the question of whether it is sufficient to control a computer’s behavior on the level of binary chains, or machine language. Or else the question of whether it is not completely sufficient to perform a composition for piano by simply controlling the mechanical finger movements and forgetting about all those psycho-physicological ‘illusions’ such as gestures. The parallelism lies in the fact that all of these activities are shaped by high-level concepts that create the coherence of low-level tokens in order to 282 25 Boulez: Structures Recomposed express thoughts and not just juxtapose myriad atomic units. Of course can one write a computer program in machine language, but only after having un- derstood the high-level architecture of one’s ideas. The artistic performance of a complex composition only succeeds when it is shaped on the high mental level of powerful gestures. And the composition of computationally complex musical works needs comprehensive and structurally powerful concepts. Com- binatorics is just a machine language of mathematical thinking. We shall see in the following analysis that it was precisely Ligeti’s combinatorial limitation that hindered his understanding of the real yoga of Boulez’s creative construc- tions. You can do combinatorics, but only if you know what is the steering idea—much as you can write the single notes of Beethoven’s Hammerklavier Sonata if you know the high-level ideas. The mathematics deployed in the mod- ern mathematical music theory is precisely the tool for such an enterprise. It is not by chance that traditional music analysis is so poor for the composition of advanced music: Its conceptual power is far too weak for precise complex constructions, let alone for their computer-aided implementation.
Recommended publications
  • An Analysis and Performer's Guide to the Sonatine for Flute and Piano by Pierre Boulez
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1999 An Analysis and Performer's Guide to the Sonatine for Flute and Piano by Pierre Boulez. Diana M. Tiffany Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Tiffany, Diana M., "An Analysis and Performer's Guide to the Sonatine for Flute and Piano by Pierre Boulez." (1999). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 6905. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/6905 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfihn master. UMI films the text directly fi'om the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in ^ew riter 6 ce, ixdnie others may be from any type o f computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproductioiL In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, b^inning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from 1 ^ to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]
  • Ana Rebrina Relation of Structure, Form and Perception in Post-Tonal
    Ana Rebrina Relation of Structure, Form and Perception in Post-Tonal Music Analysis of Compositions by Pierre Boulez, Jean Barraqué, Karel Goeyvaerts and Michel Fano Exposé for a Doctoral Dissertation Department of Historical Musicology, Music Theory and Church Music Studies Kunstuniversität Graz February 2019 Abstract This research explores the relation between the score, performance, and perception of post- tonal music. The focus is on performer’s actions and on perceptual consequences of these actions for the listener. The corpus of the study includes compositions associated with the Darmstadt Summer Course, all composed at a similar time and in comparable circumstances: three piano sonatas by Pierre Boulez, Piano Sonata by Jean Barraqué, Sonata for Two Pianos by Karel Goeyvaerts and Sonata for Two Pianos by Michel Fano. Since the serial organization of material is hardly manifested in sound realization in these complex post-tonal compositions, surface details are important for the perception. One of the objectives of this research is to determine auditory detectable details of musical surface and compare them in different performances. Since post-tonal music is often presented as inaccessible, speaking to only a narrow circle of listeners, the aim is to find possible approaches to comprehensive listening of post-tonal music through the perception of auditory details and their connection with formal sections. In addition, the aim is to discover whether performance analysis can assist music pedagogy in the deeper understanding of post-tonal music. For this purpose, the selected repertoire will be analyzed on several levels: traditional analysis of material organization and serial procedures based on sketches and pre-existing studies, historical background of compositions and recordings, structural analysis and performance analysis based on a comparison of selected parameters in different recordings, morphosyntactic analysis as an attempt to capture the details on the musical surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Serial Analysis, Parisian Reception, and Pierre Boulez's Structures 1A
    Sets and the City: Serial Analysis, Parisian Reception, and Pierre Boulez's Structures 1a Ben Parsons In April 1952, subscribers to the latest edition of the Paris-based journal La Revue musicale could, for the first time, have read the following declaration, separated from the main text by asterisks: * ** Affirmons, a notre tour, que tout musicien qui n' a pas ressenti-nous ne dissons pas compris, mais bien ressenti-la necessite de la langage dodecaphonique est INUTILE. Car son toute ~uvre se place a de<;:a des necessites de son epoque. (Boulez 1952d:1l9)! * * * The statement has since come to caricature our experience of high musical modernism. Its uncompromising tone has ensured the author's place in a narrowly defined historiography that continues to see him as the defender of a universal ("toutmusicien"; "son toute oeuvre") and abstract ("la langage dodecaphonique") musical system. The author, of course, was the then still relatively unknown Pierre Boulez, writing here in his early article "Eventuellement ... ".2 His ambition was to "link rhythmic to serial struc­ tures through a common organization which will also embrace the other characteristics of sound: dynamics, mode of attack, timbre; and then to ex­ pand this morphology into an integrated rhetoric" (Boulez 1991:115). In an analysis of the pre-compositional sketch material from his own recent Structures la for two pianos (1952), Boulez went on to describe what such a "useful" (that is to say, not "USELESS") serial music might be like. His was an exclusive musical system, presented in terms borrowed from contemporary mathematical, acoustic, and linguistic research.
    [Show full text]
  • Ensemble Intercontemporain Matthias Pintscher, Music Director
    Friday, November 6, 2015, 8pm Hertz Hall Ensemble intercontemporain Matthias Pintscher, Music Director PROGRAM Marco Stroppa (b. 1959) gla-dya. Études sur les rayonnements jumeaux (2006–2007) 1. Languido, lascivo (langoureux, lascif) 2. Vispo (guilleret) 3. Come una tenzone (comme un combat) 4. Lunare, umido (lunaire, humide) 5. Scottante (brûlant) Jens McManama, horn Jean-Christophe Vervoitte, horn Frank Bedrossian (b. 1971) We met as Sparks (2015) United States première Emmanuelle Ophèle, bass flute Alain Billard, contrabass clarinet Odile Auboin, viola Éric-Maria Couturier, cello 19 PROGRAM Beat Furrer (b. 1954) linea dell’orizzonte (2012) INTERMISSION Kurt Hentschläger (b. 1960)* Cluster.X (2015) Edmund Campion (b. 1957) United States première Kurt Hentschläger, electronic surround soundtrack and video Edmund Campion, instrumental score and live processing Jeff Lubow, software (CNMAT) * Audiovisual artist Kurt Hentschläger in collaboration with composer Edmund Campion. Ensemble intercontemporain’s U.S. tour is sponsored by the City of Paris and the French Institute. Additional support is provided by the FACE Foundation Contemporary Music Fund. This performance is made possible, in part, by Patron Sponsor Ross Armstrong, in memory of Jonas (Jay) Stern. Hamburg Steinway piano provided by Steinway & Sons of San Francisco. Cal Performances’ – season is sponsored by Wells Fargo. PLAYBILL ORCHESTRA ROSTER ENSEMBLE INTERCONTEMPORAIN Emmanuelle Ophèle flute, bass flute Didier Pateau oboe Philippe Grauvogel oboe Jérôme Comte clarinet Alain
    [Show full text]
  • Boulez's Improvisation III Sur Mallarmé Erling E
    Playing with transformations: Boulez’s Improvisation III sur Mallarmé Erling E. Guldbrandsen I have never been quite convinced by the way the story of ‘high modernism’ has generally been told. More often than not, it has been a saga of radical ruptures and new starts—a ‘progress narrative’ involving limitless constructivism and the increasing rationalisation of musical language and compositional technique. In short, the simplest historiographical tropes seem to have prevailed. Moreover, technical analyses of the music in question often fail to account for the actual listening experience. The hegemonic language of structural analysis and modernist historiography from the last fifty-odd years falls short of the musical imagery, poetic sensuality, and strangeness present in works by Messiaen, Stockhausen, Ligeti, Xenakis, Berio, Saariaho, or Sciarrino. Even though the general textbook image of European post-World War II modernism as a predominantly rationalist era of strictly ‘logical’ composition is gradually changing, it appears to be changing rather slowly. During the last six decades, mainstream structural analyses of music by Pierre Boulez (b. 1925)—a prominent figure in postwar modernism and a co-founder of so-called ‘total’ serialist composition—seem to have taken for granted a certain notion of serialism that emphasises the need for structural unity and rational compositional control. To a surprising extent—aside from certain valuable exceptions in more recent decades—the general analytical literature on Boulez’s music resorted to
    [Show full text]
  • Boulez, Structures La, Series, Total Serialism, Twelve-Tone, Matrix, Cube
    RESEARCH NOTES 339 cyclical; duration and intensity are linear (and in this piece, they are ordered according to the ORMAP); and articulation is neither cyclical nor linear. The four elements correspond to a single series, so, for example, the third entry in the series corre­ Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/mts/article/30/2/339/1000085 by guest on 27 September 2021 A Tesseract in Boulez's Structures la sponds to order position 2, PC 9, a dotted-sixteenth duration, pianissimo, and staccato. Therefore, a twelve-tone matrix con­ PAUL LOMBARDI AND MICHAEL WESTER structed from this series can be populated with PCs, durations, dynamics, or articulations. Keywords: Boulez, Structures la, series, total serialism, Consider the twelve-tone matrices shown in Example 2. twelve-tone, matrix, cube, tesseract, hypercube, dimension, The T -matrix at the top of Example 2 has the prime form of symmetry, antisymmetry. the series in the top row, and the inverted form of the series in the left column. The I -matrix in the lower left of Example 2 has the prime form of the series in both the top row and left column, and likewise, the I -matrix in the lower right of In this article, we examine the multidimensionality that satu­ Example 2 has the inverted form of the series in both the top rates the serial design of Boulez's Structures 1 a (1952) . To do row and left column. For the duration of this paper, we will this, we will find it convenient to combine the various order­ refer to these matrices by indicating their dimensions as P ings of the series given in the piece into a single multidimen­ and!or I: the T -matrix will be referred to as P X I, the I -ma­ sional serial object that will take on the aspect of a hypercube.
    [Show full text]
  • Rationalizing Culture : IRCAM, Boulez, and the Institutionalization of the Musical Avant-Garde / Georgina Born, P
    IRCAM, Boulez, and the Institutionalization of the CULTUR Musical Avant-Garde GEORGINA RATIONALIZING BORN Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2019 with funding from Kahle/Austin Foundation https://archive.org/details/rationalizingculOOOOborn Rationalizing Culture Rationalizing Culture IRC AM, Boulez, and the Institutionalization of the Musical Avant-Garde w II Georgina Born UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS Berkeley • Los Angeles • London This book is a print-on-demand volume. It is manufactured using toner in place of ink. Type and images may be less sharp than the same material seen in traditionally printed University of California Press editions. University of California Press Berkeley and Los Angeles, California University of California Press, Ltd. London, England © 1995 by The Regents of the University of California Born, Georgina, 1955 — Rationalizing culture : IRCAM, Boulez, and the Institutionalization of the Musical Avant-Garde / Georgina Born, p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-510-08507-8 (alk. paper) IRCAM (Research institute : France) 2. Avant- garde (Music) —Social aspects. 3. Research institutes —France— Anthropological aspects. 4. Boulez, Pierre, 1925-Influence. I. Title. ML32.F82I745 1994 3o6.4'84 — ddo 93-39386 CIP MN Printed in the United States of America The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences — Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984. © For my parents, Andrew, and Irma Modern art as an art of tyrannizing —A coarse and strongly defined logic of delineation; motifs simplified to the point of formulas; the formula tyrannizes. Within the delineations a wild multiplicity, an overwhelming mass, before which the senses become confused; brutality in color, material, desires.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Form Pierre Boulez, 1927–2016
    Open form Pierre Boulez, 1927–2016 The death of Pierre Boulez came as a gentle shock to those for whom he is a figure of colossal importance in the postwar musical world. Pierre Boulez: Composer, Conductor, Enigma, the title of Joan Peyser’s 1976 book, does only partial justice to a musician whose contribution was truly much, much more; by times essayist, theoretician, critic, polemicist, builder of institutions, organizer of events, teacher and professor at the Collège de France. The key moments of Boulez’s musical education in the mid-1940s are well known: that he arrived in Paris from Montbrison in the autumn of 1943 to become a musician; that he studied counterpoint with Honegger’s wife, Andrée Vaurabourg, until 1945; that he was a member of Messiaen’s harmony class in 1944–5, graduating with a first prize in harmony; that he attended classes with René Leibowitz in 1945–6 in which the elder composer conducted detailed analyses of works by the Second Viennese composers; that he broke with Leibowitz in 1946 and, finally, that he worked with the Renaud–Barrault theatre company as musical director betweeen 1946 and 1956. It is the story of a deeply determined young musician who mastered his craft in a surprisingly short time to develop into a composer capable of producing works like his First Sonata for Piano and his Sonatine for flute and piano (1946) when he was still only twenty-one years of age. Of course the story is not quite so straightforward. His compositional trajectory was shaped primarily by the work of Messiaen, Schoenberg, Webern, Stravinsky, Debussy and Varèse, while composers of the younger generation such as John Cage and Karlheinz Stockhausen also contributed to his development as a unique creative voice.
    [Show full text]
  • 32 Von Simon Tönies Anfang Der 1950Er-Jahre
    Spiel mit dem Zufall Das Zahlenquadrat in Pierre Boulez’ Polyphonie X von Simon Tönies Anfang der 1950er-Jahre experimentiert Pierre Boulez mit Varianten seri- eller Organisation, die sowohl auf Tonhöhen- als auch Dauernebene zwi- schen einem punktuellen Prinzip und einem Gruppenprinzip pendelten. Im Aufsatz «Éventuellement …» erörtert Boulez das Klavierstück Struc- tures Ia, in dem beide Ebenen punktuell behandelt werden.1 Im Polyphonie- Projekt2 bestimmen dagegen nicht einzelne Notenwerte, sondern Zusam- menschlüsse, rhythmische Zellen, die Dauernorganisation. Die Gruppentechnik der Rhythmuszellen erlaubt ein höheres Maß an Flexibilität – schon in Structures Ib findet Boulez zu ihr zurück, im Marteau sans maître greift das Prinzip auch auf die Tonhöhenorganisation über. In «Éventuellement …» betont Boulez dagegen noch die Autonomie der Zellenarbeit, «où le rythme a une structure sérielle, certes, mais fondée exclusivement sur des principes de variation rythmique, et indépendants de la structure des hauteurs».3 Als Beispiel nennt er die sieben rhythmi- schen Basiszellen der Polyphonies und ihre Transformationsarten. Was ge- nau unter «structure sérielle» zu verstehen ist und wie trotz der hervor- gehobenen Unabhängigkeit der Materialschichten in Polyphonie X bereits die Idee einer vermittelnden Instanz durchscheint, lässt sich anhand des Zahlenquadrats nachvollziehen, das Boulez für die Organisation der Trans- formationsarten angefertigt hat. Für jede der sieben Rhythmus-Basiszellen entwirft Boulez einen Kata- log aus Variationen, unterteilt in sieben Transformationsarten, die er in den Ideenskizzen erstmals definiert.4 Boulez erläutert diese Transformations- 1 Pierre Boulez, «Éventuellement …» [1952], in: Relevés d’apprenti, hrsg. von Paule Thévenin, Paris: Seuil 1966, S. 147–82, hier S. 158–59. 2 Drei Sätze von Polyphonie X pour 18 instruments wurden am 6.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Form and Structure in Pierre Boulez's Pli Selon Pli
    Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 8-26-2015 12:00 AM A Study of Form and Structure in Pierre Boulez's Pli selon Pli Emily J. Adamowicz The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Dr. Catherine Nolan The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in Music A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Doctor of Philosophy © Emily J. Adamowicz 2015 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Part of the Music Theory Commons Recommended Citation Adamowicz, Emily J., "A Study of Form and Structure in Pierre Boulez's Pli selon Pli" (2015). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 3133. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/3133 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! A!Study!of!Form!and!Structure!in!Pierre!Boulez’s!Pli$selon$Pli$ $ (Thesis!format:!Monograph)! ! ! ! by! ! ! ! ! Emily!J.!Adamowicz! ! ! ! Graduate!Program!in!Music! ! ! A!thesis!submitted!in!partial!fulfilment! of!the!requirements!for!the!degree!of!! Doctor!of!Philosophy! ! ! The!School!of!Graduate!and!Postdoctoral!Studies! Western!University! London,!Ontario,!Canada! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ©!Emily!J.!Adamowicz,!2015! Abstract In his 1963 treatise, Penser la musique aujourd’hui, Pierre Boulez proposes that there should
    [Show full text]
  • ZKM GLOBALE Dafx 2015 Musicacoustica-Beijing 2015
    News ZKM GLOBALE tion with the 4DSOUND spatial non-linear distortion effects pedals. sound group, showcased immersive The conference organizers awarded GLOBALE, a festival on contem- sonic works for 16 omnidirectional the best paper prize to Roman Geb- porary musical instruments and loudspeaker columns, composed by hardt, Matthew Davies, and Bernhard interfaces, took place 5–7 February 15 artists throughout the three days Seeber for their paper “Harmonic 2016 in Karlsruhe, Germany, hosted of the festival. Mixing Based on Roughness and by Zentrum fur¨ Kunst und Medien- Web: zkm.de/event/2016/02 Pitch Commonality.” The poster ses- technologie Karlsruhe (ZKM). The /globale-performing-sound-playing sions included work on estimating festival included five concerts and -technology the amount of rhythmic swing in a three sessions of research presen- musical recording, a new method for tations, whose stated goal was the determining the optimal pitch shift critical examination of contempo- DAFx 2015 for harmonic mixing of two audio rary musical instruments and the recordings, and GPU-based acoustic simulation, among others. reciprocal influence of music and The 18th International Conference on Web: www.ntnu.edu/web/dafx15 technology. GLOBALE was part of Digital Audio Effects (DAFx) was held /dafx15 the ongoing Design, Development, 30 November–3 December 2015 in and Dissemination of New Musical Trondheim, Norway, encompassing Instruments (3DMIN) project, a joint four days of research presentations, research initiative between Techni- tutorials, and a concert. DAFx 2015 MusicAcoustica-Beijing 2015 cal University of Berlin and Berlin was co-hosted by the Department of University of the Arts in Germany. Electronics and Telecommunications The 22nd annual MusicAcoustica- The event’s research symposium and the Department of Music’s Music Beijing electroacoustic music festival covered improvisational strategies Technology group at the Norwegian was held 26–31 October 2015.
    [Show full text]