DOCSLIB.ORG

Tpj201691.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tpj201691.Pdf OPEN The Pharmacogenomics Journal (2018) 18, 23–28 www.nature.com/tpj ORIGINAL ARTICLE Epigenomics alternations and dynamic transcriptional changes in responses to 5-fluorouracil stimulation reveal mechanisms of acquired drug resistance of colorectal cancer cells Y Shen1,3, M Tong1,3, Q Liang1, Y Guo2, HQ Sun1, W Zheng1,LAo1, Z Guo1 and F She1 A drug-induced resistant cancer cell is different from its parent cell in transcriptional response to drug treatment. The distinct transcriptional response pattern of a drug-induced resistant cancer cell to drug treatment might be introduced by acquired DNA methylation aberration in the cell exposing to sustained drug stimulation. In this study, we performed both transcriptional and DNA methylation profiles of the HCT-8 wild-type cells (HCT-8/WT) for human colorectal cancer (CRC) and the 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)- induced resistant cells (HCT-8/5-FU) after treatment with 5-FU for 0, 24 and 48 h. Integrated analysis of transcriptional and DNA methylation profiles showed that genes with promoter hypermethylation and concordant expression silencing in the HCT-8/5-FU cells are mainly involved in pathways of pyrimidine metabolism and drug metabolism-cytochrome P450. Transcriptional analysis confirmed that genes with transcriptional differences between a drug-induced resistant cell and its parent cell after drug treatment for a certain time, rather than their primary transcriptional differences, are more likely to be involved in drug resistance. Specifically, transcriptional differences between the drug-induced resistant cells and parental cells after drug treatment for 24 h were significantly consistent with the differentially expressed genes (termed as CRG5-FU) between the tissues of nonresponders and responders of CRCs to 5-FU-based therapy and the consistence increased after drug treatment for 48 h (binomial test, P-value = 1.88E − 06). This study reveals a major epigenetic mechanism inducing the HCT-8/WT cells to acquire resistance to 5-FU and suggests an appropriate time interval (24–48 h) of 5-FU exposure for identifying clinically relevant drug resistance signatures from drug-induced resistant cell models. The Pharmacogenomics Journal (2018) 18, 23–28; doi:10.1038/tpj.2016.91; published online 3 January 2017 INTRODUCTION cells synchronously exposing to drug for a certain time, are more Colon and rectal cancer (CRC) is a fatal cancer with low overall likely to be involved in drug resistance. This result suggests a 5-year survival rate.1 Until now, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based novel strategy to identify clinically relevant drug resistance genes 10 chemotherapy is the first-line clinical treatment of CRC,2 but the from drug-induced resistant cell models. However, the cells response rate is only ∼ 50%,3 and most of patients acquire analyzed in our previous study were treated with 5-FU for only 6, resistance during chemotherapy.4,5,6 The process of a tumor 12 and 24 h. Thus, it is necessary to prolong the time of drug treatment to investigate the characteristics of sustained acquiring drug resistance during chemotherapy could be 13,14 mimicked partially by the common process of establishing drug- responses. Another problem remains to be addressed is to explain the underlying molecular mechanism for the acquired resistant cells by exposing parental cells to drug treatment in vitro distinct transcriptional response characteristics of a drug-induced over a period of time. Therefore, it should be helpful to explore resistant cancer cell to drug treatment. It has been reported that drug-induced resistant cell models to understand both innate and aberrant DNA hypermethylation within gene promoters and acquired drug resistance mechanisms of cancers. consequent gene silencing might play a major role in generating Based on a drug-induced resistant cell model, researchers often 15–17 fi drug-resistant phenotypes. Therefore, we could assume that rst identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the distinct transcriptional response characteristics of a drug- parental and resistant cells, termed basally deregulated (BD) induced resistant cancer cell to drug treatment could be 7–9 fi genes, and de ned these DEGs as drug resistance genes. introduced by acquired DNA methylation aberration in the cell However, it has been recognized that most of these BD genes exposing to sustained drug stimulation. might simply represent drug-induced transcriptional changes In this work, we performed both transcriptional and DNA 10–12 irrelevant to drug resistance. Recently, taking the DEGs methylational profiles of HCT-8 wild type cells (HCT-8/WT) for between the nonresponders and responders of CRC patients human CRC and its 5-FU-induced resistant cell line (HCT-8/5-FU). receiving 5-FU-based therapy (termed CRG5-FU) as reference, we We first uncovered that the genes with both promoter hyper- reported that inducible difference (ID) genes, which represent the methylation and expression silencing during 5-FU treatment are transcriptional differences between resistant cells and parental mainly involved in pathways of pyrimidine metabolism and drug 1Department of Bioinformatics, Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China and 2Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Basic Medicine Sciences, Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China. Correspondence: Professor Z Guo or Professor F She, Department of Bioinformatic, Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350108, China. E-mail: [email protected] or [email protected] 3These two authors contributed equally to this work. Received 20 July 2016; revised 6 November 2016; accepted 14 November 2016; published online 3 January 2017 Acquired resistance mechanism of 5-fluorouracil Y Shen et al 24 metabolism-cytochrome P450 that might be a major epigenetic CA 92122, USA). A total amount of 1 mg genomic DNA from one mechanism of a cancer cell to acquire 5FU resistance. Then, we experiment was bisulfite modified using the EZ DNA Methylation Kit (Zymo confirmed that ID genes detected at the 24 h time point were Research, Irvine, CA, USA). In all, 200 ng of converted DNA was further significantly consistent with CRG and the consistency became processed to run BeadArrays according to the manufacturer’s instructions. 5-FU fl more significant after drug treatment for 48 h (binomial test, Each locus is represented by uorescent signals from two bead types corresponding to the methylated (M) and unmethylated (U) alleles, P-value = 1.88E − 06). This result suggested an appropriate time – respectively. interval (24 48 h) of drug treatment for identifying genes related Methylation and expression profiling data were available in NCBI to drug resistance. (National Center for Biotechnology Information) Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO accession number: GSE81008). MATERIALS AND METHODS Data processing Cell lines and reagents Gene expression profiling data were preprocessed with the Robust HCT-8/WT and HCT-8/5-FU cells were purchased from Keygentec (Nanjing, Microarray Average algorithm. Each probe set ID was mapped to its China). Complete growth medium RPMI-1640 that contains 10% fetal calf Entrez gene ID with the corresponding custom CDF files. If multiple probe – serum and 1% penicillin streptomycin solution was used for cell culture. Both sets were mapped to the same gene, the expression value for the gene fi cell lines were maintained at 37 °C in a humidi ed atmosphere containing was defined as the arithmetic mean of the values of the multiple probe 5% CO . MTT assay was performed to determine the 5-FU resistance in both 2 sets (on the log2 scale). of HCT-8/WT and HCT-8/5-FU cell lines. 5-FU and penicillin–streptomycin The raw signals of unmethylated (U) and methylated (M) bead types solution (100 × ) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Corp. St. Louis, MO, USA. were background corrected and computed into β-values using the RPMI-1640 and fetal calf serum were purchased from Thermo Fisher GenomeStudio software Methylation Module (5200 Illumina Way, San Scientific, 168 Third Avenue, Waltham, MA, USA. Cell culture plates and other Diego, CA 92122, USA). A total of 25 943 CpG loci located within the consumables were purchased from Corning and Axygen, 836 North Street, proximal promoter regions of the transcription start sites of 14 109 genes Building 300 Suite 3401, Tewksbury, MA 01876, USA. were used as background CpG loci in this study. The β-value was used to estimate the methylation level of the CpG locus using the ratio of Gene expression and methylation profiling intensities between methylated and unmethylated alleles: ðÞ; HCT-8/WT and HCT-8/5-FU cells were cultured in 5-FU free medium for β ¼ max M 0 48 h, and then both cell lines were transferred to the medium for 0, 24 and ðmaxðÞþM; 0 maxðÞþU; 0 100Þ 48 h with HCT-8/WT half-maximal inhibitory concentration doses of 5-FU (Figure 1). Untreated cells (0 h) and treated cells (24 and 48 h) were subject to extract RNA to be subjected to RNA microarray analysis. Total RNA was isolated from three independent experiments using TRizol (Thermofisher) Concordance score ’ according to the manufacturer s instructions. Before the following For DEGs from two independent data sets sharing k DEGs, of which s genes experiments, total RNA was quality controlled by formaldehyde denatured have the same up- or down-regulation directions between the treated cell – agarose gel electrophoresis and ultraviolet visible spectrophotometer. type and the control cell type, the concordance score was calculated as s/k. Total RNA (100 ng) from one experiment was sent to commercial kits for If k genes have both methylation and expression changes, among which s complementary DNA synthesis, complementary RNA synthesis, antisense genes are hypermethylated (or hypomethylated) and correspondingly RNA synthesis and its fragmentation (1792, Ambion, Thermo Fisher downregulated (or upregulated), then the concordance score was Scientific, 168 Third Avenue, Waltham, MA, USA).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mechanisms and Strategies to Overcome Multiple Drug Resistance in Cancer
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector FEBS Letters 580 (2006) 2903–2909 Minireview Mechanisms and strategies to overcome multiple drug resistance in cancer Tomris Ozben* Akdeniz University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry, 07070 Antalya, Turkey Received 30 January 2006; accepted 9 February 2006 Available online 17 February 2006 Edited by Horst Feldmann The cytotoxic drugs that are most frequently associated with Abstract One of the major problems in chemotherapy is multi- drug resistance (MDR) against anticancer drugs. ATP-binding MDR are hydrophobic, amphipathic natural products, such as cassette (ABC) transporters are a family of proteins that medi- the taxanes (paclitaxel and docetaxel), vinca alkaloids (vinorel- ate MDR via ATP-dependent drug efflux pumps. Many MDR bine, vincristine, and vinblastine), anthracyclines (doxorubicin, inhibitors have been identified, but none of them have been pro- daunorubicin, and epirubicin), epipodophyllotoxins (etoposide ven clinically useful without side effects. Efforts continue to dis- and teniposide), antimetabolites (methorexate, fluorouracil, cover not toxic MDR inhibitors which lack pharmacokinetic cytosar, 5-azacytosine, 6-mercaptopurine, and gemcitabine) interactions with anticancer drugs. Novel approaches have also topotecan, dactinomycin, and mitomycin C [4,6–8]. been designed to inhibit or circumvent MDR. In this review, Overexpression of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters the structure and function of ABC transporters and development has been shown to be responsible for MDR [5]. Therefore eluci- of MDR inhibitors are described briefly including various ap- dation of the structure and function for each ABC transporter is proaches to suppress MDR mechanisms.
    [Show full text]
  • Antibiotic Resistance: from the Bench to Patients
    antibiotics Editorial Antibiotic Resistance: From the Bench to Patients Márió Gajdács 1,* and Fernando Albericio 2,3 1 Department of Pharmacodynamics and Biopharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Szeged, Dóm tér 10., 6720 Szeged, Hungary 2 School of Chemistry, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4001, South Africa 3 Department of Organic Chemistry, University of Barcelona, CIBER-BBN, 08028 Barcelona, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +36-62-341-330 Received: 20 August 2019; Accepted: 26 August 2019; Published: 27 August 2019 The discovery and subsequent clinical introduction of antibiotics is one of the most important game-changers in the history of medicine [1]. These drugs have saved millions of lives from infections that would previously have been fatal, and later, they allowed for the introduction of surgical interventions, organ transplantation, care of premature infants, and cancer chemotherapy [2]. Nevertheless, the therapy of bacterial infections is becoming less and less straightforward due to the emergence of multidrug resistance (MDR) in these pathogens [3]. Direct consequences of antibiotic resistance include delays in the onset of the appropriate (effective) antimicrobial therapy, the need to use older, more toxic antibiotics (e.g., colistin) with a disadvantageous side-effect profile, longer hospital stays, and an increasing burden on the healthcare infrastructure; overall, a decrease in the quality-of-life (QoL) and an increase in the mortality rate of the affected patients [4,5]. To highlight the severity of the issue, several international declarations have been published to call governments around the globe to take action on antimicrobial resistance [6–9]. Since the 1980s, pharmaceutical companies have slowly turned away from antimicrobial research and towards the drug therapy of chronic non-communicable diseases [10,11].
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacogenetic Testing: a Tool for Personalized Drug Therapy Optimization
    pharmaceutics Review Pharmacogenetic Testing: A Tool for Personalized Drug Therapy Optimization Kristina A. Malsagova 1,* , Tatyana V. Butkova 1 , Arthur T. Kopylov 1 , Alexander A. Izotov 1, Natalia V. Potoldykova 2, Dmitry V. Enikeev 2, Vagarshak Grigoryan 2, Alexander Tarasov 3, Alexander A. Stepanov 1 and Anna L. Kaysheva 1 1 Biobanking Group, Branch of Institute of Biomedical Chemistry “Scientific and Education Center”, 109028 Moscow, Russia; [email protected] (T.V.B.); [email protected] (A.T.K.); [email protected] (A.A.I.); [email protected] (A.A.S.); [email protected] (A.L.K.) 2 Institute of Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, 119992 Moscow, Russia; [email protected] (N.V.P.); [email protected] (D.V.E.); [email protected] (V.G.) 3 Institute of Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, Sechenov University, 119992 Moscow, Russia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +7-499-764-9878 Received: 2 November 2020; Accepted: 17 December 2020; Published: 19 December 2020 Abstract: Pharmacogenomics is a study of how the genome background is associated with drug resistance and how therapy strategy can be modified for a certain person to achieve benefit. The pharmacogenomics (PGx) testing becomes of great opportunity for physicians to make the proper decision regarding each non-trivial patient that does not respond to therapy. Although pharmacogenomics has become of growing interest to the healthcare market during the past five to ten years the exact mechanisms linking the genetic polymorphisms and observable responses to drug therapy are not always clear. Therefore, the success of PGx testing depends on the physician’s ability to understand the obtained results in a standardized way for each particular patient.
    [Show full text]
  • Antibiotic Resistance in Plant-Pathogenic Bacteria
    PY56CH08-Sundin ARI 23 May 2018 12:16 Annual Review of Phytopathology Antibiotic Resistance in Plant-Pathogenic Bacteria George W. Sundin1 and Nian Wang2 1Department of Plant, Soil, and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA; email: [email protected] 2Citrus Research and Education Center, Department of Microbiology and Cell Science, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Lake Alfred, Florida 33850, USA Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2018. 56:8.1–8.20 Keywords The Annual Review of Phytopathology is online at kasugamycin, oxytetracycline, streptomycin, resistome phyto.annualreviews.org https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-080417- Abstract 045946 Antibiotics have been used for the management of relatively few bacterial Copyright c 2018 by Annual Reviews. plant diseases and are largely restricted to high-value fruit crops because of Access provided by INSEAD on 06/01/18. For personal use only. All rights reserved the expense involved. Antibiotic resistance in plant-pathogenic bacteria has Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2018.56. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org become a problem in pathosystems where these antibiotics have been used for many years. Where the genetic basis for resistance has been examined, antibiotic resistance in plant pathogens has most often evolved through the acquisition of a resistance determinant via horizontal gene transfer. For ex- ample, the strAB streptomycin-resistance genes occur in Erwinia amylovora, Pseudomonas syringae,andXanthomonas campestris, and these genes have pre- sumably been acquired from nonpathogenic epiphytic bacteria colocated on plant hosts under antibiotic selection. We currently lack knowledge of the effect of the microbiome of commensal organisms on the potential of plant pathogens to evolve antibiotic resistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Socioeconomic Factors Associated with Antimicrobial Resistance Of
    01 Pan American Journal Original research of Public Health 02 03 04 05 06 Socioeconomic factors associated with antimicrobial 07 08 resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 09 10 Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli in Chilean 11 12 hospitals (2008–2017) 13 14 15 Kasim Allel,1 Patricia García,2 Jaime Labarca,3 José M. Munita,4 Magdalena Rendic,5 Grupo 16 6 5 17 Colaborativo de Resistencia Bacteriana, and Eduardo A. Undurraga 18 19 20 21 Suggested citation Allel K, García P, Labarca J, Munita JM, Rendic M; Grupo Colaborativo de Resistencia Bacteriana; et al. Socioeconomic fac- 22 tors associated with antimicrobial resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli in 23 Chilean hospitals (2008–2017). Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2020;44:e30. https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2020.30 24 25 26 27 ABSTRACT Objective. To identify socioeconomic factors associated with antimicrobial resistance of Pseudomonas aeru- 28 ginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli in Chilean hospitals (2008–2017). 29 Methods. We reviewed the scientific literature on socioeconomic factors associated with the emergence and 30 dissemination of antimicrobial resistance. Using multivariate regression, we tested findings from the literature drawing from a longitudinal dataset on antimicrobial resistance from 41 major private and public hospitals and 31 a nationally representative household survey in Chile (2008–2017). We estimated resistance rates for three pri- 32 ority antibiotic–bacterium pairs, as defined by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; 33 i.e., imipenem and meropenem resistant P. aeruginosa, cloxacillin resistant S. aureus, and cefotaxime and 34 ciprofloxacin resistant E. coli. 35 Results.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacogenomics to Predict Tumor Therapy Response: a Focus on ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters and Cytochromes P450
    Journal of Personalized Medicine Review Pharmacogenomics to Predict Tumor Therapy Response: A Focus on ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters and Cytochromes P450 Viktor Hlaváˇc 1,2,* , Petr Holý 1,2,3 and Pavel Souˇcek 1,2 1 Toxicogenomics Unit, National Institute of Public Health, 100 00 Prague, Czech Republic; [email protected] (P.H.); [email protected] (P.S.) 2 Laboratory of Pharmacogenomics, Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, 306 05 Pilsen, Czech Republic 3 Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 100 00 Prague, Czech Republic * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +420-267082681; Fax: +420-267311236 Received: 31 July 2020; Accepted: 26 August 2020; Published: 28 August 2020 Abstract: Pharmacogenomics is an evolving tool of precision medicine. Recently,due to the introduction of next-generation sequencing and projects generating “Big Data”, a plethora of new genetic variants in pharmacogenes have been discovered. Cancer resistance is a major complication often preventing successful anticancer treatments. Pharmacogenomics of both somatic mutations in tumor cells and germline variants may help optimize targeted treatments and improve the response to conventional oncological therapy. In addition, integrative approaches combining copy number variations and long noncoding RNA profiling with germline and somatic variations seem to be a promising approach as well. In pharmacology, expression and enzyme activity are traditionally the more studied aspects of ATP-binding cassette transporters and cytochromes P450. In this review, we briefly introduce the field of pharmacogenomics and the advancements driven by next-generation sequencing and outline the possible roles of genetic variation in the two large pharmacogene superfamilies.
    [Show full text]
  • Antimicrobial Drug Resistance: “Prediction Is Very Difficult, Especially About the Future”1 Patrice Courvalin*
    Antimicrobial Drug Resistance: “Prediction Is Very Difficult, Especially about the Future”1 Patrice Courvalin* Evolution of bacteria towards resistance to antimicro- these drugs; a notion reinforced by the observation that bial drugs, including multidrug resistance, is unavoidable resistance is slowly reversible (3,4). because it represents a particular aspect of the general Therefore, attempting to predict the future of the rela- evolution of bacteria that is unstoppable. Therefore, the tionship between antimicrobial drugs and bacteria is con- only means of dealing with this situation is to delay the ceptually challenging and potentially useful. For the sake emergence and subsequent dissemination of resistant bac- teria or resistance genes. Resistance to antimicrobial drugs of convenience, the examples will be taken mainly from in bacteria can result from mutations in housekeeping the work carried out in the author’s laboratory, although structural or regulatory genes. Alternatively, resistance can numerous other examples can be found in the literature. result from the horizontal acquisition of foreign genetic The clinically relevant predictable resistance types are information. The 2 phenomena are not mutually exclusive listed in the Table. Although they have not yet been report- and can be associated in the emergence and more efficient ed, they may exist in nature; their apparent absence is, at spread of resistance. This review discusses the predictable least for some of them, rather surprising. For example, future of the relationship between antimicrobial drugs and streptococci, including pneumococci and groups A, C, and bacteria. G, can easily acquire in vitro conjugative plasmids from enterococci and stably maintain and phenotypically ver the last 60 years, bacteria and, in particular, those express them (5).
    [Show full text]
  • Multiple Drug Resistance: a Fast-Growing Threat
    Review Article ISSN: 2574 -1241 DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2019.21.003572 Multiple Drug Resistance: A Fast-Growing Threat Eremwanarue Aibuedefe Osagie1,2* and Shittu Hakeem Olalekan1 1Department of Plant Biology and Biotechnology, University of Benin, Nigeria 2Lahor Research Laboratories and Diagnostics Centre, Nigeria *Corresponding author: Eremwanarue Aibuedefe Osagie, Department of Plant Biology and Biotechnology, University of Benin, Nigeria ARTICLE INFO Abstract Received: September 03, 2019 The spread of antibiotic resistant bacteria is a growing problem and a public health Published: September 10, 2019 issue. Over the years, various genetic mechanisms concerned with antibiotic resistance have been identified to be natural and acquired resistance. The natural resistance Citation: Eremwanarue Aibuedefe Osag- ie, Shittu Hakeem Olalekan. Multiple Geneticinvolved Elements mutation [MGEs] via target such modification,as plasmid, transposon reduced permeability, and integrons efflux genetic system elements and Drug Resistance: A Fast-Growing Threat. on the other hand, acquired resistance via horizontal gene tranfer include Moblie Biomed J Sci & Tech Res 21(2)-2019. Integrons are widely distributed, especially in Gram-negative bacteria; they are carried BJSTR. MS.ID.003572. bythat Mobile can acquire, Genetic exchange, Elements and such express as plasmids, genes embeddedand transposons, within whichGene Cassettespromote [GC].their spread within bacterial communities and have been studied mainly in the clinical setting Keywords: Antibiotics; Multiple Drug for their involvement in antibiotic resistance, their role in the environment is now an Resistant Bacteria; Mobile Genetic increasing focus of attention. The aim of this review is to educate the populise about Element; Integrons Plasmid the mechanisms of multiple drug resistance bacteria isolates and the danger ahead if appropriate regulations are not put in place especially in developing country like Nigeria.
    [Show full text]
  • Gut Microbiota: a New Player in Regulating Immune- and Chemo-Therapy Efficacy Simone Anfossi1, George A
    Anfossi et al . Cancer Drug Resist 2020;3:356-70 Cancer DOI: 10.20517/cdr.2020.04 Drug Resistance Review Open Access Gut microbiota: a new player in regulating immune- and chemo-therapy efficacy Simone Anfossi1, George A. Calin1,2 1Department of Experimental Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77054, USA. 2Center for RNA Interference and Non-coding RNAs, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77054, USA. Correspondence to: Prof. George A. Calin, Department of Experimental Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77054, USA. E-mail: [email protected]; Simone Anfossi, Department of Experimental Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77054, USA. E-mail: [email protected] How to cite this article: Anfossi S, Calin GA. Gut microbiota: a new player in regulating immune- and chemo-therapy efficacy. Cancer Drug Resist 2020;3:356-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/cdr.2020.04 Received: 7 Jan 2020 First Decision: 17 Feb 2020 Revised: 22 Feb 2020 Accepted: 5 Mar 2020 Available online: 21 Mar 2020 Science Editor: Dario Marchetti Copy Editor: Jing-Wen Zhang Production Editor: Tian Zhang Abstract Development of drug resistance represents the major cause of cancer therapy failure, determines disease progression and results in poor prognosis for cancer patients. Different mechanisms are responsible for drug resistance. Intrinsic genetic modifications of cancer cells induce the alteration of expression of gene controlling specific pathways that regulate drug resistance: drug transport and metabolism; alteration of drug targets; DNA damage repair; and deregulation of apoptosis, autophagy, and pro-survival signaling.
    [Show full text]
  • Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the United States, 2019
    ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE THREATS IN THE UNITED STATES 2019 Revised Dec. 2019 This report is dedicated to the 48,700 families who lose a loved one each year to antibiotic resistance or Clostridioides difficile, and the countless healthcare providers, public health experts, innovators, and others who are fighting back with everything they have. Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the United States, 2019 (2019 AR Threats Report) is a publication of the Antibiotic Resistance Coordination and Strategy Unit within the Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Suggested citation: CDC. Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the United States, 2019. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2019. Available online: The full 2019 AR Threats Report, including methods and appendices, is available online at www.cdc.gov/DrugResistance/Biggest-Threats.html. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15620/cdc:82532. ii U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Contents FOREWORD .............................................................................................................................................V EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ VII SECTION 1: THE THREAT OF ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE ....................................................................1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • NIAID's Antibiotic Resistance Research Framework: Current Status and Future Directions
    NIAID’S Antibiotic Resistance Research Framework: NIAID Current Status and Future Directions 2019 NIAID's Antibiotic Resistance Research Framework: Current Status and Future Directions Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 2 The Evolution and Accelerating Pace of Antibiotic Resistance (AR) ................................................2 The Antibiotic Development Pipeline ................................................................................................. 3 NIAID: Stimulating Research on AR .................................................................................................. 3 Basic Research................................................................................................................................. 3 Translational Research .................................................................................................................... 4 Clinical Research............................................................................................................................. 6 Research Resources ......................................................................................................................... 8 Partnerships Facilitate a Concerted Approach ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cancer Cell Metabolism Resulting in Multidrug Resistance to Chemotherapy and Possible Ways Out
    Journal of Cancer Prevention & Current Research Literature Review Open Access Cancer cell metabolism resulting in multidrug resistance to chemotherapy and possible ways out Abstract Volume 11 Issue 3 - 2020 Cancer has posed a great challenge to its victims all over the world. Researchers have Oluwaseun Fapohunda, Damilola Comfort developed several measures to combat this problem. However, it has been discovered that the major hindrance to breakthrough in this field is that cancer cells are able to resist Ajayi Department of Biochemistry, Adekunle Ajasin University, Nigeria treatment. A large pool of information was retrieved from several reputable articles most especially the recently published ones. In this review, some of the mechanisms adopted by Correspondence: Oluwaseun Fapohunda, Department of these cells to confer resistance to treatment will be discussed. These mechanisms include Biochemistry, Adekunle Ajasin University, Akungba Akoko, PMB drug efflux via ABC transporters, deregulation of cell death mechanisms, modification of 001, Nigeria, Tel +2347062998896, drug targets and repair of damaged DNA. The possible means to overcome this resistance Email are also reviewed. Received: May 24, 2020 | Published: June 22, 2020 Introduction to antitumor drugs using several mechanisms.6,17,18 MDR was first observed in bacteria as they became resistant to some antibiotics, but Reports have shown that cancer is a serious menace to human it has been seen in some other cases and also cancer.20 This resistance 1,2 life and health. Over the years,
    [Show full text]