DOCSLIB.ORG

P166 Route and Alternatives

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
P166 Route and Alternatives P166 Route and Alternatives Conservation-Important Fauna and Flora Walk-through Survey Report March 2015 Prepared for: Paul da Cruz Associate Royal HaskoningDHV PO Box 867, Gallo Manor 2052 Prepared by: ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC PO Box 57 White River 1240 Author: Duncan McKenzie P166 Walk-through survey (ECOREX) Feb 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 5 2 TERMS OF REFERENCE .............................................................................................................. 6 3 APPROACH AND METHODS ........................................................................................................ 6 4 STUDY AREA ................................................................................................................................. 8 5 METHODS .................................................................................................................................... 11 5.1 Assumptions, Limitations and Knowledge Gaps ................................................................... 12 5.1.1 Seasonality .................................................................................................................... 12 5.1.2 Overlooked Species ...................................................................................................... 12 5.1.3 Access ........................................................................................................................... 12 6 RESULTS ...................................................................................................................................... 13 6.1 Flora ...................................................................................................................................... 13 6.1.1 Msholozi Route .............................................................................................................. 19 6.1.2 Phumlani Alternative Route ........................................................................................... 20 6.1.3 White River Route ......................................................................................................... 21 6.1.4 White River Alternative Route ....................................................................................... 22 6.2 Fauna .................................................................................................................................... 28 7 CONCLUSION .............................................................................................................................. 33 8 RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................................. 35 9 REFERENCES .............................................................................................................................. 36 10 APPENDICES ........................................................................................................................... 38 10.1 Appendix 1: Co-ordinates and number of each plant species of conservation-importance recorded along the four routes surveyed .......................................................................................... 38 10.2 Appendix 2. Photographs of conservation-important fauna and flora confirmed along the routes .............................................................................................................................................. 52 1 ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC PO Box 57 White River 1240 (013) 750-1893 (083) 231-5632 [email protected] P166 Walk-through survey (ECOREX) Feb 2015 List of Tables Table 1 : Start and end points and length of each of the four portions surveyed ................................... 8 Table 2: Potentially occurring conservation-important plant species within the study area ................. 14 Table 3: Summary of plant species located during fieldwork ................................................................ 17 Table 4: Summary of plant species located during fieldwork in the Msholozi Route ............................ 20 Table 5: Summary of plant species located during fieldwork in the Phumlani Alternative Route ......... 21 Table 6: Summary of plant species located during fieldwork in the White River Route ....................... 22 Table 7: Summary of plant species located during fieldwork in the White River Alternative Route ..... 22 Table 8: Potentially occurring conservation-important fauna species within the proposed P166 routes ............................................................................................................................................... 29 Table 9: Confirmed conservation-important fauna species recorded within the proposed P166 routes ............................................................................................................................................... 32 List of Figures Figure 1: Map of the study area showing the localities of the four survey routes ................................. 10 Figure 2: Map showing the localities of all conservation-important flora and fauna along the Msholozi Route ..................................................................................................................................... 23 Figure 3: Map showing the localities of all conservation-important flora and fauna along the Phumlani Alternative Route ................................................................................................................... 24 Figure 4: Map showing the localities of all conservation-important flora and fauna along the White River Route ........................................................................................................................... 25 Figure 5: Map showing the localities of Aloe simii and Aloe kniphofioides plants as well as the recommended 200m no development buffer proposed for those two species ..................... 26 Figure 6: Map showing the localities of all conservation-important flora and fauna along the White River Alternative Route ......................................................................................................... 27 2 ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC PO Box 57 White River 1240 (013) 750-1893 (083) 231-5632 [email protected] P166 Walk-through survey (ECOREX) Feb 2015 Abbreviations AOO Area of Occupancy CBA Critical Biodiversity Area DEAT Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism Mamsl Metres Above Mean Sea Level MBSP Mpumalanga Biodiversity Sector Plan MNCA Mpumalanga Nature Conservation Act (No. 10 of 1998) MTPA Mpumalanga Tourism and Parks Agency NEMBA ToPS National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act Threatened or Protected Species (No. 10 of 2004) NFA National Forests Act (No. 30 of 1998) PRECIS National Herbarium Pretoria Computerised Information System SANBI South African National Biodiversity Institute Terminology Biodiversity The structural, functional and compositional attributes of an area, ranging from genes to landscapes. Degraded An ecosystem that is in a poor ecological state, usually through impacts such as invasion by alien plants, severe overgrazing, poor burning regimes, etc. These systems still contain a moderate proportion of indigenous flora. Geophyte Plants that produce their growth points from organs stored below the ground, an adaption to survive frost, drought and / or fire. Transformed Transformed ecosystems are no longer natural and contain little or no indigenous flora. Examples include agricultural lands, plantations, urban areas, etc. Acknowledgements Linda McKenzie of Digital Earth GIS Consulting compiled all the maps in this report. 3 ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC PO Box 57 White River 1240 (013) 750-1893 (083) 231-5632 [email protected] P166 Walk-through survey (ECOREX) Feb 2015 Declaration of Independence We declare that we have been appointed as independent consulting ecologists with no affiliation with or vested financial interests in the proponent, other than for work performed under the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2010. We have no conflicting interests in the undertaking of this activity and have no interests in secondary developments resulting from the authorisation of this project. Remuneration for our services by the proponent is not linked to approval by any decision-making authority responsible for authorising this development. W.L.McCleland 24 February 2015 D.R. McKenzie 24 February 2015 4 ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC PO Box 57 White River 1240 (013) 750-1893 (083) 231-5632 [email protected] P166 Walk-through survey (ECOREX) Feb 2015 1 INTRODUCTION ECOREX Consulting Ecologists was appointed by Paul da Cruz of Royal HaskoningDHV to conduct a walk-through survey on four routes for the proposed P166 by-pass road between Rocky Drift and White River, Mpumalanga Province. The survey was performed on recommendation from the MTPA as there are known populations and records of conservation-important plants and animals on or adjacent to the proposed routes. The study team was as follows: Duncan McKenzie – Field Ecologist. He has been involved in biodiversity assessments for ECOREX for seven years and countries of work experience include Lesotho, Swaziland, Mali, Mozambique, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Tanzania and Democratic Republic of the Congo. Duncan has previously worked as a Regional Coordinator for the Mondi Wetlands Project and lectures on many aspects of conservation in Nelspruit
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Generic and Subtribal Relationships in Neotropical Cymbidieae (Orchidaceae) Based on Matk/Ycf1 Plastid Data
    LANKESTERIANA 13(3): 375—392. 2014. I N V I T E D P A P E R* GENERIC AND SUBTRIBAL RELATIONSHIPS IN NEOTROPICAL CYMBIDIEAE (ORCHIDACEAE) BASED ON MATK/YCF1 PLASTID DATA W. MARK WHITTEN1,2, KURT M. NEUBIG1 & N. H. WILLIAMS1 1Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida Gainesville, FL 32611-7800 USA 2Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT. Relationships among all subtribes of Neotropical Cymbidieae (Orchidaceae) were estimated using combined matK/ycf1 plastid sequence data for 289 taxa. The matrix was analyzed using RAxML. Bootstrap (BS) analyses yield 100% BS support for all subtribes except Stanhopeinae (87%). Generic relationships within subtribes are highly resolved and are generally congruent with those presented in previous studies and as summarized in Genera Orchidacearum. Relationships among subtribes are largely unresolved. The Szlachetko generic classification of Maxillariinae is not supported. A new combination is made for Maxillaria cacaoensis J.T.Atwood in Camaridium. KEY WORDS: Orchidaceae, Cymbidieae, Maxillariinae, matK, ycf1, phylogenetics, Camaridium, Maxillaria cacaoensis, Vargasiella Cymbidieae include many of the showiest align nrITS sequences across the entire tribe was Neotropical epiphytic orchids and an unparalleled unrealistic due to high levels of sequence divergence, diversity in floral rewards and pollination systems. and instead to concentrate our efforts on assembling Many researchers have posed questions such as a larger plastid data set based on two regions (matK “How many times and when has male euglossine and ycf1) that are among the most variable plastid bee pollination evolved?”(Ramírez et al. 2011), or exon regions and can be aligned with minimal “How many times have oil-reward flowers evolved?” ambiguity across broad taxonomic spans.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Sector Plan for the Zululand District Municipality, Kwazulu-Natal
    EZEMVELO KZN WILDLIFE Biodiversity Sector Plan for the Zululand District Municipality, KwaZulu-Natal Technical Report February 2010 The Project Team Thorn-Ex cc (Environmental Services) PO Box 800, Hilton, 3245 Pietermaritzbur South Africa Tel: (033) 3431814 Fax: (033) 3431819 Mobile: 084 5014665 [email protected] Marita Thornhill (Project Management & Coordination) AFZELIA Environmental Consultants cc KwaZulu-Natal Western Cape PO Box 95 PO Box 3397 Hilton 3245 Cape Town 8000 Tel: 033 3432931/32 Tel: 072 3900686 Fax: 033 3432033 or Fax: 086 5132112 086 5170900 Mobile: 084 6756052 [email protected] [email protected] Wolfgang Kanz (Biodiversity Specialist Coordinator) John Richardson (GIS) Monde Nembula (Social Facilitation) Tim O’Connor & Associates P.O.Box 379 Hilton 3245 South Africa Tel/ Fax: 27-(0)33-3433491 [email protected] Tim O’Connor (Biodiversity Expert Advice) Zululand Biodiversity Sector Plan (February 2010) 1 Executive Summary The Biodiversity Act introduced several legislated planning tools to assist with the management and conservation of South Africa’s biological diversity. These include the declaration of “Bioregions” and the publication of “Bioregional Plans”. Bioregional plans are usually an output of a systematic spatial conservation assessment of a region. They identify areas of conservation priority, and constraints and opportunities for implementation of the plan. The precursor to a Bioregional Plan is a Biodiversity Sector Plan (BSP), which is the official reference for biodiversity priorities to be taken into account in land-use planning and decision-making by all sectors within the District Municipality. The overall aim is to avoid the loss of natural habitat in Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) and prevent the degradation of Ecological Support Areas (ESAs), while encouraging sustainable development in Other Natural Areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversification of Muroid Rodents Driven by the Late Miocene Global Cooling Nelish Pradhan University of Vermont
    University of Vermont ScholarWorks @ UVM Graduate College Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 2018 Diversification Of Muroid Rodents Driven By The Late Miocene Global Cooling Nelish Pradhan University of Vermont Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/graddis Part of the Biochemistry, Biophysics, and Structural Biology Commons, Evolution Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Pradhan, Nelish, "Diversification Of Muroid Rodents Driven By The Late Miocene Global Cooling" (2018). Graduate College Dissertations and Theses. 907. https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/graddis/907 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations and Theses at ScholarWorks @ UVM. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate College Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ UVM. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DIVERSIFICATION OF MUROID RODENTS DRIVEN BY THE LATE MIOCENE GLOBAL COOLING A Dissertation Presented by Nelish Pradhan to The Faculty of the Graduate College of The University of Vermont In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Specializing in Biology May, 2018 Defense Date: January 8, 2018 Dissertation Examination Committee: C. William Kilpatrick, Ph.D., Advisor David S. Barrington, Ph.D., Chairperson Ingi Agnarsson, Ph.D. Lori Stevens, Ph.D. Sara I. Helms Cahan, Ph.D. Cynthia J. Forehand, Ph.D., Dean of the Graduate College ABSTRACT Late Miocene, 8 to 6 million years ago (Ma), climatic changes brought about dramatic floral and faunal changes. Cooler and drier climates that prevailed in the Late Miocene led to expansion of grasslands and retreat of forests at a global scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Species List: Mammals
    Appendix 10 - Species list: Mammals Mammal species recorded in the Garden Route National Park. Sources: Crawford (1981 & 1982); De Graaff (1974); Grindley (1985). Hanekom et al. (1987); Hanekom unpubl.; Hanekom & Bower (1992); Herzig-Straschil & Robison (1978); McIlleron (2002); Pretorius et al. (1980); Riley unpubl.; Robinson (1976); SANParks unpublished data; Von Breitenbach (1974); Whitfield et al. (1983); Species numbers follow Skinner & Chimimba (2005). * Alien species not indigenous to South Africa No. Scientific Name Common Name CHRYSOCHLORIDAE 9 Chlorotalpa duthieae Duthie’s golden mole 14 Amblysomus corriae (iris) Fynbos (Zulu) golden mole ORYCTEROPODIDAE 27 Orycterus afer Aardvark PROCARVIIDAE 28 Procavia capensis Rock hyrax ELEPHANTIDAE 31 Loxodonta africana African savannah elephant LEPORIDAE 34 Lepus saxatilis Scrub hare BATHYERGIDAE 40 Bathyergus suillus Cape dune molerat 42 Cryptomys hottentotus African molerat 45 Georychus capensis Cape molerat HYSTRICIDAE 46 Hystrix africaeaustralis Cape porcupine MYOXIDAE 57 Graphiurus ocularis Spectacled dormouse 59 Graphiurus murinus Woodland dormouse MURIDAE 62 Acomys subspinosus Cape spiny mouse 65 Rhabdomys pumilio Four-striped grass mouse 73 Grammomys dolichurus Woodland thicket rat 79 Mus minutoides Pygmy mouse 82 Mastomys natalensis Natal multimammate mouse 85 Myomyscus verreauxii Verreaux’s mouse Rattus rattus* Black rat Rattus norvegicus* Brown rat 98 Otomys irroratus Vlei rat 116 Dendromus mesomelas Brant's climbing mouse 117 Dendromus mystacalis Chestnut climbing mouse CERCOPITHECIDAE
    [Show full text]
  • Rodent Assemblages in the Mosaic of Habitat Types in the Zambezian Bioregion
    diversity Article Rodent Assemblages in the Mosaic of Habitat Types in the Zambezian Bioregion Vincent R. Nyirenda 1,* , Ngawo Namukonde 1 , Matamyo Simwanda 2 , Darius Phiri 2, Yuji Murayama 3 , Manjula Ranagalage 3,4 and Kaula Milimo 5 1 Department of Zoology and Aquatic Sciences, School of Natural Resources, Copperbelt University, P.O. Box 21692, Kitwe 10101, Zambia; [email protected] 2 Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, School of Natural Resources, Copperbelt University, P.O. Box 21692, Kitwe 10101, Zambia; [email protected] (M.S.); [email protected] (D.P.) 3 Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba City, Ibaraki 305-8572, Japan; [email protected] (Y.M.); [email protected] (M.R.) 4 Department of Environmental Management, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Rajarata University of Sri Lanka, Mihintale 50300, Sri Lanka 5 Department of National Parks and Wildlife, Ministry of Tourism and Arts, Private Bag 1, Chilanga 10100, Zambia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +260-977-352035 Received: 12 July 2020; Accepted: 21 September 2020; Published: 23 September 2020 Abstract: Rodent assemblages have ecological importance in ecosystem functioning and protected area management. Our study examines the patterns of assemblages of rodents across four habitat types (i.e., Miombo woodland, Acacia woodland, grasslands and farmlands) in the savanna environment. Capture-mark-recapture (CMR) methods were applied for data collection across the Chembe Bird Sanctuary (CBS) landscape. The Non-metric Multi-Dimensional Scaling (NMDS) was used for exploratory data analysis, followed by Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Tukey–Kramer’s Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) post-hoc tests.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 15 the Mammals of Angola
    Chapter 15 The Mammals of Angola Pedro Beja, Pedro Vaz Pinto, Luís Veríssimo, Elena Bersacola, Ezequiel Fabiano, Jorge M. Palmeirim, Ara Monadjem, Pedro Monterroso, Magdalena S. Svensson, and Peter John Taylor Abstract Scientific investigations on the mammals of Angola started over 150 years ago, but information remains scarce and scattered, with only one recent published account. Here we provide a synthesis of the mammals of Angola based on a thorough survey of primary and grey literature, as well as recent unpublished records. We present a short history of mammal research, and provide brief information on each species known to occur in the country. Particular attention is given to endemic and near endemic species. We also provide a zoogeographic outline and information on the conservation of Angolan mammals. We found confirmed records for 291 native species, most of which from the orders Rodentia (85), Chiroptera (73), Carnivora (39), and Cetartiodactyla (33). There is a large number of endemic and near endemic species, most of which are rodents or bats. The large diversity of species is favoured by the wide P. Beja (*) CIBIO-InBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Universidade do Porto, Vairão, Portugal CEABN-InBio, Centro de Ecologia Aplicada “Professor Baeta Neves”, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal e-mail: [email protected] P. Vaz Pinto Fundação Kissama, Luanda, Angola CIBIO-InBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Universidade do Porto, Campus de Vairão, Vairão, Portugal e-mail: [email protected] L. Veríssimo Fundação Kissama, Luanda, Angola e-mail: [email protected] E.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Name
    SYRAH RESOURCES GRAPHITE PROJECT, CABO DELGADO, MOZAMBIQUE TERRESTRIAL FAUNAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Prepared by: Prepared for: Syrah Resources Limited Coastal and Environmental Services Mozambique, Limitada 356 Collins Street Rua da Frente de Libertação de Melbourne Moçambique, Nº 324 3000 Maputo- Moçambique Australia Tel: (+258) 21 243500 • Fax: (+258) 21 243550 Website: www.cesnet.co.za December 2013 Syrah Final Faunal Impact Assessment – December 2013 AUTHOR Bill Branch, Terrestrial Vertebrate Faunal Consultant Bill Branch obtained B.Sc. and Ph.D. degrees at Southampton University, UK. He was employed for 31 years as the herpetologist at the Port Elizabeth Museum, and now retired holds the honorary post of Curator Emeritus. He has published over 260 scientific articles, as well as numerous popular articles and books. The latter include the Red Data Book for endangered South African reptiles and amphibians (1988), and co-editing its most recent upgrade – the Atlas and Red Data Book of the Reptiles of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland (2013). He has also published guides to the reptiles of both Southern and Eastern Africa. He has chaired the IUCN SSC African Reptile Group. He has served as an Honorary Research Professor at the University of Witwatersrand (Johannesburg), and has recently been appointed as a Research Associate at the Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Port Elizabeth. His research concentrates on the taxonomy, biogeography and conservation of African reptiles, and he has described over 30 new species and many other higher taxa. He has extensive field work experience, having worked in over 16 African countries, including Gabon, Ivory Coast, DRC, Zambia, Mozambique, Malawi, Madagascar, Namibia, Angola and Tanzania.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix: Orchid Potting Mixtures - an Abridged Historical Review 1
    Appendix: Orchid potting mixtures - An abridged historical review 1 T. J. SHEEHAN Introduction There is little doubt that potting media development over time has been the salvation of orchid growers (Bomba, 1975). When epiphytic orchids were first introduced into England and other European countries in the 18th century growers could not envision plants growing in anything but soil. '"Peat and loam' were good for everything and frequently became the mass murderers of the first generation of epiphytic orchids," Hooker is believed to have said around the end of the 19th century; England had become the graveyard of tropical orchids. Undoubtedly this was in reference to the concern individuals were having over the potting media problems. This problem also drew the attention of such noted individuals as John Lindley and Sir Joseph Paxton, as well as the Gardener's Chronicle, who noted that "The Rule of Thumb" had nothing to say about orchid growing; it was only effective in orchid killing (Bomba 1975). Fortunately, the ingenuity of growers solved the problem as innovative potting mixes evolved over the years. After visiting a number of orchid growing establishments it immediately becomes obvious to any orchid grower, professional or hobbyist, that orchids, both epiphytic and terrestrial, will grow in a wide variety of media. It has often been stated that epiphytic orchids can be grown in any medium except soil as long as watering and fertilization are adjusted to fit the mix being used. Ter­ restrial orchids seem to thrive in any medium that contains 40% or more organic matter. Reading cultural recommendations from the early days of orchid growing is most interesting and highly recommended.
    [Show full text]
  • Aloe Names Book
    S T R E L I T Z I A 28 the aloe names book Olwen M. Grace, Ronell R. Klopper, Estrela Figueiredo & Gideon F. Smith SOUTH AFRICAN national biodiversity institute SANBI Pretoria 2011 S T R E L I T Z I A This series has replaced Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa and Annals of the Kirstenbosch Botanic Gardens which SANBI inherited from its predecessor organisations. The plant genus Strelitzia occurs naturally in the eastern parts of southern Africa. It comprises three arborescent species, known as wild bananas, and two acaulescent species, known as crane flowers or bird-of-paradise flowers. The logo of the South African National Biodiversity Institute is based on the striking inflorescence of Strelitzia reginae, a native of the Eastern Cape and KwaZulu-Natal that has become a garden favourite worldwide. It symbol- ises the commitment of the Institute to champion the exploration, conservation, sustainable use, appreciation and enjoyment of South Africa’s exceptionally rich biodiversity for all people. TECHNICAL EDITOR: S. Whitehead, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew DESIGN & LAYOUT: E. Fouché, SANBI COVER DESIGN: E. Fouché, SANBI FRONT COVER: Aloe khamiesensis (flower) and A. microstigma (leaf) (Photographer: A.W. Klopper) ENDPAPERS & SPINE: Aloe microstigma (Photographer: A.W. Klopper) Citing this publication GRACE, O.M., KLOPPER, R.R., FIGUEIREDO, E. & SMITH. G.F. 2011. The aloe names book. Strelitzia 28. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria and the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Citing a contribution to this publication CROUCH, N.R. 2011. Selected Zulu and other common names of aloes from South Africa and Zimbabwe.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora of Southern Africa, Which Deals with the Territories of South
    FLORA OF SOUTHERN AFRICA VOLUME 5 Editor G. Germishuizen Part 1 Fascicle 1: Aloaceae (First part): Aloe by H.F. Glen and D.S. Hardy Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2016 https://archive.org/details/floraofsoutherna511 unse FLORA OF SOUTHERN AFRICA which deals with the territories of SOUTH AFRICA, LESOTHO, SWAZILAND, NAMIBIA AND BOTSWANA VOLUME 5 PART 1 FASCICLE 1: ALOACEAE (FIRST PART): ALOE by H.F. Glen and D.S. Hardy Scientific editor: G. Germishuizen Technical editor: E. du Plessis NATIONAL Botanical Pretoria 2000 1 Editorial Board B.J. Huntley National Botanical Institute, Cape Town, RSA R.B. Nordenstam Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden W. Greuter Botanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum Berlin- Dahlem, Berlin, Germany Cover illustration: The South African 10-cent piece in use from 1965 to 1989 had a depiction of Aloe aculeata on the reverse. Cythna Letty made the original painting from which the coin was designed. The illustration on the cover is derived (by removal of the figures of value) from a digital photograph of this coin by John Bothma, first published in Hem (1999, Hem’s handbook on South author, African coins & patterns , published by the Randburg). Reproduced by kind permission of J. Bothma. Typesetting and page layout by S.S. Brink, NBI, Pretoria Reproduction by 4 Images. P.O. Box 34059, Glenstantia, 0010 Pretoria Printed by Afriscot Printers, P.O. Box 75353, 0042 Lynnwood Ridge © published by and obtainable from the National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101, Pretoria, 0001 South Africa Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • VS-Kenya-0721
    Mammals of Kenya July 11-30, 2021 Venkat Sankar Table of Contents: I. Introduction: 1 II. Itinerary: 2 III. The results (Overview): 3 IV. Other sites: 4 V. Detailed account & Site guide: 5-30 VI. Acknowledgements: 30 VII. What we missed: 30-31 VIII. Mammal species list: 32-37 IX. Selected photographs: 38-44 I. Introduction Seeing my first African Wild Dogs in Laikipia, Kenya, in 2013 was one of those defining moments that turned me into a mammal watcher. Ever since, I’ve wanted to revisit Kenya to specifically target its huge array of unique, endemic, and more obscure mammals. It has always been a bit surprising to me why Kenya is ignored by mammal watchers compared to, for example, South Africa. Kenya has 400 mammal species (vs. South Africa’s 300) with a large number of endemics and East African specialties. Moreover, the country is a real melting pot of species from Central, North, and South Africa – nowhere else can you see Giant Forest Hog, Striped Hyena, and Sable on the same trip. There are lots of community areas and private conservancies where mammal watchers can do as they please and most interesting sites are packed into the southern 40% of the country, where roads are good and tourist infrastructure and accommodations are widespread and high quality. Despite all of these favorable qualities, most Kenyan reports are still standard safaris rather than hardcore mammal watching. With 3 free weeks to do a substantial trip in summer 2021 and their (thus far) acceptable handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, Kenya was the obvious choice after a few other plans fell through.
    [Show full text]
  • Aloe Sharoniae Nrcrouch & Gideon F.Sm. (Asphodelaceae)
    Bradleya 29/2011 pages 115 – 120 Aloe sharoniae N.R.Crouch & Gideon F.Sm. (Asphodelaceae): species rank for a leptoaloe from southern Africa Neil R. Crouch1,2 and Gideon F. Smith3,4,5 1 Ethnobotany Unit, South African National Biodiversity Institute, P.O. Box 52099, Berea Road, 4007 Durban. 2 School of Chemistry, University of KwaZulu-Natal, 4041 Durban. (email: [email protected]). 3 Office of the Chief Director: Biosystematics Research & Biodiversity Collections, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Private Bag X101, Pretoria, 0001 South Africa. 4 H.G.W.J. Schweickerdt Herbarium, Department of Plant Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, 0002 South Africa. 5 Centre for Functional Ecology, Departamento de Ciências da Vida, Universidade de Coimbra, 3001-455 Coimbra, Portugal. (email: [email protected]). Summary: A new species of Aloe L., Aloe sharoniae belong to one of the most cryptic of the formal N.R.Crouch & Gideon F.Sm., is recognised from groups recognized in this diverse genus – which northern KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa and includes the true grass aloes and leptoaloes Swaziland. This taxon was previously known as (Smith, 2003; Van Jaarsveld & Van Wyk, 2006; A. cooperi Baker subsp. pulchra Glen & Klopper & Smith, 2010; Smith & Crouch, 2010). D.S.Hardy but is here elevated to the rank of Shortly after submitting the description of species. From A. cooperi Baker it differs in having A. nicholsii Gideon F.Sm. & N.R.Crouch for re- leaves that are consistently devoid of teeth in the view, that was subsequently published in this 2 upper /3 of its leaf margins and basally covered journal (Smith & Crouch, 2010), a further inter- below with white, tuberculate maculations.
    [Show full text]