DOCSLIB.ORG

Criminal Procedure Code of the Czech Republic

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Criminal Procedure Code of the Czech Republic C O D E O F C R I M I N A L P R O C E D U R E O F T H E C Z E C H R E P U B L I C Table of Contents PART ONE Common Provisions (Sections 1 – 156) CHAPTER ONE General Provisions (Sections 1-12) CHAPTER TWO Court and Persons Participating in Proceedings (Sections 13-51b) SUBDIVISION ONE Competence and Jurisdiction of Courts (Sections 13-26) SUBDIVISION TWO Complementary Personnel (Sections 27-29) SUBDIVISION THREE Exclusion of Authorities Involved in Criminal Proceedings (Sections 30-31a) SUBDIVISION FOUR Accused Person (Sections 32-34) SUBDIVISION FIVE Defence Counsel (Sections 35-41) SUBDIVISION SIX Parties Concerned (Section 42) SUBDIVISION SEVEN Aggrieved Person (Section 43-49) SUBDIVISION EIGHT Agent of the Party Concerned and the Aggrieved Person (Sections 50-51a) SUBDIVISION NINE Access to Classified Information (Section 51b) CHAPTER THREE General Provisions on Acts in Criminal Proceedings (Section 52- 66) SUBDIVISION ONE Letters of Requests (Sections 53-54) SUBDIVISION TWO Protocol (Sections 55-58) SUBDIVISION THREE Submissions (Section 59) SUBDIVISION FOUR Time Limits (Section 60-61) SUBDIVISION FIVE Process Serving (Sections 62-64a) SUBDIVISION SIX Inspection of Documents (Section 65) SUBDIVISION SEVEN Disciplinary Fine (Section 66) CHAPTER FOUR Seizure of Persons, Items and Other Assets (Sections 67-88a) SUBDIVISION ONE Custody (Sections 67-74a) SUBDIVISION TWO Apprehension (Sections 75-77) SUBDIVISION THREE Prohibition of Travel Abroad (Section 77a) SUBDIVISION FOUR Surrender and Removal of Items, Seizure of Financial Resources, Booked Securities, Real Estate and other Asset Values (Sections 78- 81b) SUBDIVISION FIVE House and Personal Search, Search of Other Premises and Parcels, Entry to Residence, Other Premises and Parcels (Sections 82-85c) SUBDIVISION SIX Interception and Opening of Consignments, their Replacement and Monitoring (Sections 86-87c) SUBDIVISION SEVEN Interception and Recording of Telecommunications (Sections 88-88a) CHAPTER FIVE Evidence (Sections 89-118) SUBDIVISION ONE Testimony of the Accused (Sections 90-96) SUBDIVISION TWO Witnesses (Sections 97-104) 1 SUBDIVISION THREE Some Special Methods of Evidence (Sections 104a- 104e) SUBDIVISION FOUR Experts (Sections 105-111) SUBDIVISION FIVE Questioning by the Means of a Video-conference Device (Section 111a) SUBDIVISION SIX Material and Documentary Evidence (Section 112) SUBDIVISION SEVEN Examination (Sections 113-118) CHAPTER SIX Decision (Sections 119-140) SUBDIVISION ONE Judgment (Sections 120-133) SUBDIVISION TWO Resolution (Sections 134-138) SUBDIVISION THREE Full Force and Effect and Enforceability of a Decision (Sections 139-140) CHAPTER SEVEN Complaints and Proceedings Thereon (Sections 141-150) CHAPTER EIGHT Costs of Criminal Proceedings (Sections 151-156) PART TWO Pre-trial Proceedings (Sections 157-179h) CHAPTER NINE Procedure Prior to Initiation of Criminal Prosecution (Section 158- 159b) CHAPTER TEN Initiation of Criminal Prosecution, Further Procedure and Summary Pre-trial Proceedings (Sections 160-179h) SUBDIVISION ONE Initiation of Criminal Prosecution (Section 160) SUBDIVISION TWO Investigation (Sections 161-167) SUBDIVISION THREE Special Provisions Concerning the Investigation of Certain Criminal Offences (Sections 168-170) SUBDIVISION FOUR Decision in Pre-trial Proceedings (Sections 171-173a) SUBDIVISION FIVE Supervision of the Public Prosecutor (Sections 174-175) SUBDIVISION SIX Agreement on the Guilt and Punishment (Sections 175a- 175b) SUBDIVISION SEVEN Indictment (Sections 176-179) SUBDIVISION EIGHT Summary Pre-trial Proceedings (Sections 179a-179h) PART THREE Trial Proceedings (Sections 180-365) CHAPTER ELEVEN Basic Provisions (Sections 180-184) CHAPTER TWELVE Preliminary Hearing of the Indictment (Sections 185-195) CHAPTER THIRTEEN Trial (Sections 196-231) SUBDIVISION ONE Preparation of Trial (Sections 196-198a) SUBDIVISION TWO Publicity of the Trial (Sections 199-201) SUBDIVISION THREE Opening of the Trial (Sections 202-206) SUBDIVISION FOUR Evidence (Sections 207-215) SUBDIVISION FIVE Conclusion of the Trial (Sections 216-218) SUBDIVISION SIX Adjourning the Trial (Section 219) SUBDIVISION SEVEN Decision of the Court in the Trial (Sections 220-230) SUBDIVISION EIGHT Decision of Court outside the Trial (Section 231) CHAPTER FOURTEEN Public Session (Sections 232-239a) CHAPTER FIFTEEN Closed Session (Sections 240-244) CHAPTER SIXTEEN Appeals and Appeal Proceedings (Sections 245-265) 2 CHAPTER SEVENTEEN Extraordinary Appeals (Sections 265a-265s) CHAPTER EIGHTEEN Complaints for Violation of Law and Proceedings Thereon (Sections 266-276) CHAPTER NINETEEN New Trial (Sections 277-289) CHAPTER TWENTY Special Types of Proceedings (Sections 290-314s) SUBDIVISION ONE Proceedings in Juvenile Matters (Sections 291-301) SUBDIVISION TWO Proceedings against a Fugitive (Sections 302-306a) SUBDIVISION THREE Conditional Discontinuation of Criminal Prosecution (Sections 307-308) SUBDIVISION FOUR Settlement (Sections 309-314) SUBDIVISION FIVE Proceedings before a Single Judge (Sections 314a-314g) SUBDIVISION SIX Proceedings after Repealing a Decision by a Decision of the Constitutional Court (Sections 314h-314k) SUBDIVISION SEVEN Proceedings on the Review of an Order for Interception and Recording of Telecommunication Traffic (Sections 314l-314n) SUBDIVISION EIGHT Proceedings on the Approval of the Agreement on the Guilt and Punishment (Sections 314o-314s) CHAPTER TWENTY-ONE Execution Proceedings (Section 315-362) SUBDIVISION ONE repealed (Sections 316-319) SUBDIVISION TWO Execution of a Sentence of Imprisonment (Sections 320- 334) SUBDIVISION THREE Execution of a Sentence of House Confinement (Sections 334a-334h) SUBDIVISION FOUR Execution of a Sentence of Community Service (Sections 335-340b) SUBDIVISION FIVE Execution of some Other Punishments (Sections 341-350j) SUBDIVISION SIX Statute Bar of Execution of a Sentence (Section 350k) SUBDIVISION SEVEN Execution of Protective Treatment and Security Detention (Sections 351-358) SUBDIVISION EIGHT Execution of Certain Other Decisions (359-362) CHAPTER TWENTY-TWO Expungement of Conviction (Sections 363-365) PART FOUR Some of the Actions Associated with Criminal Proceedings (Sections 366- 460zp) CHAPTER TWENTY-THREE Pardon and Amnesty (Section 366-370a) CHAPTER TWENTY-FOUR Repealed (Sections 371-374) CHAPTER TWENTY-FIVE Legal Co-operation with Foreign States (Sections 375- 460zp) SUBDIVISION ONE General Provisions (Sections 375-382) SUBDIVISION TWO Extradition (Section 383-402) SUBDIVISION THREE Special Provisions for the Transfer of Persons between Member States of the European Union under the European Arrest Warrant (Sections 403-422) SUBDIVISION FOUR Transit for Proceedings Abroad (Sections 423-424) SUBDIVISION FIVE Requests (Sections 425-446) 3 SUBDIVISION SIX Take-over and Transfer of Criminal Matters (Sections 447- 448) SUBDIVISION SEVEN Execution of Decisions in Relation to Foreign States (Sections 449-460) SUBDIVISION EIGHT Special Provisions on Recognition and Execution of Decisions on Freezing of Property or Evidence between Member States of the European Union (Sections 460a-460n) SUBDIVISION NINE Special Procedure for Recognition and Execution of Financial Penalties and other Financial Payments with Member States of the European Union (Sections 460o-460zp) PART FIVE Transitional and Final Provisions (Sections 461-471) 4 141/1961 Coll. ACT of November 29, 1961 on Criminal Procedure (Criminal Procedure Code) Amendment: 57/1965 Coll., 59/1965 Coll. Amendment: 173/1968 Coll. Amendment: 58/1969 Coll. Amendment: 149/1969 Coll., 156/1969 Coll. Amendment: 48/1973 Coll. Amendment: 29/1978 Coll. Amendment: 43/1980 Coll. Amendment: 159/1989 Coll. Amendment: 50/1990 Coll. Amendment: 53/1990 Coll. Amendment: 81/1990 Coll. Amendment: 101/1990 Coll. Amendment: 178/1990 Coll. Amendment: 303/1990 Coll. Amendment: 558/1991 Coll. Amendment: 25/1993 Coll. Amendment: 115/1993 Coll. Amendment: 283/1993 Coll., 292/1993 Coll. Amendment: 154/1994 Coll. Amendment: 214/1994 Coll. Amendment: 8/1995 Coll. Amendment: 152/1995 Coll. Amendment: 150/1997 Coll. Amendment: 209/1997 Coll. Amendment: 148/1998 Coll. Amendment: 166/1998 Coll. Amendment: 191/1999 Coll. Amendment: 29/2000 Coll. Amendment: 227/2000 Coll. Amendment: 30/2000 Coll. Amendment: 77/2001 Coll. Amendment: 144/2001 Coll. Amendment: 265/2001 Coll., 424/2001 Coll. Amendment: 200/2002 Coll. (part) Amendment: 226/2002 Coll. Amendment: 320/2002 Coll. Amendment: 218/2003 Coll., 279/2003 Coll. 5 Amendment: 200/2002 Coll., 237/2004 Coll., 257/2004 Coll. Amendment: 283/2004 Coll. Amendment: 539/2004 Coll. Amendment: 539/2004 Coll. (part), 587/2004 Coll. Amendment: 239/2005 Coll. Amendment: 45/2005 Coll., 394/2005 Coll. Amendment: 413/2005 Coll. Amendment: 79/2006 Coll., 113/2006 Coll. Amendment: 321/2006 Coll. Amendment: 115/2006 Coll., 253/2006 Coll. Amendment: 165/2006 Coll. Amendment: 112/2006 Coll. Amendment: 179/2007 Coll. Amendment: 170/2007 Coll. Amendment: 345/2007 Coll. Amendment: 135/2008 Coll. Amendment: 121/2008 Coll., 177/2008 Coll. Amendment: 384/2008 Coll. Amendment: 90/2008 Coll., 129/2008 Coll., 274/2008 Coll., 457/2008 Coll., 480/2008 Coll. Amendment: 52/2009 Coll. Amendment: 301/2008 Coll., 7/2009 Coll. Amendment: 218/2009 Coll. Amendment: 41/2009 Coll., 272/2009 Coll., 306/2009 Coll. Amendment: 163/2010 Coll. Amendment: 219/2010 Coll. Amendment: 197/2010 Coll. Amendment: 150/2011 Coll. Amendment: 181/2011 Coll. Amendment: 207/2011 Coll. Amendment: 330/2011 Coll. Amendment: 341/2011 Coll., 348/2011 Coll., 459/2011 Coll. Amendment: 357/2011
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pharmacy Support Person Registration of Respondent
    BEFORE THE IOWA BOARD OF PHARMACY Re: Case No. 2011-172 Pharmacy Support Person Registration of STATEMENT OF CHARGES TYLERANTHONY SMITH Registration No. 792, Respondent COMES NOW, the Complainant, Lloyd K. Jessen, and states: 1. He is the Executive Director ofthe Iowa Board ofPharmacy and files this Statement ofCharges solely in his official capacity. 2. The Board has jurisdiction in this matter pursuant to Iowa Code Chapters 147,155A and 272C (2011). 3. The Board issued Tyler Anthony Smith (hereinafter, "Respondent") pharmacy support person registration number 792, subject to the laws of the State ofIowa and the rules ofthe Board. Respondent's registration was last renewed on July 12, 2010, and will expire on June 30, 2012. 4. At all times material to this Statement ofCharges, Respondent was employed as a pharmacy support person at Hy-Vee Pharmacy, Perry, Iowa. A. CHARGES COUNT I- UNLAWFUL POSSESSION AND DISTRIBUTION OF DRUGS Respondent is charged pursuant to Iowa Code §§ 124.403, i55A.6B(s) and 155A.21 (2011), and 657 Iowa Administrative Code § 36.i(4)(h), with possession and distribution of a prescription drugs - specifically, controlled substances - for other than lawful purposes. COUNT II - VIOLATING LAWS RELATED TO PHARMACY Respondent is charged pursuant to Iowa Code § 155A.6B(5) (2011) and 657 Iowa Administrative Code § 36.i(4)(j) with violating state laws related to the practice of pharmacy; specifically, laws relating to possession and distribution ofcontrolled substances found at Iowa Code §§ 124.403,155A.21 and 155A.23 (2011). COUNT III - INABILITY TO PRACTICE DUE TO CHEMICAL ABUSE Respondent is charged pursuant to Iowa Code § i55A.6B(s) (2011), and 657 Iowa Administrative Code § 36.1(4X111) with the inability to practice as a pharmacy support person, with reasonable skill and safety, due to chemical abuse.
    [Show full text]
  • CITY of VANCOUVER RESOLUTION July 7, 2008
    CITY OF VANCOUVER RESOLUTION July 7, 2008 RESOLUTION NO. fl-&ha A RESOLUTION relating to selection of a Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) for the Columbia River Crossing project (CRC), adauthorizing action by the City of Vancouver's delegates to the C-TRAN Board and Regional Transportation Council Board, guided by the principles herein, in support of a regional LPA. WHEREAS, Interstate 5 is a conidor of national significance that serves the entire west coast of the United States, as well as international commerce with Canada, Mexico, and all of the countries of the Pacific Rim that access US west coast sea ports; and WHEREAS, Interstate 5 between Portland, Oregon and Vancouver, Washington experiences some of the worst congestion along the entire length of the Interstate 5 corridor; and WHEREAS, the 1-5 Interstate Bridge is one of only two Columbia River crossings between Vancouver, Washington and Portland, Oregon and approximately 138,000 people rely on crossing the 1-5 Bridge daily by car, transit, bicycle and on foot; and WHEREAS, the Vancouver-Portland Metropolitan Area is expected to grow by one million new residents by the year 2030; and WHEREAS, the existing 1-5 bridges ate old and do not meet current seismic hazard avoidance standards; and WHEREAS, the 1-5 Transportation and Trade Partnership Final Strategic Plan recommended congestion and mobility improvements within the 1-5 Bridge Influence Area in 2002; and WHEREAS, the Governors of Oregon and Washington initiated the Columbia River Crossing Project (CRC) and appointed a 39
    [Show full text]
  • Emergency Operations Revision: 79 Effective Date: July 28, 2021
    PJM Manual 13: Emergency Operations Revision: 79 Effective Date: July 28, 2021 Prepared by System Operations Division PJM © 2021 PJM Manual 13: Emergency Operations Table of Contents Table of Contents Table of Exhibits......................................................................................... 6 Approval...................................................................................................... 7 Current Revision.........................................................................................8 Introduction.................................................................................................9 About PJM Manuals.............................................................................................................9 About This Manual...............................................................................................................9 Intended Audience.....................................................................................................9 References...............................................................................................................10 Using This Manual.............................................................................................................10 What You Will Find In This Manual.......................................................................... 10 Section 1: Overview..................................................................................11 1.1 Policy Statements.......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Traveling Salesman Problem
    TRAVELING SALESMAN PROBLEM, THEORY AND APPLICATIONS Edited by Donald Davendra Traveling Salesman Problem, Theory and Applications Edited by Donald Davendra Published by InTech Janeza Trdine 9, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia Copyright © 2010 InTech All chapters are Open Access articles distributed under the Creative Commons Non Commercial Share Alike Attribution 3.0 license, which permits to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt the work in any medium, so long as the original work is properly cited. After this work has been published by InTech, authors have the right to republish it, in whole or part, in any publication of which they are the author, and to make other personal use of the work. Any republication, referencing or personal use of the work must explicitly identify the original source. Statements and opinions expressed in the chapters are these of the individual contributors and not necessarily those of the editors or publisher. No responsibility is accepted for the accuracy of information contained in the published articles. The publisher assumes no responsibility for any damage or injury to persons or property arising out of the use of any materials, instructions, methods or ideas contained in the book. Publishing Process Manager Ana Nikolic Technical Editor Teodora Smiljanic Cover Designer Martina Sirotic Image Copyright Alex Staroseltsev, 2010. Used under license from Shutterstock.com First published December, 2010 Printed in India A free online edition of this book is available at www.intechopen.com Additional hard copies can be obtained
    [Show full text]
  • When Can I Confirm an Arbitration Award?
    When Can I Confirm an Arbitration Award? June 01, 2021 Timeline to Confirm Arbitration Award BST Ohio Corp. v. Wolgang, 2021-Ohio-1785 In this appeal, the Supreme Court of Ohio reversed the lower court’s decision, holding that neither R.C. 2711.09 nor R.C. 2711.13 requires a court to wait three months after an arbitration award is issued before confirming the award. The Bullet Point: In this matter, the Supreme Court of Ohio determined that trial courts need not wait three months before confirming an arbitration award. In making this determination, the Court analyzed the interplay of the timing requirements of R.C. 2711.09 and 2711.13. Under R.C. 2711.09, a party may file an application to confirm an arbitration award with a court of common pleas within one year after the award is issued. Thereafter, the court must grant an order and issue judgment confirming said award unless it has been vacated, modified, or corrected pursuant to R.C. 2711.10 and 2711.11. As compared to said one-year limit to confirm, R.C. 2711.13 mandates that a party seeking to alter the results of arbitration must move to vacate, modify, or correct the award within three months of the award being issued. In this case, the plaintiff applied to the Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court (the “trial court”) to confirm the arbitration award the same day it was issued. The following day, the defendant filed a petition to vacate or correct the award in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Proceedings of the Meetings of the Board Of
    OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE MEETINGS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF PORTAGE COUNTY, WISCONSIN January 18, 2005 February 15, 2005 March 15, 2005 April 19, 2005 May 17, 2005 June 29, 2005 July 19, 2005 August 16,2005 September 21,2005 October 18, 2005 November 8, 2005 December 20, 2005 O. Philip Idsvoog, Chair Richard Purcell, First Vice-Chair Dwight Stevens, Second Vice-Chair Roger Wrycza, County Clerk ATTACHED IS THE PORTAGE COUNTY BOARD PROCEEDINGS FOR 2005 WHICH INCLUDE MINUTES AND RESOLUTIONS ATTACHMENTS THAT ARE LISTED FOR RESOLUTIONS ARE AVAILABLE AT THE COUNTY CLERK’S OFFICE RESOLUTION NO RESOLUTION TITLE JANUARY 18, 2005 77-2004-2006 ZONING ORDINANCE MAP AMENDMENT, CRUEGER PROPERTY 78-2004-2006 ZONING ORDINANCE MAP AMENDMENT, TURNER PROPERTY 79-2004-2006 HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES NEW POSITION REQUEST FOR 2005-NON TAX LEVY FUNDED-PUBLIC HEALTH PLANNER (ADDITIONAL 20 HOURS/WEEK) 80-2004-2006 DIRECT LEGISLATION REFERENDUM ON CREATING THE OFFICE OF COUNTY EXECUTIVE 81-2004-2006 ADVISORY REFERENDUM QUESTIONS DEALING WITH FULL STATE FUNDING FOR MANDATED STATE PROGRAMS REQUESTED BY WISCONSIN COUNTIES ASSOCIATION 82-2004-2006 SUBCOMMITTEE TO REVIEW AMBULANCE SERVICE AMENDED AGREEMENT ISSUES 83-2004-2006 MANAGEMENT REVIEW PROCESS TO IDENTIFY THE FUTURE DIRECTION TECHNICAL FOR THE MANAGEMENT AND SUPERVISION OF PORTAGE COUNTY AMENDMENT GOVERNMENT 84-2004-2006 FINAL RESOLUTION FEBRUARY 15, 2005 85-2004-2006 ZONING ORDINANCE MAP AMENDMENT, WANTA PROPERTY 86-2004-2006 AUTHORIZING, APPROVING AND RATIFYING A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT INCLUDING GROUND
    [Show full text]
  • Final Resolution and Order Vs
    COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO PUERTO RICO ENERGY COMMISSION MARC BEJARANO CASE NO.: CEPR-RV-2017-0004 PETITIONER SUBJECT: FinAl Resolution And Order vs. AUTORIDAD DE ENERGÍA ELÉCTRICA DE PUERTO RICO RESPONDENT FINAL RESOLUTION AND ORDER I. Brief ProcedurAl BAckground On February 27, 2017, Marc Bejarano (“Petitioner” or “Mr. Bejarano”) filed a petition for bill review before the Puerto Energy Commission (“Commission”) pursuAnt to Article 6.27 of Act 57-20141 and Regulation 8863.2 Mr. Bejarano’s petition relates to a past due charge included in A bill dated October 28, 2016 issued by the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) to Ms. Wendy CArroll PArker. On MArch 17, 2017, PREPA AppeAred before the Commission And requested an extension until April 10, 2017 to reply to Mr. BejArAno’s petition. The Commission grAnted PREPA’s request on MArch 20, 2017. On April 4, 2017, Mr. BejArAno filed A Motion requesting thAt the heAring in this case be conducted in the English language. The Commission grAnted the Petitioner’s request on April 5, 2017, pursuant to Section 1.10 of Regulation 8543.3 On April 10, 2017, PREPA filed A motion requesting the dismissAl of Mr. BejArAno’s petition. On April 19, 2017, the Commission held A hearing to Address: (1) whether it has jurisdiction to consider the dispute of the past due charges contested by the Petitioner; (2) whether there Are grounds to consider the present cAse As A complAint rAther thAn A petition for bill review, given PREPA having allegedly transferred the past due balance to the 1 The Puerto Rico Energy TrAnsformAtion And RELIEF Act, As Amended.
    [Show full text]
  • 1- Board Order No. 065 Final Resolution of the Board Of
    BOARD ORDER NO. 065 FINAL RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF TAXICAB COMMISSIONERS CITY OF LOS ANGELES WHEREAS, the Board, as part of each taxicab franchise ordinance, may adopt vehicle standards and requirements for clean fuel/clean air taxicab vehicle policies; and WHEREAS, the City Council on October 26, 2010, approved the renewal of the existing taxicab franchise agreements to at least December 31, 2015, and that such renewal approval included a “green taxi” provision whereby 80% of each Los Angeles taxicab fleet (not including Wheelchair Accessible vehicle exemptions) must be included as “green” vehicles producing lower smog pollution and Green House Gas emissions by the end of 2015; and WHEREAS, the Board approved Board Order No. 062 on December 16, 2010, establishing the City of Los Angeles Taxicab Greening Program describing “green” vehicle standards and deployment requirements during the taxicab franchising period in order to aide in the reduction of pollutants emitted from taxicab transportation vehicles for both smog pollution and Green House Gas emissions; and WHEREAS, the Board has reviewed the potential for a temporary taxicab vehicle substitution program whereby vehicles removed from active service (outage) due to unexpected major repairs or replacement issues may be temporarily replaced with a pre-approved substitute green taxicab, lessening the economic effect to vehicle owners and drivers during vehicle outage periods, as well as providing more consistent service capability to the public; and WHEREAS, the Board of Taxicab Commissioners approved Tentative Resolution, Board Order No. 065 on June 16, 2011, and such Tentative Resolution was published on June 23, 2011, for a five-day public review period; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that each taxicab operator (franchisee) shall have the option (if they so desire), to establish an authorized “green” taxicab substitution vehicle pool, for use as temporary taxicab fleet vehicle substitutes during vehicle outage periods of both “green” and other types of taxicabs.
    [Show full text]
  • Initiation Combined with the Auxiliary and the Son’S
    7145 EAST SECOND STREET American Legion Post 44 SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85251-5575 LOUNGE (480) 941-9053 American Legion Talks OFFICE (480) 941-0130 January 2014 www.post44.org - [email protected] VOLUME 2014 PUBLISHED MONTHLY FOR MEMBERS ISSUE 1 Post Commander, John Hyde Well here it is January the start of another great year for Post 44. I hope all will have a great New Year. We have a lot going on this month and I hope all the visitors will enjoy the newly decorated club. The trustees worked very hard on this. I along with two master painters was a big help. The Master painters were Bob Horkey and Keith Thomas. I thank them and also Mike Scholz who coordinated this with the help of a decorator. The new fixtures were installed by Ron Ishen. Steve added a timer to the heater on the patio. This will save us some money. The Trustees have done a great job for our Post. When you see Mike Scholz, Steve Tivnan and Ron Ishen tell them thanks. The month of January will have the New member Initiation combined with the Auxiliary and the Son’s. This will be the second year that we have done this and I believe that it adds to the legion family to see just what a great family we have. This will include a buffet; so mark this date 14 January 6:00PM. I encourage all members to come and visit our new members. This is what makes our Post grow. We must also congratulate our Boy Scout Troop 440, Scout Master Bill Norling and his crew have done a fantastic job with our Scouts.
    [Show full text]
  • The Omega Man Or the Isolation of U.S. Antitrust Law
    Loyola University Chicago, School of Law LAW eCommons Faculty Publications & Other Works 2020 The Omega Man or the Isolation of U.S. Antitrust Law Spencer Weber Waller Loyola University Chicago, School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://lawecommons.luc.edu/facpubs Part of the Antitrust and Trade Regulation Commons Recommended Citation Spencer Weber Waller, The Omega Man or the Isolation of U.S. Antitrust Law, 52 CONN. L. REV. 123 (2020). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by LAW eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications & Other Works by an authorized administrator of LAW eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CONNECTICUT LAW REVIEW VOLUME 52 APRIL 2020 NUMBER 1 Article The Omega Man or the Isolation of U.S. Antitrust Law SPENCER WEBER WALLER There is a classic sciencefiction novel andfilm that presenta metaphorfor the isolation of United States antitrust law in the current global context. Richard Mathiesson 's 1954 classic science fiction novel, I am Legend, and the later 1971 film released under the name of The Omega Man starring Charleton Heston, both deal with the fate of Robert Neville, a survivor of a world-wide pandemic who believes he is the last man on Earth. While I am Legend and The Omega Man are obviously works offantasy, it nonetheless has resonancefor contemporaryantitrust debate and discourse. United States antitrust law and policy diverges significantly from the rest of the global antitrust community in important areas of scope, philosophy, doctrine, procedure, remedies, and institutions.Much of this divergence in world view is the product of history and path dependence that is largely unique to the United States experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Transgender Woman 'Raped 2,000 Times' in All-Male Prison
    A transgender woman was 'raped 2,000 times' in all-male prison Transgender woman 'raped 2,000 times' in all-male prison 'It was hell on earth, it was as if I died and this was my punishment' Will Worley@willrworley Saturday 17 August 2019 09:16 A transgender woman has spoken of the "hell on earth" she suffered after being raped and abused more than 2,000 times in an all-male prison. The woman, known only by her pseudonym, Mary, was imprisoned for four years after stealing a car. She said the abuse began as soon as she entered Brisbane’s notorious Boggo Road Gaol and that her experience was so horrific that she would “rather die than go to prison ever again”. “You are basically set upon with conversations about being protected in return for sex,” Mary told news.com.au. “They are either trying to manipulate you or threaten you into some sort of sexual contact and then, once you perform the requested threat of sex, you are then an easy target as others want their share of sex with you, which is more like rape than consensual sex. “It makes you feel sick but you have no way of defending yourself.” Mary was transferred a number of times, but said Boggo Road was the most violent - and where she suffered the most abuse. After a failed escape, Mary was designated as ‘high-risk’, meaning she had to serve her sentence as a maximum security prisoner alongside the most violent inmates. “I was flogged and bashed to the point where I knew I had to do it in order to survive, but survival was basically for other prisoners’ pleasure,” she said.
    [Show full text]
  • 26 CFR Ch. I (4–1–20 Edition)
    § 301.6511(a)–1 26 CFR Ch. I (4–1–20 Edition) otherwise expire with respect to Corporation (5) Computation of 60-day period when P’s 2007 return), a court proceeding is last day of assessment period falls on a brought to enforce the designated summons weekend or holiday. For purposes of issued to Corporation P. On June 6, 2011, the paragraph (c)(1)(ii) of this section, in court orders Corporation P to comply with the designated summons. Corporation P does determining whether a designated sum- not appeal the court’s order. On September 6, mons has been issued at least 60 days 2011, agents for Corporation P deliver mate- before the date on which the period of rial that they state are the records requested limitations on assessment prescribed in by the designated summons. On October 13, section 6501 expires, the provisions of 2011, a final resolution to Corporation P’s re- section 7503 apply when the last day of sponse to the designated summons occurs the assessment period falls on a Satur- when it is determined that Corporation P day, Sunday, or legal holiday. has fully complied with the court’s order. (e) Effective/applicability date. This The suspension period applicable with re- spect to the designated summons issued to section is applicable on July 31, 2009. Corporation P consists of the judicial en- [T.D. 9455, 74 FR 38097, July 31, 2009] forcement period (March 3, 2011, through Oc- tober 13, 2011) and an additional 120-day pe- LIMITATIONS ON CREDIT OR REFUND riod under section 6503(j)(1)(B), because the court required Corporation P to comply with § 301.6511(a)–1 Period of limitation on the designated summons.
    [Show full text]