16 AUG i 3: 44N

AD

ORLEANS TOWN CLERK ORLEANS HISTORICAL COMMISSION TOWN HALL, 19 SCHOOL STREET, ORLEANS MA 02643

MINUTES OF MEETING

From: Ann Sinclair, Acting Chair 508- 255- 5371

Date: Tuesday, July 12, 2016

Time: 4 PM

Place: Town Hall, Skaket Room

PRESENT ABSENT Bryant Besse Richard Besciak (alternate) Ron Petersen Dorothy Bowmer Lisa Fernandes ( alternate) Alan McClennen ( selectman) Sarah Baratholomew

1. Minutes of June 10, 2016

Ron Petersen moved to accept the minutes. Sarah Bartholomew seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED

2. Update from PAL/Ginny Adams

Ginny Adams gave us an Interim Report for Phase one which is attached. She told us that there were 450 properties in Marcis but not a way to track which ones have been demolished. Ann Sinclair suggested we go through the minutes, but that will only tell us which ones have received demo permits, not which have been torn down. Lisa Fernandes offered to help.

Because of the unevenness of the existing forms, priority should be given to the more historic buildings. That will help us have a framework on the more important buildings. Ginny Adams stated marcis. net works best in Foxfire or Google Chrome. Ron Petersen brought up whether the old saltworks and Revolutionary War sites should be added so that their context could be understood with the existing sites. She talked about the priority for Property selection. Town owned buildings ( 12) and cemeteries ( 3) are a priority. Geographically, the Nauset Heights area which has not been previously inventoried is a priority. Large tracts of land with buildings and buildings constructed before 1920 are a high priority for the survey. Properties inventoried between 1979 and 1990 and between 1990 and 1997wi11 be reviewed and assessed for their adequacy and photos. Further, properties with no existing inventory forms will be reviewed. See PAL' s Phase I Report for details.

Ginny Adams will provide the Commission with a meeting report.

3. Demolition Requests

There are several coming up -- 209 Main Street 29 Hensens Way 47 Monument Rd.

MEETING ADJOURNED 5: 30PM.

Ann Sinclair Seed t2A040-21.— Interim Report Orleans Community-Wide

Public Archaeology Laboratory Historic Properties Survey Orleans,

Phase I Methodology Statement Submitted to: July 7, 2016 PAL No. 3194

Town of Orleans Town Administrator' s Office 19 School Road Orleans, MA 02653

The Town ofOrleans( Town) and the Orleans Historical Commission( OHC) have engaged the Public Archaeology Laboratory, Inc. (PAL) to complete a community-wide historic properties survey. The project is funded by Community Preservation Coalition( CPC) funds. This Methodology Statement is prepared as part of Phase I project tasks. It focuses on the identification of historic resources available for the project and the development of the methodology. This report outlines survey objectives, criteria for selection, procedures, work products, expectations about the historic properties to be recorded, assessment of existing information, a working bibliography, and information on working and large-scale base maps. All project tasks and products will meet the MHC criteria, methodology, and current standards for community surveys.

Virginia H. Adams, Senior Architectural Historian is responsible for overseeing the project, and the team consists of Quinn R. Stuart, Carolyn Barry, and Gretchen Pineo, Architectural Historians, and Melissa Andrade, Assistant Architectural Historian. The Town representative is George Meservey, Town Planner. On the OHC, the primary contacts are Ann Sinclair, Chairman, and Ron Petersen, member.

1. Survey Objectives

The purpose ofthe project is to complete an intensive-level community-wide survey ofcultural and architectural resources in the Town. The goals of the survey project are to assess and document approximately 500 selected cultural and architectural resources, to identify contexts for National Register ofHistoric Places( National Register) evaluation, and to submit a list ofindividual properties and/ or districts that are recommended for nomination to the National Register to the Town and MHC. To date, the identification of significant cultural and architectural resources for the Town has taken place through previous community-wide surveys and National Register nominations. The Town' s goal for the present survey is to expand the current historic properties inventory to support better recognition and consideration of Orleans' s significant architectural and cultural resources. The survey results will also assist the Town in implementing its Demolition Delay bylaw adopted in 2005.

26 Main Street Pawtucket, RI 02860 Tel: 401. 728 8780 Fax: 401. 728. 8784 www. palinc_com 7

Report Orleans Community-wide Historic Properties Survey Phase I Methodology Statement

Jaevirar?+byst Wrt, page 2 of 13 r n

2. Criteria for Property Selection

General: The criteria for selection of the approximately 500 properties to be included in the Orleans survey are derived from the Town' s RFP; discussion at the project startup meeting on May 26, 2016, among representatives of the Town, the OHC, and PAL; and additional information received following the meeting. The town and the OHC do not have a predetermined list ofthe 500 properties to be included in the survey; therefore, analysis and reconnaissance and assessment surveys will be needed to determine what properties will be addressed and what form the documentation will take. There are two categories of properties, those with existing inventory forms, and those currently without a form. Also see Section 5 below for further discussion ofexisting information.

Geographic Area: The general geographic area under consideration is the entire town of Orleans. Within the town, the survey will primarily focus on selected locations along bodies of water—the coast and ponds—where development pressures are strong. The survey will take into account the named villages and neighborhoods in Orleans, especially those previously identified by the MHC MACRIS), which are Barley Neck-Ponchet, East Orleans, Namequot-Portnamequot, Namckaket, Nauset Beach-Nauset Heights, Orleans, Pochet, Rock Harbor, South Orleans, and Tonset-Weeset. Historic survey areas may be identified within the villages and neighborhoods. The OHC specifically noted Nauset Heights, which has notpreviously been surveyed andprovided a list of22 properties in that area, and move westward towardMain Street.

Resource Types: Town-owned buildings and other resources such as cemeteries, are a priority for survey.

Potentially Threatened Resources: Large tracts ofland of 80,000 square feet or more with buildings, which is a category considered to be at risk for subdivision, are a priority. Buildings constructed before 1920, which fall within the purview of the Town' s Demolition Delay Ordinance, have top priority, and any resources threatened by development are recognized as a high priority for survey.

Construction Dates: The time frame for construction dates ofproperties in the survey will primarily be for properties built up to 1920, akey date cited in the town demolition delay ordinance. The survey will also address properties built up to 1966, the current 50-year cutoff date per MHC survey standards, although likely to a lesser degree.

Properties with Existing Inventory Forms: Based on the initial Phase I review, ofthe 449 previously surveyed properties in MACRIS, slightly less than halfwere inventoried between 1979 and 1990 and slightly more than half were inventoried in 1990 and 1997. During Phase II, PAL will make a more detailed review of all the existing MHC Inventory forms for Orleans properties and areas to assess the adequacy of the existing inventory forms. The older forms are expected to have less information, and, therefore, may need a contemporary photograph to bring them to the present.

Properties with No Existing Inventory Forms: A review ofthe town-wide GIS database for properties and dates shows there are:

472 properties before or in 1920, 262 properties between 1920 and 1944, 1; 257 properties between 1920 and 1966, and 1, 729 properties before 1966. Report Orleans Community-wide Historic Properties Survey rA` Phase I Methodology Statement

iPek: .: 00, 11,} page 3 of 13

The 472 properties before or in 1920 correspond roughly to the number of previously surveyed properties, 449, in MACRIS. PAL suggests making the 262 buildings constructed between 1920 and 1944 a priority. The year 1944 is the date of a good historic USGS map and also the period before World War II. After the war, development grew exponentially. However, any mid-twentieth-century buildings of importance will be noted and included.

To assist in selecting properties that have not previously been surveyed for the Phase III intensive survey, PAL will conduct a town-wide windshield reconnaissance survey that will be completed during Phase H. The windshield survey will be targeted to specific properties using the GIS- based mapping. This survey will use a ranking of A, B, or C for properties constructed before 1966 that have not been previously surveyed.

A. Properties on the" A" list are properties, based on architecture, integrity, location, property type, and preliminary knowledge of town history, which warrant first priority inclusion in the survey. " A" list properties are selected to encompass all property types, time periods, architectural styles, and geographic locations in the town.

B. Properties on the" B" list are good examples of their type and period, but could be excluded at this time without compromising the comprehensive nature of the survey; it is recommended that they be reevaluated as some may be possibly surveyed in the future.

C. Properties on the " C". list are of little architectural interest, and often highly altered. This information will be entered in a database to aid in decisions about priorities for intensive survey of selected properties and areas.

This system takes into account age, architectural integrity, historical associations, visual access, and relationship to other buildings. For those 439 buildings and sites previously surveyed, the date and completeness of the existing inventory form, as well as any changes, will be assessed; however, the majority ofthe intensive survey will focus on the properties in neighborhoods that need additional or new survey. The 1910 Walker map will be used to identify properties constructed prior to that date; it is the map with the date closest to 1920.

In the reconnaissance survey, PAL will begin by assessing the list ofpotential survey properties and suggested areas of focus received from the OHC, in conjunction with a driveover ofthe entire town. The initial research and fieldwork will include a visit to every property on the OHC List for Nauset Heights and work westward toward Main Street.

Properties that have existing survey forms will be categorized as those that do not need an updated form, those that need an updated form, and those that have had alterations or changes since the original survey, and need a new photograph.

Based on this selection criteriaprocess, approximately 500properties will be addressedin the survey in a variety ofways. Due to the scale ofthe reconnaissance survey required PAL proposes to reduce the number ofnew or updated inventories properties to approximately 400 properties. Report Orleans Community-wide Historic Properties Survey V Phase I Methodology Statement page 4 of 13 r ms._"x.: rp7te+:nmmp

3. Procedures

PAL' s work will adhere to the MHC survey standards and the scope of work specified in the Town' s RFP for each of the four phases. The work will conform to MHC' s Historic Properties Survey Manual: Guidelinesfor the Identification ofHistoric andArchaeological Resources inMassachusetts 1992), Survey Technical Bulletin #1 ( 1993), MHC Interim Survey Guidelines( March 1999, et seq.), MHC Interim Guidelines for Inventory Form Photographs ( 2009), and MHC' s Guidelines for Inventory Form Locational Information ( 2013). Both MHC survey guidelines and the tasks and products ofthe survey Scope of Work meet the Secretary ofthe Interior' s Standards and Guidelines for Identification( 1983).

PAL' s approach to the Orleans community-wide survey will identify buildings, structures, and areas that are architecturally and historically significant in the history and development ofthe community built prior to 1966. It will include both representative and outstanding examples and will consider the full range of cultural resources, in terms of historical development patterns, resource types, architectural development, land use, economic development, social and demographic history including ethnic and cultural diversity), and events that had an impact on the community.

The project is divided into four phases:

Phase I

Identification of historic resources available for the project and development of methodology. This is the current phase underway. Tasks during Phase I( due July 8, 2016) include:

1. Meet with local project coordinator/local historical commission ( LPC/LHC) to discuss the scope and inventory methodology of the project and to assess the available documentary materials( LHC files, collections and existing research, maps, local histories, etc.). PAL met with OHC and Town representatives on May 26, 2016 to introduce the team, discuss the project goals and methods, review the maps and mapping data available. Additional meetings with OHC and Town representatives will be held at the end of each phase. 2. Select electronic maps, including a working map and base map ( assessor' s parcel map is preferred), to identify inventoried areas and properties; 3. Determine availability of electronic mapping and parcel data and of town-based GIS data suitable for use in the project; 4. Review existing inventory forms on file at the LHC and at the MHC; 5. Conduct initial research and desktop survey to verify the types and geographical distribution, and existing inventory status of cultural resources, and to develop criteria for selecting properties to be extensively researched in the survey.

Work Products: Methodology statement

Phase It

PHASE II— Identification ofproperties to be surveyed and production of sample inventory forms. This phase will involve a townwide reconnaissance survey and development of recommendations for Report Orleans Community-wide Historic Properties Survey ret` Phase I Methodology Statement

ai•- m,:,n. 1• c, cu. s oi«; page 5 of 13

updating the existing forms and completing new intensive level survey. Tasks and work products to be completed during Phase II( due September 30, 2016) include:

1. Complete desktop identification survey and reconnaissance survey based on results of the desktop identification survey, including the verification of types and geographical distribution and existing conditions ofpreviously inventoried properties. 2. Conduct continued architectural assessments and documentary research to identify important historic themes, events, and persons for the survey target areas, with particular attention to substantially synthesizing and supplementing the information already available. Research collections should include relevant local, regional and state library and archive collections, as well as web-based research sites. 3. Apply selection criteria and prepare list of specific properties to be surveyed. 4. Complete representative draft inventory forms for different property types. 5. Meet with OHC to review property lists and draft forms.

Work Products: PAL will be using a Web-based mapping and final mapping will be produced from GIS List ofproperties to be surveyed, arranged alphabetically by street address Representative draft inventory forms, to be submitted in both hard copy and MS Word format.

Phase III

PHASE III —Production of complete draft inventory forms for review by the OHC. Phase III (due April 27, 2018) contains the bulk ofthe intensive field survey, research, and writing.

1. Conduct intensive research of properties selected for inventory; 2. Identify contexts for National Register evaluation and apply National Register criteria to inventoried areas and resources; 3. Prepare draft list of all areas and resources recommended for National Register nomination; 4. Prepare inventory forms with photographs and property location maps. Forms for any surveyed properties listed in the State Register ofHistoric Places must be marked at top front with appropriate designation code and date. 5. Submit draft inventory forms with photographs, draft National Register contexts, and National Register recommendation to OHC for review and comment ( comments to be incorporated during Phase IV). 6. In consultation with OHC, MHC survey and MACRIS staff; develop lettering and numbering system for inventoried properties.

Work Products: Unnumbered complete draft new inventory forms, updates, or new photographs for approximately 400 properties with photos and locus maps for all areas, buildings, sites, structures, and parks/landscapes.( This information may optionally be submitted in electronic form only for this project phase [ CD or DVD].) Draft discussion of National Register contexts and list of all areas and resources

recommended for National Register nomination. Report Orleans Community-wide Historic Properties Survey A` Phase I Methodology Statement r i,..•_rc c•atc, y u rn mry • page 6 of 13

Phase IV

PHASE IV—Production offinal inventory forms, reports and maps. In Phase IV( due June 29, 2018), the following final tasks and work products will be accomplished:

1. Add inventory letters/numbers to forms, ifthese were not added in Phase III. 2. Name MS Word files to conform to MHC file-naming convention. 3. Complete National Register Criteria Statement forms to be attached to appropriate inventory forms. 4. Prepare base map(s) identifying inventoried properties. 5. Prepare street index ofinventoried areas and properties.

Work Products: Hard-copy numbered MHC inventory forms for approximately 400 properties( two sets with original photographic prints: one for MHC and one for the OHC) Large-scale base map(s) with all inventoried areas and properties identified by inventory number( two sets: one for MHC and one for the OHC) Survey Final Report( fourpaginaterZ unbound copies( two for MHC, two for OHC)

4. Expectations of the Historic Properties to Be Recorded

The majority of the individual properties that will be included in the reconnaissance survey will be residential, civic, and commercial buildings dating from the mid-nineteenth century to the mid- twentieth century. The OHC noted 22 properties in Nauset Heights for inclusion in the reconnaissance survey and for potential intensive survey. The OHC also requested the reconnaissance surveybegin in Nauset Heights and move eastward toward Main Street. Other priority properties are those near bodies ofwater and those with lots of 80, 000 square feet or greater.

5. Assessment of Existing Documentation

PAL' s methodology includes a review of the existing survey forms and an assessment as to whether or not a property needs an updated survey. MHC files were reviewed, and copies obtained of all existing inventory and National Register and State Register forms. Research was also conducted at the Massachusetts State Archives, the Massachusetts State House Library, the Boston Public Library, the Orleans Snow Library and the Orleans Historical Society. Resources on the overall history and development of Orleans ( historic maps and atlases, Orleans town records, local histories, and unpublished materials) are contained in both the local history collection ofthe Orleans Snow Library, the collection of the Orleans Historical Society, as well as other local archives. The following discussion highlights and summarizes existing planning and historic preservation information on the project study area A working bibliography is included.

Town of Orleans

OHC has completed six new surveys between 1979 and 1997 as follows:

1979, Louise Dunham and Joan Sparrow for Orleans Historical Society 1981, Jack Clarke, Planning and Economic Development Committee Report Orleans Community-wide Historic Properties Survey r1` Phase I Methodology Statement page 7 of 13

1981- 1983 Historic Property Survey Team ofthe Orleans Historical Society 1990, Christine S. Beard with Orleans Historical Society 1996, Christine S. Beard and Tremont Preservation Services for the Orleans Historical Society 1997, Tremont Preservation Services for Orleans Historical Society

A survey in 2011 of 52 historic buildings and structures located near the town center that is noted in the Town' s Request for Proposals( RFP) is a compilation ofexisting inventory forms in specific areas of Town prepared by the OHC. Orleans Tax Assessment records indicate there are 485 buildings in the Town constructed prior to, or in, 1923.

In 2005, the town adopted the Community Preservation Act and, in 2005, passed a one-year demolition delay bylaw. The law directs the OHC to review proposed demolitions ofbuildings built prior to or in 1920, among other designation categories set out in the ordinance.

PAL staff made a preliminary examination for research of historic maps and atlases, local records, and town histories. These resources included an 1857 Map of Barnstable, Dukes, and Nantucket County, 1880 and 1905 Maps of the Town of Orleans and the Villages of Rock Harbor and Orleans, a 1910 Map ofOrleans, and Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps from 1929. Local records examined include Orleans Town Reports, Town of Orleans directories, street lists and voting lists, and the 1984 Massachusetts Historical Commission Reconnaissance Survey Report for the Town of Orleans. Town histories examined include A History ofEarly Orleans( Barnard 1975); History ofBarnstable County,Massachusetts( Deyo 1890); and The History ofCape Cod( Freeman 1862).

The collections at the Orleans Snow Library will be reviewed and pertinent materials will be copied. The Orleans Historical Society and local informants have been contacted to identify and collect information on important resources within the town. The Water Department does not keep water hookup records; however, information from the valuation reports, town reports, and street and business directories at the Clinton Historical Society will be collected Research was also conducted in public building record cards at the State Archives.

Massachusetts Historical Commission

The MHC Reconnaissance Town Report for Orleans serves as a partial basis for establishing a historic context for surveyed properties. The MHC files were reviewed to identify properties previously surveyed and properties listed in the National Register within the Town.

National Register/State Register ofHistoric Places Properties

At present, there are three individual properties and one historic district listed in the National Register, the most recent being Sea Call Farm( ORL.G) district, listed in 2008, which consists of 10 contributing resources. The three individual listed properties are the Universalist Society Meetinghouse ( NR listed 1999), the Coast Guard Motor Lifeboat CG 36500 (NR listed 2005), and the French Cable Station( NR listed 1972). A draft nomination for the Northwest Schoolhouse/ Odd Fellows Hall has been prepared and submitted to MHC and in process for potential listing. Report Orleans Community-wide Historic Properties Survey V Phase I Methodology Statement re, kr. uvv page 8 of 13

There is also one Local Historic District/State Register District, the Old King' s Highway Regional Historic District( ORL.E), which contains 67 individually inventoried resources.

Properties included in the Inventory of Historic and Archaeological Assets of the Commonwealth/Massachusetts Cultural Resource Information System( MACRIS)

Over 450 areas and individual resources have been surveyed and assigned inventory numbers in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Inventory of the Historic and Archaeological Resources of the Commonwealth, now filed in the online database, the Massachusetts Cultural Resource Inventory System( MACRIS). The MHC MACRIS database currently lists 449 resources, including 7 areas, in Orleans. A total of 5 areas and 362 individual resources have been assigned inventory numbers in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Inventory of the Historic and Archaeological Resources of the Commonwealth, but do not have any National, State, or Local designations.

6. Information to be Gathered About the Properties

Research

In Phase I, PAL collected and began review of the existing inventory forms in MACRIS online database. Copies of the MHC' s Reconnaissance Survey Report for Orleans and the Regional Report, as well as many published sources and historic maps, are already in the PAL library. PAL completed an initial assessment ofthe existing inventory forms, MHC Reconnaissance Survey Report findings, and historic maps showing areas of development. PAL identified online sources including the digitized Leventhal collection at the Boston Public Library, Ancestry.com, Find a Grave, Digital Commonwealth, bing.com aerials. Hathitrust.org, historicmapworks.com, and historicaerials.com, among others. PAL identified and will revisit local repositories during Phases II and III.

In Phase II, research will begin to focus on specific themes and geographical areas, and individual properties. In Phase III, research will support the development of the individual property and area inventory forms.

Desktop Field Preparation

Prior to conducting the reconnaissance fieldwork, in Phase II PAL will conduct a desktop survey of Orleans, including inspecting all roads developed before 1966 using historic maps, including the 1910 Map ofOrleans( Walker 1910) and early-twentieth-century USGS topographic maps, and aerial photography available online. PAL will identify preliminary boundaries of any neighborhoods or concentrations of development as potential areas that will be confirmed during the drive- over/walkover survey. PAL will use the Orleans Tax Assessment records to eliminate properties constructed after 1966 from the reconnaissance survey.

Fieldwork

In Phase II, PAL will complete an initial reconnaissance drive-over and walkover in August 2016 to verify the types and geographical distribution ofcultural resources and to assist in refining the criteria and list of properties to be the focus of research and survey. Report Orleans Community-wide Historic Properties Survey rA` Phase I Methodology Statement Ns.. c! swoiotWI.wnncry page 9 of 13

In Phase II, PAL will begin to conduct the. intensive-level survey starting with representative buildings for sample forms. In the Phase III, PAL will complete intensive survey for the properties selected to be included in the survey. A team ofan architectural historian and assistant architectural historian will collect information on the exterior of properties and take photographs from a public way.

7. Working and Large-Scale Base Maps

PAL will use a mobile GIS map for research, data collection, and survey refinement. Staffwill access the map via the ArcGIS " Colledtor" application on a 3G-enabled Wad tablet in the field as well as from desktop web browsers at the office. Using Esri' s ArcGIS Online platform, technical staff will configure a project-specific map with publicly available GIS resources including MACRIS Inventory Points and Areas ( distributed by MHC); building footprints, property boundaries, and assessors databases ( MassGIS); and aerial imagery ( Bing). All map layers will be enabled with search and query functions allowing project staff with a single tap or click, to look up address, approximate year built, etc. Staff will use the data collection functionality to record the locations and attributes of surveyed properties and areas in the field via the Wad tablet, reviewing and refining the survey via the desktop application. Attributes collected during fieldwork will include survey identification number, class ranking, style, and estimated date ofconstruction. This data will form the basis for data sheet lists of properties and survey maps.

The project mapping will use GIS-based parcel maps overlaid on aerials, with layers that include address, assessor' s parcel ID, and MACRIS information. PAL will prepare a large-scale( 24" x26") map and provide GIS compatible files as a final product in Phase IV.

8. Working Bibliography

Adams, Virginia H. and Candace Jenkins 1995 Route 6A, Cape Cod Resource Protection Cultural Landscape Survey. The Public Archaeology Laboratory, Inc. Report No. 648.01. Submitted to Cape Cod Commission, Barnstable, MA.

Adams, Virginia H. and Kathleen Miller 2014 Draft National Register ofHistoric Places Nomination. Northwest Schoolhouse/ Odd Fellows Hall, Orleans, Barnstable Co., MA. Submitted to Independent Order of Odd Fellows, Orleans, MA.

Barnard, Ruth L. 1975 A History ofEarly Orleans. W.S. Sullwold, Publishers, Taunton, MA.

Beard, Christine and Betsy Friedberg 1999 National Register of Historic Places Nomination Form, Universalist Society Meetinghouse, Orleans, Barnstable Co., MA. On file, Massachusetts Historic Commission, Boston, MA.

Brigham, Albert Perry 1920 Cape Cod and the Old Colony. G.P. Putnam's Sons, New York, NY.

Brown, Frank Chouteau Report Orleans Community-wide Historic Properties Survey Phase I Methodology Statement page 10 of 13 r t Iec, v tUi r.,*.-.,nc,;

1934 Jonathan Kendrick House, Orleans, MA, HABS MA-119. Historic American Buildings Survey( HABS), , Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C.

Communities Opportunities Group, Inc. 2015 Relocation Planfor Threatened Historic Buildings, Town ofOrleans. Report prepared for the Town of Orleans, Massachusetts. Communities Opportunities Group, Inc., Boston, MA.

Deyo, Simeon L. 1890 History ofBarnstable County, Massachusetts. H.W. Blake& Co., New York, NY.

Dwight, Timothy 1823 Travels in New-England and New- York. Vol. III. William Baynes& Son, London, England.

Freeman, Frederick 1862 The History ofCape Cod. Geo. Rand& Avery, Boston, MA.

Guzzi, Paul 1975 Historical Data Relating to Counties, Cities, and Towns in Massachusetts. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Boston, MA.

Jalbert, Russell R 1997 Where Sea& History Meet. Orleans Bicentennial Commission, Orleans, MA.

Jenkins, Candace, Patricia Crow, Christine Beard, and Betsy Friedberg 2008 National Register of Historic Places Nomination Form, Sea Call Farm, Orleans, Barnstable Co., MA. On file, Massachusetts Historic Commission, Boston, MA.

Kennedy, Peter B., Richard G. Ryder, Leonard W. Loparto, and Betsy Friedberg 2005 National Register of Historic Places Nomination Form, Coast Guard Motor Lifeboat CG 36500, Orleans, Barnstable Co., MA. On file, Massachusetts Historic Comniission, Boston, MA.

Klim, Jake 2014 . Attack on Orleans, the WWI Submarine Raid on Cape Cod. The History Press, Charleston, SC.

Kitteridge, Henry C. 1987 Cape Cod: Its People and Their History. Reprinted from 1930 Edition. Parnassus Imprints, Inc., Orleans, MA.

Lombardo, Daniel 2001 Images ofAmerica: Orleans. Arcadia Publishing, Charleston, SC.

Massachusetts Historical Commission( MHC) 1984 MHC Reconnaissance Survey Town Report: Orleans. The Massachusetts Historical Commission, Boston, MA. • Report Orleans Community-wide Historic Properties Survey 1` Phase I Methodology Statement yr%r: n,.,., Y _ page 11 of 13

1986 Historical& Archaeological Resources ofCape Cod and the Islands: A Frameworkfor Preservation Decisions. The Massachusetts Historical Commission, Boston, MA.

Nickerson, W. Sears 1981 The Bay—As I See It. Jack Viall, N.p.

Orleans Historical Commission 2011 " Inventory of Historic Buildings Built Prior to 1923." Orleans, MA.

Peterson, Ron n.d. " The Lifesaving Legacy of Orleans, Massachusetts." Typescript manuscript. Provided by author. ad " The Origins of the Town of Orleans—Working Draft." Typescript manuscript. Provided by author.

Pratt, Enoch 1844 A Comprehensive History, Ecclesiastical and Civil, ofEastham, Wellfleet, and Orleans. W.S. Fisher& Co., Yarmouth, MA.

Quinn, William P. 1993 The Saltworks ofHistoric Cape Cod. Parnassus Imprints, Inc., Orleans, MA. •

2012 Orleans: A Small Cape Cod Town with an Extraordinary History. Lower Cape Publishing, Orleans, MA.

Sanbom Map Company. 1929 Insurance Maps ofOrleans, Massachusetts. New York, NY.

Scammell, Henry 2004 H.K Cummings revisited 1887- 1905: collection ofSnow Library, Orleans, Massachusetts. O'Brien& Company, Printers, Inc., Bourne, MA.

Smith, George E., Henry J. Skeffington, and Samuel M. Mansifeld 1907 Atlas of the boundaries of the towns ofBarnstable, Brewster, Chatham, Dennis, Eastham, Falmouth, Harwich, Mashpee, Orleans, Provincetown, Truro, Wellfleet, Yarmouth, Barnstable County. Board of Harbor and Land Commissioners of Massachusetts, Boston, MA.

Stupich, Martin 1987 French Cable Station, Orleans, MA, HAER No. MA-57. Historic American Engineering Record( HAER), National Park Service, Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C.

Walker, George H. 1880 Atlas ofBarnstable County, Massachusetts. Walker Lithograph and Publishing Company, Boston, MA. Report Orleans Community- wide Historic Properties Survey p` Phase I Methodology Statement Page 12 of 13

1905 Atlas ofBarnstable County, Massachusetts. Walker Lithograph and Publishing Company, Boston, MA.

1910 Atlas ofBarnstable County, Massachusetts. Walker Lithograph and Publishing Company, Boston, MA.

Walling, Henry F. 1857 Map ofthe counties ofBarnstable, Dukes andNantucket,Massachusetts, based upon the trigonometrical survey ofthe state. D.R. Smith& Co., Boston, MA.

Wardwell, Anne R. 1972 National Register of Historic Places Nomination Form, French Cable Station, Orleans, Barnstable Co., MA. On file, Massachusetts Historic Commission, Boston, MA. Report wdtadetetmlienstotriHistoric Properties Survey

am a- rtenhaaa000 macaw, •

0 g il

si•

a a0r 0 -°"n g t a. eatVe7t4777.:' c']-*" nie. 1:,,,r''vt,;,,,, f,'a,-.." a's>" i; 104al rr,' Sr'

n:' .-; ' n? IC. ktiiita*---. 5i."; a.' c02:','- V,..",:,.1-.;•":;' 462,..', rn ' a K 2 1: 0 -. 4te,, r; Sea-" r"rn •-••••• Laka

4 ..":,..... lic,‘ '' . • - t• S'• . 4( 4. , . „ . 4$( 1/4-.4(1 lo.M. •-j its;,-. rii--

3:-.., r.4.. . deft 4;;; x:". c• ,, iii iic..,, ag.,._ ss„,... ..,.....: 1-3, ' i,,ti .-- 4 i (. S V' . - • Pk N - ' vri. 4 la

rl 0 G.

10 I4 c-„1 1 3 , t: wPlurists:w, . 1, cr. r. , ,--,. c'C' `'''. d , ire- ‘ - zi, 7,7 1 az , 1,..,1 ' 04 KJ de ti ' Ub 0' J in. ` 10 fi EU?' •/ rag. iM a A' t 1 ' 47410: t nil g r• oh arlij..- 5''..-', 5 g!! ," e. FrInifli r- 1

t,..-i; N •-•-- ' 4\ 7... 4.77V- i. ei, - 1 4 r. 4.,„.. • • - 2 ,../ / 2....1 ,..,, alol fi 1.6 Ill k ' I/ c{/ ' 7 iip•• • . 41,' Ng • • . 1 A-- \ it\ e( IIII-----At ' @ 1 < NI 2 re.) 1 ‘.., ::\ -- a, k 0 :, ,•- '-/ It 11/1 th ... eN, S.. , . •:' ' tt., . S _ a, e r..---: , es?' , I . 4 „,ei . a a S " e • k ,? g j) '''''”, -

0 Lar. ,?-•- '''

i. An. /--- ir CA, r . / S110 . ii-,.,. Ats ,;;;.- e • A z , • • i n 1°* 4. M t.! ,..- 0 1... 7- 4pa . 0 c....._.. =, „ i., b,>,. . cjj tre''',_ 1.L.:*------4i: \ POI3Lelaseeanse1I3MC°0fethminoodimiolotYgy-