DOCSLIB.ORG

Unearthing Africa's Potential

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

UNEARTHING AFRICA’S POTENTIAL ANNUAL REPORT & ACCOUNTS 2014 CREATING A STRONG BASE TO LEVERAGE FUTURE OPERATIONAL TRANSFORMATION Brad Gordon Chief Executive Officer 14 Through 2014, we successfully laid the foundations to help our business become a leading company in Africa and deliver returns to both our shareholders and stakeholder communities. We are changing the way in which we operate our assets, driving cultural 16 change and building lasting relationships which will lead to increased performance across the business. For more information, visit our website: www.acaciamining.com 18 Acacia Mining (“Acacia”), formerly African Barrick Gold, is Tanzania’s largest gold miner and one of CONTENTS the largest producers of gold in Africa. We have three producing mines, all located in north-west Tanzania: Bulyanhulu, Buzwagi and North Mara, and a portfolio of exploration projects in Tanzania, Kenya and Burkina Faso. 2 OUR Strategic report Highlights 2 Business at a glance 4 BUSINESS Chairman’s statement 6 Chief Executive’s review 8 Our strategy in action Re-engineering our mines Our business 14 Our people 16 Page 14 Our relationships 18 Key performance indicators 20 We have a leading portfolio of assets and are focused on Risk management 22 making our mines perform to their geological potential. 24 Performance review Operating review 26 Financial review 36 Sustainability review 42 OUR 46 PEOPLE Governance Governance overview 48 Board of Directors 50 Driving accountability and performance Senior Leadership Team 53 Corporate governance report 54 Page 16 Performance evaluation 58 Committee reports 59 Remuneration report 64 Driving cultural change across the workforce through a dedicated Principal risks and uncertainties 82 programme and the redesign of structures and roles. Other information 86 Directors’ responsibilities statement 91 Reserves and resources 92 96 Financial statements OUR Independent auditors’ report on the consolidated financial statements 97 Consolidated financial statements 101 RELATIONSHIPS Notes to the consolidated financial statements 106 Independent auditors’ report on the Proactive stakeholder engagement parent company financial statements 146 Parent company financial statements 148 Page 18 Notes to the parent company financial statements 152 Becoming the partner of choice for communities and Governments across Africa. 163 Shareholder information Glossary of terms 163 Shareholder enquiries 169 ACACIA MINING PLC ANNUAL REPORT & ACCOUNTS 2014 1 STRATEGIC REPORT HIGHLIGHTS Financial Operational Bulyanhulu, Tanzania Revenue (US$million) US$930.2m 234,786 2013: US$929.0m Ounces of gold produced A high-grade underground mine with a mine life 1,217.9 in excess of 30 years 975.0 1,011.7 929.0 930.2 We have moved to a mechanised mining method, with long hole stoping becoming the primary mining method. This will assist in the ramp up of the mine and is both safer and more cost effective than previous hand-held methods. 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 All-in sustaining cost1,2 (US$/oz) Buzwagi, Tanzania US$1,105/oz 210,063 2013: US$1,346/oz Ounces of gold produced A single open pit bulk tonnage operation with a mine 1,585 life of five years 1,346 1,114 1,105 We have shortened the life of the mine so that we are 917 mining only profitable ounces. Our five year plan now produces positive cash flow over each year of its remaining life. 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 1,3 EBITDA (US$million ) US$252.7m North Mara, Tanzania 2013: US$240.4m 273,803 545.5 Ounces of gold produced 419.2 336.3 A high-grade open pit operation, transitioning to a 240.4 252.7 dual open pit and underground operation with a mine life of nine years 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 We are moving forward with the creation of an underground operation at the Gokona pit. We believe that this will be more profitable than mining this deposit via an open pit 1 These are non-IFRS measures. Refer to page 166 for definitions. 2 2013 comparative amounts have been restated to exclude Tulawaka. and has a much lower impact on the community. 3 EBITDA includes continuing and discontinued operations. 2 ACACIA MINING PLC ANNUAL REPORT & ACCOUNTS 2014 STRATEGIC REPORT PERFORMANCE REVIEW GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION Operational Sustainability 26 42 For more information on Bulyanhulu For more information on sustainability Education US$2.5m Amount invested in 2014 Health US$0.8m 28 Amount invested in 2014 For more information on Buzwagi Water and sanitation US$1.3m Amount invested in 2014 Infrastructure US$2.6m 30 Amount invested in 2014 For more information on North Mara ACACIA MINING PLC ANNUAL REPORT & ACCOUNTS 2014 3 STRATEGIC REPORT BUSINESS We are a leading gold producer in Tanzania AT A GLANCE having produced nearly eight million ounces of gold in over a decade of operations. Our business model is designed to create a leading company in Africa. What we • A leading asset portfolio in Africa stand for • Focused on free cash flow • Disciplined capital allocation • Becoming the partner of choice • Growing our footprint Producing mines Exploration Bulyanhulu Near-mine/Brownfield Increasing • Bulyanhulu Resource Expansion shareholder value 17.3 • Bulyanhulu Regional BURKINA Total Reserves and Resources (Moz) FASO Greenfield South Houndé JV Buzwagi • West Kenya Joint Ventures • South Houndé Joint Venture 3.1 Generating Sustainable Total Reserves and Resources (Moz) During the year, US$18.3 million of exploration activities were expensed, free stakeholder North Mara with a further US$2.2 million relating KENYA West Kenya JV to exploration and evaluation activities cash flow returns being capitalised. Nyanzaga 4.8 North Mara Total Reserves and Resources (Moz) Bulyanhulu Golden Ridge Buzwagi 26 to 31 32 Developing land positions TANZANIA For more information on our For more information on our in the most geologically producing mines exploration projects prospective belts in Africa. Benefitting host countries Effective governance and risk management practices Sustainability Strong cost and capital discipline • Fostering strong, effective and experienced leadership • Developing community and Government relationships • Enhancing supply chain and inventory management • Providing for diversity • Protecting the environment • Maintaining appropriate operational cost levels • Developing sound governance structures and practices • Safeguarding safety and health in the workplace • Adopting stringent capital allocation and expenditure practices • Progressing and maintaining internal controls and risk mitigation strategies • Creating development and training opportunities for our employees • Using robust nancial management procedures • Respecting human rights 4 ACACIA MINING PLC ANNUAL REPORT & ACCOUNTS 2014 STRATEGIC REPORT PERFORMANCE REVIEW GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION Continued • Enhancing life of mine planning methods development • Driving mining and processing efficiencies through improved practices of our quality • Optimising mining, development and processing rates asset base • Investing in the right exploration All of our mines are located in the Lake Victoria Greenstone Belt, one of the most prospective areas for gold mining in Africa. Increasing shareholder value BURKINA FASO South Houndé JV Generating Sustainable KENYA free stakeholder West Kenya JV cash flow returns Nyanzaga North Mara Bulyanhulu Golden Ridge Buzwagi TANZANIA Benefitting host countries Effective governance and risk management practices Sustainability Strong cost and capital discipline • Fostering strong, effective and experienced leadership • Developing community and Government relationships • Enhancing supply chain and inventory management • Providing for diversity • Protecting the environment • Maintaining appropriate operational cost levels • Developing sound governance structures and practices • Safeguarding safety and health in the workplace • Adopting stringent capital allocation and expenditure practices • Progressing and maintaining internal controls and risk mitigation strategies • Creating development and training opportunities for our employees • Using robust nancial management procedures • Respecting human rights ACACIA MINING PLC ANNUAL REPORT & ACCOUNTS 2014 5 STRATEGIC REPORT CHAIRMAN’S The changes we made to the business a year ago STATEMENT underpinned the improvement we saw in 2014, as the business delivered strong operational and financial performance and returned to positive free cash flow for the first time in three years. Kelvin Dushnisky Chairman of the Board What makes us different? • Leading asset portfolio • Proven management team • Operational delivery • Financial flexibility • Cost discipline Dear Shareholders, Change of name to Acacia Mining 2014 was an important and pleasing year for An important development in 2014 was the the Company as we reaped the benefits of change of the Company’s name to Acacia Mining strengthening the Board and Management (LSE:ACA), which our shareholders voted in team in 2013. Whilst the gold price ended the favour of in November. The decision to change year at US$1,206 per ounce, only 1.6% down on the name was made in order to reflect the new the previous year, there was significant volatility culture and strategic direction of the business. throughout 2014, with a low of US$1,142 per The Acacia tree is hardy and resilient, and ounce putting further pressure on the sector. thrives in challenging environments. We believe In spite of continued challenges in the gold that these characteristics reflect our enhanced and wider
Recommended publications
  • TANZANIA MINERALS AUDIT AGENCY VISION to Be a Centre of Excellence in Monitoring and Auditing of Mining Operations

    TANZANIA MINERALS AUDIT AGENCY VISION to Be a Centre of Excellence in Monitoring and Auditing of Mining Operations

    THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA MINISTRY OF ENERGY AND MINERALS TANZANIA MINERALS AUDIT AGENCY VISION To be a centre of excellence in monitoring and auditing of mining operations. MISSION To conduct financial and environmental audits as well as auditing of quality and quantity of minerals produced and exported by miners in order to maximize benefits to the Government from the mining industry for sustainable development of the Country. CORE FUNCTIONS Auditing of Auditing of environmental Auditing of capital budget and quality and investment and expenditure of quantity of operating the mining produced and expenditure of entities for the exported the mining purpose of minerals by entities for the assessment of mining entities purpose of tax compliance to assessments the mine closure plan. Tanzania Minerals Audit Agency (TMAA) marked five years of its establishment by recording good performances as highlighted in this Annual Report. This has been made possible through the keen leadership of TMAA’s Ministerial Advisory Board combined with diverse skills, experience, commitment, hard work and dedication of staff. In the Annual Report for year 2013 we promised to continue improving our audits with the aim of ensuring maximization of Government revenue from the mineral sector. Following completion of year 2014, it is my sincere pleasure to report the following key outcomes: i. A total of TZS 101.3 billion was collected as royalty from the large scale mines, while total royalty payable decreased by 5.6% to TZS 107.38 billion compared to TZS 113.78 billion realized in year 2013. The decrease was mainly attributed by lower gold prices and closure of one major gold mine.
  • Overview of Tanzania's Mining Operations

    Overview of Tanzania's Mining Operations

    Public Disclosure Authorized SESA of the Tanzanian Sustainable Management of Mineral Resources Project Final Report May 2013 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Prepared by LUC in association with GEUS & Matrix Development Consultants Project Title: SESA of the Tanzanian Sustainable Management of Mineral Resources Project Client: Ministry of Energy and Minerals, Government of Tanzania Version Date Version Details Prepared by Checked by Approved by Principal 1 21/12/12 Draft Final Report LT, PN, SW, JT LT PN 2 02/05/13 Final Report LT, PN, SW, JT LT, NJ PN, NJ SESA of the Tanzanian Sustainable Management of Mineral Resources Project Final Report Prepared by LUC in association with GEUS & Matrix Development Consultants May 2013 Planning & EIA LUC BRISTOL Offices also in: Land Use Consultants Ltd Registered in England Design 14 Great George Street London Registered number: 2549296 Landscape Planning Bristol BS1 5RH Glasgow Registered Office: Landscape Management Tel:0117 929 1997 Edinburgh 43 Chalton Street Ecology Fax:0117 929 1998 London NW1 1JD Mapping & Visualisation [email protected] FS 566056 LUC uses 100% recycled paper EMS 566057 Contents 1 Introduction 3 Introduction to the Minerals Sector 3 The Sustainable Management of Mineral Resources Project 5 Purpose of the Report 5 2 The SESA Process 7 The Role of SESA 7 Methodology Used 8 3 Background to the Minerals Sector 11 Overview of Tanzania’s Mineral Resource 11 Overview of Tanzania’s Mining Operations 12 Background Context to
  • Acacia Mining: Human Rights Violations and the Company’S Grievance Mechanism in North Mara, Tanzania

    Acacia Mining: Human Rights Violations and the Company’S Grievance Mechanism in North Mara, Tanzania

    Questions & Answers Acacia Mining: Human rights violations and the company’s grievance mechanism in North Mara, Tanzania Click on the question to jump to the answer. 1. What is an operational-level grievance mechanism? 2. Why are they important? 3. What do grievance mechanisms have to do with human rights? 4. Why do businesses like company-based grievance mechanisms? 5. Do companies themselves investigate and decide grievances? 6. Who is Acacia Mining and where is its North Mara Gold Mine? 7. How is Acacia Mining linked to Barrick Gold? 8. What are the human rights problems at North Mara mine? 9. Who are these ‘intruders’ who come into the mine? 10. How does the Mine deal with ‘intruders’? 11. Is it necessary to use force against the ‘intruders’? 12. Is the company’s private security also involved in violations? 13. Does Acacia Mining have similar problems at its other mine sites? 14. Why does Acacia use the Tanzanian police to provide security? 15. Intruders have decreased so aren’t violations only a historical problem? 16. Are ‘intruders’ still being killed at North Mara mine? 17. Does Acacia report on how many ‘intruders’ are injured? 18. Has Acacia been questioned about its reporting on deaths/injuries? 19. Is Acacia right to say that RAID has made 'sweeping claims' and misrepresented the human rights situation? 20. If the Tanzanian police are shooting people, why is this the company’s responsibility? 21. How many police officers have been charged with criminal offences? 22. Has Acacia raised the issue of police violations with government officials? 23.
  • De Gouvernance À

    De Gouvernance À

    UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL DE GOUVERNANCE À RSE: LE GRI EST-IL UN OUTIL DE REDDITION DE COMPTES EFFICACE POUR L'IMPACT SUR LES ENJEUX DU DÉVELOPPEMENT DURABLE DES PRINCIPALES MINIÈRES CANADIENNES À L'ÉTRANGER? MÉMOIRE PRÉSENTÉ COMME EXIGENCE PARTIELLE DE LA MAÎTRISE ÈS SCIENCES DE LA GESTION PAR DAISY TIBURCIO CARNEIRO OCTOBRE 2018 UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL Service des bibliothèques Avertissement La diffusion de ce mémoire se fait dans le respect des droits de son auteur, qui a signé le formulaire Autorisation de reproduire et de diffuser un travail de recherche de cycles supérieurs (SDU-522 – Rév.07-2011). Cette autorisation stipule que «conformément à l’article 11 du Règlement no 8 des études de cycles supérieurs, [l’auteur] concède à l’Université du Québec à Montréal une licence non exclusive d’utilisation et de publication de la totalité ou d’une partie importante de [son] travail de recherche pour des fins pédagogiques et non commerciales. Plus précisément, [l’auteur] autorise l’Université du Québec à Montréal à reproduire, diffuser, prêter, distribuer ou vendre des copies de [son] travail de recherche à des fins non commerciales sur quelque support que ce soit, y compris l’Internet. Cette licence et cette autorisation n’entraînent pas une renonciation de [la] part [de l’auteur] à [ses] droits moraux ni à [ses] droits de propriété intellectuelle. Sauf entente contraire, [l’auteur] conserve la liberté de diffuser et de commercialiser ou non ce travail dont [il] possède un exemplaire.» REMERCIEMENTS L'exercice d'un mémoire est certainement un défi qui nous tire hors de notre zone de confort.
  • Abuse by Barrick Gold Corporation Barrick's Porgera Gold Mine

    Abuse by Barrick Gold Corporation Barrick's Porgera Gold Mine

    FACTSHEET: Abuse by Barrick Gold Corporation Representing survivors of gang rape and those killed by Barrick Gold Corporation’s security guards at the Porgera gold mine in Papua New Guinea Canadian mining company Barrick Gold Corporation, the largest gold mining company in the world, operates the Porgera mine in Papua New Guinea (PNG), where security guards have raped and gang-raped hundreds of local women and girls and killed several local men. EarthRights International (ERI) represents a number of survivors of rape and family members whose relatives were killed by Barrick security guards. Barrick’s Porgera Gold Mine Barrick has owned and operated the Porgera gold mine since 2006, when it acquired the previous owner, Placer Dome. Barrick also acquired a legacy of environmental damage and human rights abuses that it has failed to remedy. Each day, Barrick dumps more than 16,000 tons of waste into the Porgera River and local creeks that villagers have long relied upon for drinking water, bathing, and washing clothes and food. The mine’s ever-expanding waste dumps continue to take over the land and bury the homes of the original landowners that have lived in the region for generations, long before large-scale mining came to Porgera. Surrounded on all sides, villagers have no choice but to cross the dangerous dumps to reach agricultural land, commercial areas, schools or other villages. Many have not been compensated for the loss of their land and their homes, and Barrick has refused to relocate them. Without land to farm and sources of clean water, practically the only means of income available to some of the local indigenous communities is to scavenge for remnants of gold in the open pit or the treacherous waste dumps.
  • Tanzania-BHR Mission North Mara

    Tanzania-BHR Mission North Mara

    The International Commission of Jurists concludes visit to North Mara mine in Tanzania On Friday 1 September, a delegation from the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) concluded a learning and assessment mission to the North Mara region and the North Mara Gold Mine Ltd, a subsidiary of Acacia Mining plc located in north-west Tanzania in the Tarime district of the Mara region. The visit took place between 27 August and 1 September. The objective of the ICJ Mission was to learn about the operation with a view to assessing the effectiveness of the North Mara Gold Mine’s operational grievance mechanism (OGM) in addressing complaints over alleged human rights concerns and abuses committed in connection with the mine’s operations. The mission noted the progress that the mine has made in developing its OGM and will be continuing to gather information with a view to more fully understanding its operation. The North Mara mine is by far the largest investment and economic engine for the region, and a major attraction for people migrating into the immediate area, whose population has grown exponentially since the mine was initiated in 1998. The prospect of gold predictably created a strong economic magnet that was bound to attract people in search of economic opportunities. As company officials themselves acknowledged, the company was slow in putting in place the necessary physical security and measures to avoid human rights abuses and to redress those which occurred. The delegation is grateful to the NGO Legal and Human Rights Centre (LHRC) of Tanzania for its facilitation of the visit and especially the meetings with a number of people who have grievances pending against the company.
  • Annual Information Form for the Year Ended December 31, 2018 Dated As of March 22, 2019 BARRICK GOLD CORPORATION

    Annual Information Form for the Year Ended December 31, 2018 Dated As of March 22, 2019 BARRICK GOLD CORPORATION

    Barrick Gold Corporation Brookfield Place, TD Canada Trust Tower Suite 3700, 161 Bay Street, P.O. Box 212 Toronto, ON M5J 2S1 Annual Information Form For the year ended December 31, 2018 Dated as of March 22, 2019 BARRICK GOLD CORPORATION ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM TABLE OF CONTENTS GLOSSARY OF TECHNICAL AND BUSINESS TERMS 4 REPORTING CURRENCY, FINANCIAL AND RESERVE INFORMATION 10 FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION 11 SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION 14 THIRD PARTY DATA 15 GENERAL INFORMATION 15 Organizational Structure 15 Subsidiaries 16 Areas of Interest 18 General Development of the Business 18 History 18 Significant Acquisitions 18 Strategy 19 Recent Developments 21 Results of Operations in 2018 22 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS 26 Production and Guidance 26 Reportable Operating Segments 26 Barrick Nevada 27 Pueblo Viejo (60% basis) 28 Lagunas Norte 29 Veladero (50% basis) 29 Turquoise Ridge (75% basis) 30 Acacia Mining plc (63.9% basis) 31 Pascua-Lama Project 32 Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources 33 Marketing and Distribution 46 Employees and Labor Relations 47 Competition 48 Sustainability 48 Operations in Emerging Markets: Corporate Governance and Internal Controls 49 Board and Management Experience and Oversight 50 Communications 51 - i - Internal Controls and Cash Management Practices 51 Managing Cultural Differences 52 Books and Records 52 MATERIAL PROPERTIES 52 Cortez Property 52 Goldstrike Property 58 Turquoise Ridge Mine 63 Pueblo Viejo Mine 69 Veladero Mine 76 Kibali Mine 86 Loulo-Gounkoto Mine Complex 93 EXPLORATION
  • Ministry of Energy and Minerals Tanzania Minerals Audit Agency (Tmaa)

    Ministry of Energy and Minerals Tanzania Minerals Audit Agency (Tmaa)

    THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA MINISTRY OF ENERGY AND MINERALS TANZANIA MINERALS AUDIT AGENCY (TMAA) REPORT ON MINERALS ROYALTY FORMS AND RATES APPLICABLE IN THE MINING INDUSTRY December, 2009 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................2 SCOPE ....................................................................................................3 1.0 METHODOLOGY ..........................................................................3 2.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ................................................4 3.0 MINERAL ROYALTY FORMS .....................................................6 3.1 Flat Rate Unit of Production Form of Royalty .................................................... 6 3.2 Gross Revenue Form of Royalty ............................................................................. 7 3.3 Net Smelter Return Form of Royalty .................................................................... 8 3.4 Net Proceeds Form of Royalty ................................................................................ 9 3.5 Profit Based Form of Royalty .................................................................................. 9 4.0 SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF ROYALTY FORMS ................... 11 4.1 Lessons from other Countries on the Subject Matter ..................................... 15 5.0 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ..........................17 6.0 REFERENCES .............................................................................18 ANNEX ANNEX A: Royalty
  • The Porgera Mine – Papua New Guinea

    The Porgera Mine – Papua New Guinea

    To the Ministry of Finance Recommendation of 14 August 2008 Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Sources 2 3 The Council’s considerations 3 4 Accusations of severe environmental damage and other factors 4 5 The Porgera mine – Papua New Guinea 6 5.1 Background 6 5.2 Riverine tailings disposal 8 5.2.1 Sediment load 8 5.2.2 Discharge of heavy metals 11 5.3 Environmental effects on the flood plain and Lake Murray 13 5.3.1 Mercury pollution 16 5.3.2 Health and social effects associated with the tailings disposal 18 6 Barrick’s response to the Council 20 7 The Council’s assessment 22 8 Conclusion 25 9 Recommendation 25 1 Introduction At a meeting held on 4 October 2005, the Council on Ethics for the Government Pension Fund – Global decided to assess whether investments in the company then known as Placer Dome, currently Barrick Gold Corporation, would imply a risk of the Fund contributing to severe environmental damage under the Ethical Guidelines, point 4.4. As of 31 December 2007 the Government Pension Fund – Global held shares worth some NOK 1,274 million in the company. Barrick Gold is a Canadian mining company, which, in several countries, has been accused of causing extensive environmental degradation. The Council has investigated whether riverine tailings disposal from the Porgera mine in Papua New Guinea generates severe environmental damage, and finds it established that the mining operation at Porgera entails considerable pollution. The Council attributes particular importance to the heavy metals contamination, especially from mercury, produced by the tailings.
  • Annual Reportannual 2016 Barrick Goldbarrick Corporation of Owners Of

    Annual Reportannual 2016 Barrick Goldbarrick Corporation of Owners Of

    Barrick Gold Corporation Annual Report 2016 Barrick Gold Corporation A Company of Owners Annual Report 2016 Our Vision is the generation of wealth through responsible mining – wealth for our owners, our people, and the countries and communities with which we partner. We aim to be the leading mining company focused on gold, growing our cash flow per share by developing and operating high-quality assets through disciplined allocation of human and financial capital and operational excellence. “ In 2016, we further strengthened our balance sheet and generated record free cash flow through a disciplined and rigorous approach to capital allocation. Going forward, digital technology and innovation will play an increasingly important role across our business as we seek to grow the long-term value of our portfolio with a focus on growing margins and returns over production volume.”Kelvin Dushnisky, President Our Assets are located in geopolitically stable regions with an increasing focus on our five core mines in the Americas. Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves6 As at Production Cost of Sales AISC1† Tonnes Grade Contained Golden Sunlight Hemlo December 31, 2016 (000s ozs) ($/oz) ($/oz) (000s ozs) (gm/t) (000s ozs) Turquoise Ridge JV Goldstrike 20% Cortez Goldstrike 1,096 852 714 70,685 3.55 8,077 19% ~70% of 2016 production Cortez 1,059 901 518 151,002 2.11 10,220 Pueblo Viejo 13% from core mines at Cost of Sales$793/oz Pueblo Viejo (60%) 700 564 490 85,821 2.93 8,087 1 8% and AISC $606/oz Lagunas Norte Lagunas Norte 435 651 529 70,670 1.86 4,218 Other Gold Mines: Porgera JV, Papua New Guinea Veladero 544 872 769 252,125 0.83 6,749 Kalgoorlie JV, Australia Acacia, Tanzania Other Copper Mines: Core mines sub-total 3,834 793 606 631,283 1.85 37,473 Zaldívar Copper JV 10% Jabal Sayid JV, Saudi Arabia Veladero Lumwana, Zambia Total Barrick 5,517 798 730 2,006,898 1.33 85,950 †Please see page 84 of the 2016 Financial Report for corresponding endnotes.
  • Kinsley Technical Report

    Kinsley Technical Report

    MINE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES A Division of RESPEC TECHNICAL REPORT Of THE KINSLEY PROJECT, Elko and White Pine Counties, Nevada, U.S.A. Submitted to: Authors: Michael Gustin, C.P.G. Gary L. Simmons, MMSA QP 605 - 815 Hornby Street, Vancouver, British Columbia Canada V6Z 2E6 Report Date: May 26, 2021 Effective Date: May 5, 2021 775-856-5700 210 S Rock Blvd Reno, NV 89502 www.respec.com MINE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES A Division of RESPEC CONTENTS 1.0 SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Location and Ownership ...................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Exploration and Mining History .......................................................................................... 2 1.3 Past Production ..................................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Geology and Mineralization ................................................................................................. 3 1.5 Drilling, Sampling, Sample Preparation, Analysis, and Security ........................................ 4 1.6 Data Verification and Quality Assurance-Quality Control .................................................. 5 1.7 Metallurgical Testing ........................................................................................................... 6 1.8 Mineral Resource Estimate .................................................................................................
  • South Coast Air Quality Management District

    South Coast Air Quality Management District

    SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Preliminary Draft Staff Report Proposed Amended Rule 1407 – Control of Emissions of Arsenic, Cadmium, and Nickel from Non-Chromium Metal Melting Operations June 2019 Deputy Executive Officer Planning, Rule Development and Area Sources Philip M. Fine, Ph.D. Assistant Deputy Executive Officer Planning, Rule Development and Area Sources Susan Nakamura Planning and Rules Manager Planning, Rule Development and Area Sources Michael Morris Author: Michael Morris – Planning and Rules Manager Contributors: John Anderson – Air Quality Analysis and Compliance Supervisor Jason Aspell – Enforcement Manager Yadira DeHaro-Hammock – Senior Air Quality Chemist Luke Eisenhardt – Air Quality Specialist Kennard Ellis – Air Quality Specialist (retired) Mike Garibay – Supervising Air Quality Engineer Marco Polo – Air Quality Engineer II Barbara Radlein – Program Supervisor Amanda Sanders – Supervising Air Quality Inspector Areio Soltani – Supervising Air Quality Inspector Paul Stroik – Air Quality Specialist Charles Tupac – Supervising Air Quality Engineer Uyen-Uyen Vo – Program Supervisor Bill Welch – Senior Air Quality Engineer Lisa Wong – Assistant Air Quality Specialist Reviewed by: Barbara Baird – Chief Deputy Counsel Stacey Pruitt – Senior Deputy District Counsel William Wong – Principal Deputy District Counsel SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT GOVERNING BOARD Chairman: DR. WILLIAM A. BURKE Speaker of the Assembly Appointee Vice Chairman: BEN BENOIT Council Member, Wildomar Cities of Riverside County MEMBERS: LISA BARTLETT Supervisor, Fifth District County of Orange JOE BUSCAINO Council Member, 15th District City of Los Angeles Representative MICHAEL A. CACCIOTTI Council Member, South Pasadena Cities of Los Angeles County/Eastern Region VANESSA DELGADO Senate Rules Committee Appointee JANICE HAHN Supervisor, Fourth District County of Los Angeles LARRY MCCALLON Mayor Pro Tem, Highland Cities of San Bernardino County JUDITH MITCHELL Mayor, Rolling Hills Estates Cities of Los Angeles County/Western Region V.