DOCSLIB.ORG

8Th July 2020 Item No. 1 Application No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
8Th July 2020 Item No. 1 Application No Cttee: 8th July Item No. 1 2020 Application no: 17/00818/OUT For Details and Plans Click Here Site Address Manydown Land Off Roman Road And Worting Road Worting Road Basingstoke Hampshire Proposal Residential development of approximately 3,200 homes (up to a maximum of 3,520 homes) within Class C2 and C3; local centres including non-residential development (Class A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, D1, D2, B1); development of two primary schools; land for one secondary school; open spaces including a Country Park with related ancillary facilities (Class A1, A3, D1, D2), Neighbourhood Parks, natural green spaces, allotments, outdoor sports facilities and associated amenities, play provision, informal open space and landscaping; indoor sports facilities (Class D2); primary means of vehicular access from the surrounding highway network; a central street (The Main Street) through the Site; associated secondary means of access, parking, footpaths, cycle links and related transport facilities; provision of 5 permanent gypsy and traveller pitches and infrastructure works to provide drainage, utilities and associated services. All matters are reserved except the primary means of vehicular access onto the A339, B3400 and Roman Road. Registered: 1 March 2017 Expiry Date: 31 July 2020 Type of Outline Planning Case Officer: Lucy Page Application: Application 01256 845515 Applicant: Basingstoke & Agent: Mr N McKenna Deane BC & Hampshire County Council Ward: Buckskin Ward Member(s): Cllr T Jones Kempshott Cllr S Grant Rooksdown Cllr T Capon Winklebury Cllr H Eachus Sherborne St. John Cllr Mrs Court Oakley and North Cllr S Frost Waltham Cllr D Taylor Cllr H Golding Cllr T Robinson Cllr R Cooper Cllr A Freeman Cllr S Bound Parish: WOOTTON ST OS Grid Reference: 460045 152758 LAWRENCE CP OAKLEY AND DEANE CP ROOKSDOWN CP Recommendation: The applicant be invited to enter into a legal agreement (in accordance with the Community Infrastructure Levy Regulations 2010 and Policies CN1, CN5, CN6, CN8, CN9, EM4 of the Basingstoke and Deane Local Plan 2011-2029) between the applicant and the Borough and County Councils to include securing: 40% affordable housing with a 70/30 tenure split Proportion of Self Build/Custom build units and Gypsy and Traveller plots On site Public Open Space Allotment provision Play/recreation facilities including sports pitches Indoor sports facility On-site community facilities Provision for a Community Development Worker Provision of one three form entry Primary School 2.8ha site with associated contributions Provision of two form entry Primary School 2.2ha site with associated contributions To reserve 12ha of serviced land for one 12FE Secondary School with contributions to a 5 FE Secondary School Nursery and pre-school provision Delivery of local centres On-site health provision Landscape Management Plan Provision of a Country Park Country Park Management Plan Off-site Ecological Mitigation (contribution and works) On-site and off-site Public Rights of Way Improvements Delivery of principal access points and the link road Contribution to off-site improvements to footways and cycleways and connectivity to the Town Centre Contribution to off-site highway improvements Delivery of specified off-site highways works Public Transport Contribution Travel Plan Financial contribution towards necessary Traffic Regulation Orders Employment Skills Plan Broadband Provision Financial contribution towards necessary Traffic Regulation Orders Should the requirements set out above not be satisfactorily secured, then the Planning and Development Manager be delegated to REFUSE permission for appropriate reasons. The Planning and Development Manager be delegated authority to make minor alterations to the requirements of the legal agreement listed above and/or conditions listed at the end of this report where the objectives of the committee are still achieved. On completion of the legal agreement(s) the Planning and Development Manager be delegated to grant planning permission subject to the following reasons and conditions at the end of the report. Reasons for Approval 1. The proposed development would deliver housing development in accordance with the Borough's Land Supply requirements. The proposal would therefore accord with the provisions of the National Planning Policy Framework (February 2019) in relation to housing supply, Policies SS1 and SS3.10 of the Basingstoke and Deane Local Plan 2011-2029 and the Manydown Development Brief SPD (2016). 2. It is considered that the quantum of development proposed by the outline planning application can be satisfactorily accommodated within the site. The proposed development will be consistent with the requirements of criteria (a) of Local Plan Policy SS3.10 for approximately 3,400 dwellings and for those other uses, such as social, community and green infrastructure, schools and other forms of accommodation, described by criteria (b), (c), (d), (e), (f) and other criteria in Policy SS3.10. The development is in accordance with the requirements of the Manydown Development Brief SPD and, in particular, the development as described in objectives (1) and (3) of the SPD for approximately 3,400 new homes and other social and community infrastructure. 3. Whilst introducing a significant amount of development onto the site, the proposal can be accommodated so not to result a significantly detrimental impact on the landscape character and scenic quality of the area. The development would provide an acceptable degree of mitigation whilst delivering housing development. The proposal therefore complies with the National Planning Policy Framework (February 2019) and Policies SS3.10, EM1 and EM10 of the Basingstoke and Deane Local Plan 2011-2029 and the Manydown Development Brief SPD. 4. The proposed development would provide safe access in accordance with highway requirements, and make suitable provision for future access requirements that may be required to serve future development and as such would accord with the National Planning Policy Framework (February 2019), Policies SS3.10, EM10 and CN9 of the Basingstoke and Deane Local Plan 2011-2029 and the Manydown Development Brief SPD. 5. With the use of appropriate conditions and planning obligations the proposal would conserve and provide a framework for the enhancement of the overall biodiversity value and nature conservation interests of the site providing a biodiversity net gain and as such the proposal would comply with the National Planning Policy Framework (2019), Policies SS3.10 and EM4 of the Basingstoke and Deane Local Plan 2011- 2029, the Manydown Development Brief SPD and the Landscape, Biodiversity and Trees SPD. 6. The development can be accommodated on the site so as not result in an adverse increase risk of flooding and as such the proposal would comply with National Planning Policy Framework (February 2019), Policies EM7 and SS3.10 of the Basingstoke and Deane Local Plan 2011-2029 and the Manydown Development Brief SPD. 7. Adequate drainage (foul and surface water) can be provided for the development and can be adequately controlled through other legislation, and through planning conditions, so as to ensure that there would be no risk to property or the environment. The proposal accords with the NPPF (February 2019), Policies SS3.10 and EM7 of the Basingstoke and Deane Local Plan 2011-2029 and the Manydown Development Brief SPD. 8. The proposed housing development is development that without mitigation could result in pollution and is also sensitive to pollution including air pollution, noise and vibration. Development can be accommodated on the site which would result in no significantly detrimental impact to existing and future residents beyond that which may be reasonably expected, as a result of existing, historic, or nearby land uses and activity; and as such the proposal accords with the NPPF (February 2019), Policy EM12 of the Basingstoke and Deane Local Plan 2011 – 2029 and the Manydown Development Brief SPD. 9. The proposed development would provide policy compliant affordable housing to meet an identified need. As such the proposal would comply with the National Planning Policy Framework (2019), Policy CN1 of the Basingstoke and Deane Local Plan 2011- 2029, the Manydown Development Brief SPD and the Housing SPD. 10. Through the provision of a Section 106 Legal Agreement, the development would provide adequate infrastructure to mitigate the impact of the development. The development would therefore comply with the National Planning Policy Framework (2019); the Community Infrastructure Levy Regulations 2010; and Policies CN1, CN6, CN7, CN8, and CN9 of the Basingstoke and Deane Local Plan 2011-2029. 11. Through the provision of a Section 106 Legal Agreement the development would provide an appropriate mix of housing including self-build/custom build and Gypsy and Traveller provision and as such the proposal would comply with the National Planning Policy Framework (2019), Policy CN3 of the Basingstoke and Deane Local Plan 2011- 2029 and the Manydown Development Brief SPD. 12. The proposed development would result in less than substantial harm to the setting of the Worting Conservation Area, neighbouring Listed Buildings and Scheduled Monuments but is acceptable when considered against the public benefits of the development including the significant contribution to the council’s housing land supply requirements. As such the development complies with paragraph 196 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2019), Policy
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Hampshire Definitive Statement of Public Rights Of
    Information on Rights of Way in Hampshire including extracts from “The Hampshire Definitive Statement of Public Rights of Way” Prepared by the County Council under section 33(1) of the National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949 and section 57(3) of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 The relevant date of this document is 15th December 2007 Published 1st January 2008 Notes: 1. Save as otherwise provided, the prefix SU applies to all grid references 2. The majority of the statements set out in column 5 were prepared between 1950 and 1964 and have not been revised save as provided by column 6 3. Paths numbered with the prefix ‘5’ were added to the definitive map after 1st January 1964 4. Paths numbered with the prefix ‘7’ were originally in an adjoining parish but have been affected by a diversion or parish boundary change since 1st January 1964 5. Paths numbered with the prefix ‘9’ were in an adjoining county on 1st January 1964 6. Columns 3 and 4 do not form part of the Definitive Statement and are included for information only Parish and Path No. Status Start Point End point Descriptions, Conditions and Limitations (Grid ref and (Grid ref and description) description) Oakley 1 Bridleway 5513 5278 5623 5157 From Road U.8, White Lane, to Road C.89, west of Summer Down Farm White Lane Ivy Down Lane From U.8 through gap, southeastwards along headland of arable field, and along earth path through tree belt, then along headland of arable field, and along grass track, through gap, along headland of arable field and through gap on to Road C.89 west of Summer Down Farm.
    [Show full text]
  • Registered Treatment Premises(PDF)
    Name Address Treatment Mick and Bobs 8 Winton Square Basingstoke Hampshire RG21 8EW Tattoo Poison Ink Unit 49 Basepoint Enterprise Centre Stroudley Road Basingstoke RG24 8UP Tattoo Area 51 12 Church Street Basingstoke Hampshire RG21 7QH Tattoo/Piercing Inkinit Tattoos 135 Worting Road Basingstoke Hampshire RG22 6NL Tattoo/Piercing Underworld Tattoos 24 Wateridge Road Basingstoke Hampshire RG21 5RA Tattoo Inki Fingers Feathers House Feathers Yard Basingstoke RG21 7AS Tattoo/Piercing Poison Ink Piercing Unit 1a Basepoint Enterprise Centre Stroudley Road Basingstoke RG24 8UP Piercing Eloquin 23c Goat Lane Basingstoke Hampshire RG21 7PZ Piercing/Electrolysis/skin colouring Wax Works 31 Church Street Basingstoke Hampshire RG21 7QQ Electrolysis/Ear piercing Julie Crue Hair Salon 1 Clapham House Festival Place Basingstoke RG21 7AR Electrolysis/Ear piercing Beechdown Centre Beechdown Park Winchester RoadBasingstoke RG22 4ES Electrolysis Natural Beauty Unit 20 Viables Craft Centre Harrow Way Basingstoke RG22 4BJ Electrolysis/Ear piercing Barcelo Country Hotel Scures Hill Nately Scures Nr Hook RG27 9JS Electrolysis Apollo Hotel Aldermaston Roundabout Basingstoke Hampshire RG24 9NU Electrolysis Rejuvenate 1a George Street Kingsclere Hampshire RG21 7RN Electrolysis/Ear piercing The Grange Kings Road Silchester Reading RG7 2NP Electrolysis English Rose Worting House Worting Road Basingstoke RG23 8PX Electrolysis Essentia Beauty 4 Woodville Rise Chineham Basingstoke RG24 8GR Electrolysis Evolve BCOT South Site Worting Road Basingstoke RG21 8TN Electrolysis/Ear
    [Show full text]
  • The Villager
    The Villager December/January 2018 Sherbornes and Pamber 1 04412_Villager_July2012:19191_Villager_Oct07 2/7/12 17:08 Page 40 2 Communications to the Editor: the Villager CONTACTS Editor: Julie Crawley Happy Christmas and peaceful New Year 01256 851003 to all our Villager readers [email protected] • The next issue of the Villager will be in February 2018. If you have any photos, pieces that you think will be of interest to Villager readers please do send them to Advertisements: me before the 12th January. The email address is: [email protected] Emma Foreman • If you know of anyone who would like to receive a monthly copy of the Villager 01256 889215/07747 015494 magazine via email – free of charge – please ask them to get in touch with me at [email protected] [email protected]. • We are still looking for some more people to distribute the Villager – particularly Distribution: down part of Vyne Road in Sherborne St John from January/February 2018 George Rust onwards – could that be you? Please contact either myself or George Rust. 01256 850413 [email protected] Loddon Valley Lions Father Christmas Float Tuesday 12th December 5.45pm Queens College Arms, Future Events: Monk Sherborne, Pamber End, College Arms Lindsay Berry Wednesday 13th December 5.45pm Swan Pub, 01256 850495 Sherborne St John, West End [email protected] Pamber Correspondent: Update on the Vyne Roof Ann Ellis My thanks to Chris Pound for his photos below. [email protected] I am told that the scaffolding should be coming down at the end of January/ February so if you are interested in seeing the work being done - get up there soon! The rooftop walkway is included in the admission price (NT members are free) and is accessible between 11am and 3pm.
    [Show full text]
  • The Iron Age and the Romano-British Enclosures at Lamb's Field, Worting
    Proc. Hampshire Field Club Archaeol. Soc. 70, 2015, 41–62 (Hampshire Studies 2015) THE IRON AGE AND ROMANO-BRITISH ENCLOSURES AT LAMB’S FIELD, WORTING: EXCAVATIONS BY THE BASINGSTOKE ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL SOCIETY, 1992–2008 By BRIONY A LALOR ABSTRACT (Fig. 2). They were extensively investigated by excavating sixteen trenches. Through analysis The excavations at Lamb’s Field, Worting, Basing- of the individual assemblages, with specific stoke, provided evidence for a small Late Iron Age to focus on the pottery, a chronology for each of Early Romano-British complex of ditches and a rec- the ditch features has been established. tangular enclosure that flourished between 100 BC and AD 100. The enclosure post-dated two curvilin- The Site in context ear ditches and had been modified over time. With no clear evidence of occupational structures within The site located at NGR SU 601523 lies at a the enclosure, the features are thought to be associ- height of 120m above Ordnance Datum north- ated with animal husbandry, with the curvilinear west of the centre of Basingstoke, situated on features representing an earlier boundary to an area an area of undulating downland (Fig. 1). The of occupation to the south. geology is Upper Chalk with localised areas of clay-with-flints covered by a plough soil of greyish-brown silty clay. A band of Reading INTRODUCTION Beds comprising clays, silt and fine grained sand overlies the Chalk 4.5km to the north-east. With the permission of Dr Richenda Power, Further north the Reading Beds are overlain a series of eleven excavations took place in by London Clay (British Regional Geology Lamb’s Field, Church Lane, Worting between 1982).
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet One: Shaping a Place, Creating a Community Highways and Access
    July 2018 Fact sheet one: shaping a place, creating a community highways and access What was said during the initial planning consultation? As part of the initial consultation on the outline planning application, Hampshire County Council, as the body responsible for highways, raised concerns about the safety and capacity of the proposed new access junctions and asked for more information about walking, cycling and public transport. More generally there was concern about the traffic impact of the development on existing roads and neighbourhoods. How have we responded? Our team of engineers has updated the designs for the main junctions to address safety and capacity concerns, in consultation with the county council. We have also supplied the requested information on walking, cycling and public transport. Detailed information can be found in the updated Transport Assessment. The capacity of the junctions takes account of all forecast traffic to and from Manydown, other development sites in the adopted Local Plan and likely general traffic growth in the borough to 2031. Changes to the northern junction A339 Rooksdown The access from the A339 (Newbury Road) Indicative location of Avenue will change from one large roundabout connection between to two medium-sized roundabouts, both Roman Road and main with traffic lights. street This is designed to improve capacity to cope with rush hour traffic and encourage through traffic to use the A339 rather than cut through Rooksdown. It also allows for 2 the creation of a neighbourhood park as a 1 gateway to the site. The existing pedestrian bridge would be replaced in broadly the same Wellington location.
    [Show full text]
  • The Old Rectory WORTING • BASINGSTOKE • HAMPSHIRE the Old Rectory WORTING • BASINGSTOKE • HAMPSHIRE
    the old rectory WORTING • BASINGSTOKE • HAMPSHIRE the old rectory WORTING • BASINGSTOKE • HAMPSHIRE A glorious former rectory Basingstoke 3 miles • Newbury 15 miles • Winchester 18 miles London 45 miles • London Waterloo via Basingstoke Station from 45 minutes (All distances and times are approximate) Reception hall • Drawing room • Dining room • Study • Kitchen Family room/breakfast room • Utility room • Boot room • Conservatory Cloakroom • Cellar Master bedroom with dressing room and shower room 6/7 further bedrooms • Children’s den/bedroom 5 • 2 further bathrooms Indoor swimming pool with Jacuzzi and shower room • Pool plant room Garaging with storeroom/workshop above Delightful mature gardens and grounds In all about 0.56 hectares (1.39 acres) These particulars are intended only as a guide and must not be relied upon as statements of fact. Your attention is drawn to the Important Notice on the last page of the text. The Old Rectory The Grade II listed old rectory is believed to date from the 18/19th Ornate cornicing and dados are to be found throughout, as well as shutters centuries. It has an interesting history believed to have been visited by Jane in the main reception rooms and master bedroom. The Tuscan pillared Austen. The house was occupied at the time by the Rev Blackstone and his entrance opens into the reception hall/sitting room where there is an open wife and they are known to have visited Jane and her family many times at fire. The attractive and spacious drawing room is also approached from the their home in nearby Steventon. reception hall. Electric wrought iron gates lead to a carriage sweep at the front.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Health and Public Services
    PUBLIC HEALTH AND PUBLIC SERVICES The Middle Ages and Early Modern Period In medieval and early modern Basingstoke, as elsewhere, the role of local government was extremely limited. The governing courts carried out a variety of roles, mainly concerned with regulating anti-social activities. Many were concerned with the smooth running of commerce, on which the everyday life of a town depended, dealing with small-scale debts, regulating the times and context of sales, the alehouse drinking hours, or dealing with violence.1 There were times when the court intervened in the condition of the roads, but not to take up general maintenance. Periodically, someone was presented for blocking the road with timber, refuse or even with a dead horse, or for having an adjacent ditch that was blocked and overflowing. Occasionally the state of a road meant that the whole tithing was ordered to repair it as with the road from Coppid bridge to the market in 1550.2 The steep slope up Church Street to the market place frequently became muddy during wet spells. When a causeway was built (probably for pedestrians), it was financed by a wealthy merchant, Sir James Deane, rather than the burgesses.3 Various people were given responsibility for the maintenance of the two bridges over the Loddon. Occasionally the tithing, the bailiffs, or an individual was required to repair one of the bridges as in 1560 and 1561.4 The river was both a natural source of water and used for drainage and refuse disposal. This led to regulations limiting the time in which dyers and leather workers could dump their effluent, restricting its use to the evening or the night time.5 In 1547, it resulted in the demand for the vicar to remove his latrine, which he built over the stream, ‘which is a great nuisance to all those who washed there’.6 Again this involved regulation rather than investment.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic History Trade and Industry 1850 to 2013
    ECONOMIC HISTORY TRADE AND INDUSTRY 1850 TO 2013 Before the 1850s the goods that Basingstoke manufactured were mainly sold locally. It was only after the arrival of the railway in 1839, followed in 1856 by the establishment of the North Hants Iron Works and the arrival of Thomas Burberry, that Basingstoke began exporting goods in any quantity across the United Kingdom and, later, overseas.1 In 1686 Basingstoke had been the fifth most populous town in Hampshire. Although it lost its major industry, cloth production, by 1700 it remained an important town. It retained its roles as a major market for the countryside and small towns of the area around, and as a stopping off point on one of the major routes to London. The villages could sell their produce here and purchase goods in return, whether imported products or those produced in the workshops of the town. This marketing role for its agricultural hinterland helped encourage the large-scale investment required in the creation of a canal to London, opened in 1794. Coal and timber could be imported and malt and other agricultural produce could be sent to London. However, the investment turned out to be a poor one as the returns of the canal were falling significantly before the coming of the railways. The construction of the railways and the town’s emergence between 1840 and 1854 as the junction for three routes transformed Basingstoke’s economy. While the railways devastated the road carrying and innkeeping trades, they also offered considerable advantages for the 1 Many Hampshire volunteers contributed to this project led by Bob Clarke.
    [Show full text]
  • Land at Manydown, Basingstoke
    Land at Manydown, shaping a place, creating a community Basingstoke MSD3R: Landscape Strategy Revision July 2018 Note: This document is a revision and supersedes the version submitted March 2017. shaping a place, creating a community MSD3R: Landscape Strategy Q addition of an area of ‘Strategic Multi-Functional Green Space: Green corridors Summary of changes to application material and Buffers’ south of A339 where the potential location of allotments is Since the original submission in March 2017, there have been a number of changes identified; to the planning application in response to comments from Statutory Consultees, Q addition of ‘Strategic Multi-Functional Green Space: Green Corridors and members of the public and the Local Planning Authority. In summary, these changes Buffers’ to the south of the B3400 and ‘Strategic Multi-Functional Green are as follows: Space: Biodiversity and Landscape Features’ to the north of the B3400; Q confirmation that the Proposed Development will be for approximately 3,200 Q extension of the 25 metre noise and vibration buffer adjacent to the railway on homes (up to a maximum of 3,520 homes). Within the ES submitted as part of the Open Space and Landscape Parameter Plan so that this extends to the full the planning application in February 2017, assessments had adopted up to 3,520 developable frontage with the railway; residential dwellings as a sensitivity test; Q the key on the Open Space and Landscape Parameter Plan has been updated Q changes have been made to the building heights for each of the areas on the to note that the areas of ‘Strategic Multi-Functional Green Space: Visual Building Heights and Density Parameter Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Parish and Settlement Groupsm
    Q1. Which village, town or part of a town do you consider as your "local area"? East of Basingstoke (generic) Where more than one of the following is mentioned: Old Basing Bramley Chineham Lychpit Mapledurwell Nately Scures Newnham Sherfield on loddon Bramley Chineham Sherfield park Taylor’s farm Lychpit Newnham Old Basing Sherfield on loddon Eastern parishes Mapledurwell Nately Scures Scures hill Up Nately Basingstoke town Basingstoke North East Marnel park Norden Oakridge Popley South View Basingstoke North West Rooksdown Winklebury Basingstoke Central Berg estate Brookvale Cranbourne Down Grange Eastrop Fairfields Kings Furlong Riverdene South Ham Basingstoke West Buckskin Clarke estate Kempshott Manydown Pack Lane Roman road Worting Basingstoke South Black Dam Brighton Hill Viables Basingstoke South West Beggarwood Hatch Warren Oakley and Deane Oakley Harrow Way Deane Newfound Burghclere Highclere Kingsclere Woolton Hill Northern western parishes Ashford Hill and Headley Ashmansworth Ball Hill Bishops Green Burghclere East Woodhay Ecchinswell Headley Hannington Penwood North eastern parishes (exc Bramley/Sherfield on Loddon) Hartley Wespall Stratfield Saye Stratfield Turgis Ellisfield South east parishes (excl. Ellisfield) Axford, Nutley, Preston Candover Bradley Cliddesden Dummer Fairleigh wallop Herriard Nutley Preston Candover Tunworth Upton Grey Weston Patrick Tadley Northern parishes (exc Tadley) Baughurst Silchester Charter Alley Little London Newtown Pamber End Pamber Green Pamber Heath Ramsdell Wolverton common North of Basingstoke Sherborne St John Monk Sherborne Wootton St Lawrence Overton Southern parishes North Waltham Steventon Whitchurch South West parishes Hurstborne Priors Laverstoke St Mary Bourne Stoke Other Other Basingstoke & Deane Andover Burghfield Hook Eversley Fleet Micheldever Newbury Odiham Winchester .
    [Show full text]
  • [HANTS.] 6 L POST OFFICE •
    • , , ,; [HANTS.] 6 l POST OFFICE • - , , , • • • ~ACTING COUNTY.~ MAGISTRATES, }'OR THE • ---------------------. I• ' I' • , LORD LIEUTENANT AND CUSTOS ROTULORUM. • ., TIlE MOST HON. THE MARQUIS OF WINCHESTER., AMPORT sr. MARY'S, ANDOVER. • I HIGH SHERIFF. " ." , WILLIAM HOWLEY KINGSMILL, ESQ., SYDMONTON COURT, NEWBURY. " " • • • . Those marked thus t usually act as Chairmen of Petty Sessions. Those marked thus. are Deputy Lieutenants ofthe County• , 1 _ •• .. \ • " . ( . DIVISION~ Deane W. H. Fairyfleld; Fareham . , 'ALTON , • ., t Deverell J oho, esq. Purbrook park, Cosham tBurningnam Henry, esq. F1'oyle house, Alton ,. Field Capt. Edward, R.N. The Grove, Gosport tilt Knif.rht Edward, esq. Chawton house, Alton ) Hodgkinson Capt. Thomas, R.N. Elms Leig'h, Havant Knight Montagu G. esq. Chawton bouse' Le Blanc Colonel Francis, Blackbrook house, Fareham ~cott George A1'thur J e1'voise, esq. Rother6eld park, Alton I,ong George, esq. Grove lod~e. Southsea ' Stephens Capt. Frederick, Bentworth lodge Maine Rev. J. T. Dover court, Southsea .' tWickham William, esq. Wyck house, Binsted, Alton Mansel Colonel Robert, Anglesey, Gosport' t Wood :robn Gatho1'ne, esq. Thedden grange, Alton' '-, ..Maxse Capt. }<'. A. R.N. 67 Cromwell road, South Ken- Clerk to the Magistmt'es, Wm. Trimminl-!:,High st.Alton sington, London u" ,',. ,,' Petty Se.ysions are lleld at the Town hall, Alton, every Munday I,.ieut.-CoI. Robert Miller alternate tuesday.· . .,' O'Callaghan Vice-Admiral George WiIliam Douglas, C.15. ANnOVER DIVISION. Deer Leap, Rowlands castle, Havant Portsmouth The Right Hon. the Earl of, Hurstborne parl{, Purvis Capt. Richard.Fisher, R.N. Bury hall, Gosport Whitchurch -.. Sartoris Ellward, Warsash huuse, 'l'itchfield - • Best Rev. Thomas, Red Rice house, Andover Smith Spencer, esq.
    [Show full text]
  • Worting Conservation Area Appraisal
    Conservation Area Appraisal Conservation Area Appraisal Worting …making a differenceWorting Conservation Area Appraisal Introduction Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council designated the Worting Conservation Area in 1982 in recognition of the special architectural and historic interest of the hamlet. Having designated the Conservation Area, the Local Authority has a statutory duty to ensure that those elements that form its particular character or appearance should be preserved or enhanced, especially when considering planning applications. It is therefore necessary to define and analyse those qualities or elements St Thomas of Canterbury Church that contribute to, or detract from, the special interest of the area and to assess how they combine to justify its designation as a Conservation Area. Such factors can include: • its historic development; • the contribution of individual or groups of buildings to the streetscene and the spaces that surround them; and • the relationship between the built environment and the landscape. They can also include the less tangible senses and experiences such as Former Worting Farm noises and smells, which can play a key part in forming the distinctive character of an area. The Appraisal takes the form of written text and an Appraisal plan. In both respects, every effort has been made to include or analyse those elements that are key to the special character of the area. Where buildings, structures or features have not been specifically highlighted, this does not mean that they are of no visual or historic value to the Conservation Area. The document is intended to be an overall framework and guide within which decisions can be made on a site-specific basis.
    [Show full text]